CONSULTATION PAPER 08/5: SPONSOR REGIME A TARGETED REVIEW
|
|
- Kristin Mills
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 10 September 2008 Our ref: ICAEW Rep 94/08 Helen Butterworth Markets Division Financial Services Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS By and Dear Ms Butterworth CONSULTATION PAPER 08/5: SPONSOR REGIME A TARGETED REVIEW CONSULTATION PAPER 08/12: QUARTERLY CONSULTATION (NO.17) The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales is pleased to respond to your request for comments on Consultation Paper 08/5: Sponsor regime a targeted review and in Chapter 12 of Consultation Paper 08/12: Quarterly Consultation (No.17). Please contact me should you wish to discuss any of the points raised in the attached response. Yours sincerely Katerina Joannou Manager, Capital Markets Policy Corporate Finance Faculty T +44 (0) F +44 (0) E katerina.joannou@icaew.com Chartered Accountants Hall PO Box 433 Moorgate Place London EC2P 2BJ T +44 (0) F +44 (0) DX DX 877 London/City
2 ICAEW Representation ICAEW REP 94/08 CP 08/5 SPONSOR REGIME A TARGETED REVIEW CP 08/12 QUARTERLY CONSULTATION (NO. 17) Memorandum of comment submitted in September 2008 by The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, in response to the Financial Services Authority s consultation papers CP 08/5 Sponsor regime a targeted review, published in March 2008; and CP 08/12 Quarterly Consultation (No.17), published in July 2008 Contents Paragraph Introduction 1 Who we are 2-4 Major points 5-7 Responses to specific questions in CP 08/ Other points on CP 08/ Responses to specific questions in CP 08/12 (Chapter 12) Chartered Accountants Hall PO Box 433 Moorgate Place London EC2P 2BJ T +44 (0) F +44 (0) DX DX 877 London/City
3 INTRODUCTION 1. The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (the ICAEW) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the consultation paper Sponsor regime a targeted review and on Chapter 12 of the consultation paper Quarterly Consultation (No.17) published by Financial Services Authority. WHO WE ARE 2. The ICAEW operates under a Royal Charter, working in the public interest. Its regulation of its members, in particular its responsibilities in respect of auditors, is overseen by the Financial Reporting Council. As a world leading professional accountancy body, the ICAEW provides leadership and practical support to over 130,000 members in more than 140 countries, working with governments, regulators and industry in order to ensure the highest standards are maintained. The ICAEW is a founding member of the Global Accounting Alliance with over 700,000 members worldwide. 3. Our members provide financial knowledge and guidance based on the highest technical and ethical standards. They are trained to challenge people and organisations to think and act differently, to provide clarity and rigour, and so help create and sustain prosperity. The ICAEW ensures these skills are constantly developed, recognised and valued. 4. The ICAEW s Corporate Finance Faculty is a network of over 6,000 corporate finance professionals. This response draws on the expertise of Faculty members, including sponsors and reporting accountants. MAJOR POINTS Support for the initiatives 5. We support the FSA s objective to move to a more principles-based sponsor regime and its proposals to clarify the application of the Principles for sponsors set out in LR We agree with the FSA s proposal to supplement the principles with guidance to ensure firms approach the regime properly and responsibly. Guidance will help ensure consistent market practice, reduce the scope for misinterpretation and prevent competitive pressures among sponsor houses. 7. We support the proposal to delete the SEE provisions and replace them with alternative guidance on the basis that it is more consistent with a principles-based approach and not that it is an indication that suitably experienced employees are not required by a sponsor. We believe that sponsor firms, when assessing their collective experience and competence, will continue to drill down to the individual employee level and we assume that the FSA will also continue to need to have reference to employees skills and expertise. We believe that more detailed guidance is needed as to how the expertise of individuals within a sponsor firm is intended to be assessed. 4
4 RESPONSES TO SPECIFIC QUESTIONS IN CP 08/5 Q1: Subject to the exceptions set out above, do you agree that the Principles for sponsors should only apply when a sponsor is required by LR8.2? 8. We agree that clarity is needed on when the sponsor regime applies given the FSA s experience that the application of the Principles for sponsors in LR8.3 has been the subject of differing interpretation. We agree with the proposal that the Principles for sponsors should only apply when a sponsor is required to be appointed or to provide guidance to a listed company. 9. We support the FSA s proposed plan to take into account the quality of other advice given by sponsors, where such advice is relevant to a sponsor s competence. However a sponsor firm s practice is not determined purely by specific points of transaction but about how the firm acts on an ongoing basis and we are concerned that the emphasis appears to be on using poor or inappropriate advice as evidence of lack of competence, rather than providing an opportunity for sponsors to demonstrate competence. By its nature, poor advice is much more likely to leave evidence behind than cases where timely and apposite advice to a company averted a compliance disaster. Accordingly, we would only wish to see other advice taken into account if it were taken in context and if examples of good advice are taken into account to support an argument for a sponsor s competence. Sponsor competence Q2: Do you agree that the demonstration of a firm s competence is key to retaining the integrity of the sponsor regime? If not, how do you believe the integrity of the regime should be maintained? 10. We agree. Q3: Do you agree that LR8.6.7 should be retained in substance? If not what amendments do you think are required and why? 11. We agree. Q4: Do you agree that the matters set out in LR8.6.8 (as revised) can be used by firms to demonstrate their competence? If not, what other factors do you think are relevant? 12. We agree that the two specific factors referred to in LR8.6.8 (as revised) are relevant for the FSA in assessing competence. We note that the rule implies the FSA may have regard for other things as well in assessing competence. It would be helpful for guidance to be given as to other such factors. We consider that these could include: a. General experience of corporate finance transactions b. Knowledge of other UK regulations eg the Takeover Code and the AIM Rules c. The professionalism of the organisation the FSA has to be able to rely on high standards of work and the integrity of individuals within the organisation 5
5 d. The depth of resource in practice advising a client as sponsor involves a team rather than an individual and therefore the capabilities of the team responsible for sponsor services are important In our view these factors are important to enable a person to provide complete advice to a listed company. Q5: Do you agree that the experience of firms in advising Listed companies or new applicants on the LRs and DTRs, in circumstances other than in providing sponsor services, should, where relevant, be taken into account when assessing sponsor competence? If so do you agree that we should, where relevant also take into account the quality of the advice if it is detrimental to sponsors or sponsor applicants? 13. We agree that assessing competence may take into account experience of advising listed companies or new applicants on the LRs and the DTRs even where such work does not fall into the sponsor role. In addition we agree the FSA should take into account the quality of the work performed by the adviser, to the extent it falls within the remit of the FSA (ie for sponsor work and for non-sponsor work that relates to the LRs and the DTRs). 14. Furthermore we believe that other corporate finance experience is also relevant in demonstrating appropriate competence. In this respect we consider that the illustrations provided in the amended sponsor application form could result in narrowing the type of work that is perceived to be relevant to competence. 15. In addition to the illustrations provided we consider that experience of lead advisory roles on other complex transactions, such as AIM admission documents and reverse takeovers and public takeovers, and on-going advisory work such as acting as nomad should contribute to demonstrating competence for acting as sponsor. In acting as nomad, responsibility for regulatory guidance generally rests with the nomad rather than the regulator and therefore in this respect the nomad role can be considered more onerous than the sponsor role. In gaining experience of such complex transactions and in providing day-to-day advice to companies as nomad, advisers will be required to be adept at advising companies on detailed regulations, to be familiar with the burden of preparing documents to the highest standards and to be capable of dealing with regulators in a reliable manner. Q6: Do you agree that expertise in advising companies on the matters set out in LR8.2 is critical to demonstrating sponsor competence? If not, how would you demonstrate a firm s ability to provide robust sponsor declarations and provide expert advice to issuers? 16. We agree. However consistent with our response to Question 5 above we believe that other corporate finance expertise is also relevant. Q7: Do you agree that the SEE provisions should be deleted and that the responsibility for appropriate staffing and supervision of sponsor activity should be placed on a sponsor firm s management? 17. We agree that a sponsor firm s management should be responsible for appropriate staffing and supervision of sponsor activity. 6
6 18. We agree that there are certain shortcomings with the SEE regime. The two main issues we perceive with this are: a. The SEE requirements are set very prescriptively with specific transaction requirements during a three year period. There is little flexibility to reflect the fact an individual s professional or personal circumstances may make it difficult to fit these precise requirements from one year to the next. However, an individual having gained the competence to act as sponsor should not automatically lose that due to a temporary break in the provision of sponsor services. b. The SEE regime seeks to allocate relevant transactions to one person in a sponsor firm whereas the work will typically have been conducted by a team of people and more than one senior person in that team may gain relevant experience from that transaction. 19. There needs to be a modification to the SEE regime to allow more flexibility in assessing sponsor competence as raised above. This could be achieved by modifying the SEE rules to permit some relaxation or, as proposed, by deletion of the SEE regime altogether and replacement of it with alternative guidance. We consider the latter is more consistent with the FSA s intention of moving towards a more principles-based approach and assume that the proposal does not indicate that suitably experienced employees are not required by a sponsor. 20. In our view a firm-wide approach to sponsor competence cannot be meaningfully applied without reference at some point, both by the sponsor and by the FSA, to employees skills and expertise. We assume that sponsor firms, when assessing their collective experience and competence, will continue to drill down to the individual employee level and that the FSA will also continue to need to have reference to employees skills and expertise. We believe that more detailed guidance is needed as to how the expertise of individuals within a sponsor firm is intended to be assessed. For example is it the FSA s view that if all or too many of those employees leave the firm, the firm would no longer be compliant with the competence requirements? We would be interested to know whether the FSA plans to consult further on how it proposes to assess individual expertise. Q8: Do you agree that we should retain the annual requirement for a sponsor to confirm that it continues to meet the approval criteria? If not, what sort of comfort do you believe should be sufficient to retain sponsor approval? 21. We agree that the annual requirement for confirming that appropriate systems and controls are in place should be retained. Sponsor systems and controls Q9: Do you agree with the proposal to move from adequate to appropriate systems and controls as a requirement for sponsor approval? 22. We agree. 7
7 Q10: Do you agree that appropriate controls to ensure employees receive proper guidance and training in carrying out sponsor services will help sponsors comply with LR8.6.5(3)? 23. We agree and we are interested in what the FSA regards as proper training. In addition to formal training relating to the LRs and the DTRs, we consider that highly relevant training for the provision of sponsor services will be gained from working in a junior position on a transaction which requires a sponsor or nonsponsor role involving the LRs or the DTR or another complex transaction as described in our response to Q5. In addition other corporate finance training is important eg AML training. Q11: Do you agree that appropriate staffing to ensure proper performance of sponsor services will assist sponsors in complying with LR8.6.5(3)? 24. We agree. Q12: Do you agree that we should retain the other factors in LR and LR with the suggested amendments? 25. We agree. Q13: Do you agree that we should give more specific guidance on identifying and managing conflicts given the proposals for the introduction of a new LR8.3.6ff? If so, do you agree that the proposals set out in LR8.6.12A provide useful guidance to sponsor firms? 26. We agree. In the absence of specific guidance there may be a trend towards sponsor firms concluding that all conflicts can be managed. Q14: In order to perform sponsor services in a competent manner are there any other systems and controls which you believe are important? 27. We consider that all operational aspects of running a sponsor/corporate finance business (eg as would be described in the firm s SYSC manual) could have a material relevance to the competence of the firm. There is a range of factors which could be important, such as: a. Senior management b. Strategy c. How the firm recruits, retains, trains and rewards staff d. How client relationships are managed e. How conflicts are handled, transaction risks managed and the compliance environment Sponsor independence and conflicts management Q15: Do you agree that the proposed requirements for sponsors to identify and manage conflicts are an appropriate method of ensuring that sponsors perform their role in a proper manner? 28. We believe that the new rules ( ) on their own will not ensure that all conflicts are handled in the correct manner. Guidance will be needed on how the FSA will assess the conflicts management arrangements or what it will take into account (as suggested in Q13). 8
8 Q16: Do you agree that appropriate conflict management arrangements should be sufficient in most cases to enable a sponsor to act where its group has more than one interest in a transaction? 29. We agree that appropriate conflict management arrangements will be sufficient in many cases to enable a sponsor to act where its group has more that one interest in a transaction. Uniformity of approach among sponsor firms is desirable and it would be helpful if the FSA identified the conflicts that it considers are not capable of being managed. Q17: Do you agree that the detailed thresholds contained in LR8.3.6 should be removed and replaced with a high level principle and guidance? 30. We agree but we consider that uniformity of approach among sponsor firms is desirable. This could be achieved by having adequate guidance and illustrations of how the high level principle can be applied (and assessed). There is a risk that, without a way of benchmarking a sponsor s approach, consistency in the market will be lost. Q18: Do you agree that not all conflicts can be managed and that providing sponsor services in those cases could have an adverse impact on market confidence in the sponsor regime? 31. We agree and refer to our answer to Q16. Q19: Do you agree that when identifying conflicts of interest a sponsor should consider those conflicts that could create a perception in the market that it may not be able to perform its functions properly? 32. We agree. Market reputation is of utmost importance to a sponsor and identifying circumstances that could influence market perception is an effective safeguard of reputation. Moreover the market is likely to continue to look to the FSA to determine whether a sponsor is suitably independent in discharging its responsibilities and guidance from the FSA, as mentioned in our response to Q17, would be helpful. Q20: Do you agree that disclosure in general is not an appropriate method of conflicts management for sponsors given a sponsor s regulatory obligations set out in LR8.3.1(1) and (2)? If you consider that disclosure may be an appropriate method of conflicts management, given the different objectives of the sponsor conflict provisions, please provide details of how disclosure would be used in this way? 33. We agree that, while it may be a helpful incentive to consider potential conflicts, disclosure of the existence of a conflict does not per se constitute management of the conflict. Marketing of new applicants Q21: Should LR be deleted in their entirety? 34. It is not clear from the analysis whether the change in market practice means that the need to protect investors no longer arises. We agree with the proposal on the assumption that investor protection is not at risk. Otherwise the risk of conflict 9
9 through placing shares with connected clients of the sponsor could usefully be one of the risks that the FSA considers including in the guidance proposed in Q13. Q22: Alternatively, do you believe that the disclosure requirements in LR8.4.5(2) and (3) provide useful investor protection? 35. No as per our response to Q21. Record keeping Q23: Do you agree that sponsor firms should retain records in relation to their compliance with LR ? Should this be subject to any time limit? 36. We recognise that some firms may not currently retain records, and for those firms the proposal may be more onerous than for others. We do, however, agree with the proposed requirement. We also consider that it is reasonable to apply a time limit to such record retention and for consistency with other record retention the FSA could consider a time limit of 6 years. We believe that any time limit should be no longer than that which the FSA considers necessary for its sponsor monitoring purposes. Q24: Do you agree that an annual confirmation should be retained? If so, do you agree that those confirmations should include details of the considerations the sponsor undertakes to reach its conclusions? 37. We agree that the requirement for an annual confirmation should be retained and that a record of it should be kept for a specific period (see response to Q23). We also agree that the annual confirmation should include details of the considerations undertaken by the sponsor prior to reaching a conclusion that appropriate systems and controls are in place but it would be helpful if the FSA provided guidance on the level of detail it considers reasonable. OTHER POINTS ON CP 08/5 Sponsor s Declaration on an Application for Listing (Appendix 2) 38. Page 1, item 3, the reference should be to LR not LR Page 2, second paragraph. The word reasonable should be inserted between in our and opinion reflecting the wording of eg LR8.4.3(3). 40. Page 2. In our view there should be reference to equivalent document as well as to prospectus or listing particulars. 10
10 RESPONSES TO SPECIFIC QUESTIONS IN CP 08/12 (Chapter 12) Sponsor independence Q17: Do you agree that in circumstances where a sponsor is not independent, the UKLA should be able to deny approval of a circular or the admission of securities to the Official List? 41. We agree but, consistent with our response above to Q17 of CP 08/5, we believe that the FSA should provide guidance on how it will assess the proposed high level principle on independence. It would be helpful for the FSA to indicate what would happen if a sponsor s independence were found to be lacking postadmission. Q18: If not, how do you consider that the UKLA will be able to provide an appropriate level of investor protection on transactions that require the appointment of a sponsor? 42. See our response to Q17. Q19: Do you agree that the UKLA should be able to require a sponsor to disclose information to it enable the UKLA to monitor sponsor firms? 43. We agree that the UKLA should be able to require a sponsor to disclose to it documents or information which the UKLA needs in order to carry out its functions in relation to a sponsor. Q20: If not, how do you believe that the UKLA can maintain an appropriate standard across the sponsor community? 44. See our response to Q19. katerina.joannou@icaew.com The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales 2008 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced without specific permission, in whole or part, free of charge and in any format or medium, subject to the conditions that: it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context; the source of the extract or document, and the copyright of The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, is acknowledged; and the title of the document and the reference number (ICAEW Rep 94/08) are quoted. Where third-party copyright material has been identified application for permission must be made to the copyright holder. 11
CONSULTATION ON THE REVIEW OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE (DIRECTIVE 2003/71/EC)
10 March 2009 Our ref: ICAEW Rep 26/09 Directorate General Internal Market and Services Unit G3 - Securities Market European Commission Rue de Spa 2 1000 Brussels BELGIUM By email markt-g3@ec.europa.eu
More informationCP12/2 Amendments to the Listing Rules, Prospectus Rules, Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules
26 April 2012 Our ref: ICAEW Rep 52/12 Victoria Richardson Primary Markets Policy Financial Services Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS cp12_2@fsa.gov.uk Dear Ms Richardson CP12/2
More informationPROPOSED GOOD PRACTICE GUIDANCE: DEFINING AND DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE CODE OF CONDUCT
16th February 2007 Our ref: ICAEW Rep 03/07 Technical Manager Professional Accountants in Business Committee International Federation of Accountants 545 Fifth Avenue, 14 th floor New York, NY 10017 U.S.A
More information12 March Our ref: ICAEW rep 31/10. Your ref:
12 March 2010 Our ref: ICAEW rep 31/10 Your ref: Mr Jeroen Hooijer Head of the Financial Reporting Unit DG Internal Market and Services, MARKT F3 European Commission SPA 2/JII 01/112 B -1040 Brussels Belgium
More informationICAEW REPRESENTATION 131/14
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 131/14 Regulation of Auditors of Local Public Bodies ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the consultation document Regulation of Auditors of Local Public Bodies published
More informationICAEW REPRESENTATION 09/16
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 09/16 Regulatory Technical Standards on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the consultation paper Regulatory Technical Standards
More informationPREPARING AN AUDIT REPORT FOR QUALIFYING PARTNERSHIPS September 2018
ICAEW AUDIT AND ASSURANCE FACULTY HELPSHEET PREPARING AN AUDIT REPORT FOR QUALIFYING PARTNERSHIPS September 2018 This helpsheet was last updated in September 2018 and is based on the relevant laws and
More informationPlease contact me should you wish to discuss any of the points raised in the attached response.
31 January 2008 Our ref: ICAEW Rep 1/08 Hazel O Sullivan The Auditing Practices Board Limited 5 th Floor Aldwych House 71-91 Aldwych London WC2B 4HN By email: h.osullivan@frc-apb.org.uk Dear Hazel DRAFT
More informationVALUING NON-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK FOR COMPANY AND INVESTOR DIALOGUE
29 May 2009 Our ref: ICAEW Rep 46/09 Lloyds Banking Group 25 Gresham Street, London EC2V 7HN By email: John.Swannick@LloydsTSB.co.uk Dear John VALUING NON-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK FOR
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity Jadar Lithium Limited ABN / ARBN Financial year
More informationICAEW REPRESENTATION 76/15 (TAXREP 29/15)
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 76/15 (TAXREP 29/15) AUTOMATIC ENROLMENT ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the consultation document: Helping users of HMRC's Basic PAYE Tools undertake automatic enrolment
More informationRe: CESR's Advice on Level 2 Implementing Measures for the Prospectus Directive (July 2003)
30 October 2003 RH/VS Fabrice Demarigny Secretary General The Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) 11-13, Avenue de Friedland 75008 Paris France Dear M. Demarigny Re: CESR's Advice on Level
More informationICAEW REPRESENTATION 86/17
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 86/17 Anti-money laundering supervisory review: consultation ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the Anti-money laundering supervisory review: consultation published by HM
More informationStandards for Investment Reporting
January 2006 Standards for Investment Reporting 4000 INVESTMENT REPORTING STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO PUBLIC REPORTING ENGAGEMENTS ON PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION LIMITED The Auditing Practices Board Limited,
More informationGOING CONCERN MATERIAL UNCERTAINTY RELATED TO GOING CONCERN November 2018
ICAEW AUDIT AND ASSURANCE FACULTY HELPSHEET GOING CONCERN MATERIAL UNCERTAINTY RELATED TO GOING CONCERN November 2018 This helpsheet was last updated in November 2018 and is based on the relevant laws
More informationThe Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 30 June 2018 and has been approved by the board.
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Catalyst Metals Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 54 118 912
More informationCONFLICTS OF INTEREST POLICY HOTTINGER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST POLICY HOTTINGER INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT SUMMARY: OWNERS: This document represents Hottinger Investment Management Limited s (HIM) Conflicts of Interest Policy (the Policy). The Compliance
More informationConsultation on guidance on aspects of the ICAEW Code of Ethics
Consultation on guidance on aspects of the ICAEW Code of Ethics A document issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Comments from March 2016 (the Association of Chartered Certified
More informationThis corporate governance statement is current as at 28 September 2018 and has been approved by the Board.
CONNECTED IO LIMITED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT The Board is responsible for establishing the Company s corporate governance framework, they key features of which are set out below. In establishing
More informationBoard Charter. Page. Contents
1 Board Charter Contents Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Role and Objectives 2 3. Board Composition 2 4. Duties and Responsibilities 3 5. The Chairman 5 6. The Managing Director 6 7. Individual Directors 6 8.
More informationFor personal use only
Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Appendix 4G Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
More informationKey to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Nomad Building Solutions Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 52
More informationFor personal use only
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 31 MARCH 2017 Horseshoe Metals Limited s (the Company) Board of Directors (Board) is responsible for establishing the corporate governance framework of the Company and its
More information2018 Corporate Governance Statement
2018 Corporate Governance Statement The Board of Kidman Resources Limited (the Company) is responsible for the overall corporate governance of the Group. The Board believes that good corporate governance
More informationAustralian Agricultural Projects Ltd ABN:
Australian Agricultural Projects Ltd ABN: 19 104 555 455 Head Office Suite 2, 342 South Road Hampton East VIC 3188 E:admin@voopl.com.au APPENDIX 4G AND 2017 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT ANNOUNCEMENT
More informationICAEW REPRESENTATION 103/14
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 103/14 PROPOSED CHANGES TO CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE CODE ADDRESSING NON-ASSURANCE SERVICES FOR AUDIT CLIENTS ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the exposure draft Proposed
More informationKey to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Sun Resources NL ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 69 009 196 810 30
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Appendix 4G Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity CSL Limited ABN Financial year ended:
More informationSUMMARY OF: FSA Discussion Paper 06/05. FSA Confirmation of Industry Guidance
SUMMARY OF: FSA Discussion Paper 06/05 FSA Confirmation of Industry Guidance February 2007 Page 2 Summary of: FSA Discussion Paper 06/05 FSA Confirmation of Industry Guidance Introduction The move towards
More informationAuditing Practices Board
The Auditing Practices Board 117 Houndsditch London EC3A 7BT 18 October 2004 Mr Fabrice Demarigny Secretary General The Committee of European Securities Regulators 11-13 avenue de Friedland 75008 Paris
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Appendix 4G Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity TUNGSTEN MINING NL ABN / ARBN Financial
More informationAPES 320 QUALITY CONTROL FOR FIRMS
May 2006 ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONAL AND ETHICAL STANDARDS BOARD APES 320 QUALITY CONTROL FOR FIRMS (Effective as at 1 July 2006) CONTENTS Paragraphs Introduction 1-5 Definitions 6 Elements of a System of
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Appendix 4G Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity ZENITAS HEALTHCARE LIMITED ABN /
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Appendix 4G Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity Senex Energy Limited ABN / ARBN Financial
More informationConsultation Paper: Going public a director s guide
Consultation Paper: Going public a director s guide 17 November 2014 A public offering is a transformational event for an organisation. The process of preparing for, becoming, and being a public issuer
More informationBOARD CHARTER TOURISM HOLDINGS LIMITED
BOARD CHARTER TOURISM HOLDINGS LIMITED INDEX Tourism Holdings Limited ( thl ) - Board Charter 2 1. Governance at thl 2 2. Role of the Board 3 3. Structure of the Board 4 4. Matters Relating to Directors
More informationGuidance for audit committees. Evaluating your auditors
Guidance for audit committees Evaluating your auditors November 2003 The Combined Code on Corporate Governance July 2003 C.3 Audit Committee and Auditors Main Principle: The board should establish formal
More informationKey to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: K&S Corporation Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 67 007 561
More informationAUDIT FIRM GOVERNANCE
AUDIT FIRM GOVERNANCE A PROJECT FOR THE FINANCIAL REPORTING COUNCIL EVIDENCE GATHERING CONSULTATION PAPER Audit Firm Governance Working Group Chairman: Norman Murray October 2008 The ICAEW operates under
More informationALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
15 March 2011 Our ref: ICAEW Rep 31/11 Your ref: Consultation on ADR European Commission Consultation on ADR Directorate General Health and Consumers Avenue de Bourget 1-3 B-1140 Brussels (Evere) Belgium
More informationIAASB Main Agenda (July 2007) Page Agenda Item
IAASB Main Agenda (July 2007) Page 2007 1787 Agenda Item 5-C Proposed Disposition of the Present Tense and Other in the Proposed ISQC1 () I. Those That Have Been Elevated to a Requirement 8 Such communication
More informationJune The annexure includes a key to where our corporate governance disclosures can be located. Date: 25 September 2018
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Discovery Africa Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 50 147 324
More information22 May BIS/DfE Joint Apprenticeships Unit Department for Business Innovation & Skills Orchard 1 1 Victoria Street London SW1H 0ET
22 May 2013 BIS/DfE Joint Apprenticeships Unit Department for Business Innovation & Skills Orchard 1 1 Victoria Street London SW1H 0ET Response made via online survey. Dear Joint Apprenticeship Unit ICAEW
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Appendix 4G Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity Australia and New Zealand Banking
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Appendix 4G Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity King River Copper Limited ABN / ARBN
More informationCorporate Governance Statement 2017
Corporate Governance Statement 2017 Sound corporate governance and having the right structure, people, practices and policies in place is fundamental to ensuring Sanford s ability to create maximum value
More informationFor personal use only
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Name of entity: Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations AusCann Group Holdings Ltd ACN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 008 095
More informationThe Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 29 August 2018 and has been approved by the board.
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: AMA Group Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 50 133 883 560 30
More informationFor personal use only
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity ecargo Holdings Limited ABN / ARBN Financial
More informationThe Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 26 August 2016 and has been approved by the board.
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Senetas Corporation Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 33 00 606
More informationFor personal use only
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT Orinoco Gold Limited and the Board are committed to achieving and demonstrating the highest standards of corporate governance. The Board continues to review the framework
More informationRuralco Holdings Limited September 2017
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Ruralco Holdings Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 40 009 660
More informationJUNE The Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 24 August 2018 and has been approved by the Board.
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: BARRACK ST INVESTMENTS LIMITED ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 30 167
More informationAssistance Options to New Applicants and Sponsors in connection with Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Technical Bulletin - AATB 1 Issued March 2008 Technical Bulletin Assistance Options to New Applicants and Sponsors in connection with Internal Controls over Financial Reporting This Technical Bulletin
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations RNI NL June 2016
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: RNI NL ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 77 085 806 284 30 June 2016
More informationJuly This URL on our website:
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Specialty Fashion Group Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 43
More informationAppendix 4G. Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Appendix 4G Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity Gascoyne Resources Ltd ABN / ARBN
More informationICAEW REPRESENTATION 92/17
ICAEW REPRESENTATION 92/17 What are the implications of artificial intelligence? ICAEW welcomes the opportunity to comment on the call for evidence What are the implications of artificial intelligence?
More informationThis URL on our website: Company Profile Corporate Governance
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: MINREX RESOURCES LIMITED ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 81 151 185
More informationJune The Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 15 September 2017 and has been approved by the board.
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Qantas Airways Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 16 009 661 901
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity BHP Billiton Limited ABN / ARBN Financial year
More informationAudit & Risk Committee Charter
Audit & Risk Committee Charter Status: Approved Custodian: Executive Office Date approved: 2014-03-14 Implementation date: 2014-03-17 Decision number: SAQA 04103/14 Due for review: 2015-03-13 File Number:
More informationThe Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 26 September 2016 and has been approved by the board.
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: VITA GROUP LIMITED ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 62 113 178 519 30
More informationThe Corporate Governance Statement is accurate and up to date as at 22 September 2017 and has been approved by the board.
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: VITA GROUP LIMITED ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 62 113 178 519 30
More informationFor personal use only
On Q Group Limited CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 1. Introduction The Board of Directors of On Q Group Limited ( Company ) is responsible for the Company's corporate governance framework, as set out in
More informationEFFECTIVE COMPANY STEWARDSHIP: ENHANCING CORPORATE REPORTING AND AUDIT
31 March 2011 Our ref: ICAEW Rep 34/11 By email: effectivestewardship@frc.org.uk Mr Stephen Haddrill Chief Executive Financial Reporting Council 5 th Floor, Aldwych House 71-91 Aldwych London WC2B 4HN
More informationFor personal use only
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Freedom Insurance Group Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 14
More informationCorporate Governance Statement
Sunland Group Limited Shareholders information 30 June 2018 Corporate Governance Statement This statement reports against the 3rd edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
More informationCorporate Governance. For the year ended 30 June Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight
Governance For the year ended 30 June 2018 The Board of Directors of Smart Parking Limited ( SPZ ) is responsible for the corporate governance of the Company. The Board guides and monitors the business
More informationKey to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Name of entity Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations BrainChip Holdings Limited ABN/ARBN Financial year ended 151 159 812 31
More informationTPG Telecom Limited Corporate Governance Statement. Introduction
Introduction The Board of TPG Telecom Limited ( the Company ) determines the most appropriate corporate governance arrangements having regard to the best interests of the Company and its shareholders,
More informationCorporate Governance Statement
This statement outlines the Corporate Governance practices adopted by the Board of Directors for the financial year ending 30 September 2017. The Board of Aspermont Limited (Aspermont or the Company) is
More informationB&M EUROPEAN VALUE RETAIL S.A. TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE
B&M EUROPEAN VALUE RETAIL S.A. TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE These terms of reference have been approved by the board of directors (the "Board") of B&M European Value Retail S.A. (the
More informationKey to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Programmed Maintenance Services Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended:
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT The Company is committed to the pursuit of creating value for shareholders, while at the same meeting shareholders expectations of sound corporate governance practices. As
More informationFor personal use only
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity GME RESOURCES LIMITED ABN / ARBN Financial year
More informationThe Institute of Directors of South Africa ( IoDSA ) is the convener of the King Committee and the custodian of the King reports and practice notes.
ANDULELA INVESTMENT HOLDINGS LIMITED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Corporate Governance Overview December 2016 The Board of Directors is committed to the implementation of good corporate governance within the group
More informationThis URL on our website:
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: ZAMANCO MINERALS LIMITED ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 34 124 782
More informationAppendix 4G. Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Introduced 01/07/14 Amended 02/11/15 Name of entity Neuren Pharmaceuticals Limited ABN / ARBN Financial
More information2017 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT.
2017 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT. Dated: 21 February 2018 BELL FINANCIAL GROUP Bell Financial Group Limited (ASX:BFG) (Bell Financial) recognises the importance of good corporate governance. The ASX
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT In fulfilling its obligations and responsibilities to its various stakeholders, the Board is a strong advocate of corporate governance. This statement outlines the principal
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 20 17 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT Regis Healthcare Limited (Regis) has adopted the 3rd edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations released
More informationKey to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: Sayona Mining Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 26 091 951 978
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE. as at 12 September Lycopodium Limited ABN: Level 5, 1 Adelaide Terrace, East Perth Western Australia 6004
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE as at 12 September 2016 This document is the property of. It must not be copied or reproduced in any way or transmitted on to any third party without written authority from. ABN: 83
More informationThis URL on our website:
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: South32 Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 84 093 732 597 30 June
More informationJune This URL on our website: americanpacificborate.com/investor-centre/#corporate-governance
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: American Pacific Borate and Lithium Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year
More informationThis URL on our website:
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity: South32 Limited ABN / ARBN: Financial year ended: 84 093 732 597 30 June
More informationFarmaForce Limited (ACN ) Corporate Governance Statement
FarmaForce Limited (ACN 167 748 843) Corporate Governance Statement The Board of Directors of FarmaForce Limited ( FarmaForce or the Company ) is responsible for the corporate governance of the Company.
More informationCorporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations. Appendix 4G
Appendix 4G Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Introduced 01/07/14 Name of entity Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations ASSETOWL LIMITED ABN/ARBN Financial year ended 12
More informationStatement of Corporate Governance Practices 2016
Statement of Corporate Governance Practices 2016 Introduction The Board of Directors of Coventry Group Ltd (CGL) is responsible for the corporate governance of the Company. The practices outlined in this
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT The Directors and management of Afterpay Touch Group Limited ACN 618 280 649 (APT or the Company) are committed to conducting the business of the Company and its controlled
More informationKey to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Name of entity Key to Disclosures Council Principles and Recommendations Grange Resources Limited ABN/ARBN Financial year ended 80 009 132 405 31 December 2017 Our
More informationGuidance for audit committees. Monitoring the integrity of financial statements
Guidance for audit committees Monitoring the integrity of financial statements March 2004 The Combined Code on Corporate Governance July 2003 C.3 Audit Committee and Auditors Main Principle: The board
More informationKey to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Name of entity Santos Limited Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations ABN/ARBN Financial year ended 80 007 550 923 31 December
More informationAgreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board ISA 210 April 2009 International Standard on Auditing Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board International
More informationFor personal use only. Corporate Governance Statement 2018
For personal use only Corporate Governance Statement 2018 The Board of Directors ( Board ) of IMF Bentham Limited (ABN 45 067 298 088) ( IMF or Company ) is responsible for the corporate governance of
More informationA FRAMEWORK FOR AUDIT QUALITY. KEY ELEMENTS THAT CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT FOR AUDIT QUALITY February 2014
A FRAMEWORK FOR AUDIT QUALITY KEY ELEMENTS THAT CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT FOR AUDIT QUALITY February 2014 This document was developed and approved by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
More informationHUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE CHARTER
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE CHARTER Objective The objective of the Human Resources Committee is to assist the Board in discharging its duty to oversee the establishment of appropriate human resources policies
More informationCorporate Governance Statement
Corporate Governance Statement The Hydroponics Company Limited (the Company) provides the following statement disclosing the extent to which the Company has followed the Corporate Governance Principles
More informationISRS 4410 (Revised), Compilation Engagements
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Exposure Draft October 2010 Comments requested by March 31, 2011 Proposed International Standard on Related Services ISRS 4410 (Revised), Compilation
More information