Integrating Maintenance Management Systems (MMS) with Maintenance Decision Support Systems (MDSS)

Transcription

1 Integrating Maintenance Management Systems (MMS) with Maintenance Decision Support Systems (MDSS) Fred Klein, Noblis Paul Pisano, Federal Highway Administration William Hoffman, Nevada DOT Richard Glassco, Noblis MDSS Meeting September 16-17, 2009 Contact:

2 What the Talk is About MMS = Maintenance Management System MDSS = Maintenance Decision Support System The untapped potential to automatically exchange data between these two systems 2

3 Agenda Overview of MMS and MDSS Benefits and Issues for Using MDSS data in MMS Benefits and Issues for Using MMS data in MDSS Steps for Data Exchange Options for Developing Data Interchange Capabilities 3

4 Overview of MMS Maintenance Management Programs are used to: track material and labor assets and expenses formulate and choose among strategic maintenance plans Assist with mid- and long-range maintenance decision making: Performance targets Measure outcomes Prioritization of tasks Methods of data input into MMS include: manual entry flat file from other programs mobile data collection from maintenance staff with PDAs mobile data collection from instrumented vehicles 4

5 MMS Screen Capture Nevada DOT 5

6 Current MMS Providers Some are internal programs written by DOTs Complex systems developed under contract to DOTs includes payroll and other personnel asset management functions Commercial programs such as Agile Assets OMS Boshung SCM Stand-alone or combined with Asset Management Programs such as SAP 6

7 How Feeding MDSS Data into MMS Would Work MDSS produces road forecasts and treatment recommendations as files MDSS with AVL also retains data on actions of when, where, and how much treatment was used to be able to update inventories of materials in MMS These output files are converted to an exchange format and transmitted to MMS MMS reads in data files MMS uses the material, labor, and equipment levels in its inventory levels and checks treatment plans for feasibility If there are multiple possible plans, MMS can compare costs for each MDSS treatment plans used as basis for entry of actual treatments or actual actions are recorded 7

8 Pictorial Concept of Operations for MDSS to MMS Data Transfer Road data Forecast data Sensor data Feasible options MDSS Users Road forecasts & treatments Same data formatted for exchange Database of labor and material assets MMS Logistics for treatment plan Plan is Amounts of labor & material executed 7 th Clarus & 11 th MDSS Stakeholder Meetings, used September 14-17, 2009, Charlotte, NC Outcome 8

9 Benefits of Using MMS Output Data in MDSS MDSS can have the benefit of knowing available inventory levels and locations of treatment materials MDSS can have the benefit of knowing available levels and location of labor and equipment MDSS can adapt treatment rules of practice from MMS to produce treatment plans closer to standard procedures 9

10 Overview of MDSS MDSS is a computer-based decision support tool to aid DOTs actions in snow & ice control An amalgam of data, models, and algorithms Uses weather forecasts, current weather observations, and customized rules of practice Produces road-specific forecasts and recommendations for road treatment Several studies have documented savings in labor hours and materials used for road treatments One Load of Salt per Storm = $500,000 minimum (10 tons/ld x 50 $/ton x 1,000 trucks) Indiana DOT reports savings: $10m in materials, $1m in labor 10

11 MDSS Screen Capture Federal Prototype 11

12 Current MDSS Providers National Center for Atmospheric Research (prototype) Meridian Environmental Technology Telvent DTN Vaisala Boschung 12

13 Overview of Integrating MMS and MDSS NOT combining two programs into one Firewalls would protect individual State/Cnty programs Feeding MMS inventory and procedural data into MDSS for improving MDSS road treatment recommendations Feeding MDSS treatment recommendations, actual treatments, other real-time conditions into MMS to improve timeliness and accuracy of asset tracking Creating common formats to enable data exchange among MDSS and MMS systems from different providers 13

14 MDSS MMS Maintenance Vehicles in Field Maintenance Office Computer with MMS and MDSS software Vehicle Sensor Data: location, speed, air temp., pavement temp., pavement friction, plow position, chemical application rate, etc. Vehicle Sensor Data Vehicle Sensor Data MMS Database Separate storage if needed Resource Data storage MDSS Interface 14

15 Benefits of Using MDSS Output Data in MMS Proposed treatment plans can be entered automatically rather than manually MMS can check feasibility of MDSS recommendation and weigh availability/cost considerations to choose among multiple options Actual treatments can be entered automatically, improving timeliness and accuracy Road conditions from vehicles can support real-time performance monitoring by snow & ice managers 15

16 How Feeding MMS Output into MDSS Would Work Adapt treatment rules of practice from MMS into MDSS Feed changes in inventory levels and resource availability into MDSS whenever they change in MMS MDSS recommendation could then be based on rules of practice and resource availability 16

17 Pictorial Concept of Operations for MMS to MDSS Data Transfer Database of labor and material assets MMS Logistics for treatment plan Rules of practice Updated resource levels Same data formatted for exchange Plan is executed Road data Forecast data Sensor data Feasible options MDSS Users Road forecasts & treatment s 17

18 Operational and Administrative Issues for Data Transfer between MDSS and MMS How frequently would the data transfer occur (depends of frequency of MDSS update and MMS update) Does the same office administer both systems? If not, coordination must be negotiated. Are the programs administered at the state, division, or local level? Coordinating across levels may be tricky. MMS frequently resides behind a firewall for personnel security issues Format of data transfer must be developed 18

19 State DOT+ Interviews 19

20 Options for Developing MDSS Interfaces National lab to provide a prototype Hold competition for commercial MDSS providers Investigate Boschung option (both MDSS and MMS) DOTs ask their suppliers to provide the capability Pooled fund pursues open development, e.g., following system engineering process 20

21 Options for Developing the MMS Interfaces State DOTs could request the capability from their providers State DOTs build the capability internally Multi-state effort (e.g., pooled fund study) could develop the capability MMS providers pursue development on their own or team up with an MDSS provider 21

22 Conclusions Part 1 MDSS and MMS systems are widely deployed There are multiple providers for both systems The operation of each system could be enhanced with input from the other The data each program uses is similar but not identical 22

23 Conclusions Part 2 Technical issues Must develop common exchange format Must modify programs to use new data Administrative issues Does the same agency operate both MMS and MDSS? Data security issues for in-house MMS Proprietary data or algorithms 23

24 Conclusions Part 3 Several Approaches for bringing about integrated capabilities: Nationally-led effort Designated commercial provider(s) Competition among providers Consortium of state-level users Free-market approach 24