STM & SMART-navigation, test bed results, standardisation and future plans. Per Setterberg, SMA & Jin Hyoung Park, SNPO/KRISO

Transcription

1 STM & SMART-navigation, test bed results, standardisation and future plans Per Setterberg, SMA & Jin Hyoung Park, SNPO/KRISO

2 Honoured to present an e-nav ship

3 m/s Pearl Seaways

4 As we speak!

5 Setting sail for new horizons STM Validation ending Q Currently installing on ships Ongoing focus months in ports Simulator campaign in April Data collection and analysis starting Common Information Model Approved projects: Real Time Ferries, EfficientFlow Applications: Baltic Tankers and SAR

6 Setting sail for new horizons STM Validation ending Q Currently installing on ships Ongoing focus months in ports Simulator campaign in April Data program! collection and analysis starting Common Information Model STM is not a project, it s a Magnus Sundström Approved projects: Real Time Head Ferries, of R&D EfficientFlow Swedish Maritime Applications: Baltic Tankers Administration and SAR

7 Setting sail for new horizons

8 navigating in foul waters

9 navigating in foul waters Proliferation of standards

10 navigating in foul waters Proliferation of standards Lack of coordination

11 Agreeing on standards! CMDS RTZ EPCIS PCM VIS MCP Governance!

12 Agreeing on standards! CMDS RTZ EPCIS PCM VIS MCP The business process of shipping Regulations Information model Data standards Interfaces in an ever changing tech environment Governance!

13 SMART-Navigation Project Completion of the SMART-Navigation Project DEC st prototype 19/ DEC = 35.19% Korean e-navigation strategic implementation plan confirmation Korea e-navigation forum foundation JUL FEB 2017 JUL MAR Start of the SMART-Navigation Project Selection of SMART-Navigation Project Office NOV Preliminary feasibility study (ended) Planning research for Korean e-navigation strategy 2014 AUG 2013

14 More focus on Non-SOLAS ships

15 WIDER CONNECTION SAFER NAVIGATION M.C.P. SOLAS, Merchant GMDSS VDE(S) AIS Satellite SMART-Nav. Center LTE-M (3G/4G) Tiny/Small Vessels

16 Harmonization with International Standards

17 Systems Engineering Process

18 Service Name Navigation Monitoring & Assistance Service (NAMAS) Dedicated user/ship High risk ships Physical Link LTE-M / VDES

19 Service Name Ship-borne System Monitoring Service (SBSMS) Dedicated user/ship Passenger ships Korean Flag(Int l, Domestic) Ships requiring service Physical Link LTE-M, VDES, etc

20 Service Name Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service(SORPS) Dedicated user/ship Passenger ships Korean Flag(Int l, Domestic) Ships requiring service Physical Link LTE-M, VDES, etc

21 Service Name Real-time Electronic Navigational Chart Distribution & Streaming Service(REDSS) Dedicated user/ship Non-SOLAS ships Physical Link LTE-M

22 Service Name Pilots/Tugs Assistance Service(PITAS) Dedicated user/ship Pilot / Tug boat Physical Link LTE-M

23 Service Name Maritime Environment and Safety Information Service(MESIS) Dedicated user/ship Ships requiring the service Physical Link LTE-M, VDES, etc

24 Overall Architecture

25 Inspection on the 1 st Prototype

26

27 LTE-M Testbed

28 Drafting S-10x PS for SMART-Nav Svcs. <data identification> <data speciifcation> <Feature Catalogue & Portrayal Catalogue> <Data modeling> <SV10 DCEG >

29 Maritime Messaging Service in MCP

30 Specialty Engineering Specialty Engineering Performance modeling & analysis Reliability, Availability and Maintainability (RAM) Safety and health hazards Quality assurance Electromagnetic compatibility and Radio frequency management Human factors Sustainability and environment Constructability Whole life cost Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) System security Operability

31 A lot of times, people don't know what they want until you show it to them.

32

33 Integrated Test Center

34 Maritime Connectivity Platform

35 MCP v0.7 Release

36 The Last Season 1 MCDF Meeting

37 MCP Consortium : MCPC Advisory board Int. associations IALA, CIRM Meets around 4 Times a year Host organisations Board Secretariat General assembly Regular members Meet 1-2 times a year for big decisions Daily operation Does not meet as a separate group

38 MCPC D&R Model Decision & Responsibility Model Host org responsibility All members Support Busines Strategy Criteria for MCP operator PKI root Cert. Knowledge management MCPC Aquisition Membership application Host Membership agreement Security Quality & Performance strategy Management Org. / roles Budget (resources) Development/ standards Endorsing MCP operat. Establish WG

39 Waiting for MCDF Season2

40 Converging initiatives! Letter of Collaboration Signed 11 Oct 2017 Agree to facilitate interoperability SESAME 2 receives funding

41 Converging initiatives! Interoperable ETA from STM ships PTA to ships Static port data to ships Shell, Maersk, MSC, CMA-CGM and the ports of Rotterdam, Algeciras, Busan, Gothenburg, Houston, Singapore and Ningbo Zhoushan Coordinating efforts Planning for projects

42 Converging initiatives! Overlapping partnership Developing MCP Foundation for STM STM Populating MCP Same MSR and MIR

43 Converging initiatives! RTZ and VIS interface in 2018 work programme SMART services in STM test-beds Regular coordination meetings Cooperation on port call optimization

44 Converging initiatives! RTZ and VIS interface in 2018 work programme SMART services in STM test-beds Regular coordination meetings Cooperation on port call optimization

45 Lasting results, collaboration!

46 Study visit on the bridge Want to see a route exchange between different systems live from the bridge. Meeting point: Conference lobby, by elevators. Time: Two visits: 1730 or 1800 Sign up by the door at Coffee break

47 고맙습니다!