Hamburg Port Railways. Harald Kreft, Head of HPR, B-1

Transcription

1 Hamburg Port Railways Harald Kreft, Head of HPR, B-1 1

2 Railway infrastructure of HPR in the Port of Hamburg Mühlenwerder Waltershof Hamburg Süd Alte Süderelbe Hohe Schaar Hausbruch 2

3 Railway infrastructure of HPR principle sketch of the net River Elbe (north) CTB TCT CTS HBS EUK WHO HP Rethe Rethebridge ASE CTA Kattwykbridge HOS Reiherstieg River Elbe (south) Hausbruch main marshaling yards of HPR main container terminals infrastructure of DB AG infrastructure of HPR 3

4 Statistical dates Hamburg Port Railway rail infrastructure bridges switches switching and marshaling yards trains per day freight cars per day rail transport companies 281 (+ 289 km private sidings) (+ 800 on private tracks) 3 systems with 7 railway control centres 220 >

5 Liberalisation of the rail market yesterday net and transportation in charge of the HPR today only one owner and operator of the net = HPR many several railways for transportation Today 57 different rail transport companies are using the infrastructure of the HPR. 5

6 Freight Transport Volume main hinterland routes Norway: 32 trains/week Denmark: 14 trains/week Sweden: 22 trains/week Lithuania: 10 trains/week Port of Hamburg: Europe s major cargo-rail reloading point! More than trains a week! Russia: 16 trains/week Netherlands: 6 trains/week Switzerland: 40 trains/week Czech Republic: 24 trains/week Austria: 54 trains/week Poland: 56 trains/week Slovakia: 30 trains/week Ukraine: 12 Züge/Woche Italy: 42 trains/week Hungary: 43 trains/week Quelle: HHM Planmäßige wöchentliche intermodale Verbindungen von/nach Hamburg (Containerzüge) 6

7 Quayside railway key data 230 freigth trains every day 60 direct trains to / from Hamburg 160 trains in Railion administration 70 trains in private rail transport companies port total HPR 30 % total come up of the port port total HPR 55 % of Hinterland transportation port total HPR 75 % in long distance traffic (> 150 km) 7

8 Port of Hamburg main hinterland routes rail water ways feeder ferries 8

9 Cargo handling Port of Hamburg total 20,0 18,1 15,0 10,0 5,0 0, ,3 4,7 5,4 6,1 7,0 total 134,8 8,1 bulk goods bulk commodity 42,7 8,9 9,9 12, ,1 total 221,6 172,8 48, doubling of container handling from 2006 to 2015 container handling in Mio. TEU total cargo handling in Mio. t 9

10 Port of Hamburg development paths 1. new handling areas are generated by redeployment of areas not being used efficiently anymore poured since improvement and customization of existing areas ca. 10 m Spur 18 m Verkehrs- und Lagerbereich Straddle Carrier 15,1 m Spur 35 m Kai-Vorschuhung Verkehrsbereich Straddle Carrier Lagerbereich mit Stapelkranen 3. extension into the port expansion areas 10

11 Cargo and Wagon Handling prognosis Masterplan 2015 container transport PoH (in Mio. t) container transport HPR (in Mio. TEU) 19 4, , ,5 2 1, , freight trains per day (2007) 400 freight trains per day (2015) doubling of container handling in total from 2006 to 2015 triplication of container transport on rail from 2006 to

12 Masterplan 2015 expansion of the rail system to Hamburg main station to Lübeck adjustment and modernisation of Waltershof and Mühlenwerder adjustment of Hamburg Süd development of the HABIS-IT-system connecting tracks Waltershof enlargement Alte Süderelbe (northern part) 2nd track northern connection station Altenwerder East extension of station Ross fly-over Wilhelmsburg to Berlin direct connection Waltershof - Seehafenbahnhof to Stade/Cuxhaven connection HPA DB Netz southern connection Altenwerder Kattwykbridge new crossing of southern River Elbe southern connection to DB Netz adjustment of Hohe Schaar connection Seehafenbahnhof projects of HPR (total) main infrastructureprojects of HPR main-line railway HPR connections to DB Netz main-line railway DB Hausbruch to Hannover/Bremen Unterelbekreuz 12

13 HABIS IT-system for the Port of Hamburg and HPR 13

14 HPR changes in the facility condition tracks switches E L B E 5% 2% 5 % 2 % 30 % tracks switches 30 % 31 % 44 % 46 % 25 % 30 % Waltershof 62 % 8 % 93 % Alte Süderelbe Hansaport Altona K Ö HL BR A N D Mühlenwerder Altstadt tracks switches NOR D ER E L B E 71 % Hamburg Süd Bf Hamburg Süd 15% 18 % 15 % 11 % 10 % 75 % 255 Peute n. Berlin Billwerder 0% 0% 100 % tracks switches caption Legende: Hafenerweiterungsgebiet Zone II actually not reconditioned Hausbruch Grün: conversion bis 2007 volume erneuert 2008 Blau: conversion Erneuerung volume innerhalb km Rot: Noch zu erneuern nach % 0% 100 % Alte Süderelbe 7 Altenwerder R E T H E S Ü D E R E L B E R EIHERST E G Hohe Schaar Wilhelmsburg 1 15 % 22 % 13 % 72 % 62 % 16 % tracks switches reconditioned facilities in 2008 W G L [m] Who Ct AS Hos Hbs

15 Charging System basics 1. basic components for allocation of infrastructure 2. components for individual usage of infrastructure a. usage-dependent components for the use of service facilities (tracks of categories I III, marshaling humps, customs) b. time-dependent components as incentive for the effective use of facilities (exceeding standing times on tracks of categories I III) 15

16 Charging System principals / time flow the use of the infrastructure incurs a fee if freight cars are using the infrastructure longer than the standard time, they are charged additional time-dependent fees 16

17 Charging System 2008 improvement approaches and potentials RTC with obviously better development than the average average standing times of freight cars on category I are strongly decreasing reach a level far below the average hardly ideal split-up of freight cars on all categories - short standing times on category I - categories II and III used for average and long standing times 16,0h 14,0h 12,0h 10,0h 8,0h 6,0h 4,0h 2,0h 0,0h average standing time per freight car in category I - HHO KW-1 KW-2 KW-3 KW-4 KW-5 KW-6 KW-7 KW-8 KW-9 KW- 10 KW- 11 KW- 12 KW- 13 KW- 14 KW- 15 KW- 16 freight cars all 600 RTC-Z 500 linear (all) linear (RTC-Z) dispersal of standing times (week 14) 524 2,1 h 6,0 h ,2 h h 20 h 15 h 10 h 5 h 0 h KAT-1 KAT-2 KAT-3 HHO 17

18 Charging System 2008 improvement approaches and potentials adjustment of standing times from extreme timeouts the best 95 % of freight cars in category I reach standing times < 5 h 12,0h 11,0h 10,0h 9,0h 8,0h 7,0h 6,0h 5,0h 100% of freight cars 95% of freight cars 4,0h 3,0h 2,0h 1,0h 0,0h KW-1 KW-2 KW-3 KW-4 KW-5 KW-6 KW-7 KW-8 KW-9 KW- 10 If the cycle of 5 % of the freight cars was designed like the cycles for the other 95 %, the standing times in 2009 will stick to the average. KW- 11 KW- 12 KW- 13 KW- 14 KW- 15 KW

19 Charging System 2008 improvement approaches and potentials structure of standing times in track category I - HHO cars cars 32% 5% 56,6 h 63 % of freight cars very good (ø 2,3 h) to the standard standing time (5 h) gathered freight cars h 42% h 20% h 38% total standing times cars 63% share on time allocation 20 % heavy trial by 5 % of freight cars produce 42 % of temporal rail occupancy (ø 56,6 h) <=5h 5h 22h 1/3 of freight cars (32 %) reaches average timeouts 2,3 h 8,8 h >22h temporal rail occupancy 38 % <=5h 5h 22h >22h average standing time per freight car 19

20 Masterplan 2015 coordinated solutions and results 1. implementation stage short-term / to be realised promptly, examples: three track extension Stelle/Lüneburg extension of Hausbruch outrun tracks for rail freight transport Hamburg / Berlin 2. implementation stage realisation until 2015 necessary, examples: new buidling Y-Trasse Hamburg / Bremen / Hannover two track extension Uelzen/Stendal 3. implementation stage long-termlang / beyond 2015, examples: three to four track extension Stelle/Uelzen extension Harburg/Lauenbrück Güter- Umgehungsbahn Maschen Bremen Bad Oldesloe Buchholz Neumünster Hamburg Uelzen Lübeck Lüneburg Hannover 20

21 Thank you for your attention! Harald Kreft Head of HPR B-1 Hamburg Port Authority AöR Hafenbahn Alter Wandrahm 14 / Hamburg 21

22 Development in Shipping Modal Split 2007 container development (TEU) total traffic (t) 30 % 17 % 45 % 40 % 9 % 1 % 24 % road slightly decreasing rail increasing inland navigation steady feeder slightly increasing 34 % 22

23 Port of Hamburg multimodal logistics hub Of 100 containers, going through the Port of Hamburg containers 45 containers 15 containers 30 containers are loaded or unloaded in the port (LCL). are being transported either from Hamburg to the hinterland or from the hinterland to the Port of Hamburg. (70 % by train in long distance transports) are being transported to the economically important area of Hamburg. (80 % by trucking) are transit cargo to the area around the baltic sea or to Scandinavia. (ca. 80 % by feeder) Hafen Hamburg Marketing 23

24 Cargo handling reference period January April 2007 / 2008 Port of Hamburg total Cargo handling total TEU total ,5 % +5,2 % t t TEU TEU Hamburg Port Railways Cargo handling total TEU total ,7 % +12,9 % t t TEU TEU 24

25 Adjustment of rail share reason: doubling of cargo handling by 2015 seagoing vessel / feeder inland water vessel 2006: 8,9 Mio. TEU 2015: 18.1 Mio. TEU 2006: 0,1 Mio. TEU 2015: 0,5 Mio. TEU Hafen road rail 2006: 3,4 Mio. TEU 2015: 4,7 Mio. TEU 2006: 1,6 Mio. TEU 2015: 4,5 Mio. TEU 25

26 Port of Hamburg extension of terminal capacities CT Burchardkai CT Tollerort westward enlargement CT Eurogate CT Eurogate free-port central area CT Altenwerder available Moorburg extension, redeployment future possibilities 26

27 Organisation chart Hamburg Port Authority City of Hamburg 27