PARTNERSHIP URBAN MOBILITY. David Koppitz

Transcription

1 PARTNERSHIP URBAN MOBILITY David Koppitz

2 PARTNERSHIPS WITH CZ PARTICIPATION (SO FAR PILOT PARTNERSHIPS AIR QUALITY AND HOUSING) Ministry of Regional Development country coordinator Other bodies (ministries, cities, research institutions) active participation through Commenting on the proposals Filling out questionnaires Collecting best practice Experience from pilot partnerships can be very useful for our work on the newly formed Partnership Urban Mobility!!!

3 PARTNERSHIP URBAN MOBILITY (PUM): WHERE WE ARE CZ and Karlsruhe as PUM co-leaders from 4 Oct 2016 on (by decision of DGs in Bratislava) based on our SCOPING PAPERS delivery After DGs meeting preselection of partners by a defined procedure (too many applicants, esp. cities the list narrowed down) First meeting with Karlsruhe 29 Nov clarifying roles / division of work Final compositon of PUM December 2016

4 COMPOSITION OF PUM Belgium Cyprus 1 Finland Italy Luxembourg Poland Romania Slovenia BE: Walloon Region BG: Burgas CZ: Rádlo - CoR DE: Bielefeld IT: Bari LT: Vilnius - CEMR NL: Nijmegen PL: Gdynia - CEMR PT: Torres Vedras SE: Malmö - EUROCITIES SE: Skane Region - CEMR UK: Urban Transport Group CEMR EIB EUROCITIES ECF POLIS Network

5 MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE Schéma rolí při koordinaci práce v partnerství (z jednání ) připraví MMR

6 CZ FOCUS (BASED ON SCOPING PAPER) Public transport Basis for meeting transport demands in cities Demand for public funds necessity to ensure resources Soft mobility (walking, cycling, public space) Accessibility (for disabled, elderly, young children, etc.) and social inclusion in mobility Efficient transport and infrastructure with good internal (local) and external (regional) connectivity Suburbanisation, dependance of the region on city services increase of traffic volume Environmentally friendly solutions in urban mobility Public space (serving not only transport infrastructure)

7 ACTION PLAN TO OFFER SOLUTIONS Explore possibilities of reduction/avoiding the need for travel; Incorporate aspects of efficiency into the mobility solutions; Enhance planning approaches; Explore policy development processes so as to reflect the fast pace in innovation; Take into account impacts on the environment, public health and social issues; Consider the economic aspect of the urban environment development.

8 PROPOSED WORKING METHOD AND COMPOSITION 1. Analyse the state of play in the above described issues 2. Evaluate the existing and available support and legislative framework on the EU level 3. Interconnect with and learn from the outputs and work of the other relevant Partnerships, esp. Air quality, Climate adaptation and Energy transition 4. Cooperate with V4 coutries

9 APPROACHES AND ISSUES Mapping (what has been done so far) Sharing experiences, show-casing best practices (anticipated actions) Exploring the possibility of targeted financial support and shared and centrally managed programme Focusing research and innovation on delivering solutions for urban mobility challenges Legislation, state aid issues, public procurement in specific urban challenges Each aproach is yet to be discussed bilaterally (Karlsruhe) as well as multilaterally (with all partners).

10 OUR STRENGTH CITY LOGISTICS Global population living in cities is increasing their demand for goods and services is also increasing. The problems of urban mobility: environmental impacts of freight transport / urban pollution (CO2, SO, NO, particulates, noise) congestion less safety for inhabitants parking difficulties City logistics can solve the problems in cities&towns by: consolidation of the goods optimalised distribution off the peak-hours using more eco-friendly vehicles (bicycles, CNG or electric cars) optimum urban planning City logistics improves the mobility in the city centre and increases safety.

11 OUR STRENGTH - SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLAN Complex solution of the issue Transport Research Centre elaborated methodology for Czech cities certified by MoT

12 QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? REMARKS? THANK YOU