Nuclear Energy Seminar. Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. Status of. Nuclear Engineering Division

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Nuclear Energy Seminar. Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. Status of. Nuclear Engineering Division"

Transcription

1 Nuclear Energy Seminar March h2012 Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi Status of Nuclear Energy Project in Thailand Mr. Sh Saharath hboonpotipukdee Nuclear Engineering Division Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand

2 Contents NPP Plan NPP Infrastructure Development INIR Mission and Readiness Report Current Challenges On-going Activities 2

3 History and Background In 1966, EGAT proposed a nuclear power plant project In , The feasibility study and site selection were conducted 1970, Ao-Pai was selected to be a nuclear power plant site In 1972, Thai government approved the BWR-type reactor with 600 MWe In 1974, The uranium fuel contract was signed with ERDA In 1976, EGAT proposed to call for bidding In 1978, the proceeding with nuclear option was 12 Mar 2012 suspended Status of Nuclear Energy Project in Thailand 3

4 History and Background (Cont d) In , Nuclear site investigation was conducted. In 1995, Detailed analysis of candidate sites were performed. In 1996, The cabinet appointed the committee to study the feasibility of nuclear power plant in Thailand. In 1997, Economic Crisis. 4

5 Thailand Nuclear Power Development GWh Solar/wind Biofuel Hydro Gas Oil Coal 12 Mar

6 Current Nuclear Power Program Plan PDP 2007 ( ) 4x1,000-MWe NPP in 2020(2) and 2021(2) PDP 2007 Revision 2 ( ) 2021) 2x1,000-MWe NPP in 2020 and 2021 PDP 2010 ( ) 2030) 5x1,000-MWe NPP in , and 2028 PDP 2010 revision-2 (March 2011) After Fukushima Accident 4x1000-MWe NPP in and Revising PDP 2x1000-MWe NPP in 2026 and 2027? 6

7 NPP Infrastructure Development 7

8 National Energy Policy Council (NEPC) Ministry of Energy NuclearPower Infrastructure Establishment Cooperation Committee Nuclear Power Program Development Office (NPPDO) Setup on Jan 31, 08 Dr.Norkun Sitthiphong Director Assistant Director Experts Nuclear Power Infrastructure Cooperation Division Nuclear Power Utility Planning Cooperation Division Public Communication and Acceptance Division Central Management Division 8

9 Nuclear Energy: Major Role Players Policy Maker Ministry of Energy NPPDO Regulatory Body OAP Operator EGAT Technical Support Organization i TINT 9

10 Infrastructure Development Program (IAEA Milestones) Nuclear power option included within the national energy strategy Milestone 1 Ready to make a Knowledgeable commitment to a nuclear programme Milestone 2 Ready to invite bids for the first NPP Milestone 3 Ready to commission and operate the first NPP gramme opment Prog cture Develo Infrastruc 3 yr 100%@12/2010 Phase1 Consideration before a decision to launch a nuclear power programme is taken 3 yr 6 yr Phase 2 Preparatory work for the construction of a NPP after a policy decision has been taken Phase3 Activities to implement a first NPP Phase 4 Maintenance and continuous Infrastructure improvement 12 Mar Status of Nuclear Energy Project in Thailand 10 Source : IAEA Report 2007 NG-G

11 Infrastructure Development Program (IAEA Milestones) Nuclear power option included within the national energy strategy Milestone 1 Ready to make a Knowledgeable commitment to a nuclear programme Milestone 2 Ready to invite bids for the first NPP Milestone 3 Ready to commission and operate the first NPP gramme opment Prog cture Develo Infrastruc 3 yr 3 yr 100%@12/2010 Phase1 Consideration before a decision to launch a nuclear power programme is taken 3 yr 6 yr Phase 2 Preparatory work for the construction of a NPP after a policy decision has been taken Phase3 Activities to implement a first NPP Phase 4 Maintenance and continuous Infrastructure improvement 12 Mar Status of Nuclear Energy Project in Thailand 11 Source : IAEA Report 2007 NG-G

12 Infrastructure Development Program (IAEA Milestones) st st

13 Pre-Project Activities Phase ( ) Major activities include: Commence the work on infrastructure establishment to accommodate a nuclear program Survey potential sites for construction and perform initial environmental examination Complete nuclear power plant pre-feasibility study including human resources development plan Promote public communication and participation 13

14 Nuclear Power Plant Pre-Feasibility Study 1. Energy Economics and Financing 2. Technical and Safety Aspects of Nuclear Power 3. Fuel Cycle and Waste Management 4. Reactor Technology, Reactor Supplier and Fuel Supplier Selection 5. Site and Environmental Study 6. Human Resources Development and Management Aspects 14

15 Human Resource Development Seminars, workshops, and trainings from IAEA, nuclear vendors and EGAT s partners Fundamentals course Advanced d course Diploma program OJT Belgium(GDF-SUEZ), China(CGNPC) Oversea Study Master s Degree program (Korea) 15

16 EGAT HRD Training Course in China (CGNPC - China Guangdong Nuclear Power Company) 16

17 EGAT HRD Training Course in Japan TEPCO, Kashiwasaki-Kariwa Kariwa 17

18 Public Knowledge Program ORGANIZATIONS IN PUBLIC INFORMATION Public 18

19 Organizations in Public Information Office of Atoms for Peace (OAP) Thailand Institute of Nuclear Power Program Electricity Generating Nuclear Technology Development Office Authority of Thailand (TINT) (NPPDO) (EGAT) 19

20 Public Knowledge Program COMMUNICATION MEDIAS Nuclear journal, magazine, newsletter Brochure, handbooks, posters, painting book Radio Program TV Documentary Multimedia E-learning Webpage Social Network 20

21 Public Knowledge Program PUBLIC INFORMATION ACTIVITIES Exhibitions EGAT hold about 40 exhibitions in many provinces. About 30,000 students and people attended in these exhibitions. Seminars Nuclear Power Program seminars were organized by TINT/EGAT to Office of Government local community leaders Nuclear Tour visit operating Nuclear Power Plant and nuclear facilities 21

22 (a) Exhibitions OAP / TINT / EGAT hold about 50 exhibitions in many provinces. About 69,000 students and people attended d in these exhibitions. 22

23 (a) Exhibitions Nuclear Power Plant Model exhibitions were very attractive to secondary school students high school students as well. 23

24 (b) Seminars Nuclear Power Program seminars were organized by NPPDO/EGAT to students in high schools & universities local community leaders 24

25 (c) Nuclear Tour TINT open house 4,123 Visitors from various organizations i interested in nuclear technology. - School -University - Office of Government Their understanding increase 90% more than before. 25

26 International Co-operation IAEA ASEAN+3 nuclear co-operation operation program CGNPC Chinese Utility JAPC Japanese Utility JAEA Research Institute Hitachi Nuclear Vendor 26

27 INIR Mission and Readiness Report 27

28 INIR Mission (Integrated Nuclear Infrastructure Review) Thailand had carried out the self-evaluation and submitted a report to IAEA in October 2010 IAEA experts had come to Thailand during Dec 13-18, 2010 to conduct an INIR mission 28

29 19 Infrastructure Issues for INIR Mission 1. National position 2. Nuclear safety 3. Management 4. Funding and financing 5. Legislative framework 6. Safeguards 7. Regulatory framework 8. Radiation protection 9. Electrical grid 10. Human resources development 11. Stakeholder involvement 12. Site and supporting facilities 13. Environmental protection 14. Emergency planning 15. Security and physical protection 16. Nuclear fuel cycle 17. Radioactive waste 18. Industrial involvement 19. Procurement Significant Action Needed Minor Action Needed No Action Needed 29

30 Main Conclusion The INIR Mission Team reviewed all of the 19 issues based on the IAEA reference documents. The Team concluded that based on the progress in addressing 19 issues, which will be included in Readiness Report, Thailand can make a knowledgeable decision on the introduction ti of nuclear power. 30

31 Major Gaps (1) 1. No official statement demonstrating the Government s commitment to the safe, secure and peaceful (non-proliferation) implementation of nuclear power for the long term National Position 2. Nuclear Regulatory Body is not independent Nuclear Safety 3. No evidence of commitment to ensure appointment t of leaders with appropriate training i and experience for leadership and the management of safety Nuclear Safety 31

32 Major Gaps (2) 4. No evidence showing understanding of the ultimate responsibility of the operator for safety Nuclear Safety 5. Human Resources Development Plan for the regulator side is not sufficiently detailed for Milestone 1 -HRD 32

33 Good Practices (1) 1. Authorization system for controlling possession and use of nuclear materials, Identification of the responsible person and submission with the license application 2. NPP siting preparation activities, which conducted in a systematic way and covered in NPP Pre-FS by EGAT s consultant 3. Significant ifi improvement of the security framework through effective implementation of the recommendations from the IAEA IPPAS Mission 33

34 Good Practices (2) 4. Utility s studies for inclusion of an NPP into the existing and future national electrical grid, which covers all the necessary aspects and are well documented 5. The Utility s HRD Plan, which has considerable scope and depth, addressing all elements required by Milestone 1 and has already included nuclear familiarization training for many staff 6. Study on Strategic Environmental and Siting Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Project by Chulalongkorn University, which is a comprehensive report addressing the environmental issues and siting 34

35 Readiness Report (1) NPIECC and sub-committees had prepared Readiness Report to submit to National Energy Policy Council (NEPC) for consideration to proceed to Phase 2 (Project Implementation) Contents 1 Thailand NPP Policy and Development 2 Evaluation of Thailand Infrastructure for Supporting NPP Project Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure INIR Mission 3 Activities in the Next Phases 4 Conclusions and Suggestions 35

36 Readiness Report (2) Nuclear Power Development Office had submitted Readiness Report to Ministry of Energy at the end of 2010 NPP project is postponed 6 years to fill major gaps and promote public understanding of NPP 36

37 Current Challenges National position Political instability Government commitment Public acceptance Promoting understanding and participation Site survey and data collection Infrastructure Preparation Laws and regulations for nuclear power Independent nuclear regulatory body 37

38 Pre-Project Activities Phase On-going Activities Public communication, education and participation Lessons learned from Fukushima Accidents NPP Technical and Safety Reviews NPP Site Selection Reviews Emergency Preparedness and Response Infrastructure Preparation Laws and regulations for nuclear power Human resource development 38

39 Thank You for Your Attention 39