Comments from ACCA January 2009
|
|
- Anna Porter
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AUDIT FIRM GOVERNANCE Evidence Gathering Consultation Paper issued by the Audit Firm Governance Working Group in a project for the Financial Reporting Council Comments from ACCA January 2009
2 ACCA (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) is the largest and fastest-growing global professional accountancy body with over 122,000 members and 325,000 students in 170 countries. We aim to offer the first choice qualifications to people of application, ability and ambition around the world who seek a rewarding career in accountancy, finance and management. ACCA works to achieve and promote the highest professional, ethical and governance standards and advance the public interest.
3 Page 1 Executive Summary ACCA welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Evidence Gathering Consultation Paper (the Paper), issued by the Audit Firm Governance Working Group in a project for the Financial Reporting Council. We congratulate the Working Group on the accuracy and appropriate depth of the analysis in the Paper supported by the inclusion of relevant supplementary briefing information. ACCA supports the concept of a Combined Code-style, comply or explain approach to audit firm governance. However, there are considerable differences between the application of the Combined Code to listed companies and the circumstances of an Audit Firm Governance Code (the Code) that argue for a more flexible approach. There is considerable diversity within the relatively small number of audit firms to which the Code would apply. As well as size, there are differences in ownership and governance structures and in the international structures of networks. This lessens the likelihood of achieving a consensus approach to the Code. Audit firms are already heavily regulated and it is important for the Code to avoid duplicating requirements. In addition, we do not believe that a rigid Code could avoid imposing a disproportionate cost on smaller audit firms. There is a fundamental choice to be made between creating the Code to reflect a natural balance between the needs of a firm s stakeholders or to treat the shareholders of audit client companies as its primary focus. ACCA favours the latter as it aligns the project more closely to the rationale behind the FRC Choice in the UK Audit Market project. Other stakeholders may be able to make use of the outcome of the application of the Code, in particular, the owners of the business, normally the partners in the firm.
4 Page 2 We suggest that the Code, which should be enforced only by market forces, should be reported at the level of the UK firm, including its non-audit activities and have regard to any significant risks in network structures. The application of the various mechanisms of governance may however be at a different, higher level if the corporate structure of the firm makes that a more practicable approach. ACCA is pleased to offer further support to the Audit Firm Governance Working Group in particular to assist the Working Group by sharing insights from our global interactions with auditors, investors and regulators in major capital markets.
5 Page 3 General Comments THE IMPORTANCE OF GOOD GOVERNANCE In the current challenging economic conditions there is an even greater need on the part of shareholders and, indeed, society as a whole to be able to have confidence in corporate reporting. A reliable audit, carried out by a properly competent firm should be a key component contributing to this confidence. It is important that audit firms are, and are seen to be, well governed. We recognise, therefore, the importance of this project and we support its objectives. We support the Combined Code and the comply or explain approach for listed companies. However, as we have suggested in the past to the FRC, we consider the application of the Combined Code s principles to be at least as important as its provisions and so prefer what we refer to as an apply, comply or explain approach. The current crisis affecting the banking sector has raised difficult questions about how well some organisations have applied the Combined Code s principles. In particular, there have been concerns about how shareholders engage with boards and boards engage with management. It would seem that such engagement to date has not been entirely in the long-tem interest of companies or their shareholders and other stakeholders and may even have encouraged the short-termist behaviour which has jeopardised the financial system.
6 Page 4 SUPPORT FOR THE CONCEPT CAUTION ABOUT THE PRACTICALITIES The Paper correctly anticipates that the creation of the Code would need to overcome considerable difficulties in relation to matters such as: risk management, the international structures of the firms, governance structures and independent non-executives, and scope of firms to be covered. We agree with this and in our answers to the specific questions posed in the Paper we note many difficulties under these and other headings. If the Code is introduced with the scope laid down by the Market Participants Group (MPG), we conclude that it will be too costly for smaller audit firms, particularly if it mandates independent non-executive directors. There does not exist currently a consensus as to what constitutes best practice in governance of audit firms. For example, positions on the value of independent non-executive directors are either unresolved or in complete opposition to one another. While some firms advise on and profess exceptional expertise in corporate governance of listed companies, their internal governance arrangements have yet to receive a similar level of public exposure and scrutiny. The long history that stands behind the current Combined Code 1 is absent. The MPG recognised that it could only recommend the application of a Combined Code-style best practice corporate governance guide because the Combined Code would require considerable modification to be fit for use in the different circumstances of audit firms. The MPG also concluded that its recommendation should be less costly than increased regulation. We regret that the Code has not been more properly referred to as the Guide as that would not only accord with the MPG terminology but also signal the necessarily different nature of the corporate governance pronouncement for audit firms. 1 The Cadbury Committee code of best practice for companies was issued in The Combined Code describes itself as being distilled from consultation and widespread experience over many years.
7 Page 5 The Combined Code is clear in its focus on shareholders, coinciding with the primary addressees of financial reporting. There are issues about the extent to which the Code should now recognise other legitimate stakeholders but that is outside the scope of this response. As set out in our answer to question 1, in drawing up the Code the Working Group faces a fundamental choice as to whether the Code is intended to be responsive to a natural range of stakeholders (as firms existing governance arrangements are), or whether it is to be focussed on the needs of the shareholders of public interest entities audited by a firm. If the latter, which we favour for pragmatic reasons, the Code has to be created with no history and no best practice, because no firm to our knowledge has an existing governance approach giving primacy to such remote stakeholders. We have no doubt that such a Code can be created, but it is a reason for cautioning against anything other than a voluntary Code with appropriate flexibility.
8 Page 6 Matters on which Specific Comments are Requested In this section of our response we answer the specific questions posed in the Paper. STAKEHOLDERS OF FIRMS THAT AUDIT PUBLIC INTEREST ENTITIES Question 1 Which groups of stakeholders do you think the Audit Firm Governance Code should primarily serve and in what ways, if any, do they have differing interests? The answer to this question depends directly on whether the Code is intended to be responsive to a natural range of stakeholders, or whether it is to be focussed on the needs of the principal stakeholders of public interest entities audited by a firm 2 ; a firm s partners are the principal natural stakeholders, otherwise, the shareholders of audit client companies are the principal stakeholders 3. For pragmatic reasons we suggest that, at this stage of the development of audit firm governance, the Code should be orientated to the shareholders of audit client companies as they are the focus of the Combined Code. This simplifies the Code by avoiding the need to achieve a balanced response to a range of stakeholders. Other stakeholders may benefit from the Code and we include in this context the owners of the firm and directors of public interest entities including their audit committees. 2 We discuss this further in our General Comments earlier in this response. 3 For ease, in this response we generally use the term stakeholders to refer also to stakeholder groups, (ie. groups of individual stakeholders).
9 Page 7 RISK MANAGEMENT Question 2 What approach should a Combined Code-style Audit Firm Governance Code adopt to risk management and internal control? We agree with the analysis in the Paper that effective risk management and internal control are critical to the success and sustainability of an audit firm; accordingly, the Code should address this together with appropriate disclosure. As the Paper points out, audit firms are heavily regulated and stakeholders have access not only to financial statements but also to a range of information that concentrates on audit quality. Of particular current interest is reporting by the Audit Inspection Unit on certain firms. For example, in the public report on the 2007/8 inspection of KPMG LLP and KPMG Audit PLC (issued 8 December 2008) the findings begin: KPMG has demonstrated its commitment to audit quality in the implementation of its business strategy, the continued enhancement of procedures and controls and the tone and content of external and internal communications. We expand on this answer in our response to questions 4 and 5. As a by-product of the Audit Firm Governance project, we suggest that the Working Party could make suggestions as to how firms can present information to stakeholders so that a complete picture is apparent. Indeed, in drawing up the Code, it would not be efficient to specify the provision of any information to stakeholders that is already available in another form.
10 Page 8 Question 3 To what extent do the firms face unique issues in discussing their principal litigation and claims risks without causing damage to the sustainability of the firm? Litigation and claims risks are both fundamental to a firm s continuing existence and of particular relevance to the auditing profession, which may face claims of disproportionate magnitude, as litigants to seek to recover losses in relation to the audited company rather than the cost of the audit. We are sympathetic to the argument in the Paper that requiring disclosures could result in adverse consequences for a firm and might even impact its sustainability. Given the strong link between the current Project and the objective of certain of the recommendations of the MPG, to reduce the risk of an audit firm leaving the market without good reason, it would be a terrible irony if application of the Code were to precipitate such an event. The need for commercial confidentiality should be recognised. Question 4 Do you agree that the Audit Firm Governance Code should focus on risk management and internal control of the firm as a whole including its nonaudit business and, if not, what alternatives would you propose? In our answer to question 1 we drew a distinction between whether the Code is intended to be responsive to a natural range of stakeholders, or whether it is to be focussed on the needs of the principal stakeholders of public interest entities audited by a firm. If the former, it would be necessary to consider matters for the firm as a whole. If the latter, it would be possible to report in relation only to the audit practice, but we do not think that is an appropriate entity to which to restrict governance measures. The firm as a whole would also be synonymous with the UK entity presenting financial statements and a transparency report. There are additional complexities in that it may not be practicable to implement corporate governance arrangements for the UK firm alone as organisational structures may be on a wider basis. We address these in our answer to question 5 below.
11 Page 9 As set out in our answer to question 6, although not directly under the control of the firm, it is vital that risk assessment extends to the possible impact of risks in network structures. INTERNATIONAL STRUCTURES OF THE FIRMS Question 5 In the case of a UK firm that is part of a regional or an international structure, should the Audit Firm Governance Code specify the level at which it is applicable or should the firm be given some discretion to determine the level at which it applies the Code, explaining why this level has been chosen? Ideally, governance should take place and be reported in relation to the UK firm: a scope equivalent to that of other relevant information (principally the financial statements and the transparency report). Where, because of an international structure, that is not the most effective approach, firms should be free to apply the code at a higher level. This should not be a requirement because of the extra-territorial implications. Reporting (including stakeholder engagement) should nevertheless be in relation to the UK firm. Question 6 Do you think that the Audit Firm Governance Code should contain code principles and/or code provisions covering an audit firm s dependence on, and exposure to the risks of, other network members and how it ensures consistent quality and application of auditing standards? It is vital that the Code recognises that, although not directly under the control of the firm, risk assessment properly extends to the potential impact of risks in network structures. Such risks are a particular feature of the auditing profession and are of interest to stakeholders. The Code should acknowledge that a basic description of network arrangements is required in transparency reports.
12 Page 10 The matter of consistent quality and application of auditing standards by other network members is best considered as part of the more-specific audit quality reporting as it is within the scope of AIU reports 4. GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES AND INDEPENDENT NON-EXECUTIVES Question 7 In principle, do you think that the Audit Firm Governance Code should support the appointment of independent non-executives by the firms and, if so, what might it say on the number or proportion of non-executives and their position, role and responsibilities in a firm s governance structure? At least one firm has already appointed independent non-executive directors whereas another is on record as strongly defending its use of a supervisory board that only includes partners in the firm 5. We do not believe that firms could achieve a consensus on best practice regarding appointment or the role of non-executive directors; nor do we believe that the time is right for the Code to introduce any expectation that independent non-executives will be appointed. ACCA supports the principle of having non-executive directors on the unitary boards of listed companies but we have strong reservations about the need for them in an oversight function where a supervisory board is providing oversight and the members of that board are seasoned professionals used to exercising independence of thought. Clearly, non-executive directors may bring other insights to the board and the Code should not stand in the way of their appointment. 4 For example the AIU report on KPMG referred to in our answer to question 3 contains the following: We also considered that the co-ordination of the group audits of multi-location companies reviewed by us was a particular strength. We commented positively on the procedures that had been established to ensure that an appropriate and consistent level of audit quality was achieved across the group. 5 PricewaterhouseCoopers as quoted on page 51 of the final report of the MPG.
13 Page 11 It will be of interest in the planned review of the Combined Code to see what evidence can be put forward concerning the value of non-executive directors as the current problems facing UK banks have highlighted once again that nonexecutive directors cannot or will not necessarily protect organisations from risk or ensure that a strategy is sound. Question 8 Other than matters related to auditor independence, are there any barriers, regulatory or otherwise, to the appointment of independent non-executives to firms? If the Code were to apply to all firms that audit public interest entities and require the appointment of NEDs there would be a disproportionate cost burden on smaller firms. A similar position has been recognise in the Combined Code, which is applied differently by companies below the FTSE 350. In view of our response to question 7 above we do not elaborate further on the practical difficulties that could arise in relation to the appointment of NEDs. Question 9 What other governance structures and models are there that provide for independent oversight which might be considered by the Audit Firm Governance Working Group? The Policy Governance Model articulated by John Carver might be worth considering 6. It clearly distinguishes management from governance and offers a useful focus for the governing body of an organisation as well as a system for delegation by that body to management. 6 See
14 Page 12 SCOPE OF FIRMS TO BE COVERED Question 10 In order to determine which firms the Audit Firm Governance Code applies to, should the definition of a public interest entity be based upon the narrower listed company market definition used for transparency reporting purposes or the wider definition used by the AIU or some other definition? The question takes as its starting point the wording of recommendation 14 of the MPG s final report in which the scope of application is every firm that audits public interest entities. As clearly set out in the Paper, such firms differ considerable in size and in the number of their public interest audit clients. We do not expect that it will be possible for the Code to be created in such a way that it can be applied by all such firms without there being disproportionate costs for smaller firms. A purely voluntary approach is we suggest likely to serve the needs of the market better, while existing requirements relating to audit quality remain appropriate to promote that for all auditors of public interest entities. Even with the apparent flexibility allowed by the explain element of disclosure of non-compliance, we question the need to introduce the Code as a requirement for every firm that audits public interest entities. The genesis of recommendation 14 is the Choice in the UK Audit Market project and realistically the market will not be greatly interested in the governance of audit firms other than those actively seeking to maintain or increase their penetration of the listed company audit market. If the Working Group decides to retain the proposed wide application of the Code, we favour the definition of public interest entity adopted for transparency reports.
15 Page 13 Question 11 Do you think that a distinction should be made between firms that would be required to apply the Audit Firm Governance Code and firms that would be encouraged to apply it on a voluntary basis and, if so, where should that distinction be drawn? We would prefer a voluntary basis for all firms. IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING Question 12 Based on the assumption that the comply or explain approach will apply, to what extent do you think that the implementation of the Audit Firm Governance Code should be left to the market because owners of the firms and shareholders and directors of listed companies can be relied on to ensure that the firms apply the Code and make appropriate explanations of noncompliance? It is a matter fro detailed research to determine the extent to which the firms contemplated to be within the scope of the Code have already put in place and disclosed governance arrangements. That will provide an indication of the strength of the market forces that would act as the future enforcement mechanism for the Code. The existence of the Code and attendant changes in the business environment may be expected to increase the focus of the market on audit firm governance. Market forces may need further cultivation 7 or indeed a specific requirement may be needed for the comply or explain disclosures that would drive application of the Code. Such a requirement would be consistent with that in the Listing Rules. 7 An idea to increase market would be to facilitate the creation of an investor-led audit firm governance forum, which would interest itself in the Code and the monitoring of its effectiveness.
16 Page 14 Question 13 What need, if any, do you think there will be for: Audit regulations to require the firms to make comply or explain disclosures in relation to the Audit Firm Governance Code? A regulatory or other body to monitor and to check either compliance with the Audit Firm Governance Code or the appropriateness of explanations of non-compliance? Involvement of auditors appointed by the firms? If a successful market solution can be found, there should be no need for any of these regulatory measures. If disclosures are made in annual reports, firms would be able to invite their auditors to report on certain objectively verifiable elements of the disclosures. Question 14 Can you suggest any potential deregulatory measures to eliminate possible duplication that could be linked to the implementation of the Audit Firm Governance Code? It is important that the interface between the Code and other regulatory requirements is well considered so that duplication is avoided, but we see no justification in removing existing regulation to facilitate what would be expansion of the areas addressed by the Code.
17 Page 15 REPORTING AND COMMUNICATION Question 15 What measures should be taken in relation to how and where the firms disseminate information about their application of the Audit Firm Governance Code so as to enhance its usefulness? We agree with the view in the Paper that... disclosures that will result from the introduction of the Audit Firm Governance Code will... enter a crowded reporting landscape. In general, when using market forces as the primary enforcement mechanism, we expect reporting in relation to the Code to take place through website dissemination, which should be sufficient. We favour the introduction of an approach paralleling that for UK companies listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange, for which the Listing Rules require their corporate governance to be described in the annual report and accounts. The annual report could signpost users to other forms of disclosure relevant to audit quality, although in practice, that may be achieved by the way in which information is presented on the firm s website. Question 16 Should the Audit Firm Governance Code call for disclosure of specific matters, such as major changes in governance practices, responses to specific concerns raised by the AIU, and any other matters? We do not favour the creation of a list of specific disclosures. A principles-based disclosure culture should ensure that significant matters (which would include major changes in governance practices) are addressed.
18 Page 16 AREAS TO BE COVERED BY THE CODE Question 17 Are there principles and provisions in the Combined Code which you think are particularly relevant or inappropriate for application to the firms and are there major issues of relevance to the firms that are not included in the Combined Code? We append ACCA s policy paper Corporate Governance and Risk Management Agenda. It presents ten principles which we believe better take stakeholders into account and would be appropriate for audit firms. We invite the Working Group to use these principles. In relation to the Combined Code, the main principles in sections A to D of the Combined Code are all relevant (with appropriate rewording 8 ) to audit firms but the emphasis on each may be considerably different depending on whether or not the Code is focussed on the shareholders of audit client companies. While particular relevance should be attributed to A.1 (the Board) we would also emphasise the relevance of: A.5 Information and professional development A.6 Performance evaluation B.1 The level and make-up of remuneration C.1 Financial reporting 9 C.2 Internal control D.1 Dialogue with institutional shareholders 8 Rewording could be extensive, for example D.2 Constructive use of the AGM, could drop reference to the AGM but retain the principle of communication with, and encouragement of participation by, stakeholders. 9 This may be the area where the Code could contain a requirement equivalent to that in the Listing Rules which requires UK companies listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange to describe in the annual report and accounts their corporate governance.
19 Page 17 The main principle of internal control (C.2) will require considerable adaption and should encompass risk assessment of such matters as reputational threats arising from network structure and the firm s control over the quality of its audits. The latter must reflect decisions taken by the Working Group on the interface between the Code and other sources of information for stakeholders on audit quality. Question 18 Are there any compelling reasons for departing from the Combined Code structure of preamble, principles and provisions? Presentation in a similar form to the Combined Code would promote understanding of the Code by those familiar with the former. Having said that, the interactions between the three layers of: main principle, supporting principles and code provisions may not prove entirely suitable for the Code at this early time in its development. Given that the Combined Code is next scheduled for review in 2010, conformity between it and the Code could also be achieved by changing the Combined Code at that time. Question 19 Can you provide examples, whether or not derived from the Combined Code, from other non-listed company sectors where you think that appropriate governance codes have been developed, giving information on their potential relevance to the firms? In our response to question 17 above we invited the Working Group to use the principles in our policy paper Corporate Governance and Risk Management Agenda. Question 20 Do you have any other observations about matters not covered by earlier questions that you think would be useful to the Working Group in drafting the Audit Firm Governance Code? We draw attention to our general comments earlier in this response.
20 TECH-CDR-827.DOC
INSTITUTE OF DIRECTORS
Mr Norman Murray, Audit Firm Governance Working Group, Chartered Accountants Hall, PO Box 433, Moorgate Place, London EC2P 2BJ. 9 February 2009 Dear Mr Murray, Audit Firm Governance: Evidence Gathering
More informationAUDIT FIRM GOVERNANCE
AUDIT FIRM GOVERNANCE A PROJECT FOR THE FINANCIAL REPORTING COUNCIL EVIDENCE GATHERING CONSULTATION PAPER Audit Firm Governance Working Group Chairman: Norman Murray October 2008 The ICAEW operates under
More informationComments from ACCA April 2008
ISA 402 AUDIT CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO AN ENTITY USING A THIRD PARTY SERVICE ORGANIZATION Proposed revised and redrafted International Standard on Auditing issued for comment by the International Auditing
More informationComments from ACCA September 2011
ENHANCING THE VALUE OF AUDIT REPORTING: EXPLORING OPTIONS FOR CHANGE A consultation paper issued for comment by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Comments from ACCA September 2011
More informationA FRAMEWORK FOR AUDIT QUALITY. KEY ELEMENTS THAT CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT FOR AUDIT QUALITY February 2014
A FRAMEWORK FOR AUDIT QUALITY KEY ELEMENTS THAT CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT FOR AUDIT QUALITY February 2014 This document was developed and approved by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
More informationThe value of audit: views from retail (private) investors
The value of audit: views from retail (private) investors A RESEARCH PROJECT conducted IN COLLABORATION WITH THE SECURITIES INVESTORS ASSOCIATION (SINGAPORE) (SIAS) the VALUE OF AUDIT: Views from RETAIL
More informationWe suggest the Consultative Document consider a two prong approach which:
Ernst & Young Global Limited Becket House 1 Lambeth Palace Road London, SE1 7EU Tel: +44 (0)207 980 0004 Fax: +44 (0)207 980 0275 www.ey.com 21 June 2013 Secretariat of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
More informationIoD Code of Practice for Directors
The Four Pillars of Governance Best Practice Institute of Directors in New Zealand (Inc). IoD Code of Practice for Directors This Code provides guidance to directors to assist them in carrying out their
More informationSport Governance and Administration
Sport Governance and Administration Sample mark scheme January 2016 ICSA 2015 Page 1 of 19 Section A Question 1 This question draws on material provided in Module 1, Section A and may draw on elements
More informationINTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 260 COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE CONTENTS
Introduction INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 260 COMMUNICATION WITH THOSE CHARGED WITH GOVERNANCE (Effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2009) +
More information12. The prospective non-executive director
12. Martin Webster, Pinsent Masons LLP The role of a non-executive director is vital to the good governance of a publicly quoted company and there is no shortage of eligible candidates to sit around the
More informationRemuneration Consultants Group
Remuneration Consultants Group The Board s activities in 2014 and the review of the effectiveness of the Code September 2014 Page 1 of 15 Contents A. The RCG and its activities in 2014... 3 B. The Review
More informationTerms of Reference - Audit Committee
1. Membership 1.1 The committee shall comprise at least three members. Members of the committee shall be appointed by the board, on the recommendation of the nomination committee in consultation with the
More informationReview of Corporate Governance of UK Banking Industry and financial services initial call for evidence
Sir David Walker Financial Services Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS Sent by email to: feedback@walkerreview.org 31 May 2009 Dear Sir David initial call for evidence The Institute
More informationConsultation on guidance on aspects of the ICAEW Code of Ethics
Consultation on guidance on aspects of the ICAEW Code of Ethics A document issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales Comments from March 2016 (the Association of Chartered Certified
More informationAudit Committee - Terms of Reference
1 Membership 1.1 Members of the Committee shall be appointed by the Board, on the recommendation of the Nomination Committee in consultation with the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Committee shall
More informationProposed Revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code. Appendix A Revised UK Corporate Governance Code
Consultation Financial Reporting Council December 2017 Proposed Revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code Appendix A Revised UK Corporate Governance Code The FRC s mission is to promote transparency
More informationEthical leadership and corporate citizenship. Applied. Applied. Applied. Company s ethics are managed effectively.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE- KING III COMPLIANCE Analysis of the application as at 24 June 2015 by Master Drilling Group Limited (the Company) of the 75 corporate governance principles as recommended by the King
More informationTHE COMBINED CODE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
THE COMBINED CODE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Financial Reporting Council 2003 ISBN1 84140 406 3 Electronic copies of this volume and related material are available on the FRC website:http://www.frc.org.uk/combined.cfm.
More informationREGISTERED CANDIDATE AUDITOR (RCA) TECHNICAL COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS
REGISTERED CANDIDATE AUDITOR (RCA) TECHNICAL COMPETENCE REQUIREMENTS 1. Context After completion of the recognised training contract, a period of specialisation is required, appropriate to the level required
More informationCorporate governance. codes compared. Corporate governance codes compared 01
Corporate governance codes compared Corporate governance codes compared 01 Contents 03 Overview 04 Framework and Reporting 05 Ethical Standards 06 Diversity 07 Independence on the board 08 Audit Committee
More informationAudit & Risk Committee Charter
Audit & Risk Committee Charter Status: Approved Custodian: Executive Office Date approved: 2014-03-14 Implementation date: 2014-03-17 Decision number: SAQA 04103/14 Due for review: 2015-03-13 File Number:
More informationKING III COMPLIANCE ANALYSIS
Principle element No Application method or explanation This document has been prepared in terms of the JSE Listings Requirements and sets out the application of the 75 Principles of the King III Report
More informationGuidance for audit committees. Evaluating your auditors
Guidance for audit committees Evaluating your auditors November 2003 The Combined Code on Corporate Governance July 2003 C.3 Audit Committee and Auditors Main Principle: The board should establish formal
More informationRISK AND AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE
RISK AND AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE Brief description Defines the Terms of Reference for the Risk and Audit Committee. BHP Billiton Limited & BHP Billiton Plc BHP Billiton Limited & BHP Billiton
More informationFor personal use only
Global Value Fund Limited A.C.N. 168 653 521 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT The board of Directors of Global Value Fund Limited (the Company) is responsible for the corporate governance of the Company.
More informationHSBC HOLDINGS PLC GROUP AUDIT COMMITTEE. Terms of Reference
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC GROUP AUDIT COMMITTEE Terms of Reference 1. Purpose The Board of HSBC Holdings plc ( the Company ) has delegated responsibility to the Group Audit Committee ( the Committee ) for matters
More informationIndivior PLC. Terms of Reference of the Audit Committee. Adopted: November 5, 2014 Last Updated: September 22, 2016 Owner: Company Secretary
Indivior PLC Terms of Reference of the Audit Committee Adopted: November 5, 2014 Last Updated: September 22, 2016 Owner: Company Secretary AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE 1. Purpose and Policy 1.1 The
More informationAudit Committee Forum TM
Audit Committee Forum TM Position Paper 9 Guidelines for assessing the performance of an audit committee The Audit Committee Forum TM is proudly sponsored by KPMG. Audit Committee Forum TM 1 Position Paper
More informationCorporate Governance Code
1 2 Public hearing document No. AorSorPor. 32/2559 Corporate Governance Code Distributed on July 22, 2016 The SEC drafted this document for conducting the public hearing. To download this document, please
More informationAuditor Independence Policy
Auditor Independence Policy Why Auditor Independence Matters Audit Review ~ May 2012 Auditor Independence Policy Why Auditor Independence Matters Contents Introduction 2 The International Dimension 2 The
More informationconcerns regarding the definition and suggest revised wording.
DRAFT CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FOR PUBLICLY-LISTED COMPANIES NAME: REPRESENTED INSTITUTION: PART of the CODE of CORPORATE COMMENTS GOVERNANCE Principle 16 The last sentence of Principle 16 in page
More informationAlfa Financial Software Holdings PLC Terms of Reference of The Audit and Risk Committee of The Board of Directors of The Company
Alfa Financial Software Holdings PLC Terms of Reference of The Audit and Risk Committee of The Board of Directors of The Company adopted by the board on 15 May 2017 1. Background 1.1 The board has resolved
More informationHuman Resources Committee Charter
Human Resources Committee Charter Contents 1. Standing Rules for ANZ Board Committees 2. Purpose 3. Powers of the Human Resources Committee 4. Duties of the Human Resources Committee 4.1 Non-Executive
More informationFebruary 28, Catherine Horton Financial Reporting Council 8 th Floor 125 London Wall London EC2Y 5AS
Royal Dutch Shell plc Carel van Bylandtlaan 30 2596 HR The Hague The Netherlands Internet http://www.shell.com February 28, 2018 Catherine Horton Financial Reporting Council 8 th Floor 125 London Wall
More informationAudit Transparency Report 2016
Audit Transparency Report 2016 Contents Page Introduction 1 Legal structure and ownership 1 Leadership and governance 1-2 Quality procedures, Ethics and Objectivity 2-8 Public interest entities listing
More informationProposed Revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code
Consultation Financial Reporting Council December 2017 Proposed Revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code The FRC s mission is to promote transparency and integrity in business. The FRC sets the UK
More informationAGL ENERGY LIMITED BOARD CHARTER 1. PURPOSE 2. ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF BOARD
AGL ENERGY LIMITED BOARD CHARTER 1. PURPOSE 1.1 The Board is responsible for the governance of AGL Energy Limited (AGL). This Board Charter (Charter) sets out the role, responsibilities, membership and
More informationBoard Charter Z Energy Limited
Board Charter Z Energy Limited Z Energy Limited ( Z Energy ) is committed to the highest standards of corporate governance. This Board Charter ( Charter ) is the foundation document which sets out the
More informationBasel Committee on Banking Supervision. Consultative Document. External audits of banks. Issued for comment by 21 June 2013
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Consultative Document External audits of banks Issued for comment by 21 June 2013 March 2013 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). Bank
More informationEstia Health Limited ACN ( Company ) Approved by the Board on 17 November 2014
Board Charter Estia Health Limited ACN 160 986 201 ( Company ) Approved by the Board on 17 November 2014 Board Charter Contents 1 Purpose of this charter 1 2 Role and responsibilities of the Board 1 2.1
More informationProposed application material relating to professional scepticism and professional judgement
Proposed application material relating to professional scepticism and professional judgement An exposure draft issued for public consultation by the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants
More informationWorking with the external auditor
Working with the external auditor 0 Audit committees have an essential role to play in ensuring the integrity and transparency of corporate reporting. The PwC Audit Committee Guide is designed to help
More informationAudit Transparency Report 2014
Audit Transparency Report 2014 Contents Page Introduction 1 Legal structure and ownership 1 Leadership and governance 1-2 Quality procedures, Ethics and Objectivity 2-8 Public interest entities listing
More informationAuditQuality Q a. Fundamentals Auditor reporting CONSULTATION DRAFT
AuditQuality Q a Fundamentals Auditor reporting CONSULTATION DRAFT Is current auditor reporting, in particular the audit report, helpful to shareholders? This paper considers the information that auditors
More informationQatar, 24 May Basel II and Corporate Governance Issues
Qatar, 24 May 2005 Basel II and Corporate Governance Issues 2nd IFSB Summit 2005: The Rise and Effectiveness of Corporate Governance in the Islamic Financial Services Industry. Islamic Financial Services
More informationVOLUNTARY CODE OF CONDUCT IN RELATION TO EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION CONSULTING IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
VOLUNTARY CODE OF CONDUCT IN RELATION TO EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION CONSULTING IN THE UNITED KINGDOM (December 2015) Preamble Executive remuneration consultants are business advisers who provide a valuable
More informationChapter 4. Audit regulation
Chapter 4 Audit regulation Learning objectives To describe the form of regulation governing the work of auditors in the UK. To explain the role of the various bodies involved in the regulation of auditing.
More information3410N Assurance engagements relating to sustainability reports
3410N Assurance engagements relating to sustainability reports Royal NIVRA 3410N ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS RELATING TO SUSTAINABILITY REPORTS Introduction Scope of this Standard ( T1 and T2) 1. This Standard
More informationSummary findings inspection quality of statutory audits Big 4 firms
Page 1 of 6 Summary findings inspection quality of statutory audits Big 4 firms Between April 2013 and the end of July 2014, the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) carried out regular
More informationCorporate Governance. Syllabus
Corporate Governance Syllabus Corporate Governance Module outline and aims The aim of the Corporate Governance module is to equip the Chartered Secretary with the knowledge and key skills necessary to
More informationCGIAR System Management Board Audit and Risk Committee Terms of Reference
Approved (Decision SMB/M4/DP4): 17 December 2016 CGIAR System Management Board Audit and Risk Committee Terms of Reference A. Purpose 1. The purpose of the Audit and Risk Committee ( ARC ) of the System
More informationSupervisory Board Charter of the Audit Committee
Adopted by the Supervisory Board on September 8, 2004 Amendment approved by the Supervisory Board December 8, 2009 Amendment approved by the Supervisory Board June 18, 2014 CONTENT 0. INTRODUCTION... 3
More informationAudit Committee effectiveness
Audit Committee effectiveness LICENCE TO OPERATE Governance in focus Audit Committee effectiveness 2017 Edition Contents How to use the effectiveness framework 01 Framework questions 03 Contacts 21 About
More informationSTATE OWNED ENTERPRISES REMUNERATION GUIDELINES
STATE OWNED ENTERPRISES REMUNERATION GUIDELINES PART A CHAIRPERSONS & NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS AUGUST 2007 Restricted Contents 1. DEFINITIONS 3 2. PURPOSE 4 3. GENERAL 4 4. REMUNERATION GUIDELINES 5 5.
More informationThis document contains a summary of the Group s application of all of the principles contained in King III.
King III Compliance The Board supports the Code of Corporate Practices and Conduct as recommended by the King III Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa 2009 ( King III ). This document contains
More informationInternational Forum of Independent Audit Regulators Report on 2013 Survey of Inspection Findings April 10, 2014
Executive Summary International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators Report on 2013 Survey of Inspection Findings April 10, 2014 This report summarizes the results of the second survey conducted by the
More informationAchieve. Performance objectives
Achieve Performance objectives Performance objectives are benchmarks of effective performance that describe the types of work activities students and affiliates will be involved in as trainee accountants.
More informationInternational Forum of Independent Audit Regulators
Meeting of the International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators, Berlin, April 2011 International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators PRESS RELEASE Meeting highlights IFIAR Members agreed upon a set
More informationAuditing Standards and Practices Council
Auditing Standards and Practices Council PHILIPPINE STANDARD ON AUDITING 315 UNDERSTANDING THE ENTITY AND ITS ENVIRONMENT AND ASSESSING THE RISKS OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT PHILIPPINE STANDARD ON AUDITING
More informationACCA. Paper P1. Governance, risk and ethics. Pocket notes
ACCA Paper P1 Governance, risk and ethics Pocket notes Governance, risk and ethics British library cataloguing-in-publication data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
More informationSEMPRA ENERGY. Corporate Governance Guidelines. As adopted by the Board of Directors of Sempra Energy and amended through December 15, 2017
SEMPRA ENERGY Corporate Governance Guidelines As adopted by the Board of Directors of Sempra Energy and amended through December 15, 2017 I Role of the Board and Management 1.1 Board Oversight Sempra Energy
More information- 1 - Ethics and you. An introduction to the CIPFA Standard of Professional Practice on Ethics. July
- 1 - Ethics and you An introduction to the CIPFA Standard of Professional Practice on Ethics July 2017-1 - CIPFA members must follow fundamental principles set out in the International Standards Board
More informationEnglish Translation (For Information Purposes Only) CODE OF BEST CORPORATE PRACTICES. Introduction
English Translation (For Information Purposes Only) SCHEDULE A CODE OF BEST CORPORATE PRACTICES Introduction Upon the initiative of the Business Coordinating Council, the Corporate Governance Committee
More informationINTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 315 UNDERSTANDING THE ENTITY AND ITS ENVIRONMENT AND ASSESSING THE RISKS OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT CONTENTS
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 315 UNDERSTANDING THE ENTITY AND ITS ENVIRONMENT AND ASSESSING THE RISKS OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT (Effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning
More informationFor personal use only
On Q Group Limited CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 1. Introduction The Board of Directors of On Q Group Limited ( Company ) is responsible for the Company's corporate governance framework, as set out in
More informationStakeholders. Shareholders. Societal licence Shareholders Corporate governance. Viability. Corporate governance reform
The Deloitte Academy December 2017 Governance in brief Stakeholders Societal licence Shareholders Responsible business Transparency Corporate governance Viability Company purpose Audit committee Culture
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE KING III COMPLIANCE REGISTER 2017
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE KING III COMPLIANCE REGISTER 2017 This document has been prepared in terms of the JSE Listing Requirements and sets out the application of the 75 corporate governance principles by
More informationENHANCING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ENHANCING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FOR BANKING ORGANISATIONS (September 1999) I. Introduction 1. There has been a great deal of attention given recently to the issue of corporate governance in various national
More informationFinancial Reporting Council BDO LLP AUDIT QUALITY INSPECTION
Financial Reporting Council BDO LLP AUDIT QUALITY INSPECTION JUNE 2017 The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is the UK s independent regulator responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance
More informationCorporate Governance Statement John Bridgeman Limited
Corporate Governance Statement John Bridgeman Limited 1 Definition In this document: ASX Board Chair CFO Company Secretary Corporations Act Director means ASX Limited ACN 008 624 691 or the securities
More informationBOARD GUIDELINES ON SIGNIFICANT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ISSUES
BOARD GUIDELINES ON SIGNIFICANT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ISSUES Management and the Board of Directors ( Board ) of Nabors Industries Ltd. (the Company ) are committed to conducting business consistent with
More informationKING III CHECKLIST. We do it better
KING III CHECKLIST 2016 We do it better 1 KING III CHECKLIST African Rainbow Minerals Limited (ARM or the Company) supports the principles and practices set out in the King Report on Governance for South
More informationCaribbean Association of Audit Committee Members Inc. Independent Quality Assurance Assessment of the Internal Audit function
www.pwc.com/bb Caribbean Association of Audit Committee Members Inc. Independent Quality Assurance Assessment of the Internal Audit function Strengthening the Performance and Influence of the Audit Committee
More informationTerms of reference for the risk committee
Guidance note Terms of reference for Contents: A Introduction B The UK Corporate Governance Code C The Walker Review D Kay Review E Thematic review on risk governance F Model terms of reference June 2013
More informationAUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE. Approved February 2016
1. Constitution AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE Approved February 2016 It is hereby resolved that the Audit Committee of the Board of Alliance Trust PLC formed by resolution of the directors
More informationHCCA Professional Code of Ethics
HCCA Professional Code of Ethics DISPLAY DRAFT CODE OF ETHICS FOR HEALTH CARE COMPLIANCE PROFESSIONALS ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 15, 1999 PREAMBLE Health care compliance programs are ultimately judged by how they
More informationKING IV APPLICATION REGISTER. We do it better
KING IV APPLICATION REGISTER 2017 We do it better 1 KING IV APPLICATION REGISTER APPLICATION OF KING IV African Rainbow Minerals Limited (ARM or the Company) supports the governance outcomes, principles
More informationInstructions for the Board of Directors of SpareBank 1 SR-Bank ASA
Instructions for the Board of Directors of SpareBank 1 SR-Bank ASA In accordance with Section 6-23 of the Public Limited Companies Act, the Board has formulated the following instructions: 1. Objective
More informationFor personal use only
Rules 4.7.3 and 4.10.3 1 Appendix 4G Key to Disclosures Corporate Governance Council Principles and Recommendations Name of entity Victory Mines Limited ABN/ARBN Financial year ended 39 151 900 855 30
More informationCorporate governance in New Zealand
Corporate governance in New Zealand Principles and guidelines A handbook for directors, executives and advisers Financial Markets Authority Corporate Governance Handbook Contents Principles for corporate
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE King III - Compliance with Principles Assessment Year ending 31 December 2016
No N/A 1 Chapter 1 - Ethical leadership and corporate citizenship 1.1 The board s should provide effective leadership based on an ethical foundation 1.2 The board should ensure that the Company is and
More informationGOLD FIELDS LIMITED. ( GFI or the Company ) BOARD CHARTER. (Approved by the Board of Directors on 16 August 2016)
1 GOLD FIELDS LIMITED ( GFI or the Company ) BOARD CHARTER (Approved by the Board of Directors on 16 August 2016) 2 1. INTRODUCTION The Board Charter is subject to the provisions of the South African Companies
More informationBOISE CASCADE COMPANY
{BC Legal/179279/0005/01808611.DOC: } BOISE CASCADE COMPANY CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES (Adopted on February 4, 2013, as Updated Through May 4, 2017) The following Corporate Governance Guidelines (these
More informationFinance, Audit & Risk Management Committee Terms of Reference
Finance, Audit & Risk Management Committee Terms of Reference Version: 1.0 Effective date:14/04/2016 Name of Document: Finance, Audit and Risk Committee - Terms of Reference Version: Version 1.0 Created/Reviewed:
More informationIncreasing the Intensity and Effectiveness of Supervision
Increasing the Intensity and Effectiveness of Supervision Consultative Document Guidance on Supervisory Interaction with Financial Institutions on Risk Culture 18 November 2013 Table of Contents Page
More informationEstablishing a Multi-Stakeholder Group and National Secretariat
Construction Sector Transparency Initiative October 2013 / V1 Guidance Note: 4 Establishing a Multi-Stakeholder Group and National Secretariat Introduction An essential feature of CoST is the multi-stakeholder
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICY
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT Atlantic is committed to building a diversified portfolio of resources assets that deliver superior returns to shareholders. Atlantic will seek to achieve this through strong
More informationGROUP AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE
Prepared by: Legal & Secretarial Version: 2.0 Status: Signed Off Owned by: Group Board Authorised by: Group Board Dept: Legal & Secretarial Sign-Off Date: 15/03/2017 GROUP AUDIT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE
More informationFinancial Reporting Council AUDIT TENDERS NOTES ON BEST PRACTICE
Financial Reporting Council AUDIT TENDERS NOTES ON BEST PRACTICE FEBRUARY 2017 The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) is the UK s independent regulator responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance
More informationAPB ETHICAL STANDARD 4 (REVISED) FEES, REMUNERATION AND EVALUATION POLICIES, LITIGATION, GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY
APB ETHICAL STANDARD 4 (REVISED) FEES, REMUNERATION AND EVALUATION POLICIES, LITIGATION, GIFTS AND HOSPITALITY (Revised December 2010) Contents paragraph Introduction 1-4 Fees 5-43 Remuneration and evaluation
More informationKing iii checklist 2013
King III checklist 2013 King III checklist 2013 1 King III checklist African Rainbow Minerals Limited (ARM or the Company) supports the principles and practices set out in the King Report on Governance
More informationKing lll Principle Comments on application in 2016 Reference Chapter 1: Ethical leadership and corporate citizenship Principle 1.
Clicks Group Application of King III Principles 2016 APPLICATION OF King III PrincipleS 2016 This document has been prepared in terms of the JSE Listings Requirements and sets out the application of King
More information1. Managing conflict of interest in certification
1. Managing conflict of interest in certification 10.1 Purpose The purpose of this procedure is to establish, implement and maintain a documented process for identifying, analyzing, evaluating and determining
More informationChapter 3. The meaning and. importance of auditor independence
Chapter 3 The meaning and importance of auditor independence Learning objectives To explain importance of auditor independence and practical implications for auditor in meeting demands of audit role. To
More informationDineEquity, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines
DineEquity, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines The following Corporate Governance Guidelines have been adopted by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of DineEquity, Inc. (the Corporation ) to assist
More informationIAESB Exposure Draft: Proposed Revised International Education Standard IES 1, Entry Requirements to Professional Accounting Education
By email September 2011 Technical Manager International Accounting Education Standards Board IFAC ACCA s response to the IAESB Exposure Draft IAESB Exposure Draft: Proposed Revised International Education
More informationBERMAZ AUTO BERHAD (formerly known as Berjaya Auto Berhad) (Company No M) BOARD CHARTER
(formerly known as Berjaya Auto Berhad) (Company No. 900557-M) BOARD CHARTER 1. INTRODUCTION The Board of Directors ( the Board ) is responsible for the performance and affairs of the Company and its subsidiaries
More informationGrant Thornton UK LLP
Public Report Professional discipline Financial Reporting Council May 2016 Grant Thornton UK LLP Audit Quality Inspection The FRC is responsible for promoting high quality corporate governance and reporting
More informationThe Sector Skills Council for the Financial Services Industry. National Occupational Standards. Risk Management for the Financial Sector
The Sector Skills Council for the Financial Services Industry National Occupational Standards Risk Management for the Financial Sector Final version approved April 2009 IMPORTANT NOTES These National Occupational
More information