Indicative content of evaluation final reports Draft, Jérémie Toubkiss, Evaluation Office, NYHQ (updated 4 February 2016)
|
|
- Isabella Jenkins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Indicative content of evaluation final reports Draft, Jérémie Toubkiss, Evaluation Office, NYHQ (updated 4 February 2016) 0. Opening pages - The first pages provides the key information on the programme evaluation 0.1 Name and timeframe of the evaluated programme 0.2 Name of the country (and regions) 0.3 Type of evaluation (mid-term, final, etc.) 0.4 Name of the commissioning agency 0.5 Authors of the report (institution, names of individuals) 0.6 Date of the evaluation report 0.7 Status of the report (draft, final ) 0.8 Table of content 0.9 List of acronyms 0.10 List of tables and figures 0.11 Executive summary presenting only the following information that are intended to decision makers and senior management (max 5 pages, can stand-alone): 0.12 Brief description of the evaluated programme 0.13 Evaluation purpose, objectives, criteria, scope 0.14 Methodology (list of main data source, collection methods, triangulation approach, equity lens, ethical aspects, and main limitations) to 3 key findings and the overall conclusion on the programme performance for each evaluation criteria to 3 key lessons learnt to 4 priority recommendations (urgent, strategic or easy-to-implement) by stakeholder 1. Context and objectives of the evaluation - The report includes sufficient and relevant contextual information, and explains relevance and usefulness of the evaluation Context of the evaluation and description of the evaluated programme The ToR adequately describes the particular policy, social, economic, governance and programmatic environment of the country/region/area and of the programme/project/intervention to be evaluated, in a way that illuminates/contextualize the findings Purpose and specific objectives of the programme/project/intervention to be evaluated, and its theory of change or logical framework, which should be well articulated (can be revised/updated by the evaluator) Main assumptions/hypotheses and risks associated with the theory of change or logframe (based on the programme documents or on the evaluator's analysis) Timeframe of the programme/project/intervention: starting and end dates (or implementation status); milestones in the project history; timing of the evaluation within the project management cycle Geographical boudanies: number and name of regions and districts; rural/small towns/peri-urban/urban areas Key stakeholders and their respective roles (UNICEF, government counterparts, implementing partners, service providers, beneficiaries) Financial aspects (amount and origin of funds, future financing prospects...) Existing knowledge and evidence on the programme/project/intervention (previous, on-going and planned evaluations & studies, incl. findings from previous evaluation or evaluations of similar interventions), knowledge gaps and added-value of this evaluation Aspects of complexity or characteristics that can potentially make the evaluation work difficult, e.g. absence of logframe, of baseline, of M&E system, changes in program objectives, strategy or implementation over time, multiplicity of actors, multiplicity of program components, complexity of the policy, institutional, cultural or security context etc Purpose and objectives of the evaluation Purpose of the evaluation (transparency & accountability; learning for decision making; advocacy etc.) Specific objectives of the evaluation specified and coherent with purpose Who has commissioned / initiatied the evaluation (UNICEF, donor, etc.) Primary and secondary audiences for the evaluation Why evaluation is being done at this time and how the evaluation will be useful (intended use, incl. what decisions might likely be influenced by the findings of this evaluation) 1
2 2. Methodology - The report adequately defines the criteria that have been utilized to guide the evaluation, the evaluation questions, the scope of the evaluation, the methodology used for data collection and analysis, and the overall organisation of the evaluation work Evaluation criteria Evaluation criteria used such as: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness (incl. cost-effectiveness or value for money), impact, and/or sustainability - and additional evaluation criteria if any (equity, gender, disability, vulnerable / deprived segment of the population, human/children rights-based approach, results based management, robustness of the monitoring-evaluation-accountabilitylearning system, innovation, humanitarian principles, quality of process, exportability / potential for scaling up, added-value, coherence Why some standard evaluation criteria may not have been used Definition of each evaluation criteria used Description and justification of any change made to what was foreseen in the ToR 2.2. Evaluation questions Final evaluation questions and by who and how they have been chosen and formulated (incl. any change made to the ones proposed in the initial ToR, for example knowledge gaps identified during the initial document review and recommendations drawn from previous evaluations & studies) Sub-questions or hypothesis to be tested, if any Description and justification of any change made to what was foreseen in the ToR 2.3. Scope of the evaluation Components of the programme/project/intervention that have been evaluated (and what was excluded or impossible to evaluate) Geographical coverage of the evaluation (with map comparing intervention areas with areas visited) Time boundaries of the evaluation (or phase in the project) Activities funded by specific donors (if relevant) Stakeholders and beneficiaries included / excluded Description and justification of any change made to what was foreseen in the ToR 2.4. Evaluation design, and methodology for data collection and analysis Conceptual framework and evaluation design (non-experimental, quasi-experimental, experimental) Overall methodology: quantitative, qualitative, participatory, self-evaluation where the evaluation team will play a facilitation role only, utilization-focused, theory-based, etc Data to be collected for each evaluation question Data source: M&E data generated by the evaluated programme; documents reviewed (number and list in annex) and their credibility, stakeholders consulted (program staff; implementing partners such as gov, NGOs, and consultants; contractors such as construction companies and engineering firms; direct and indirect beneficiaries (specify any focus on sex, age, religion, ethnic group, professional occupation, poverty level, vulnerability status...); external partners or resource persons (other NGOs, donors, universities and researchers...) etc Triangulation plan: how key information have been triangulated Methods used to collect each data from each data source: semi-structured interviews, focus-group discussions, problem tree/analysis, community mapping, document review, field observation, surveys, measures/tests, case studies / monography, etc Description and justification of any change made to what was foreseen in the ToR Description of data collection instruments used (actual tools in annex) Sample size and sampling method (for key informants, implementing partners, beneficiaries, intervention sites) Training of enumerators' and pilot testing of survey tools (if applicable) Supervision of & support provided to enumerators' Other methods used for quality assurance of collected data Data analysis methods: how data have be coded, displayed, processed, aggregated, synthetized, compared use of quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods; basis for jugment (subcriteria, performance indicators, benchmarks, standards, comparisons etc.); how Unicef's contribution to results has been assessed e.g. causal contribution analysis, rival hypothesis etc To what extend the evaluation has been participatory (involving stakeholders including beneficiary at every stage of the evaluation, from design to formulation of recommendations) How aspects of complexity have been addressed 2.5. Equity aspects How equity and gender have been taken into account 2
3 2.6. Ethical aspects Identification of ethical issues throughout the evaluation project as well as the measures and methods adopted to mitigate against these issues: methods or practices to ensure the avoidance or minimization of harm and stress to participants; security matters and protection protocols utilized - both for enumerators and people interviewed; protection of privacy and safety of all participants; obtention of informed consent / verbal assent from participants; confidentiality & anonymity of data collected; absence of benefit or compensation offered to interviewees; training of enumerators in these issues and on enumeration/communication skills; declaration of any conflict of interests; if needed: ethical review and registration on clinicaltrial.gov. Reference to UNEG/UNICEF Ethical guidelines for evaluations, Evaluators' code of conduct, and Procedure for ethical standards. URL link to these documents are included Organisation of the evaluation work List of main phases (inception phase, data collection, data analysis and report drafting, stakeholders workshop on preliminary findings and formulation of recommendations, etc.) and timeline Description of each phase: objective and activities undertaken, duration, profile and role of people involved, logistics, support received from Unicef and other stakeholders, challenges faced and measures taken Quality assurance process used for each deliverable (internally within the evaluation team, externally with the evaluation manager, steering committee, technical reference group or during the final stakeholders workshop) and reference to the UNICEF standards for evaluation reports 2.8. Methodological and organizational limitations Methodological limitations: Issues of sampling and sample size; over-reliance on self-report; lack of use of relevant documents or M&E data; identification of potential bias (e.g. from respondents); lack of triangulation of key findings etc Organizational limitations: lack of access to relevant documents, M&E data, key informants; logistical issues, impossibility to make relevant observations in the field; etc How these limitations have been managed and to what extend they weaken the credibility of findings 3. Findings for evaluation criterion #1 - It is suggested here to dedicate one section per evaluation criterion 3.1. Methodological approach Detailed definition of the evaluation criterion and of potential sub-criteria Description of the evaluations questions and sub-questions related to the evaluated criterion, and hypotheses related to this criterion; definition of key concepts Results and analysis Factors explaining the findings (causal analysis) or formulation and assessment of hypotheses Good or bad practice that can be documented, useful for and shared with the various categories of readers (examples, case studies, quotes from the interviews etc.) 3.3. Conclusion on (criterion #1) For each question and programme component: clear, short, objective, evidence-supported and nuanced response Overall assessment of the performance of the programme with reference to the evaluated criterion 4. Findings for evaluation criterion # Methodological approach Detailed definition of the evaluation criterion and of potential sub-criteria Description of the evaluations questions and sub-questions related to the evaluated criterion, and hypotheses related to this criterion; definition of key concepts
4 4.2. Results and analysis Factors explaining the findings (causal analysis) or formulation and assessment of hypotheses Good or bad practice that can be documented, useful for and shared with the various categories of readers (examples, case studies, quotes from the interviews etc.) 4.3. Conclusion on (criterion #2) For each question and programme component: clear, short, objective, evidence-supported and nuanced response Overall assessment of the performance of the programme with reference to the evaluated criterion 5. Findings for evaluation criterion # Methodological approach Detailed definition of the evaluation criterion and of potential sub-criteria Description of the evaluations questions and sub-questions related to the evaluated criterion, and hypotheses related to this criterion; definition of key concepts Results and analysis Factors explaining the findings (causal analysis) or formulation and assessment of hypotheses Good or bad practice that can be documented, useful for and shared with the various categories of readers (examples, case studies, quotes from the interviews etc.) 5.3. Conclusion on (criterion #3) For each question and programme component: clear, short, objective, evidence-supported and nuanced response Overall assessment of the performance of the programme with reference to the evaluated criterion 6. Findings for evaluation criterion # Methodological approach Detailed definition of the evaluation criterion and of potential sub-criteria Description of the evaluations questions and sub-questions related to the evaluated criterion, and hypotheses related to this criterion; definition of key concepts Results and analysis Factors explaining the findings (causal analysis) or formulation and assessment of hypotheses Good or bad practice that can be documented, useful for and shared with the various categories of readers (examples, case studies, quotes from the interviews etc.) 4
5 6.3. Conclusion on (criterion #4) For each question and programme component: clear, short, objective, evidence-supported and nuanced response Overall assessment of the performance of the programme with reference to the evaluated criterion 7. Findings for evaluation criterion # Methodological approach Detailed definition of the evaluation criterion and of potential sub-criteria Description of the evaluations questions and sub-questions related to the evaluated criterion, and hypotheses related to this criterion; definition of key concepts Results and analysis Factors explaining the findings (causal analysis) or formulation and assessment of hypotheses Good or bad practice that can be documented, useful for and shared with the various categories of readers (examples, case studies, quotes from the interviews etc.) 7.3. Conclusion on (criterion #5) For each question and programme component: clear, short, objective, evidence-supported and nuanced response Overall assessment of the performance of the programme with reference to the evaluated criterion 8. Findings for evaluation criterion # Methodological approach Detailed definition of the evaluation criterion and of potential sub-criteria Description of the evaluations questions and sub-questions related to the evaluated criterion, and hypotheses related to this criterion; definition of key concepts For each question and programme component: Presentation of the type of data collected, data source and data collection method used to answer each question (bias mitigation, triangulation) 8.2. Results and analysis Factors explaining the findings (causal analysis) or formulation and assessment of hypotheses Good or bad practice that can be documented, useful for and shared with the various categories of readers (examples, case studies, quotes from the interviews etc.) 8.3. Conclusion on (criterion #6) For each question and programme component: clear, short, objective, evidence-supported and nuanced response Overall assessment of the performance of the programme with reference to the evaluated criterion 9. Conclusions - The report objectively summarizes the key findings by evaluation criterion, programme component, and relevant unit of disaggregation 9.1 Summary of conclusions by evaluation criterion (hightlighing both strengths and weaknesses), and implications for the programme 9.2 Summary of conclusions by programme component (hightlighing both strengths and weaknesses, and specifying which activities or stakeholders contributed the most/least to the results?) and implications for the programme 9.3 Summary of conclusions by sub-category of population, geographical area, etc. and implications for the programme 5
6 10. Recommendations - The report formulates relevant, feasible, users-oriented and prioritized actions logically following the findings and conclusions 10.1 Priority recommendations: Urgent or quick-wins actions (listed by stakeholders/target group, and by programme component) 10.2 More longer term recommendations, likely to be slower to plan and implement (listed by stakeholders/target group, and by programme component) 11. Lessons learnt - Contribution of the evaluation to general knowledge outside of the particular scope of this evaluated programme; good practices worth replicating in other areas, countries or sectors; bad practices to avoid and also to communicate to a wider audience as part of the sector learning 11.1 For the sector stakeholders (programmatic aspects) 11.2 For evaluators of similar programmes (methodological aspects) 11.3 Others 12. Annexes - Provides all data and information needed to better all aspects of the evaluation but that are too long to be included in the body of the report 12.1 Full evaluation matrix linking eval criteria to questions, to hypothesis, to data to be collected, to data source, to data collection methods and sampling (and possibly to criteria or standards that will be used by the evaluation team to make a judgement on whether or not UNICEF as performed well in each particular evaluation question) 12.2 Detailed agenda of the evaluation work 12.3 List of documents read and used 12.4 List of key informants interviewed (if they accept to be identified in the report) 12.5 List of sites visited 12.6 Data collection tools 12.7 Enumerators interview/survey guide (if applicable) 12.8 Full table/set of cleaned data 12.9 Synthesis of comments received on the draft report and how they have been taken into account in the final report (or why not) ToR of the evaluation Short biography / professional background of the evaluators Others 6
GEROS Evaluation Quality Assurance Tool Version
GEROS Evaluation Quality Assurance Tool Version 2016.4 Title of the Evaluation Report Report sequence number Reviewers: complete all cells highlighted in Yellow Support to community sanitation in eastern
More informationUNICEF-Adapted UNEG Quality Checklist for Evaluation Terms of Reference
EVALUATION OFFICE UNICEF-Adapted UNEG Quality Checklist for Evaluation Terms of Reference UNICEF/UNI164247/Johansen Updated June 2017 CONTENTS Introduction... 2 1. Evaluation Object... 3 2. Evaluation
More informationTerms of reference Evaluator for mid-term review of 4.5-year EuropeAid Grant Agreement
Terms of reference Evaluator for mid-term review of 4.5-year EuropeAid Grant Agreement Forus (previously known as International Forum of National NGO Platforms or IFP) is seeking an external evaluator
More informationSection & Overall Rating Highly Satisfactory Satisfactory Fair Unsatisfactory Missing Not Rated Weighting (Score) Implication
Visualisation NOTE to Reviewers: complete the cells formatted in Yellow - - - - - - & Overall Fair Unsatisfactory Missing Not Rated (Score) 4 3 2 0 0 Implication Meets UNICEF/UNEG standards for Exceeds
More informationTechnical Note Integrating Gender in WFP Evaluations
Technical Note Integrating Gender in WFP Evaluations Version September 2017 1. Purpose of this Technical Note 1. This technical note shows how gender equality and empowerment of women (GEEW), hereafter
More informationGuidance: Quality Criteria for Evaluation Reports
Evaluation Guidance Note Series No.8 UNIFEM Evaluation Unit October 2009 Guidance: Quality Criteria for Evaluation Reports 1 1. Introduction The UNIFEM quality criteria for reports are intended to serve
More informationAn independent review of ILO Global Supply Chains interventions undertaken between with a focus on lessons learned, what works and why
ILO EVALUATION OFFICE TERMS OF REFERENCE An independent review of ILO Global Supply Chains interventions undertaken between 2010-2019 with a focus on lessons learned, what works and why An EVAL input to
More informationTerms of Reference (ToR) End-of-the Project Evaluation UNDP Support to the Strategic Capacity Building Initiative
Terms of Reference (ToR) End-of-the Project Evaluation UNDP Support to the Strategic Capacity Building Initiative Introduction In 2011, The Government of Rwanda and the United Nations Development Programme
More informationEvaluation policy PURPOSE
Evaluation policy PURPOSE 1. The purpose of this policy is to define the overall framework for evaluation at WHO, to foster the culture and use of evaluation across the Organization, and to facilitate
More informationTerms of Reference (ToR) End-of-the Programme Evaluation UNDP Support to Inclusive Participation in Governance May 2013
Terms of Reference (ToR) End-of-the Programme Evaluation UNDP Support to Inclusive Participation in Governance May 2013 1. Introduction In April 2007, the United Kingdom, Department for International Development
More informationTerms of Reference. Final Evaluation ALERT Project
Terms of Reference Final Evaluation ALERT Project The ALERT consortium has designed technology for improving the way humanitarian agencies prepare for and respond to disasters. ALERT is a three-year initiative
More informationEvaluation Inception Report Draft Template
Decentralized evaluation for evidence-based decision making WFP Office of Evaluation Evaluation Inception Report Draft Template This template provides a suggested structure and guidance on content for
More informationEvaluation of Environmental and Social Impact Management at ADA Terms of Reference
Evaluation of Environmental and Social Impact Management at ADA Terms of Reference 27 June 2018 1. Background Environmental and Social Impact Management (EGSIM) The Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC)
More informationMid-term Project Evaluation Guidance Note For EIF TIER 1 Funded Projects: Support to National Implementation Arrangements
Mid-term Project Evaluation Guidance Note For EIF TIER 1 Funded Projects: Support to National Implementation Arrangements September 2012 This document is work in progress. Any queries/comments should be
More informationUNICEF Global Evaluation Report Oversight System (GEROS) Review Template
UNICEF Global Evaluation Report Oversight System (GEROS) Review Template Colour Coding CC Dark green Green Amber Red White Questions Outstanding t Applicable Section & Overall Rating Very Confident to
More informationOxfam PNG - WASH Program Final Evaluation
Oxfam PNG - WASH Program Final Evaluation Terms of reference Final Evaluation Program/project title /affiliate identification code Partner organisations Geographical coverage: Program Duration Oxfam PNG
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE. Independent Evaluation of the ILO Action Plan for Gender Equality
TERMS OF REFERENCE Independent Evaluation of the ILO Action Plan for Gender Equality 2010-15 1 Introduction The results-based ILO Action Plan for Gender Equality 2010-15 (the Action Plan) aims to operationalize
More informationHaiti Earthquake 2010 Response and Recovery Programme Final Evaluation
Haiti Earthquake 2010 Response and Recovery Programme Final Evaluation Terms of Reference (TOR) Summary > Purpose: the British Red Cross seeks to evaluate its Haiti Earthquake 2010 Response and Recovery
More informationTerms of Reference for Crisis Management and Recovery Programme Final Evaluation
Purpose of Evaluation The purpose of the Crisis Management and Recovery (CMR) programme final evaluation is to draw lessons both in design and implementation of the project that will aid the Crisis Prevention
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE FINAL EVALUATION 1. BACKGROUND: ONE UN S PARTNERSHIP WITH THE GIHUNDWE HOSPITAL
ONE UN PARTNERSHIP WITH GIHUNDWE HOSPITAL TO PROVIDE HOLISTIC CARE TO SURVIVORS OF VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND GIRLS THROUGH THE ONE STOP CENTER MODEL TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE FINAL EVALUATION Recruitment
More informationWHO reform. WHO evaluation policy
EXECUTIVE BOARD EB130/5 Add.8 130th session 22 December 2011 Provisional agenda item 5 WHO reform WHO evaluation policy BACKGROUND 1. In 2002, WHO developed a framework on Programme Management, focusing
More informationUNICEF Global Evaluation Report Oversight System (GEROS) Review Template
EVALUATION ID 2070-2014/004 UNICEF Global Evaluation Report Oversight System (GEROS) Review Template Colour Coding CC Dark green Green Amber Red White Questions Outstanding Satisfactory No Not Applicable
More informationTerms of Reference. Projects Outputs Evaluation
Terms of Reference Projects Outputs Evaluation Strengthening Participatory and Accountable Governance and Protection of Human Rights. Empowering Civil Society in A. BACKGROUND UNDP s corporate policy is
More informationHow to write a logframe
How to write a logframe Why do we need logframes? Results frameworks and logframes are essential throughout the project cycle, informing decisionmaking at each stage from identifying options, designing
More informationUnited Nations Development Programme South Sudan. Terms of Reference Review of Rapid Capacity Placement Initiative (RCPI) May 2012
United Nations Development Programme South Sudan 1. Background and context Terms of Reference Review of Rapid Capacity Placement Initiative (RCPI) May 2012 The South Sudan Rapid Capacity Placement Initiative
More informationGUIDELINES FOR INCEPTION REPORTS
GUIDELINES FOR INCEPTION REPORTS Please consult the IEU Handbook: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/evaluation/evaluation-handbook.html or contact IEU directly for more guidance. An Inception Report summarizes
More informationSUBPROGRAMME EVALUATION: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POLICIES DIVISION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUBPROGRAMME EVALUATION: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT POLICIES DIVISION Period: January 2014 - December 2017 Nadia BECHRAOUI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is the Final Evaluation Report of the United
More informationMonitoring and Evaluation Policy
Monitoring and Evaluation Policy 1 M&E Policy Last Updated October 2017 1. Introduction The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) policy will apply to the global C&A Foundation including Fundación C&A in Mexico
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
1.0 RIGHT TO PLAY Right To Play is an international humanitarian organization that uses sport and play to promote holistic development of children and youth in the most disadvantaged areas of the world.
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE. The project intervention logicis is described as bellow: 1 P a g e
TERMS OF REFERENCE Project: EMWE Position Title: Evaluator or Consultant team Place of Assignment: Vietnam Ha Noi, Dien Bien and Bac Kan provinces Reporting to: Nguyen Tri Dzung and Le Xuan Hieu Duration:
More informationUNICEF Evaluation Office Terms of Reference: External Assessment of UNICEF s Global Evaluation Reports Oversight System (GEROS)
UNICEF Evaluation Office Terms of Reference: External Assessment of UNICEF s Global Evaluation Reports Oversight System (GEROS) The Evaluation Office is planning to assess the Global Evaluation Reports
More informationGuidelines for UNODC Evaluation Terms of Reference
Guidelines for UNODC Evaluation Terms of Reference These Guidelines are to be used along with the Template for Evaluation Terms of Reference 1 (ToR) when developing the draft ToR. The ToR are a written
More informationTHE DEPARTMENT OF NUTRITION FOR HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION APRIL 2015
TERMS OF REFERENCE EVALUATION OF DFATD PROJECT ACCELERATING NUTRITION IMPROVEMENTS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA (ANI) COMMISSIONED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF NUTRITION FOR HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION
More informationPROCEDURE AND TOOLS FOR EVALUABILITY REVIEW OF ILO PROJECTS OVER US$5 MILLION
PROCEDURE AND TOOLS FOR EVALUABILITY REVIEW OF ILO PROJECTS OVER US$5 MILLION August 2014 (containing forms to fill in at end of document) BACKGROUND Over two-thirds of independent evaluations flag poor
More informationEvaluation purpose and scope The overall purpose of the evaluation, as laid out in the ToR, is to:
Annex A: Methodology This annex outlines the evaluation s applied methodology. Evaluation purpose and scope The overall purpose of the evaluation, as laid out in the ToR, is to: Document achievements and
More informationUNICEF/EAPRO, Bangkok
UNICEF/EAPRO, Bangkok TERMS OF REFERENCE - LONG TERM ARRANGEMENT ********************************************************************************** 1. Background As a joint contribution towards the achievement
More informationTerms of Reference (ToR)
Terms of Reference (ToR) Mid -Term Evaluations of the Two Programmes: UNDP Support to Deepening Democracy and Accountable Governance in Rwanda (DDAG) and Promoting Access to Justice, Human Rights and Peace
More informationUNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME TERMS OF REFERENCE
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME TERMS OF REFERENCE 1. Consultancy Information Consultancy title: Outcome Evaluations for UNDP South Sudan Country Programme Outcomes 1: Core governance and civil service
More informationProvision of Support Services: Office space: Yes x No Equipment (laptop etc): Yes x No Secretarial Services Yes x No. Signature of the Budget Owner:.
I. Position Information Title: International Evaluator Final Evaluation of the Advancing Climate Change Agenda in Kosovo (SLED II) Project Department/Unit: Environment, Climate and Disaster Resilience
More informationMid-term Evaluation for the Gender and Generational Empowerment project in Tanzania.
Mid-term Evaluation for the Gender and Generational Empowerment project in Tanzania. Twin is a non-profit organization which owns a trading company. This structure allows us to combine trade, marketing,
More informationTerms of Reference Independent Final Evaluation of Zambia Green Jobs Programme March 2018
1. Introduction & rationale for evaluation Terms of Reference Independent Final Evaluation of Zambia Green Jobs Programme March 2018 The Green Jobs Programme of the Government of Zambia implemented with
More informationTIPS PREPARING AN EVALUATION STATEMENT OF WORK ABOUT TIPS
NUMBER 3 2 ND EDITION, 2010 PERFORMANCE MONITORING & EVALUATION TIPS PREPARING AN EVALUATION STATEMENT OF WORK ABOUT TIPS These TIPS provide practical advice and suggestions to USAID managers on issues
More informationEnd-Phase Project Evaluation Guidance Note. For EIF Tier I and Tier II-funded projects
End-Phase Project Evaluation Guidance Note For EIF Tier I and Tier II-funded projects July 2015 1 GUIDANCE NOTE FOR THE END PHASE EVALUATION OF AN EIF PROJECT INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT The EIF is centred
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE FOR ENDLINE EVALUATION OF FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY PROJECT IN BORNO STATE, NIGERIA
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR ENDLINE EVALUATION OF FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY PROJECT IN BORNO STATE, NIGERIA Organizations Project Name Sector Position Short Assignment Position Location Reporting to Duration
More informationTerms of Reference (ToR)
Terms of Reference (ToR) Final Evaluation Project/Programme Title: Country: Coffee Alliances for Ethiopia (CAFÈ) Ethiopia Project/Programme Number: 2550-14/2014 Name of Partner Organisation: Austrian Development
More informationTerms of Reference: Project Final Evaluation
Terms of Reference: Project Final Evaluation 1. Background Project: Implementing agency and partner(s): Project funding sources: Creating a space for the participation of Myanmar s civil society in policy
More informationSEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND MOROCCO is seeking Midterm Evaluator [Consultant] Region Tangier - Tetouan, Morocco
SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND MOROCCO is seeking Midterm Evaluator [Consultant] Region Tangier - Tetouan, Morocco THE POSITION Title: Midterm Evaluator [Consultant] Duration: 2 months Location: Region Tangier
More informationEvaluation Policy for GEF Funded Projects
Evaluation Policy for GEF Funded Projects Context Conservation International helps society adopt the conservation of nature as the foundation of development. We do this to measurably improve and sustain
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE FINAL EVALUATION OF HAKI MKONONI RIGHTS IN OUR HANDS
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE FINAL EVALUATION OF HAKI MKONONI RIGHTS IN OUR HANDS January 2017 Programme/project title /affiliate identification code Haki Mkononi Rights in our hands / R05168 PAFA35 Geographical
More informationINDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE / TERMS OF REFERENCE Description of the assignment: Final Evaluation National Consultant
INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE / TERMS OF REFERENCE Description of the assignment: Final Evaluation National Consultant Project title: UNDP/GEP II Period of assignment/services (if applicable):
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE FOR REVIEW OF CPAP OUTCOME KEN 44
Kenya TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR REVIEW OF CPAP OUTCOME KEN 44 POLICIES AND PROGRAMMES FOR PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND EMPLOYMENT CREATION DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED BY 2013 Outline of the ToR 1.0: Background
More informationEVALUATION STATEMENT OF WORK CHECKLIST AND REVIEW TEMPLATE
EVALUATION STATEMENT OF WORK CHECKLIST AND REVIEW TEMPLATE The Evaluation Statement of Work (SOW) Checklist and Review Template are tools to assist in developing and reviewing USAID Evaluation SOWs. The
More informationUNICEF Evaluation Office Evaluation of UNICEF s Policy Advocacy Work: Mapping and Scoping Exercise
UNICEF Evaluation Office Evaluation of UNICEF s Policy Advocacy Work: Mapping and Scoping Exercise The Evaluation Office is planning to evaluate UNICEF s policy advocacy work in Middle Income Countries
More informationAmerican Red Cross Haiti Delegation 22, rue Metellus Petion Ville Port au Prince, Haiti
American Red Cross Haiti Delegation 22, rue Metellus Petion Ville Port au Prince, Haiti -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationEvaluation Terms of Reference Template
Decentralized evaluation for evidence-based decision making WFP Office of Evaluation Decentralized Evaluation Quality Assurance System (DEQAS) Evaluation Terms of Reference Template Version November 2015
More informationTerms of Reference EXTERNAL EVALUATION ( ) OF FOKUS PROGRAMME WOMEN S ECONOMIC PARTICIPATION AND RIGHTS IN UGANDA
Terms of Reference EXTERNAL EVALUATION (2015-2017) OF FOKUS PROGRAMME WOMEN S ECONOMIC PARTICIPATION AND RIGHTS IN UGANDA General objective Location Audience Timeframe Expected outputs To evaluate the
More informationTerms of Reference. Senior Researcher / Study Consultant for the Educational Demand and Needs Assessment Study
REPÚBLICA DEMOCRÁTICA DE TIMOR-LESTE MINISTÉRIO DA EDUCAÇÃO Direção Nacional do Ensino Recorrente Rua Vila Verde Dili,Telf. 77304158 / 77012038 / 77012042 Terms of Reference Senior Researcher / for the
More informationExecuting Organisations: SOCADIDO - Soroti Catholic Diocese Integrated Development Organisation Hoffnungszeichen Sign of Hope e.v.
Terms of Reference for a Feasibility Study Project Title: CONSERVING AND RESTORING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS AND NATURAL RE- SOURCES IN THE TESO REGION, EASTERN UGANDA, THROUGH COMMUNITY ACTION SUP- PORT Country:
More informationTerms of Reference for Final Evaluation of Oxfam s Syria Crisis Response programme in Syria
Terms of Reference for Final Evaluation of Oxfam s Syria Crisis Response programme in Syria Programme title: Oxfam s Syria Crisis Response in Syria Sector of intervention: Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE. Location
TERMS OF REFERENCE Location Home-based with one travel to Bangkok, Thailand Application deadline 10 February 2017 Type of Contract Individual Contractor Senior Evaluation Expert (International) Post Level
More informationGLOBAL EVALUATION REPORT OVERSIGHT SYSTEM
GLOBAL EVALUATION REPORT OVERSIGHT SYSTEM Summary UNICEF Staff Handbook Evaluation Office GEROS Handbook (Summary Version) Version 3.2 Cover photo UNICEF/UN013173 This Handbook aims to orient UNICEF staff
More informationINDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE National Consultant To support UNDAF Evaluation for Nepal
INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT PROCUREMENT NOTICE National Consultant To support UNDAF Evaluation for Nepal Date: 31 May 2016 Reference No.: UNDP/PN/23/2016 Country: Nepal Description of the assignment: The national
More informationSee Annex 2 for the terms of reference and Annex 3 regarding progress in the development of high-level indicators
Agenda Item 2 For Endorsement Document: SMB3-02 A proposed approach for leading a consultative process for the development of an Integrated Framework for a Performance Management System for CGIAR Research
More informationUNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME JOB DESCRIPTION
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME JOB DESCRIPTION I. Position Information Contract: Individual Consultant to Design a Monitoring & Evaluation System for the LED Framework and Action Plan for Botswana
More informationTraining on Project Cycle Management for Researchers Ethiopian Academy of Sciences May 2016, Ghion Hotel, Addis Ababa
Training on Project Cycle Management for Researchers Ethiopian Academy of Sciences 25-27 May 2016, Ghion Hotel, Addis Ababa To increase participants understanding of the concepts used in designing M&E
More informationTerms of Reference (TOR)
CONFÉRENCE DES NATIONS UNIES SUR LE COMMERCE ET LE DÉVELOPPEMENT UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Terms of Reference (TOR) External Evaluation of Development Account Project 1213 I Strengthening
More informationTerms of Reference Final Evaluation
Terms of Reference Final Evaluation Expanding the Table: Empowering Women to Identify Protection Strategies In Sierra Leone s Industrializing Districts Sierra Leone: Bombali, Port Loko and Pujehun Districts
More informationTerms of Reference (TOR)
Annex 4 Terms of Reference (TOR) Conducting Simplified Economic Appraisals for proposed labour intensive public infrastructure projects contributing to local economic development. 1. Project title: Simplified
More informationPROJECT PREPARATION GRANT (PPG) PROJECT TYPE: Full-sized Project TYPE OF TRUST FUND: GEF Trust Fund
PROJECT PREPARATION GRANT (PPG) PROJECT TYPE: Full-sized Project TYPE OF TRUST FUND: GEF Trust Fund Submission date: 07/09/2012 Resubmission date: 11/15/2012 Resubmission date: 01/18/2013 GEF PROJECT ID:
More informationTerms of Reference Final Evaluation Open for business : Promoting equitable land rights protection in Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea
Terms of Reference Final Evaluation Open for business : Promoting equitable land rights protection in Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea Search for Common Ground 1. Background 1.1. Organization Overview
More informationC-18: Checklist for Assessing USAID Evaluation Reports
C-18: Checklist for Assessing USAID Evaluation Reports Checklist for Reviewing Evaluation Reports High quality, evidence-based evaluation reports with a clear focus on decision-making for USAID and other
More information(FY ) TERMS OF REFERENCE DRAFT [DATE]
WWF Deutschland Evaluation of the project Increasing the resilience of forest ecosystems against climate change in the South Caucasus countries through forest transformation (FY 2009-2014) TERMS OF REFERENCE
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE. 1. Background on the project
TERMS OF REFERENCE DEVELOPMENT OF A MONITORING & EVALUATION FRAMEWORK AND BASELINE STUDY FOR THE PROJECT PROMOTING BROADER AND EFFECTIVE PARTICIPATION OF SOUTH AFRICAN CIVIL SOCIETY IN ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE
More informationMONITORING AND EVALUATIONS MANUAL PIDF SECRETARIAT
Page 1 of 15 MONITORING AND EVALUATIONS MANUAL PIDF SECRETARIAT LAST UPDATE: 10 TH JUNE 2016 PREPARED BY: VILIAME KASANAWAQA- TL POLICY RESEARCH AND EVALUATIONS CHECKED BY: PENIJAMINI LOMALOMA- DEPUTY
More informationTerms of Reference for a Gender Analysis
Terms of Reference for a Gender Analysis 1. BACKGROUND The European Commission defines a gender analysis as the study of differences in the conditions, needs, participation rates, access to resources and
More informationCI-GEF PROJECT AGENCY MONITORING AND EVALUATION POLICY FOR GEF-FUNDED PROJECTS
CI-GEF PROJECT AGENCY MONITORING AND EVALUATION POLICY FOR GEF-FUNDED PROJECTS Version 02 March 2016 1 DOCUMENT LOG AND CHANGE RECORD Version Date Changes/Comments Author(s) 01 Oct 2013 Version submitted
More informationUNICEF Lao PDR TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR SERVICES CONTRACT
UNICEF Lao PDR TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR SERVICES CONTRACT Title: International Individual Consultancy for WASH District-Level Bottleneck Analysis Requesting Section: WASH Start and end dates: January to
More informationExecutive Board of the United Nations Development Programme and of the United Nations Population Fund
United Nations DP/2011/3 Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme and of the United Nations Population Fund Distr.: General 15 November 2010 Original: English First regular session 2011
More informationUNICEF Global Evaluation Report Oversight System (GEROS) Review Template
UNICEF Global Evaluation Report Oversight System (GEROS) Review Template Colour Coding CC Dark green Green Amber Red White Questions Outstanding t Applicable Section & Overall Rating Outstanding/ Good/
More informationIAS EVALUATION POLICY
IAS EVALUATION POLICY May 2011 Table of contents Background...3 Purpose of the evaluation policy...3 Evaluation definition...3 Evaluation objectives...4 Evaluation scope...4 Guiding principles for the
More informationUNDAF MID-TERM REVIEW. TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANT (Team Leader)
Introduction: UNDAF MID-TERM REVIEW TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANT (Team Leader) The United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF 2014-2018) is the fourth generation Programme
More informationUNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND (UNICEF) CALL FOR INSTITUTIONAL EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST
UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND (UNICEF) CALL FOR INSTITUTIONAL EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (EOIs) OUTCOME EVALUATION OF THE CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP FUND PHASE II Issuance of the EOI: 2 December 2016
More informationConsultancy Vacancy UNHCR Evaluation Service
Consultancy Vacancy UNHCR Evaluation Service Organisation: Title: Location: Duration: Contract Type: UNHCR Evaluation Surge Consultants Internationally mobile January 2018 December 2018 (with possibility
More informationCall for Expression of Interest
Call for Expression of Interest Mid term Evaluation Project: Empowerment of Vulnerable Women in Sri Lanka Deadline for submission of Expression of Interest: October 17 th 2014 1. Introduction Empowerment
More informationCountry Portfolio Evaluations I. GUIDANCE FOR PROCESS & CONTENT
measuring results, sharing lessons WFP Office of Evaluation CENTRALIZED EVALUATION QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM (CEQAS) Country Portfolio Evaluations I. GUIDANCE FOR PROCESS & CONTENT Last updated: October
More informationMonitoring and Evaluation Training Modules Table of Contents
1 ASSESSMENT, MONITORING AND EVALUATION: DEFINITION AND PURPOSE 1.1 MONITORING AND EVALUATION: WHAT, WHY, WHEN 1.1.1 DEMISTIFYING M&E: M&E IN DAILY LIFE FN M&E in daily life CCS - 1.1.2 ASSESSMENT, MONITORING
More informationCARE International Evaluation Policy 1
CARE International Evaluation Policy 1 Purpose This Evaluation Policy is being articulated to help CARE achieve its vision and mission of poverty reduction and rights fulfilment, through the promotion
More informationTerms of Reference (TOR) Evaluation of UN Volunteers intervention ( ) in the Tonle Sap Conservation Project
Terms of Reference (TOR) Evaluation of UN Volunteers intervention (2007-2009) in the Tonle Sap Conservation Project 1.1. Background to the UNV Programme The United Nations Volunteer (UNV) programme is
More informationCONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR EVALUATION OF THE ECOWAS PROGRAMME ON GENDER MAINSTREAMING IN ENERGY ACCESS (ECOW-GEN) IN ECOWAS COUNTRIES
1 P a g e REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) AND TERMS OF REFERENCE CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR EVALUATION OF THE ECOWAS PROGRAMME ON GENDER MAINSTREAMING IN ENERGY ACCESS (ECOW-GEN) IN ECOWAS COUNTRIES Expertise:
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE SOUTH AFRICA FINANCIAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM PROGRAM INDEPENDENT PROGRAM EVALUATION. I. Background
TERMS OF REFERENCE SOUTH AFRICA FINANCIAL SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM PROGRAM INDEPENDENT PROGRAM EVALUATION I. Background 1. The South African financial system contains a highly developed and well-capitalized
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) Title: Voices from the Underground: End-of-Project Evaluation Mozambique and South Africa
TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) Title: Voices from the Underground: End-of-Project Evaluation 201-2016 Period: May June 2017 Duration: Sites: Duty Station: 20 days Mozambique and South Africa IOM Maputo Background
More informationFrequently Asked Questions: UN-SWAP Evaluation Performance Indicator Reporting
Reference Document Frequently Asked Questions: UN-SWAP Evaluation Performance Indicator Reporting November 2016 UNEG SO3 Working Group on Gender Equality & Human Rights Introduction This FAQ was developed
More informationTerms of Reference Mid-term Review (MTR) of Girls Advocacy Alliance (GAA) Project in Nepal
Terms of Reference Mid-term Review (MTR) of Girls Advocacy Alliance (GAA) Project in Nepal 1 Background Plan International is an independent development and humanitarian organization that advances children
More informationTERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) CONSULTANCY SERVICE CALL FOR BASELINE SURVEY
TERMS OF REFERENCE (TOR) CONSULTANCY SERVICE CALL FOR BASELINE SURVEY of the Inclusive and Sustainable Clam and Bamboo Value Chain Development in Vietnam project (SCBV) 1. BACKGROUND Clam and bamboo production
More informationUNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND (UNICEF) CALL FOR INSTITUTIONAL EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (EOI)
UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND (UNICEF) CALL FOR INSTITUTIONAL EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST (EOI) Reducing Stunting in Children under Five Years of Age: A Comprehensive Evaluation of UNICEF s Strategies and
More informationWorld Vision s Approach to Local Ownership in Evaluation. Korça, Albania Development Program a case study
World Vision s Approach to Local Ownership in Evaluation Korça, Albania Development Program a case study Prepared by: Holta Trandafili and Albana Dino, World Vision US March 2015 Summary Intro to the Development
More informationUNLIREC TERMS OF REFERENCE
TERMS OF REFERENCE -DCAF joint project Strengthening Oversight and Building Capacities for Small Arms Control in the Private Security Sector External Evaluation I. GENERAL INFORMATION Unit: Title: Duty
More informationTerms of Reference (TOR)
CONFÉRENCE DES NATIONS UNIES SUR LE COMMERCE ET LE DÉVELOPPEMENT UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Terms of Reference (TOR) External Evaluation of Development Account Project 1415 AX Support
More informationMaking the choice: Decentralized Evaluation or Review? (Orientation note) Draft for comments
Introduction Making the choice: Decentralized Evaluation or Review? (Orientation note) Draft for comments 1. WFP stands in the frontline of the global fight against hunger. Its operational decisions which
More informationTerms of Reference Final Evaluation I love my country : Strategic Communications for Peace building in South Sudan
Terms of Reference Final Evaluation I love my country : Strategic Communications for Peace building in South Sudan 1. Context About Search for Common Ground SFCG is an international NGO working in 35 countries
More information