TSI OPERATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT FINAL REPORT ON THE MERGING OF CONVENTIONAL RAIL AND HIGH SPEED TSIS
|
|
- Cory Park
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 INTEROPERABILITY UNIT RATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT FINAL REPORT ON THE MERGING OF CONVENTIONAL RAIL AND HIGH SPEED TSIS Reference: ERA/CON/ /INT Document type: Final report Version : 0.8 Date : Edited by Approved by Name Sandra Scheufens J-C. PICHANT Position Date & Signature INTEROPERABILITY Unit Project Officer INTEROPERABILITY Head of unit The following document has been produced by the European Railway Agency as final report and on the merging of the CR and HS and serves as Annex 1 to the recommendation ERA/REC/ on the merging of the CR and HS. It is currently in revision status with the WP.
2 Amendment record Version Date Section number Modification/description Author All IP, SaS All Update after 1 st meeting of WP SaS Annex : Working Program SaS All Update after 2 nd meeting of WP SaS Economic evaluation Introduction SaS All Update after comments from Sector organisations and NSAs All Update during the WP meeting with the sector organisations and NSAs All Update after comments from sector organisations and NSAs SaS SaS SaS 0.9 SaS 1.0 SaS 1.1 SaS 1.2 SaS 1.3 SaS 1.4 SaS 1.5 SaS
3 ANNEXES Annex Reference Version Date Author 1 2 ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 3 OF 17
4 TABLE OF CONTENT Amendment record INTRODUCTION SUBJECT REFERENCES, TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ABBREVIATION CARRYING OUT OF ACTIVITIES Working Parties set up for the revision of the CR Call for experts Working Program Working Procedures RESULTS Merging of TSIs OPE CR + HS Requirements for Signal and lineside marker sighting Interfaces to other TSIs Appendix T Extension of scope Staff and trains Corrections Requirements for Signal and lineside marker sighting ECONOMIC EVALUATION General CONSULTATION ACCORDING TO ARTICLES 4 AND 5 OF AGENCY REGULATION 881/2004/EC ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 4 OF 17
5 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. SUBJECT The Commission mandated ERA by the mandate on the extension of scope (Commission Decision C(2010)2576 of ) among other tasks to merge the CR and HS. The following document has been produced by the European Railway Agency as draft final report on the merging of the CR and HS and serves as Annex 1 to the recommendation on the merging of the CR and HS. It gives an overview about the work done, the process and conclusions of the merging and sets out the recommended amendments to the CR and HS. ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 5 OF 17
6 2. REFERENCES, TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 2.1. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS Ref. N Document Reference Official Journal Last amendment [1] Directive 2008/57/EC L 191, Directive 2009/131/EC (Interoperability) [2] Directive 2004/49/EC (Safety) L 164, Directive 2008/110/EC [3] TSI Traffic Operation and Management CR 2006/920/EC [4] TSI Traffic Operation and Management HS 2008/231/EC [5] Directive 2001/16/EC (Interoperability for TEN Conventional rail) [6] Directive 2001/14/EC (Train path allocation) [7] Directive 2008/68/EC (inland transport of dangerous goods) L359, Decision 2010/640/EU L84, Decision 2010/640/EU L110, Directive 2008/57/EC L75, Directive 2007/58/EC L260, Decision 2009/240/EC [8] Regulation (EC) 881/2004 (Agency Regulation) L 220, Regulation (EC) 1335/2008 ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 6 OF 17
7 2.2. ABBREVIATION Table 1 : Abbreviations Abbreviation IM NSA RU Definition Infrastructure Manager National Safety Authority Railway Undertaking ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 7 OF 17
8 3. Carrying out of activities 3.1 Working Parties set up for the revision of the CR ERA is mandated to merge the TSIs Operation and Traffic Management for conventional rail system and for high speed (Decision C(2010)2576 of ). ERA set up a draft Working Program. Based on this draft Working Program, ERA decided to call for one Working Party for the merging of the CR and HS: The coordination of works is done by ERA project officers. The Working Program has been set up according to the following principles: a) Due to the short timeframe assigned for the task of merging the two TSIs no substantial amendments will be discussed unless they are obvious errors. Issues needing a more detailed investigation and discussion will be taken into the working program for the 2nd revision of TSI OPE under the above-mentioned mandate. b) The TSIs OPE CR and HS are nearly identical. Some of the differences result in a recent review of the TSI for conventional rail that can be regarded as more up-to-date. In general the recently recommended revised CR shall be used as the basic text. c) If requirements differ between CR and HS it is checked if the requirement can be harmonised. If such alignment is not possible, the merged TSI will list the requirements for both types of lines with a clear indication of scope. d) During the merging the possibility of extension of scope of on the whole European network shall be discussed. If no due justification against can be found, it will be recommended to extend the scope of the. 3.2 Call for experts ERA sent out the call for experts for the Working Party on the 04/03/2010 and received several nominations; ERA is assisted by representatives of the Sector Organisations CER, EIM, ERFA, ETF, UIP and UNIFE as well as representatives of the NSAs AT, BE, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, IT, NL, NO, SE and UK in this Working Party. The Working Party had three meetings in 2010, all dedicated to the merging of CR and HS and the possible extension of scope. 3.3 Working Program ERA drafted a Working Program (Annex I) for the merging of the CR and HS (see also 3.1). This Working Program was discussed with the members of the Working Party. ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 8 OF 17
9 The draft Working Program was accepted by the members of the Working Party. It was also given to the European Commission, no objections were raised. 3.4 Working Procedures The subjects treated were discussed in the Working Party. The findings of the Working Party were discussed in the Sector Organisations and NSAs mirror groups. Each subject was finalised after the agreement of the members of the Working Party unless stated otherwise in chapter 4 of this report. The discussions of the subjects in ERA s Working Party have taken into account the conditions / inputs of the following documents: The HS (2008/231/EC[4]) The recommendation on a revision of CR (submitted to EC on ) and for the last meeting the revised CR as supported by RISC on , based on the recommendation The Safety Directive (2004/49/EC) The Interoperability Directives (2008/57/EC) The Train Path Allocation Directive (2001/14/EC) The CSM on conformity assessment The TSIs for other subsystems (Energy, Infrastructure, Rolling Stock, Control Command and Signalling, Safety in Railway Tunnels) Developments in the railway Sector 4. Results 4.1 Merging of TSIs OPE CR + HS During the first discussion the following points were identified as problematic: It was agreed to insert a distinction between conventional and high-speed lines in line with Annex I of the Interoperability Directive in case such a distinction is needed for diverging requirements Requirements for Signal and lineside marker sighting The text is currently written in such a way that it fits to conventional lines. For HS lines track side installed signs are not always applicable and cannot and do not need to be observed by the driver when running in cab signalling as the normal operational mode on that line. In order to open the requirement in a consistent way also to HS lines the text has been slightly modified: The driver must be able to observe lineside signals and markers, and they must be observable by the driver whenever applicable. The same applies for other types of lineside signs if they are safety related. ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 9 OF 17
10 4.3 Interfaces to other TSIs The interfaces to HS TSIs must be included in the merged. This is done in the revised TSI text. Appendix T One of the major problems seems to be the exchange of data for the required braking performance. After ERA had presented in RISC the preliminary recommendation on Annex T, France requested to introduce a requirement for the IMs: For train sets and fixed train compositions the IM shall deliver the braking performance requirements in deceleration values if so requested by the RU. This was accepted by ERA and introduced in the final recommendation for Annex T in 2009 and supported by RISC in February This requirement was supposed to ensure a future-oriented data exchange between IMs and RUs for passenger train sets. Unfortunately this seems not to be the case. Braking performance is still in an open point in the HS; it was discussed in order to see if the requirements stipulated for conventional rail can be extended to high speed. It was agreed that the principles laid down in Annex (Appendix) T can be extended also to high speed; but the question of the exchange unit for the braking performance requirements could not be concluded. EIM opposed to an extension of the requirement of delivering braking performance requirements in deceleration values for high speed. The reason is that the respective EN-standard/UIC-leaflet is not extended to speeds higher than 200 km/h today and distances are preferred by EIM. EIM prefers to deliver braking distances for high speed rather than deceleration values. CER referred to its position paper on the Annexes A and T of CR from May 2009, but CER supports the use of deceleration values also for high speed trains. After the meetings NSA ES informed ERA about being in favour of deceleration values for HS trains. It is understood that braking performance and its exchange values are such delicate issues that a thorough reflection an agreement between the sector organisations represented in the WP (especially EIM and CER) cannot be reached the within the time schedule of this WP on merging. It is agreed that the exchange of information on braking performance requirements is first of all an agreement between IM and RU as it is already today. Given the non-conclusive situation in the Working Party, ERA sees two possibilities for the recommendation on the merged TSIs OPE: the topic could be listed as open point according to Article 5 ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 10 OF 17
11 (6) of the Interoperability Directive [1] or to require an agreement between the two players affected by this requirement IM and RU. An open point would mean that the Member States need to notify technical rules according to Article 5(6). Due to the fact that it is allowed for IMs and RUs to agree on data exchange units for conventional rail as decided by the European Commission in Decision 2010/640/EU it seems not appropriate or constructive to give another solution for high speed rail than for conventional rail. ERA recommends requiring an agreement between IM and RU for high speed rail in Appendix T. The result can be summarised as follows: In order to ensure that for freight trains also in the next years brake weight percentage remains the common one, the text of the revised CR is limited to the CR network in the merged TSI. For high speed no standard unit is set out. An agreement between IM and RU is mandatory. It is strongly recommended to discuss this topic in more detail in the next revision of the. 4.2 Extension of scope The extension of scope was discussed in different aspects. Before coming to a common proposal, it was necessary to clarify some of the principles of the in connection with the Interoperability Directive: a) The correct application of the is not assessed by a Notified Body. The requirements concerning procedures are assessed within the procedures for granting any new or revised safety certificate or safety authorisation. The operational requirements on structural subsystems are referred to the structural TSIs which then set the detailed requirement and the assessment criteria for the Notified Body. b) This means that the compliance with operational requirements linked to structural subsystems need only to be fulfilled when the structural subsystem is assessed against a structural TSI according to chapter IV of the Interoperability Directive. c) This means that even after the extension of scope lines that are not renewed or upgraded do not need to fulfil requirements of the linked to structural requirements (e.g. a specific network not using ETCS or GSM-R does not need to modify its system of train running numbers to 8 digits as long as the numbers are unique in all relevant networks (CCS, operational, train radio, train position reporting)). Based on these principles the intermediate proposal for the extension of scope is: The scope of this TSI applies to the Operation and Traffic Management subsystem of Infrastructure Managers and Railway Undertakings related to the operation of trains on the European rail system as defined in Article 1. excluding the Lines / systems referred to in Article 1 (3) of Directive 2008/57/EC. ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 11 OF 17
12 The Working Party members as well as ERA feel the need to highlight here that a clear understanding of the definitions in Article 1(3) of the Interoperability Directive is highly relevant in order to ensure a common understanding between and in the Member States for the sake of correct implementation. EIM and ERFA expressed the opinion that due to the not fully transparent transposition of Article 1(3) they could not estimate the full impact of the extended TSI on some local lines with a minimum traffic. Nevertheless EIM and ERFA support in principle the extension of the scope of TSI as described in this report Staff and trains Currently the requirements for staff are applicable only to those staff members operating in crossborder traffic. As the requirements on train crew members other than drivers are currently under investigation under Article 28 of Directive 2007/59/EC, it was decided not to enter this subject in this revision cycle and not to extend the requirements on staff Front end One problem discussed was the subject of visibility of trains (front end signal). This requirement might create a problem for trains pushed on a regular basis. A typical example is a unit pushed on an open line in order to enter a siding. Apart from the fact that such movements should take place under special operational conditions (like reduced speed), it was concluded that such movements occur also on TEN-lines. Possible issues need to be solved already under the CR in force (2006/920/EC). This leads to the conclusion that no specific provisions are necessary in a TSI with scope extension as described above Timetables Another subject was the requirement on timetables. In some countries on lines without signalling system the driver receives a timetable with additional operational instructions. These operational instructions might include control command orders and permissions like Wait in station B until train 4600 has arrived. After arrival of train 4600 in B continue the travel to station C. Such operational instructions are used instead of a signalling system. They cannot be regarded as timetable information. It was concluded that such operational procedures are also possible under the. It must be stressed that IM and RU have to take care that all involved staff has the consistent operational rules and documentation. ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 12 OF 17
13 Furthermore it must be highlighted that the RU must take additional care in order to comply with the requirement of consistent presentation of the timetable. It might be useful to organise a basic common format for all types of lines and operational conditions and introducing an additional column or field for these additional operational instructions for the respective type of line or operating system. With such understanding of the requirement on the timetable no problem should raise within the extension of scope of the. 4.3 Corrections Requirements for Signal and lineside marker sighting The driver must be able to observe signals and lineside markers, and they must be observable by the driver whenever applicable. The same applies for other types of lineside signs if they are safety related. Lineside markers, signs and information boards must be designed in such a consistent way to facilitate this. Issues that must be taken into account include: that they are suitably sited so that train headlights allow the driver to read the information, suitability and intensity of lighting, where required to illuminate the information, where retro-reflectivity is employed, the reflective properties of the material used are in compliance with appropriate specifications and the signs are fabricated so that train headlights easily allow the driver to read the information. Driving cabs must be designed in such a consistent way that the driver is able to easily see the information displayed to him. NSA UK and EIM requested to cut details of the requirement (the bullet points) and to transfer it to the application guide. ERA accepts this proposal in order to harmonise the level of detail within the TSI requirements and recommends changing the TSI. 4.4 Other topics During the last meeting CER, NSAs UK and FR requested to change in the TSI text in different clauses from ensure to make sure depending on the different extents of tasks and responsibilities of the IM respective RU. ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 13 OF 17
14 ERA does not agree to change it in this revision because several discussions, some of them related to other recommendations and with other participants, showed very different understandings of the words ensure and make sure. 5. Economic Evaluation General An economic evaluation has been carried out on the merging of the CR and HS OPE TSIs according to the proportionality principle: this assessment is only qualitative. It is recognised that the merging of CR and HS OPE TSI is a very important step in terms of management of EU regulation, but with limited consequences for the railway sector itself in terms of costs and benefits. During the discussions on the merging it became clear that the various requirements in the TSIs OPE CR and HS are so close that a measurable impact of merging the requirements into one TSI is not relevant. The only exception detected is the requirement on the exchange of braking performance requirements between IM and RU (see chapter 4.1 on Annex T of this report). As it is recommended to require from IMs and RUs to agree on a unit for braking performance data on high-speed lines a relevant impact cannot be found. Also without such a requirement in the TSI the IMs and RUs have to communicate; the TSI requirement is in this case merely consolidating an existing fact. Apart from the merging of TSI, the potential impact of the extension of scope is to be assessed. Also this one has been made, according to the proportionality principle in a qualitative manner. The qualitative impact assessment takes mainly into account the assessment principles set out in the TSI itself. Procedures and processes required by the TSI need to be extended to the off-ten-lines that MS may not exclude under Article 1.3 of the Interoperability Directive. But an important principle of the TSI is the fact that it requires processes to be put in place that are appropriate for the different types of operation. The second principle of assessment focuses on the requirements on technical equipment stipulated in the. These refer via chapter 4.3 (interfaces) to structural TSIs while not imposing specific technical solutions in the. This means that a direct impact on technical equipment via the TSI OPE does not need to be taken into account because it is reflected in the assessment of the respective structural TSI. The following benefits were identified: - A single document to handle the numerous common aspects (about 95 % of the requirements) of the CR and HS OPE TSIs. - A single document obviously minimises the risk of inconsistency between different EU regulations on the same subject and their implementation as it was for example the case on two different Annexes P.5 after the Commission-Decision 2009/107/EC. ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 14 OF 17
15 - The existence of one decision covering the network instead of two TSIs with different scopes decreases the workload for the translation as well as notification and implementation plans for the Member States. 6. Consultation according to Articles 4 and 5 of Agency Regulation 881/2004/EC According to Articles 4 and 5 of the Agency Regulation 881/2004/EC, ERA shall consult the social partners as well as the organisations representing passengers and freight customers before submitting this recommendation to the European Commission. ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 15 OF 17
16 ANNEX I WORKING PROGRAM MERGING TSIS OPE CR + HS Working Program on merging TSIs OPE CR and HR According to the mandate of the European Commission the revision of the TSIs OPE shall be done in two steps: 1) Merging of TSIs CR + HS 2) Extension of scope + focus on harmonised operational rules ERA has to prepare and present a Working Program to RISC how to proceed under the mandate. First step In order to ensure a clear base of discussion and evaluation of the revision recommendations, we suggest the following Working Program for the first step, merging of TSIs CR + Hs: a. Merge the requirements in both TSIs. In case of differences, the text of the revised TSI CR is usually the target text. This is due to the fact that the TSI CR has been revised only recently and takes into account recent developments in European legislation. A preference for the requirements stipulated in the TSI HS shall be duly justified. A co-existence of different requirements for CR and HS system shall be avoided as much as possible (necessary e.g. in the list of interfaces to other TSIs). b. Identify the parameters which hinder or complicate an immediate extension of scope of the merged TSI. By answering this question in the first step it is possible to stabilise the frame of discussion for the second step. If no relevant elements are found hindering or complicating the extension of scope of the TSI an extension can be recommended for the first step. c. Update of clearly identified errors in TSIs CR and/or HS d. Update of links to European legislation Second step The second step would then focus on the revision and introduction of harmonised operational rules; taking into account the extended scope if possible. ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 16 OF 17
17 ANNEX I WORKING PROGRAM MERGING TSIS OPE CR + HS Merging TSIs OPE CR and HS in graphical time schedule Merging of TSIs CR and HS in the context of revisions scheduled Version 1.0 Date Author SaS ERA/CON/ /INT Version 0.8 PAGE 17 OF 17
TSI OPERATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT, CONVENTIONAL RAIL SYSTEM FINAL REPORT ON THE REVISION
INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TSI OPERATION AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT, CONVENTIONAL RAIL SYSTEM FINAL REPORT ON THE REVISION Reference: IU-OPE_final report Document type: Final report Version : 1.5 Date : 06.05.2010
More informationTowards an integrated European Railway Area
Towards an integrated European Railway Area Anders Lundström Oslo, 17 October 2007 Organisation chart of the Agency n 2 The legal basis for the Agency s work The Agency s tasks and, hence, its organisational
More informationSafety Regulation for Rail Sector in Europe
Safety Regulation for Rail Sector in Europe Roberto Piazza Safety Unit Moscow, 21 June 2007 1 Content 1. The legal basis and the main principles of safety regulation in the EU 2. The role of the European
More informationINTEROPERABILITY UNIT
INTEROPERABILITY UNIT STUDIES: 1) MERGING OF HS AND CR TSIS AND 2) SPLITTING OF THE Reference: ERA/REP/13-2011/INT Document type: Report Annex 3 Version of Annex 3: Date of Annex 3: 0.2 24 November 2010
More informationEUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TECHNICAL OPINION ON GERMAN MINISTRY NOTIFICATION REF. 41351 REFERENCE: IU-WAG- TO3 DOCUMENT TYPE: TECHNICAL OPINION VERSION: 1.0 DATE: 19/10/2009 Edited by
More informationERA TSI OPE Working document
EN EN EN ERA TSI OPE 2013 Working document concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the 'operation and traffic management' subsystem of the rail system in the European Union..
More informationMemorandum of Understanding (MoU)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) Between the European Commission and the European Railway Associations (CER UIC UNIFE EIM GSM-R Industry Group ERFA) concerning the strengthening of
More informationUncovering the technical specifications for interoperability as determined by the ERA to harmonise European safety standards
Uncovering the technical specifications for interoperability as determined by the ERA to harmonise European safety standards München, 12.09.2012, 4 th annual Fire Protection and Safety in Tunnels Content
More information11 th UIC Railway Noise Workshop
11 th UIC Railway Noise Workshop NOI TSI Revision Kamil Pravdík, Project Officer NOI TSI in general Directive (EU) 2016/797 (Interoperability Directive): technical specification for interoperability (TSI)
More informationRailway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC & Role of European Railway Agency (ERA)
Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC & Role of European Railway Agency (ERA) Dragan JOVICIC Safety Assessment Sector (Safety Unit) Slide n 1 Content of the presentation 1. Role of European Railway Agency
More informationDirective 96/48/EC - Interoperability of the trans- European high speed rail system
EN Directive 96/48/EC - Interoperability of the trans- European high speed rail system Technical Specification for Interoperability "Operations and traffic management" Sub-System - 1 / 155 - 1. INTRODUCTION
More informationDraft delegated act for the TSI revision
Brussels, 07 October 2016 Draft delegated act for the TSI revision 1 CER aisbl - COMMUNITY OF EUROPEAN RAILWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANIES Avenue des Arts, 53-1000 Bruxelles T: +32 (0)2 213 08 70 F: +32
More informationRECOMMENDATIONS. (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/897/EU)
12.12.2014 L 355/59 RECOMMDATIONS COMMISSION RECOMMDATION of 5 December 2014 on matters related to the placing in service and use of structural subsystems and vehicles under Directives 2008/57/EC and 2004/49/EC
More informationGE/GN8640. Risk Evaluation and Assessment. Guidance on Planning an Application of the Common Safety Method on. Rail Industry Guidance Note
GN Published by: Block 2 Angel Square 1 Torrens Street London EC1V 1NY Copyright 2014 Rail Safety and Standards Board Limited GE/GN8640 Method on Risk Evaluation and Assessment Issue One; June 2014 Rail
More informationINTEROPERABILITY UNIT COMPLEMENTARY STUDY INTERCHANGEABLE SPARE PARTS
INTEROPERABILITY UNIT COMPLEMENTARY STUDY INTERCHANGEABLE SPARE PARTS Reference: ERA/REP/10-2011/INT Document type: Final Report Version: 3 Date: 26 September 2011 Edited by Checked by Approved by Name
More informationEvaluation of the way in which national safety rules are published and made available Annex 20 Country report for Portugal
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY Safety Unit Evaluation of the way in which national safety rules are published and made available Reference: /INF/04-2009/SAF Version: 1.0 Date: 22 November 2010 Status: Final Author:
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
L 320/8 Official Journal of the European Union 17.11.2012 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1078/2012 of 16 November 2012 on a common safety method for monitoring to be applied by railway undertakings, infrastructure
More informationEuropean Railway Agency SIAFI
European Railway Agency SIAFI 2007 23.04.2007 At the beginning Establishment of the Agency The first proposal for establishment of the European Railway Agency was made by the Commission on 23 January 2002
More informationGuide for the application of Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs)
European Railway Agency Guide for the application of Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs) According to Framework Mandate C(2007)3371 final of 13/07/2007 Reference in ERA: ERA/GUI/07-2011/INT
More informationRECOMMENDATION FOR USE RFU-CCS-077
Page 1 of 9 TITLE CERTIFICATES WITH RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE ORIGINATOR ALTRAN, CERTIFER, SINTEF, VŮŽ SUBJECT RELATED TO SUBSYSTEM CCO AND CCT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND EXPLANATION Introduction
More informationCommon Safety Targets and Common Safety Methods for the railway systems in Europe
Common Safety Targets and Common Safety Methods for the railway systems in Europe C.Cassir- ERA 4th session of WG «Standardised Risk Analysis» in Switzerland Bern- Page n 1 First, a few words on the ERA
More informationGuide for the application of Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs) Annex 2 Conformity assessment and EC verification
European Railway Agency Guide for the application of TSIs European Railway Agency Guide for the application of Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs) Annex 2 Conformity assessment and EC
More informationBiennial Report on the Progress with Railway Interoperability in the European Union
29 Biennial Report on the Progress with Railway Interoperability in the European Union Foreword This is the first report on the progress with railway interoperability in the European Union which the
More informationGuide for the application of the TSI for the Subsystems Control-Command and Signalling Track-side and On-board
CCS TSI Application Making the railway system work better for society. European Union Agency for Railways for the application of the TSI for the Subsystems Control-Command and Signalling Track-side and
More informationGetting new trains on track
Fourth railway package Getting new trains on track Dr. Josef Doppelbauer, Executive Director, European Union Agency for Railways (ERA), Valenciennes, France At the end of the three-year implementation
More informationDraft working document
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT DIRECTORATE B EUROPEAN MOBILITY NETWORK Single European Rail Area Draft working document Communication of draft technical regulations
More informationSatellite services for a modern EU railway system. Roma, April 18 th 2013 Angelo Chiappini
Satellite services for a modern EU railway system Roma, April 18 th 2013 Angelo Chiappini Overview What is the European Railway Agency Main objectives for a modern railway system Opportunities for space
More informationThe rail sector associations have jointly reflected upon the current framework within which safety and interoperability legislation is produced.
Mr Siim Kallas Vice President of the European Commission European Commission B 1049 Brussels Belgium Brussels, 11 March 2010 Dear Mr Vice President, The rail sector associations have jointly reflected
More informationNSA Monitoring. Making the railway system work better for society. Annex III bis: Referential Compliance Audit NSA Monitoring
NSA Monitoring Making the railway system work better for society. NSA Monitoring 120 Rue Marc Lefrancq BP 20392 FR-59307 Valenciennes Cedex 1 / 23 Making the railway system work better for society. This
More informationExplanatory Note on the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN- G of on the CSM for risk assessment
Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in UTP GEN- Explanatory note on the CSM Assessment Body referred to in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 (1) and in UTP GEN-G of 1.1.2016 (2) on the Common Safety Method (CSM) for
More informationERTMS UNIT TRANS-EUROPEAN RAIL SYSTEM SUBSYSTEM CONTROL-COMMAND AND SIGNALLING
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY ERTMS UNIT Reference: ERA/ERTMS/034171 Document type: Technical Specification for Interoperability Version : final draft 1.1 Date : 13/01/2011 Edited by Quality review Approved
More informationExplanatory Note on the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN- G of on the CSM for risk assessment
Explanatory note on the CSM Assessment Body referred to in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 (1) and in UTP GEN-G of 1.1.2016 (2) on the Common Safety Method (CSM) for risk assessment Author : Dragan JOVICIC
More informationExplanatory Note on the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN- G of on the CSM for risk assessment
Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in UTP GEN- Explanatory note on the CSM Assessment Body referred to in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 (1) and in UTP GEN-G of 1.1.2016 (2) on the Common Safety Method (CSM) for
More informationStrategic Direction for revised Infrastructure TSI. Issue 1.0
Strategic Direction for revised Infrastructure TSI Issue 1.0 Approved by the Industry Standards Coordination Committee 22 July 2011 ISCC/012 Copyright 2011 Rail Safety and Standards Board Limited Issue
More information***I POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2004 2009 Consolidated legislative document 23.4.2009 EP-PE_TC1-COD(2008)0247 ***I POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT adopted at first reading on 23 April 2009 with a view to the adoption
More informationThe European Framework for Vehicle Authorisation
The European Framework for Vehicle Authorisation Torben Holvad 13th Annual Fire Protection of Rolling Stock Conference, 1-2 nd March 2017, Berlin, Germany Content of presentation Brief background about
More informationEuropean Railway Agency. Application Guide. Rue Marc Lefrancq, 120 BP F Valenciennes Cedex France Application guide Published
European Railway Agency Part 1 of the Reference Document envisaged by Article 27 of the Railway Interoperability Directive Application Guide Reference in ERA: ERA/GUI/XA Version in ERA: 3.0 Date: 30/10/2015
More informationRolling stock approval process
Rolling stock approval process Presentation to SEETO Working Group by Frank Walenberg Skopje 9 November 2010 1 Overview Need for the approval process RST approval process in the past Interoperability:
More informationEvaluation of the way in which national safety rules are published and made available Annex 26 Country report for United Kingdom
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY Safety Unit Evaluation of the way in which national safety rules are published and made available Reference: /INF/04-2009/SAF Version: 1.0 Date: 22 November 2010 Status: Final Author:
More informationEE UNIT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REGISTER OF INFRASTRUCTURE
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY EE UNIT IMPACT ASSESSMENT REGISTER OF INFRASTRUCTURE Reference: EE-IA-RINF-V10 Document Type: Draft Report Version : 1.0 Date : 31/03/2010 Edited by Reviewed by Approved by Name
More information1 Introduction. 2 Abbreviations and Definitions
1 Introduction This Guideline is intended to give guidance and explanation on the related European legal provisions for the Certification of ECMs. It cannot replace additional self study of the applicable
More informationCatalogue of examples
Making the railway system work better for society. Examples for the practical arrangements for the vehicle authorisation process Name E. DEL RIO G.TURNER S. YOUNG Drafted by Validated by Approved by H.
More informationUITP EU Committee Position on the ERA Draft Final Report. IU-ExtScope FinalReport. on the Extension of field of application of TSIs
Brussels, 22 April 2009 UITP EU Committee Position on the ERA Draft Final Report IU-ExtScope-20090320-FinalReport dated 20th March 2009 on the Extension of field of application of TSIs The UITP European
More informationApplication Guide for the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN-G of on the CSM for risk assessment
Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in UTP GEN-G 1 2 Application guide for the CSM Assessment Body referred to in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in UTP GEN-G of 1.1.2014 on the Common Safety Method (CSM) for
More informationRULES FOR REGISTRATION OF A VEHICLE KEEPER MARKING CODE (VKM)
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY (ERA) AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATION FOR INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY RAIL (OTIF) RULES FOR REGISTRATION OF A References: ERA: IU-VKM-061128 OTIF: A 94-06/3.2006 Document type:
More informationGuide for the application of the CR INF TSI
European Railway Agency According to Framework Mandate C(2007)3371 final of 13/07/2007 Reference in ERA: ERA/GUI/07-2011/INT Version in ERA: 1. 00 Date: 26 August 2011 Document elaborated by Document Type:
More informationExplanatory Note on the CSM Assessment Body in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in OTIF UTP GEN-G of on the CSM for risk assessment
Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in UTP GEN-G Explanatory note on the CSM Assessment Body referred to in Regulation (EU) N 402/2013 and in UTP GEN-G of 1.1.2014 on the Common Safety Method (CSM) for risk
More informationImpact of interoperability on the global railway network. L. Tordai, UIC, Paris, France
Impact of interoperability on the global railway network L. Tordai, UIC, Paris, France Introduction There are big changes happening in Europe s railways. Interoperability is already becoming a reality.
More informationEUMedRail Project - Kick-off Meeting Harmonised Regulation and Standards for Operations and Driver Training
EUMedRail Project - Kick-off Meeting Harmonised Regulation and Standards for Operations and Driver Training 25/10/2017, Brussels Interoperability Unit I. Train Drivers DIRECTIVE 2007/59/EC OF THE EUROPEAN
More informationTHE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM Guide for the application of the high-speed TSIs of Council Directive 96/48/EC
THE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM Guide for the application of the high-speed TSIs of Council Directive 96/48/EC THE TRANS-EUROPEAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM Guide for the application of the high-speed
More informationEuropean Railway Agency. Impact Assessment Report
European Railway Agency ERA studies: STUDIES: 1) MERGING OF HS AND CR TSIS AND 2) SPLITTING OF THE TRANSVERSAL TSIS Impact Assessment Report Reference: (filename) Document type: Final report Version :
More information13/12/2012 Page 1 Rule Management Tool ver 1
13/12/2012 Page 1 Rule Management Tool ver 1 1 type 1-rule 2 type 1-rule 3 type 1-rule concerning existing national safety targets concerning existing national safety methods concerning existing national
More information3. OBJECTIVES PURSUED BY THIS WORK PROGRAMME AND THE FUNDING PRIORITIES:
3. OBJECTIVES PURSUED BY THIS WORK PROGRAMME AND THE FUNDING PRIORITIES: 3.1.3. Rail interoperability including interoperability of the Rail Freight Corridors Priority open only to the Cohesion Member
More informationAnnex II: Evaluation Procedure
Making the railway system work better for society. NSA Monitoring 1 / 22 Procedure Evaluation procedure for the NSA monitoring activity Document Type: Procedure Origin: ERA Document ID: Activity Based
More informationCID Book 1. Generalities
CID Book 1 Generalities Harmonised text proposal 2019 timetable year Version control Version Chapter changed Changes compared to the previously published version X marks which part in the chapter concerned
More informationLight Impact Assessment
EUROPEAN UNION AGENCY FOR RAILWAYS O11REC1O28 V1.O Making the railway system work better for society. Light Impact Assessment 4th Railway Package Revision of CCS TSI 120 Rue Marc Lefrancq I BP 20392 ER-59307
More information3. OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES:
3. OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES: 3.1. Priorities related to bridging missing links, removing bottlenecks, enhancing rail interoperability, and, in particular, improving cross-border sections 3.1.4. European
More informationThe TAP TSI Legal Framework and implementation strategy
Twelfth UIC ebusiness Conference - Passenger Workshop The TAP TSI Legal Framework and implementation strategy by Ugo Dell Arciprete Paris, 23 October 2008 TAP TECHNICAL STANDARDS INTEROPERABILITY COMPETITION
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 153/9
14.6.2007 Official Journal of the European Union L 153/9 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 653/2007 of 13 June 2007 on the use of a common European format for safety certificates and application documents
More informationRID 2015 Impact for the wagon keepers
1 RID 2015 Impact for the wagon keepers 2 RID 2015 Text of RID 2015 is available on the internet sites of OTIF (F, D, EN) and SPF Mobility (F, NL) : http://www.otif.org/en/publications/rid-2015.html http://www.mobilit.belgium.be/fr/traficferroviaire/ssicf/ma
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2008D0163 EN 24.01.2013 002.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COMMISSION DECISION of 20 December 2007 concerning
More informationDIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/798 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 May 2016 on railway safety (recast) (OJ L 138, , p.
02016L0798 EN 26.05.2016 000.001 1 This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2004L0049 EN 30.07.2014 003.002 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B C1 DIRECTIVE 2004/49/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
More informationINTEROPERABILITY UNIT
INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TAF TSI - ANNEX A.5 :FIGURES AND SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS OF THE TAF TSI REFERENCE: ERA-TD-100 DOCUMENT TYPE: TECHNICAL DOCUMENT VERSION: 2.1 TAF TSI DATE: 10.02.2015 ERA_TECHNICAL_DOCUMENT_TAF_A_INDEX5_20130515_V2_1.DOC
More informationORR guidance on the application of the common safety method (CSM) on risk evaluation and assessment
ORR guidance on the application of the common safety method (CSM) on risk evaluation and assessment December 2012 1. 1 2. Second edition published by the Office of Rail Regulation, December 2012 This guidance
More informationEvaluation of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of 29 April 2004 establishing the European Railway Agency
Evaluation of the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of 29 April 2004 establishing the European Railway Agency Results of the stakeholder analysis Public seminar Friday, 10 th December 2010
More informationBoosting International Rail Freight. Sector Statement on Rail Freight Corridors
Boosting International Rail Freight Sector Statement on Rail Freight Corridors Brussels, 20 May 2016 1 Sector Statement on Rail Freight Corridors: Boosting International Rail Freight 20 May 2016 - final
More informationStrategic Direction for revised Locomotive and Passenger Rolling Stock (LOC&PAS) TSI. Issue 1.0
Strategic Direction for revised Locomotive and Passenger Rolling Stock (LOC&PAS) TSI Issue 1.0 Approved by the Industry Standards Coordination Committee 22 July 2011 ISCC/010 Copyright 2011 Rail Safety
More informationINTEROPERABILITY UNIT
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TAF TSI - ANNEX A.5 :FIGURES AND SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS OF THE TAF TSI REFERENCE: ERA-TD-100 DOCUMENT TYPE: TECHNICAL DOCUMENT VERSION: 2.0 (DRAFT) TAF TSI DATE:
More information(Text with EEA relevance)
L 356/438 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1305/2014 of 11 December 2014 on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the telematics applications for freight subsystem of the rail system
More informationEuropean Railway Agency. Impact Assessment Report. Single Safety Certificate
Impact Assessment Report Reference: ERA/EE/xxxxx Document type: Draft Version : 0.3 Date : 21.12.2011 Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by Name T. Holvad K. Davies, L. McDaid, B. Accou, T. Breyne A. Magnien
More informationErnest Godward, EU Agency for Railways. Rail Freight in the European Union
Ernest Godward, EU Agency for Railways Rail Freight in the European Union A European Rail Freight is facing multiple challenges Organising rail freight is time-consuming Rail freight customers often experience
More informationCHANNEL TUNNEL SAFETY AUTHORITY WORK PLAN 2016
SUPERVISION (INSPECTION AND AUDIT) CHANNEL TUNNEL SAFETY AUTHORITY WORK PLAN 2016 RESCUE & PUBLIC SAFETY WORKING GROUP Fire detection systems ageing equipment infrastructure Emergency response safety Review
More informationVehicle Registration, Marking and Numbering
Vehicle Registration, Marking and Synopsis This document sets out requirements for the registration, marking and numbering of rail vehicles operating on the Great Britain (GB) mainline network. Copyright
More informationINTEROPERABILITY UNIT
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY UNIT TAF TSI - ANNEX D.2 : APPENDIX B - WAGON AND INTERMODAL UNIT OPERATING DATABASE (WIMO) REFERENCE: ERA-TD-102 DOCUMENT TYPE: TECHNICAL DOCUMENT VERSION: 2.0
More informationTransitions Between Signalling Systems
Rail Industry Standard RIS-0036-CCS Issue One Date December 2016 ` Transitions Between Signalling Systems Synopsis This standard sets out the requirements for managing the transition between running lines
More informationon a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining a railway safety authorisation
COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No./. of on a common safety method for assessing conformity with the requirements for obtaining a railway safety authorisation (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN
More informationSIS Directory Accreditation number: SIS 0130
International standard: ISO/IEC 17020:2012 Swiss standard: SN EN ISO/IEC 17020:2012 SCONRAIL AG Zürcherstrasse 41 8400 Winterthur Head: Heiko Germroth Responsible for MS: Heiko Germroth Telephone: +41
More informationRECOMMENDATION FOR USE
Page 1 of 5 TITLE Scope of Assessment Requirements for Conformity Assessment by NoBos ORIGINATOR Luxcontrol Nederland B.V 2008/57/EC 2010/713/EU 765/2008 768/2008 SUBJECT RELATED TO DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
More informationAssurance provided by a second pair eyes (RASBO) of the correct Safe integration by the proposer of a new or modified Rolling Stock
Quality & Safety for Systems & Software Railway Engineering Assurance provided by a second pair eyes (RASBO) of the correct Safe integration by the proposer of a new or modified Rolling Stock Ir. Marc
More informationQUESTION / CLARIFICATION
QUESTION / CLARIFICATION CO-ORDINATION BETWEEN NOTIFIED BODIES INTEROPERABILITY DIRECTIVE AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS ON THE INTEROPERABILITY OF THE RAIL SYSTEM WITHIN THE UNION QC-RST-015 Issue 02 Date:
More informationINTERNAL AUDIT. Application guide for the design and implementation of a Railway Safety Management System. EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY Safety Unit
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY Safety Unit Application guide for the design and implementation of a Railway Safety Management System INTERNAL AUDIT ERA/GUI/04-2011/SAF Version 2 24/05/2011 Version Control Document
More informationTAF TSI revision - recommendation Working Group on TELEMATICS in the transport of dangerous goods. Bordeaux,
TAF TSI revision - recommendation Working Group on TELEMATICS in the transport of dangerous goods Bordeaux, 03.06.2014 Directive 2008/57/EC says: Annex II - 2.5: Telematics Applications: TAF TSI Legal
More information1. Name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and Internet address of the European Railway Agency
EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY CALL FOR APPLICATIONS TO ESTABLISH A LIST OF PROSPECTIVE INDEPENDENT EXPERTS TO ASSIST THE WORK OF THE WORKING PARTIES OF THE EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY IN THE FIELD OF RAILWAY INTEROPERABILITY
More informationM1 DIRECTIVE 2001/16/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the conventional rail system
2001L0016 EN 30.04.2004 001.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B M1 DIRECTIVE 2001/16/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
More informationThe 3 sheets: Back Info-General, Back Info - Roles and Resps, and Back Info - Timeframe shall be filled in with the relevant information.
Background information The 3 sheets: Back Info-General, Back Info - Roles and Resps, and Back Info - Timeframe shall be filled in with the relevant information. The cells coloured in: are those to be filled
More information(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
11.12.2010 Official Journal of the European Union L 327/13 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1169/2010 of 10 December 2010 on a common safety method for assessing conformity
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
2007L0059 EN 15.07.2014 001.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B DIRECTIVE 2007/59/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
More informationGuidance on Independent Assessment. Rail Industry Guidance Note. Published by: RSSB Block 2 Angel Square 1 Torrens Street London EC1V 1NY
GN Published by: Block 2 Angel Square 1 Torrens Street London EC1V 1NY Copyright 2014 Rail Safety and Standards Board Limited GE/GN8645 Issue One: June 2014 Rail Industry Guidance Note Issue record Issue
More informationChapter changed. V1 all layout X
RFC North Sea Baltic Corridor Information Document Book 1 Generalities Timetable 2019 Version control Version Chapter changed Changes compared to the previously published version X marks which part in
More informationTelematic Applications for Freight (TAF TSI)
Telematic Applications for Freight (TAF TSI) OSJD UNESCAP Regional Meeting on Harmonization of Rules and Regulations for Facilitation of International Railway Transport Astana (Kazakhstan), 20 21 December
More informationERTMS/ETCS DMI National Requirements
ERTMS/ETCS DMI National Synopsis This document mandates requirements for ERTMS/ETCS Driver Machine Interface (DMI) equipment if a speed display in miles per hour is required and/or alphanumeric train running
More information4 th Railway Package Implementation of the Technical Pillar
4 th Railway Package Implementation of the Technical Pillar 10 th PRIME Plenary Meeting, Sopron, 12 June 2017 Josef Doppelbauer, ERA Executive Director Is There a Future for Rail? 2 Key Elements of the
More informationRECOMMENDATION FOR USE
Page 1 of 11 CONTENT OF THE TECHNICAL FILE TITLE ORIGINATOR SUBJECT RELATED TO NB-RAIL STRATEGY SG Directive 2008/57/EC (incl. all amendments esp. 2014/106/EU), Recommendation 2014/897/EU, Decision 2010/713/EU
More informationRailway interoperability. Academic perspective
Railway interoperability. Academic perspective Ernesto García Vadillo (Prof) Department of Mechanical Engineering University of The Basque Country (UPV/EHU) Brussels, 7th May 2013 1 Contents 1. Directive
More informationFurther information on the legislation can be found in all EU languages on EUR-LEX website:
Making the railway system work better for society. 4 th Railway Package What is the 4 th Railway Package and its technical pillar? The 4 th Railway Package is a set of legislative texts designed to complete
More informationDissemination of the Commission Regulation (EC) No 352/2009/EC on Common Safety Method on Risk Evaluation and Assessment
Dissemination of the Commission Regulation (EC) No 352/2009/EC on Common Safety Method on Risk Evaluation and Assessment Maria Antova, Dragan Jovicic, and Thierry Breyne European Railway Agency, Safety
More informationANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT OF COORDINATOR KAREL VINCK ERTMS PROJECT. Brussels. August 2008
ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT OF COORDINATOR KAREL VINCK ERTMS PROJECT Brussels August 2008 This report only represents the opinion of the European coordinator and does not prejudge the official position of the
More informationThe 3 sheets: Back Info-General, Back Info - Roles and Resps, and Back Info - Timeframe shall be filled in with the relevant information.
Background information The 3 sheets: Back Info-General, Back Info - Roles and Resps, and Back Info - Timeframe shall be filled in with the relevant information. The cells coloured in: are those to be filled
More informationThe 3 sheets: Back Info-General, Back Info - Roles and Resps, and Back Info - Timeframe shall be filled in with the relevant information.
Background information The 3 sheets: Back Info-General, Back Info - Roles and Resps, and Back Info - Timeframe shall be filled in with the relevant information. The cells coloured in: are those to be filled
More information