The Business Case for Leveraging IUID for Total Life Management

Transcription

1 The Business Case for Leveraging IUID for Total Life Management Mr Robert Persely Director of Logistics Light Armored Vehicles 1

2 This presentation contains reference to United States Government military capabilities that may not be authorized for release or sale to other countries. Mention of these capabilities in no way implies that the United States Government will release or consider release of them or any associated classified or unclassified information pertaining to them. 2

3 Agenda PM LAV: Who We Are The Platform The OSD Vision Achieving Sense & Respond Logistics The PM s Vision Implementing the Vision Integrating the Elements Evaluating the Business Case 3

4 PMO LAV ASN TACOM MCSC PEO LS USMC USASAC PM LAV USMC LAV Fleet Marine Personnel Carrier FMS 96 Employees and 10 Marines 4

5 USMC Family of Light Armored Vehicles LAV-C2 LAV-25 LAV-L LAV-M LAV-R LAV-MEWSS LAV-AT 5

6 Asset Information Management Supports Focused Maintenance Operations The Challenge: Know where it is FIG who has custody who is accountable how it is maintained what it cost what is its value IUID Item Unique Identification Static AIT bar codes, 2D symbols Identity In order to improve maintenance processes reduce repair cycle time enable capability-based readiness support planning, forecasting, and budgeting identify maintenance capability gaps improve reliability and warranty management of repair parts System Status health checks, embedded diagnostics, wear sensors Sensor technologies discreet sensors, MEMS, mesh-net sensors Maintenance Visibility Configuration Management Various AIT passive RF tags, ESNs, 2D symbols, embedded technical data Condition Location Source: Pauling, CTMA, March

7 FY93 FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 Amount ($) PM LAV TLCSM Vision LOGCOM (Logistics Bases) Integrating Acquisition & Sustainment Processes to Enable Total Life Cycle Management of Legacy Assets HQMC I& L Process Owner PM LAV USMC MCCDC USMC Systems Command Acquire A Platform-Centric Approach Enabled by Technology 80,000,000 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000, Data Was Low. It has Been Removed so It Does Not Skew the Results LAV Total Maintenance Costs Increase by $2.8 M/yr X Year Driven by Legacy System Sustainment Costs LAV-25 LAV-AT LAV-L LAV-M LAV-C2 LAV-R TOTAL LAV FOV Linear (TOTAL LAV FOV) Source: LAV SLEP AoA,

8 S&RL Architecture 8

9 The Building Blocks of S&RL 9

10 It s Really All About Improving Decision Making for All Stakeholders Enterprise TLCSM of MC Ground Equipment SENSE DECIDE RESPOND Fleet Data MERIT Data Data Decision info LCM info Support Decisions Tools Depots SCM DLA Industry Data Platform PM Data Product Product PM Fielding Actions OBSERVE ORIENT-DECIDE ACT EVALUATE-SENSE INTERPRET-DECIDE RESPOND EVALUATE RESEARCH-CONCEPT-STRUCTURE-DECIDE ACT 10

11 It s All About the Data Product Data Management Knowledge Management Work smarter not harder Goals: Consistent and Accurate Analysis Consolidation and Interpretation AVOID Data Overload Data as expeditionary as the Marines Stretch information across Strategic Operational Tactical IUID Enabled SIM Process Total life-cycle system management (TLCSM) Reliability centered maintenance (RCM) Condition-based maintenance (CBM) Configuration management (CM) Maintenance and material management (MM) 11

12 JAMISS Connects the Dots Asset Cost Configuration Management Asset Tracking RCM Warranty Trending PBL Asset Identification Asset Accountability Registry SIM Performance Tracking Inventory Management IUID JAMISS 12

13 Indentify the Data for Success An IUID Program can tell us: What DoD owns Who is accountable for it What it cost SIM enabled by IUID can tell us: Where it is Who has custody of it How it has been used and maintained Its current value And we can use this information to: Enable Capability Based Readiness Identify gaps in capabilities Support planning, forecasting and budgeting Improve reliability Improve warranty management Streamline logistics processes Reduce cycle time 13

14 Total Lifecycle Management Assessment Tool TLCM-AT Models Fleet Level Probability of Failure Probability of Failure Time Predicts usage across the fleet. Enables Lifecycle Manager to predict spares requirements and predict associated costs. 14

15 Total Lifecycle Management Assessment Tool Using IUID Generated Data IUID Enables Refined Analysis of Component Level Probability of Failure. Probability of Failure Time Component level Weibull analysis, informed by IUID data, provides more granular data to the predictive model facilitating more accurate maintenance planning at the platform level, which makes it possible to PLAN maintenance rather than react as well as to position spares where they will be needed. 15

16 Building a Business Case Analysis 16

17 An Evolutionary Approach 17

18 Reactive Maintenance Three Separate Failures Total Down Time 30 Days Availability Down Time Waiting Parts 8 days Repair 2 days Waiting Parts 8 days Repair 2 days Waiting Parts 8 days Repair 2 days Each failure is treated as a separate incident when it occurs. There is no knowledge of the condition of components on the vehicle, or of the risk of impending failures. 18

19 Planned Maintenance Three Separate Failures Total Down Time < 12 Days Availability Down Time Waiting Parts 8 days Repair < 4 days Most maintenance down time is spent awaiting parts. IUID data enables accurate prediction of upcoming required maintenance action in order that several such events can be packaged to be conducted at one time. Simultaneous repairs of multiple failures will also reduce total repair time. 19

20 Predictive Maintenance Three Separate Failures Total Down Time < 4 Days Availability Down Time Repair < 4 days Needed parts can be ordered before the vehicle is brought to maintenance. When the vehicle is brought in, the parts are awaiting the vehicle eliminating Logistics Delay down time completely, increasing Availability by 26 days over the period demonstrated. 20

21 Proven Impact 21

22 Notional Scenarios 22

23 Scenario Assumptions 23

24 Notional IUID & CBM+ Benefits 24

25 How Do We Get From Here to There? Data must be captured in the field Data must be made available to Marines in the field We must put a tool in the hands of maintainers and operators in the field that will enable them to capture and use IUID data This tool cannot add to the burden of the Marine It must save time and effort rather than create extra work The tool should be an integral part of the maintenance process It should be hardware agnostic However, hardware with appropriate capabilities should be sought 25

26 Summary: Lessons Learned S&RL Is Platform Centric It s All About the Data IUID = the DNA code success Must Cross Traditional Boundaries Service - to - Service NATO members Evolutionary Approach Works Best Bridge Technologies Are a Foundation Open Systems Are Required A Web 2.0 Evolutionary Build-out 26

27 27