TUPE Reforms: the next steps
|
|
- Betty Norris
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TUPE Reforms: the next steps Earlier this year the Government published a consultation seeking views on proposed reforms to the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE). The consultation set out a package of measures designed to reduce the complexity surrounding TUPE and the practical difficulties encountered by organisations, including those in the pubic sector, when managing business or service transfers. It was also intended to address what was considered to be unnecessary gold-plating of the requirements of the EU Acquired Rights Directive, from which the UK Regulations stem, including the proposed repeal of the service provision changes (SPC) provision, often cited as a prime example of such gold-plating. This consultation formed part of the Government s on-going programme of employment law reform, designed to provide greater flexibility and effectiveness within the labour market. As HR professionals will be only too well aware, this programme has already brought about a number of regulatory changes, for example, increasing the qualifying period for making a complaint of unfair dismissal, reducing the time period for collective redundancy consultation, reforming the employment tribunal process and introducing fees for making tribunal claims, and changing equality and whistleblowing laws. Yet more changes are already in the pipeline, e.g. in relation to maternity, paternity and adoption leave and right to request flexible working. The outcomes from the TUPE consultation, which has recently been published by the Government, will add to the continuing list of changes which employers and HR professionals need to understand, become familiar with and assess the practical implications of for their organisations. Whilst the complexity of the current Regulations is no doubt widely recognised, commentators had expressed some trepidation that the repeal of specific measures, particularly that relating to service provision changes, would herald a return to the position prior to the current 2006 Regulations when there was considerable uncertainty, and much legal debate (and associated cost!) as to whether or not TUPE applied in particular circumstances. This was often a consideration for public sector organisations involved in the contracting-out of services. There was also a desire by many organisations that any reforms should provide greater flexibility in the Regulations by extending the scope for employers to harmonise terms and conditions following a TUPE transfer. (Although the Government had, perhaps, already dampened expectations on this issue by making clear in the consultation document the limitations on the scope for this type of change due to the requirements of the EU Directive) So what are the outcomes from this consultation and what practical implications will they have for HR professionals in the public sector? Deborah Moon, HR Consultant, summarises the main points, and considers the responses to the consultation, the Government s response and the changes now proposed. 1
2 Service Provision Changes The Government s earlier consultation document had looked at the position both under the EU Directive and as set out in the 2006 TUPE Regulations in relation to service provision changes and the circumstances in which a SPC may occur. It concluded that it was not clear that the intended benefits of the 2006 Regulations in this area (which brought the vast majority of SPCs within the scope of TUPE) had been realised. Indeed, there was a fear that there had been potentially anti-competitive effects as a result of avoidance measures taken by some organisations. The Government therefore set out its proposals to reverse the 2006 amendments relating to SPCs and align the definition of a transfer with that of the Directive. The Government felt that this could help the UK economy by making it easier for businesses to change the provider of a service. However, the Government has surprised many commentators by deciding that the SPC rules, which were added to the Regulations in 2006, should remain un-amended. In taking this decision, the Government appears to have listened to, and accepted, the views expressed by the 67% of respondents who did not support the repeal of SPCs. Reasons for these views included that the current Regulations: brought clarity for employers and employees and reduced the number of ET claims on this issue; created a level playing-field for contractors; provided continuity of staffing and security for service sector workers. Respondents were also concerned that the repeal of SPCs would: increase uncertainty and the potential for disputes; make commercial transactions more time-consuming and costly; have a detrimental impact on terms and conditions of employment. Whilst some potential advantages of repealing the SPC requirements were noted, for example, potential increased appetite for businesses to be involved in transfers and enhanced scope for innovative bids, the benefits of retaining them, particularly that of legal certainty, were felt to outweigh the potential benefits arising from repeal. The Government has therefore concluded that the responses to the consultation have presented a clear rationale for retaining the current SPC rules, thereby avoiding the potentially significant downsides of repealing them identified by respondents. The Government considers the uncertainty created by such a situation could hinder commercial agreements, damaging both the labour market and the wider economy. The Government also notes that some respondents called for professional services to be excluded from TUPE and considered whether it would be possible to provide an exception in certain circumstances. However, it has concluded that it would not be possible to draft an exception which would be precise enough, as well as identifying some other perceived problems with such an approach. 2
3 The document notes that there were also some calls for second generation contract changes and for micro-businesses or SMEs to be exempt from the SPC rules but the Government has also rejected these. Overall, the Government states that the SPC rules are an example of where good Regulation, additional to that required by a European Directive, can deliver benefits for both businesses and individuals. A somewhat surprising outcome, given the Government s previous stance on EU Regulation! In addition, as a number of commentators have noted, the Government s track-record on being prepared to accept views contrary to its own position on employment matters has not been particularly positive the introduction of employee shareholder contracts is, perhaps, a prime example of that! However, that is not the end of the matter, as the Government goes on to state its intention to amend the Regulations to reflect the approach set out in case law as to whether or not a TUPE SPC occurs, namely that for there to be a TUPE service provision change, the activities carried on after the change must be fundamentally or essentially the same as those carried on before it. This means that the greater the difference before and after the change, the less likely it is that it will be covered by the SPC provisions. This will, as always, depend on the particular circumstances and will ultimately be a matter for an Employment Tribunal to determine. However, the intention of this amendment is to provide a signal of the flexibility there may be in some service provision change situations. Employee Liability Information The current Regulations provide that certain information must be provided by the transferor to the transferee and by when. A number of practical problems had been identified with this and the Government had therefore proposed repealing this requirement, instead leaving the businesses involved in the transfer to agree among themselves how they would provide the information. This was another issue where the majority of respondents did not support the Government s proposed repeal, with 75% being against this. Although business representatives acknowledged the intended deregulatory nature of the proposal, it was considered that the provision of information is a significant part of the TUPE process and is commercially important. It was also felt that where the relationship between transferor and transferee may be difficult, the proposal could make such a situation worse. Improvements to the existing provisions were suggested and there was almost unanimous agreement that the current period for providing information of 14 days was too short a deadline, with 28 days being the time period most requested. As with the SPC proposals, the Government has taken note of the views expressed and has concluded that the current requirements should be retained. It has also taken note of the strength of feeling expressed on the time period for providing information and has decided to bring this forward to not less than 28 days before the transfer, rather than the current 14, other than where special circumstances make it not reasonably practical to comply (this exception applies currently). 3
4 The Government does not intend to increase the categories of information that should be provided, as argued by some respondents, nor does it intend to introduce a requirement that information be provided at the tendering stage in out-sourcing situations. However, on this latter point, it indicates that, when examining TUPE guidance, it will consider improvements such as the inclusion of model terms for contracts. Restrictions on terms and conditions One of the major concerns for employers over many years, including those in the public sector, has been the restrictions the Regulations place on them with regard to making post-transfer changes to terms and conditions the inability to harmonise employment contracts was identified as a burden by businesses when responding to the Government s initial call for evidence. Currently, terms and conditions cannot be varied, even if both parties agree to this, if those variations are connected with the transfer, unless they are due to an economic, technical or organisational (ETO) reason, entailing changes in the workforce, i.e. a change in workforce numbers or functions. Whilst it recognised this problem, the Government considered that there was a very high risk that any provision which allowed the parties to agree variations to terms and conditions for harmonisation purposes would be incompatible with the Acquired Rights Directive and EU case law. To seek to address this issue, the Government looked at whether any other amendments could be made to improve the situation and proposed to amend the current Regulation so that its wording more closely reflected that of the Directive and EU case law. 66% of respondents supported the Government s proposals, with a general view that the current Regulations go further than that required by the Directive. Many thought the proposed change could reduce the legal risk of altering terms and condition, although others thought it may not result in any practical difference, dependent on whether legal interpretation enabled more flexibility. This suggested that guidance would be necessary to mitigate any such legal uncertainty. Various other views were expressed, including that transferring employees may welcome more flexibility to discuss changes to terms and conditions and that consensual changes should be allowed. A number of views were expressed against the proposal, including that the Directive prohibits provisions which allow for harmonisation, that there was sufficient flexibility currently to allow for variations to the benefit of transferring employees, for an ETO reason or for a reason not connected to the transfer. Others felt this issue could be addressed through a properly negotiated collective agreement and were concerned that the proposed change could result in a worsening of pay and conditions for transferring employees. The Government has now confirmed its view that the present wording of the Regulations goes further than the Directive and will therefore amend this accordingly, with the exact drafting of the revised provision yet to be finalised. It goes on to state that it considers the new provision will continue to provide employee protection and will not result in 4
5 wholesale reductions in terms and conditions. The amendment will also seek to provide that unilateral variations to contracts are permissible where they are pursuant to a contractual provision, e.g. a mobility clause, and where such a change would be permitted had there not been a transfer (this was one issue identified by a number of respondents to the consultation). The Government has also confirmed it will retain the current ETO exception (supported by 83% of respondents), although recognises this may be of limited use in practice. However, the Government intends to amend TUPE so that a change in the location of the workplace is within the meaning of entailing changes in the workforce and can therefore be capable of being an ETO (see also change in workplace location, below). This would enable the contract to be varied by agreement to provide for a new place of work (rather than the employee being made redundant) and might also be used where there may be changes to terms associated with a change in job function (which could amount to an ETO). The Government acknowledges the concerns of businesses about the issue of harmonisation and states it believes the UK economy would benefit from a framework which would allow individuals and their employers to agree mutually beneficial changes to terms and conditions in support of this objective. It sates that it will engage with European partners to demonstrate the potential benefits of a harmonisation framework for individuals and the economy. Whether this will lead to any material change and within what timescale, remains to be seen! It seems therefore that this issue will continue to be a source of frustration for employers, although the intended change may offer some enhanced scope for legitimate contractual changes to be made, including through the ETO exception route, although this is likely to depend on how the new provision will be interpreted by the Courts. Unfortunately, this may be another area for increased legal argument! TUPE and Collective Agreements As the document reflects, collective agreements play an important part in how employers and their workforces agree and manage terms and conditions this is a particularly relevant issue within the public sector where they are commonly found. The Regulations provide for the transfer of collective agreements on completion of a relevant transfer but the extent to which they are then binding on the transferee, particularly where the new employer is not represented in the relevant collective negotiating machinery, such as the NJC for Local Government Services, is an issue which has been considered by the courts on a number of occasions. In particular, this issue has focussed on whether the current requirement should be given a dynamic interpretation (where employees are entitled to the benefit of future collective agreements relating to their original employer), or a static one (where employees are only entitled to the terms of the collective agreement(s) applicable at the time of transfer). As readers of this article may be aware, this issue arose in the case of Parkwood Leisure v Alemo-Herron, on which the ECJ has recently given its decision. (This case involved an 5
6 employee who worked for the London Borough of Lewisham and who transferred to a private contractor. Following the transfer a revised rate of pay was agreed by the NJC but the contractor refused to pay this. The Court of Appeal held that the new employer was not bound by the increase as it had been negotiated after the relevant transfer. The Supreme Court then referred the issue to the ECJ) The ECJ has now decided that the Directive precludes Member States from providing for a dynamic approach where the transferee does not have the possibility of participating in the negotiation process of collective agreements concluded after the date of the transfer. Interestingly, the ECJ also concluded that the Directive does not have the sole aim of safeguarding employees interests in the event of a TUPE transfer but seeks to ensure a fair balance between the interests of both employees and employers. A requirement that the transferee employer honour a clause within a collective agreement negotiated and agreed after the transfer, where that employer has not participated in the collective bargaining process, would undermine such a balance and seriously reduce the transferee s contractual freedom and ability to conduct its business. The ECJ decision supports the view taken by the Government in its earlier consultation document that only collective agreements agreed at the date of transfer should bind the transferee, i.e. there should be a static rather than dynamic approach. The Government had also indicated that it was considering limiting the future applicability of terms and conditions derived from collective agreements to one year from the transfer, after which variations would be possible provided the overall change was no less favourable to the employee, and views were sought on these issues. 61% of respondents were in favour of a one-year post-transfer limit - perhaps, not surprisingly, businesses, charities/social enterprises, local government and legal representatives were generally in favour but employee representative organisations were generally opposed. Most respondents agreed to the proposed one year limit, with many concerned at the impact on the new employer of collectively agreed post-transfer changes where that organisation was not party to the relevant negotiations. Some felt that the one year limit could help in enabling post-transfer variations, with fewer sets of terms and conditions for the employer to manage and a better integrated workforce. However, opponents saw this as another change which could lead to a downward pressure on transferring employees terms and conditions, limiting the ability of trade unions to protect their members interests through the collective bargaining process. The need for clarity on the position of collective agreements incorporated into individual contracts of employment and how the proposed one year limit would operate in these circumstances was another issue raised by respondents. Many respondents were in favour of including the proposed no less favourable overall condition in relation to any changes, which was seen as providing protection for employees and preventing the erosion of terms and condition, an issue which the trade unions were concerned about. However, the difficulty of defining no less favourable 6
7 overall was seen as potentially problematic, requiring clear guidance to limit the prospect of dispute. Most respondents supported a static approach on this issue, as described above, which was seen as providing certainty for transferee employers. The Government has therefore confirmed that it intends to amend the Regulations so that, one year after the transfer, the restriction on variations to contracts will no longer apply in respect of changes to terms derived from, or incorporating, collective agreements, provided that any change is no less favourable overall. The Government will also amend the Regulations to provide for a static approach to the transfer of terms derived from collective agreements. This means that only those terms existing at the date of transfer will be binding on the transferee and not those agreed subsequently where the transferee is neither party to those agreements nor to the relevant bargaining process. Protection against dismissal The underlying purpose of the Directive and the Regulations is, of course, to protect employees who transfer from one business to another. However, the current Regulations take a wider approach on this particular issue to that under the Directive, as they provide that a dismissal will be automatically unfair if the sole or principal reason is: a relevant transfer; or a reason connected with a relevant transfer that is not an ETO reason. The Government had therefore proposed amending the relevant wording to more closely reflect that of the Directive and EU case law. 76% of respondents supported this proposal again, not surprisingly, businesses, local government and legal representatives were generally in favour but employee representative organisations were predominately opposed. Generally, those in favour, felt the current Regulations were more restrictive than that required by the Directive and provided enhanced protection for transferring employees, relative to those not subject to a transfer. Opponents to the proposed change felt the current wording accurately reflected the EU position, with concerns expressed about the potential effects of weakening the current protections. The Government has concluded that, whilst it is important to ensure fairness in the labour market, both generally and during a transfer, there is a need to ensure that the Regulations do not regulate more than they need to. The Government considers the present wording of this particular provision is too wide and will therefore amend the relevant Regulation to bring it more closely in line with the Directive and EU case law. This will mean that dismissals which are connected to a transfer will not be automatically unfair (although the document notes this will be a new test when considering a TUPE dismissal claim) and that the Government will provide guidance on this. Dismissals where the reason is the transfer itself will remain automatically unfair. Whilst this less restrictive approach will undoubtedly be welcomed by many, it will be hoped that it does not create 7
8 greater uncertainty (identified as a potential short term effect of the change) and scope for increased legal argument. Substantial change in working conditions Currently, where a relevant transfer involves, or would involve, a substantial change in working conditions to the material detriment of the employee whose contract is, or would be, transferred, the employee may regard the contract as terminated and is treated as having been dismissed by the employer. The earlier consultation considered the problems which can arise from this provision, proposing that the scope of it should be narrowed to more closely reflect the wording of the Directive, the aim being to reduce some of the difficulties currently encountered. 67% of respondents supported the Government s proposal, agreeing that this change should remove the enhanced protection that transferring employees have of being able to claim unfair dismissal where there has not been a repudiatory breach of contract (and which would otherwise not give rise to an unfair dismissal claim). Employees would still be protected in genuine constructive dismissal cases. Opponents to the proposals (again, primarily trade unions or staff associations) considered the current provisions were appropriate and fully met the Directive s aim of preserving employees terms and conditions when a transfer takes place, suggesting that such a limitation on this could open the Regulations to challenge through the European Courts. In its response, the Government notes the strong support for the proposed amendment but, on reflection, considers that a copy out approach would not achieve the desired result. It notes that the situation which seems to be of most concern is a change in the employee s place of work. As noted above, the Government intends to include change of workplace location as capable of amounting to an ETO reason, so that an automatic unfair dismissal claim would not necessarily arise in these circumstances. The Government has decided that the proposed change would have added to the regulatory burden on businesses and would have added additional complexity to the Regulations. It has therefore decided not to amend the relevant regulations as originally proposed. Dismissals arising from a change in workplace location In its earlier consultation, the Government highlighted the fact that the courts have interpreted the meaning of entailing changes in the workforce (as part of the ETO exception) to changes in the numbers employed or changes in the functions performed by employees. However, this does not align with the definition of redundancy in the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA). The effect of this is that where the transferee employer intends to carry on the business in a different place, but with the same number of staff overall, then any dismissals as a result of a change in location would be automatically unfair. To address this discrepancy, the Government proposed amending the Regulations so that entailing changes in the workforce should be extended to include a change in the location of the workforce and would therefore come within the ETO exception. 8
9 79% of respondents were in favour of this change, identifying that many businesses need to change the location of the transferring undertaking, and this would therefore reflect business reality. It was also noted that the proposed change would remove the current anomaly whereby TUPE offered greater protection in this type of situation than that under the ERA. It was also considered important that TUPE did not undermine any contractual flexibility with regard to geographic mobility clauses. In its response, the Government has reflected on the dynamic nature of businesses and the economy, which will necessitate organisational changes such as moving locations. It considers the Directive recognises, and provides a framework for, organisational change following a transfer. However, the Government also recognises the concerns expressed by some respondents about the potential for employees being forced to change their work location and confirms that normal contract law and equality/discrimination provisions will continue to apply. The Government has therefore confirmed that it will amend the Regulations so that changes in location of the workforce, following a transfer, can be within the scope of ETOs. This will mean that, in future, employees dismissed by the employer due to a change in workplace would be unlikely to be able to claim automatically unfair dismissal, although the normal unfair dismissal and redundancy protections will still continue to apply. Consultation on collective redundancies The Government consulted on proposals which would enable pre-transfer consultation to count towards the collective redundancy requirements. This would enable the transferee employer to start consulting transferring staff about potential dismissals before they transferred to its employment. 66% of respondents supported this proposal for a number of reasons, including that it would increase flexibility for employers, increase the efficiency and speed of any restructuring, and reduce uncertainty for employees, encouraging openness and honesty about changes to the workforce. However, the majority of trade union responses opposed the proposals, considering this would fast track redundancy consultation at the cost of employees rights and undermine their position during a TUPE transfer. The Government has now confirmed it will implement this proposal, making clear that this will be on a permissive/voluntary basis, and will be dependent on cooperation/agreement between the respective parties. However, the Government notes that there are several issues which will need to be considered more fully before this change can be implemented, for example, at what point pre-transfer consultation can begin with the affected staff. It also confirms that the accompanying guidance which will accompany the TUPE changes will cover this particular measure, presumably, addressing some of the practical concerns identified by respondents. 9
10 The Government has also confirmed that there will be no change to the Regulations to enable the transferor to rely on the transferee s ETO reason in respect of pre-transfer dismissals. Other comments In its consultation, the Government invited other comments on the issues covered and the document summarises the issues raised by respondents, noting that the most common theme related to pensions. A number of respondents noted a general concern that the scale of public sector pensions was preventing small companies from competing for public sector contracts. Although occupational pensions do not generally transfer under TUPE, there are other requirements relating to pension provision following a transfer and the document states that BIS will work with DWP to find ways of improving the information available to employers and scheme members. Reference is also made to the Fair Deal policy, which provides for public sector workers pension provision when transferring out of the public sector. The Government has previously confirmed that the overall approach to Fair Deal will be maintained but that, in future, this will be delivered by offering access to public service pension schemes for compulsorily transferred staff. The document states that the Government will announce the detail of the new policy and publish updated guidance later this year. Public sector organisations will no doubt wish to look out for and assess the practical implications of this. Timescales/next steps The Government states that intends to provide a lead-in period to enable employers to plan future transfers in line with the new rules. The Government intends that the new Regulations will be laid before Parliament in December The main reaction from employers and other commentators appears to have been one of relief (and surprise) that the Government has decided not to proceed with the proposed repeal of the SPC provision and that it has listened to the consultation responses on this point. There was general agreement that removing this provision would have created much uncertainty about whether TUPE did, or did not, apply in this type of situation and that outcome appears to have been avoided. The proposed amendment to this particular provision may, however, mean that material changes in the nature/delivery of the particular service may, in future, take certain transfers outside of the scope of TUPE. The increase in the time period for the provision of employee liability information is also likely to be welcomed by employers, although may be considered not to have gone far enough. Employers will clearly need to have regard to this revised timescale. The change in the wording of the provision relating to automatically unfair dismissals and that relating to a change in workplace location are also likely to be welcome developments, although such situations will still need to be carefully managed, with continuing regard to other relevant employment protections. 10
11 The change to the collective redundancy consultation arrangements should make such exercises easier to manage, although this will be dependent on co-operation and agreement between the parties. The changes regarding collective agreements should provide greater flexibility in this area, although the scope for post-transfer harmonisation will continue to present challenges for employers. The reaction from the trade unions on these and other intended changes suggests that there will still be plenty of issues for legal argument and debate! The changing nature of our public services has brought with it an increasingly diverse range of provision and delivery models, along with a requirement for greater flexibility in workforce arrangements. Public sector employers will no doubt hope that the planned TUPE changes will make these situations easier and more straightforward to manage. Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 Government Response to Consultation available on the Department for Business Innovation & Skills website at Deborah Moon is a Consultant in Human Resources and is a regular contributor to Croner-i HR for Local Government. Croner-i HR for Local Government is an on-line employment law and practice reference source designed specifically for HR Managers and their teams in local government. 11
Re: BVCA response to BIS consultation on "Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 proposed changes"
Ian Young Labour Market Directorate Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) 3 Floor Abbey 1 1 Victoria Street London SW1H 0ET 11 April 2013 Dear Sirs, Re: BVCA response to BIS consultation
More informationBIS: CALL FOR EVIDENCE EFFECTIVENESS OF TUPE REGULATIONS 2006
BRIEFING NOTE BIS: CALL FOR EVIDENCE EFFECTIVENESS OF TUPE REGULATIONS 2006 1. Context The Government is currently reviewing the 2006 TUPE Regulations. Although no detailed proposals for reform have been
More informationTransfers of Undertakings Recent developments. Catherine Barnard Trinity College, Cambridge
Transfers of Undertakings Recent developments Catherine Barnard Trinity College, Cambridge Outline of the talk 1. Sources and principles 2. Scope When is there a transfer of an undertaking? 3. Automatic
More informationFDA RESPONSE TO BIS CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED CHANGES TO TUPE 2006 REGULATIONS
2013 FDA RESPONSE TO BIS CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED CHANGES TO TUPE 2006 REGULATIONS Contact: Naomi Cooke, FDA Assistant General Secretary Address: 8 Leake Street, London, SE1 7NN Tel: 0207 401 5574 Email:
More informationEMPLOYMENT LEGISLATION IN Summary Timetable of known changes:
EMPLOYMENT LEGISLATION IN 2014 Despite 2014 being the last full year of office of the present coalition government, we can expect no slackening in the pace of employment law reform. The year ahead will
More informationAdvisory Bulletin July 2013 update: No. 603 Workforce: Employment Relations
Advisory Bulletin July 2013 update: No. 603 Workforce: Employment Relations In this issue: TUPE: STATIC APPROACH TO COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT CHANGES Case: Alemo-Herron and ors v Parkwood Leisure Ltd (ECJ)
More informationWelcome Citation Employment Law Seminar TUPE issues Time work and sleep-in
1 Welcome Citation Employment Law Seminar TUPE issues Time work and sleep-in 2 OBJECTIVE Know the correct process to follow for TUPE transfers Understand the present situation in relation to Zero hour
More informationTaking up the baton from the Taylor Review? Select Committees publish joint report and draft bill outlining a new framework for modern employment
Taking up the baton from the Taylor Review? Select Committees publish joint report and draft bill outlining a new framework for modern employment On 20 November 2017, the House of Commons Work and Pensions
More informationLEGISLATION TIMETABLE 2014
www.brodies.com LEGISLATION TIMETABLE 2014 TOPIC SUMMARY TIMETABLE January 2014 Cap on bankers bonuses ACAS Code on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures For certain code / identified staff, financial
More informationTUPE Policy. TUPE is an acronym for Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981.
TUPE Policy A guide to the regulations This brief describes the purpose of the TUPE regulations, what is covered by the regulations, the employer and employee position in a transfer, redundancy and union
More informationMODEL TUPE POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SCHOOLS / ACADEMIES
MODEL TUPE POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SCHOOLS / ACADEMIES This model policy will apply to both teaching and non-teaching staff and has been agreed with the following recognised unions: ATL, NUT, NAHT, NASUWT,
More informationTUPE - The Transfer of Undertakings Directive and Irish Employers
TUPE - The Transfer of Undertakings Directive and Irish Employers TUPE or the Transfer of Undertakings Directive of 1977, which became part of Irish law by the European Communities (Safeguarding of Employees
More informationBIS CALL FOR EVIDENCE: COLLECTIVE REDUNDANCY CONSULTATION RULES
BRIEFING NOTE BIS CALL FOR EVIDENCE: COLLECTIVE REDUNDANCY CONSULTATION RULES 1. Context The Government is currently reviewing the legal rules governing collective redundancy consultation (section 188-198
More information18/06/2014. The activities. Service provision changes
Institute of Employment Rights TUPE In Practice Liz Stephenson Service provision changes CRATUPEAR amends SPC in Reg 3(1)(b) slightly to indicate that in order for TUPE to apply the activities must be
More informationOil and Gas Employment Law: Alberta/B.C. FAQ
Oil and Gas Employment Law: Alberta/B.C. FAQ Managing Employment Issues in the Context of M&A Q How are employees treated in a share purchase transaction, as opposed to an asset purchase transaction? A
More informationa mechanism is in place to keep staff fully informed and involved in the process from the outset
ERU checklist guide to... Handling the TUPE process This checklist, for senior managers, personnel professionals and line managers, sets out key messages in handling a transfer under TUPE (the Transfer
More informationFixed Term Contract Policy
Policies Procedures & Guidelines Fixed Term Contract Policy Version: 2 Ratified by: Date ratified: July 2006 Name of originator/author: Lewisham Joint Staff Partnership Committee HR Department Date issued:
More informationEMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ON TRANSFERS OF UNDERTAKINGS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS ON TRANSFERS OF UNDERTAKINGS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM George-Dian Bălan Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi Abstract: In April 2006, in the UK, came into force new rules relating to the
More informationFrequently Asked Questions about Fixed-Term Contracts
Frequently Asked Questions about Fixed-Term Contracts To offer employment on a fixed-term contract is common practice for many organisations, especially when posts are funded only for a set period of time.
More informationSummary of the law on unfair dismissal and redundancy. Standing up for you
Summary of the law on unfair dismissal and redundancy www.thompsonstradeunion.law Our pledge to you Thompsons Solicitors has been standing up for the injured and mistreated since Harry Thompson founded
More informationDraft Code of Practice on Settlement Agreements. TUC response to Acas consultation
Draft Code of Practice on Settlement Agreements TUC response to Acas consultation Introduction The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has 53 affiliated unions which represent approximately 6 million members working
More informationINFORMATION AND CONSULTATION OBLIGATIONS
INFORMATION AND CONSULTATION OBLIGATIONS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In a situation where there is a transfer of an undertaking, both the transferor and the transferee will have a duty to inform and possibly to
More informationThe Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.
FAQ - STAFFING ACADEMIES SECTION 1 BECOMING A MULTI ACADEMY TRUST 1. What is a multi-academy trust (MAT)? A MAT is one academy trust, which governs a group of schools through a single set of members and
More informationAN IER RESPONSE. By Felicia Epstein
AN IER RESPONSE Collective Redundancies: Consultation on changes to the rules. A Department for Business, Innovation & Skills consultation document Published 2 June 2012. Closing date 19 September 2012
More informationthat these standards can only be delivered effectively by devolution of responsibility to the frontline;
UK GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S GREEN PAPER ON PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS AND COMMUNITY LAW ON PUBLIC CONTRACTS AND CONCESSIONS, MAY 2004 The UK Government welcomes the debate on the
More informationThe Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.
FAQ - STAFFING ACADEMIES 1. Who employs staff within an Academy? Academies operate independently of the Local Authority in a similar way to Voluntary Aided and Foundation Schools. Frodo Baggins Academy
More informationThe Brexit sextet. At number 1 Working Time
Whole swathes of British employment law derive from Europe. On the face of it, Brexit could give the UK power to repeal or reshape areas of employment legislation that some businesses dislike. Will it
More informationBar Council response to the Proposed Changes to the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE) 2006 consultation paper
Bar Council response to the Proposed Changes to the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE) 2006 consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the
More informationRedundancy. A Guide Lawyers 92 Firms 60 Countries
Redundancy A Guide 4600 Lawyers 92 Firms 60 Countries INTRODUCTION The decision to make employees redundant is never one that is taken lightly. In a situation likely to cause anxiety and stress to both
More informationGeneral Functions Committee Date 16 January 2012 Human Resources: TUPE Transfer Commitments. Deputy Chief Executive and Chief Finance Officer
AGENDA ITEM: 8 Page nos. 499-510 Meeting General Functions Committee Date 16 January 2012 Subject Human Resources: TUPE Transfer Commitments Report of Summary Deputy Chief Executive and Chief Finance Officer
More informationTUPE FAQs. for property transactions
TUPE FAQs for property transactions To assist in understanding what TUPE is and its application to property transactions, we have set out below the top ten frequently asked questions we receive from our
More informationTechnical factsheet Employment status: workers
Technical factsheet Employment status: workers This factsheet is part of a suite of employment factsheets and a pro forma contract and statement of terms and conditions that are updated regularly. These
More informationGuidance Understanding the implications arising from the appointment of shared School Business Managers
Guidance Understanding the implications arising from the appointment of shared School Business Managers May 2014 1 Contents Page 1. Welcome and introduction 3 2. Where to start? 4 Step 1 : Who will be
More informationRegardless of Brexit: There are already key differences between UK and Irish employment law. by Susan Battye, Elizabeth Mara
EMPLOYMENT, PENSIONS AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Regardless of Brexit: There are already key differences between UK and Irish employment law by Susan Battye, Elizabeth Mara Regardless of Brexit: There are already
More informationThree major points that must be kept in mind when dealing with the Working Time Regulations are :
USING THE WORKING TIME REGULATIONS 1998 The Working Time Regulations have been in force since 1st October 1998 and the TSSA has consulted with its legal advisors in producing the following guidance notes
More informationNinth Meeting of European Labour Court Judges
Ninth Meeting of European Labour Court Judges Geneva, 3-4 December 2001 AUSTRALIA THE ROLE OF LABOUR COURT JUDGES IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SOCIAL POLICIES Questionnaire General Reporter: Judge Stephen
More informationAdvisory Bulletin September 2013 update: No. 605 Workforce: Employment Relations
Advisory Bulletin September 2013 update: No. 605 Workforce: Employment Relations In this issue: REDUNDANCY: SELECTION METHOD Case: Mental Health Care (UK) Ltd v (1) Biluan (2) Makati (EAT) UNFAIR DISMISSAL:
More informationAcas consultation. on the revision of paragraphs 15 and 36 of the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Acas consultation on the revision of paragraphs 15 and 36 of the Acas Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures December 2013 Acas consultation on the revision of paragraphs 15 and 36 of
More informationEmployment Protection Act (1982:80)
Employment Protection Act (1982:80) Amendments: up to and including SFS 2016:1271 Introductory provisions Section 1 This Act applies to employees in the public or private sector. However, the following
More informationNHS North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group. Fixed Term Contract Policy
NHS North Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group Fixed Term Contract Policy Approved by: Quality and Assurance Group : Ratification date: May 2013 Review date: July 2015 Next Review date: July 2018 Page
More informationIntroduction. Executive Summary
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Taylor Review Increasing transparency in the labour market Response by Thompsons Solicitors May 2018 1. Thompsons is the UK s largest firm representing
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22 January 2010 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER INTERPRETATIVE NOTE ON DIRECTIVE 2009/72/EC CONCERNING COMMON RULES FOR THE INTERNAL MARKET IN ELECTRICITY AND DIRECTIVE
More informationDRAFT OPINION. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2016/0404(COD) of the Committee on Legal Affairs
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Legal Affairs 2016/0404(COD) 31.3.2017 DRAFT OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs for the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection on the
More informationConsultation Response
Consultation Response Good Work: the Taylor Review of Modern Employment Practices Consultation on measures to increase transparency in the UK labour market May 2018 Introduction The Law Society of Scotland
More informationPROTOCOL Flexible Working. Number: C 1401 Date Published: 22 October 2014
1.0 Summary of Changes This protocol has had section 3.7.3 Flexi-Time removed as requested by UNISON and agreed by HR. 2.0 What this Protocol is about Essex Police recognises the UK workforce is becoming
More information15489/14 TA/il 1 DG E 2 A
Council of the European Union Brussels, 20 November 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional Files: 2013/0028 (COD) 2013/0029 (COD) 15489/14 TRANS 528 CODEC 2240 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council
More informationRecent and pending government employment law changes
Recent and pending government employment law changes Key: In force Other Issue Changes Start date Background/ Implications ACAS Code Simplified dismissal process for small employers Call for evidence:
More informationCommittee on Industry, Research and Energy. of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2018/0112(COD) 6.9.2018 DRAFT OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy for the Committee on the Internal Market
More informationGuidance on negotiating a fixed-term contract policy in HE
Guidance on negotiating a fixed-term contract policy in HE Revised February 2009 It is UCU policy to seek, and campaign for, a significant reduction in the use of fixed-term contracts in higher education.
More informationTUPE in Contracts Presentation to CIPS. 18 February Lisa Gettins
TUPE in Contracts Presentation to CIPS 18 February 2015 Lisa Gettins Aims for Tonight A brief overview of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 and their relevance to
More informationSTATUTORY GUIDANCE TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES ON CONTRACTING.
STATUTORY GUIDANCE TO LOCAL AUTHORITIES ON CONTRACTING. THE TREATMENT OF EMPLOYMENT ISSUES WHEN EXERCISING A POWER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT 1. Introduction 1.1 This statutory guidance is issued by Scottish
More informationRestrictive covenants a guide for SME business owners and HR professionals
Restrictive covenants a guide for SME business owners and HR professionals A restrictive covenant is an explicit constraint placed on an employee which comes into effect on termination of their employment
More informationTUPE Update. James Goudie QC 8 th May 2017
TUPE Update James Goudie QC 8 th May 2017 Starting Point Whether relevant transfer Definition of SPC Concept of transfer by means of SPC for the purpose of TUPE Regulation 3(1)(b) broader than that of
More informationManaging Change Policy
Managing Change Policy 1. Introduction Schools and other Educational Establishments are continuously required to review the way in which they provide education and services. This policy sets out the principles
More information2.2 Further details of the statutory requirements for consultation and notification of redundancy situations are set out as Appendix 1.
ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE POLICY 1. Introduction 1.1 As the needs and expectations of students, funding bodies, stakeholders and partner organisations change, there will inevitably be the need to remodel service
More informationPublic Services, Co-operatives and Mutuals. Best practice guidance
Public Services, Co-operatives and Mutuals Best practice guidance 1 t Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Context 4 3. Workforce engagement and consultation 5 4. Governance 6 5. Commissioning of services 7 6.
More informationBT s response to Ofcom consultation document. Price Rises in Fixed Term Contracts
BT s response to Ofcom consultation document Price Rises in Fixed Term Contracts 14 March 2013 1 Executive Summary We welcome the opportunity to comment on this consultation on Price Rises in Fixed Term
More informationTHE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK, UNIONS - AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING RIGHTS RESOLUTION ACTU CONGRESS 1997
THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK, UNIONS - AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING RIGHTS RESOLUTION ACTU CONGRESS 1997 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Congress notes with concern the aggressive anti-union assaults contained in Commonwealth
More informationunfair dismissal and redundancy
Unite Legal Services Summary of the law on unfair dismissal and redundancy www.unitetheunion.org 2 Contents About this booklet 3 Unfair dismissal? 3 What about strikes and lock outs? 5 What is the procedure
More informationGuidance on Fixed Term Contracts
OWLS Academy Trust Guidance on Fixed Term Contracts Adopted by The OWLS Academy Trust on 28/11/2016 to take effect 01/01/2017 Next Review Due Policy developed by HR Services Phone: Email: Web: Twitter:
More informationGeneral Guide to Employment Law Introduction
General Guide to Employment Law Introduction In recent years, the relationship between employer and employee has been regulated more and more by legislation, much of which has originated at EU level. Human
More informationTechnical factsheet Settlement offers
Technical factsheet Settlement offers This factsheet is part of a suite of employment factsheets and a pro forma contract that are updated regularly. These are: The contract of employment The probationary
More informationInformation Requirements in the Consumer Rights Directive Proposal and in Other Directives
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY Information Requirements in the Consumer Rights Directive Proposal and in Other Directives IP/A/IMCO/NT/2010-14
More informationHuddersfield New College Further Education Corporation
Huddersfield New College Further Education Corporation Policy and Procedure for Handling Redundancy 1.0 Policy Statement 1.1 It is the College s policy to avoid making compulsory redundancies amongst its
More informationFIXED TERM CONTRACTS
FIXED TERM CONTRACTS Document Status: Version: Approved V1 DOCUMENT CHANGE HISTORY Version Date Comments (ie. viewed, or reviewed, amended, approved by person or committee Approved 19-Sep-2006 Transition
More informationThis leaflet aims to explain when and how a trade unionist can exercise these rights and what to do if an employer refuses to allow them.
The right to time off work for trade union duties and activities allows union members and officials time off work to acquire the skills they need and to work on behalf of their members. This leaflet aims
More informationThe EU and the Swedish collective agreement model
The EU and the Swedish collective agreement model Brussels Office of the Swedish Trade Unions 2015 Graphic form: LO Print: Bantorget Grafiska AB, Stockholm, Sweden 2015 15.02 200 Contents The EU and the
More informationEwan Hall GMB Convenor
Ewan Hall GMB Convenor ewan.hall@cumbria.gov.uk; gmb.convenor.cs@gmail.com; Mobile: 07711 434915 Mr J Barrett Assistant Director Early Help and Learning Cumbria County Council Lonsdale Building English
More informationEBA/CP/2013/12 21 May Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2013/12 21 May 2013 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards On Passport Notifications under Articles 35, 36 and 39 of the proposed Capital Requirements Directive Consultation Paper
More informationCODE OF PRACTICE HANDLING REDUNDANCY
CODE OF PRACTICE HANDLING REDUNDANCY Note: This publication is intended to provide general guidance only. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as doing so. Important Notice
More information1. Acas (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) welcomes the opportunity to respond to the government s consultation on employment status.
Good Work: The Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices Consultation on Employment Status Acas Council Response 1. Acas (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service) welcomes the opportunity to respond
More informationPrivatisation - The legislative framework
Privatisation - The legislative framework The legislation Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (the TUPE regs)
More informationRedundancy: Avoidance and Handling Policy and Procedure
2013 Redundancy: Avoidance and Handling Policy and Procedure 1. What is meant by Redundancy? 1.1 Redundancy arises when employees are dismissed because: The employer has ceased, or intends to cease, to
More informationPublic Procurement Procedures
Brief 10 September 2016 Public Procurement Public Procurement Procedures CONTENTS Introduction Main types of competitive procedures available When can each of the main competitive procedures be used? Innovation
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Guide to Transfer of Undertakings (TUPE)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Guide to Transfer of Undertakings (TUPE) TUPE Regulations apply if a business or part of a business moves to a new owner or merges with another business to make a brand new employer.
More informationWHISTLEBLOWING POLICY
WHISTLEBLOWING POLICY Version 1.0 Name of policy writer HR Date written July 2017 Last updated July 2017 Approved by Trustees Record of Alterations Version 1.0 Original CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Purpose
More informationFlexible Working Guidance
Flexible Working Guidance Date of Review: March 2018 Approved by: Trust Board Next Review Date: March 2019 Contents Introduction 2 1. Forms of Flexible Working 2 1.1 Job Share 3 1.2 Flexible Hours 3 1.3
More informationFlexible Working Guidance
Flexible Working Guidance Date of Review: March 2018 Approved by: Trust Board Next Review Date: May 2019 Contents Introduction 2 1. Forms of Flexible Working 2 1.1 Job Share 3 1.2 Flexible Hours 3 1.3
More informationHow to... Manage redundancies. A quick and easy reference guide on the basics
How to... Manage redundancies A quick and easy reference guide on the basics 1 Top tips on making redundancies 1. Identify whether a redundancy situation exists 2. Consider alternatives don't conclude
More informationEUROCITIES position on the European Commission legislative proposal on public procurement
EUROCITIES position on the European Commission legislative proposal on public procurement EUROCITIES EUROCITIES is the political platform for major European cities towards the EU institutions. We network
More informationEmployment Law Update. Jane Klauber
Employment Law Update Jane Klauber Family Rights 30 June 2014. Flexible working regime extended to all employees with 26 weeks service 1 October 2014 right to time off to attend 2 ante natal appointments
More informationImplementing Change (Redundancy & Restructures) Policy
Implementing Change (Redundancy & Restructures) Policy Further advice and guidance on this policy can be obtained from your HR Business Partner or the HR Helpdesk hrsupport@academiesenterprisetrust.org
More informationReorganisation and Redundancy Policy and Procedure. Approved by: Trustees
Reorganisation and Redundancy Policy and Procedure Approved by: Trustees Date: October 2017 Reorganisation and Redundancy Policy 1. Introduction 1.1 The Trust is committed to ensuring its workforce operates
More informationRedundancy Policy. "Where the employer has ceased, or intends to cease, to carry on the business for the
Redundancy Policy POLICY STATEMENT It is the College s policy to aim to provide security of employment through its planning of staffing needs and thus avoid making compulsory redundancies amongst its employees
More informationCODE OF PRACTICE ON WORKFORCE MATTERS IN PUBLIC SECTOR SERVICE CONTRACTS
CODE OF PRACTICE ON WORKFORCE MATTERS IN PUBLIC SECTOR SERVICE CONTRACTS 1. This document sets out an approach to workforce matters in public sector service contracts which involve a transfer of staff
More informationAn overview of Employment Law in England & Wales. April Please contact our Company Commercial department for further information
An overview of Employment Law in England & Wales April 2017 Please contact our Company Commercial department for further information An overview of Employment Law in England & Wales 1 Contents Page 1)
More informationRedundancy Policy 01 September 2016
Redundancy Policy 01 September 2016 Version Control Current version Previous version 01 Sep 2016 21 Apr 2016 21 Apr 2016 14 Apr 2016 Summary of changes made The payment for compensation for loss of hours
More informationCfBT Schools Trust Trade Union Recognition and Procedural Agreement
Trade Union Recognition and Procedural Agreement Final Agreed CST Trade Union Recognition Agreement Mar 16 TRADE UNION RECOGNITION AND PROCEDURAL AGREEMENT Section Contents Page 1 Definition of Terms 3
More informationSUMMARY OF: FSA Discussion Paper 06/05. FSA Confirmation of Industry Guidance
SUMMARY OF: FSA Discussion Paper 06/05 FSA Confirmation of Industry Guidance February 2007 Page 2 Summary of: FSA Discussion Paper 06/05 FSA Confirmation of Industry Guidance Introduction The move towards
More informationDIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/958 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
9.7.2018 Official Journal of the European Union L 173/25 DIRECTIVE (EU) 2018/958 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 28 June 2018 on a proportionality test before adoption of new regulation
More informationEmployment status. Employment and HR 101. Louise McCartney 11 November Objectives. Key concepts around employment status
STATUS Employment and HR 101 Louise McCartney 11 November 2016 Objectives Key concepts around employment status To acquire a basic understanding of the employment law landscape and responsibilities of
More informationStaff Whistleblowing Policy
Staff Whistleblowing Policy Policy: Whistleblowing Effective Date: November 2014 Revision Number : 4.0 Revised: January 2017 Reviewable: As required Author: Educate HR/Business Manager Revision History
More informationEmployment law newsletter
www.parissmith.co.uk Employment law newsletter 1. Pensions - auto-enrolment minimum contribution timetable is extended The Government has announced that the auto-enrolment minimum contribution timetable
More informationInternational Private M&A Some U.K. Labor and Employment Law Issues. Charles Wynn-Evans
International Private M&A Some U.K. Labor and Employment Law Issues A Briefing by Dechert LLP in cooperation with the Association of Corporate Counsel Dechert LLP 30 Rockefeller Center New York, NY 10112
More informationAGENDA ITEM: 5(c) Management of Change Policy and Procedure
AGENDA ITEM: 5(c) Management of Change Policy and Procedure Review Date: September 2006 Reviewed by: Head of Employment Services 1. Introduction & Policy Statement The Trust aims to provide job security
More informationManaging the workforce. Cutting costs and restructuring
Managing the workforce Cutting costs and restructuring Introduction Schools are having to consider ways in which to manage the workforce in order to reduce overheads. As a school's biggest regular outgoing,
More informationREDUNDANCY AND RESTRUCTURING POLICY AND PROCEDURE
REDUNDANCY AND RESTRUCTURING POLICY AND PROCEDURE 1. Purpose 1.1 The need to make changes to the shape of the workforce and the numbers employed can arise for a range of reasons which can include technology,
More informationEUROPEAN UNION (Withdrawal) BILL AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SCOTLAND
EUROPEAN UNION (Withdrawal) BILL AND IMPLICATIONS FOR SCOTLAND This is a submission by Open Scotland to the Scottish Parliament s Finance and Constitution Committee in regards to the call for evidence
More informationStatutory Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures What s All the Fuss About?
October 2004 Statutory Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures What s All the Fuss About? The Employment Act 2002 ( EA ) established a framework for promoting the resolution of employment disputes in the
More information