Managing Social Challenges in the Nuclear Decommissioning Industry: a Responsible Approach Towards Better Performance

Transcription

1 Managing Social Challenges in the Nuclear Industry: a Responsible Approach Towards Better Performance RICOMET th-29th June IAEA, Vienna 2017 Diletta Colette Invernizzi cndci@leeds.ac.uk Dr Giorgio Locatelli - G.Locatelli@leeds.ac.uk Prof Naomi J Brookes - N.J.Brookes@leeds.ac.uk

2 Agenda Nuclear Projects as Megaprojects Social challenges and their consequences Case studies Guidelines to manage the NDPs social challenges Conclusions and Q&A Managing Social Challenges in the Nuclear Industry: A responsible approach towards better performance International Journal of Project Management, in press. 2

3 Construction-Megaprojects are not new BC BC AD AD What do all these projects have in common? Huge Budget Long-time of planning/construction Great technical, economic and social challenges Poor project performance (are we sure?) Little or no considerations regarding the end of their lifecycle: Dismantling Eventual Decontamination 3

4 -Megaprojects are new 4

5 Projects as Megaprojects Nuclear Projects: are characterized by activities that range from small projects to major national multibillion projects are at least partially commissioned by governments are uncertain, complex and politically sensitive projects usually involve large numbers of stakeholders 5

6 Projects as Megaprojects No or little cash in-flow at the end No revenue-generating-assets are created No landmark outputs Employees work themselves out of job! NDPs are morally troublesome also from an intergenerational perspective 6

7 Research questions Which are the main social challenges that arise during the development of a NDP, and how do they affect NDPs? Which are the best practices to socially and ethically manage these challenges, and successfully meet the scope of the project? 7

8 Radioactive Material Which case studies? Which NDPs? Post-Operational Activities Dealing with existing legacy: Decontamination De-energizing Dismantling Demolition of existing infrastructure Construction of new facilities for the: Management Storage Disposal of radioactive material Site radiological assessment & environmental remediation Radioactive material management: e.g. material sorting, fuel management, waste processing, conditioning & passivation; transport, storage and/or disposal; post clean-up surveys Nuclear Projects and Programmes X X Site Restoration Projects X Operations of existing and new facilities X 8

9 Selected NDPs NDP Country Scope Kozloduy Ignalina Superphénix Greifswald 8 units Vandellós-I Barsebäck 1 & 2 José Cabrera Trawsfynydd Scanzanio Ionico Onkalo, Olkiluoto Bulgaria Lithuania France Germany Spain Sweden Spain UK Italy Finland of unit of Kozloduy NPP of unit Ignalina NPP Superphénix NPP Greifswald NPP Vandellós-I NPP of unit Barsebäck NPP José Cabrera NPP Trawsfynydd NPP Construction of national waste repository Construction of the waste repository Stakeholders reactions and NDPs progress Disputed AND abandoned Key reference (WNA 2016a), (WNN 2016), (EU 2015), (EU 2013a), (Öko-Institut 2013), (IAEA 2009), (Kozloduy NPP Plc 2008), (IAEA (WNA 2016b), (EU 2013a), (EU 2013b), (Öko-Institut 2013), (Ministry of Energy 2011), (IAEA 2009) (EDF 2014), (Tompkins 2011), (IAEA (Backer 2012b), (Bäcker 2012), (Backer 2012a), (IAEA 2011a), (IAEA, (IAEA 2008a) (WNA 2016c), (NEA/RWM/WPDD 2007), (ENRESA 2007), (Bond et al. 2004) (Lorentz 2014), (Lorentz 2009), (IAEA (OECD/NEA 2016),(IAEA 2016a), (WNA 2016c), (IAEA 2011a) (Hyder Consulting Limited 2010), (NDA 2009), (Bond et al. 2004), (Jones 1993) (IAEA 2009), (Zinn 2007), (Bentivenga et al. 2004) (WNN 2015b), (WNN 2015a), (WNN 2013), (EU Committee 2006) 9

10 Selected NDPs NDP Country Scope Kozloduy Ignalina Superphénix Greifswald 8 units Vandellós-I Barsebäck 1 & 2 José Cabrera Trawsfynydd Scanzanio Ionico Onkalo, Olkiluoto Bulgaria Lithuania France Germany Spain Sweden Spain UK Italy Finland of unit of Kozloduy NPP of unit Ignalina NPP Superphénix NPP Greifswald NPP Vandellós-I NPP of unit Barsebäck NPP José Cabrera NPP Trawsfynydd NPP Construction of the waste repository Construction of the waste repository Stakeholders reactions and NDPs progress Disputed AND abandoned Key reference (WNA 2016a), (WNN 2016), (EU 2015), (EU 2013a), (Öko-Institut 2013), (IAEA 2009), (Kozloduy NPP Plc 2008), (IAEA (WNA 2016b), (EU 2013a), (EU 2013b), (Öko-Institut 2013), (Ministry of Energy 2011), (IAEA 2009) (EDF 2014), (Tompkins 2011), (IAEA (Backer 2012b), (Bäcker 2012), (Backer 2012a), (IAEA 2011a), (IAEA, (IAEA 2008a) (WNA 2016c), (NEA/RWM/WPDD 2007), (ENRESA 2007), (Bond et al. 2004) (Lorentz 2014), (Lorentz 2009), (IAEA (OECD/NEA 2016),(IAEA 2016a), (WNA 2016c), (IAEA 2011a) (Hyder Consulting Limited 2010), (NDA 2009), (Bond et al. 2004), (Jones 1993) (IAEA 2009), (Zinn 2007), (Bentivenga et al. 2004) (WNN 2015b), (WNN 2015a), (WNN 2013), (EU Committee 2006) 10

11 Selected NDPs NDP Country Scope Kozloduy Ignalina Superphénix Greifswald 8 units Vandellós-I Barsebäck 1 & 2 José Cabrera Trawsfynydd Scanzanio Ionico Onkalo, Olkiluoto Bulgaria Lithuania France Germany Spain Sweden Spain UK Italy Finland of unit of Kozloduy NPP of unit Ignalina NPP Superphénix NPP Greifswald NPP Vandellós-I NPP of unit Barsebäck NPP José Cabrera NPP Trawsfynydd NPP Construction of the waste repository Construction of the waste repository Stakeholders reactions and NDPs progress Disputed AND abandoned Key reference (WNA 2016a), (WNN 2016), (EU 2015), (EU 2013a), (Öko-Institut 2013), (IAEA 2009), (Kozloduy NPP Plc 2008), (IAEA (WNA 2016b), (EU 2013a), (EU 2013b), (Öko-Institut 2013), (Ministry of Energy 2011), (IAEA 2009) (EDF 2014), (Tompkins 2011), (IAEA (Backer 2012b), (Bäcker 2012), (Backer 2012a), (IAEA 2011a), (IAEA, (IAEA 2008a) (WNA 2016c), (NEA/RWM/WPDD 2007), (ENRESA 2007), (Bond et al. 2004) (Lorentz 2014), (Lorentz 2009), (IAEA (OECD/NEA 2016),(IAEA 2016a), (WNA 2016c), (IAEA 2011a) (Hyder Consulting Limited 2010), (NDA 2009), (Bond et al. 2004), (Jones 1993) (IAEA 2009), (Zinn 2007), (Bentivenga et al. 2004) (WNN 2015b), (WNN 2015a), (WNN 2013), (EU Committee 2006) 11

12 Selected NDPs NDP Country Scope Kozloduy Ignalina Superphénix Greifswald 8 units Vandellós-I Barsebäck 1 & 2 José Cabrera Trawsfynydd Scanzanio Ionico Onkalo, Olkiluoto Bulgaria Lithuania France Germany Spain Sweden Spain UK Italy Finland of unit of Kozloduy NPP of unit Ignalina NPP Superphénix NPP Greifswald NPP Vandellós-I NPP of unit Barsebäck NPP José Cabrera NPP Trawsfynydd NPP Construction of the waste repository Construction of the waste repository Stakeholders reactions and NDPs progress Disputed AND abandoned Key reference (WNA 2016a), (WNN 2016), (EU 2015), (EU 2013a), (Öko-Institut 2013), (IAEA 2009), (Kozloduy NPP Plc 2008), (IAEA (WNA 2016b), (EU 2013a), (EU 2013b), (Öko-Institut 2013), (Ministry of Energy 2011), (IAEA 2009) (EDF 2014), (Tompkins 2011), (IAEA (Backer 2012b), (Bäcker 2012), (Backer 2012a), (IAEA 2011a), (IAEA, (IAEA 2008a) (WNA 2016c), (NEA/RWM/WPDD 2007), (ENRESA 2007), (Bond et al. 2004) (Lorentz 2014), (Lorentz 2009), (IAEA (OECD/NEA 2016),(IAEA 2016a), (WNA 2016c), (IAEA 2011a) (Hyder Consulting Limited 2010), (NDA 2009), (Bond et al. 2004), (Jones 1993) (IAEA 2009), (Zinn 2007), (Bentivenga et al. 2004) (WNN 2015b), (WNN 2015a), (WNN 2013), (EU Committee 2006) 12

13 Selected NDPs NDP Country Scope Kozloduy Ignalina Superphénix Greifswald 8 units Vandellós-I Barsebäck 1 & 2 José Cabrera Trawsfynydd Scanzanio Ionico Onkalo, Olkiluoto Bulgaria Lithuania France Germany Spain Sweden Spain UK Italy Finland of unit of Kozloduy NPP of unit Ignalina NPP Superphénix NPP Greifswald NPP Vandellós-I NPP of unit Barsebäck NPP José Cabrera NPP Trawsfynydd NPP Construction of the waste repository Construction of the waste repository Stakeholders reactions and NDPs progress Disputed AND abandoned Key reference (WNA 2016a), (WNN 2016), (EU 2015), (EU 2013a), (Öko-Institut 2013), (IAEA 2009), (Kozloduy NPP Plc 2008), (IAEA (WNA 2016b), (EU 2013a), (EU 2013b), (Öko-Institut 2013), (Ministry of Energy 2011), (IAEA 2009) (EDF 2014), (Tompkins 2011), (IAEA (Backer 2012b), (Bäcker 2012), (Backer 2012a), (IAEA 2011a), (IAEA, (IAEA 2008a) (WNA 2016c), (NEA/RWM/WPDD 2007), (ENRESA 2007), (Bond et al. 2004) (Lorentz 2014), (Lorentz 2009), (IAEA (OECD/NEA 2016),(IAEA 2016a), (WNA 2016c), (IAEA 2011a) (Hyder Consulting Limited 2010), (NDA 2009), (Bond et al. 2004), (Jones 1993) (IAEA 2009), (Zinn 2007), (Bentivenga et al. 2004) (WNN 2015b), (WNN 2015a), (WNN 2013), (EU Committee 2006) 13

14 Scanzano Jonico (Italy) 14

15 Social challenges and their consequences Major social challenges 1) Personnel transition 2) Public unacceptance Major consequences 1) Underestimated socio-economic personnel costs 2) Abandonment of the project 15

16 Is there anything that these cases have in common? NDP Country Stakeholder reaction Early and timely engagement with the local community Start the NDP planning as soon as possible, even better, when the facility is still operating Privilege the siting of a waste storage/repository where a nuclear licence has been already provided Kozloduy Bulgaria Negative X Ignalina Lithuania Negative X Superphéni x France Negative X Greifswald Germany 8 units Negative X Vandellós-I Spain Positive X X Barsebäck José Cabrera Trawsfynyd d Scanzanio Ionico Onkalo, Olkiluoto Sweden Positive X X X Spain Positive X X X UK Positive X X X Italy Negative Finland Positive X X X 16

17 Is there anything that these cases have in common? NDP Country Stakeholder reaction Early and timely engagement with the local community Start the NDP planning as soon as possible, even better, when the facility is still operating Privilege the siting of a waste storage/repository where a nuclear licence has been already provided Kozloduy Bulgaria Negative X Ignalina Lithuania Negative X Superphéni x France Negative X Greifswald Germany 8 units Negative X Vandellós-I Spain Positive X X Barsebäck José Cabrera Trawsfynyd d Scanzanio Ionico Onkalo, Olkiluoto Sweden Positive X X X Spain Positive X X X UK Positive X X X Italy Negative Finland Positive X X X 17

18 Is there anything that these cases have in common? NDP Country Stakeholder reaction Early and timely engagement with the local community Start the NDP planning as soon as possible, even better, when the facility is still operating Privilege the siting of a waste storage/repository where a nuclear licence has been already provided Kozloduy Bulgaria Negative X Ignalina Lithuania Negative X Superphéni x France Negative X Greifswald Germany 8 units Negative X Vandellós-I Spain Positive X X Barsebäck José Cabrera Trawsfynyd d Scanzanio Ionico Onkalo, Olkiluoto Sweden Positive X X X Spain Positive X X X UK Positive X X X Italy Negative Finland Positive X X X 18

19 Is there anything that these cases have in common? NDP Country Stakeholder reaction Early and timely engagement with the local community Start the NDP planning as soon as possible, even better, when the facility is still operating Privilege the siting of a waste storage/repository where a nuclear licence has been already provided Kozloduy Bulgaria Negative X Ignalina Lithuania Negative X Superphéni x France Negative X Greifswald Germany 8 units Negative X Vandellós-I Spain Positive X X Barsebäck José Cabrera Trawsfynyd d Scanzanio Ionico Onkalo, Olkiluoto Sweden Positive X X X Spain Positive X X X UK Positive X X X Italy Negative Finland Positive X X X 19

20 Guidelines to address the social challenges of NDPs Early and timely engagement with the local community Start the NDP planning as soon as possible, even better, when the facility is still operating Privilege the siting of a waste storage/repository where a nuclear licence has been already provided 20

21 Conclusions and Q&A NDPs are troublesome also from an intergenerational perspective It is possible to manage NDPs with an ethical and moral perspective, trough: Early planning Early engagement Avoiding surprises during the siting process My question to you: how can cultural difference can be taken into account? 21

22 Managing Social Challenges in the Nuclear Industry: A responsible approach towards better performance THANK YOU! Diletta Colette Invernizzi cndci@leeds.ac.uk Dr Giorgio Locatelli - G.Locatelli@leeds.ac.uk Prof Naomi J Brookes - N.J.Brookes@leeds.ac.uk

23 Ask for this paper! Happy to share it! Managing Social Challenges in the Nuclear Industry: A responsible approach towards better performance International Journal of Project Management, in press. 23