What is the Interim Deployment Programme (IDP)?

Transcription

1 What is the Interim Deployment Programme (IDP)? SESA enabler; A route from 'now 'til then'; Managed by the IDSG; Operational use of an ET; 'Lifed', and funded by Commission 7 Activity Areas; Will produce 2 x IDP Execution eports; Transport Commission slide Message from Stu Wain (EC) QUOTE Apologises for not being present. I have been diverted to issues on a fixed timeline, actually I'm responding to DG EUOCONTOL's pus on Central Services, so looking at financing routes. The slides with what I wanted to say were passed to Danny and Ana Paula. The sentiment is clear. We see ESSIP/LSSIP as becoming more clearly aligned with SES eporting needs for the Commission, and IDP for SESA Baseline. We acknowledge that, for a limited period, there may appear to be some overlap (IDP and LSSIP) in reporting - yet there are good reasons for needing to know longer term plans under ESSIP/LSSIP, and shorter term accuracy requried for IDP handover to the Deployment Manager UNQUOTE 1

2 IDP 0_Management 1_Collaborative Flight Planning and Demand and Capacity balancing tools 2_Airspace Management Improvements and Data sharing 3_Airport CDM 4_Air Ground Datalink 5_Automated assistance to controllers for seamless coord., transfer and dialogue 6_NP Approach 7_CDO/CCO Application WP1.0 WP2.0 WP3.0 WP4.0 WP 5.0 WP6.0 WP7.0 WP1.1 AFP automatically generated WP2.1 olling ASM/ ATFCM processes WP3.1 A CDM Local Deployment (airport n) WP4.1 Technological update WP 5.1 OLDI migration from x.25 to IP WP 6.1 APV national deployment WP 7.1 CDO Local deployment WP1.2 STAM Phase 1 WP2.2 CD optimization WP3.2 A CDM Network Integration WP4.2 Operational activities WP 5.2 Complementary OLDI messages WP 6.2 APV local deployment WP 7.2 CCO Local deployment WP2.3 Free outes WP4.3 Transversal activities WP 6.3 NAV AU activities WP2.4 Migration of military organisations to EAD Transport Commission slide 2

3 The IDSG Interim Deployment Steering Group 'The IDSG is the transitional arrangement to steer the implementation of short term essential SESA deployments identified as critical to performance and to achieve early benefits at European level.'* 'The IDSG shall develop, maintain and execute an Interim Deployment Programme that will be derived from, and kept consistent with, the European ATM MP.'* 'The IDSG shall ensure the commitment of ATM operational stakeholders (ANSPs, AUs and Airports) on these implementation activities through the adoption of the IDP by the IDSG'.* * = From IDSG op s dated 29 Feb 2012 Transport op ules of Procedures Commission slide 3

4 in what timescale? IDP was established Feb 2012 and is a forerunner to (and model for) the (P)CP; PCP is established around the DM; DM will be 'in-place' by Q and will have established the DP; The DP will be cognisant of the successes (and failures) of the IDP; When the DM is active, and the DP is in-train, the IDP will wind-down, probably by mid Transport Commission slide 4

5 So IDP is about 'laying the ground' for full SESA deployment'; LSSIP monitors general progress towards improved technology ; iaw ATM MP, (P)CP/DP will deploy some SESA elements maturing in the window and requiring synchronised implementation. LSSIP is an official input to ATM MP maintenance and complements Commission and SESA tools! Accuracy (of information provision) is the key! Transport Commission slide 5

6 LSSIP Kick off Event Sep 2013 Item 4 - IDP Developments Ana Paula FANGOLHO 6

7 IDP Status Current version Activity areas with 3 levels WP, swp and task Alignment with ESSIP objectives: Activity Description Number 1 Collaborative Flight Planning and Demand/Capacity Balancing Tools 2 Airspace Management Improvements and Data sharing Priority eference FCM03 + DCB-0205 AOM19+AOM20+AOM Airport CDM AOP05 4 Air-Ground Data Link ITY-AGDL 5 Automated assistance to controllers for ITY-FMTP +ATC15+ATC17 seamless coordination, transfer and dialogue 6 NP approaches NAV10 7 CDO/CCO application ENV01+AOM0703 A new updated version (V4.0) expected end 2013 including: Improved description of activities Updated alignment with ESSIP Plan 2013 to include new and modified objectives: AOM21, FCM04, FCM05 and FCM03, AOM19 Introduction of intermediary milestones to facilitate a harmonized assessment of progress performance considerations Item 4 -IDP Developments 7 During the development of the Interim Deployment Programme it was taken into account those ESSIP objectives considered as essential and requiring priority of implementation. Seven Activity Areas (AA) were identified and they are linked to the ESSIP objectives and OI as indicated in the table. Each of these 7 AA are further decomposed in 3 levels of detail WP, swp and Task. The current and approved version of the IDP is version 3.1 anew version is expected by the end of the year with improved description of tasks, introduction of intermediary milestones to harmonise progress reporting. Performance considerations and assessment will also be included. 7

8 IDP OGANISATION AND TASKS Management Support Maintain/update IDP Prepare and consolidate reports and monitor progress Propose recommendations Multi-stakeholder coordination eport to IDSG AA Activity Area IDSG ET AA Coord. Steer IDP Programme eport to the EC manager Issue recommendations: to Expert Team to other bodies (EC, NM) to stakeholders Propose enhancements of IDP Prepare data for monitoring progress Identify/escalate progress issues eport to ET isk management Execute WPs Inter-stakeholder coordination Indentify local projects and relevant common milestones Establish IDP/projects interface Translate project into IDP reporting Item 4 -IDP Developments 8 To better manage the execution of the IDP an organisation structure was approved and implemented. The Interim Deployment Steering Group is the main body in charge of steering the programme, reporting to EC and issuing recommendations. The Expert Team reports to the IDSG and is responsible for IDP management activities such as maintaining and update the IDP, prepare and consolidate reports, propose recommendations to IDSG, etc For each Activity Area there is one or 2 coordinators that work directly in contact with the local projects and report to ET their activities. 8

9 Execution of the IDP The IDP was approved at SSC 48 (Dec 2012) and the execution phase started Monitoring and reporting (TO - art. 1.3, 2.6, 2.7 and 5) eality based Collecting deployment data Provide clear warnings EC letter (29/10/2012) to IDSG's chairman: " [ ] the Commission would like to draw IDSG's attention on the need to optimise stakeholders' and States' reporting efforts as IDSG's monitoring exercises could to some extend overlap with LSSIP reporting exercise. It is hoped that the participation of DSS/EIP's unit to the IDSG would facilitate this optimisation". Needs and expectations Optimise reporting effort by using/adapting existing available tools A single dataset/database Unique source of reference data accessible by all stakeholders Avoid duplication/redundancies Item 4 -IDP Developments 9 One important activity for the execution of the IDP is related to monitoring and reporting the implementation progress. The IDSG Terms of eference mention explicitly it reality based and provision of clear warnings/recommendations. In a letter to the IDSG the EC stressed the need to optimise reporting effort by using/adapting existing (LSSIP) processes and tools. Duplication should be avoided and a unique source of reference available to all stakeholders. 9

10 1_Collaborative Flight Planning and Demand and Capacity balancing to ols WP 1.1 AFP automatically generatswp Modification to FDP for ACheck of the correctness of received AFP (blank) End 2012 End 2012 Green Orange ed End 2013 End 2012 ed End 2014 End 2012 ed End 2015 End 2012 ed Provide AFP message for change of Airc raft Equipmen Albania End 2012 End 2012 Green Armenia End 2015 End 2012 ed Austria End 2012 End 2012 Green Azerbaidjan End 2014 End 2012 ed Belgium End 2013 End 2012 ed Bosnia and HerzegovinaEnd 2013 End 2012 ed Bulgaria End 2012 End 2012 ed End 2013 End 2012 ed Croatia End 2014 End 2012 ed Cyprus End 2014 End 2012 ed Czech epublic End 2012 End 2012 ed End 2013 End 2012 ed Denmark End 2012 End 2012 Orange Estonia End 2013 End 2012 ed Eurocontrol End 2012 End 2012 Orange Finland End 2013 End 2012 ed France End 2013 End 2012 ed FYOM End 2015 End 2012 ed Germany End 2012 End 2012 Orange Greece End 2012 End 2012 Green Hungary End 2013 End 2012 ed Ireland End 2012 End 2012 ed End 2013 End 2012 ed Italy End 2013 End 2012 ed Latvia End 2013 End 2012 ed Lithuania End 2012 End 2012 Green Malta End 2012 End 2012 Green End 2014 End 2012 ed Moldova End 2014 End 2012 ed INTEGATED MONITOING PACKAGE Charts Maps Master Plan ESSIP IDP v3.1 NSP Planning reference Programme reference LSSIP DB Full IDP dataset Ad hoc excel eports Gantt Charts Data interface, integrating information from all inputs To Expert Team To AA Coordinators To Stakeholders ANSP Input Other Stakeholders Input (Coordinators) Item 4 -IDP Developments 10 Following EC recommendation for optimisation of resources, EUOCONTOL made a development, in a short period of time, to set up a full IDP dataset using the existing infrastructure of the LSSIP database Integrated Monitoring package. 10

11 LSSIP/IDP monitoring ECTL performed the development of the IDP monitoring tool in a very short time using the LSSIP database. Started in January 2013 and was ready by March 2013 Available for the IDP second monitoring cycle eplicates the IDP programme at 3 levels WP, SWP and Task Includes two views: Organisational view Horizontal view And soon a FAB view --- we are working on this improvement Allows the generation of excel reports and gantt charts Item 4 -IDP Developments 11 Monitoring cycles dates addressed at slide

12 IDP Monitoring Tool/repository Item 4 -IDP Developments 12 HMI of the IDP monitoring tool 12

13 ACCESS IGHTS eading: Members and observers to IDSG and IDSG/ET The coordinators Other ATM stakeholders Writing Each organization has exclusive writing right for its data and they provide the nominations of their contributors Currently: eading access rights about 167 Writing access rights about 47 LSSIP FP are encouraged to ask for IDP reading access rights Send an to: Item 4 -IDP Developments 13 13

14 Monitoring Cycles IDP - 3 monitoring cycles completed eference date 31 Dec 2012 eference date 1 st March 2013 cut off 12 April eference date 01 July 2013 cut off date 10 Sept 2013 All data from the 3 monitoring cycles available in the IDP database ANSPs data is gathered and validated by their monitoring process and uploaded into the database Coordinators input the data for the other stakeholders LSSIP Year 2013 reference date Dec 2013 LSSIP Year 2013 cut off date February 2014 Item 4 -IDP Developments 14 Three monitoring cycles were completed in the indicated dates. All data is available in the IDP database. 14

15 IDP Execution progress report eflects for each monitoring cycle the updated state of play for the implementation of the IDP Status assessment for each of the 7 Activity Areas Against the planning reference (ESSIP) and the project reference (IDP V 3.1) IDP ecommendations proposed to EC 0_Management Presented at SSC 1_Collaborative Flight Planning and Demand and Capacity balancing tools 2_Airspace Management Improvements and Data sharing 3_Airport CDM 4_Air Ground Datalink 5_Automated assistance to controllers for seamless coord., transfer and dialogue 6_NP Approach 7_CDO/CCO Application WP1.0 WP2.0 WP3.0 WP4.0 WP 5.0 WP6.0 WP7.0 ecommendations available WP1.1 AFP automatically generated WP1.2 STAM Phase 1 WP2.1 olling ASM/ ATFCM processes WP2.2 CD optimization WP3.1 A CDM Local Deployment (airport n) WP3.2 A CDM Network Integration WP4.1 Technological update WP4.2 Operational activities WP 5.1 OLDI migration from x.25 to IP WP 5.2 Complementary OLDI messages WP 6.1 APV national deployment WP 6.2 APV local deployment WP 7.1 CDO Local deployment WP 7.2 CCO Local deployment Grey: under assessment Green: done or on-going/planned according to IDP Orange: on-going/planned, some risks identified ed: target date missed or major risks identified WP2.3 Free outes WP2.4 Migration of military organisations to EAD WP4.3 Transversal activities WP 6.3 NAV AU activities Item 4 -IDP Developments 15 Two types of target reference dates: Planning reference is the European ATM Master Plan level 3 (ESSIP implementation view as of 2012) and the Network Strategy Plan. epresented by a TIANGLE The project reference is the baseline established for geographical applicability and timing as per the IDP version 3.1- Annex 1. epresented by a CICLE The picture indicates the implementation status from the previous monitoring cycle ended last April (2013) 15

16 IDP Tool and LSSIP eporting Consistency of data Many activities are common to IDP and LSSIP: In the LSSIP database IDP activities are flagged The IDP tool also indicates the link with ESSIP objectives Consistency of data reported for both, the IDP and LSSIP, is very important - please cross check: National Stakeholders are recommended to undertake internal coordination and take into account the existing LSSIP process by involving LSSIP Focal Points Item 4 -IDP Developments 16 LSSIP Focal Points are recommended to coordinate the IDP and LSSIP reporting inside their organisations to ensure consistency of monitoring data. 16

17 Thanks for your attention! Item 4 -IDP Developments 17 Question: DK: To my knowledge the IDP will end mid Could you confirm? eply Ana Paula Frangolho: The last information we had is that IDP will extend up to the moment where the SESA Deployment Manager will be in place so in principle IDP will end first quarter 2015 as indicated in the slide from the Commission. Question: UA: Will we have the same database for LSSIP and IDP? eply Oscar Alfaro: IDP and LSSIP are not exactly the same. If you are not involved in the IDP, the LSSIP will not change. Both environments are together but they have different access rights. 17