6/25/2018. Year 2 Evaluation Planning June 25, Evaluation Progress

Transcription

1 Year 2 Planning June 25, 2018 Progress 1

2 Year 1: Major Activities Process Recidivism and Needs & Cost Analysis Program Level : Data Collection Process Development November April 2018 June 2018 July 2018 I Year 2 Scope 2

3 Overview Phase 1:..:-.: Phase 5: Leadership Custody and Interviews... Community... Program-Level Foundational Assessment Process Program Specific Outcomes. Phase 1: Leadership Interviews Objectives: Gauge CCP perspectives c Experiences with Year 1 evaluation: what worked well, lessons learned, and what could be improved c How findings and recommendations from Year 1 evaluation can be utilized c Expectations and priorities for Year 2 evaluation c Preferred use of discretionary evaluation funds Method: c Phone interviews with CCP members 3

4 Phase 2: Probation Supervision Process Objectives: Examine services for AB l 09 and non-ab l 09 probationers c Use of best-practices, including EPICS c Caseloads and case management c Referrals for programs and services c Use of compliance checks and flash incarcerations Methods: c Qualitative interviews and focus groups with: Probation leadership Probation supervisors and DPOs Individuals under probation supervision c Quantitative analysis of EBP fidelity records, caseload, and meetings between DPOs and clients Phase 3: Recidivism Analysis Objectives: Examine recidivism outcomes for AB 1 09 population and address limitations from Year 1 Cl Controlling for individual factors IJ Examine longer term (2-year) recidivism rates IJ Utilize 730 day follow-up period controlling for time spent in custody IJ Addition of 1 l 70(h) jail-only recidivism outcomes Methods: c Quantitative analysis of criminal histories for MS, PRCS, and 1 l 70(h) jail only individuals 4

5 Phase 4: DRC Outcome Objectives: Examine impact of DRC programs Cl Recidivism outcomes Cl Program-specific outcomes Methods: Cl Quantitative analysis for MS, PRCS, and felony probation populations Phase 5: Custody and Community Program-Level Objectives: Process and outcome evaluations for selected AB 109-funded programs for in-custody and community supervised population c RDA will support evaluation planning and readiness IJ Selection of programs to be evaluated by Steering Committee and CCP Methods: IJ Qualitative interviews and focus groups with: Program leadership Provider line staff Individuals receiving programs and services IJ Quantitative analysis of service utilization, assessed needs, enrollment and completion, and service completion outcomes 5

6 Year 2 Timeline Phase 1: Leadership Interviews Phase 2: Probation Supervision Process Phase 3: Recidivism Analysis Phase 4: DRC Outcome Phase 5: Custody and Community Program- Level August 2018 November 2018 January 2019 January 2019 May 2019 Summary of Cost Phase Phase 1: Leadership Interviews Phase 2: Probation Supervision Process Phase 3: Recidivism Analysis Phase 4: DRC Outcome Cost $10,500 $35,775 $44,150 $30,350 Phase 5: Program Level Process and Outcome s Individual Program-Level s (per evaluation) Aggregate Activities $35,900 $22,750 6

7 Questions and Discussion Questions and Discussion Do these activities align with what you would like to achieve in Year 2 of this evaluation? ll Are there areas of inquiry that are missing? Which of this activities do you consider to be the highest priority? Which are the lowest? For the Program-Level Process and Outcome s (Phase 5), which programs are the highest priorities for evaluation as part of Year 2? 7

8 Contact Information Rajni Banthia, PhD Senior Project Manager Audrey Clubb, PhD Research Associate 8