Palatine, Illinois Processing and Distribution Center (P&DC) into Carol Stream, Illinois P&DC.

Transcription

1 February 2, 2010 Mr. William Burrus President American Postal Workers Union (APWU), AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC Sent by Fax and Certified Mail # Fax: (202) Dear Bill: This is to inform you of the Postal Service's decision to consolidate all originating mail processing operations at the following Great Lakes Area location: Palatine, Illinois Processing and Distribution Center (P&DC) into Carol Stream, Illinois P&DC. After review, it was decided that this consolidation was in the best interest of the Postal Service. Implementation of this AMP is expected to be completed by March Enclosed, per your request is a copy of the completed study. The Postal Service must continually look to improve productivity and increase efficiency while maintaining excellent service. The decline in mail volume and revenues due to the economic downturn has only heightened the need for such improvements. This consolidation will allow us to accomplish this goal by making better use of excess space, staffing, and equipment, and to process mail more efficiently. It is projected that this consolidation will result in significant savings for the Postal Service. Some affected career employees may be reassigned to the gaining facility or to other vacant positions. Reassignments will be made in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement. If you have questions, or need additional information, please contact Ron Scott at (202) Sincerely, John W. Dockins Manager Contract Administration Enclosure (CA )

2 ,. Losing {:acilify Information Type of Distribution to Consolidate: Facility Name & Type: Street Address: City: State: 50 Facility ZIP Code:; District: Area: Finance Number:' Current 3D ZIP Code(s): Miles to Gaining Facility:! EXFC office: Plant Manager: Senior Plant Manager: District Manager: Facility Type after AMP: 12. tialninglfacility Information Facility Name & Type: Street Address: City: State: 50 Facility ZIP Code: District: Area: Finance Number: Current 3D ZIP Code(s): EXFC office: Plant Manager: Senior Plant Manager: District Manager: /3. Background Information Originating Palatine P&DC 1300 E Northwest Hwy Palatine IL Northern Illinois Great Lakes , miles Yes Gregory W. Johnson Robert A. Hart Post Office Carol Stream P&DC 500 Fullerton Ave Carol Stream IL Northern Illinois Great Lakes ,603 Yes Lee A. Thompson Robert A. Hart MODSIBPI Office Start of Study: 06/01/09 Date Range of Data: Apr : Mar Processing Days per Year: 310 Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,750 EAS Hours per Year: 1,825 Date of HQ memo, DAR Factors/Cost ofborrowing/ New May 27,2009 Facility Start-up Costs Update / ! Date & Time this workbook was last saved: 1/25/ :11 /4. Other Ihformation Area Vice President: Senior Vice President, Operations:' Area AMP Coordinator:' HQ AMP Coordinator: Jo Ann Feindt Steven J. Forte Nancy Schoenbeck Jamie Gallagher rev 01/15/2009 Package Page 1 AMP Data Entry Page

3 Approval Signatures systems. including financial reports and those rc;tatjng to compliance of funds. as well as all systems to service to our customers. postal reporting expenditure!,osing facii'([xl Postmaster or Plant Manager: o Senior Plant Manager: District Manager: I - ~lngeacii,i[xl Plant Manager: Senior Plant Manager: Pnnted Name District Manager: Pnnted Name J Area Vice President: Approved: Senior Vice President O~leratlons: 2 AMP ACiDrOV:31 <::;,.,.,.",. "",

4 Losing Facility Name and Type: Palatine P&DC Executive Summary Last Saved January 25,2010 Street Address: 1300 E Northwest Hwy City, Slate: Palatine, IL Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 600, 602 Type of Distribution to Consolidate: Originating Miles to Gaining Facility: 18 miles Gaining Facility Name and Type: Carol Stream P&DC Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 601, 603 Savings/Costs Mail Processing Craft Workhour Savings = $9,102,290 from Workhour Costs - Proposed ----_.:.. PCES/EAS Supervisory Workhour Savings = $594,764 from OtherCurr VS Prop Transportation Savings = ($996,166) from Transpor1ation(HCRandPVSj Non-MP CraftJEAS + Shared LDCs Workhour Savings (less MaintlTrans) = (SO) from Other Curr vs Prop Maintenance Savings = $766,722 from Maintenance Space Savings = $0 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs Total Annual Savings = $9,467,610 Total One-Time Costs = $2,057,855 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs Staffing Positions Total First Year Savings = $7,409,755 =.,,;.;.~~;... Craft Position Loss =.:..13::.;0:..- o PCES/EAS Position Loss = ---"---- from Staffing - Craft from Staffing - PCESIEAS Volume Service Total FHP to be Transferred (Average Daily Volume) = 1,210,628 from Workhour Costs - Current Current FHP at Gaining Facility (Average Daily Volume) = 5,494,915 from Workhour Costs - Current Losing Facility Cancellation Volume (Average Daily Volume) = 607,626 (= Total TPH 1Operating Days) Unchanged. Unchanged + Service Standard Impacts UPGRADED DOWNGRADED Upgrades Upgrade. byadv ADV ADV ADV % First-Class Mail 0 0 4,200, % Priority Mail , % Package Services 850 1,201 24, % Periodicals tic 1\' (\la' i'~,a ~ N;A,~ Standard Mail i\tif\ Nil\ ' r'" ~, r"'<,, Nl,~' rev 10/15/2009 Package Page 3 AMP Executive Summary

5 Summary Narrative Last Saved: January 25, 2010 Losing Facility Name and Type: Palatine P&DC Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 600,602 Type of Distribution to Consolidate: Originating Gaining Facility Name and Type: Carol Stream P&DC Current 3D ZIP Code s): 601,603 ck round: Northern IL Performance Cluster completed an Area Mail Processing (AMP) study to determine the feasibility of cating all originating mail processing and distribution operations from the Palatine IL Processing & Distribution Center (P&DC). The AMP would transfer mail processing operations for ZIP codes 600 and 602 into the Carol Stream P&DC. Since 2004, the Palatine P&DC has cancelled Carol Stream's as well as Rockford's originating letters and flats on Saturdays and some holidays. This volume and workhours shift is included in the AMP workbook mail processing base umber and resulting calculations. If the AMP is approved, Rockford's Saturday AMP will be done in Carol Stream. he Palatine P&DC is a postal owned facility. Along with processing operations, the multi-floor building houses administrative offices and a Business Mail Entry Unit (BMEU). Palatine P&DC serves as the AADC as well as the ADC for estinating mail to Rockford 1L. The Palatine plant is located approximately 18 miles northeast of the Carol Stream plant. Financial Summa: Financial savings proposed for this consolidation of originating operations are: Total First Year Savings Total Annual Savings $7,409,755 $9,467,610 he total first handled pieces (FHP) to be transferred (Average Daily Volume) is 1,210,628 pieces. ustomer Service Considerations: he FCM service standards for outgoing First Class Mail from Palatine P&DC and the Carol Stream P&DC are unchanged. he proposed AMP would not have any customer or service impacts on Priority Mail. The service standards for outgoing riority Mail from Palatine P&DC and the Carol Stream P&DC are unchanged. here will be a two hour change to the BMEU unit in Palatine as an earlier closing time will be necessary to clear all alatine originating Presort through Carol Stream. rans ortation Chan es: hirty-four (34) collection trips that normally arrive at Palatine after 18:00 will be redirected to go directly into Carol Stream. here will be no change to Associate Office collection leave times. Twenty-two (22) trips will arrive a Carol Stream after 19:20 CET with the latest trip arriving around 20:35. otal annual transportation cost is $996,166 of which a cost of $1,225,958 accounts for changes in Highway Contract outes (HCR) and a savings of $229,792 for changes to PVS and LDC34. PVS cost savings is due to change in cost per i1e rather than consolidation of workload. low adjustments totaling 2,244 annual workhours were made on two operations belonging to Carol Stream, IL: Operation 765 Operation 766 LDC34 Motor Vehicle Operators LDC34 Tractor Trailer Operators 262 workhours 1,982 workhours ix (6) emergency contract trips were removed from the HCR section of the workbook due to contractor default. Including hese trips would show inflated annual savings. Savings calculations on those trips were based on pre-emergency cost pe i1e. taftin 1m acts: ovement of mail will have an impact on staffing and will require movement of personnel. A total of 180 Function 1 FTE aft positions at the Palatine P&DC will be affected by implementation of the AMP with an increase of fifty-eight (58) FTE nction 1 craft positions at the Carol Stream P&DC. Function 3A in Palatine will not reduce as Carol Stream is the trolling PVS facility. There will be an extra PVS workhour cost in Carol Stream but no complement increase as these rs will be covered by existing personnel. rev 04/23/2009 PaCkage Page 4 AMP Summary Narrative

6 Summary Narrative (continued) Summary Narrative Page 2 Fourteen (14) FTE Function 38 positions at the Palatine P&DC will be impacted by the AMP. The Carol Stream P&DC would add six (6) FTE Function 38 positions due to support of the additional mail processing equipment. This is a net decrease of eight (8) FTE in Maintenance; however, we anticipate retaining these workhours in Palatine due to the expected future FSS Maintenance staffing need. The net change to all craft staffing is a reduction of 130 positions. The proposed AMP will also result in a decrease of EAS workhours in Palatine and the office will remain position neutral. There will be no increase in EAS positions in Carol Stream due to the current below target 1:22 supervisor to craft ratio. Due to shortages in current on-rolls staffing in Palatine, a new EAS staffing package will be submitted to the Area to get the office to efficient complement. This is outside the scope of this AMP. The Postal Service ensures that its standard practices comply with the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, where they may be applicable. Management and Craft Staffing Impads Craft 1 1,294 1, ,157 1, Mana ement Craft = FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals Mail Processing Management to Craft Ratio Palatine Carol Stream 1 : 36 1 : 29 1 : 29 1 : 23 1 : 26 1 : 23 1 : 28 1 : 24 1 Craft =FTR+PTR+PTF+Casuals 2 Craft =F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining rev 04/23/2009 Package Page 5 AMP Summary Narrative

7 Summary Narrative (continued) Summary Narrative Page 3 Equipment Relocation and Maintenance Impacts: Originating letter mail is cancelled in Palatine by seven (7) Advanced Facer Canceller Systems (AFCS) with an average daily volume of 607,626 pieces. Four (4) AFCS, two (2) BDS, four (4) VFS, one (1) DPRCS, two (2) DIOSS machines and three (3) DBCS-OSS machines (or kits) will be transferred from Palatine P&DC to the Carol Stream P&DC with a total relocation cost of $170,480. The Palatine P&DC will receive two (2) ClOSS machines from Carol Stream for consolidated PARS processing and DPS capacity replacement. This move is a District initiative to improve overall PARS processing. An added benefit for the facility is the additional DBCS capacity that will reduce turnaround time for the Palatine AMP mail. The three (3) remaining AFCS machines at the Palatine P&DC will be excessed. Total annual Maintenance savings is $766,722 of which $91,497 is attributed to parts and materials. AFCS Capacity I Collection Arrival Study for Carol Stream: The Average Daily Volume of cancellations to be transferred from Palatine to Carol Steam is 607,626 pieces. Local AFCS capacity and collection arrival studies indicate the need for ten (10) AFCS machines in Carol Stream to handle the additional volume. The number of machines is primarily due to the delayed collection mail arrival profile from the Palatine Associate Offices. In order to meet the mandated 24-Hr Clock clearance time of 21 :00 for Cancellations, 21 :30271 LOCAL CT and 0600 DPS dispatch, ten (10) AFCS machines will be needed for the last hourto 30 minutes of the cancellation operations. It is anticipated that 29% of Palatine's collection volume will arrive after Carol Stream's 19:20 CET. Facility Costs for Carol Stream: In order to accommodate the additional AFCS machines in the 010 area, a new non- integrated four position AFCS Loose Mail System has been included in the One-Time cost section of the AMP. The proposed cost of this system was obtained from HQ Engineering on January 14, Base Percentaqe Continqencv Total Enoineerino Desion (ESSl $3,000 0% $0 $3,000 Detail Design, Fabrication, & Installation (EFI) $848,400 5% $42,420 $890,820 (1) DPRC Controls Modifications $72,000 0% $0 $72,000 Eouipment Relocation & Demolition $169,900 5% $8,495 $178,395 VFS Modifications I $359,000 0% $0 $ Existino 010 LMS Controls Uporade $96,700 0% $0 $96,700 Installation Manaoement $37,000 0% $0 $37,000 Total I $1586,000 $50,915 $1636,915 This new 010 LMS will encroach on the area originally planned for future FSS operations. Therefore the proposal to move FSS #2 to Palatine has been requested and verbally approved. FSS Impacts: Carol Stream had been slotted for 2 FSS machines. The footprint of these machines and the allotted staging area impacts the 010, 020, and DIOSS staging areas. Also the expected increase in CASTRs required by the increase in routes to keep the machines full negate the ability of the facility to handle the floor space for both machines. An analysis has been done on both Carol Stream and Palatine and it has been decided by the District that it is in the best interest of the offices if the 2 M FSS is deployed to Palatine There is space available in the existing expansion and the machine will have plenty of staging and power in the area vacated by the old LMS system. A review of the building shows that costs to upgrade Palatine to take on this additional machine will be approximately $350K and transportation.,,' ~f~;cval of the deployment of the 2 nd FSS to Palatine will allow Carol Stream to effectively and efficiently run its 010 ration It will also allow the 2 DIOSS moved from Palatine to be able to be placed in line with the existing fleet and for ntinued adequate staging of mail for automation as well as the new FSS that will be entering the facility. rev 04/23/2009 Package Page 6 AMP Summary Narrative

8 Summary Narrative (continued) Summary Narrative Page 4 FSS Cost for Palatine: The cost analysis below was obtained from URS in Grand Rapids on January 11, 2010 for site prep for the 4 th FSS for the Palatine facility. This is an estimate and as such gives a total for the job and a break down of the individual items required though not a price by item. Remove 4 Concrete column protections Limited new compressed air pipino to FSS No HVAC work Relocate HC cabinet Add fire alarm to FSS Relocate fire alarm devices on columns Remove panels in FSS footprint Add power to FSS and SAMP Power for two OCR cabinets in Computer Room Data cable for FSS and SAMP TOTAL $350,000 Space Impacts: The total interior square footage of the Palatine P&DC is 430,000 sq. ft. With the approved AMP, a gain of 43,000 sq. ft. is expected. This additional work floor space will be used for consolidated PARS processing and space for the Carol Stream FSS#2 redirection. Other Concurrent Initiative: Other operation cost savings initiatives such as Tour Compression, and PARS Centralization are in progress at both Palatine and Carol Stream P&DC's. There was no attempt to delineate them individually from the AMP proposed savings. rev 04/23/2009 Package Page 7 AMP Summary Narrative

9 24 Hour Clock Last Saved: January 25,2010 Losing Facility Name and Type: Palatine P&DC Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 600,602 Type of Distribution to Consolidate: Originating Gaining Facility Name and Type: Carol Stream P&DC Current 3D ZIP Code s : 601,603 our Indicator I' 100"/& Millions 100 /., 100% se.gaa> II II I II II rev 04/2/2008 Package Page 8 AMP 24 Hour Clock

10 Losing Facility Name and Type: Palatine P&DC Currenl3D ZIP Code(l}: 600, 602 Mil..to Gaining Flclilty: 16 miles MAP last Saved: January 25, 2010 Gaining Facility Name and Type: Carol Stream P&DC Currenl3D ZIP Code(I): 601, 603 Package Page 9 AMP MAP

11 Service Standard Impacts Last Saved: January 25, 2010 Losing Facility: _P..;.a_la..;.t... 'n..:..e_p...&_d_c"-- _ Losing Facility 3D ZIP Code(s): 600, 602 Gaining Facility 3D ZIP COde(S):" ,-=6:-= Based on report prepared by Network Integration Support dated: 10/21/2009 Service Standard Changes Average Daily Volume (data obtamed from ODIS is denved from samplmg and may vary from actual volume) FCM PRI PER' STD' PSVC ALL CLASSES Overnight % Change All Others % Change Total % Change All % Change All % Change All % Change All % Change All % Change UPGRADE 0 0.0% 0 00% 0 0,0% 0 00% 0 00% 0 00% % % DOWNGRADE 0 00% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 00% 0 00% 0 0.0% 1, % 1, % TOTAL 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 00% 0 00% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2,051 79% 2, % NET UP+NO CHNG 985, % 3,215,196 00% 4,200, % 42, % 0 0.0% a 00% 24,876 14% 4,267,592 00% VOLUME TOTAL 985,223 3,215,196 4,200,419 42,297 26,077 4,288,793 : 'eri2cli~la~d.~ta.ncl.a.rdrn.ail()ri9.in3.:di9it.~f'~~e.t() cl.e~tina.ti()n3.:di9.ill;1 ' ~ode!.v'()lu~e!js.r.lol.av..aililtj'e. _...,Selectedsummaryfields are transferred to the Executive Summary Service Standard Changes Pairs FCM PRI PER STD PSVC AU CLASSES OvemiQht % Change All Others % Change Total % ChanQe All % Change All % Chanoe All % Chanae All % Chanae All % Change UPGRADE 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% % 14 04% 4 0,1% % DOWNGRADE 0 0,0% 0 00% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 01% 4 0,1% 4 0.1% 12 01% TOTAL 0 00% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0,0% 26 07% 18 0,5% 8 02% 52 03% NET 0 0.0% 0 00% 0 0.0% a 00% % % 0 0.0% % Notes: _ rev 10/16/2009 Package Page 10 AMP Service Standard Impacts

12 ~-'- -_._~ (WorkBook Tab Notification - 1) Losing Facility: Palatine P&DC Stakeholders Notification Last Saved January 25, 2010 Stakeholder Notification Page 1 AMP Event: Start of Study NewsBreak 06/10/ /10/ /10/2009 Neal Tisdale National Assoc of Letter Carriers "~_~."'~... _'.'... _~ _u_~...".._. _._. _.. _.. _ r... _._~ Stev~ Taylor Natl Rural Letter Carrier Assoc 06/10/2009 Natl League of f>ostmasters_ 06/10/2009 Ruth Cauble NAPUS National Executive Board 06/10/2009 Bria~, Wagner NAPS Central Region VP 06/10/2009 Jackie E.nglehart. President, APWU 06/10/2009 Yulanda Robinson ~....'.0. _._. ','_", ",',. Plesident,. NPMHU _ 06/10/ /10/2009 ~ ~.._._,'--- T Richard _ Durbin _ ~ _ _ ~.~._"'.. ~_..~,. _ 06/10/ /2009 Melissa Bean 06/10/2009 Suzanne Bassi House of Representatives 06/10/2009 Jim Schwantz Mayor of Palatine 06/10/2009 Malt Murphy State Senate 06/10/2009 Carol Fowler WBBM TV CBS Channel 2 06/10/2009 Angela Rosemond WMAQ TV NBC Channel 5 06/10/2009 Carne Walker WLS TV ABC Channel 7 ~. -"-,--." _... _.- _.- -,',- 06/10/2009 Package Page 11 rev 07/16/2008 AMP Stakeholders Notification

13 Stakeholders Notification (continued) (WorkBook Tab Notification - 1) Losing Facility: Palatine P&DC Stakeholder Notification Page 2 AMP Event: Start of Study GregCaputo WGN TV Channel 9 06/10/2009 Andre"" FiniaysOfl WHO TV Fox ,-.,-._._.._._.- -~-'---'--"'-'.--'--~ /10/2009 _... - ""- 06/10/ /10/ /10/2009 WBBM-AM Radio WBEZ-FM Chicago Public Ra.dio. WGN-AM Radio 06/10/ Package Page 12 rev 07/16/2008 AMP Stakeholders Notification

14 ----~"....-_...- Stakeholders Notification (WorkBook Tab Notification - 2) Last Saved January 25,2010 Losing Facility: L:::~:~nn~ Palatine P&DC Harper College; 1200 W Algonquin Rd; Palatine I L Stakeholder Notification Page 1 AMP Event: Public Meeting Meeting Date: _9_/2_21_200_9 Meeting Time: 7:00-9:00 PM _ NewsBreak 09/08/ /08/ / /08/2009.~.><_.."-_...,,~-~ "..~---...~...._ _. _,,--._~ / ,_..._-.~---~-._.- _._.._..._.----_..,--- Mark Kluge. Na.t1 League of Postmasters. 09/08/2009 Ruth Cauble NAPUS National Executive Board r ,_ _ 09/08/2009 N,'\PS Central Region VP 09108/2009 Ja<:kie.Englehart Preslden~ A~WU /2009 Yulanda Robinson PresidentNPMHU 09/08/2009 Roland Burris 09/ Richard Durbin -._~._, _ / / _._-_.._--~-~----~---,,_._.._ Suzanne Bassi House of Representatives 09/08/2009 Jim SChwantz Ma)'or,9fPalatine _ 09/08/2009 MattMurphy State Senate 09/08/2009 Carol Fowler WBBM TV CBS Channel 2 09/08/2009 Angela Rosemond WMAQ-TV NBC Channel 5 09/08/2009 Carrie Walker WLS TV ABC Channel 7 09/08/2009 Package Page 13 AMP Stakeholders Notification

15 (WorkBook Tab Notification - 2) Losing Facility: Palatine P&DC Stakeholders Notification (continued) rev 07/16/2008 Stakeholder Notification Page 2 AMP Event: Public Meeting WGN TV Channel 9 09/08/2009 WFLD TV Fox 32 09/08/ /08/2009 :... ; " ~':, 09/08/ /08/ /08/2009 WBBM-AM Radio WGN-AM '_ " Radio ~." _H_'U_.'_'_""'_'_._~..""_,._..._u_...~.~.. _. _.._._. ~..,_._..._._ 09/08/ /08/2009~,_o_. ~.._.,,, ~ u,,_ Package Page 14 AMP Stakeholders Notification

16 Workhour Costs Current Losing Facility: Palatine P&OC Lasl Saved: January 25, 2010 Gaining Facility: Carol Stream P&OC Date Range of Data: /09 Function 1 $37.10 $43.10 "1----'.,,::-:::::1 "1- -:;.,,":-;.90-:1 "L... -,':;;.":;;..04.:.J (') (2) (3) cu;%", I~;'~: 1%001"''';''' ",,"- Volu~ i " Function 4 SO.OO 42 $0,00 42 $3.17 " " $0.00 $0.00 $ SO.OO $39.75 (5) (0) (7( Workhou" _~rodu<fi'~ty , j! !......!... Y $9 ---' t-== Annual S! 55 $j', $: ';5 5'...! S... ii, r...! ~ii;;;ii~ Package Page 15 \': "";,Ji;,' \4 ~'" " " " Function 1 $46"50 12 $41.20 " $39.44 $41.51 $33.98 $0.00 $31.69 $36.45 ~ Function 4 " " $0.00 $3U3 $29,91 $35.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $3UO (10) (H) (12) {U) (14) Current % Moved to Current Current Current Current Current Operatlon Losing Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual PrOdUctivity Annum : Volume NATPHVolume Workhours (PH or NATPH Workhour Costs- $ $ q 011 $0 014 $ $177, $17,696 ~ 018 $0 r!j 019 $55.382,'" 020 $265, $0 022 $0 ': 028 $ $1,148, E~ 047 $0 060 $443, $8,869 : 067 $1.990 "'" $36,982 $315,476 ~ 127 $4,271,506 = 120 $ $1.061, $0 461 $ $ $0 : 209 $0 ry 225 $55, $ : 230 I $66, I $2,210, $486,1 254 ~ $489 : 281 $539, AMP Workhour Costs ~ Current

17 '" (2l '3' cu~~~t '5' '6' (7l l :.,era~~ 1%"a".n~'O _~rodu<~'~,, Annual Volu"", Workh;"',., I 043 $ $ $ $ $ $71, $41, $50, I $54, I 54, $1, I $1,300., 097 $52,954., 098 $59, '" =!I '" $ I $510, $159 12S $7,083 j $1526. $ $1, 13S S85 Package Page 16,GgC, ~i(24 's' Hi( St. ',2: 1,j S',,., (10) (ii) (12) (13) (14) Current '" Current Current Current Current Current % Moved to Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH or losing Annual Productivity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhouf!l TPH or NATPH Workhour Costs 282 ~ 461dup $0 '0 461duo $0 $342,112 : ~ '" $ '* ':;' 561 $; ;; 562 $: 563, 554 '0 565 $0 585 $ $:;:)6, $225,787 : 618dup 620 $0 '" Q 618dup r? 630 $130,891 Q 776 $7, $8()4,675 "" Q 892 $242,676 " 281duo i~ -, '" S80,576 $9, $ $2,041, $ $ $ $333, S $ $ $0 089 $0 090 $ $32, $1,641 FI $46,714 $30,468 $34,4:)6 S721 $10, $2231, $0 118 $4 117 $0 122 $0 126 $2, duo 128 $45, I S1,178, SO AMP Workhour Costs - Current

18 (1) (2) (3) (') (5) (6) (1) Current Current Current Current current Current % Moved to Operation Annual FHP Annum TPH or Annual Productivity Annual Gaining Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours jtph Of NATPH Workhour Costs 131 $ $ i $ 146 $ & $ 159 $ $ $1, $1, I $616 25& $ $ $1,441, ,'63, $ $ $5,8'7 340 $129, $7, $ $ $1, $5 448 $ $2, $ ,123, $7 629 $520, $ $ $0 856 $0 867 $ $ $ 'II 876 $ $2,1 896 $1 I 897 $1 I 918, $7, 919 I $1,691, $1,350,570 Package Page 17 (') (9) (10) (11) (12) (131 (14) Current Current Current Current Current Current % Moved to Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH Of Annual producl1vlty Annual Losing Numbers VollJfne NATPHVolume Workhours itph Of NATPH Workhour CO$t5 131 $ $0 147 $0 155 $0 151 II $0 200 $0 t=i ~5'51"12 $0 213 $0 233 $0 234 $ z.o $ , $0 283 $117, $ $ $0 325 $0 340 $8, $0 443 $0.44 $0 445 $0 445 $0 44JJ $0 484 $0.96 $0 519 $1, $0 629 $ Il46 $ $0 655 $0 857 $0 673 I I $ {) I 51,611,521 AMP Workhour Costs ~ Current

19 ~ Il} 121 1'1 14} IS} IS} 17} Current Current Current Current Current Cuttent % Moved to Operation Annua! FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity Annual GaIning Number. V()jume NATPH Volume Workhours itph or NATPH Workhouf Costs 964 SO 966 S S $113 I I" 1101 (11) {12j 11J},I Current Current Current Current Current IU} Moved to Annuat FHP Annual TPH or Annual Pro-ductivlty Annual Losing Volume NATPHVatume WorkhoUfs TPH or NATPH Wor!d'lout Cost!- ~$ $311,815 05<} $ $ $ S S $668.28<l 110 $ $112 $64,722 Pia S S Sl $88 sao S292 $42,656 Sl S $ $ $ $ $2114 a $ $ $ $14 ~, I, I I Package Page 18 AMP Workhour Costs - Current

20 (1) 12) O~:~::, NUmbers % Moved to Gaining (3) Current Annuat FHP Votume (4) Curtent Annual TPH or NATPH Volume! (') Current Annual Workhour. 16) Current Productivity! (TPH or NATPH) 111 Current Annual WorkJ'louf Costs 16) 19) (10) 111) (12) (H) {14} Current Current Current Current Current Current Operation "" Moved to Annual fhp Annuaf TPH or Annual Productivity Annual Losing Numbers Voiume NATPH Volume Workhouf. I ttph or NATPH} Workhour Costs [ Package Page 19 AMP Workhour Costs - Current

21 ~.t:i_ - 1'1 12) 1'1 14) I') (0) (1) CurT*'lt Curt-.nt CurrlM'lt Current Current Current o_on "Moved'o Annu*FHP Annual TPH Of Annual Productivity Annual Numbtt. Volume NA,TPHVolWM Wo,,",oun ITPH Of NATPH Workhout Cosb (0) It) (10) ) IU) (14) Current % Mondlo C"nent Current Current Current Current Operation AfV'1UAlI FHP Annual TPH Of Annual Annual Nu_. lo_ --<tty Vofume NATPH Voh,l1M Woril.hourt I [TPH '" NATPHI World'1our COM:t -- Totals 3752« $ ~ Uilit , «55794 ~ 399 otu3e $ ~ , ,345 $33, All no $ Totals -~.~~{ n $ t Mo';MIdIG\JlIt ,504 3,351 5,532 $ ~ $ , , , $ ailhqnfj , , $4, All $ Total FHP to be Transfamtd (Averaoe Oalfy Volume): 1,210,621 (Thl. nul't'lbef it. clloied fofwwd to AMP Work'lll'1ffi Ex~ SummMy l C~nt FHP at Gaining Factttty' (Averao- Oaify Volume! : 5,494,91 S (Thi& nuf1'1bej is canied forward to AMP WorUheet ExtICUttve SLHJYYIaI)') Combined Current Workhour Annual Wor1thour COtts : $132,147,060 (Th~ I'\l.Jrriler is C.-rTilld forw.d tt1lt'1e bottom ot AMP Worksh«t Worlthour COMS-PropoMd) 172,03t,576 37,509, , ,972,323 3,332,373,366 2,131,3", ,284111,211 7,326,045,339 9,300,340,716 1,415,129 1,503,784 1,636,141 99,316 3,239,241 1,4-40 6,176 1,499 4, ,026 $56, $ $56, $66, $4, $132,147,050 PBcf(age Page 20 AMP Workho-ur CO!ts ~ Current

22 Workhour CostS Proposed Last Saved January 25, 2010 Losing Facility: Palatine P&DC Gaining Facility: Carol Stream P&OC 11) 12) (3) 14) (5) (6) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours I {TPH 0' NATPHI Workhour Costs no:.;su. 010 $0 011 $ $0 016 $0 \'672,g;, $; 030 $0 :)35 S',(\79! 040 $0 047 $0 060 $0 066 $0 067 $0 070 $ i I $16; ;!!.G''l ;no OJ(..,... 'ri;;si; 232 $0 254 $0 261 $0 271 $0 281 $ $0 441 $0 468 $0 cg' ;u,,, ji!ls.f 'i;o iji) ;e) U ~i;2.$26.16 In 17) 16) 19) (10) 111) 1(2) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP Annuaf TPH Of Annual Productivity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours {TPH 0' NATPHI Workhour Costs 002 $314, $99, $ $27, $441, $19, , , $265, $0 022 SO 028 SO 030 $2338, S3,509, $94, S541, Sll, $2, $53, $330, $4,271, $1, $1.635, dun $ du $0 461 ; 1502, , $ $33, $72, ,008, $ $2,329, $487, $ , , $0 461dup dup $ , i $419, ,8 562 $7.036 Package Page 21 AMP Workhour Costs, Proposed

23 P} 12} PI 14} IS} 161 Propoud Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed I Proposed Operation Annuat FHP Annual TPH Of Annual Productivity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume WorkhoUfS ITPH 0' NATPH} Workhoor C... ;'ib' \\i! $4,.,!((! 618 $ Sf! 628 $0,j}0 :24 If; 'S.Sf; 871 $0 872 $0 881 $0 891 $0 892 $0 9 1 $0 9 2 $0 971 $0 043 $28, ,442, , $ $78, $2,197,849 os: $ {jo $0 089 $114, : BO 09: 094 os, ${) osg I SO CDB 182,58& OS9 $ $480, $7, $541, $ $ $510, $ $7, $1, $1, $ $0 137 $0 143 $42, $117, $66,020 IT} 18} 19} I'O}! Ill} 1'2} PropOSed Proposed Proposed Proposed I Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH Of Annual! Productivity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours ITPH 0' NATPHI WorkhOUt Costs 563 I $1,681, I $ $25, $536, $551, $248, dup $0 620 $15 618dup $0 630 $131, $10, $ $357, duo $0 891duo $0 892duo $0 961 $126, $39, $0 043 $2,041, $ $40, $128, $333, $2,093,,... n y 110 $ $ $2,231, so 118 $4 117, $ duo ~ 136 $0 137 I SO 143 I $0 144 I $0 145 $0 Package Page 22 AMP WOrkhour Costs Proposed

24 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annuai FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours TPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs 146 $ S SO 151 SO 160 Sl, S183,54O 169 $359, , $1,054, $1, S6, $835, S2, S $1,619, $ $5, S5, Sl,509, SO 239 SO 256 SO 263 $ $ $1,463, $ S S5, S $0 443 SO 444 SO 445 $0 448 SO 448 $0 494 S2, $0 619 $2,123, Sl 629 $520, SO 848 SO 854 SO 858 SO 887 I SO 813 SO 814 SO 818 SO 817 $0 893 Sl135, S2,189, S114, S135, $1,586, $1, i7i (61 (91 (101 (111 (121 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH Of Annual ProductiVity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours I (TPH or NATPHI Workhour Costf, 146 SO 141 $0 156 $0 151 SO 160 $ $1, $30, $794, S $135, SO 200 SO 210 Sl,614,l SO 212 $2,503, SO 233 SO 234 S $122, SO 239 SO 258 SO 283 so 283 Sl $ S SO 325 SO 340 S8, so 443 SO 444 SO 445 SO 448 SO 448 SO 494 SO 498 $0 819 $1,882, $0 629 $0 814 $0 846 $0 654 $0 856 SO 667 SO 613 SO 874 SO 876 SO 877 SO 893 $ $2,407, $2, $ $7,892, $184,367 Package Page 23 AMP Workhour Costs Proposed

25 (1) i (2) 131 (4) (5) (61 Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volul'M Workhours IITPH o. NATPHI WorkhOUf Costs 930 $1 350, $0 966 $8, $0 914 $0, I (7) (8) (91 (10) (11) (12) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP I Annual TPH Of Annual Productivity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhouf. TPH Of NATPH\ Workhour Costs 930 $1611, $0 988 $24, SO 914 $0 012 $ $311, $ $0 064 $119, $6,049 I 114 $194, $868, $0 214 $ I $112 I 321 $64, duD $0 482duD so 463 $137, $663, $1,111, $ $ $ SO 831 $0 863 $0 811 $0 812 SO 875 $0 895 S $ S $0 963 $8, $0, I, I Package Page 24 AMP 'fjornhour Costs Proposed

26 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 16) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual ProductiVity Annual Numbers Volume NA TPH Volume Workhour$ I ftph or NATPH Workhour Costs "-- (7) (8) 19) 1'0) (11) (12) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP I Annual TPH or Annual Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhour. Workhour Costs IlT:~~~~~~HI,, -,, Package Page 25 AMP Workhour Costs ~ Proposed

27 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (5) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH Of Annual Productivity Annual Numbers Volume NATPH Volume Workhours I (TPH or NATPHI Workhour Costs I (7) (81 (9) (10) (111 (12) Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Operation Annual FHP Annual TPH or Annual Productivity Annual Numtu!rs Volume NATPH Volume Workhours. itph or NATPH Wotkhour Costs I I I , $22,014,113 ~ 8,872 12,986 $388, ,289,66 580, $22,402,984 1,229, ,922,982, ,493 4,486 $37260,512 AD $ ,848,821, ,889 2,453 $29,289, No Calc $0 1,846,821, ,889 2,453 $29,289, ,588 3,403,063, , $29,820,129 II872,039,578 GillOOiItt 138,972, ,184,116 98,216 2,242 $4,271,751 AD $ Package Page 26 AMP Viorkhour Costs - Proposed

28 Total' No Calc $0 Tota' No Cllc $0 Combirnrd Current Annual Workhour COlt : $132,147,060 (ThIS number txought forward from Workhour Cosls - Current) Propoud Annual Workhour Co.,: $123,0«,770 (Total ot Columns 6 and 12 on thi' page) Minimum Function 1 Workhour Savings : ';290,SO~ ihlii. number represents plopo$ed 'W'Ofkhour sailings W'I1tl no prodvetivity improvemenu applied to operations at the gatlilng tacmyl Function 1 Workhour SavIng. : J<'L 1O;(2'}O (This number equals the difference in the current and proposed workhour cosu above and :6 carried tol'\l\l<lrd to the Executive Summary) 872,039,578 2,138,891,089 1,324,059 1,615 $51,303,507 37,509, ,220,142 8,872 12,988 $381, ,549,138 2, ,211 1,332,931 1,691 $51,892,378 2,283,851,900 7,328,045,38 1,594,«4 4,595 $87,080,6<12 138,972, ,184,116 96,216 2,242 $4,271,751 m,$40 1 m." 3 iu 0 No calc No calc $ J $ ,332,37J 886 9,800, , ,028 $132,147, $ $9,102,290 0,0' e,6~t.;, -tu''"i. r",,04/f12iz()()q Package Page 27 AMP Workhour Costs - Proposed

29 Other Workhour Move Analysis Gaining Facitity Carol Stream P&OC 04"J'''''' 750 7~G?5O " ,..,.., '2, 010 0'0 6' 017 6" 617 ""." "". "' "' T !i3 7!i "" "'" "" / < m J3 9J $115,.. " '" '"." M... "" m t7.,. '1.. $to '" '" Packttge Page 28 AMP Othef CUfT ;1$ Prop

30 ,. ' Package Page 29 AMP Oiher CUrt 'IS: Prop

31 Totals o "'0 1251S. $0 $11 8Z Totals o '''66S $0 $6786, '9002 $21055<463 o Rod -I~ a Sla "'OJ>< L 14!453 o "'9,505 6"" 662 $0 $ Sla a ),(5191 SQ.( 710 $72$1728 $14269,001 $ Proposed All supervisory. WO~~.. urs. _SillU ld@... ~ ~ fl "'~ F'fM~ Pr~,Iwv-...l ~MtIual =...~ ~~($) =" ~ ~Co"(l) ' $1 roo JO 95' , '" m ṃ.. 1 '" t.22':l -tilu09 '" <;:5~0r\l11 so PaCkage Page 30 At-AP Other Curr vs Prop

32 Package Page 31 AMP Other Cun vs Prop

33 _~U,OS J60 o o a Rod, toe o o.-red,.me o «3650 Total8 ' , <687.. m, 7eo.$370 41G A-l S / " Totals < $ o~sla '.7 $59«687 "" <09, !O "".. 0!O o -.Jl'" 0!O,~ 0 0!O "no 0!O - '. ~t-lreo.t{si 70J 78< , '89 ", a... '" "'- PtopoMd~ """. """'- --" o...riiid 0!O &-lnc 0 O~SIa $ N!O 60, $ Grouped Subtotals for Transportation, Maintenance, Supervision & Flow Adjustments, along with Facility and Combined Summaries LOSIng factfify Z LOSIng Facility T P\IS Transportation PV$ Transportation PVS Transportation PVS LDC LOC 31 ' !O J2!O J2 33 J3!O JJ 719 SS 6-40 J18 OJ '" 93 '" >3' " OJ T~ S2JoTl Totals 152((IQ J82 J05 T",...,.. rr..,.py8 ~ "" 0J0a:~:;::~;1 $2$;~~;1 fr..-..p\l, ~ ~:~:;::l $:~~~I ~:~:;::~l $155707!O!O $ n 1$1 S2s~~;~;1 31 J2 J3 '" J Si219'57 J82 J05 S5s~~;1 Padage Page 32 AMP Other CUff lis Prop

34 Maintenance Maintenance Malntenance '. LaC LDC CDC wc ,039,~ J ''''''' , 1 ToI&l. SupeNisor Summary Supervisor Summary SupeMSOfY ~H~~~~ 39 $1~ 93 SJ:52 Totm $13991, $7,281,72$ $155C.lOl $4,208,6-4 SH ,~ eo ".. Teiall $ '.(,835,482 '0 $225,692 SP79,118 $17,19(1 '0 '0 '0 ' '0 $ LDC ' ".. r"",. Cl#Tm~ ClXf"~ Wi:lrkhow' ~ Co" {$ $ ,.(,«3, $ $1.637,0' ldc eo ".. leiall 140.SCM..", $1,779, $17, $ ldc eo ".. Toia'- $ut,ns ~,443,650 $ ' Current - Combined _..._- <""",,,,,,,,,,(_:_"'-"";7;" "'-"'"- T'lN\~o,..(NM1! "'liik_.o,.",,*,}j --.,""...fcntt:jmoto"'i""'. ~I r_ 1 Summary by SUb-Group o "«o o 2, $ $ ",cpo'" Mooe PrQPOM'd AnnuarI P'ropoMcl Aln;;aiI OPftatkm ~ ~Co.t($ $11 0J B2 $6J «2 A A PIOj)OHd + Special Adjustm.nta. Combineod- ~ ~Oott{' o Aft A Change «7 05< 825,9< <4 Not Tolal 9<.'" 'i_'~jc""ola'i'_-pvs'i",~ Iftbol. l'\loj'<"vl"r,,.,..pvst.e ;i~[""'_~11b ~,_I~""",,>o;II() ,.,.'f_ Package Page 33 AMP Other Curr... Prop

35 Staffing - Management Last Saved: January 25,2010 Losing Facility: _P_a_la_tl_ n_e_p_&_d_c ~ Data Extraction Date: 06/05/09 Finance Number: Management Positions (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Position Title Level Current Auth Current Proposed Line Staffing On-Rolls Staffing 1 SR PLANT MANAGER (1) PCES SR MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE EAS MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT EAS OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FIE EAS MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-20 4 : OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FLO) EAS MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIALIST EAS MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT EAS MGR CPTR MAIL FORWARDING OPERATIONS EAS MGR FIELD MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS MGR TRANSPORTATION/NETWORKS EAS NETWORKS SPECIALIST EAS-18~ OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-17 10!l SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPORT EAS SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS EAS ASSOCIATE SUPERVISOR-DIST OPS EAS SECRETARY (FLO) EAS Difference Package Page 34 AMP Staffing - PCEStEAS

36 Retirement Eligibles: Totals Position Loss: 1 0_... Package Page 35 AMP Staffing - PCES/EAS

37 Gaining Facility: Carol Stream P&DC Data Extraction Date: 06/05/09 Finance Number: Management Positions (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) Line Current Auth Current Proposed Position Title Level Staffing On-Rolls Staffing Difference 1 PLANT MANAGER (2) PCES MGR IN-PLANT SUPPORT EAS MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE EAS MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FIE EAS MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR TRANSPORTATIONINETWORKS EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING SPECIALIST EAS MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT EAS MGR FIELD MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS SUPV DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPORT EAS SUPV TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS EAS NETWORKS SPECIALIST EAS OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-15 0 i MAIL FLOW CONTROLLER EAS SECRETARY (FLO) EAS Package Page 36 AMP Staffing - PCES/EAS

38 RetIrement EligIbles: Total PoSItIon Loss: 1..._-,-0 Total PCES/EAS Position loss:======0===(this number carried forward to the Executive Summary) rev 11/05/2008 Package Page 37 AMP Staffing - PCES/EAS

39 Staffing Craft Last Saved' January Losing Facility: Palatine P&DC Finance Number: Data Extraction Date: 06/05/09 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Craft Positions Casuals Part TIme Full Time Total Total On-Rolls On-Rolls On-Rolls On-Rolls Proposed Difference Function 1 - Clerk ' Function 4 - Clerk Function 1 - Mail Handler Function 4 - Mail Handler Function 1 & 4 Sub-Total (180' Function 3A - Vehicle Service Function 38 - Maintenance /14' Functions Lmtd/RehablWC Other Functions I Total ,264 1,294 1,100 (194) Retirement Eligibles: 424 Gaining Facility: Carol Stream P&DC Finance Number: Data extraction Date: 06/05/09 (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) Craft Positions Casuals Part Time Full Time Total Total On-Rolls On-Rolls On-Rolls On-Rolls Proposed Difference Function 1 - Clerk Function 1 - Mail Handler Function 1 Sub-Total Function 3A - Vehicle Service Function 38 - Maintenance Functions LmtdlRehablWC Other Functions Total ,13-4 1,157 1, Retirement Eligibles: 361 Total Craft Position Loss: 130 (ThIS number cartied forward to the Execu/IVe SummaI}') (13) Notes FTE based on Stephen Masse DAR Factors letter dated OS/27/2009 rev Package Page 38 AMP Staffing - Craft

40 Losing Facility: Palatine P&DC Date Range of Data: Apr Mar Maintenance Last Saved: January 25,2010 Gaining Facility: Carol Stream P&DC LDC 36 Workhour Activity Mall Processing $ Equipment 8,210,332 $ 7,039,840 $ (11 LDC 36 E Building Equipment $ 1,405,385 $ 1,405,385 $ ~ Building Services $ 4,053,408 $ 4,053,408 $ (Cusloditll Cle8llmg) Workhour Activity Mall Processing $ Equipment Building Equipment $ Building Services $ (custodiaj Cltlanmg) 6,786,461 7,281,728 $ 495,261 1,550,015 $ 1,550,015 $ 0 4,208,642 $ 4,208,642 $ 0 Maintenance Operatlons $ Support 1,156,955 $ 1,156,955 $ 1,093,811 $ 1,093,811 $ 0 216,942 $ 216,942 $ 0 Maintenance $ Training 352,346 $ 352,346 $ 0 15,043,023 $ 13,872,531 ( ) Difference othor llolatod Mal_...II Facility Co$t$ 13,991,274 $ 14,486,542 $ Current CostI Difference Tota' 2,934,852 $ 3,004,608 $ 69,756 Adjustments 0 Adjustments 0 Grand Total 18,045,607 $ 16,713,862 $ (1,331 ',145) Grand Total 16,926,126 $ 17,491,150 $ 565,023 Annual Maintenance Savings: S_~_I6_6_,.,7_2_2_ (Thi& number cllrriltd folwllrd to the E_eeufive Summ y) (7) Notes Includes additional PartsJMat6l;ah> needed In Carol Stream to SUPP?f110 AFCS Package Page 39 AMP Maintenance

41 Transportation PVS Last Saved January 25, 2010 Losing Facility:..;.P..;.a:,:la:,:ti",n~e=-P..;.&;.::D...:C:.- Finance Number: Date Range of Data: -~0~4:7,fO::-:1;-;:fO::-:8:------:-tO----03f31f09 _ Gaining Facility: Carol Stream P&DC Finance Number: _1;.:;6::..1:;;2:.;.7.:::.5 _ (1) (2) (3) Current ProDosed Difference PVS Owned EQuipment Seven Ton Trucks 0 Eleven Ton Trucks 0 Single Axle Tractors Tandem Axle Tractors Spotters PVS TransDortation Total Number of Schedules Talai Annual Mileage 507, ,538 0 Total Mileage Costs $553,216 $446,633 $!066:5J PVS Leases Total Vehicles Leased Total Lease Costs $0 PVS Workhour Costs LOG 31 (617,679,764) $155,707 $155,707 $0 LOG 34 (765, 766) $2,321,719 $2,321,719 $0 Adjustments." " Total Workhour Costs $2,477,426 $2,477,426 $0 $0 PVS Owned EQuipment (4) (5) (6) Current Proposed Difference Seven Ton Trucks Eleven Ton Trucks Single Axle Tractors Tandem Axle Tractors Spolters PVS Transportation Total Number of Schedules 115 (b) Total Annual Mileage 1,319,026 ',',,! ':' i67!,n Total Mileage Costs $1,437,738 '!' ::.ii' $211b':': PVS Leases Total Vehicles Leased Total Lease Costs $0 PVS Workhour Costs LOG 31 (617,679,764) $ $721,897 $0 LOG 34 (765, 766) $5,640,318 $5,640,318 $0 Adjustments ".0' "," $94,481 Total Workhour Costs $6,362,214 $6,456,695 PVS Transportation Savings (Losing Facility): I ')6,5661 PVS Transportation Savings (Gaining Facility):L.I!;...d;...23";""..;.2l_ 'J...1 ' Total PVS Transportation Savings: = ~«_=_= :(T,.~hiS number 's summed with Tolal from 'Trans-HeR' and carried forward 10 the Summary as Transporfalion Savings) 6 additional schedules are collection shuttles between CS and PaL Cost difference is due to change in mileage cost ($1.09 for current vs, $0,88 for proposed) Adjustments from Other Curr vs Prop tab amounts to +3,744 hrs = 2.1 FTE but covered by existing PVS personnel PaCkage Page 40 AMP Transportation PVS

42 Transportation - HeR Last Saved: January 25, 2010 losing Facility:_P...;a...;la...;ti...;ne.:...-P...;&...;D...;C'-- Type of Distribution to Consolidate: _O_r...;i9;...in_a_t_in...;9..:.- Gaining Facility: Carol Stream P&DC cet for cancellations: 20:30 cet for OGP: 22 :45 Data Extraction Date: 06/01/ Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost per Numbers Mil Cost Mile Milea e Cost Mile $1,124,931 $2,53 531,072 $1,312,386 $ AS 102,200 $213,442 $2,09 102,200 $213,442 $2,09 600BR 124,731 $197,048 $ ,731 $197,048 $1, ,727 $2,585,173 $3,21 1,028,183 $3,191,861 $ B 181,058 $358,343 $ ,306 $426,051 $1, ,621 $312,165 $ ,621 $312,165 $2, ,495 $36,000 $ ,495 $36,000 $ ,699 $966,662 $2,19 510,651 $1,094,928 $2,14 600Ml 360,416 $1,320,144 $ ,519 $1,603,786 $ M2 23,337 $49,366 $2,12 23,337 $49,366 $2,12 600M3 175,912 $250,893 $ ,912 $250,893 $1.43 CT for Outbound Dock: 23: I Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost per Numbers Mileaqe Cost Mile Mileaae Cost Mile ,005 $47,108 $ ,005 $47,108 $ M 23,327 $61,327 $ ,327 $61,327 $ Al 5,475 $55,133 $ ,300 $70,754 $ AQ 18,200 $151,505 $ ,200 $151,505 $ BK 523,224 $1,152,689 $ ,224 $1,152,689 $ ,239 $2,355,797 $ ,609 $2,345,126 $ ,381 $37,469 $184 20,381 $37,469 $ ,664 $54,000 $2,89 18,664 $54,000 $ ,102 $143,854 $160 90,102 $143,854 $ lr 299,284 $536,349 $ ,198 $542,311 $1, " $1,473,375 $2,17 646,575 $1,414,663 $2,19 $0,00 Package Page 41 AMP Transportation - HeR

43 I Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Current Current Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost per Route Annual Annual Cost per Annual Annual Cost per Numbers Mileaae Cost Mile Mileaae Cost Mile Numbers Mileage Cost Mile Mileaae Cost Mile I I I Package Page 42 AMP Transportation - HeR