TRB WEBINAR PROGRAM Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual: Contents
|
|
- Chester Dennis Douglas
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB WEBINAR PROGRAM Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual: Contents Tuesday, May 30, :00-3:30 PM ET
2 The Transportation Research Board has met the standards and requirements of the Registered Continuing Education Providers Program. Credit earned on completion of this program will be reported to RCEP. A certificate of completion will be issued to participants that have registered and attended the entire session. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or construed to be an approval or endorsement by RCEP.
3 Purpose Discuss how the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) can be used to support agencies planning, programming and management decisions in a costeffective manner. Learning Objectives At the end of this webinar, you will be able to: Describe what planning and preliminary engineering mean in an HCM context Understand why the Guide was developed, its intended audience, and its general structure Identify common planning tasks to which HCM methods can potentially be applied Apply the case studies provided in the Guide to specific planning tasks
4 Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the HCM Part 1: Content May 30, 2017
5 NCHRP is a State-Driven Program Sponsored by individual state DOTs who Suggest research of national interest Serve on oversight panels that guide the research. Administered by TRB in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration.
6 Practical, ready-to-use results Applied research aimed at state DOT practitioners Often become AASHTO standards, specifications, guides, syntheses Can be applied in planning, design, construction, operations, maintenance, safety, environment
7 Welcome Brian Dunn Transportation Planning Analysis Manager, Oregon DOT Planning & Preliminary Engineering Subcommittee Chair, TRB Committee on Highway Capacity & Quality of Service Member of project panel for the Guide
8 Instructors Tom Creasey, PE, Ph.D. Principal, Stantec Chair, TRB Highway Capacity & QOS Committee Co-author of the Guide Paul Ryus, PE Principal Engineer, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Member, TRB Highway Capacity & QOS Committee Co-author of the Guide 5
9 Learning Objectives Define planning and preliminary engineering in an HCM context Understand why the Guide was developed, its intended audience, and its general structure Identify common planning tasks to which HCM methods can potentially be applied Identify the case studies provided in the Guide that demonstrate the application of HCM planning methods to specific planning tasks 6
10 Webinar Content 1. Overview 2. Scope and Structure 3. Applications and References 4. Part 1: Guide Overview 5. Part 2: Medium-Level Analyses 6. Part 3: High-Level Analyses 7. Case Studies (Webinar #2) 8. Wrap-Up 7
11 Webinar Content 1. Overview 2. Scope and Structure 3. Applications and References 4. Part 1: Guide Overview 5. Part 2: Medium-Level Analyses 6. Part 3: High-Level Analyses 7. Case Studies (Webinar #2) 8. Wrap-Up 8
12 Purpose of the Guide The HCM is commonly used by transportation agencies to evaluate the current or forecast operations of roadway facilities Less well known is that the HCM can also be used to cost-effectively and reliably support agencies planning, programming, and management decisions 9
13 Scope of the HCM The HCM has traditionally focused on describing detailed methods for estimating roadway operational performance Concepts, step-by-step computational methods, example problems More limited information has been available for planning applications Default values, generalized service volume tables, quick estimation methods 10
14 Planning Applications in an HCM Context Evaluation of predicted or forecasted conditions for various facility types Application of HCM methods using combinations of actual data, default values, and/or simplifying assumptions More generalized answers (e.g. Is this sufficient? ) over wider areas and/or longer timeframes Back-of-the-envelope calculations Input to project prioritization processes Source of performance measures used in performance monitoring 11
15 Current Use of the HCM in Planning State DOTs, MPOs, local governments, and others were surveyed Less-experienced users less likely than expert users to see value in using the HCM for planning More use with short-term than long-term planning 12
16 Users Desired HCM Improvements for Planning Develop a P&PE Applications Guide (77%) Provide travel time reliability measures (63%) Extend HCM to system and corridor analyses (63%) Integrate HCM methods better with travel demand models (60%) Provide systemwide MOEs (60%) 13
17 NCHRP Project Objectives Develop a guide on the use of the HCM for planning and preliminary engineering applications by identifying appropriate methods and applications, illustrating them with case studies. Aspects included: Appropriate use of different parts of HCM for a broad spectrum of planning/preliminary engineering applications Use in scenario planning Coordination with other analytical tools Oversaturated conditions in a planning context 14
18 Webinar Content 1. Overview 2. Scope and Structure 3. Applications and References 4. Part 1: Guide Overview 5. Part 2: Medium-Level Analyses 6. Part 3: High-Level Analyses 7. Case Studies (Webinar #2) 8. Wrap-Up 15
19 Levels of Planning Analysis High level Large analysis area Low detail Medium level Focus on a single roadway facility, segment, or intersection Greater detail Low level Highly focused and highly detailed 16
20 17 Relative Detail of HCM-Based Analysis Methods
21 Focus of the Guide Multifacility Single facility, point 18
22 19 Guide s Relationship to the Project Life Cycle
23 Guide s Relationship to the HCM: Similarities Documents cross-reference each other Both documents present methods for estimating a variety of transportation performance measures Guide s methods are derived from HCM methods Simplified to reflect the amount and quality of data typically available for planning studies 20
24 Guide s Relationship to the HCM: Differences Guide is not intended to replace the HCM Guide s methods should not be used to make final decisions about roadway design features Computational tools HCM: Specialized software Guide: Computations by hand, worksheets, spreadsheets 21
25 Audiences for the Guide Current HCM users Planning or preliminary engineering level analyses with limited available data Questions requiring a quick, reasonable answer Planners who may not be aware of the HCM or consider themselves HCM users, but who can nevertheless use it for portions of their work Coordinated use of the HCM with planning models and tools Integration of HCM methods and defaults into planning tools System performance monitoring University students 22
26 Organization of the Guide Guide is not intended to be read cover-to-cover Four parts Overview Medium-level analysis High-level analysis Case studies Guide uses lettered sections A V to contrast with numbered HCM chapters
27 Organization of the Guide Part 1: Overview (Sections A G) Entry point to the guide for non-hcm users Menus directing readers to guidebook sections addressing different planning applications Topics referenced throughout the manual Working with traffic demand data Predicting future intersection traffic control Using default values to reduce data needs Using service volume tables to reduce computational effort Field Measurements? Use Defaults 24
28 Organization of the Guide Part 2: Medium-Level Analysis (Sections H P) Entry point to the guide for HCM users HCM 6th Edition refers readers to specific guidebook sections Organized by HCM system element Freeways, two-lane highways, urban streets, etc. Plus bicycle, pedestrians, transit, and truck (freight) modes Typical subsections Scoping and screening method HCM method with defaults Alternate or extended HCM method 25
29 Organization of the Guide Part 3: High-Level Analysis (Sections Q S) Extensions of the HCM to larger study areas Corridors Areas and systems Systemwide performance monitoring 26
30 Organization of the Guide Part 4: Case Studies (Sections T V) In-depth examples of applying the Guide s methods Freeway master plan Arterial bus rapid transit analysis Long-range transportation plan 27
31 Webinar Content 1. Overview 2. Scope and Structure 3. Applications and References 4. Part 1: Guide Overview 5. Part 2: Medium-Level Analyses 6. Part 3: High-Level Analyses 7. Case Studies (Webinar #2) 8. Wrap-Up 28
32 Applications and References within the PPEAG Reference tables associating applications tasks with related sections and case studies Application areas Screening and scoping Areawide transportation planning Project impact and alternatives analysis System performance monitoring 29
33 Webinar Content 1. Overview 2. Scope and Structure 3. Applications and References 4. Part 1: Guide Overview 5. Part 2: Medium-Level Analyses 6. Part 3: High-Level Analyses 7. Case Studies (Webinar #2) 8. Wrap-Up 30
34 Part 1 Sections A. Introduction B. Medium-Level (Facility-Specific) Analyses C. High-Level Analyses D. Working with Traffic Demand Data E. Predicting Intersection Traffic Control F. Default Values G. Service Volume Tables 31
35 Section A: Introduction Overview Scope of the Guide Definitions Applications Levels of analysis Relationship to the Guide to the project life cycle Target audience How to use the Guide Hierarchy of analysis methods 32
36 Section B: Medium-Level (Facility-Specific) Analyses Overview Project traffic and environmental impact studies Typical process Typical analysis tools Basic data needs How the HCM can support these types of analyses Applications of default values 33
37 Medium-Level Analysis Tasks Addressed in the Guide Project Impact and Alternatives Analysis Task Input to travel demand models (if used) Reference Sections in Part 3 Related Case Studies in Part 4 Estimate capacities and free-flow speeds R 3.1 Traffic assignment in travel demand models (if used) Estimate congested speeds R 3.2 Input to microsimulation model (if used) Estimate free-flow speeds H-N None Microsimulation model (if used) validation and error checking Estimate capacity for error-checking simulated bottlenecks H-N None Project impact and alternatives analyses Estimate segment speeds for air quality and noise analyses H-N 1.3, 2.4 Estimate auto intersection utilization (v/c ratios) H-N 2.2, 2.3 Estimate delay H-N 2.4 Estimate queuing H-N 1.5, 2.5 Interpret results H-N 1, 2 Analyze travel time reliability H, K 1.6 Estimate quality of service for transit, bicycles and pedestrians O 2.6 Estimate truck level of service P None Corridor analysis Q None 34
38 Section C: High-Level Analyses Overview Screening and scoping studies Roles of the HCM and the Guide Long- and short-range areawide transportation planning Typical process, tools, data needs How the HCM can support these types of analyses System performance monitoring Context Roles of the HCM and the Guide 35
39 Screening and Scoping Tasks Addressed in the Guide Screening and Scoping Task Screen for potential level of service (LOS) hot spots Reference Sections in Parts 2 and 3 Related Case Studies in Part 4 Auto LOS problems H-N 1.4, 2.4 Truck LOS problems P None Transit, bicycle, and pedestrian LOS problems Identify potential auto capacity problems Preliminary evaluation of improvement alternatives O 2.6 H-N 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 Auto improvements H-N 1.7 Truck improvements H-N None Transit, bicycle, and pedestrian O
40 Areawide Transportation Planning Tasks Addressed in the Guide Task Input to travel demand models (TDMs) Reference Sections in Part 3 Related Case Studies in Part 4 Estimate segment capacities and free-flow speeds R 3.1 Traffic assignment in TDMs Estimate congested speeds R 3.2 Post-processing TDM Outputs Estimate speeds for AQ analyses R 3.3 Quick screening to identify v/c and LOS hot spots R 3.3 Estimate delay R 3.3 Estimate queuing R 3.3 Interpret results R 3.3 Analyze travel time reliability R 3.4 Estimate quality of service for autos, trucks, transit, R None bicycles, and pedestrians Corridor analyses Q None 37
41 System Performance Monitoring Tasks Addressed in the Guide Task Estimate monitoring site capacities and free-flow speeds Volume-only monitoring sites Reference Sections in Part 3 Related Case Studies in Part 4 R4 3.1 Traffic assignment in travel demand models R5 3.2 Travel time-only monitoring sites Estimate congestion S3 None Performance analysis Auto and truck vehicle miles traveled by level of service R5 None Estimate delay R5 3.3 Estimate queuing R5 3.3 Analyze travel time reliability R5 3.4 Estimate multimodal level of service for transit, bicycles, R5 None and pedestrians Estimate truck level of service R5 None 38
42 Section D: Working with Traffic Demand Data Overview Selecting an analysis hour Converting daily volumes to shorter timeframes Seasonal adjustments to traffic volumes Rounding traffic volumes Observed volumes vs. actual demand Constraining demand due to upstream bottlenecks Converting link volumes to turning movements 39
43 Section E: Predicting Intersection Traffic Control Overview Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Estimating 8th- and 4thhighest hour volumes Applying MUTCD warrants Graphical method Identifies likely future intersection control for use in a planning analysis Not intended for final decisions 40
44 Section F: Default Values to Reduce Data Needs Overview When to consider default values Sources of default values Developing local default values Field Measurements? Use Defaults 41
45 Section G: Service Volume Tables to Reduce Analysis Effort Overview Description When to consider service volume tables K- D- Four-Lane Streets Six-Lane Streets Factor Factor LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS C LOS D LOS E Posted Speed Limit = 45 mph ,500 33,600 36,800 25,400 51,700 55, ,100 30,800 33,700 23,400 47,400 50, ,900 30,200 33,100 23,000 46,500 49, ,600 27,700 30,300 21,000 42,700 45, ,500 27,500 30,100 20,900 42,300 45, ,400 25,200 27,600 19,100 38,800 41,500 Sources of generalized service volume tables HCM Florida DOT Local tables 42
46 Webinar Content 1. Overview 2. Scope and Structure 3. Applications and References 4. Part 1: Guide Overview 5. Part 2: Medium-Level Analyses 6. Part 3: High-Level Analyses 7. Case Studies (Webinar #2) 8. Wrap-Up 43
47 Part 2 Sections H. Freeway Analyses I. Multilane Highways J. Two-Lane Highways K. Urban Streets L. Signalized Intersections M. Stop-Controlled Intersections N. Roundabouts O. Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and Public Transit P. Truck Level of Service 44
48 Typical Part 2 Section Outline Overview Applications Analysis Methods Overview Scoping and Screening Method Section Analysis Applying the HCM with Defaults Simplified HCM Facility Method Reliability (freeways, urban streets, signals) Multimodal LOS cross-reference Case study cross-reference 45
49 Scoping and Screening Applying generalized service volume tables Developing service volumes Applicable system elements: Freeways Multilane highways Two-lane highways Urban streets Peak-Hour Peak-Direction (veh/h/ln) AADT (2-way veh/day/ln) Area LOS E LOS E Type Terrain LOS A-C LOS D (capacity) LOS A-C LOS D (capacity) Urban Level 1,550 1,890 2,150 14,400 17,500 19,900 Urban Rolling 1,480 1,810 2,050 13,700 16,700 19,000 Rural Level 1,460 1,770 2,010 12,100 14,800 16,800 Rural Rolling 1,310 1,600 1,820 11,000 13,400 15,200 46
50 Section Analysis Using the HCM with Defaults Applies the HCM operations method, but using default values for many inputs to reduce data requirements Requires access to HCM-implementing software Guide provides information on what input data are needed to apply the method Guide suggests default values for inputs that can be defaulted Applicable system elements: Freeways, multilane highways, two-lane highways Urban streets, signalized intersections 47
51 Example Data Requirements for Multilane Highways For For HCM Facility Input Data (units) Section Method Default Value Hourly directional volume (veh/h) Must be provided Number of directional lanes Must be provided Terrain type (level, rolling, etc.) Must be provided* Lane width (ft) 12 Total lateral clearance (ft) 12 8 (rural), 16 (low-density suburban), Access points/mile 25 (high-density suburban) Free-flow speed (mph) Must be provided Percentage heavy vehicles (%) 10 (rural), 5 (suburban)** Peak hour factor (decimal) 0.88 (rural), 0.95 (suburban) Section length (mi) Must be provided Intersection performance data Must be provided 48
52 Simplified HCM Method Most HCM operations methods require specialized software to implement Many target users of the Guide won t have access to this software Using the HCM method with defaults may require more resources than available or appropriate for the analysis The Guide presents simplified methods that are HCM-compatible, but can be performed by hand or implemented in a basic spreadsheet Multiple performance measures can be calculated Simplified methods available for all system elements 49
53 Example Data Requirements for the Simplified Signalized Intersection Method Performance Measure Input Data (units) Cap Del LOS MMLOS Que Default Value Number of turn lanes Must be provided Other geometry HCM Exhibit Signal timing HCM Exhibits and (total entering volume <1,000 Peak hour factor (decimal) veh/h), 0.92 (otherwise) Percentage heavy vehicles (%) 3% Parking activity None Pedestrian activity None Volumes by movement (veh/h) Must be provided Analysis period length (h) 0.25 h Cap = capacity, Del = delay, LOS = motorized vehicle level of service, MMLOS = motorized vehicle component of multimodal level of service, Que = queue length 50
54 Other Topics in Part 2 Freeways Method adaptations for advanced freeway management practices Urban streets Method extension to over-capacity conditions 51
55 Section O: Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and Public Transit Freeways Multilane and Two-Lane Highways Urban Streets Signalized Intersections Stop-Controlled Intersections Roundabouts Off-Street Pathways Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 52
56 Section P: Truck Level of Service The HCM doesn t provide a truck LOS measure NCFRP Report 31 does, and it has been incorporated into the Guide Truck LOS is based on the degree to which a roadway provides ideal truck conditions Usable by trucks with legal size and weight loads No at-grade railroad crossings Provides reliable truck travel at truck free-flow speeds Low cost (i.e., no tolls) 53
57 Webinar Content 1. Overview 2. Scope and Structure 3. Applications and References 4. Part 1: Guide Overview 5. Part 2: Medium-Level Analyses 6. Part 3: High-Level Analyses 7. Case Studies (Webinar #2) 8. Wrap-Up 54
58 Part 3 Sections Q. Corridor Quick Estimation Screenline Analysis R. Areas and Systems S. Roadway System Monitoring 55
59 Section Q: Corridor Quick Estimation Screenline Analysis Quick method for assessing corridor capacity More-detailed assessments would use Section R (area) techniques or facility-specific methods from Part 2 56
60 Section R: Areas and Systems Area- and systemwide analysis is typically performed in a travel demand modeling environment Section R provides guidance on: Using HCM procedures to generate the key performance analysis inputs required by typical demand models Post-processing demand model output to generate additional performance measures Supports HCM-compatible analyses and measures as a project moves from need to concept to design 57
61 Section S: Roadway System Monitoring Guidance on identifying and diagnosing travel-time reliability and capacity problems Method assumes that the agency has access to archived average travel times by road segment and time of day The travel time index, the ratio of actual to free-flow travel time, is a useful indicator of congestion problem spots Florida DOT 58
62 Webinar Content 1. Overview 2. Scope and Structure 3. Applications and References 4. Part 1: Guide Overview 5. Part 2: Medium-Level Analyses 6. Part 3: High-Level Analyses 7. Case Studies (Webinar #2) 8. Wrap-Up 59
63 Part 4: Case Studies (Webinar Part 2) Case Study 1: Freeway Master Plan Case Study 2: Arterial Bus Rapid Transit Analysis Case Study 3: Long-Range Transportation Plan Part 2 of the webinar will also address the use of HCM performance measures in roadway monitoring 60 60
64 Webinar Content 1. Overview 2. Scope and Structure 3. Applications and References 4. Part 1: Guide Overview 5. Part 2: Medium-Level Analyses 6. Part 3: High-Level Analyses 7. Case Studies (Webinar #2) 8. Wrap-Up 61
65 Resources The Guide can be downloaded from HCM Volume 4 Free, one-time registration required Five spreadsheet computational engines provided on Volume 4 to help implement some of the Guide s methods Project underway to develop additional outreach and training materials to support the Guide These materials will be posted on Volume 4 over the course of 2017 as they are completed 62
66 Summary The Guide provides a resource for both HCM users and planning professionals to: Conduct quick back-of-the-envelope evaluations where neither a full HCM analysis nor simulation is necessary Maintain consistency with the HCM throughout the project development process Incorporate HCM methods into planning tools Develop inputs used by planning models Improve the accuracy and consistency of computations performed by planning models Post-process model outputs to generate additional performance measures 63
67 Questions? 64
68 Panelists Presentations After the webinar, you will receive a follow-up containing a link to the recording
69 Today s Participants Tom Creasey, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., Tom.Creasey@stantec.com Paul Ryus, Kittelson & Associates, pryus@kittelson.com Brian Dunn, Oregon Department of Transportation, Brian.G.DUNN@odot.state.or.us
70 Get Involved with TRB Getting involved is free! Join a Standing Committee ( Search for AHB40 (Highway Capacity and Quality of Service) Become a Friend of a Committee Networking opportunities May provide a path to become a Standing Committee member For more information: Create your account and update your profile Next webinar on NCHRP Report 825: Applications on June th TRB Annual Meeting: January 7-11, 2018
71 Get Involved with NCHRP Suggest NCHRP research topics Volunteer to serve on NCHRP panels Lead pilot projects and other implementation efforts at your agency For more information:
HCM 6th Edition Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide (PPEAG) to the HCM Bringing Back-of-the-Envelope Back.
HCM 6th Edition Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide (PPEAG) to the HCM Bringing Back-of-the-Envelope Back April, 2017 Potential Use of the HCM in Planning The HCM is commonly used to
More informationThe New Highway Capacity Manual 6 th Edition It s Not Your Father s HCM
The New Highway Capacity Manual 6 th Edition It s Not Your Father s HCM Tom Creasey, PE, PhD Principal, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Chair, TRB Highway Capacity and Quality of Service Committee Presented
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. A New Functional Classification System to Aid Contextual Design. Monday, February 5, :00-3:30PM ET
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD A New Functional Classification System to Aid Contextual Design Monday, February 5, 2018 2:00-3:30PM ET The Transportation Research Board has met the standards and requirements
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects: Geometric Design. Tuesday, October 2, :00-3:30 PM ET
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects: Geometric Design Tuesday, October 2, 2018 2:00-3:30 PM ET The Transportation Research Board has met the standards and
More informationCHAPTER 2: MODELING METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER 2: MODELING METHODOLOGY 2.1 PROCESS OVERVIEW The methodology used to forecast future conditions consisted of traditional traffic engineering practices and tools with enhancements to more accurately
More informationPast, Present, and Future
The Highway Capacity Manual: Past, Present, and Future HCM Chronology 1 st Ed.: 1950 BPR/HRB/GPO (147 Pgs) 1957 Highway Research Board Bulletin 167 2 nd Ed: 1965 TRB Special Report 87 (411 pgs) 1980 TRB
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Spatial Modeling for Highway Performance Monitoring System Data: Part 1. Tuesday, February 27, :00-4:00 PM ET
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD Spatial Modeling for Highway Performance Monitoring System Data: Part 1 Tuesday, February 27, 2018 2:00-4:00 PM ET The Transportation Research Board has met the standards
More informationTHE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL
THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL AASHTO Subcommittee on Design June 16, 2006 1 Overview of Presentation Purpose of the Highway Safety Manual Highway Safety Manual Contents Challenges Ahead 2 3 Is this road safe
More informationVolume to Capacity Estimation of Signalized Road Networks for Metropolitan Transportation Planning. Hiron Fernando, BSCE. A Thesis CIVIL ENGINEERING
Volume to Capacity Estimation of Signalized Road Networks for Metropolitan Transportation Planning by Hiron Fernando, BSCE A Thesis In CIVIL ENGINEERING Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech
More informationINSIDE THIS ISSUE. mctrans.ce.ufl.edu VOLUME 64 \\ OCTOBER Streets Heat Map Freeways Animation HSM Supplement
mctrans.ce.ufl.edu INSIDE THIS ISSUE McTrans Center University of Florida Civil & Coastal Engineering PO Box 116585 Gainesville, FL 32611-6585 Streets Heat Map Freeways Animation HSM Supplement Phone:
More informationNCHRP 3-88 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing
Session 312 Updates on NCHRP-Funded Geometric Design Research Projects NCHRP 3-88 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing Brian L. Ray, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc Portland, Oregon bray@ kittelson.com
More informationAPPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies
APPENDIX B Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies Revised December 7, 2010 via Resolution # 100991 Reformatted March 18, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationThe Secrets to HCM Consistency Using Simulation Models
The Secrets to HCM Consistency Using Simulation Models Ronald T. Milam, AICP David Stanek, PE Chris Breiland Fehr & Peers 2990 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 200 Roseville, CA 95661 r.milam@fehrandpeers.com (916)
More informationNCHRP Report 687 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing
Updates on NCHRP-Funded Geometric Design Research Projects NCHRP Report 687 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing Brian L. Ray, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc Portland, Oregon bray@ kittelson.com
More informationHCM2010 Chapter 10 Freeway Facilities User s Guide to FREEVAL2010
HCM200 Chapter 0 Freeway Facilities User s Guide to FREEVAL200 Prepared by: N. Rouphail, and B. Schroeder Institute for Transportation Research & Education (ITRE) Brian Eads, Crawford, Murphy and Tilly
More informationNATMEC June 30, 2014 Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP
NATMEC June 30, 2014 Anita Vandervalk, PE, PMP Agenda 1. Florida s MPM Program 2. Research Efforts and Progress 3. Source Book 4. Transitioning to Real Time Data 5. Next Steps Importance of Mobility Providing
More informationCity of Berkeley. Guidelines for Development of Traffic Impact Reports
Office of Transportation (OOT) City of Berkeley Guidelines for Development of Traffic Impact Reports Office of Transportation, City of Berkeley 1 1. Overview These guidelines provide a framework to help
More informationAn Introduction to the. Safety Manual
An Introduction to the Highway Safety Manual An Introduction to the HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Table of Contents Section 1: HSM Overview... 1 What is the Highway Safety Manual?... 1 How is the HSM Applied?...
More informationGUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES
GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES Adopted by Town Council on November 25, 2008 Prepared By: HNTB Engineering Department Planning Department TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II.
More informationAppendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance
APPENDICES Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance D.1 Functional classification identifies the role a highway or street plays in the transportation
More informationAppendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance
Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance Functional classification identifies the role a highway or street plays in the transportation system. Some highways
More informationMULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES
MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES 1 st Edition City of San Luis Obispo 2035 Circulation Element 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Process... 2 When Impact Studies Are Required... 3
More information6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS
6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS 6.1 MODEL RUN SUMMARY NOTEBOOK The Model Run Summary Notebook (under separate cover) provides documentation of the multiple
More informationWoodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report
Final Report Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report Prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation April 212 Prepared by DKS Associates Contents Methodologies... 4 Volume Development...
More informationAMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA
AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA Introduction: North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority NJTPA Congestion Management Process Study Goals Analysis
More informationINSIDE THIS ISSUE. mctrans.ce.ufl.edu VOLUME 65 \\ JANUARY Capacity Analysis Webinars. Bus Bike-Rack App HCS Release 7.5
mctrans.ce.ufl.edu INSIDE THIS ISSUE Bus Bike-Rack App HCS Release 7.5 Capacity Analysis Webinars McTrans Center University of Florida Civil & Coastal Engineering PO Box 116585 Gainesville, FL 32611-6585
More informationTraffic Data Quality Analysis. James Sturrock, PE, PTOE, FHWA Resource Center Operations Team
Traffic Analysis James Sturrock, PE, PTOE, FHWA Resource Center Operations Team Source Material Traffic Measurement http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/jpodocs/repts_te/14058.htm Seven DEADLY Misconceptions about Information
More informationMulti-Resolution Traffic Modeling for Transform 66 Inside the Beltway Projects. Prepared by George Lu, Shankar Natarajan
Multi-Resolution Traffic Modeling for Transform 66 Inside the Beltway Projects Prepared by George Lu, Shankar Natarajan 2017 VASITE Annual Meeting, June 29, 2017 Outline Transform I-66 Inside the Beltway
More informationWhat is the Dakota County Principal Arterial Study?
What is the Dakota County Principal Arterial Study? The Dakota County is underway and will address future designations of certain highways as Principal Arterials. What Are Principal Arterials? Principal
More information9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT
9. TRAVEL FORECAST MODEL DEVELOPMENT To examine the existing transportation system and accurately predict impacts of future growth, a travel demand model is necessary. A travel demand model is a computer
More informationHighway Safety Analysis Tools for Engineers
Highway Safety Analysis Tools for Engineers Xiaoduan Sun University of Louisiana Lafayette Dan Magri Hadi H. Shirazi Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development The 2007 Louisiana Transportation
More informationAPPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS
APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS Travel demand models (TDM) simulate current travel conditions and forecast future travel patterns and conditions based on planned system improvements
More informationState of the Practice - How Public Transportation is addressed in Traffic Impact Studies ITE Transit and Traffic Impact Studies Committee
State of the Practice - How Public Transportation is addressed in Traffic Impact Studies ITE Transit and Traffic Impact Studies Committee Purpose of Report Relevant Literature Survey Results Current and
More informationCity of Menifee. Public Works Department. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Public Works Department Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Revised: August 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 PURPOSE... 3 EXEMPTIONS... 3 SCOPING... 4 METHODOLOGY... 5 STUDY AREA... 6 STUDY SCENARIOS...
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Spatial Modeling for Highway Performance Monitoring System Data: Part 2. Tuesday, March 6, :00-3:00 PM ET
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD Spatial Modeling for Highway Performance Monitoring System Data: Part 2 Tuesday, March 6, 2018 1:00-3:00 PM ET The Transportation Research Board has met the standards and
More informationNorth Central Texas Council of Governments 157
13. Transportation System Safety The goal of the Transportation System Safety Program Area is to improve transportation safety throughout the region by supporting planning efforts to develop safety policies,
More informationComparing Roundabout Capacity Analysis Methods, or How the Selection of Analysis Method Can Affect the Design
Comparing Roundabout Capacity Analysis Methods, or How the Selection of Analysis Method Can Affect the Design ABSTRACT Several analysis methods have been proposed to analyze the vehicular capacity of roundabouts.
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Beyond Volume: Investment Prioritization Methods for Low-Volume Roads. Wednesday, August 29, :00-2:30 PM ET
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD Beyond Volume: Investment Prioritization Methods for Low-Volume Roads Wednesday, August 29, 2018 1:00-2:30 PM ET The Transportation Research Board has met the standards and
More informationThe TIS is to be signed and sealed by a Florida Registered Professional Engineer.
CHAPTER 900. SECTION 901. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS 901.5. Transportation Impact Study A. Intent and Purpose The intent and purpose of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is to identify
More informationTRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES
TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES December 2013 The scope of the traffic impact analysis (TIA) should follow these guidelines and the requirements of VMC 11.80.130 and VMC 11.70, transportation concurrency (attached
More informationGeometric Design: Past, Present, and Future
A2A02: Committee on Geometric Design Chairman: Daniel B. Fambro Geometric Design: Past, Present, and Future DANIEL B. FAMBRO, Texas A&M University JOHN C. COLLINGS, Delcan Corporation ROBERT DELLA VEDOVA,
More informationUPDATE OF THE SIGNAL TIMING MANUAL
Project No. 3-103 COPY NO. X UPDATE OF THE SIGNAL TIMING MANUAL PRELIMINARY DRAFT FINAL REPORT Prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies
More informationAppendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements
July 8, 2016 Appendix O. Appendix O Standard and Measurements Definition Level of service (LOS) is a mechanism used to determine how well a transportation facility is operating from a traveler s perspective.
More informationUrban Street Safety, Operation, and Reliability
Urban Street Safety, Operation, and Reliability March 2012 Overview Background Urban Street Operation Urban Street Safety Combined Operation and Safety Evaluation Reliability Evaluation 2 1 Background
More informationStatewide Roundabout Guidance
Statewide Roundabout Guidance Chris Tiesler, PE Associate Engineer Michael Clements, PE Signal & Arterial System Manager Agenda Background Three Tools Screening Tool Spreadsheet Tool Design Guidance Primer
More informationTRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES
January 28, 2009 POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES Related to Highway Occupancy Permits Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Highway Safety and Traffic Engineering
More informationDIVISION I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES ENGINEERING STANDARDS
CITY OF ALBANY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES ENGINEERING STANDARDS Prepared By PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ALBANY, OREGON 97321 Telephone: (541) 917-7676 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationGUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (ZONING PETITIONS)
GUIDELINES FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (ZONING PETITIONS) (A) INTENT This Section is intended to help ensure that new development does not adversely affect the capacity of streets and intersections to
More informationProposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process
Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Statewide Planning Program January 2018 Summary Outline of of Action Steps 1. Develop Objectives for Congestion Management What is the desired
More informationCITY OF VALLEJO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT Analysis/Study GUIDELINES
The City Engineer, under the authority of the Public Works Director and recommendations from the Traffic Engineer, will make the final decision on the need for a traffic study. The purpose of the traffic
More informationA Highway Capacity Planning Application and Development of Default Values in North Carolina
0 0 0 0 A Highway Capacity Planning Application and Development of Default Values in North Carolina Daniel J. Findley, PhD, PE* Senior Research Associate, Institute for Transportation Research and Education
More informationTraffic Signal Timing: What s Your Priority? Transportation Education Series May 8, 2012
Traffic Signal Timing: What s Your Priority? Transportation Education Series May 8, 2012 Presentation Outline New Direction in Traffic Signal Timing Manual Applications Why Are We Doing This Project? Improve
More informationInteractive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July 21, 2009
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) AASHTO Subcommittee on Design July 21, 2009 Agenda Overview Module Discussions Typical Applications Relationship to HSM Status and Future Plan Additional
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Town of Queen Creek
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Town of Queen Creek January 2016 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to outline the procedures and requirements for preparing a Transportation Impact Analysis
More informationTOWN OF BARGERSVILLE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES
TOWN OF BARGERSVILLE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Town of Bargersville Department of Development 24 North Main Street, P.O. Box 420 Bargersville, Indiana 46106 Adopted by the Bargersville
More informationSABRA, WANG & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers Planners Analysts
SABRA, WANG & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers Planners Analysts TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Mr. Eric Graye, Planning Supervisor, Functional Planning and Policy Division, Montgomery County Planning Department
More informationArticle 16 Traffic Impact Analysis
Article 16 Traffic Impact Analysis Table of Contents... 16-1 Chapter 16.1 Purpose and Intent... 16-2 Chapter 16.2 Applicability... 16-2 Chapter 16.3 Exemptions... 16-2 Chapter 16.4 Trip Generation Data...
More informationBenefit Cost Analysis Narrative
Chicago Region Environmental and Transportation Efficiency Program (CREATE) Grade Separations of: GS21a - Union Pacific and 95 th Street GS11 - Belt Railway Company of Chicago and Columbus Ave. GS 9 -
More informationPresented to : I 710 Project Committee June 30, 2011
Presented to : I 710 Project Committee June 30, 2011 Overview Metro s Public Private Partnership (PPP) program Traffic Effects of Tolling Trucks on I 710 Statutory Authority for Tolling Interstate Highways
More informationLivability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018
Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update Transportation Policy Board (TPB) August 23, 2018 1 Oct. 2017 Plan Kick-Off Sept. 2019 Plan Adoption Timeline Livability 2050 Regional Transportation
More informationCopy. Final Report to the NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM (NCHRP)
Copy Guidance for the Use of Alternative Traffic Analysis Tools in Highway Capacity Analyses Final Report to the NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM (NCHRP) Prepared by The University of Florida
More informationFlorida s Mobility Performance Measures and Experience
Florida s Mobility Performance Measures and Experience By Douglas S. McLeod (corresponding author) Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Tel. 850-414-4932
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...
Amendment No. 2 to Reclamation Plan 2006-01 Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS... IX
More informationMOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
6 MOBILITY AND ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS BACK OF SECTION DIVIDER 6.0 Mobility and Alternatives Analysis Travel demand analysis provides a framework for the identification of transportation facilities and services
More informationApplication of Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems. June 15, 2016
Application of Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems June 15, 2016 Today s Presenters Moderator Dr. Sue Chrysler, Texas A&M Transportation Institute Brief Background and Layout of the Human Factors
More informationMARC Congestion Management Process Policy
MARC Congestion Management Process Policy Adopted by the MARC Board of Directors on May 24, 2011 Background Traffic congestion can be generally defined as a condition where the volume of users on a transportation
More informationTRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSISGUIDELINES
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSISGUIDELINES ADOPTED OCTOBER2014 SANTACLARAVALLEYTRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY CONGESTION MANAGEMENTPROGRAM CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
More informationPERFORMANCE-BASED ANALYSIS OF GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS SUPPLEMENTAL RESEARCH MATERIALS REPORT
Project No. 15-34A PERFORMANCE-BASED ANALYSIS OF GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS SUPPLEMENTAL RESEARCH MATERIALS REPORT Prepared for: National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation
More informationRegional Evaluation Decision tool for Smart Growth
Regional Evaluation Decision tool for Smart Growth Maren Outwater, Robert Cervero, Jerry Walters, Colin Smith, Christopher Gray, Rich Kuzmyak Objectives This project is one of the SHRP 2 Capacity projects
More informationRTC Mobility Plan Workshop. North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015
RTC Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments July 9, 2015 Agenda 1. Introduction to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2. New Planning Parameters 3. Emerging Planning and
More informationProject Prioritization for Urban and Rural Projects TEAM CONFERENCE March 7, 2018
Project Prioritization for Urban and Rural Projects 2018 TEAM CONFERENCE March 7, 2018 Challenge Limited funding for transportation improvements requires strategic selection of projects to ensure resource
More informationGuidelines for the Submission of a Transportation Study Level 2
Guidelines for the Submission of a Transportation Study Level 2 For Site Development Applications in the City of North Vancouver Transportation Group, City of North Vancouver Engineering, Parks & Environment
More informationThe Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges
The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges I. ABSTRACT Keith A. Riniker, PE, PTOE This paper presents the Folded Interchange design and compares
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Design of Interchange Loop Ramps and Pavement/ Shoulder Cross-Slope Breaks. Monday, November 13, :00-3:30PM ET
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD Design of Interchange Loop Ramps and Pavement/ Shoulder Cross-Slope Breaks Monday, November 13, 2017 2:00-3:30PM ET The Transportation Research Board has met the standards
More informationStandardization of Travel Demand Models
Standardization of Travel Demand Models TNMUG Meeting November 14, 2013 The North Carolina Experience Leta F. Huntsinger, Ph.D., P.E. and Rhett Fussell, P.E. Background } North Carolina Profile } 18 MPOs,
More informationTRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION NEPA PROGRAM LOCATION STUDIES TRAFFIC ANALYSES TO SUPPORT NEPA STUDIES CONSULTANT RESOURCE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Issued on: November 18, 2016 Last
More informationTechnical Memorandum. 720 SW Washington Suite 500 Portland, OR dksassociates.com. DATE: July 12, 2017
Technical Memorandum DATE: July 12, 2017 TO: Kay Bork City of Veneta Bill Johnston, AICP Oregon Department of Transportation Christina McDaniel-Wilson, PE Oregon Department of Transportation Keith Blair,
More informationIII. Regional TSM&O Overview from the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (Jessica Josselyn, Kittelson & Associates, Inc.)
Regional Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (RTTAC) Transportation System Management & Operations (TSM&O) Subcommittee Meeting Agenda June 23, 2015 1:30 PM FDOT District Four Headquarters Auditorium
More informationGDOT-Office of Planning Update
GDOT-Office of Planning Update GAMPO Conference Athens, Georgia Matthew Fowler, PTP Assistant Planning Administrator November 30, 2010 AGENDA Atlanta Region Managed Lane System Plan I-85 HOV to HOT Conversion
More informationMEMORANDUM. January 30, 2014
MEMORANDUM January 30, 2014 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CMAQ Working Group RTC of Southern Nevada (RTC) FFY 2015-2019 CMAQ Program CMAQ Program Information Please reference the most recent Interim Program Guidance
More informationOperations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations
Operations in the 21st Century DOT Meeting Customers Needs and Expectations 1 Purpose of this Meeting: Share Thoughts & Discuss Challenges brought about by the changing transportation environment and public
More informationMAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports
MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports September 20, 2012 American Association of Port Authorities 703.684.5700 www.aapa-ports.org 3 New Freight Eligibility in Core Highway Formula Programs Surface Transportation
More informationDatabase and Travel Demand Model
Database and Travel Demand Model 7 The CMP legislation requires every CMA, in consultation with the regional transportation planning agency (the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in the Bay
More informationUsing INRIX Data in Iowa. Kyle Barichello, Iowa DOT Skylar Knickerbocker, InTrans
Using INRIX Data in Iowa Kyle Barichello, Iowa DOT Skylar Knickerbocker, InTrans What is probe data? What is INRIX data? INRIX Data Overview Purchased traffic data Covers Interstates, State Highway, some
More informationAppendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY
Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY 2014 REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2014 RTP/SCS APPENDIX O SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
More informationEXHIBIT A. SCOPE OF SERVICES District-Wide Traffic Operations/Safety Studies (Work Group 6.1)
EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES District-Wide Traffic Operations/Safety Studies (Work Group 6.1) TABLE OF CONTENTS OBJECTIVE... 1 SERVICES... 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT... 1 SCHEDULE/STATUS REPORTS... 2 MEETINGS...
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; ESTABLISHING A UNIFORM METHODOLOGY FOR MULTIMODAL MOBILITY ANALYSES ; AND
More informationPerformance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1
Performance Measures for Transportation Planning Part 1 Flint, MI July 12, 2011 Brian Betlyon FHWA Resource Center Overview Performance Measurement in Transportation Planning Module Outcomes Describe performance
More informationCongestion Management Process. Procedures and Responsibilities Report
Congestion Management Process Procedures and Responsibilities Report Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization June 2011 The Congestion Management Process Procedures and Responsibilities
More informationMONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE
12 MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE The FAST Act continues the legislation authorized under MAP-21, which created a data-driven, performance-based multimodal program to address the many challenges
More informationCongestion Management Process 2013 Update
OVERVIEW OF THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS Traffic Congestion In The Dallas-Fort Worth Region With the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) urban area as its center, the North Central Texas region
More informationTraffic Study Guidelines
Traffic Study Guidelines March 2015 Manatee County Public Works Transportation Planning Division 1022 26 th Avenue East Bradenton, FL 34208 Phone: (941) 708-7450 Fax: (941) 708-7503 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FLORIDA INTRASTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM Topic No.: 525-030-250-f Office: Systems Planning Effective Date: May 16, 2002 DEVELOPMENT OF THE FLORIDA
More informationTRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Development and Management of Sustainable Information Portals. Wednesday, May 2, :00-2:30 PM ET
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD Development and Management of Sustainable Information Portals Wednesday, May 2, 2018 1:00-2:30 PM ET The Transportation Research Board has met the standards and requirements
More informationTravel Time Reliability in the SLOCOG Region. October 27, 2014 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Transportation Education Series
Travel Time Reliability in the SLOCOG Region October 27, 2014 San Luis Obispo Council of Governments Transportation Education Series 1 Transportation Education Series - Agenda Grab Some Free Lunch!! Introductions
More informationCHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES
CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES 4.0 INTRODUCTION The ability to accommodate high volumes of intersecting traffic safely and efficiently through the arrangement of one or more interconnecting
More informationAir Quality Technical Report PM2.5 Quantitative Hot spot Analysis. A. Introduction. B. Interagency Consultation
Air Quality Technical Report PM2.5 Quantitative Hot spot Analysis I 65, SR44 to Southport Road (Segmented from SR44 to Main Street and Main Street to Southport Road) A. Introduction This technical report
More informationFreight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar. January 7, 2014
Freight and Rail Stakeholder Webinar January 7, 2014 Agenda Modal Needs Baseline Revenue Modal Scenarios Website Statewide Freight Plan Statewide Rail Plan Jeff Carroll MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
More informationUSER BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR HIGHWAYS MANUAL
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials USER BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR HIGHWAYS MANUAL August 2003 Copyright 2003, by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
More informationNCHRP PROJECT : ESTIMATING THE LIFE-CYCLE COST OF INTERSECTION DESIGNS. Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
NCHRP PROJECT 03-110: ESTIMATING THE LIFE-CYCLE COST OF INTERSECTION DESIGNS Kittelson & Associates, Inc. NCHRP Project 03-110 2 Project Objective and Overview Principles of Life-Cycle Cost Estimation
More information