Shipping KPI. Bulkforum, Bergen. May 12 th 2009

Transcription

1 Shipping KPI Bulkforum, Bergen May 12 th 2009

2 Content 1. The Shipping KPI Standard 2. Application of the Standard 3. Benchmarking (application demo)

3 Industry contributors A.P. Møller-Maersk Anglo-Eastern Shipmanagement (Ltd.) Barber Ship Management Bernhard Schulte Shipmanagement BW Gas ASA Chemikalien Seetransport GmbH Columbia Shipmanagement Ltd Dobson Fleet Management EMS Ship Management Epic Eurasia International Limited Høegh Fleet Services AS Jebsen Management AS/Aboitiz Jebsen Bulk Transport Corp. Navigo Management Co NYK Shipmanagement Singapore Seaspan Ship Management Ltd Stolt-Nielsen Transportation Group TESMA holding Thome Ship Management Pte Ltd Tsakos Shipping & Trading V.Ships Wilh. Wilhelmsen ASA Main Partners: Wilh. Wilhelmsen Intermanager

4 Why the Shipping KPI Standard Increased transparency Focus on quality matters, safety issues and environmental performance Develop frameworks for reporting of operational performance meaningful for stakeholders without technical/ maritime background

5 Current industry situation Too many different indicators (KPIs) Potential for confusion and mistakes Comparison of performance between companies is difficult Additional manpower required to present the same information in many different ways (onboard, in office and to externals) Difficult to mobilize organizational focus on quality improvement due to lack of aggregated measurements New reporting requirements are emerging, especially regarding environmental issues and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

6 The KPI Project objectives Develop an an international standard for for ship ship operation and and corresponding tools to to measure company and and vessel performance In order to: boost performance improvements internally in companies engaged in ship operation activities provide an efficient communication platform of ship operation performance information to internal and external stakeholders

7 The Shipping KPI Standard - Concept SPI Aggregated indexes for external communication Financial Processes KPI Customer Learning PI HSE Others Extended Balanced Score Card for internal improvement Corporate measurements

8 The Shipping KPI Standard - SPIs Environmental performance HR HR performance Safety performance Security performance Technical Performance Navigation Performance Operational Performance

9 The Shipping KPI Standard - KPIs Accidental Accidental releases releases of of substanses substanses as as def def by by MARPOL MARPOL Ballast Ballast Water Water Discharge Discharge Violations Violations Budget Budget control control per per vessel vessel Cargo Cargo incidents incidents during during cargo cargo operations operations Cargo Cargo incidents incidents during during voyage voyage CO2 CO2 emission emission performance performance Condition Condition of of Class Class Contained Contained Spills Spills Crew Crew behaviour behaviour Crew Crew management management Crew Crew planning planning Drydocking Drydocking Planning Planning Performance Performance Environmental Environmental Failure Failure of of critical critical equipment equipment and and systems systems Fire Fire and and Explosions Explosions Flawless Flawless Port Port state state control control performance performance Fuel Fuel Efficiency Efficiency HR HR Lost Lost Time Time Injuries Injuries Frequency Frequency Lost Lost Time Time Sickness Sickness Frequency Frequency Navigational Navigational Navigational Navigational Incidents Incidents NOx NOx emission emission performance performance Operational Operational Port Port state state control control deficiency deficiency rate rate Port Port state state control control detention detention Safety Safety Security Security SOx SOx emission emission performance performance Vessel Vessel availabilty availabilty Violations Violations of of MARPOL MARPOL

10 The Shipping KPI Standard - PIs Absconded crew Absconded crew Actual drydocking costs Actual drydocking costs Actual drydocking duration Actual drydocking duration Actual off-hire Actual off-hire Actual running Costs and Accruals Actual running Costs and Accruals Agreed drydocking costs Agreed drydocking costs Agreed drydocking duration Agreed drydocking duration Allision Allision Average number of vessel under Average number of vessel under management management Ballast water violations Ballast water violations Collision Collision Condition of class Condition of class Criminal offence Criminal offence Drug/alcohol abused Drug/alcohol abused Emitted Mass CO2 Emitted Mass CO2 Emitted Mass NOx Emitted Mass NOx Emitted Mass SOx Emitted Mass SOx Environmental Environmental Failure of critical equipment and systems Failure of critical equipment and systems Fatalities due to injuries Fatalities due to injuries Fatalities due to sickness Fatalities due to sickness Grounding Grounding HR HR Lost Workday Cases Lost Workday Cases No of crew not relieved on time No of crew not relieved on time No of dismissed crew No of dismissed crew No of logged warnings No of logged warnings No of violations of MARPOL Annex 1-6 No of violations of MARPOL Annex 1-6 Number of cases where a crew member is Number of cases where a crew member is sick for more than 24 hours sick for more than 24 hours Number of new cadets Number of new cadets Officer working days Officer working days Officers retention rate Officers retention rate Permanent Total Disabilities Permanent Total Disabilities Permanent Partial Disabilities Permanent Partial Disabilities Planned off-hire Planned off-hire PSC inspections resulting in zero PSC inspections resulting in zero Severe spills of bulk liquid Severe spills of bulk liquid Total Exposure Hours Total Exposure Hours Total no of contained spills of bulk liquid Total no of contained spills of bulk liquid Total number of accidental releases of Total number of accidental releases of substances covered by MARPOL, to the substances covered by MARPOL, to the environment environment Total number of cargo units/passengers Total number of cargo units/passengers transported transported Total number of damaged or lost cargo Total number of damaged or lost cargo units/passengers injured during cargo units/passengers injured during cargo handling handling Total number of damaged or lost cargo Total number of damaged or lost cargo units/passengers injured during voyage units/passengers injured during voyage Total number of explosion incidents Total number of explosion incidents Total number of fire incidents Total number of fire incidents Total number of navigational related Total number of navigational related Total number of operational related Total number of operational related Total number of port state control Total number of port state control inspections inspections Total number of PSC Total number of PSC Total number of PSC inspections resulting in Total number of PSC inspections resulting in a detention a detention Total number of recorded external Total number of recorded external inspections inspections Total number of safety related Total number of safety related Total number of security related Total number of security related Training days Training days Transport Work Transport Work Vessel running cost budget Vessel running cost budget Violation of rest hours Violation of rest hours AAE (Additional Authorized Expense) AAE (Additional Authorized Expense)

11 KPI: CO2 emissions The estimated CO2 efficiency in a calendar year. Measured per vessel for external communication (input to SPIs) Relevant PIs: Emitted Mass CO2 Transport Work KPI Value Formula= Emitted Mass CO2*10 6 Transport Work KPI Rating Formula= 100-(Z*KPI Value) Rating Parameters: Z=7 This KPI compares emitted mass of CO2 to the vessel s total transport work, hereby stating the value achieved (transport work) by the emission of CO2. As the PI Emitted Mass CO2 is to be given in tons, the PI s value is multiplied by 1 million to get the KPI value in g/transport work (tonmile, passengermile, TEUmile, etc).

12 KPI: CO2 emissions Calculation Example Relevant PIs: Emitted Mass CO2 Transport Work ton tonmile KPI Value Formula= Emitted Mass CO2*10 6 Transport Work * ,98g / tonmile KPI Rating Formula= 100-(Z*KPI Value) = 100 (7 * 4,98) = 65,1 Rating Parameters: Z=7 Some typical emission factors Ship Type Index unit CO2 NOx SOx LNG Tanker g/ tonmile 66,5 1,9 1,2 Z value to be updated (agreed), and need to be differentiated between ship size and other factors Chemical Tanker g/ tonmile 23,5 0,7 0,4 Crude Oil Tanker g/ tonmile 8 0,2 0,1 Bulk Dry g/ tonmile 7,6 0,2 0,1 Container g/ tonmile 96,5 2,7 1,7 Refrigerated Cargo g/ tonmile 124,3 3,5 2,2 RO-RO Cargo g/ tonmile 94,9 1,8 1,7

13

14 External Stakeholder Who are they? Intertanko Intercargo BIMCO ICS-ISF EEC USCoastGuards IMO AIACS OCIMF PI Clubs Paris MOU etc...

15 KPI Utilisation and Requirements External Interests External Stakeholders Roles Information Need Industry Financial Processes Customer SPI KPI Learning HSE Others PI

16 Utilisation of the Shipping KPI Standard Building Public Opinion External Communication Internal Improvement Fleet/Industry Benchmarking Used in relation to TMSA, evidence tracking Performance Based Contracting Measuring Policy Implementation Effects

17 Building Public Awareness / Reputation Long term effect of applying a performance standard: Utilising aggregated SPIs over time can be an effective and reliable measure of the industry s response to changes in policies and external conditions for the industry Communicating with legislators, insurance, politicians, environmental interests and media can be more accurate and simplified if objective performance data can be achieved through the use of a recognised standard

18 Shipping KPI Phase 2 - Content WP1: Develop Communication Model for External Stakeholders Evaluation of operational reporting aligned to the Shipping KPI Standard Express organisational performance based on vessel SPIs SPIs Interpretation and definition of performance levels WP2: Validation of Shipping KPI Standard Define a data capture methodology Perform model sensitivity and consistency analysis Evaluation of the data capture WP3: Develop Tool for Reporting and Benchmarking Specify functionality for data capture, calculation and presentation Implement prototype functionality for benchmarking Test the prototype with data from the validation

19 SW Architecture Benchmarking SW MARINTEK (TeCoMan) XML file Local KPI SW Local KPI KPI SW SW (any provider) Reporting SW (any provider) Legacy Systems (existing in-house systems) Maintenanace Personell Acounting Other

20 MARINTEK KPIMon - Demo