Presentation Six February 2012

Transcription

1 Presentation Six February 2012

2 Today s Presentation: Revenue Recap Project Prioritization Process DRAFT 2040 Project List

3 Revenue Estimation Based on data provided by each state Includes transit formula funds Assumes no new or special funds Includes modest annual increase

4 Financial Resource Outlook Estimated Revenues $23.1 billion - TIP $ 2.0 billion - Transit formula $ 5.6 billion - Highway O&M $ 5.4 billion = $10.1 billion available for multimodal projects

5 Ohio Distribution Available for List Projects 39% O&M (nondiscretionary) 29% Transit by Formula 30% Uncommitted 2%

6 Kentucky Distribution O&M (nondiscretionary) 10% Available for List Projects 67% Transit by Formula 21% Uncommitted 2%

7 Indiana Distribution Available for List Projects 35% O&M (nondiscretionary) 63% Uncommitted 2% Transit by Formula 0%

8 Why prioritize? Needs are many resources are limited Determine region s most important projects

9 Gather Data CMP Existing Plan Community Travel Model Initial Project List Apply Scoring Process ICC Review OKI Board Review Air Quality & Fiscal Constraint Project List

10 Project Scoring Process Applies to: Roadway Transit ITS Freight Bicycle Pedestrian

11 The Scoring Process General Criteria Score Total Score Mode Specific Score (Roadway, Transit or Freight)

12 General Criteria (60 points) Economic Vitality Air Quality / Energy Local Priority Multimodal / Intermodal Transportation &/or Comp Plan Environmental Justice Environment

13 Roadway Score (45 points) ADT / Facility Type Safety Impact on Safety Existing Congestion Level 2040 Level of Service LOS Impact Freight (% Truck) Feasibility

14 Transit Score (45 points) Ridership Impact Type Safety/Security Timing & Analysis Level

15 Freight Score (45 points) Impact on Roadway Congestion Mode Specific Traffic Flow Safety/Security Facility Type

16 Scoring Process Summary 600+ projects 3 states multiple sources Board approved process

17 DRAFT Plan List: Items REMOVED Non-federal aid projects local roadways new facilities that will not be functionally-classified Planning studies Already programmed TIP projects and duplicates Replacement buses considered a transit formula line item Projects considered O&M line items: minor roadway reconstruction (<$10 milllion) intersection improvements minor geometry improvements

18 Draft Plan List: Items INCLUDED Major roadway reconstruction (>$10 million) New roadway facilities Roadway lane additions New and modified interchanges Transit fleet expansion and capital investments New and expanded existing bike and pedestrian facilities Freight improvements ITS recommendations

19 Summary Inflation severely impacts the look of the OKI Plan, especially our Ohio counties. Delay of TRAC projects allows inflation to eat away at the projected revenue. At 3.5% inflation rate costs double in 20 years The impact is delayed and reduced public benefit especially safety, congestion and air quality

20 Available on the 2040 page Link provided in mail-out for this meeting

21 Total ID # County Score FACILITY/ PROJECT NAME Hamilton Brent Spence Bridge Hamilton SORTA: Walnut Hills Transit Hub Warren, Hamilton IR 71 Fields Ertel Interchange Warren Mason Montgomery Road Hamilton Reading Rd Grade Separation, Sharonville Hamilton, Clermont Eastern Corridor Oasis Line Segments 1, 2, 3 & 4 LOCATION DESCRIPTION (note: red text indicates TRAC project) IR 71/IR 75 bridge TRAC TIER 3; Construct new I-71/I-75 over the Ohio bridge adjacent to the existing BSB with River the exisiting bridge converted to handle local traffic. Bridge and approaches PID's 75119,89053, 89054, 89056, 89065, 89066, 89067, 89068, 89069, (HAM-IR71/IR /0.22 PID: 75119) Walnut Hills Major transit hub and other services in the area including pedestrian connections Interchange at Fields Ertel/Masonmontgomery TRAC TIER 2; PID: HAM/WAR Field Ertel/Mason Montgomery Int. Multimodal Improvements, new NB off ramp, intersection improvements etc. COST ESTIMATE (in current million dollars) Year of Construction (YOC) COST ESTIMATE (in Year of Constructi on $Millions ) Inflated Construction Year Running Cost ($M) Subtotal $ $1, $1, $ $4.89 $1, $ $33.02 $1, Fields Ertel to Widen one lane in each direction $ $9.38 $1, Socialville Fosters Road Reading Rd atgrade Review the Reading Rd grade crossing $ $39.10 $1, Norfolk hazards and preliminary work that was Southern railroad performed in order to prioritize the project crossing for federal funding. Oasis Rail Line (downtown Cincinnati to Milford) TRAC TIER 3; PID 86463; Fluegemann="Rail transit plus feeder bus. Four segments from downtown Cincinnati to Milford (1&2=from downtown Cincinnati to Fairfax / 3&4=from Fairfax to Milford). Includes development of transit rail facility and supporting infrastructure. Riverfront Transit Center to Cincinnati Boathouse Facility. $ $1, $2,498.11

22 What we need from you: Your input to refine the list Please send your comments to Robyn Bancroft by Next month we will be seeking your concurrence to take the list of projects to the public during our round of public meetings in April.

23 Bob Koehler Deputy Executive Director Robyn Bancroft Strategic Projects Manager Tel: (513) Fax: (513) is closer than you think!

24 COUNTY 2010 Population % Share of State Population Total Project Value ($M) # of Projects Butler 368, % $ Clermont 197, % $ Hamilton 802, % $5, Warren 212, % $ Boone 118, % $ Campbell 90, % $ Kenton 159, % $2, Dearborn 50, % $ STATE Ohio 1,580, % $5, Kentucky 368, % $3, Indiana 50, % $ TOTAL 1,999, % $9,