Ed.D. in Executive Leadership

Transcription

1 Office of Graduate Admissions 3690 East Avenue, Rochester, New York (585) (phone) (585) (fax) TO THE APPLICANT: Ed.D. in Executive Leadership Applicant Employment History, Supervisor s Performance Appraisal and Recommendation Complete the section below and provide your recommendation writer with a stamped, self-addressed envelope. Applicant Name LAST FIRST MIDDLE In accordance with federal regulations, materials in student files, such as recommendation forms, are open to inspection upon request, unless the student has waived the right of access in advance. Please indicate your wish by completing and signing the statement below. Your right to review this form is considered waived if you do not check a response. I (check one) q DO q DO NOT waive access to this recommendation. Applicant s Signature Date Applicant s Address STREET CITY STATE/PROVINCE ZIP/POSTAL CODE COUNTRY TO THE SUPERVISOR This form should be returned in the envelope provided by the applicant; please seal it and sign across the seal. The applicant will forward the recommendation unopened to the Office of Graduate Admissions with his/her other application materials. We are aware of the time and care necessary to prepare this evaluation and gratefully acknowledge your assistance. Name of individual completing this form Signature Date Position/Title Organization/Institution Address STREET CITY STATE/PROVINCE ZIP/POSTAL CODE COUNTRY Daytime Telephone Fax

2 APPLICANT S EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 1. How long have you known the applicant? years 2. How long has the applicant been employed by your organization? years 3. How long has the applicant served in an administrative/management capacity in your organization? years 4. How many years have you supervised the applicant? years APPLICANT S PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Context: The Ed.D. in Executive Leadership seeks to prepare leaders who are: Ethically responsible and committed to improving conditions, opportunities, and outcomes for their clients and employees. Capable of using research, best practices, and the new technologies to guide change and improve individual and organizational performance. Confident and compassionate, and committed to improving the quality of life for children and families in underserved communities. Prepare socially conscious and morally grounded leaders who respect and embrace diversity, and understand the importance of human resource development. These expectations and desired outcomes are reflected in the program s mission statement, and are consistent with the standards and requirements that support the doctoral program. To this end, the following performance appraisal framework is an important aspect of the admissions process. It is used to assist the program faculty in determining the applicant s readiness and potential to meet the demands of a rigorous doctoral level program. DIRECTIONS Please review and apply the following performance categories accordingly based on your experience with the applicant. Virtually all elements of the applicant s assignments and projects were accomplished in an exceptional manner. He or she has demonstrated the willingness and ability to consistently go well beyond the assigned responsibilities. Consistently productive in meeting his or her assigned responsibilities. In general, all ongoing responsibilities have been concluded and performed successfully. This is a level of performance that is not completely satisfactory. Specific ongoing responsibilities have been unfulfilled, incomplete, or not met in a timely and/or acceptable manner. The applicant does not always work diligently or produce sufficiently on a consistent basis. This is a level of performance that is substantially below expectations. Key and/or basic responsibilities are not met and without good cause. In cases where information is not available, the area does not apply or there is no opportunity to observe the characteristics. Ed.D. PROGRAM APPLICANT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Please rate each element by placing a check (3) in the appropriate box and commenting if necessary. Every effort should be made to keep the comments and evaluation summary specific and objective. The comments should help clarify the ratings and give specific meaning or emphasis in individual cases.

3 Category 1 Leadership Demonstrates a commitment to high standards of professionalism and performance. Contributes to the achievement of the organization s vision and mission. Establishes clear goals, objectives and priorities, and seeks support to achieve desired outcomes. Makes sound and timely decisions drawing on the best available information. Makes oral and written presentations that are clear, understandable, and seek buy-in. Demonstrates an understanding of his/her role in the organization and shows evidence of growth. Additional comments on Leadership ratings: Category 2 Organizational Management Analyzes data from a variety of sources to facilitate problem solving and decision making. Organizes information in a rational manner to support achievement of outcomes and timelines. Applies knowledge and skills appropriately to support accomplishment of the organization s mission, goals and objectives. Plans and schedules work so that resources are used efficiently and effectively. Seeks to enhance knowledge and improve skills of self and others. Additional comments on Organizational Management ratings:

4 Category 3 Engagement and Communication Seeks to engage staff and others, and facilitates open communication Interacts effectively with individuals and groups from diverse backgrounds, and embraces multiple perspectives. Enlists participation and support from a variety of internal and external stakeholders. Promotes connections with the community. Follows organizational protocols, policies and procedures, and laws and regulations. Additional comments on Engagement and Communication ratings: Category 4 Ethics Demonstrates compassion and respect for the rights of others. Demonstrates impartiality and sensitivity to diversity and fairness in decision making. Makes and supports decisions based on high ethical and moral principles. Additional comments on Ethics ratings: OVERALL RATING q q q s q OVERALL RECOMMENDATION FOR PROGRAM q Strongly Recommend q Recommend q Recommend with Reservation q Do Recommend

5 Supervisor Recommendation Form Please compare the applicant with others you have known during your professional career. For each of the categories below, check the appropriate box. Leadership potential Analytical ability Quantitative ability Research ability Command of field of study Written English Oral English Interpersonal skills Maturity Self-confidence Motivation Initiative Creativity/originality Results-orientation knowledge disposition INADEQUATE ABOVE BELOW OPPORTUNITY EXCELLENT AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE TO OBSERVE ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS Please address the following questions. 1. What do you consider the applicant s most outstanding talents or characteristics? 2. What are the applicant s chief liabilities or weaknesses? 3. The admissions committee would appreciate any additional statement you may wish to make concerning the applicant s aptitude for advanced study or his/her potential for becoming a successful manager and leader, if appropriate.