Critical issues on the Scandinavian Mediterranean corridor. DG Mobility and Transport, Unit: Transport

Transcription

1

2 Critical issues on the Scandinavian Mediterranean corridor Martin Zeitler DG Mobility and Transport, Unit: Transport

3 Progress of Corridor Development The Final Project List includes 666 projects with total known cost of 202.4bn. 74 projects with a total cost of 14.0bn completed Most projects completed in MoS + Maritime (34) Highest total costs for Rail and Road projects. (

4 Remaining capacity issues in 2030 Finland, for rail: Kouvola HaminaKotka, Luumäki Vainikkala, Helsinki, node, Helsinki Turku; and for road: regions of Turku and Helsinki and the section Kotka Hamina Vaalimaa; Sweden, for rail: Stockholm and Gothenburg node, Hässleholm Lund, Trelleborg Malmö Denmark, for rail: (Malmö-) Copenhagen region; Germany, for rail: nodes Hamburg, Bremen, Kassel and sections Hamburg Ahrensburg ( Lübeck), Hamburg Hannover/Bremen Hannover ; and for road: regions of Hamburg (motorway A1 and A7), Hannover/Kassel (A7), Berlin, Nuremberg (A3) and Munich (A9, A8); Italy for rail,: Verona - Ponte Gardena; Florence - Livorno/La Spezia (port traffic)

5 Category Future Challenges Critical Issues Definition Pre-identified Pre-identified section according to Reg. (EU) 1316/2013, Annex I Part 1 Capacity/ Bottleneck Network capacity issues: e.g. road congestion in urban nodes, rail capacity; Physical, technical or functional barrier that leads to a system break Missing link Physically missing links e.g. in highway system and rail high speed lines Cross-border Issues located on cross-border sections, according to TEN-T Regulation (EU) 1315 Article 3 and Annex II, part 1 Interoperability/Compliance with TEN-T standards Multimodality Last mile connection Externalities/ Sustainability/ Innovation Urban areas Regulatory, technical and operational conditions, of the infrastructure in a transport mode to allow safe and uninterrupted traffic flows for that infrastructure or mode; Technical compatibility of infrastructure/vehicles and systems e.g. missing ERTMS, ITS deployment; in concrete terms, the measures resulting from the compliance analysis Issues facilitating multimodal transport services for freight and passenger transport e.g. terminal capacity issues (expansion/upgrade/construction), Issues regarding last-mile connection: e.g. lack of rail connections to airports, ports Issues regarding negative transport externalities e.g. noise, pollution, accidents; Issues where the transport infrastructure is potentially affected by the climate change, e.g. floods, increase of sea level, sea ice as well as innovation issues/pilot projects e.g. LNG, ICT, tracking and tracing Actions implementing/facilitating TEN-T transport infrastructure located in Urban nodes of the Core Network, according to Regulation (EU) 1315, Annex II, part 1 Critical issues = physical bottlenecks, technical parameters lower than the technical standards set by TEN-T and CEF

6 Agree on a common methodology for the calculation of (corridor-wide) capacity utilisation and remaining Needs: Rail compliance 2030 Define criteria for the evaluation of the 740 m objective for rail lines and nodes, Find harmonised rules for the definition of requested line capacities

7 Kouvola Oslo Rosersberg Arsta Göteborg Hoje T. Taulov Bremen Hannover Verona Prato A. Vespucci Pomezia Nola Marcianise Hallsberg Malmö KT Lübeck HH-Billwerder Großbeeren Schkopau Leipzig Nürnberg München Bologna Marche Bari Rail/Road terminals compliance 2030 Needs: Improve implementation of ICT systems Electrification 740m train accessibility Cooperation between infrastructure and terminal managers

8 Oslo Naantali Turku Helsinki Hamina/Kotka Stockholm København Lübeck Göteborg Malmö Trelleborg Rostock Hamburg Bremen Maritime/MoS compliance 2030 Needs: Clean fuels deployment Railway access Livorno La Spezia Ancona Napoli Bari Taranto Gioia Tauro Palermo Valletta Augusta Marsaxlokk

9 M M Hamina Vaalimaa (RU border) Road compliance 2030 (incl. ITS) Fehmarn Belt Fixed Link M Needs: Clean fuels deployment M

10 OSL TKU ARN HEL GOT CPH MMX Airport compliance 2030 Needs: BRE HAJ HAM BER LEJ Implementing Single European Sky NUE MUC Airport: Compliance by 2030 Compliance by 2030 Compliant (Status 2016) Clean fuels availability BLQ FCO NAP Works on-going, compliance expected Works still to be started, compliance expected Works foreseen but delayed, compliance doubted Works not yet planned/agreed for completion Not applicable / no information Parameter PMO MLA Code Location of airport Status: May 2017

11 Persisting Administrative & Operational barriers Railway interoperability on the long haul Railway interoperability on cross-border sections Airport enlargement and connectivity (rail/road) Links with neighboring countries

12 Thank you very much for our attention! Martin Zeitler DG Mobility and Transport, Unit: Transport