Risk Management Strategy Review. Deloitte recommendations and Implementation Plan
|
|
- Hope Ball
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Risk Management Strategy Review Deloitte recommendations and Implementation Plan 1. Purpose 1.1. This paper provides the results of the annual review of the current Risk Management Strategy. The results of the review establish a benchmark from which CHUFT can measure risk maturity, and set a target for 2014/ Background 2.1. The Trust Board reviewed and approved version 9, of the Risk Management Strategy in March, The strategy sets out the requirement for a formal evaluation of the implementation of the Risk Management Strategy annually. 3. Review Methodology and Results 3.1. In order to fully review the Risk Management Strategy Implementation Plan consistently on an annual basis the Quality Hub has adopted a risk management maturity assessment based on a modified version of the HM Treasury Risk Management Assessment Framework. This self-assessment framework measures the extent to which good risk management policies are being practised across an organisation and is derived from the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) excellence model It covers seven core areas with each category having an individual assessment that is then aggregated up to provide an overall rating for the Trust. 1.Risk leadership 2.Risk strategy and policies 3.People 4.Partnerships 5.Risk management process 6.Risk handling 7.Outcomes Category 4. Category and Weighting 4.1. In order to determine the Trust s Overall Risk Maturity Rating, weightings have been applied to categories (weights 1-5) indicating level of importance to the Trusts (5 being very important and 1 less so). Weightings applied to the Trust s core areas are: Category Weightings(w) Risk leadership 4 Risk strategy and policies 3 People 3 Partnerships 2 Risk management process 2 Risk handling 3 1
2 Outcomes A baseline self-assessment using this methodology was undertaken in March (year 1) prior to version 9 of the Risk Management Strategy being approved. Category Weightings x Assessed Level (AL) Score Risk leadership Risk strategy and policies People Partnerships Risk management process Risk handling Outcomes Total Score Overall Assessment Levels / Rating 5.1 The overall Risk Maturity Matrix Score for the Trust was 33/110. The overall Risk Maturity Matrix Score for the Trust was 33/110. This translated to an overall risk maturity rating of Level 2: Approaches for addressing risks are being developed and action plan for implementation being devised Levels Score Descriptor The organisation has an awareness and understanding of risk management Approaches for addressing risks are being developed and action plan for implementation being devised Risk management applied consistently and thoroughly across the organisation The organisation is proactive in driving, and maintaining the embedding of risk management and integration in all areas of the organisation The organisation sustains risk capability, organisational & business resilience and commitment to excellence in risk management, leaders regarded as exemplars 5.2 The following section describes in detail the assessment and implementation plan for CHUFT in 2014/15. The plan is constructed in a tabular format with levels of assessment, core weighting scores, summary evidence that is informed by the February, 2014 Deloitte risk report (denoted in red), additional summary evidence has been provided by the quality hub. 2
3 The plan has been designed to improve the CHUFT risk maturity from level 2 in 2013/14, to level 3 in 2014/15. 3
4 6. Risk Maturity Detailed Assessment and Implementation Plan (inclusive of Deloitte actions) A. Leadership Level 1 Awareness & understanding Level 2 Implementation planned & in progress Level 3 Implementation in all key areas Level 4 Embedding and improving Level 5 Excellent capability established Top management are aware of need to manage uncertainty and risk and have made resources available to improve Executive Directors and Non-Executives take the lead to ensure approaches for addressing risk are being developed and implemented Executive Directors act as role models to apply risk management consistently and thoroughly across the organisation Executive Directors are proactive in driving and maintaining the embedding and integration of risk management; in setting criteria and arrangements for risk management and in providing top down commitment to well managed risk taking to support and encourage innovation and the seizing of opportunities Executive Directors reenforce and sustain risk capability, organisational & business resilience and commitment to excellence. Leaders regarded as exemplars Leadership Self Assessment Score Level 1 4
5 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 With regard to the Risk Management Strategy ensure: suggested improvements are implemented to develop a comprehensive risk management strategy that is fit for purpose; that the draft is subject to widespread clinical and operational consultation prior to Board ratification and approval; and the document and the approach to risk escalation throughout the organisation is communicated to all staff. Ensure that the proposed Quality Impact Assessment process for CIP schemes is: developed in conjunction with clinical teams; Includes a requirement for clinical lead sign off for each quality impact assessment; and includes reference to quality indicators to allow tracking post implementation. Ensure communications regarding risks to the organisation are delivered effectively through a variety of platforms to ensure full understanding by all staff groups. Ensure improved communications to staff regarding changes that have been made as a result of their concerns, for example using You said, We did campaigns Review the scope for greater executive participation in operational sub-committees and for more scrutiny of papers at EMT meetings to ensure that there is appropriate Executive oversight prior to consideration of issues at the assurance committees. Implement suggested improvements to ensure that BAF is a useful tool and gives value to the Board. Version 9, of the Risk Management Strategy to be Board approved in March, 2014 New Corporate Risk Register to be developed maintained by the Executive Team and presented at each board subcommittee meeting. Board Assurance Framework to be designed and populated with 2014 strategic objectives/priorities. Board to review content and consider assurances from its sub-committees prior to amending risk rating Strategy to be launched and communicated to all staff and stakeholders 2014/15 Governance structure to be implemented Annual review of risk maturity to be presented to Risk and Assurance Committee Language of risk to be included as a part of the organisational dictionary Implement suggested improvements to ensure that the CRR is a useful tool and gives value to the Board. Senior manager do not know how to apply risk systems to identify or keep their respective risks current 5
6 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 Risk not used to support innovative service developments Accountability arrangements unclear Risk not proactively identified via horizon scanning 6
7 B. Risk Strategy and Policies Level 1 Awareness & understanding Level 2 Implementation planned & in progress Level 3 Implementation in all key areas Level 4 Embedding and improving Level 5 Excellent capability established The need for a risk strategy and related policies has been identified and accepted A risk management strategy & policies have been drawn up and communicated and being acted upon Risk strategy & policies are communicated effectively and made to work through a framework of processes Risk strategy & policies are communicated effectively and are an inherent feature of department policies and processes Risk management aspects of strategy and policy, making help to dive the risk agenda and are reviewed and improved, role model stratus Risk Strategy and Policies Self Assessment Score 2 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 Develop a risk appetite statement and then align expected behaviours to manage risk within the boundaries set by the appetite statement. Current risk strategy (Version, 8) is dated and does not reflect organisational structure or roles and responsibilities. Horizon scanning, treatment, risk profile, benchmarking. Link to risk domains or risk treatment not defined Risk Appetite statement to be written and communicated to all relevant staff. Implement Risk Management Strategy Version 9, Strategy not supported by plan for improvement or assessment 7
8 C. People Level 1 Awareness & understanding Level 2 Implementation planned & in progress Level 3 Implementation in all key areas Level 4 Embedding and improving Level 5 Excellent capability established Key people are aware of the need to assess and manage risks and they understand risk concepts and principles Suitable guidance is available and a training programme has been implemented to develop risk capability A core group of people have the skills & knowledge to manage risk effectively People are encouraged and supported to be innovative and are generally empowered to take well-managed risks. Most people have relevant skills & knowledge to manage risks effectively and regular training etc. is available for people to enhance their risk skills and fill any gaps All staff are empowered to be responsible for risk management and see it as an inherent part of the Divisional / Directorate business. They have a good record of innovation and well managed risk taking People Self Assessment Score 2 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Conduct risk management training for all current Board members, focusing on the NHS environment and Trust context. The training should focus on an effective risk management process with emphasis on risk treatment, how to make decisions about risk and using risk appetite. Implementation Plan Requirements All risk training to be evaluated, linked to appraisal system and made mandatory at induction Levels of risk training to reflect role and responsibilities of individuals and their respective banding 8
9 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Where necessary, design and implement more comprehensive and customised risk management training to meet the requirements of individual NEDs. Consider the need for a wider NED skill set and capability review to identify additional development requirements for NEDs. Determine the most appropriate Executive Director to be responsible for non-clinical risk management, to include due consideration of the benefits of combining risk management of clinical and non-clinical risks into a single portfolio. Proactively encourage an increase in uptake of training for clinical staff as incident investigators to ensure a wider and more appropriate resource pool for allocation of incidents. Implementation Plan Requirements Board development plan to consider risk management training Board risk workshop organised for March, 2014 Access to advice and support to create and maintain risk culture to be the remit of the quality hub. Guidance to be created and developed by the quality hub, on an integrated risk management toolkit Allocation/delegated overall responsibilities for Risk and Safety to agreed and reflected in risk management strategy, version, Review the training provision and content to all grades of staff in line with the revised Risk Management Strategy. Determine the most appropriate Executive Director to be responsible for non-clinical risk management, to include due consideration of the benefits of combining risk management of clinical and non-clinical risks into a single portfolio. Risk culture not evident, risk seen as bad news and failure Staff not confident risks will be treated or escalated in a timely fashion Risks are in silos, not integrated, linked or aligned to other HR issues. 9
10 D. Partnerships Level 1 Awareness & understanding Level 2 Implementation planned & in progress Level 3 Implementation in all key areas Level 4 Embedding and improving Level 5 Excellent capability established Key people are aware of areas of potential risk with partnerships and understand the need to agree approaches to manage these risks Approaches for addressing risk with partners are being developed and implemented Risk with partners is managed consistently for key areas and across organisational boundaries Robust risk management arrangements have been established. The most suitable: partnership arrangement (PFI, arms length etc.); partners; suppliers etc are selected in full knowledge of the risks, risk management capability & compatibility Excellent arrangements in place to identify and manage risks with all partners and to monitor and improve performance. Organisation regarded as a role model Partnerships Self Assessment Score 1 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 No common agreement (risk register, log, shared risk or risk information exchange with partners. No clarity about partnership risk accountability/responsibility identification and treatment. No agreement for access to risk information Negotiate and agree formal process with partners for risk and risk management arrangements.subject to CEO/Board approval 10
11 E. Risk Management Processes Level 1 Awareness & understanding Level 2 Implementation planned & in progress Level 3 Implementation in all key areas Level 4 Embedding and improving Level 5 Excellent capability established Some stand-alone risk processes have been identified Recommended risk management processes are being developed Risk management processes implemented in key areas. Risk capability self - assessment tools used in some areas Risk management is an integral part of the organisation s core processes (policy, planning, delivery etc.) and data are collected to monitor and improve risk management performance Management of risk & uncertainty is an integrated part of all business processes. Best practice approaches are used and developed. Selected as a benchmark site by other organisations Risk Management Processes Self Assessment Score 2 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 Ensure the accountability framework includes a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the triumvirate leadership teams in relation to risk management. Ensure the Divisional Directors and their leadership teams have access to appropriate professional development support/training in relation to risk management and more Implementation plan to achieve level 3 for 2014/15 in place and agreed Risk data capture system (Datix) to be re-mapped against required data fields: Cause, Effect and Impact Risk Domains CQC Standards 11
12 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 generally. Consider the function and role of the Quality Hub, and the support to the divisions in conjunction with the Divisional Directors. Continue with the plans to introduce a robust and consistent performance management framework that enables the clinical divisions to operate on an earned autonomy basis, which is supported by the Executive Directors. Introduce a programme of education at the Ward, Service and Divisional level aimed at improving awareness around the recording of appropriate risks on the Risk Register. Ensure incidents and complaints are jointly analysed with the ability to identify local areas of concern through the process. Service, Divisional, and Corporate Risk Register Board Assurance Framework Integrated risk, safety Incidents and complaint reports to be generated from Datix and presented to relevant board subcommittee and stakeholders Validity, reliability and evidence for risk control/mitigation will be scrutinised by the relevant board sub-committee for assurance All board sub-committees will close with a request for any items for the risk register Audit and re-define use of LEAP process, focussing on SMART action planning. Introduce complaint and incident rates and benchmarking data to the suite of divisional management information. Expand the programme of internal inspections to ensure that wards are reviewed using the CQC essential standards. Introduce a list of minimum requirements for committee papers to comply with, including consideration of associated risks, and a clear and concise overview of the key issues focussing on providing assurance rather than operational detail. This should include a standardised cover sheet. Ensure incidents and complaints are jointly analysed with the ability to identify themes, trends and local areas of concern 12
13 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 through the process. Reconsider the criteria for the completion of LEAPs to ensure that they are meaningful and that staff are able to track implementation and audit to ensure embedded in practice. Also endeavour to look at the changes required for themes The Internal Audit forward plan should be developed to incorporate a robust programme around quality governance including review of the complaints and incidents handling processes rather than individual incidents where appropriate. Risk not routinely identified or recorded in: Safety and Compliance Project Management Operational Management Performance Management Business Planning Spending Review Risk not seen as good management practice Risk process does not demonstrate: Transparency Engagement (internal or external) Consistant activities Validity and reliability of evidence for risk control/mitigation Measurement of organisational risk performance/maturity not annually appraised. Business continuity risks not seen on risk registers 13
14 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 Risk escalation process not clear or evidenced Risk identification/description poorly defined F. Risk Handling Level 1 Awareness & understanding Level 2 Implementation planned & in progress Level 3 Implementation in all key areas Level 4 Embedding and improving Level 5 Excellent capability established No clear evidence that risk management is being effective Limited evidence that risk management is being effective in at least most relevant areas Clear evidence that risk management is being effective in all relevant areas Clear evidence that risks are being handled very effectively in all areas Risk Handling Self Assessment Score 2 Very clear evidence of excellent risk handling in all areas and that improvement is being pursued Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 Reassess whether the responsibilities of the Quality and Patient Safety Committee are appropriate and manageable within the time available with a view to considering the need to reassign responsibility for performance to another Board Committee. Review the adequacy of the administrative support to the committees to ensure that this is not adversely impacting on the Implement 2014, governance arrangements Provide learning and sharing risk information to comms dept. for dissemination across the trust Quality hub to assist divisions in creating KPI matrix for risk 14
15 Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 ability of members to deliver on agreed actions. Amend the Board agenda so that each committee chair provides a brief written and verbal summary of the key issues arising from the most recent committee meeting, specifically which matters are being escalated for the Board s attention and which have been referred to other committees. management Quality hub to assist divisions in creating risk registers and develop processes for onward reporting/escalation Consider organising the agenda so that any points for escalation are presented just prior to the relevant agenda item. For example, report from QPSC is reported immediately prior to quality agenda rather than at the end of the meeting. Provide regular updates to the Audit and Risk Committee on the status and use of Risk Registers at the Ward, Service and Divisional level to include a set of KPIs for the Risk Register. Ensure that all ward, departmental and service governance meetings are supported to meet on a monthly or bi-monthly basis and that core agenda items are discussed. Little evidence of risks being reduced or controlled Risk not being used as an enabler or decision making tool Risk outcomes not being utilised as a vehicle for learning and sharing across the organisation 15
16 G. Outcomes Level 1 Awareness & understanding Level 2 Implementation planned & in progress Level 3 Implementation in all key areas Level 4 Embedding and improving Level 5 Excellent capability established No clear evidence of improved outcomes Limited evidence of improved outcome performance consistent with improved risk management Clear evidence of significant improvements in outcome performance demonstrated by measures including, where relevant, stakeholders perceptions Clear evidence of very significantly improved delivery of outcomes and showing positive and sustained improvement Outcomes Self Assessment Score 1 Excellent evidence of markedly improved delivery of outcomes which compares favourably with other organisations employing best practice Audit Commentary - Summary Evidence Implementation Plan Requirements 2014/15 No evidence of risk being used for: Better public services Sustained improvements Fewer negative, more positive press reports on delivery Achievements of business/strategic objectives Project(s) success Improved value for money Delivery within budget Effective control of fraud Increased Public confidence Attract positive comments (staff, partners, stakeholders) Share risk management strategy, version 9, 2014 with stakeholders Implement 2014/15 risk plan Enter CHUFT for national ALARM award for risk management 16
17 9. Recommendations 9.1 The Committee is asked to note and discuss the content of this report. Kevin Street Associate Director of Governance (interim) 17
Risk Management and Assurance Strategy
Risk Management and Assurance Strategy Version 5.0 Policy number ULHT-MD-GOV-RM-STRAT Document author(s) Head of 2021 Programme Contributor(s) Approved by Policy Approval Group Date approved Date Published
More informationBoard Assurance and Escalation Framework
Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (LPFT) Board Assurance and Escalation Framework DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL Document Type and Title: Policy No 5a. with effect from 2/11/15 (former corporate
More informationBOARD ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK
BOARD ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK PURPOSE OF THE BOARD ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK The Board Assurance Framework (BAF) provides assurance to the Cwm Taf University Health Board on the delivery of its core purpose Cwm
More informationGOVERNANCE SMART objectives / SUHFT board development programme
GOVERNANCE SMART objectives / SUHFT board development programme Specific objective Measurable Success Actions required Relevance / Outcome Owner Time Documented set of Trust Board objectives will be in
More informationRisk Management Implementation Plan
41 07 Management Author: Dr Kevin Street; Interim Chief Officer Date: 20 November 2015 Version: 1 Sponsoring Executive Director: Rhiannon Beaumont-Wood Who will present: Kevin Street Date of Board / Committee
More informationBOARD OF DIRECTORS: 1 st June 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5.1 SUBJECT: Performance Management & Accountability Framework Rebecca Brown Chief Operating Officer
BOARD OF DIRECTORS: 1 st June 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5.1 SUBJECT: RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR: AUTHOR: Performance Management & Accountability Framework Rebecca Brown Chief Operating Officer Rebecca Brown Chief Operating
More informationRisk Management Strategy
Risk Management Strategy 2017-2019 Created by: Role Name Title Author / Editor Kevin McMahon Head of Risk Management & Resilience Lead Executive Margo McGurk Director of Finance & Performance Approved
More informationThe Kirkup report. Governance Project Mary Aubrey, Director of Governance May 2015
The Kirkup report Governance Project Mary Aubrey, Director of Governance May 2015 The Governance Project group The Governance Project group Communication plan PLANNING PHASE Meetings held with the Heads
More informationASSURANCE FRAMEWORK. A framework to assure the Board that it is delivering the best possible service for its citizens SEPTEMBER 2010.
ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK A framework to assure the Board that it is delivering the best possible service for its citizens SEPTEMBER 2010 V3 Draft 1 SECTION NO. ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3
More informationIdentifies the risk management structure, roles, responsibilities and authority of staff, committees and groups with responsibility for risk
Title Description of document The sets out the process by which the Trust identifies, manages, reduces and mitigates risks to achieving the organisational objectives. It sets out the framework required
More informationRevisions to the governance and committee structures will be updated in line with approvals at the December Trust Board.
REPORT TO THE TRUST BOARD - 19 th DECEMBER 2013 Title Board Assurance and Escalation Framework N Executive summary The Board Assurance and Escalation Framework (BAEF) describes the Trust s quality governance
More informationActive Essex Risk Management Strategy
Active Essex Risk Management Strategy 2017-2021 November 2017 Contents 1. Policy Statement 2. Statement of Commitment 3. Risk Management Framework 4. Risk Appetite 5. Risk Maturity 6. Risk Management Levels
More informationResponse to Hard Truths - Action Plan Update Quarter 4 (March 26 th 2014)
Response to Hard Truths Action Plan Update Quarter 4 (March 26 th 204). Prevent problems person (a) Culture and Patient Respond to staff survey results and develop an action plan as required Respond to
More informationInternal Audit Report Corporate Governance and Risk Management
Audit Committee, 13 March 2013 Internal Audit Report Corporate Governance and Risk Management Executive summary and recommendations Introduction Mazars has undertaken a review of the arrangements for corporate
More informationMeeting Date 15 March 2018 Agenda Item 2b
Meeting Date 15 March 2018 Agenda Item 2b Report Title Stocktake Report Author Pam Wenger, Report Sponsor Pam Wenger, Presented by Pam Wenger, Freedom of Open Information Purpose of the Report The purpose
More informationOpen Information Purpose of the Report
Meeting Date 15 March 2018 Agenda Item 2c Report Title Financial Governance Review Report Author Liz Stauber, Committee Services Manager Report Sponsor Pam Wenger, Director of Corporate Governance Presented
More informationHours of Work: 37.5 hours per week (part time hours negotiable)
JOB DESCRIPTION Post Title: Head of Performance Assurance Location: NHS Oldham CCG Headquarters (Ellen House) Salary/Grade: Band 8c Hours of Work: 37.5 hours per week (part time hours negotiable) Type
More informationANNUAL GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 2016/17 AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE. 28 March Report by Chief Executive
ANNUAL GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 2016/17 Report by Chief Executive AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE 28 March 2017 1 PURPOSE AND SUMMARY 1.1 This report proposes that the Audit and Risk Committee considers and approves
More informationFuture-Focused Finance Accreditation
Future-Focused Finance Accreditation This accreditation system is designed to allow the NHS Finance Leadership Council (FLC) to give due recognition to those NHS organisations that have the very best finance
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
Agenda Item No: 15 RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY PURPOSE: The Risk Management Strategy has been updated to reflect the revised approach to the Corporate Risk Register and Board Assurance Framework and to reflect
More informationWell Led Governance Review
Preparing Governors for the : Well Led Governance Review Julie Dawes - Interim Trust Secretary Lindsay Winterton Interim Joint Membership and Governance Manager Tuesday 7 October 2014 Objectives of today
More informationExternally Facilitated Board Effectiveness Review
Draft issued: 16 March 2017 2 nd Draft issued: 20 March 2017 Final issued: 20 March 2017 CONTENT Page No. Section 1 Background 1 Section 2 Scope, Objectives and Overall Findings 1-2 Section 3 Audit Approach
More informationFor: Information Assurance Discussion and input Decision/approval. Ellen Bull, Deputy Director of Quality Author Contact Details: 3531
Trust Board Item: 15 Date: 07/02/2018 Purpose of the Report: Enclosure: K To request ratification from the Trust Board of Directors on the. which was discussed, refined and approved at the Risk Management
More informationTRUST GOVERNANCE POLICY (formerly referenced as the CMFT Governance Strategy) - UPDATED NOVEMBER
Review Circulation Application Ratification Originator or modifier Supersedes Title CENTRAL MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST TRUST GOVERNANCE POLICY (formerly referenced as the CMFT
More informationJob description and person specification
Job description and person specification Position Job title Head of Genomics Unit Directorate Finance, Commercial and Specialised Commissioning Pay band AFC Band 9 Responsible to Director of Strategy and
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT POLICY
RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY Clinical Governance & Risk Management Department Warning Document uncontrolled when printed Policy Reference: RM 2.0 Date of Issue: TBC Prepared by: Risk Management Short Life Date
More informationCustomer Support Group (CSG) Invoicing and Monitoring Arrangements. April 2016
Internal Audit Customer Support Group (CSG) Invoicing and Monitoring Arrangements April 2016 Distributed to: Chief Operating Officer Commercial Director Director of Resources Head of Finance Partnership
More informationCARBON REDUCTION AND SUSTAINABILITY POLICY
CARBON REDUCTION AND SUSTAINABILITY POLICY Version: 4 Ratified by: Senior Managers Operational Group Date ratified: March 2016 Title of originator/author: Sustainability and Carbon Reduction Lead Title
More informationTRUST BOARD 26 MAY 2011 ANNUAL REVIEW OF BOARD COMMITTEES 2010/2011
TRUST BOARD 26 MAY 2011 ANNUAL REVIEW OF BOARD COMMITTEES 2010/2011 D Summary The annual reviews of the Board s sub committees took place during April and May 2011. The Trust s standard terms of reference
More informationBoard Self-Assessment: Results Report
Board Self-Assessment: Results Report Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Summary of Board Responses... 2 3. Other evidence... 2 4. Proposed Action Plan for 2016/17... 7 5. Conclusion... 8 Amber- Partially
More informationLONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
1. INTRODUCTION LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 1.1 As with all Local Authorities, the council operates through a governance framework. This is an inter-related system that brings
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2015-2020 2016 Amendments This is a five-year strategy that is subject to annual review by the Board of Directors. The first review took place on 29 November 2016. At this time
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Version 2.0 Page 1 of 9 OCTOBER 2013 POLICY DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL CERTIFICATE TITLE Title: Risk Management Strategy Version: 2.0 SUPERSEDES Supersedes: Risk Management Strategy
More informationJob Description Assistant HR Business Partner Document Owner: Head of Human Resources & Organisational Development
Job Description Version No Revision Date Reason for Revision 004 3 June 2016 Company wide restructure Directorate: Corporate Services Division Human Resources Reports To: Grade: Band E Job Evaluation Number
More informationRisk Register. Date 22/11/2013 Risk Status. Risk Area. Open. Restructure
Risk Register Date Risk Status Risk Area Open Restructure Page 2 of 19 891 Failure to achieve Cause, Effect and Risk Source: operational service Causes: delivery from - Realignment of services to provide
More informationJob description and person specification
Job description and person specification Position Job title Knowledge Management Facilitator Directorate Operations and Information Pay band AFC Band 8a Responsible to NHS RightCare Knowledge Management
More informationOUR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY
OUR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT JOURNEY NORTHAMPTONSHIRE HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST #wearenhft OUR TRUST An Foundation Trust since 2009 A diverse range of community and mental health services for adults
More informationDraft Internal Audit Plan 2012/13 Audit Committee (September 2012) Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Draft Internal Audit Plan 2012/13 (September 2012) Contents 1. Introduction 2. Risk Assessment 3. Internal Audit Plan Appendix A: 3 Year Indicative Plan 1 1. Introduction MIAA s approach to planning focuses
More informationNHS DORSET CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY MEETING ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK UPDATE 2018/2019
NHS DORSET CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY MEETING ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK UPDATE 2018/2019 Date of the meeting 14/11/2018 Author Sponsoring Board member Purpose of Report Recommendation
More informationRisk Management Strategy
High Value Health Care Risk Management Strategy (Reference No. GR21 0914) Version: Version 4, September 2014 Version Superseded: Version 3, March 2012 Ratified by: Date ratified: 11 th November 2014 Designation
More informationCancer Programme Manager. Full time (37.5 hours per week)
Job title Salary Hours Base Accountable to Cancer Programme Manager 33,222 to 59,964 (dependent on experience) Full time (37.5 hours per week) Cambridge Director of Transformation ABOUT EASTERN AHSN The
More informationIssues Management Policy and process
Issues Management Policy and process Version: V1.0 Ratified: Lewisham Risk Management Group Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/individual; Victoria Medhurst Senior Management Team
More informationBoard Assurance Framework Process and Standing Operating Procedure
SH NCP 59 Board Assurance Framework Process and Standing Operating Procedure Summary: Keywords Target Audience: This document describes the integrated governance and internal controls processes within
More informationJob description and person specification
Job description and person specification Position Job title Delivery Field Work Support Directorate Operations & Information Pay band AFC Band 8a Responsible to Delivery Partner(s) in local geography Salary
More informationRole Profile. Role Details. Grade 4 Business unit. Date produced or updated March 2017
Role Profile Role Details Role Title Risk Officer Permanent Grade Business unit Risk Reporting to Head of Risk Date produced or updated March 2017 Purpose of Role To support the Head of Risk and Risk Director
More informationJOB DESCRIPTION 1. GENERAL INFORMATION. Project Manager Pathway Group specific
JOB DECRIPTION 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Job Title: Grade: alary: Hours: Contract: Terms & Conditions: Hosted by: Responsible to: Accountable to: Responsible for: Project Manager Pathway Group specific 8b
More informationDirector of Patient Experience and Stakeholder Management
HAMPSHIRE PARTNERSHIP NHS FOUNDATION TRUST Director of Patient Experience and Stakeholder Management JOB DESCRIPTION Job Title: Band: Location Reports to: Accountable to: Hours Director of Patient Experience
More informationBoard Assurance Framework
Board Assurance Framework 2018 19 First draft May 2018 Version 5 Board Development Meeting 22.02.2018 Trust Management Group 04.04.2018 02.05.2018 Audit Committee 10.04.2018 Trust Board 24.05.2018 Quality
More informationFreedom to Speak Report Update Self Assessment Review 1 October 2018
Freedom to Speak Report Update Self Assessment Review 1 October 2018 Safe & Effective Kind & Caring Exceeding Expectation Agenda Item No: 11.6 The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust Trust Board Report Meeting
More informationNOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED. HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland. Inspection Framework. Version 1.0 (September 2014)
HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland Inspection Framework Version 1.0 (September 2014) Improving Policing across Scotland Introduction I am pleased to introduce the new HMICS Inspection Framework.
More informationScheme of Delegation. Why does it matter? There are three core functions of effective governance:
Scheme of Delegation Why does it matter? There are three core functions of effective governance: 1. Ensuring clarity of vision, ethos and strategic direction. 2. Holding the executive to account for the
More informationTRUST-WIDE NON-CLINICAL POLICY DOCUMENT. Date Ratified: February 2015 Next Review Date (by): Interim Review August 2017 Version Number: 2015 Version 1
TRUST-WIDE NON-CLINICAL POLICY DOCUMENT Policy Number: Scope of this Document: Recommending Committee: Appproving Committee: SA01 All Staff Policy Group Executive Committee Date Ratified: February 2015
More informationStructured Assessment Public Health Wales NHS Trust
December 2012 Structured Assessment Public Health Wales NHS Trust Summary of findings Document reference: 631A2012 Gabrielle Smith, Tracy Veale, Anthony Ford and Matthew Coe Structured Assessment Year
More informationCOMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY
COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY 2016-2019 Introduction and purpose This strategy details how communications will support the delivery of shaping the future of urgent & emergency care (EEAST strategy 2016-21).
More informationQuality Impact Assessment Procedure. July 2012
Quality Impact Assessment Procedure July 2012 1 Document name Quality Impact Assessment Procedure Version 3.0 Document author (name/title) Karen Warner Compliance lead (name/title) Mark Turner, Assurance
More informationJOB DESCRIPTION. Head of Quality and Compliance. Director of Quality and Safety ORGANISATIONAL CONTEXT
JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: DEPARTMENT: GRADE: REPORTS TO: Head of Quality and Compliance Quality and Safety 8b Director of Quality and Safety ORGANISATIONAL CONTEXT The Medical Director and Director of
More informationSOMERSET PARTNERSHIP NHS FOUNDATION TRUST STRENGTHENING GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS. Report to the Trust Board 24 May 2016
R SOMERSET PARTNERSHIP NHS FOUNDATION TRUST STRENGTHENING GOVERNANCE ARRANGEMENTS Report to the Trust Board 24 May 2016 Sponsoring Director: Author: Purpose of the report: Key Issues and Recommendations:
More informationCode of Corporate Governance
Code of Corporate Governance 1 FOREWORD From the Chairman of the General Purposes Committee I am pleased to endorse this Code of Corporate Governance, which sets out the commitment of Cambridgeshire County
More informationINFECTION PREVENTION CONTROL DOMAIN 4 LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
INFECTION PREVENTION CONTROL DOMAIN 4 LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT DOMAIN 4 LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT Use the rating scale below to help you assess yourself against the competency statement. LD SD WD NA -
More informationMarketing and Social Media Executive Summary
Appendix D CODA Audit Reports Completed and Presented to CODA Assurance, Audit and Risk Committee Marketing and Social Media Executive Summary 1 Introduction Internal Audit has recently completed an audit
More informationThe Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Aggregating Data and Learning from Incidents, Complaints and Claims Policy
The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aggregating Data and Learning from Incidents, Complaints and Claims Policy Version no. 2.1 Effective from: 2 nd October 2012 Expiry date: 31 st October
More informationCorporate Governance Statement 2016/17
Corporate Governance Statement 2016/17 The Trust is required to complete its Corporate Governance self-assessment and make its associated statement by 30 June 2017. From July 2017, NHSi will contact a
More informationJOB DESCRIPTION. Manager Service Management Technical Systems & Proposed band. Job family
Job title Job family Manager Service Management Technical Systems & Proposed Delivery band E Job purpose The Manager, Service Management is responsible for leading a functional team in one of the specialist
More informationItem Name of. Finance. Committee. Dr John. many areas as 2017/18. forward. follows: The Trust. Additionally. care.
Item 12.1 Summary Exception Report off the Finance e meeting minutes for May 2018 EXCEPTION REPORTS Name of Chair of Senior Officer Supporting Date s Held Finance Dr John Lander, Non Executive Director
More informationJob description and person specification
Job description and person specification Job title Business Process Lead - NHS RightCare System Programme Management& Governance Position Directorate Midlands & East Region Pay band AFC Band 8c Responsible
More information1.1 Contributes to the Trust s Organisational Development strategy to improve overall organisational performance and effectiveness
JOB TITLE: OD Practitioner BAND: AFC 7 BASE: RESPONSIBLE TO: ACCOUNTABLE TO: XX OD Consultant (OD Lead) Director of OD and L&D JOB SUMMARY The Organisational Development Practitioner is responsible for
More informationBOARD OF DIRECTORS TERMS OF REFERENCE OF SUB-COMMITTEES
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TERMS OF REFERENCE OF SUB-COMMITTEES January 2011 Page 1 of 19 AUDIT, RISK AND ASSURANCE COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE STRUCTURE AND RELATIONSHIPS 1. CONSTITUTION The Audit, Risk & Assurance
More informationSUSTAINABLE PROCUREMENT POLICY
Ref No: SPP/1b SUSTAINABLE PROCUREMENT POLICY Version: Ratified by: Title of originator/author: Title of responsible committee/individual: SECTION 1 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Date issued: May 2017 Review
More informationCLINICAL & PROFESSIONAL SUPERVISION POLICY (replacing 033/Workforce)
CLINICAL & PROFESSIONAL SUPERVISION POLICY (replacing 033/Workforce) POLICY NUMBER 051/Workforce POLICY VERSION 1 RATIFYING COMMITTEE HR Policy Review Group DATE RATIFIED December 2010 NEXT REVIEW DATE
More informationGOVERNANCE STRATEGY October 2013
GOVERNANCE STRATEGY October 2013 1. Introduction 1.1. The Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust believes that the role of the governing body is pivotal to the success of the Trust.
More informationTrust Board Meeting. 2 July 2015
Trust Board Meeting 2 July Paper Reference: TB(15-16) 99 Report Title: Executive Summary: Action Required: Link to Strategic Objectives: Risks: Quality Impact: Resource Implications: Legal/Regulatory Implications:
More informationAt Alternative Futures Group we define the quality of our services through
Defining Quality in Alternative Futures Group The quality of services starts from what matters most to the people using them. A quality service also pays close attention to areas which may be invisible
More informationHUMAN RESOURCES POLICY Draft 3
1.0 INTRODUCTION HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY Draft 3 The aim of NHS Rotherham Clinical Commissioning Group s (RCCG) Human Resources Strategy is to ensure best practice in the management and development of all
More informationValue For Money Strategy 2016/21
Value For Money Strategy 2016/21 Prepared by Marcus Evans, Operations Director Governance and Compliance Date of last review: 14 th July 2016 Contents OVH Value for Money Strategy 3 Overall aim of VFM
More informationEquality, Diversity, Fairness and Opportunity Policy
Equality, Diversity, Fairness and Opportunity Policy CORMAC Collective V34 Current Document Status Version V1 Approving body CORMAC Date 10 September 201430 January 2014 Date of formal approval (if applicable)
More informationRisk Management Strategy
Risk Management Strategy Risk Management Strategy 2016-2018 Janet Young Governance & Risk Manager June 2016 Executive Lead Jane Meggitt, Director of Communications & Corporate Affairs Index Foreword...............
More informationAPPENDIX 1 DRAFT REVIEW AGAINST THE CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
APPENDIX 1 DRAFT REVIEW AGAINST THE CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 2016-17 Introduction The main principle underpinning the development of the new Delivering Good Governance in Local Government: Framework
More informationThe development of a quality scorecard to support primary care commissioning and contracting
World Class Commissioning for Primary Care 3 November 2008 The development of a quality scorecard to support primary care commissioning and contracting Background As world class commissioners, PCTs have
More informationMeeting Date 15 March 2018 Agenda Item 2d
Meeting Date 15 March 2018 Agenda Item 2d Report Title Board Assurance Framework (BAF) Report Author Pam Wenger, Corporate Governance Report Sponsor Pam Wenger, Corporate Governance Presented by Pam Wenger,
More informationRole Profile. Role Title: Head of Compliance. Directorate: Housing Services. Department: Property Services. Team: Compliance.
Role Profile Role Title: Head of Compliance Directorate: Housing Services Department: Property Services Team: Compliance Role Identifiers: - Career Ladder: Management - Level: Manager Level 3 - Function:
More informationRisk Management Strategy, Policy and Guidance
Risk Management Strategy, Policy and Guidance 11.0 Risk Management EQUALITY IMPACT The Trust strives to ensure equality of opportunity for all both as a major employer and as a provider of health care.
More informationCCG CO12 Policy and Framework for Partnership Governance
Corporate CCG CO12 Policy and Framework for Partnership Governance Version Number Date Issued Review Date V2: 21/02/2015 29/04/2015 21/02/2018 Prepared By: Consultation Process: Formally Approved: 25/02/2015
More informationID Title Location Inh > Res Owner/Manager Controls Actions (with Progress)
Risk 11 records found 1 Failure to recruit and retain sufficient skilled staff to ensure safe and effective service delivery 12 > 6 > 6 Director for Resources Specific recruitment plans in place for teams
More informationItem IG15/32 To improve health and provide excellent care
Committee Paper Integrated Governance Committee July 2015. Item IG15/32 To improve health and provide excellent care Title: Performance Management Strategy 2015 Author: Responsible Director: Summary of
More informationBelfast Health and Social Care Trust (BHSCT) Personal and Public Involvement (PPI) Monitoring Report September 2017
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (BHSCT) Personal and Public Involvement (PPI) Monitoring Report September 2017 Prepared by Martin Quinn and Claire Fordyce, PHA 1 Contents Introduction...... 3 Rationale
More informationPolicies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols
Policies, Procedures, Guidelines and Protocols Document Details Title Policy on the Development and Management of Procedural Documents (Strategies, Policies, Protocols and Guidelines) Trust Ref No 1361-28127
More informationTitle of Meeting: Governing Body Agenda Item: 7.4
Title of Meeting: Governing Body Agenda Item: 7.4 Date of Meeting: 6 April 2017 Paper Title: HaRD CCG Draft Governing Body Assurance Framework Refresh Responsible Governing Body Member Lead Joanne Crewe,
More informationSub-section Content. 1 Preliminaries - Post title: Head of Group Risk - Reports to: CRO - Division: xxx - Department: xxx - Location: xxx
Sub-section Content 1 Preliminaries - Post title: Head of Group Risk - Reports to: CRO - Division: xxx - Department: xxx - Location: xxx 2 Job Purpose - To assist in the maintenance and development of
More informationQuality Improvement and Performance Framework
Health Education East of England Quality Improvement and Performance Framework Education Providers Developing people for health and healthcare www.hee.nhs.uk hee.enquiries@nhs.net @NHS_HealthEdEng Contents
More informationBest Value in Public Services. Guidance for Accountable Officers
Best Value in Public Services Guidance for Accountable Officers Best Value in Public Services Guidance for Accountable Officers The Scottish Government, Edinburgh 2011 Crown copyright 2011 ISBN: 978-1-78045-146-6
More informationBoard Governance Statements for Self Certification
Board Governance Statements for Self Certification This document sets out compliance with the Monitor Board Statements as detailed in the document Applying for NHS Foundation Trust Status: A Guide for
More informationJOB DESCRIPTION. Medical Director
JOB DESCRIPTION Job Title: Accountable to: Deputy Medical Director Medical Director 1. Purpose of Role The Deputy Medical Director will provide support to the Medical Director in delivering the principle
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE: SELF ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 2013/14
AUDIT COMMITTEE: SELF ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 2013/14 Status Key 1 = must do 2 = should do 3 = could do Status Issue Yes No N/A Comments/ action COMPOSITION, ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES 1 Does the Audit Committee
More informationUnited Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust. Governance Statement 2015/16. Scope of responsibility. The governance framework of the organisation
United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust Governance Statement 2015/16 Scope of responsibility As Accountable Officer, and Chief Executive of this Board, I have responsibility for maintaining a sound system
More informationOrganisational Development Strategy
Regulators Patients Francis External Environment Mission and Strategy Structure Values and Behaviours Systems (Policies and Procedures) ERFORMANCE P ORGANISATIONAL Engagement Management Practices Culture
More informationRecruitment Consultant Level 3 End Point Assessment
Recruitment Consultant Level 3 End Point Assessment 1. Introduction This Assessment Plan for the Recruitment Consultant Apprenticeship has been designed and developed by employers with input from professional
More information29/11/2017. Risk Management Policy
1 Purpose APA Group (APA) is Australia s leading energy infrastructure business delivering smart, reliable and safe solutions through our deep industry knowledge and interconnected infrastructure. Risk
More informationLIVERPOOL HEART AND CHEST HOSPITAL EQUALITY AND INCLUSION STRATEGY
LIVERPOOL HEART AND CHEST HOSPITAL EQUALITY AND INCLUSION STRATEGY 2015-2018 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Background.. 4 3. Introduction. 4 4. External Picture 5 5. Our Internal Picture.. 6 6.
More informationSHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. HELD ON 25 SEPTEMBER 2018
SHEFFIELD TECHIN HOSPITLS NHS FOUNDTION TRUST EXECUTIVE SUMMRY REPORT TO THE BORD OF DIRECTORS. HELD ON 25 SEPTEMBER 2018 E Subject Supporting TE Member uthor Status 1 Workforce Race Equality Standard
More informationWorkforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) Data and Action Plan
Workforce Race Equality Standard (WRES) Data and Action Plan 2017-2018 No WRES Indicator Metric and data set (UNIFY2: 2017) 1. Percentage of BME staff in bands 8-9 and Very Senior Managers (VSM) including
More information