PROPOSAL EVALUATION WORKSHEET (Individual) EVALUATION FACTOR: SECURITY, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE (RATED)

Transcription

1 PROPOSER: MBCR DATE: 8/21/13 RATING: NARRATIVE SUMMARY: The proposal outlines all required elements as indicated on the worksheet. Objective: The following are the objectives for the Security, Emergency Preparedness and Emergency Response evaluation factor: 1) To ensure that Proposers have clearly defined roles for security and emergency preparedness and emergency response and have plans demonstrating accountability for the security of the system; and 2) To ensure that Proposers have a plan and processes designed to ensure full compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations throughout their performance. Evaluation Criteria: The Proposer has clearly defined roles for security and emergency preparedness and response and has set forth its plan detailing its accountability for the security of the system, in full compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Instructions: Evaluators must rate each requirement outlined in the table below as one of the following: (i) Exceptional; (ii) Good; (iii) ; (iv) Potential to Become ; or (v) Unacceptable. Please note the following explanations when rating each requirement: 1

2 1) A rating of Exceptional is appropriate when the Proposer has demonstrated an approach that is considered to significantly exceed stated criteria in a way that is beneficial to the. This rating indicates a consistently outstanding level of quality, with very little or no risk that this Proposer would fail to meet the requirements of the solicitation. There are no weaknesses. 2) A rating of Good is appropriate when the Proposer has demonstrated an approach that is considered to exceed stated criteria. This rating indicates a generally better than acceptable quality, with little risk that this Proposer would fail to meet the requirements of the solicitation. Weaknesses, if any, are very minor. Correction of the weaknesses would not be necessary before the Proposal would be considered further. 3) A rating of is appropriate if the Proposer has demonstrated an approach that is considered to meet the stated criteria. This rating indicates an acceptable level of quality. The Proposal demonstrates a reasonable probability of success. Weaknesses exist but can be readily corrected through requests for Clarification or Communications. 4) A rating of Potential to Become is appropriate if the Proposer has demonstrated an approach that fails to meet stated criteria as there are weaknesses, but they are susceptible to correction through Discussions. The response is considered marginal in terms of the basic content and/or amount of information provided for evaluation, but overall the Proposer is capable of providing an acceptable or better Proposal. 5) A rating of Unacceptable is appropriate if the Proposer has demonstrated an approach that indicates significant weaknesses and/or unacceptable quality. The Proposal fails to meet the stated criteria and/or lacks essential information and is conflicting and/or unproductive. There is no reasonable likelihood of success; weaknesses are so major and/or extensive that a major revision to the Proposal would be necessary. s for each requirement must be recorded in the associated column, and a detailed explanation of why a particular rating was given to a requirement must be recorded in the associated Comments/Justification for column. The column identifies relevant sections of (Operations and Management Proposal Instructions) to the Instructions to Proposers. 2

3 1. B4.2(A) The Proposer shall prepare a draft Operator System Security Compliance Plan ("OSSCP"), which must be developed in accordance with the 's System Security Plan and Sensitive Security Information guidelines and procedures and applicable federal and other legal requirements, regulations, and standards. The draft OSSCP and the draft Safety Plan must work collaboratively, integrating overlapping safety and security concerns. Additionally, the draft OSSCP must also address the following items: Comments/Justification for Proposal gives a good outline, definitions of guidelines and procedures for their OSSCP plan. s are referenced and in compliance as outlined in the 's Security Plan. 1) The policies, goals, and objectives for the security program endorsed by the 's General Manager; Consistent coordination\collaboration with Police. Only references MBCR General Manager Statement. 2) The Proposer's process for managing threats and vulnerabilities during operations; References and gives good definition of the National Threat Assessment. 3) Controls in place that address the personal security of customers and operating personnel; 4) The Proposer's process for conducing Speaks of employee involvement to promote a security culture. References Customer outreach, gives good definition and also provides resources to aid with compliance.

4 internal security reviews to evaluate compliance and measure the effectiveness of the OSSCP; and 5) The process for review and approval of the OSSCP, and any accompanying procedures, by the and other oversight agencies. The OSSCP must address the requirements set forth in 3 (System Security Plan) of Schedule 3.5 (Safety and Security) to the Operating Agreement. Comments/Justification for Generally covered in each individual are of duties and responsibilities. Speaks of the development and monitoring of policies and procedures to ensure compliance. Gives reference of process in section 3-13 Evaluation and Modification of the OSSCP uses reference as a Living Document as well as collaboration with police for compliance. Proposal generally covers required System Safety Plan. 2. B4.2(B) The Proposer shall develop a draft Emergency Preparedness Plan ("EPP"), which shall comply with FRA and Homeland Security Exercise Education Program requirements. The draft EPP shall set forth the Proposer's emergency preparedness policies, procedures, and programs, including full scale Emergency Drills, and must comply with the requirements set forth in 4 (Emergency Preparedness Plan) of Schedule 3.5 (Safety and Security) to the Operating Agreement. s met in proposal. Gives good descriptions and detailed/outlined areas of responsibility. Speaks of drills in collaboration with MBCR and Amtrak. Reference of customers requiring ADA accommodations.

5 3. 4. B4.2(C) B4.2(D) The Proposer shall submit a draft Emergency Response Plan ("ERP"), in accordance with 5 (Emergency Response Plan) of Schedule 3.5 (Safety and Security) to the Operating Agreement. The draft ERP shall address major storms and other natural occurrences that could disrupt Commuter Rail Services, as well as any other incidents or events that would require services of emergency response agencies. The Proposer shall: (i) identify those portions of the information that it provided in response to B4.2(A) through B4.2(C) of that it considers to be innovative, best practice, beneficial to Customers and/or cost efficient, and (ii) submit information supporting or otherwise validating its position that said portions are innovative, best practice, beneficial to Customers and/or cost efficient. Comments/Justification for Well defined outline plan that references major storms, disasters catastrophic events. Does not reference contingency plan or COOP s generally outlined throughout the proposal. Evaluator#ll # vl