Appendix B. OKI 2030 Regional Transportation Plan Project Scoring Process. Ohio Kentucky Indiana Regional Council of Governments
|
|
- Andrea Anthony
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appendix B OKI 2030 Regional Transportation Plan Project Scoring Process
2 APPENDIX B OKI 2030 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN PROJECT SCORING PROCESS Background This scoring process is intended to assist selection of worthy capacity related roadway and transit projects for the. Its basis is a procedure originally adopted on February 13, 2004 by the OKI Intermodal Coordinating Committee and Board of Directors to evaluate Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and ODOT Transportation Review Advisory Committee (TRAC) projects. It has been adapted to fit the nature of the Regional Transportation Plan development. Most recently the criteria have been revised on November 30, 2007 to include consideration of freight and land use elements. The process makes best use of available data and points of emphasis in the federal transportation bill. Maintenance projects are not included since they are of high importance and are assumed to be part of the plan. This process provides a systematic approach to ranking the numerous projects which will need to be evaluated in the development of a financially constrained regional transportation plan. This is also an opportunity to incorporate the intent of SAFETEA- LU s eight planning factors. A numeric ranking for each project will be determined for a relative comparison with other projects. This scoring process is meant to provide information for decision making and development of a recommended list of projects in the plan. Public input and OKI leadership will determine the final recommended list of projects. The Project Scoring Process Several criteria are evaluated in the scoring process. The first five apply to all projects and provide a potential of 50 points. A project is then scored under the roadway or the transit sections, either of which provide a potential for another 40 points. Finally, all applications are subjected to a hybrid benefit/cost evaluation which can provide up to 10 additional points, giving a total possible of 100. A description of the criteria and the OKI Project Scoring Process follows. Overall Criterion 50 points possible Environmental Justice The Environmental Justice criterion addresses the emphasis placed on transportation impacts on minority, low income, elderly and zero-car household populations. Impacts could include such things as affects on travel times, division of neighborhoods, or increases in noise and air pollution. This is a subjective evaluation. Projects are awarded points as follows: Overall benefits (good to excellent) Overall benefits (fair to good) Overall benefits (none to fair) five points three points one point B-
3 Economic Vitality The economic vitality criterion awards points for projects that serve to support existing, expanding or new non-retail employment centers. Projects that have a significant positive impact are awarded five points. Otherwise a score of zero points is given. Air Quality/Energy The air quality or energy criterion relates to continued efforts to improve the regional air quality and encourage investment in more environmentally friendly forms of fuel use. As measures, the reduction in VMT (vehicle miles of travel), VHT (vehicle hours of travel) and Emissions Reduced will be considered to allocate up to 10 points. Depending on the intensity of the improvement, a subjective high (seven to 10 points), medium (four to six points), or low (zero to three points) score is assigned. Examples of these measures include installation of a natural gas refueling station (Emissions Reduced), intersection signal improvements (VHT reduced), construction of a new roadway link reducing circuitous travel (VMT reduced), a new bus on an existing route reducing headway (VMT and VHT reduced), a new compressed natural gas bus on a new route. Multimodal/Intermodal The multimodal or intermodal criterion awards points based on the project s ability to include and/or enhance more than the primary mode or specifically address freight needs. If the proposed project facilitates intermodal integration and connectivity, or includes design elements for more than one transportation mode up to ten points may be obtained. An example of multimodal integration would be a roadway reconstruction project that creates adequate space for bicycle use, even though a formal bike path is not part of the design. Another example would be a bus purchase by a transit operator where the specifications called for bicycle racks to be included. An example of multimodal investment is a roadway widening project that provides bus turnouts at designated bus stops, or a bus pre-emption feature in the traffic signal design. If a transit operator proposed a project for a park and ride lot or transfer center that also provided a linkage to an existing bike path and provided bike racks, the maximum of 10 points could be scored. Corridor Study/ Land Use Plan Recommendation The corridor study or land use plan recommendation criteria awards up to 10 points for projects identified as high priority through a formal corridor study or comprehensive planning process. This is meant to recognize the significant overall detailed planning invested in key transportation corridors. Important yet lower priority projects may be awarded five points and projects with little or no status relative to a corridor study or a comprehensive plan will be scored zero points in this category. Local/Regional Priority The local/regional priority criterion reflects the relative importance of each project as indicated by affected communities. It is important that OKI have a sense of the local situation and preference for solutions to transportation problems. Local communities are asked to review and prioritize all projects within their area. The prioritized project listings received from the city, county or state agencies are used to assign high, B-2
4 medium or low priority. Scoring is assigned 10, six or three respectively. Roadway Projects - 40 points possible Safety The safety criterion measures two facets. First, using a set of measures that deal with accidents per million vehicle miles (MVMT) and personal injury, a range of zero to five points are possible. This represents the current conditions of the location. A second set of measures assesses the impact the proposal will have on the existing situation, ranging from zero to five points. New facilities will be scored based on existing routes it is designed to alleviate, if any. Average Daily Traffic (ADT)/Facility Type The average daily traffic (ADT) or facility type combines two features which are a barometer of a roadway s significance in the regional system. This combination allows for the consideration of both current volume and functional hierarchy. This combination permits the roadways with high volumes to be assigned a high score even if the facility is not high on the functional class system. ADT and functional class are readily available. High volume roadways on the interstate system will score highly, up to five points. Low volume local roads will be scored lower. The scoring process table lists the ranges. Existing Congestion Level The existing congestion level uses observed travel time and delay estimates to assign up to five points for highly congested locations, three points for moderate congestion and zero for little or no congestion Level of Service 2030 Level of Service is a two-step criterion. Levels A through E/F produce scores ranging from one point to five points, based on forecasted 2030 conditions. The extent to which the proposal alleviates the future level of congestion has a range of zero to five points. If the proposal does not improve the congestion at all, zero points are awarded. Any new facility will be scored based on existing routes it is designed to alleviate, if any. Freight Corridors The freight corridors factor provides points for corridors based on percentage of truck traffic within the project area. Up to five points are awarded. Feasibility Some projects have merit but lack feasibility due to economic or social constraints, such as lack of political or public will, right of way availability or other issues. The feasibility criterion is an indication of the likelihood of a project to advance to construction or implementation based on these factors. Those projects which appear to be highly feasible will be scored five points. Those projects perceived as unfeasible will score zero points. Moderate and marginally feasible projects will score four and two points respectively. B-3
5 Transit Projects - 40 points possible Type The type of project being sought relates to the score as shown. The term type may include but not necessarily be limited to vehicle replacement, service support, fixed facilities such as park and ride, stations or bus barns and vehicle expansion. The range again reflects the importance of maintaining and supporting the existing service, as opposed to expansion activities. Projects can receive up to 10 points in this category. Ridership Impact An important component of transit projects is their ridership impact. Investments should be oriented to at least maintaining the existing ridership, if not increasing it. The scores of zero, seven, and 10 points echo this philosophy. Safety and Security The significance of the improvement to overall safety and security is reflected in the scoring range of from zero to 10 points. Timing and Analysis Level The sooner a proposal can be put in place, the sooner its impact will be felt in the region. Timing and analysis level is the criterion that assigns a value to this as follows. Projects which could be implemented within five years (matches transit operator s approximate long range planning horizon) are awarded 10 points. Improvements to, or expansion of the system, such as opening new transit hubs, that are anticipated to be implemented after five years and are included in a local planning study or transit development plan are awarded five points. Those that are anticipated to be implemented after five but are not included in a local planning study or transit development plan are awarded zero points. Benefit/Cost Ratio - 10 points possible The final scoring section makes use of a hybrid benefit/cost analysis. The extensive variability in project type and the amount of time it would take to do a true benefit/ cost analysis has led to the selection of this method. While cost is readily available, the benefit side is represented by a surrogate that is valued according to the score awarded up to this point for the subject proposal (the points, in effect, represent the intrinsic benefit to the region). The point subtotal (maximum 90) is divided by the cost of the proposal in millions. The subsequent value (which can have a very wide numerical range) is then scored from two to 10 points via the scale shown in the scoring process. When added to the previous subtotal, a maximum of 100 points is possible. B-4
6 OKI Project Scoring Parameters (page 1 of 2) ALL PROJECTS (50) TRANSIT PROJECTS (40) CRITERION MEASuRE POINTS CRITERION MEASuRE POINTS Benefits (good to excellent) 5 Type Bus replacement 0 Environmental Justice Benefits (fair to good) 3 Service support 8 Benefits (none to fair) 1 Fixed facility Economic Vitality Significant Enhancement 5 Vehicle Expansion 4 No Significant Enhance. 0 Other 2 Significant 7-0 Ridership Impact Increase 0 Air Quality (Emission Moderate 4- Maintain 7 Reduction) Low 0-3 No impact 0 Local/Regional Priority High 10 Safety/Security Essential 10 Medium Significant 8 Low 3 Moderate Multi/Intermodal 3+ mode or intermodal 0 Minimal 4 2 mode design 5 None 0 Primary mode only 0 Timing & Analysis Level Near term (< 5 years) 0 Corridor Study/Land Mid/long term & part of Use Plan High 0 local Plan (> 5 years) Recommendation 5 Moderate 5 Long term & not part of local plan (> 5 years) No status 0 Subtotal (add overall & transit) 0 Benefit/Cost Greater than (Subtotal points divided Greater than 00 8 by cost in millions) Greater than 10 Greater than 5 4 Greater than 2 Total Points (Maximum 100) B-5
7 OKI Project Scoring Parameters (page 2 of 2) ROADWAY PROJECTS (40) CRITERION MEASuRE POINTS Safety > 9 crashes per MVMT 5 > 7 crashes per MVMT 4 > 5 crashes per MVMT 3 > 3 crashes per MVMT 2 > crashes per MVMT Impact on Safety High impact 5 Medium Impact 3 Low Impact 0 ADT/Facility Type 40k+ or Freeway\Expressway 5 30k+ or Principal Arterial 4 20k+ or Minor Arterial 3 10k+ or Collector 2 Less than 0k or Local Existing Congestion Level High 5 (based on observed delay) Moderate 3 Little or none Level of Service E/F 5 D 4 C 3 B 2 A Level of Service Impact High impact 5 Medium Impact 3 Low Impact 0 Freight Corridors (% Truck) 25% or greater 5 20 to <25% 4 5 to <20% 3 0 to <5% 2 5 to <0% <5% 0 Feasibility High 5 Moderate 4 Marginal 2 Not feasible 0 Subtotal (add overall & roadway) B-
APPLICATION PACKET FOR OKI-ALLOCATED FEDERAL STP AND CMAQ FUNDS (OHIO PROJECTS)
APPLICATION PACKET FOR OKI-ALLOCATED FEDERAL STP AND CMAQ FUNDS (OHIO PROJECTS) www.oki.org Adopted April 6, 2004 Revised January 10, 2006; January 8, 2008; October 6, 2009 Table of Contents Introduction...
More informationThe Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.
4 Goals & Objectives INTRODUCTION The 2015-2040 MTP preserves and promotes the quality of life and economic prosperity of the MAB by providing a transportation system consistent with the regional goals.
More informationFebruary For more information, contact: Mark Paine, (513)
APPLICATION PACKET FOR OKI-ALLOCATED FEDERAL SNK FUNDS KENTUCKY PROJECTS February 2014 For more information, contact: Mark Paine, mpaine@oki.org (513) 619-7685 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Prioritization
More informationPresentation Six February 2012
Presentation Six February 2012 Today s Presentation: Revenue Recap Project Prioritization Process DRAFT 2040 Project List Revenue Estimation Based on data provided by each state Includes transit formula
More informationTri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017
Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017 One of the initial steps in the development of the TCRPC 2045 Metropolitan
More informationProposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Congestion Management Process
Proposed Comprehensive Update to the State of Rhode Island s Statewide Planning Program January 2018 Summary Outline of of Action Steps 1. Develop Objectives for Congestion Management What is the desired
More information1 I N T R O D U C T I O N
THE 2040 OKI REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN This is the metropolitan transportation plan for the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI). OKI is the federally designated regional transportation
More informationACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE. Memphis MPO March 30, 2015
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE Memphis MPO March 30, 2015 Agenda Welcome & Introductions Announcements and Briefings Livability 2040: Regional Transportation Plan Congestion Management Process
More informationContents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11
Contents i Contents 1 A New Transportation Plan... 1 Why develop a new plan?... 1 What area does the LRTP focus on?... 2 Why is this LRTP important?... 3 Meeting Requirements for Transportation Planning...
More informationBenefit-Cost Analysis in MPO Transportation Planning
Benefit-Cost Analysis in MPO Transportation Planning Mary Luebbers, Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments; Eric C. Gabler, Federal Highway Administration November 8, 2007 John A. Roebling
More informationPerformance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017
Measuring What Matters: Above and Beyond Requirements Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017 Presentation Overview Background - origin and evolution of the Regional Outcomes Framework. Regional Outcomes
More information2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan 2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018 Adopted June 13, 2018 250 S. Orange Ave, Suite 200, Orlando, FL 32801 407-481-5672 www.metroplanorlando.org MetroPlan
More informationCongestion Management Process (CMP)
Congestion Management Process (CMP) Introduction The Congestion Management Process (CMP) is a systematic, data-driven, and regionally accepted approach that aims to improve the performance of the transportation
More informationAppendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance
APPENDICES Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance D.1 Functional classification identifies the role a highway or street plays in the transportation
More informationChapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL
Chapter #9 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL TABLE OF CONTENTS 9.0 Travel Demand Model...9-1 9.1 Introduction...9-1 9.2 Overview...9-1 9.2.1 Study Area...9-1 9.2.2 Travel Demand Modeling Process...9-3 9.3 The Memphis
More information6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS
6.0 CONGESTION HOT SPOT PROBLEM AND IMPROVEMENT TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL ANALYSIS 6.1 MODEL RUN SUMMARY NOTEBOOK The Model Run Summary Notebook (under separate cover) provides documentation of the multiple
More informationAppendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance
Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance Functional classification identifies the role a highway or street plays in the transportation system. Some highways
More informationTransportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures
Mid-Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Mid-Region Council of Governments 809 Copper Avenue NW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 247-1750-tel. (505) 247-1753-fax www.mrcog-nm.gov Transportation
More informationThe Level of Service Metric and. Alternatives for Multi-Modal Transportation. in Oakland
The Level of Service Metric and Alternatives for Multi-Modal Transportation in Oakland By Jill Nevins For the City of Oakland, Public Works Agency Mills College Public Policy Program May 2012 Executive
More informationTransportation and Land Use Planning Connectivity
Chapter 3 Transportation and Land Use Planning Connectivity CHAPTER 3 Transportation and Land Use Planning Connectivity INTRODUCTION Transportation systems and services are provided in the context of both
More informationAPPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017
APPENDIX A - PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW FEBRUARY 2017 DENVERMOVES Transit Denver Moves: Transit APPENDIX A PLANS AND POLICY REVIEW 2035 Metro Vision Regional Transportation Plan (MVRTP) (2011) 2040 Fiscally
More information2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014
2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014 1 About the plan Long-range transportation plan for the Twin
More informationChapter 10 Goals, Objectives + Policies
Chapter 10 Goals, + Policies Warehouse on Nestle Way near I-78 114 115 10.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF CONSISTENT GOALS 10.2 NATIONAL FREIGHT GOALS The Lehigh Valley s freight transportation investment decisions
More informationCHAPTER 7. TRAVEL PATTERNS AND TRAVEL FORECASTING
CHAPTER 7. TRAVEL PATTERNS AND TRAVEL FORECASTING TRAVEL PATTERNS Northwest Arkansas has experienced unprecedented growth in population and employment in the past 25 years. The economic vitality and diversity
More informationMONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE
12 MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE The FAST Act continues the legislation authorized under MAP-21, which created a data-driven, performance-based multimodal program to address the many challenges
More informationMoving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan
Moving Forward 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Bicycle Mobility Master Plan Transit Master Plan Paul DiGiuseppe Assistant Chief, Division of Planning Department of Administration (DOA) Needed to keep
More informationCHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK
CHAPTER 2. VISION, GOALS AND MTP FRAMEWORK MTP VISION In order to create a framework for the 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), a vision statement was drafted by the Vision/Goals Committee and
More informationWebinar Series for Comprehensive Plan Updates. Transportation Overview
Webinar Series for Comprehensive Plan Updates Transportation Overview Presented by Michael Larson and Mark Filipi August 18, 2016 2040 Transportation Policy Plan Adopted January 14 th, 2015 Multimodal
More informationGOALS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES
PLANNING FRAMEWORK The planning framework guides the development of the Regional Transportation Plan, articulating what the region is trying to achieve. This chapter establishes a foundation to focus data-gathering
More informationAppendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY
Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY 2014 REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2014 RTP/SCS APPENDIX O SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
More informationAPPENDIX A PLANNING PROCESS FOR RURAL AREAS OF THE STATE
APPENDIX A PLANNING PROCESS FOR RURAL AREAS OF THE STATE Background SCDOT Statewide Transportation Planning Process Consultation Cooperation with Local Officials in Non-Metropolitan (Rural) Areas SCDOT
More informationMAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth
MAP-21 themes Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems Creates jobs and supports economic growth Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda Simplifies and focuses the Federal
More information10.0 Congestion Management Process
Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan 10-1 10.0 Congestion Management Process 10.1 CMP Summary The identification and evaluation of projects for the Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan
More information12 Evaluation of Alternatives
12 Evaluation of Alternatives This chapter evaluates the effectiveness of the No-Build Alternative and the proposed METRO Blue Line Light Rail Transit (BLRT) Extension project based on the information
More informationMEETING SUMMARY FOR APRIL 13, 2017
SARASOTA/MANATEE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Performance Measures/Project Prioritization Process Ad Hoc Committee 7632 15 th Street East Sarasota, Florida 34243 3:00-5:00 PM MEETING SUMMARY FOR
More informationHighest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP
Highest Priority Performance Measures for the TPP The following list of measures are the highest priority performance measures as identified by modal working groups. These groups consist of staff from
More informationLivability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. RTPAC #3 July 26, 2018
Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update RTPAC #3 July 26, 2018 1 Meeting Agenda Timeline Funding Scenarios Funding Availability Project Review Prioritization Process Ground Rules Next Steps
More informationRecommended Roadway Plan Section 3 Existing Facilities & System Performance
Recommended Roadway Plan Section 3 Existing Facilities & System Performance RECOMMENDED ROADWAY PLAN SECTION 3 Existing Facilities and System Performance 3.1 Introduction An important prerequisite to transportation
More informationVISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
VISION STATEMENT, MISSION STATEMENT, AND GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Vision Statement: Our vision is to provide a high quality, safe, efficient, and cost-effective multi-modal transportation system that supports
More informationAIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE EVALUATION GUIDANCE The following guidance provides additional details regarding the process followed by PSRC to evaluate projects for potential air quality benefits. As
More informationP4.0 Highway Quantitative Scoring Workgroup Recommendations
P4.0 Highway Quantitative Scoring Workgroup Recommendations May 18, 2015 Highway Project Scoring Overview Insert Table of Eligibility Statewide Mobility Regional Impact Division Needs Eligible Projects:
More informationAMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA
AMPO Annual Conference Session: Performance (Part 1) October 18, 2017 Savannah, GA Introduction: North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority NJTPA Congestion Management Process Study Goals Analysis
More information6 CHARTING PERFORMANCE
DRAFT 6 CHARTING PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW OF PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING Background of Performance Based Planning Increasingly, over the past two decades, transportation agencies have been utilizing performance
More informationSurface Transportation Block Grant Program
Scoring Criteria Guide Surface Transportation Block Grant Program 2019 Call for Projects For the St. Louis Region Guidance Document for STP-S Project Evaluation TABLE OF CONTENTS Overview...3 Road Project
More informationLivability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. RTPAC #4 October 16, 2018
Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update RTPAC #4 October 16, 2018 1 Meeting Agenda Timeline Financial Plan Update o Adopted Funding Scenario o Revenue Projections Prioritization Process Round
More information2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies
2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies INTRODUCTION The guiding principles for the 2040 MTP Update establish the vision and key focus areas for this planning effort. They combine the guidance
More informationCorpus Christi Metropolitan Transportation Plan Fiscal Year Introduction:
Introduction: Traffic congestion in the Corpus Christi Metropolitan area is not as much a function of population growth as the function of the increase in single occupant trips. Using census data, the
More information3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES
3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES The station spacing and siting guidelines are summarized in Table 3-1. Table 3-1 also includes benchmark information for local transit service and express bus as
More informationProject Evaluation Criteria
Project Evaluation Criteria Goals and Objectives were developed to guide Envision 35 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Update. These guiding principles were based on the requirements included in the
More informationCongestion Management Process 2013 Update
OVERVIEW OF THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROCESS Traffic Congestion In The Dallas-Fort Worth Region With the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) urban area as its center, the North Central Texas region
More information2040 Long Range Transportation Plan
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Presented by Iowa Northland Regional Council of Governments October 22, 23, and 24, 2013 Liaison for federal transportation funding that goes to local cities and counties
More information2035 Long Range Transportation Plan space coast transportation Planning organization
FINAL REPORT 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan space coast transportation Planning organization PREPARED by: Renaissance Planning group JanuaRY 2011 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...
More informationMOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:
Mobility 2045: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas is the defining vision for the multimodal transportation system in the Dallas- Fort Worth Metropolitan Planning Area. The plan,
More informationLong Range Transportation Plan Project Status Update
HEPMPO Webinar Meeting Long Range Transportation Plan Project Status Update Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Foursquare Integrated Transportation Planning December 4, 2013 1 Meeting Agenda 1. Project Overview 2.
More informationSummary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans
SMTC 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan Appendix A: Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans SMTC 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan Summary of transportation-related
More informationSOUTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE. Sustainable Communities & Transportation Planning
SOUTHEAST FLORIDA REGIONAL COMPACT CLIMATE CHANGE Draft Regional Climate Action Plan Sustainable Communities & Transportation Planning SP-1 Develop criteria in collaboration with municipal and county planning
More informationMobility and System Reliability Goal
Mobility and System Reliability Goal Provide surface transportation infrastructure and services that will advance the efficient and reliable movement of people and goods throughout the state. Background:
More information3. THE RANGE OF PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR EVALUATION
Prioritisation process for funding of competing Transport related projects (Auckland Perspective) Ayokunle Martins (Land Transport Programme Coordinator) Auckland Regional Transport Authority ABSTRACT
More informationGUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM
M E T R O P O L I TAN TRA NS P O RTATI O N PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM El Paso Metropolitan Planning Organization INTRODUCTION The guiding principles for development of the El Paso MPO s Destino
More informationChapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies
Chapter 3 - This chapter presents goals, objectives, and strategies that have been developed as part of the Richmond Area MPO 2026 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) update. Strategies have been developed
More informationWhat Can be Done: Integrated Approach for I-95 in Philadelphia
What Can be Done: Integrated Approach for I-95 in Philadelphia NYSMPO Conference June 22, 2015 DVRPC DVRPC is the MPO for nine-county, bi-state Philadelphia region Population = 5.5 million people Employment
More informationSince the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a Mission,
, and ODOT s Updated, and Since the Vision 2000 effort under taken in 1995, ODOT has operated under a, Vision, and. These were updated in 2000 and are updated again here by Senior Leadership to reflect
More informationCHAPTER 4. Existing Roadway Conditions. Highway Element. Kanawha County Putnam County
CHAPTER 4 Highway Element Existing Roadway Conditions The challenges facing the future of the transportation network in the Kanawha Valley are a collective result of reliance on passenger vehicles for
More information7.0 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
7.0 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT I. Introduction/Current State of Transportation Management in KC Region The Kansas City region has invested considerable effort and resources in the design and implementation
More informationFuture Build Alternative Traffic Forecasts and Level of Service Analysis
4.2.10 Future Build Alternative Traffic Forecasts and Level of Service Analysis For the five Build Alternatives, study intersections within one mile of potential station locations were analyzed, as it
More informationMAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports
MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports September 20, 2012 American Association of Port Authorities 703.684.5700 www.aapa-ports.org 3 New Freight Eligibility in Core Highway Formula Programs Surface Transportation
More informationBridges Prioritizing Criteria and Measures
Bridges Prioritizing Criteria and Measures August 17, 2017 Definition: A bridge rehabilitation or replacement project located on a non Freeway Principal Arterial or A Minor Arterial functionally classified
More informationTransform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016
Transform 66 Multimodal Project: Prioritization Process and Evaluation Criteria Approved March 3, 2016 The Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the Transform 66: Inside the Beltway Project directs NVTC to
More informationStaunton-Augusta-Waynesboro Metropolitan Planning Organization
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Adopted December 2, 2015 i Staunton-Augusta-Waynesboro Metropolitan Planning Organization Policy Board Officers: Chair, Jeffrey Moore Augusta County Vice Chair, Bruce
More informationIntroduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01
Pg. 01 Introduction The Alamo Area recognizes the importance of transportation performance tracking, goal setting and measurement to provide greater accountability and transparency and to achieve a more
More informationCITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES 3.20.2017 PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 802.295.4999
More informationREGIONAL SOLICITATION ROADWAY APPLICATIONS: POTENTIAL CHANGES. TAB September 20, 2017
REGIONAL SOLICITATION ROADWAY APPLICATIONS: POTENTIAL CHANGES TAB September 20, 2017 2 2016 Application Categories Bridge Incorporate Highway Truck Corridor Study Tiers instead of Freight Project Elements
More informationCongestion Management Process. Procedures and Responsibilities Report
Congestion Management Process Procedures and Responsibilities Report Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization June 2011 The Congestion Management Process Procedures and Responsibilities
More informationRegional Transportation Performance Measures
Regional Transportation Performance Measures March 5, 2014 Presented by Tom Murtha Regional Transportation Performance 2 Measures: Introduction Regional Transportation Performance Measures address needs
More informationDes Moines Area MPO. MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization
Des Moines Area MPO MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, 2014 2014 Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization Agenda 1. Call To Order 2. VOTE: Approval of Agenda 3. VOTE: Approval of Meeting
More informationChapter 2 Transportation Policy Plan Strategies
Chapter 2 Transportation Policy Plan Strategies As discussed in Chapter 1, the current federal transportation law, Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), mandates a streamlined and performance-based
More informationEIGHT PLANNING FACTORS
EIGHT PLANNING FACTORS Under the provisions of SAFETEA-LU, all Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) are required to consider eight (8) broad planning factors in the development of multi-modal transportation
More informationMTP VISIONS, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES
2 MTP VISIONS, GOALS, AND OBJECTIVES El Paso MPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2. GUIDING PRINCIPLES This chapter describes the process by which the vision and goals of the planning process were
More informationAdministration and Projects Committee STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: Subject Summary of Issues Recommendation Financial Implications Options Attachments Changes from Committee Innovate 680 (Project 8009) Authorization to Issue Request for Proposals (RFP) No.
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-12 RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN: 2017-2020 WHEREAS, the Southeastern
More informationTable of Contents LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF MAPS CHAPTER 1: REGIONAL GOODS MOVEMENT: LINKS TO OUR PAST AND TO OUR FUTURE
Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF MAPS iv v vi CHAPTER 1: REGIONAL GOODS MOVEMENT: LINKS TO OUR PAST AND TO OUR FUTURE Strategic Freight Plan Intent 1-2 Study Area 1-4 CHAPTER 2:
More informationIMPLEMENTING THE PLAN
IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN SELECTED KEY MESSAGES 1. Protect the Core Functions. Assuming a stable revenue and cost scenario, the financial analysis indicates that there are likely enough resources to cover
More informationDatabase and Travel Demand Model
Database and Travel Demand Model 7 The CMP legislation requires every CMA, in consultation with the regional transportation planning agency (the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in the Bay
More informationGoing Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility (Plan) and why does the region need a Long Range Transportation
More informationCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION/ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION/ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1.1: INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE FREDERICKSBURG AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (FAMPO) Established in 1992, the Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan Planning
More informationMPC 6.a - Attachment 2 - All STP-U/TAP Funding Applications Page 118 of 128. STP-U & TAP Application Form Page 1 of 6. Tom Boyatt or Brian Barnett
MPC 6.a - Attachment 2 - All STP-U/TAP Funding Applications Page 118 of 128 STP-U & TAP Application Form Page 1 of 6 APPLICATION FOR: STP U FUNDS (Project Development, Preservation, Modernization) TAP
More informationAppendix O Level of Service Standard and Measurements
July 8, 2016 Appendix O. Appendix O Standard and Measurements Definition Level of service (LOS) is a mechanism used to determine how well a transportation facility is operating from a traveler s perspective.
More informationTEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: DRAFT KEY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: DRAFT KEY POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS Texas Freight Advisory Committee Midland August 14, 2014 Draft Key Policy Recommendations August 14, 2014 2014 Freight Mobility Plan Recommendations
More informationChapter 3 Plan Development Framework
Chapter 3 Plan Development Framework Contents Guiding the Way... 1 PLAN 2040 Vision and Goals... 1 Goal: Lead as the Global Gateway to the South... 1 Goal: Encourage Healthy Communities... 2 Goal: Expand
More informationHighway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan. TAB September 20, 2017
Highway and Freight Current Investment Direction and Plan TAB September 20, 2017 Today s Topics Where are we now, what are the current issues? Where do we want to go? How will we get there? What are the
More informationFY 2019 Unified Planning Work Program FINAL. Regional Intergovernmental Council. June 14, Kanawha Putnam Metropolitan Planning Organization
FY 2019 Unified Planning Work Program FINAL Regional Intergovernmental Council Kanawha Putnam Metropolitan Planning Organization June 14, 2018 315 D Street. South Charleston, WV. 25303 The Unified Planning
More informationLivability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. RTPAC #1 January 18, 2018
Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update RTPAC #1 January 18, 2018 INTRODUCTIONS What does your involvement look like? As a member of the committee, you can help by: o Providing direction for
More informationREQUEST FOR PROPOSAL KIPDA REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN MARCH 30, 2018
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL KIPDA REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN MARCH 30, 2018 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL KIPDA REGIONAL FREIGHT PLAN The Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency (KIPDA), the designated Metropolitan
More informationMAP-21 Planning Factors & Performance Measures Technical Report
MAP-21 Planning Factors & Performance Measures Technical Report Table of Contents Introduction 1 Summary Checklist 2 Scope of Planning Process / MAP-21 Planning Factors 3 Planning Factor One 3 Planning
More informationTraffic Data Quality Analysis. James Sturrock, PE, PTOE, FHWA Resource Center Operations Team
Traffic Analysis James Sturrock, PE, PTOE, FHWA Resource Center Operations Team Source Material Traffic Measurement http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/jpodocs/repts_te/14058.htm Seven DEADLY Misconceptions about Information
More informationDraft MAP-21 Planning Factors & Performance Measures Technical Report
Draft MAP-21 Planning Factors & Performance Measures Technical Report Table of Contents Introduction 1 Summary Checklist 2 Scope of Planning Process / MAP-21 Planning Factors 3 Planning Factor One 3 Planning
More informationThe Role of Transportation Systems Management & Operations in Supporting Livability and Sustainability
The Role of Transportation Systems Management & Operations in Supporting Livability and Sustainability Michael Grant, ICF International February 7, 2012 NTOC Webinar Highlights of FHWA/FTA Primer Background:
More informationAppendix E Technical Description of the Modeling Framework
Appendix E Technical Description of the Modeling Framework Appendix E Technical Description of Modeling Framework Appendix E Technical Description of Modeling Framework 1 In general terms, what analysis
More information