Slide 1. A Free sample background from
|
|
- Hilary Henderson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Slide 1
2 Slide 2 Office of Access Design
3 Slide 3 * TOPICS * Office of Access Design Scheduled Activities Definitions Being Being Customer Friendly Designer s s Requirements Access Access Appeal Process Questions & Answers
4 Slide 4 Office of Access Design Major Access Permits for Developers NJDOT Capital Projects along State Highways Scoping Core Group member for Feasibility Assessment & Final Scope Development Designer of Access for In House designed projects Review/coordination of Access being designed by consultants Administration of property owner notification & appeals Projects along State Highways being proposed by developers that require a MAJOR ACCESS PERMIT Review /coordination of Major Access Permit applications Appeals (Developer projects impacting driveways beyond developer s s property)
5 Slide 5 Manager Office of Access Design John Jones Project Manager Diane Thompson Management Assistant Anika James Principal Clerk Typist Joseph Romero Manny Capili Team 1 Project Engineer Project Engineer Team 2 Rich Gering Principal Engineer Rick Thayer Principal Engineer Access & Wireless Communications Jeff Taylor Engineering Tech 2 Wireless Communications Jerry Domino Principal Engineer Sid Hooper Principal Engineer Joann Petti Principal Engineer Andrea Baj Principal CADD Tech MaryAnne Janes Principal CADD Tech
6 Slide 6 SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES
7 Slide 7 Access Plan & Access Cutouts Beginning in Feasibility Assessment (FA) and continuing through Final Scope Development (FSD) the designer of record is responsible for an overall project access plan. As a project progresses the available project information will also be refined. As such, an overall project access plan will also evolve.
8 Slide 8 Access Activities By Pipeline Prel Des Final Des 1150 PL-1 1 or 2 PL PL-1 1 or 2 PL PL-1 1 or 2 PL PL-1 1 or 2 PL PL-1 1 or 2 PL PL-1 1 or 2 or 3
9 Slide 9 Final Scope Development Activities Initiate Access Impacts (1) coordination between BPSD (Group Manager), Designer, PM & OAD to identify access impacts (existing access) ) of various project schemes. (2) OAD s s initial review of consultants identification, recommendation and justification of any warranted waivers. (3) OAD attendance at Scoping Core Group meetings and any associated public information meeting. (4) OAD will provide each designer with a copy of our guidelines. Included as a handout for this training.
10 Slide 10 Final Scope Development Activities Prepare Access Plans (1) once a project s s geometry/alignment has been defined, an overview plan will be prepared by the designer. (2) this plan will depict existing & proposed access for each property within the project limits. (3) OAD will coordinate with the designer regarding the requirements for the plan and the access code.
11 Slide 11 Final Scope Development Activities Conduct Access Review (1) OAD s s review the designer s s access plan for compliance with access code requirements. (2) OAD s s coordination with BPSD, designer, PM to resolve any problems. (3) OAD attendance at Scoping Core Group meetings and any associated public information meeting.
12 Slide 12 Initial Design Development Prepare Access Cutouts (1) OAD will coordinate with the designer regarding the requirements for this activity. (2) OAD will verify there is consistency between the access developed during the scoping process and the initial design phase. (3) For all in house designed projects, OAD is the designer for the access cutouts and will coordinate with Geometrics (Production Management) for required information. (3) OAD attendance at all required meetings and any associated public information meeting.
13 Slide 13 Initial Design Development Review of Access Cutouts (1) For all consultant designed projects, OAD will review the individual property access cutouts for consistency with our guidelines. (2) OAD will meet with the designer and each PM s s to coordinate the completion of this activity. (3) For ALL REVOCATIONS OF ACCESS,, OAD will verify that the designer has analyzed and addressed the access code requirements for REASONABLE ALTERNATIVE ACCESS.
14 Slide 14 Initial Design Development Administration Mods & Revs (1) OAD will prepare property owner notification letters, attach cutouts and send by certified mail (2) If property owner appeals, schedule informal meeting * Manager, MAP * OAD (supervisor & case manager) * DAG (as needed) * ROW * PM * Designer (as needed) * Property Owner (including reps - engineers & lawyers) (3) Hold informal meeting and address owner concerns (4) Prepare response to owner based on informal meeting (5) Address any subsequent correspondence or appeals
15 Slide 15 Responsibility for Access Design for Capital Projects = Office of Access Design
16 Slide 16 It is suggested that if any other NJDOT units are used as a resource for any potential access impacts, that YOU remember that it will be the Office of Access Design that will ultimately be administering the individual property notifications. We would recommend that the Office of Access Design be included in all reviews.
17 Slide 17 DEFINITIONS
18 Slide 18 Definitions are like belts. The shorter they are, the more elastic they need to be. By stretching it, it can be made to fit almost anybody.
19 Slide 19 Classification of Departmental Access Activities Revocation of Access (N.J.A.C. 16: d) 4.33d) Modification of Access (N.J.A.C. 16: c) 4.33c) Adjustment of Access (N.J.A.C. 16: b) 4.33b)
20 Slide 20 Revocation of Access
21 Slide 21 Revocation of Access 1. Eliminating DIRECT INGRESS 2. Eliminating DIRECT EGRESS 3. Eliminating DIRECT INGRESS and EGRESS AND Providing alternative access to a street, highway, easement, service road or common driveway other than the subject State highway
22 Slide 22 Revocation of Access Example 1: Eliminating direct ingress Before After
23 Slide 23 Revocation of Access Example 2: Eliminating direct egress Before After
24 Slide 24 Revocation of Access Example 3: Eliminating direct ingress and egress Before After
25 Slide 25 REVOCATION OF ACCESS What is Reasonable Alternative Access?
26 Slide 26 Revocation of Access Reasonable Alternative Access Commercial Property Access onto any parallel or perpendicular roadway* which is of sufficient design to support commercial traffic and is convenient, direct and well marked Industrial Property Access onto any improved roadway* which is of sufficient design to support necessary truck/employee access as required by the industry Residential/Agricultural Property Access onto any improved public street or highway * street-highway highway-easement-service service road-common driveway
27 Slide 27 Revocation of Commercial Access Reasonable Alternative Access Five Tests 1. Alternative access is provided via a parallel or perpendicular street, highway, easement, service road or common driveway 2. Of sufficient design to support commercial traffic to and from the business or use 3. Convenient 4. Direct 5. Well-marked means of reaching the site and returning to the State highway See Next Slide for Legal Determinations
28 Slide 28 Reasonable Alternative Access Five Tests Legal Definitions Upheld at OAL Hearings PERPENDICULAR = Any street that intersects a highway, OR PARALLEL = Any street that intersects a perpendicular street SUFFICIENCY OF DESIGN = Path can carry the size & type of traffic for commercial use Capacity to handle anticipated volume of traffic (as of the date of notice to owner) Pavement strength to handle the weight of anticipated traffic Driveways must handle anticipated volume, size & type of vehicles CONVENIENT = When Ingress & Egress Fits with the site Lines up with traffic circulation aisles Serves loading areas, drive-ups windows, etc. DIRECT = Relatively straight & limited choices along the path WELL-MARKED = Signs provided to direct motorists from the existing ingress to the alternative ingress and from the existing egress back to the highway Signs provided at each place where a motorist will have to make a decision
29 Slide 29 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 1A Perpendicular Streets (Any street that intersects a highway) State Highway
30 Slide 30 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 1B Parallel Streets (Any street that intersects a perpendicular street) State Highway
31 Slide 31 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 2 Sufficiency of Design The path can carry the size and type of traffic for the commercial use Capacity to handle the anticipated volume of traffic, as of the date of the notice to the owner Pavement strength to handle the weight of the anticipated traffic Driveways must handle anticipated volume, size and type of vehicles
32 Slide 32 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 3 Convenient Do the alternative ingress and egress: Fit with the site? Line up with traffic circulation aisles? Serve loading areas, drive-up windows, etc.?
33 Slide 33 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 4 Direct Relatively straight There are limited choices along the path
34 Slide 34 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Well-marked Signs are provided to direct motorists from the existing ingress to the alternative ingress and from the existing egress back to the highway A sign will be provided at each place where a motorist will have to make a decision Signs: 8 square feet White message on blue or green background Maintained for at least one year
35 Slide 35 Alternative Access Signing
36 Slide 36 Revocation of Commercial Access Recommended Sign Placements Site is upstream or downstream of Alternative Access Highway is undivided or divided
37 Slide 37 Revocation of Commercial Access Recommended Sign Placements Site is upstream of Alternative Access Highway is undivided
38 Slide 38 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is UPSTREAM of Alternative Access) SITE SHOPPING CTR XX Undivided State Highway
39 Slide 39 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is UPSTREAM of Alternative Access) SITE SHOPPING CTR XX Undivided State Highway
40 Slide 40 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is UPSTREAM of Alternative Access) SITE SHOPPING CTR XX Undivided State Highway
41 Slide 41 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is UPSTREAM of Alternative Access) TO SITE 31 XX Undivided State Highway
42 Slide 42 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is UPSTREAM of Alternative Access) SITE SHOPPING CTR XX Undivided State Highway
43 Slide 43 Revocation of Commercial Access Recommended Sign Placements Site is upstream of Alternative Access Highway is divided
44 Slide 44 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is UPSTREAM of Alternative Access) SITE SHOPPING CTR XX Divided State Highway
45 Slide 45 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is UPSTREAM of Alternative Access) SITE SHOPPING CTR XX Divided State Highway
46 Slide 46 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is UPSTREAM of Alternative Access) SITE SHOPPING CTR XX Divided State Highway
47 Slide 47 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is UPSTREAM of Alternative Access) TO SITE 31 XX Divided State Highway
48 Slide 48 Revocation of Commercial Access Recommended Sign Placements Site is downstream of Alternative Access Highway is undivided
49 Slide 49 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is DOWNSTREAM of Alternative Access) SHOPPING CTR SITE XX Undivided State Highway
50 Slide 50 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is DOWNSTREAM of Alternative Access) SHOPPING CTR SITE XX Undivided State Highway
51 Slide 51 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement TO (Site is DOWNSTREAM of Alternative Access) 31 SITE XX Undivided State Highway
52 Slide 52 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is DOWNSTREAM of Alternative Access) SHOPPING CTR SITE XX Undivided State Highway
53 Slide 53 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is DOWNSTREAM of Alternative Access) SHOPPING CTR SITE XX Undivided State Highway
54 Slide 54 Revocation of Commercial Access Recommended Sign Placements Site is downstream of Alternative Access Highway is divided
55 Slide 55 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is DOWNSTREAM of Alternative Access) SHOPPING CTR SITE XX Divided State Highway
56 Slide 56 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement (Site is DOWNSTREAM of Alternative Access) SHOPPING CTR SITE XX Divided State Highway
57 Slide 57 Revocation of Commercial Access Test 5 Recommended Sign Placement TO (Site is DOWNSTREAM of Alternative Access) 31 SITE XX Divided State Highway
58 Slide 58 Where is Existing Access? Access Ingress Egress Road State highway Non-State highway Intersection Street Jughandle (Forward and Reverse) Interchange
59 Slide 59 Street Intersection Ingress State Highway State Highway Ingress Street Street Ingress
60 Slide 60 Street Intersection Egress State Highway Street State Highway Egress Street Egress
61 Slide 61 Forward Jughandle Ingress State Highway State Highway Ingress Street Street Ingress
62 Slide 62 Forward Jughandle Egress State Highway State Highway Egress Street Street Egress
63 Slide 63 Reverse Jughandle Ingress State Highway Street Ingress Street State Highway Ingress
64 Slide 64 Reverse Jughandle Egress State Highway Egress State Highway Street Egress Street
65 Slide 65 Street Interchange Ingress Street Ingress State Highway Ingress State Highway State Highway Ingress
66 Slide 66 Interchange Egress State Highway Egress State Highway Street Street Egress State Highway Egress
67 Slide 67 Modifications
68 Slide 68 Modification of Access 1. Changing the NUMBER of access points 2. Changing the WIDTH of an access point by MORE than 5 feet (1.5 meters) 3. Changing the LOCATION of an access point by MORE than 10 feet (3 meters)
69 Slide 69 Modification of Access Example 1: Changing number of driveways Number of Driveways (X) +/- X Before After
70 Slide 70 Modification of Access Example 2: Changing width by more than 5 feet Before After
71 Slide 71 Modification of Access Example 3: Changing location by more than 10 feet Before After
72 Slide 72 Adjustments
73 Slide 73 Adjustment of Access 1. Changing WIDTH of an access point by 5 feet (1.5 meters) or LESS 2. Changing the LOCATION of an access point by 10 feet (3 meters) or LESS 3. Moving an access point away from the centerline of the highway
74 Slide 74 Adjustment of Access Example 1: Changing width by 5 feet or Less Before After
75 Slide 75 Adjustment of Access Example 2: Changing location by 10 feet or Less Before After
76 Slide 76 Adjustment of Access Example 3: Moving away from the Centerline Before After
77 Slide 77 COMMON DRIVEWAY PROBLEMS
78 Slide 78 What are the most common problems? Too many existing driveways Driveways too close to intersections Owner has invaded the right of way Owner wants betterments
79 Slide 79 What are the most common problems? Too many existing driveways Refer to Modification of Access
80 Slide 80 What are the most common problems? Driveways too close to intersections Street 100 at traffic signals 50 at most unsignalized 12 for most residential Driveway See N.J.A.C. 16:47-3.8(k) State Highway
81 Slide 81 What are the most common problems? Owner has invaded the right of way
82 Slide 82 Reclaiming ROW Bldg ROW Before
83 Slide 83 Reclaiming ROW Bldg X X X X X X X X ROW After
84 Slide 84 Reclaiming ROW Bldg ROW Before
85 Slide 85 Reclaiming ROW Bldg ROW After
86 Slide 86 What are the most common problems? Owner wants betterments One driveway before - Two driveways after Ingress only before - Ingress and egress after
87 Slide 87 Being Customer Friendly
88 Slide 88 CUSTOMER FRIENDLY (effective 1/6/00, Commissioner merged OAD into MAP with a goal of improving the organizational structure with a focus on being customer friendly) In order to be customer friendly and meet context sensitive design goals OAD staff attempts to balance requirements of the Access Code & the Roadway Design Manual against the objectives of the project.
89 Slide 89 New Designs Example of a context sensitive design element without a corresponding NJ Access Code requirement.
90 Slide 90 Roundabouts and Access Management Bruce W. Robinson Principal Investigator Roundabouts: An Informational Guide Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon USA
91 Slide 91 Access Management What to do with driveways? Three typical cases Driveways entering roundabout Driveways near roundabout Mid-block driveways between roundabouts
92 Slide 92 Access Management What to do with driveways? Three typical cases Driveways entering roundabout Driveways near roundabout Mid-block driveways between roundabouts
93 Slide 93 Driveways Entering Roundabout Generally should be avoided High-volume driveways should be designed as a regular approach
94 Slide 94 Driveways Near Roundabout In general, same principles as for driveways near signalized intersections * Should not locate driveways between pedestrian crossing and yield line Driveways blocked by splitter island restricted to right-in/right in/right-out * NJ Access Code would = 100 ft from PT
95 Slide 95 Mid-block Driveways Between Roundabouts Ability to provide full access dependent on several factors: Capacity for minor movements Need for and ability to provide left-turn turn storage between splitter island and driveway Can provide U-turns U at roundabouts
96 Slide 96 Designer s Requirements
97 Slide 97 Designer s Requirements Beginning in Feasibility Assessment (FA) and continuing through Final Scope Development (FSD) the designer of record is responsible for an overall project access plan. Additionally, the designer is responsible for reviewing ALL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS to determine if they are in conformance with the access code.
98 Slide 98 Designer s Requirements If the existing driveways are in conformance with the access code, then no changes should be proposed. If the existing driveways are NOT in conformance with the access code, then the design shall evaluate revising the existing driveway based on TWO VIEWPOINTS.
99 Slide 99 Designer s Requirements Viewpoint 1: As DOT s designer what would be required to bring the existing driveway into conformance by adherence to the access code. Viewpoint #2: As the hypothetical property owner s site engineer would the owner be agreeable to solutions identified in viewpoint #1.
100 Slide 100 Designer s Requirements If viewpoint #2, is NOT compatible with viewpoint #1, then the designer should propose a scheme for access that would likely be acceptable to the owner, keeping in mind the objectives of the access code. It will be the designer s responsibility to propose any waivers, including recommendations to OAD. Ultimately, OAD & the PM will decide on a final access solution.
101 Slide 101 Designer s Requirements If viewpoint #1 & viewpoint #2 are reasonably similar, then the solutions from viewpoint #1 should be progressed.
102 Slide 102 Designer s Requirements If the proposed solution will result in a REVOCATION of access, then the designer shall evaluate & document if the alternative access is reasonable or unreasonable. OAD will evaluate the designer s documentation and agree with the findings of reasonableness BEFORE a revocation of access notification letter is sent.
103 Slide 103 Access Cutouts
104 Slide 104 Preparation of Access Cutouts Following the establishment of the project s s geometry the designer will prepare detailed access cutouts that will be used for property owner notification, based on: ROW Lines (Existing & Proposed) Property Lines (Existing & Proposed) Slope Lines (Existing & Proposed) Denial of Access Lines (Existing & Proposed) Traffic Striping (Existing & Proposed) Driveways(Existing & Proposed with limits of paving) Drainage & Sign Structures (Existing & Proposed) Guiderail (Existing & Proposed) Block #, Lot #, Zoning & Existing Land Use Existing Topography Existing On-Site Parking, circulation & Loading Areas
105 Slide 105 Cutout Content Requirements Size (sufficient to show entire property) Owner s s Name & Address Legend: Scale of Plan Title Block Proposed ROW Line Block No Abbreviations Alternative access route & signing plan (revs only) Existing Driveway (RED) Existing Driveway To Be Removed (Purple) Proposed Driveway (Blue) Topsoil and Seeded Area (Green) Date of Plan (mm/dd/yy) 12 Copies (minimum)
106 Slide 106 Sample Cutout
107 Slide 107 Preparation of Access Cutouts Consultant Prepare markups on the base plan Submit markups to OAD for review Prepare individual cutouts (Revocations, Modifications, Adjustments, Changes showing entire property Revs require a plan showing alternative access route and signing plan Office of Access Design Review submitted markups Arrange meeting with Project Manager and Consultant to discuss alternatives for lots with unique or difficult access Review submitted cutouts for conformity with Access Code and content requirements
108 Slide 108 Sufficiency of Access
109 Slide 109 Design Vehicles Passenger cars Single unit trucks (UPS, Fedex, etc.) Fuel delivery vehicles - WB 15 (Gas Stations) Tractor trailers WB 15 WB 19
110 Slide 110 Things to Consider Identify the vehicles that use the site Establish the before travel paths Getting to an from the site Circulating on the site Establish the after travel paths Analyze getting to and from the site Analyze circulating on the site
111 Slide 111 Sufficiency of Driveway Design Date of road traffic volumes = Date of initial access notice Site trip generation = ITE rates for size and type of land use Site trip distribution = Based on traffic counts or assumptions Hours to analyze = PM and Saturday for shopping, AM and PM for most other land uses Driveway LOS standard = A-E>> 45 seconds Urban, 30 seconds Rural F>>no worse than no-build A% B% A+B% C% Site Site D% C+D% Before After
112 Slide 112 Sufficiency of Design Traffic Engineering Issues (Revocations) Ability of alternative access roadways to handle traffic Ability of alternative access driveways to handle traffic
113 Slide 113 Sufficiency of Design Analysis Before Submitting Revocation Plan Project traffic conditions to date of revocation notice Traffic for existing roads DOT may have counts Designer may have counts Site traffic Use ITE trip generation rates; or Use trip generation from Appendix E1
114 Slide 114 Sufficiency of Design Analysis Before Submitting Revocation Plan Traffic counts may be needed to establish distribution for sites with multiple driveways Use Highway Capacity Manual analyses for Signalized and unsignalized intersections Merges and diverges, etc. Present results in tables
115 Slide 115 Access Appeal Process
116 Slide 116 Appeal Process Department Notification of Access Impacts Adjustments (appeal process NOT required) Department may offer an unofficial appeal opportunity same as a modification Modifications (appeal process required) informal hearing with Manager, informal hearing with Director, Design Services Revocations (appeal process required) informal hearing with Manager formal hearing with Administrative Law Judge
117 Slide 117 Timeframes Modification Appeal Process STEP DAYS Owner requests informal meeting with Manager MAP 30 Informal meeting scheduled 5 Informal meeting held 30 Manager MAP responds to owner 30 Owner accepts or appeals decision to Director Design Services 40 Director schedules hearing 5 Director holds hearing 30 Director makes Final Agency Determination 30 Total 200
118 Slide 118 Timeframes Revocation Appeal Process STEP DAYS Owner requests informal meeting with Manager MAP 30 Informal meeting scheduled 5 Informal meeting held 30 Manager MAP responds to owner 30 Owner accepts or appeals decision to OAL 40 Manager Major Access Permits requests OAL hearing 15 OAL holds hearing 120 OAL Judge makes recommendation to Commissioner 75 Commissioner makes Final Agency Determination 45 Total 390
119 Slide 119 Does Being Customer Friendly Work? Since January 6, 2000: Less than 10 modifications have been appealed to Director of Design Services. TWO revocations of access have been appealed to OAL. Access appeal process has become participatory by including ROW, PM s s & designers. Access decisions based on Departmental teamwork. Savings to project schedules & costs. Allows access to be concluded faster which allows ROW process to begin sooner.
120 Slide 120 We ve carefully thought out all the access We ve used the access code a thousand times. The access process comes naturally to us. We know what we re doing, its what we ve been trained to do. Nothing could possibly go wrong, RIGHT?
121 Slide 121 Think Again - always expect the unexpected!
122 Slide 122 Questions & Answers
123 Slide 123 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 1 How many Departmental Access Classifications are defined in the NJ State Highway Access Management Code? Correct answer is three (3), an adjustment, modification or revocation.
124 Slide 124 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 2 After receipt of a notification letter, how many days does a property owner have to appeal the Department s proposed access? Correct answer is thirty 30 days. Officially, only modifications and revocations can be appealed. For adjustments, notification letters will not be sent to a property owner if ROW is being acquired. If ROW is not being acquired, then the department will notify a property owner of the access impacts as a courtesy and if requested a meeting may be held.
125 Slide 125 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 3 Which type of access impacts require the Department to offer an appeal process? [ ] Adjustments and Modifications [ ] Modifications and Revocations [ ] Adjustments, Modifications and Revocations [ ] Revocations Correct answer is modifications and revocations only. There is no requirement to offer or to hold a meeting for an adjustment.
126 Slide 126 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 4 Which type of access impacts can be appealed to a non- NJDOT agency? [ ] Adjustments and Modifications [ ] Modifications and Revocations [ ] Adjustments, Modifications and Revocations [ ] Revocations Correct answer a revocation: the department shall provide the lot owner with written notice of the owner s right to request a hearing in accordance with the provisions of the administrative procedure act, N.J.S.A. 52:14b-1 et seq., And the uniform administrative procedure rules, N.J.A.C. 1:1. An appeal to the office of administrative law, follows the property owners appeal to the department.
127 Slide 127 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 5 A revocation of access is limited to the elimination of: [ ] Direct Egress [ ] Direct Ingress [ ] Direct Egress and Ingress [ ] All the above Correct answer is ALL THE ABOVE: A revocation of access is restricted to eliminating direct ingress, egress, or ingress and egress and providing access to a street, highway, easement, service road or common driveway other than the subject State highway.
128 Slide 128 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 6 For a revocation of access, how many types of actual lot zoning and actual land usage is considered for determining reasonable alternative access? Correct answer is three (3) commercial, industrial, residential or agricultural. For a lot that is used for purposes more intense than it is zoned for, the existing use shall be used to classify which revocation standards apply. Prior to revocation, the department shall determine that the lot has reasonable access to the general system of streets and highways in the state, other than its state highway access, and that: (continued)
129 Slide 129 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 6 For a lot zoned or used for commercial purposes, has access onto any parallel or perpendicular street, highway, easement, service road, or common driveway, which is of sufficient design to support commercial traffic to the site, and is situated so that motorists will have a convenient, direct, and well-marked means of reaching the site and returning to the state highway. Commercial purposes include, but are not limited to, wholesale facilities, retail facilities, service establishments, office buildings, research buildings, and residential parcels of at least 25 acres and at least four residential units per acre; (continued)
130 Slide 130 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 6 For a lot zoned or used for industrial purposes, has access onto any improved public street, highway, access road, or easement across an industrial access road, which is of sufficient design to support necessary truck and employee access as required by the industry; and 3. For a lot zoned or used for residential or agricultural purposes (except as provided in i. Above), has access onto any improved public street or highway.
131 Slide 131 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 7 How many TESTS must be evaluated in determining if reasonable alternative access has been met, as defined by the Access Code? Correct answer is: depends on the zoning Commercial property = five tests Industrial property = one test Residential = one test Agricultural = one test
132 Slide 132 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 8 A MODIFICATION of access is limited to changing the: a. number of access points b. width of an access point by more than 5 feet c. grade of the access point by more than 5 percent d. location of the access point by more than 10 feet CORRECT ANSWER IS a-b-d. A modification of access is restricted to changing the number of access points, changing the width of an access point by more than five feet (1.5 meters), or changing the location of an access point by more than 10 feet (3 meters).
133 Slide 133 ACCESS TEST QUESTION 9 An ADJUSTMENT of access is limited to changing the: a. number of access points b. width of an access point by 5 feet or less c. moving the access point away from the centerline d. location of the access point by 10 feet or less CORRECT ANSWER IS b-c-d. An adjustment of access is restricted to changing the width of an access point by five feet (1.5 meters) or less, changing the location of an access point by 10 feet (3 meters) or less, moving an access point away from the centerline of the highway, such as when the highway is widened, or changing the elevation or profile of an access point.
134 Slide 134 THE END The Office of Access Design hopes that this training was helpful.
SECTION VII TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
SECTION VII TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES A. GENERAL Traffic Impact Analyses (TIAs) are tools that have historically been utilized to evaluate the interaction between existing transportation infrastructures
More informationBCEO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES
BCEO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES February 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..... i TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY STRUCTURE... 1 WHEN IS A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY NEEDED?..... 1 STUDY AREA, SITE PLAN & HORIZON
More informationAPPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies
APPENDIX B Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies Revised December 7, 2010 via Resolution # 100991 Reformatted March 18, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationGUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES
GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES Adopted by Town Council on November 25, 2008 Prepared By: HNTB Engineering Department Planning Department TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II.
More informationAuthority: N.J.S.A. 27:1A-5, 27:1A-6 and 27:7-44.1, and 27:7-89 et seq., specifically 27:7-91. Expires on February 27, 2021.
TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 47. STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS MANAGEMENT CODE Authority: N.J.S.A. 27:1A-5, 27:1A-6 and 27:7-44.1, and 27:7-89 et seq., specifically 27:7-91. Expires on February 27, 2021. SUBCHAPTER
More informationTransportation and Works Department The Regional Municipality of York Yonge Street Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 6Z1
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY (TIS) GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS Transportation and Works Department The Regional Municipality of York 17250 Yonge Street Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 6Z1 August, 2007
More informationTraffic Impact Study Requirements
[TYPE THE COMPANY NAME] Traffic Impact Study Requirements County of San Mateo Department of Public Works Roadway Services 9/1/2013 I. Introduction The County of San Mateo (County), Department of Public
More informationDIVISION I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES ENGINEERING STANDARDS
CITY OF ALBANY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION I TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES ENGINEERING STANDARDS Prepared By PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ALBANY, OREGON 97321 Telephone: (541) 917-7676 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationWELCOME IL 47. Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017
WELCOME IL 47 Community Advisory Group Meeting #5 Waubonsee Community College Wednesday, May 31, 2017 MEETING PURPOSE MEETING AGENDA 1. Welcome/Introduction 2. Review Previous Public Involvement 3. Process/Schedule
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis (TIA) POLICY
Ascension Parish Planning Commission Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) POLICY This policy establishes requirements for studies that provide information on traffic projected to be generated by all proposed
More informationCHAPTER 70 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARTICLE 70 BASIC PROVISIONS
CHAPTER 70 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARTICLE 70 BASIC PROVISIONS 70.010 - PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to establish standards for the design and development of sites in order
More informationPRIVATE ROAD AND DRIVEWAY STANDARDS Development Standard #1 (Rev 7/18)
PRIVATE ROAD AND DRIVEWAY STANDARDS Development Standard #1 (Rev 7/18) I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR DRIVEWAYS AND PRIVATE ROADS A. Fire District access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance
More informationAPPENDIX D ACCESS MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES
APPENDIX D ACCESS MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES Access management has become an important tool in transportation planning. Access management guidelines are intended to preserve the integrity of roadways by balancing
More informationTRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES
TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES December 2013 The scope of the traffic impact analysis (TIA) should follow these guidelines and the requirements of VMC 11.80.130 and VMC 11.70, transportation concurrency (attached
More informationDRAFT. SR-60 7 th Avenue Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) I-605 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) I-605/SR-60 EA# 3101U0
SR-60 7 th Avenue Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) I-605/SR-60 EA# 3101U0 October 9, 2017 Contents 1 Purpose of ICE Memo... 1 2 Background... 1 3 Existing Interchange Deficiencies... 1 4 Context Sensitive
More informationTraffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Town of Queen Creek
Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Town of Queen Creek January 2016 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to outline the procedures and requirements for preparing a Transportation Impact Analysis
More informationCity of Menifee. Public Works Department. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines
Public Works Department Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines Revised: August 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 3 PURPOSE... 3 EXEMPTIONS... 3 SCOPING... 4 METHODOLOGY... 5 STUDY AREA... 6 STUDY SCENARIOS...
More informationCITY OF VALLEJO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT Analysis/Study GUIDELINES
The City Engineer, under the authority of the Public Works Director and recommendations from the Traffic Engineer, will make the final decision on the need for a traffic study. The purpose of the traffic
More informationGeneral Guidelines for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies
ENGINEERING & OPERATIONS DIVISION General Guidelines for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies April 2010 Prepared by: Highway Planning and Design Branch Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. TRAFFIC
More information# 17 ) UN DESERT GREEN FARMS SPECIAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION OF TIME PUBLIC HEARING
# 17 ) UN-101-14 DESERT GREEN FARMS SPECIAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION OF TIME PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Meeting date: December 9, 2015 Item: UN-101-14 Prepared by: Robert Eastman GENERAL
More informationCHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES
CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES 4.0 INTRODUCTION The ability to accommodate high volumes of intersecting traffic safely and efficiently through the arrangement of one or more interconnecting
More informationTraffic Impact Study Guidelines. City of Guelph
Traffic Impact Study Guidelines City of Guelph April 2016 Engineering and Capital Infrastructure Services Infrastructure, Development & Enterprise 1 Carden Street Guelph, Ontario Canada N1H 3A1 Page 1
More informationArticle 16 Traffic Impact Analysis
Article 16 Traffic Impact Analysis Table of Contents... 16-1 Chapter 16.1 Purpose and Intent... 16-2 Chapter 16.2 Applicability... 16-2 Chapter 16.3 Exemptions... 16-2 Chapter 16.4 Trip Generation Data...
More informationALBION FLATS DEVELOPMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS FINAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 2 3.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 3 4.0 POTENTIAL IMPACTS
More informationConclusions & Lessons Learned
What is a DDI Recommended Practices Traffic Operations Analysis Geometric Design FHWA Review Conclusions & Lessons Learned It s not about you, it s about the public Developed by Access Utah County
More informationNovember 8, RE: Harrah s Station Square Casino Transportation Analysis Detailed Traffic Impact Study Review. Dear Mr. Rowe:
November 8, 2006 Mr. Glenn Rowe, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Bureau of Highway Safety and Traffic Engineering Commonwealth Keystone Building 400 North Street, 6 th Floor Harrisburg,
More informationTRANSPORTATION PROJECT REPORT DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002
TRANSPORTATION INTERSTATE 87 INTERCHANGE 11A TOWN OF MALTA SARATOGA COUNTY, NY DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002 PROJECT REPORT NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JOSEPH
More informationProject Prioritization for Urban and Rural Projects TEAM CONFERENCE March 7, 2018
Project Prioritization for Urban and Rural Projects 2018 TEAM CONFERENCE March 7, 2018 Challenge Limited funding for transportation improvements requires strategic selection of projects to ensure resource
More informationCity of Berkeley. Guidelines for Development of Traffic Impact Reports
Office of Transportation (OOT) City of Berkeley Guidelines for Development of Traffic Impact Reports Office of Transportation, City of Berkeley 1 1. Overview These guidelines provide a framework to help
More informationLOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM GENERAL SUBJECT: Design Exceptions / Waivers SPECIFIC SUBJECT: Design Exception Request Form
More informationWork Breakdown Structure Element Dictionary Preliminary Engineering
Element Name Initiation PE 3.1 Initiation includes the implementation of the project s funding and notification of the consultant or in-house design staff to commence work, the Kickoff Meeting with the
More informationLand Use Regulations Update. Robert W. Hofrichter Assistant Administrator, Maintenance Division December 3, 2008
Land Use Regulations Update Robert W. Hofrichter Assistant Administrator, Maintenance Division December 3, 2008 Access Management Principal Arterials 24 VAC 30-72-10 et seq All Other Highways 24 VAC 30-73-10
More informationPARISH OF ASCENSION OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DEPARTMENT
REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL PERMITS 1. Submit a digital Drainage Impact Study per the current Drainage Impact Study Policy as referenced in the Ascension Parish Drainage Ordinance to Jamaica Banker JBanker@apgov.us
More informationVIII. LAND USE ISSUES
VIII. LAND USE ISSUES The & Route 57 Land Use and Circulation Study (Land Use Study, Figure 6) was completed for the Town of Clay in November 1999 (Clough, Harbour & Associates). This study investigated
More informationCITY OF MARIANNA MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 936 Marianna, FL (850)
CITY OF MARIANNA MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 936 Marianna, FL 32447 (850) 482-2786 TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS CITY OF MARIANNA CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CMS) This form
More informationPublic Hearing January 13, Request Conditional Use Permit (Auto Repair Garage) Staff Planner Carolyn A.K. Smith
Applicant Property Owner Holland Century Associates, LLP Public Hearing January 13, 2016 Request Conditional Use Permit (Auto Repair Garage) Staff Planner Carolyn A.K. Smith Location 3949 Holland Road
More informationN.J.A.C. 19: This file includes all Regulations adopted and published through the New Jersey Register, Vol. 50 No. 1, January 2, 2018
N.J.A.C. 19:66-8.1 19:66-8.1 Purpose (a) This subchapter serves the following purposes: 1. To provide for the comprehensive and orderly development of the district in accordance with the Tourism District
More informationProblem Screening Guideline January, 2016
Problem Screening Guideline January, 2016 Check the Capital Project Delivery website to ensure this is the current version Table of Contents Purpose... 1 Introduction... 1 The following are the major work
More informationI-64 Peninsula Shoulder Usage Evaluation. Eric Stringfield VDOT Hampton Roads Transportation Planning April 3, 2013
I-64 Peninsula Shoulder Usage Evaluation Eric Stringfield VDOT Hampton Roads Transportation Planning April 3, 2013 Briefing Purpose Evaluation Area / Existing Conditions Code and Policy Engineering Facts
More informationAPPENDIX A. City of Hudson LWRP and. O&G Truck Route Alternatives- Traffic Analysis
APPENDIX A City of Hudson LWRP and O&G Truck Route Alternatives- Traffic Analysis LWRP Build-Out Traffic Generation Existing Zoning Area Total In Out 1A and 1B Residential 210 & 230 1,555 D.U 1,197 778
More informationROADWAY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
ROADWAY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Adopted: 1990 Amended: 1994 2003 2011 2013 ROADWAY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED IN 1990 Resolution No. R-990-046 OFFICIALLY AMENDED IN
More informationLOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM GENERAL SUBJECT: Interstate, NHS Non-Interstate and Non-NHS (IJR / IMR Guidance) SPECIFIC SUBJECT:
More informationMatanuska- Susitna Borough Subdivision Construction Manual Update, Phase 1 4/6/2018 Summary of Changes
Summary of Changes Throughout document Introduction Index Remove gendered pronouns Standardize language, vocabulary, acronyms Refer to latest edition of referenced publications Tie in subdivision code
More informationDRAFT: SUBJECT TO CHANGE PRIOR TO COMMISSION ACTION
TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ALL Counties MINUTE ORDER Page of ALL Districts The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) finds it necessary to adopt amendments to.0 and.0, relating to major shopping
More informationAPPENDIX C POLK COUNTY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES
APPENDIX C POLK COUNTY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES POLK COUNTY TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, METHODOLOGY AND PROCEDURES A. Purpose B. Intent The purpose of a traffic impact study is to identify
More informationWelcome!! Temporary Traffic Control During Maintenance and Short Duration Activities. Training Course 1-1
Welcome!! Temporary Traffic Control During Maintenance and Short Duration Activities Training Course 1-1 About This Course This material is based upon work supported by the Federal Highway Administration
More informationJobs & Transportation Ramping it Up Roadway and Traffic Dan Groh, P.E.
Jobs & Transportation Ramping it Up Roadway and Traffic Dan Groh, P.E. Ohio DOT Work Zone Process Review Ohio DOT Work Zone Process Review This review was conducted by the Ohio Department of Transportation
More informationUpdated Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations Administrative Guidelines
Updated Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations Administrative Guidelines 24VAC30-155 January 2012 Land Development Section Transportation and Mobility Planning Division Virginia Department of Transportation
More informationSECTION 6. ROAD CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
SECTION 6. ROAD CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Construction of new roads or reconstruction of existing roads proposed for dedication to the County shall conform to the standards set forth in this section. Roads
More informationAppendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance
Appendix D Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance Functional classification identifies the role a highway or street plays in the transportation system. Some highways
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2015
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PLANNING APPROVAL & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2015 NAME SUBDIVISION NAME CC Williams Plant Subdivision CC Williams Plant Subdivision LOCATION CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT
More informationUNIFORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR EXTENDING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SECTION 2 DESIGN STANDARDS
UNIFORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR EXTENDING WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SECTION 2 DESIGN STANDARDS DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION 2 INDEX ITEM DESCRIPTION 2.00 GENERAL STATEMENT 2.01 WATER DISTRIBUTION
More informationTRAFFIC PROGRAM ACCESS MANUAL Edition WYDOT ACCESS MANUAL 0
TRAFFIC PROGRAM ACCESS MANUAL 2014 Edition WYDOT ACCESS MANUAL 0 WYDOT ACCESS MANUAL WYDOT ACCESS MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 ACCESS MANAGEMENT 2 FUNCTIONAL ROAD
More informationSAMPLE INITIAL STRATEGY ANALYSIS SMITHBURG GAS STATION PROJECT Note that actual place names have been fictionalized
SAMPLE INITIAL STRATEGY ANALYSIS SMITHBURG GAS STATION PROJECT Note that actual place names have been fictionalized STRATEGY RECOMMENDATIONS The gas station project will be heard by the City of Smithburg
More informationReview Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision
Review Zone Application for D&R Canal Commission Decision MEETING DATE: January 18, 2017 DRCC #: 16-3020C Latest Submission Received: January 10, 2016 Applicant: PVP Franklin, LLC 769 Northfield Avenue,
More informationCITY OF CLOVIS Traffic Impact Study Guidelines
CITY OF CLOVIS Traffic Impact Study Guidelines CLOVIS, A WAY OF LIFE Approved August 25, 2014 City Council Resolution 2014-79 Prepared by City of Clovis Engineering Division Steve White, City Engineer
More informationTOWN OF BARGERSVILLE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES
TOWN OF BARGERSVILLE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDY GUIDELINES Town of Bargersville Department of Development 24 North Main Street, P.O. Box 420 Bargersville, Indiana 46106 Adopted by the Bargersville
More informationAppendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance
APPENDICES Appendix D: Functional Classification Criteria and Characteristics, and MnDOT Access Guidance D.1 Functional classification identifies the role a highway or street plays in the transportation
More informationCHAPTER 2: MODELING METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER 2: MODELING METHODOLOGY 2.1 PROCESS OVERVIEW The methodology used to forecast future conditions consisted of traditional traffic engineering practices and tools with enhancements to more accurately
More informationThe TIS is to be signed and sealed by a Florida Registered Professional Engineer.
CHAPTER 900. SECTION 901. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS 901.5. Transportation Impact Study A. Intent and Purpose The intent and purpose of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is to identify
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS...
Amendment No. 2 to Reclamation Plan 2006-01 Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... I APPENDICES... III LIST OF EXHIBITS... V LIST OF TABLES... VII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS... IX
More informationCE 452 Traffic Impact Assessment
CE 452 Traffic Impact Assessment 1 Why Required? New developments Produce/ attract new traffic Production: Residences Attraction: Shops, Offices, Schools, Hospitals etc. etc. Changes in traffic pattern
More informationVDOT Land Use Overview. Brad Shelton, AICP Transportation and Mobility Planning Division June 2015
VDOT Land Use Overview Brad Shelton, AICP Transportation and Mobility Planning Division June 2015 VDOT Land Development Programs Local/State Plan and Program Consistency Review local comp plan transportation
More informationBOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
PLANNING ORGANIZATIO BOSTON REGION MPO NMETROPOLITAN BOSTON REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Stephanie Pollack, MassDOT Secretary and CEO and MPO Chair Karl H. Quackenbush, Executive Director,
More informationHALDIMAND COUNTY DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION T TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES
HALDIMAND COUNTY DESIGN CRITERIA SECTION T TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES Revised 2015 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES PAGE 1 T 1.00 T 1.01 INTRODUCTION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY One of Haldimand County s key objectives
More informationRESOLUTION NO
RESOLUTION NO. 2017- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; ESTABLISHING A UNIFORM METHODOLOGY FOR MULTIMODAL MOBILITY ANALYSES ; AND
More information5 April 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: NCC DEVELOPMENT, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: FULTON BANK
5 April 11, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: NCC DEVELOPMENT, LLC PROPERTY OWNER: FULTON BANK STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit Car Wash/Auto Repair ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 1525
More informationMendocino Forest Products Grading For Industrial Land Improvements
Mendocino Forest Products Grading For Industrial Land Improvements Technical Memorandum #10 CEQA Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Prepared for: Mendocino Forest Products Company, LLC Consulting Engineers
More informationChapter 4. Drainage Report and Construction Drawing Submittal Requirements
4.0 Introduction The requirements presented in this section shall be used to aid the design engineer or applicant in the preparation of drainage reports, drainage studies, and construction drawings for
More informationROAD CUT PERMIT APPLICATION & INSTRUCTIONS
Jeremy Robinson Commissioner Ann Fordock Martin E. Davis, L.S. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Ben Walsh, Mayor ROAD CUT PERMIT APPLICATION & INSTRUCTIONS REQUIRED FOR: Construction in (cutting into) a city
More informationMULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES
MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES 1 st Edition City of San Luis Obispo 2035 Circulation Element 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Process... 2 When Impact Studies Are Required... 3
More informationThe Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges
The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges I. ABSTRACT Keith A. Riniker, PE, PTOE This paper presents the Folded Interchange design and compares
More information2.0 ACCESS OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIES
2.0 ACCESS OBJECTIVES, PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIES Early in the development of the Access Control Plan update project, it was important for the project team to develop initial objectives of what access management
More informationSection 1 OBC FADS /13 Access to Parking Areas
Section 1 OBC 3.8.2.2 4.3.12/13 Access to Parking Areas A barrier-free path of travel is provided from: a) the entrance to the exterior parking area b) at least one parking level where a passenger elevator
More informationKansas NG911 Addressing Guidelines
Kansas NG911 Addressing Guidelines Version 1.0 Prepared by the GIS Committee on behalf of the Kansas 911 Coordinating Council Document Change Log Date Author Change Reason 25 Jan 18 GIS Committee Initial
More informationDouglas Woods Wind Farm
Traffic Evaluation and Access Management Report Douglas Woods Wind Farm Douglas,Massachusets Prepared for American Pro Wind 195 Libbey Parkway - Unit Two Weymouth, MA 02189 Prepared by Transportation,
More informationInclude this form in your application submittal.
PRE-APPLICATION FORM PLEASE NOTE: A pre-application conference is required prior to submittal on all applications. The purpose of the pre-application conference is to determine if the application is ready
More information#4) UN NUVEDA - CULTIVATION SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING
#4) UN-60-16 NUVEDA - CULTIVATION SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Meeting date: September 14, 2016 Item: UN-60-16 Prepared by: Robert Eastman GENERAL INFORMATION:
More informationTxDOT Houston District Permit Requirements (Information contained herein is subject to change)
Houston District Permit Requirements (Information contained herein is subject to change) Access Driveway for Commercial / Industrial Developments; or Street Tie-In / Drainage-Only 1) Complete the three
More informationTRB WEBINAR PROGRAM Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual: Contents
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB WEBINAR PROGRAM Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual: Contents Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:00-3:30 PM ET The Transportation
More informationSTAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: December 14, 2016 Item: UN Prepared by: Robert Eastman. To allow a vehicle impound yard
# 6 ) UN-79-16 ABC TOWING, TITAN TOWING, AND TOW GUY TOWING SPECIAL USE PERMIT PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Meeting date: December 14, 2016 Item: UN-79-16 Prepared by: Robert Eastman
More informationMONTEZUMA COUNTY COLORADO ROAD AND BRIDGE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
MONTEZUMA COUNTY COLORADO ROAD AND BRIDGE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS The following Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction in Montezuma County, Colorado have been amended this 22 nd, day
More informationTOWN OF MOORESVILLE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL TOWN OF MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
TOWN OF MOORESVILLE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL TOWN OF MOORESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA Effective August 1, 2007 Amended March 4, 2013, December 1, 2014, May 1, 2017 TOWN OF MOORESVILLE,
More informationWoodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report
Final Report Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report Prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation April 212 Prepared by DKS Associates Contents Methodologies... 4 Volume Development...
More informationPage 1D-1 Revised language to link from Project Management Manual to Project Management Online Guide.
IMPERIAL ROAD DESIGN MANUAL REVISIONS July 2008 CHAPTER 1D Page 1D-1 Revised language to link from Project Management Manual to Project Management Online Guide. CHAPTER 2A Page 2A-3 Revised language to
More informationNCHRP 3-88 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing
Session 312 Updates on NCHRP-Funded Geometric Design Research Projects NCHRP 3-88 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing Brian L. Ray, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc Portland, Oregon bray@ kittelson.com
More informationEnterprise Parkway Improvement Project, CIP# E364
Exhibit A SCOPE OF SERVICES AND FEES This project, in general, consists of: Construction of roadway improvements to extend Enterprise Parkway east of Superior Industries and Lockheed Martin to connect
More informationPERMITTED USES: Within the MX Mixed Use District the following uses are permitted:
6.24 - MX - MIXED USE DISTRICT 6.24.1 INTENT: The purpose of the MX Mixed Use District is to accommodate the development of a wide-range of residential and compatible non-residential uses (including major
More informationCAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS. Planning Department
CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT PLANNING SERVICE STANDARDS AND PROCESS Planning Department January 2016 INTRODUCTION Transit Service Standards are public rules and guidelines used to make decisions about where transit
More informationEvaluating Design Alternatives using Crash Prediction Methods from the Highway Safety Manual
Evaluating Design Alternatives using Crash Prediction Methods from the Highway Safety Manual Andrew Ooms November 2012 Outline Safety Overview Current practices Safety Fundamentals Introduction the Highway
More information500 Interchange Design
500 Interchange Design Table of Contents 501 Interchange Design... 5-1 July 2015 501.1 General... 5-1 501.2 Interchange Type... 5-1 501.2.1 General... 5-1 502 Interchange Design Considerations... 5-2 502.1
More informationZoning Permits 11-1 ZONING PERMITS
Zoning Permits 11-1 ZONING PERMITS (a) Building or structures shall be started, repaired, reconstructed, enlarged or altered only after a zoning permit has been obtained from the administrator and a building
More informationAccess Operations Study: Analysis of Traffic Signal Spacing on Four Lane Arterials
Mn/DOT Access Management Guidelines Background Technical Report Access Operations Study: Analysis of Traffic Signal Spacing on Four Lane Arterials November 2002 Minnesota Department of Transportation Office
More informationAPPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS
APPENDIX H: TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS Travel demand models (TDM) simulate current travel conditions and forecast future travel patterns and conditions based on planned system improvements
More informationMEDIAN OPENINGS AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT
Approved: Effective: February 20, 2013 Office: Systems Planning Topic No.: 625-010-021-h Department of Transportation PURPOSE: MEDIAN OPENINGS AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT This procedure provides direction on
More informationCITY OF LETHBRIDGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES
CITY OF LETHBRIDGE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GUIDELINES March 2008 0526 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Traffic Impact Study 1 1.2 Need and Justification 2 1.3 Purpose of Guidelines
More informationCHAPTER 2B - PHASE I, INITIAL ROADWAY INVESTIGATION & PRELIMINARY FIELD INSPECTION
CHAPTER 2B - PHASE I, INITIAL ROADWAY INVESTIGATION & PRELIMINARY FIELD INSPECTION SECTION 2B 1 - GROUND SURVEYS Survey Authorization... 2B-1 Interstate... 2B-1 Principal / Minor Arterial... 2B-1 Urban...
More informationSECTION TRAFFIC REGULATIONS
PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 DESCRIPTION A. Traffic Control permits, notifications, mobilization, temporary signs, barriers, lights, flagging personnel, striping, markings, and demobilization and removal. 1.2 RELATED
More informationNCHRP Report 687 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing
Updates on NCHRP-Funded Geometric Design Research Projects NCHRP Report 687 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing Brian L. Ray, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc Portland, Oregon bray@ kittelson.com
More informationMesa County. Road Access Policy
Mesa County Road Access Policy School Business House or parcel This Policy supersedes all road access related materials within the Mesa County Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and
More information