Eligible projects for the blending call

Transcription

1 Eligible projects for the blending call Jornada informativa sobre fondos CEF-Transportes 16 March 2017 Carlo DE GRANDIS MOVE B1 TEN-T Policy Coordinator 1

2 Funding objective 1 interventions eligible under the 2017 CEF Transport MAP call Funding Priority Pre-identified projects on the corridors of the Core Network (*Part I point 2) Pre-identified projects on other sections of the Core Network (*Part I point 3) MAWP Indicative budget: million** million** Co-funding rate: 40% (20%***) Co-funding rate: 20% of the eligible costs, which may be increased to a maximum of: 30% for projects addressing bottlenecks and 40% for projects on cross-border sections

3 Railways - Priorities Cross-border projects, including those that ensure connection between two Member States via a third country Projects accelerating the removal of bottlenecks Projects improving railway safety, including the deployment of the railway radio communication system (GSM-R) Projects addressing connections between rail and other modes of transport, in particular inland waterway and maritime transport

4 Road sector: types of interventions Works on cross-border sections of the Core Network only Compliance with the road and tunnel safety directives No support for maintenance

5 Road sector: Eligible infrastructure components (Article /2013) High-quality roads (motorways, express roads or conventional strategic roads) Parking and rest areas >>> Work Programme 3.2.2, Safe and Secure infrastructure Associated equipment (equipment for traffic management, information and route guidance, for the levying of user charges) Telematic applications, including ITS >>> Work Programme 3.3.2, ITS Freight terminals and logistic platforms Connections of the freight terminals and logistic platforms to the other modes Coach stations

6 Funding objective 1 - ERTMS BUDGET: 100 million (MAP general envelope) SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: ERTMS Track-Side (TS) deployment/upgrade, WORKS ERTMS On-Board (OB) retrofit/upgrade, WORKS CO-FUNDING: - ERTMS: max 50% of the el. costs - Infrastructure works (TS): max 40% of the el. costs

7 ERTMS Track-side deployment (1/2) Principles: - Baseline 3 only - Core Network with priority to cross-border sections of Core Network Corridors (CNCs) - New and constructed lines - Infra works (for L2), e.g. interlockings, RBC equipment - GSM-R: only as a part of ERTMS (L2)

8 ERTMS Track-side deployment (2/2) Costs: - ERTMS deployment: ceiling of 260k/km of double track line (incl. Hard/Software, ETCS, GSM- R for L2) Section double track > a double track equivalent - no ceiling (actual costs + justification): - ERTMS upgrade - Infra works (L2)

9 Principles: Costs: - B3 only ERTMS On-board deployment - Existing vehicles (already in operation) only - Works: Retrofit / Upgrade from B2 to B3 - ERTMS retrofit: ceiling of 250k/ERTMS OBU (incl. Hard/Software, ETCS, GSM-R if applicable) - no ceiling (actual costs + justification): - Prototype - ERTMS upgrade

10 ERTMS Application -OB/TS: separate applications - OB/TS: scope in 1 or more Member States - OK! - GSM-R: ERTMS L2 (with ETCS) only - Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (No CBA) Rail ERTMS TS combined: - ERTMS TS on the same sections as rail works - Rail and ERTMS TS presented separately (tech/fin) - ERTMS requirements (info, ceilings) to be applied

11 "Ideal" proposal TS: ERTMS Application - Include requested information (see c) considering if deployment or upgrade (e.g certificates and declarations of the existing subsystem for upgrades) - > 1 section: 1 activity = 1 section - Address call deliverables - Milestones: Identify milestone per deliverable - Infrastructure works: separate activity(ies)

12 ERTMS Grant Agreement - Based on application and evaluation, but takes into account call requirements, e.g.: - Deliverables (identified in the WP) - Costs, in line with ceiling - Description: Concise, quantitative info on the scope, deliverables, milestones (per deliverables) - Activities TS: usually 1 activity per section - Activities OB: usually up to 2 (if prototyping) activities per vehicle type

13 ERTMS Project implementation - Final meeting: demonstration ride/ RBC visit - Dedicated tech. support: Deployment Management Team - DELIVERABLES: - demonstrate implemented of the scope in line with the TSI CCS and EU legislation - EU authorisation process - ultimate verification of completion (regardless of final meeting) - provide ASAP, preferably once available and well before the planned submission of the FPC - incompleteness/ lack of TSI compliance demonstration might lead to a payment reduction/rejection - Involve NoBo(s) and NSA(s) as soon as possible!

14 Track-side deployment deliverables: - Engineering rules and operational scenarios - Interoperability risks with mitigation measures (Approval process). Collaboration with the DMT strongly recommended - Test results (incl. operational scenarios) - EC decl. and EC cert. of conformity of iop. constituents - EC decl. and EC cert. of verification of the TS subsystem - Filled template of technical compatibility details - Application file for NSA Authorisation (Authorisation if available at the final payment stage) 14

15 On-Board deployment deliverables: - Tests reports in line with TSI CCS (use of accredited laboratories required, ISO17025) - EC decl. and EC cert. of conformity of iop. constituents - EC decl. and EC cert. of verification of the OB subsystem - Filled template of technical compatibility details - Application file for NSA Authorisation (Authorisation if available at the final payment stage) 15

16 BUDGET: 50 million (MAP general envelope) SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES: 1) Interoperability (IOP) of the rail system as set out in Directives (UE) 2016/797 and 2008/57/EC: focus on TAF and TAP TSI 2) Railway system compliance with IOP, Safety Dir. and TEN-T Guidelines: focus on TSIs other than TAF/TAP CO-FUNDING: Funding objective 1 Rail interoperability Max 40% eligible costs works only 1 or more MSs

17 Interoperability of the rail system Focus on TAF/TAP TSI, supporting e.g.: quality management of data for TAP TAP implementation by SMEs stakeholders to develop a common Telematics Reference Files IMs/RUs to develop an unique Train ID compliant with TAP/TAF IMs, Wag.-keepers, RUs, etc. for implementation of TAP/TAF compliant databases and/or tools IMs/RUs for TAP/TAF compliance of the systems' functions, e.g. El. Consignment Note, Train Running Info, Path Request, Service Disruption, Train Preparation, intermodal info, etc.

18 Application "Ideal" proposal for Rail IOP: - clear definition of scope, incl. identification of deliverables per activity - justification of costs - ref. to TSIs, other applicable law, call objectives - > 1 Spec. obj.: group activities per a Spec. obj. - demonstration of EU added value, e.g.: - Foresee feedback to ERA - Knowledge sharing with Rail stakeholders

19 Funding objective 2 - Safe and secure infrastructure, on the road core network Funding Priority Projects on the Core Network (*Part I) MAWP Indicative budget: Co-funding rate: million 20% * Annex I of CEF Regulation 1316/2013

20 Main objectives Ensuring compliance with the requirements of the Tunnel Safety Directive 2004/54/EC and of Directive 2008/96/EC on infrastructure safety management Eliminating level crossings between the Core rail Network and roads Providing safe and secure parking areas along the motorway part of the TEN-T core network Funding possibilities for Works

21 Funding Objective 2: Innovation Point in the work programme: Deployment of innovation and new technology actions in all transport modes, ref. the TEN-T Guidelines, Art.33 (a to d). Main features of the 2017 blending call: Works as a follow-on of "Pilot activities" previously done: "market-sided innovation", but now "experiments are over Relative to corridors Combination of grant and loan Real trials / Pilots Focus: New tech ready for deployment, unit costs are brought down, and client's needs are understood!

22 Scope of the proposed actions Article 33 points a) to d): In order for the Comprehensive Network (includes Core Network) to keep up with innovative technological developments and deployments, the aim shall be in particular to: (a) support and promote the decarbonisation of transport through transition to innovative and sustainable transport technologies; (b) make possible the decarbonisation of all transport modes by stimulating energy efficiency, introduce alternative propulsion systems, including electricity supply systems, and provide corresponding infrastructure. Such infrastructure may include grids and other facilities necessary for the energy supply, may take account of the infrastructure-vehicle interface and may encompass telematic applications; (c) improve the safety and sustainability of the movement of persons and of the transport of goods; (d) improve the operation, management, accessibility, interoperability, multimodality and efficiency of the network, including through multimodal ticketing and coordination of travel timetables;

23 FO2: Innovation Call type MAP General(*) Type of Actions Works Budget 140 million Support rate Maximum 20% Must be supported by a CBA

24 Actions supported Contributing to decarbonistion of transport by the roll-out of Alternative Fuel Distribution infrastructure Electrcity (electro-mobility) Hydrogen Compressed or Liquefied Natural Gas (L/CNG) Priority to Bio-methane Other: incl. IT systems, storage, transportation units,

25 Specific points regarding eligibility: Mobile equipment(i.e. vehicles) Mobile infrastructure (i.e. concerning moving parts of infrastructure) Interface between infra & vehicle 5 years in the EU Scrubbers are not eligible

26 Funding Objective 3: Motorways of the Sea (MoS) Deploying an alternative clean fuels infrastructure - environmentally sustainable shipping Improving maritime transport integration in the doorto-door logistics chain Upgrading or establishing new maritime links, including combined investments in ports Promoting wider benefits such as Maritime Safety, Traffic Management, Human Element/Training

27 MoS Pillar I Deployment of alternative clean fuels and green shipping 1/2 Technologies reducing CO2 (climate change) Facilities for LNG, methanol and other clean fuels in ports and aboard vessels incl. bunkering barges Technologies reducing NOx emissions On-shore power supply systems for ships Batteries Energy efficiency measures on ships (hull, propellers, reblading etc) Technologies reducing SOx (scrubbers only for installations going beyond the scope of current legislation) Facilities for oil and other ship waste in ports Facilities for sludge from scrubbers Waste water / Ballast water treatment systems 27

28 MoS Pillar II - Port infrastructure development & upgrade of maritime links Develop the port infrastructure, handling facilities, freight terminals, logistic platforms and freight villages together with improved port access Develop reliable short sea shipping transport services integrated within door-to-door logistics chains and connecting core network corridors Improve logistics and administrative ICT management systems Increase safety and security during port handling operations Increase the environmental performance of ships on 28

29 MoS Pillar III Safety/Human Element/Traffic Management Safety operations (surveying, AIS, vessel control) Vocational training VTMS Wider benefit actions Addressing industry needs widely (e.g. coherent investments in a group of ports for LNG) Implementation works Upgrade of maritime links (minimum ship and port investments combined) 29

30 MoS Budget & conditions 40 million euros (30% for infrastructure works and facilities - implementation projects) Submission by at least two applicants from two different Member States (and support of those) Upgrade of maritime link: Involvement of at least 1 core port, 1 comprehensive port and 1 maritime operator on the link concerned

31 Specific Conditions for MoS 1/2 Submission by at least two applicants from two different Member States (and support of those) Upgrade of maritime link: Involvement of at least 1 core port, 1 comprehensive port and 1 maritime operator on the link concerned Only dedicated lines serving the applying ports Vessel upgrades are limited to the additional efforts for environmental purposes or other ancillary investments Ships to serve the MoS line for 5 years after end of Action Significant port investments of at least 50% of project budget

32 Examples of MoS 'ideal' proposals under the Blending Call Upgrade of MoS link including installation of LNG propulsion on ro-ro ship, construction of new railway access to core port X and extending a ro-ro terminal in comprehensive port Y. (Two EU countries) Construction of LNG bunkering facilities in the cluster of ports in a given geographical location combined with the construction of a bunkering vessel

33 Funding Objective 3: Multimodal logistics platforms Contribute to: - optimising the performance of multimodal logistic chains - shifting freight transport from road to other more sustainable modes Budget: 20 million; Total eligible costs in excess of 10 million*

34 Actions supported a) Connection to existing freight terminals (e.g. access infrastructure) b)interconnection between existing freight terminals and particularly more sustainable modes of transport c) Development of existing freight terminals (e.g. adaptations for 740 m train length) d) but Proposals must be located in one (or several) core airport, core maritime port, core inland port or core rail-road terminal, as identified in Annex II part 2 of the TEN-T Guidelines.

35 General conditions Eligible investments: small scale ancillary infrastructure, ICT equipment and applications etc. Results of the action: no selective advantage to specific operators and accessibility on a non-discriminatory basis (i.e. open access). Type of actions: works only Maximum co-funding rate: 20%

36 e.g.: Adaptation to 740 m train length and electrification of tracks. Installation and purchase of ICT equipment for gate automation Improve last mile connection to the terminal ---NOT--- Connections to and development of new freight terminals Actions aiming at directly increasing the capacity of freight terminals Buildings / offices, superstructures, storage and warehouses, parking, cranes, conveyors, other devices for moving freight and mobile assets such as locomotives

37 Funding Objective 3: Single European Sky (SES) Aim: to improve ATM performance in Europe through Modernisation and harmonisation of ATM systems Synchronised deployment Increased civil-military cooperation Reducing fragmentation Consolidation of ANS provision

38 SES - A) Common projects: 6 AF covered by the Pilot Common Project (PCP) Essential operational changes Mature Synchronisation & coordination Member States have to verify consistency with their adopted performance plans (EU 390/2013) and that national civil-military coordination has taken place. Extended Arrival Management (AMAN) & Performance Based Navigation (PBN) in high density TMAs Airport Integration & Throughput Functionalities Flexible Airspace Management (ASM) & Free Route Network Collaborative Management Initial System Wide Information Management (i SWIM) Initial Trajectory Information Sharing (i4d)

39 SES - B) Other projects: 1. Deployment of new technologies and best practices 2. Specification and deployment of new generation of flight and radar data processing systems 3. Optimal provision of air navigation services in the context of FABs 4. Deployment and support to the deployment of ATM functionalities defined in the ATM Master Plan and the deployment baseline not included in the Common Projects. What: a) Early implementation of instrument approaches utilising PBN to phase out legacy navigation instruments as well as airborne infrastructure that support the use of satellite based augmentation system, in particular EGNOS. b) Actions that support equipage with 8.33 KHz radios in existing aircraft fleet. (Regulations EC N 1265/2007 & 1079/2012)

40 SES - Budget available MAP 2017 MAP Call General 40 million a) Common Projects 80% b) Other projects 20% Type of project Max. support MAP General/Cohesion Land-based equipment 50% On-board equipment 20%

41 Funding Objective 3: urban nodes Nodes to be seen as integral part of corridors The origin and / or destination of most longdistance trips and a place where majority of related challenges (congestion, air quality ) persist thus the need to invest more in urban nodes Locations of major transport nodes (maritime and inland ports, airports, other terminals) Interfaces of long-distance and local/regional transport; calling for integrated, innovative, sustainable, efficient and high-quality solutions Focus for early deployment of clean fuels and ITS 41

42 Budget & Eligibility Call Budget Threshold Co-fin. rate General 10 m Min total eligible costs = 10 m 20% (only works) Geographic eligibility : - Actions located in urban nodes listed in Annex II part 1 (Core Nodes) of the TEN-T Guidelines and/or - Annex II part 2 which are located on a Core Network Corridor. 42

43 Specific objectives of the call Action addressing : Physical bottlenecks and missing links between transport modes in the urban area Seamless connection between the TEN-T long-distance transport and the urban transport (for example through integrated planning, through quality standards etc.) Multi-modality, shift to more sustainable mode, shift to alternative fuels and enhance the integration of longdistance and urban transport Mobile equipment: Must remain for at least 5 years registered and operated in a Member State Only the financial difference between a conventional solution and the use of a new technology 43

44 Look for INEA! 44