Appendix B Highway 407 Interchange Review - Cochrane Street Area
|
|
- John Wilson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appendix B Highway 407 Interchange Review - Cochrane Street Area
2
3 AECOM 300 ater Street hitby, ON, Canada L1N 9J2 Memorandum To Michael May, P.Eng., Town of hitby Page 1 CC Subject Greg Hardy, P.Eng., Town of hitby From Brenda Jamieson, P.Eng. / Heather Nottbeck, P.Eng. Date May 24, 2016 Project Number Introduction AECOM was retained by the Town of hitby to undertake conceptual design for potential interchange configurations at Highway 407 and Cochrane Street and Highway 407 and Ashburn Road in the Town of hitby. The approved Highway 407 East plan documented in the 407 East Report includes the following key elements: Construction of the Highway 407 Mainline from Brock Road to Highway 35/115; Construction of two north-south links Highway 412 and Highway 418 that will connect Highway 407 to Highway 401; and Protection for a dedicated transit way and support facilities. The first phase of work (see Exhibit 1) includes a six lane east-west freeway from Brock Road to Highway 412, a four lane east-west freeway from Highway 412 to Harmony Road and a four lane northsouth freeway from Highway 401 to Highway 407. Four arterial road interchanges are planned in the Brooklin area, specifically full interchanges at Lake Ridge Road, Baldwin Street (Hwy 7/12), and Thickson Road, and a partial interchange (to and from the south) on Highway 412 at Highway 7. A full interchange accommodates moves in all directions while a partial interchange only accommodate moves to and from the corridor in one direction. Though not shown in Exhibit 1, the 407 East Report stated: A future interchange at Cochrane Street is not precluded and would be subject to approval of an independent and review and approval by MTO. A conceptual plan of the Town of hitby s proposed interchange at Cochrane Street was included in the Report and is illustrated in Exhibit 2. Cochrane Street is situated approximately 2 km east of Highway 412 and 2 km west of Baldwin Street. Ashburn Road is situated approximately 3 km east of Highway 412 and 1 km west of Baldwin Street. Highway 7 crosses over the Highway 407 corridor midway between Cochrane Street and Ashburn Road. MEMO Highway 407 Interchange Review.Docx
4 Page 2 Memorandum, May 24, 2016 Exhibit 1: Highway 407 East Phase 1 Exhibit 2: Conceptual 407 East / Cochrane Street Interchange Design in 407 East Report
5 Page 3 Memorandum, May 24, 2016 This memorandum provides a brief overview of the key design principles and guidelines that were considered in the development of the conceptual design alternatives for the Cochrane Street and Ashburn Road interchange locations and the identification of key advantages and disadvantages for each alternative design from a design, transportation operations and land use perspective. This memorandum also identifies additional work which is expected to be required by the Ministry of Transportation for their review and approval of an additional interchange on the Highway 407 Mainline between Highway 412 and Baldwin Street. 2. Design Principles and Guidelines The applicable design principles and guidelines for interchange locations and configurations are set out in the Geometric Design Standards Manual for Ontario Highways (GDSOH) and the Highway Access Management Guidelines. 2.1 SYSTEM CONSIDERATIONS An interchange is one element of a freeway system. Freeway design elements and interchange design influence the operation of each other and as such it is essential to treat a length of freeway and its associated interchanges as a single system to ensure proper balance of features and consistent operational quality and performance. Key system considerations include: Interchange location and spacing: Interchanges should be located at major arterial roads in proximity to major development areas. Interchange spacing in urban areas generally ranges from 2 km to 3 km. Coordination of interchanges: Consistency of interchange features in urban areas promotes driver understanding and smooth flowing operation. Right side exits in advance of underpass structures are preferable from a driver expectation and safety perspective. Lane balance and basic lanes: Proper lane balance and maintenance of basic lanes promotes safe operations and accommodates variations in traffic patterns. eaving: hen a freeway entrance is followed by an exit, traffic entering the freeway and that exiting the freeway cross and are in conflict. The conflict between entering and exiting traffic tends to interrupt the operation of through traffic, creates turbulence in the traffic flow and has the effect of reducing capacity and safety performance. This length of roadway is referred to as a weaving section. The weaving length is measured from a point where the adjacent edges of pavement at the merge (on-ramp) are 0.5 m apart to a point where the adjacent edges of pavement at the diverge (off-ramp) are 3.75 m apart as described in Section F.4.5 of the GDSOH. In accordance with the GDSOH, to maintain safe efficient operation between entrance and exit ramps, minimum weaving lengths of 600 m and 800 m should be provided between arterial interchanges and an arterial interchange and a freeway interchange respectively. Shorter weaving lengths may be imposed due to other constraints and will operate with varying qualities of service depending on local conditions such as traffic volumes, sight distance and alignment features. Arterial road interchange locations are typically sited based on the following factors: Interchange spacing guidelines set out in the GDSOH: minimum 2 km spacing between arterial road interchanges through urban areas, providing for a minimum weaving length of 600m;
6 Page 4 Memorandum, May 24, 2016 minimum 3 km spacing between an arterial road interchange and a freeway to freeway interchange, providing for a minimum weavingg length of 800m; Connections to major arterial roadways is preferable; Existing and planned development in proximity to the interchange location; and Traffic forecasting work. As noted previously, shorter weaving lengths and hence a tighter interchange spacing may be accepted by the Ministry if the traffic operations analysis demonstrates acceptable traffic operations can be achieved. 2.2 INTERCHANGEE DESIGN The selection and design of an interchange is influenced by site specific engineering, environmental, topographical and operational considerations. The preferred interchange configuration is the Parclo A4 design as it has the best capacity, operational and safety characteristics relative to other available interchange configurations as shown in Exhibit 3. here significant environmental, geometric or property constraints, alternativee interchange configurations can be considered. Exhibit 3: Comparison of Interchange Configuration Characteristics Interchange Configuration Parclo A4 Parclo A2 Parclo B2 Parclo AB Diamond (1) Characteristic / Selection Consideration Capacity Highest /High /High Delay on Cross Road Low Low Low /High Traffic Progression on Cross Road Best Pedestrian and Bicycle Accommodation on Cross Easy Difficult Difficult Difficult Easy Road Relative Construction Cost High Low Right-of-ay High /High /High /High /Low Note: (1) Partial diamond is a variation of the diamond interchange configuration.
7 Page 5 Memorandum, May 24, 2016 Ramp geometry, including the alignment, profile and cross section, is influenced by a number of design considerations such as traffic volume and traffic mix, geometric and operational characteristics of the crossing road and adjacent through roads, interchange configuration, terrain, traffic control devices and driver expectation. The geometric requirements for interchange ramps are set out in the GDSOH, including applicable design speeds for ramp elements and entrance / exit terminal designs to and from the freeway and the crossing road to satisfy operational and safety performance requirements. The spacing between ramp terminal intersections along the crossing road and adjacent intersections is also an important design consideration with respect to the performance and operation of the ramp terminal intersections. A minimum spacing of 300 m is desirable in accordance with the Highway Access Management Guidelines. A tighter spacing may be accepted by the Ministry if the traffic operations analysis demonstrates acceptable traffic operations can be achieved. 3. Conceptual Design Alternatives Conceptual interchange design alternatives were generated for the Cochrane Street and Ashburn Road locations in accordance with the design principles and guidelines set out in Section 2 utilizing the Highway 407 East issued for construction drawings and base mapping provided by the Town of hitby. 3.1 COCHRANE STREET INTERCHANGE DESIGN ALTERNATIS Given existing site conditions and the design principles and guidelines set out in Section 2, three alternatives were developed for the Cochrane Street/Highway 407 Interchange as follows and shown in Appendix A: Alternative 1 consisting of a Parclo A2 configuration on the north side of Highway 407 (i.e. for the westerly oriented ramps) and a Diamond configuration on the south side of Highway 407 (i.e. for the easterly oriented ramps) which protects for a future eastbound inner loop ramp. This alternative exceeds the minimum weaving distance of 800 m to the Highway 412 interchange ramps and 600 m to the Baldwin Street interchange ramps and provides a separation of 201 m between the south ramp terminal intersection and the Cochrane Street / Highway 7 intersection which is less than the desired minimum spacing of 300 m. Alternative 2 consisting of a Parclo A2 configuration on the north side of Highway 407 (i.e. for the westerly oriented ramps) and a tightened Diamond configuration on the south side of Highway 407 (i.e. for the easterly oriented ramps) which does not protect for a future eastbound inner loop ramp. This alternative exceeds the minimum weaving distance of 800 m to the Highway 412 interchange ramps and 600 m to the Baldwin Street interchange ramps and provides a separation of 215 m between the south ramp terminal intersection and the Cochrane Street / Highway 7 intersection which is less than the desired minimum spacing of 300 m. Alternative 3 consisting of a Parclo A4 configuration on both the north side and the south side of Highway 407. However, due to the proximity of the Highway 412 freeway ramps to the west, the available weaving distance in the westbound direction between the Cochrane Street southbound on-ramp and the westbound exit ramp to Highway 412 southbound would be in the order of 435 m which is well short of the minimum required distance of 800 m. This alternative exceeds the minimum weaving distances to the other adjacent interchange ramps and provides a separation of 201 m between the south ramp terminal intersection and the Cochrane Street / Highway 7 intersection.
8 Page 6 Memorandum, May 24, 2016 Consideration was also given to providing a Parclo B interchange configuration on the south side of Highway 407 for the easterly oriented ramps. However, this configuration would result in a spacing of less than 150 m between the south ramp terminal intersection and the Highway 7/Cochrane Street intersection which was not considered feasible. Furthermore, a Parclo B interchange configuration does not offer the same operational and safety performance as the proposed diamond configuration. The potential for modifications to the Highway 412 interchange easterly oriented ramps was also considered to increase the separation distance to the Cochrane Street interchange. However, given the complexity of the Highway 412 interchange, minor refinements to the easterly oriented ramps are not feasible to increase the separation distance. Key advantages and disadvantages of the Cochrane Street interchange design alternatives are identified in Exhibit 4. Exhibit 4: Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Cochrane Street Interchange Design Alternatives Alternative Advantages Disadvantages Cochrane Street Alt 1 (Recommended for Future Review) Cochrane Street Alt 2 (Recommended for Future Review) Achieves minimum spacing to Baldwin Street interchange (2 km) Standard interchange configuration and geometry; protects for future eastbound inner loop ramp Accommodates all moves Exceeds minimum weaving lengths (1) Parallel lane exit provided on Cochrane Street to westbound onramp which should result in improved traffic operations on Cochrane Street Achieves minimum spacing to Baldwin Street interchange (2 km) Standard interchange configuration and geometry Accommodates all moves Exceeds minimum weaving lengths (1) Direct taper exit provided on Cochrane Street to westbound onramp which should result in acceptable traffic operations on Cochrane Street Spacing of 2 km to Hwy 412 interchange is less than typical minimum requirement of 3 km Provides intersection spacing of 201 m on Cochrane Street between south ramp terminal intersection and Hwy 7 intersection vs desired minimum of 300m Approach grades on Cochrane Street in vicinity of Hwy 407 crossing are approx. 6%; profile adjustments will be required to achieve maximum 3% grade required for ramp terminal intersections Requires widening of watercourse structures east and west of Cochrane Street (M37 and M39) Moderate footprint requirement relative to other alternatives (approx. 12 ha) Moderate cost relative to other alternatives Spacing of 2 km to Hwy 412 interchange is less than typical minimum requirement of 3 km Precludes addition of eastbound inner loop ramp Provides intersection spacing of 215 m on Cochrane Street between south ramp terminal intersection and Hwy 7 intersection vs desired minimum of 300m Approach grades on Cochrane Street in vicinity of Hwy 407 crossing are approx. 6%; profile adjustments will be required to achieve maximum 3% grade required
9 Page 7 Memorandum, May 24, 2016 Alternative Advantages Disadvantages for ramp terminal intersections Requires widening of watercourse structures east and west of Cochrane Street (M37 and M39) Moderate footprint requirement relative to other alternatives (approx. 12 ha) Lowest cost relative to other alternatives Cochrane Street Alt 3 (Not Recommended for Future Review) Achieves minimum spacing to Baldwin Street interchange (2 km) Standard interchange configuration and geometry Accommodates all moves Exceeds minimum weaving lengths to Baldwin Street ramps and the Hwy 412 EB on-ramp (1) Direct taper exit provided on Cochrane Street to westbound onramp which should result in acceptable traffic operations on Cochrane Street Spacing of 2 km to Hwy 412 interchange is less than typical minimum requirement of 3 km Does not achieve minimum weaving length to the Hwy 412 B off-ramp (435 m vs 800 m) Provides intersection spacing of 201 m on Cochrane Street between south ramp terminal intersection and Hwy 7 intersection vs desired minimum of 300m Approach grades on Cochrane Street in vicinity of Hwy 407 crossing are approx. 6%; profile adjustments will be required to achieve maximum 3% grade required for ramp terminal intersections Requires widening of watercourse structures east and west of Cochrane Street (M37 and M39) Largest footprint requirement relative to other alternatives (approx. 14 ha) Highest cost relative to other alternatives Notes: 1. Traffic analysis required to confirm operational performance of weaving sections acceptable. 3.2 ASHBURN ROAD INTERCHANGE DESIGN ALTERNATIS Given existing site conditions and the design principles and guidelines set out in Section 2, one alternative was developed for the Ashburn Road/Highway 407 Interchange as follows and shown in Appendix A: Alternative 1 consisting of a Partial Diamond configuration accommodating movements to and from the west. The entrance to Highway 407 westbound is via a direct on-ramp from Highway 7 westbound, just west of Ashburn Road. The second entrance to the highway for northbound traffic on Ashburn Road is via a loop ramp situated south of Highway 7. The eastbound diamond off ramp tees into Ashburn Road. Consideration was given to the provision of a Parclo A4 configuration on both the north side and the south side of Highway 407. However, given the close proximity of the Baldwin Street interchange to the east and Highway 7 to the north, a Parclo A4 configuration is not feasible at this location. The entrance and exit ramps between Ashburn Road and Baldwin Street would overlap. The separation between the north ramp terminal intersection and the Highway 7 / Ashburn Road intersection would be in the order of 100 m.
10 Page 8 Memorandum, May 24, 2016 Reconfiguration of the Baldwin Street interchange was also considered to assess the feasibility of broadening the range of interchange designs for the Ashburn Road location. However, even with the provision of a Parclo AB interchange configuration at Baldwin Street which situates all the ramps on the east side of Baldwin Street, it is not possible to achieve the minimum weaving lengths since Ashburn Road and Baldwin Street are situated less than 1 km apart. Furthermore, notwithstanding the significant cost and time involved to redesign and reconstruct the Baldwin Street interchange, a Parclo AB interchange configuration at Baldwin Street does not offer the same operational and safety performance as the currently constructed Parclo A4 interchange and may negatively impact on planned transitway infrastructure at Baldwin Street. Key advantages and disadvantages of the Ashburn Road interchange design alternative are identified in Exhibit 5. Exhibit 5: Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Ashburn Road Interchange Design Alternative Alternative Advantages Disadvantages Ashburn Road Alt 1 (Not Recommended for Future Review) Achieves minimum spacing to Hwy 412 interchange (3 km) Exceeds minimum weaving lengths to Hwy 412 ramps (1) Accommodates partial moves only (to and from the west) Non-standard interchange configuration with on-ramps provided from different arterial roads Spacing to Baldwin Street interchange is less than typical minimum 2 km requirement (i.e. 1 km); however weaving is not an issue as there are no easterly oriented ramps Approach grades on Ashburn Road in vicinity of Hwy 407 crossing are approx. 6%; profile adjustments will be required to achieve maximum 3% grade required for ramp terminal intersection Requires widening of watercourse structure and Highway 7 structure east of Cochrane Street and Ashburn Road structure Moderate footprint requirement relative to other alternatives (6 ha) Low cost relative to other alternatives Notes: 1. Traffic analysis required to confirm operational performance of weaving sections acceptable. 4. Next Steps On the basis of the conceptual review documented in this memorandum, an interchange at Cochrane Street is preferred as it better complies with MTO design principles and guidelines, subject to further review including traffic operations analysis. The following additional work is expected to be required to obtain MTO approval of an additional interchange on the Highway 407 Mainline between Highway 412 and Baldwin Street:
11 Page 9 Memorandum, May 24, 2016 Demonstrate the need for an additional interchange: On the basis of the transportation modelling and assessment work undertaken for the 407 East, it was determined that the proposed interchanges at Lake Ridge Road and Baldwin Street and the north-south crossings of the 407 East transportation corridor through this area have sufficient capacity to accommodate the projected 2031 traffic demands. The Town of hitby will need to demonstrate to the Ministry why an additional interchange is required to serve the planned development in the Brooklin area. Traffic operations analysis: Traffic operations analysis will be required to demonstrate that the introduction of an additional interchange on the Highway 407 mainline between Highway 412 and Baldwin Street will not negatively impact the capacity and operation of the Highway 407 mainline and the adjacent interchanges. Feasibility Study: It would be beneficial to conduct a feasibility study to confirm feasible interchange design alternatives from a capacity, operations and safety perspective taking into consideration potential land use and environmental impacts and obtain Ministry support for a new interchange prior to proceeding with a Class Environmental Assessment Study. Class Environmental Assessment Study: A Class Study will be required to obtain environmental clearance for a new interchange between Highway 412 and Baldwin Street. The study should examine, as a minimum, the need and justification for a new interchange and the impacts of the proposed changes on the footprint, capacity and operation of the Highway 407 mainline and the adjacent interchanges. The study should also include mitigation measures acceptable to the Ministry that would address any impacts to the Highway 407 mainline and adjacent interchanges. The technically preferred alternative and associated design will require MTO endorsement as part of the study process. As stated in the 407 East Report, the following key constraints will need to be addressed to MTO s satisfaction when reviewing future interchange proposals at Cochrane Street: The 4.9% grade of Cochrane Street is greater than the MTO maximum standard grade of 3.0% for ramp terminal intersections; The design speed of Cochrane Street would need to be reduced from 80 km /h to km/h to satisfy turning sight distance criteria at the south ramp terminal; The intersection spacing of ramp terminals and Cochrane Street / Highway 7 (approximately 250 m) will be less than the minimum MTO standard of 300 m; The MTO standard for interchange spacing is 3-8 km between arterial and freeway interchanges. Cochrane Street is 2 km east of the est Durham Link Interchange (Highway 412). As noted in previous sections of this memorandum, tighter interchange and intersection spacing may be accepted by the Ministry if the traffic operations analysis demonstrates acceptable traffic operations can be achieved. ith the urbanization of the Cochrane Street area, interchange spacing in the 2 km to 3 km range would comply with typical MTO guidelines. Further, a reduced speed limit on Cochrane Street should be in keeping with the urbanizing condition for the area. Modifications to the Cochrane Street profile will be required to the north and south of the Highway 407 bridge to achieve an acceptable grade on Cochrane Street through the ramp terminal intersections.
12 Page 10 Memorandum, May 24, 2016 Appendix A Conceptual Interchange Design Alternatives
13 NO RT H Lane NG NG Cochra n m e Stree t Country M37 B 2 50 R R = 55 N/ AM S- P N/ P E-N/S S Ashbu RAMP M RA PO FU TE N RA TUR TIA M E L 55 P RAMP N/S-E m Highwa y7 rn Roa d M37 EB Cochra ne Street Lane m Country M39 B M39 EB Highw 0m 91 ay 7 G N 0m 74 G N
14 NO RT H Lane NG NG Cochra n m e Stree t Country M37 B 2 R 50 R = 55 N/ AM S- P 13 rn Roa d M37 EB 0 S E-N/S -N/ P Ashbu RAMP M RA RAM P N/S -E m Highwa y7 Cochra ne Street Lane m Country M39 B M39 EB Highw 0m 91 ay 7 G N 5m 74 G N
15 NO RT H Lane e Stree M37 B M37 EB 50 RAMP N/S R RA =55 S- MP 13 rn Roa d 10 0 RAMP M RA E-N/S -N/ P RA N MP -E 5 S Ashbu NG Cochra n NG Highwa y RAMP N/S-E m Cochra ne Street Lane m Country 910 m t Country 435 M39 B M39 EB Highw 0m 91 ay 7 G N 0m 74 G N
16 NO RT H t E AV E e Stree 5k m NG Cochra n 1. 2 M37 B t Ashbu E AV EL EN GT H e Stree Highway 7 M39 B RA MP E M39 EB 54m Highw ay 250 RAMP RA M P 55 S -N/S 13 0 n Road BA RA LD MP IN - BN N/S A shb ur 1k m Cochra n 2.0 rn Roa d M37 EB BA RA LD MP IN N- BN S 7
DRAFT. SR-60 7 th Avenue Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) I-605 Corridor Improvement Project (CIP) I-605/SR-60 EA# 3101U0
SR-60 7 th Avenue Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) I-605/SR-60 EA# 3101U0 October 9, 2017 Contents 1 Purpose of ICE Memo... 1 2 Background... 1 3 Existing Interchange Deficiencies... 1 4 Context Sensitive
More informationInterchange Improvements at the Queen Elizabeth Way and Glendale Avenue
Welcome to the Public Information Centre for the Interchange Improvements at the Queen Elizabeth Way and Glendale Avenue Class Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Design Study G.W.P. 2423-15-00 http://qew-glendale-interchange.ca
More informationA three-stage process was implemented in order to develop and evaluate the project concepts and provide recommendations for the project.
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Highway 36/Rice Street PMT Mark Benson DATE: March 23, 2009 RE: Selection of a Preferred Alternative SEH No. 105803 The purpose of this memorandum is to document the process for selecting
More informationI 75 PD&E STUDIES TABLE OF CONTENTS DTTM, TECHNICAL REPORT No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS DTTM, TECHNICAL REPORT No. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO. SECTION TITLE NO. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -------------------------------------------------------------------- ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION
More informationCHAPTER 5 PARALLEL PARKWAY CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
HPTER 5 PRLLEL PRKWY ORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS nother key area within the Village West study area is the Parallel Parkway corridor. This chapter focuses on the segment of Parallel Parkway between 106 th Street
More informationThe Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges
The Folded Interchange: An Unconventional Design for the Reconstruction of Cloverleaf Interchanges I. ABSTRACT Keith A. Riniker, PE, PTOE This paper presents the Folded Interchange design and compares
More informationTRANSPORTATION PROJECT REPORT DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002
TRANSPORTATION INTERSTATE 87 INTERCHANGE 11A TOWN OF MALTA SARATOGA COUNTY, NY DRAFT CONCEPTUAL ACCESS MODIFICATION PROPOSAL OCTOBER 2002 PROJECT REPORT NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JOSEPH
More informationFOR INTERSTATE 81 AND ROUTE 37 INTERCHANGE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MILEPOST 310
INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT FOR INTERSTATE 81 AND ROUTE 37 INTERCHANGE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA MILEPOST 310 PREPARED BY: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STAUNTON DISTRICT DECEMBER 13, 2006
More informationConsideration of a Diverging Diamond Interchange in Saskatchewan. Paul H. A. Steel, Project Manager, M. Eng., P.Eng., Tetra Tech EBA Inc.
Consideration of a Diverging Diamond Interchange in Saskatchewan Paul H. A. Steel, Project Manager, M. Eng., P.Eng., Tetra Tech EBA Inc. Terry Schmidt, P.Eng., MBA, Senior Project Director, Tetra Tech
More informationAppendix C - Highway 400 Widening and Interchange Evaluation Summary Tables
Highway 400 Improvements from 1 km South of Highway 89 to the Junction of Highway 11 Appendix C - Highway 400 Widening and Interchange Tables Prepared for: Ontario Ministry of Transportation Four General
More informationI-35/80 Operations Study: Douglas Avenue to NW 86 th Street FOR
: Douglas Avenue to NW 86 th Street FOR Iowa Department of Transportation City of Urbandale City of Grimes February 7, 2013 FINAL Prepared by: HR Green, Inc. HR Green Project Number: 40110031 TABLE OF
More informationUS 14 EIS (New Ulm to N. Mankato) Interchange and Intersection Type Comparison
T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M US 14 EIS (New Ulm to N. Mankato) Interchange and Intersection Type Comparison PREPARED FOR: Mn/DOT District 7 PREPARED BY: CH2M HILL DATE: March 27, 2007 This technical
More informationConclusions & Lessons Learned
What is a DDI Recommended Practices Traffic Operations Analysis Geometric Design FHWA Review Conclusions & Lessons Learned It s not about you, it s about the public Developed by Access Utah County
More informationMEMORANDUM: INITIAL CONCEPTS SUMMARY
MEMORANDUM: INITIAL CONCEPTS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION This memo presents a summary of initial concepts that have been identified as development of the project study has progressed, along with a recommendations
More informationINTERACTIVE HIGHWAY SAFETY DESIGN MODEL (IHSDM)
INTERACTIVE HIGHWAY SAFETY DESIGN MODEL (IHSDM) TSITE 2016 Winter Meeting Nashville, TN February 25, 2016 AGENDA Project History IHSDM: Background & Overview IHSDM: Interstate 24 Model IHSDM: Interstate
More informationINTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT
INTERSTATE 75 AND STATE ROAD 884 (COLONIAL BOULEVARD) INTERCHANGE LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT Prepared for: Florida Department of Transportation District One May 2017 Interchange
More informationAPPENDIX A TIER 1 ANALYSIS
SPN H.004100 FEASIBILITY STUDY APPENDIX A TIER 1 ANALYSIS 040-012-042AH Appendices Lead Sheets PROVIDENCE STATE PROJECT. H.004100 The following worksheets analyze various project alternatives at various
More informationEnvironmental Consequences and Mitigation
Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences and Mitigation 4.1 Introduction This chapter provides a detailed description of the impacts (and indirect impacts where applicable) associated with the alternatives
More informationCHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES
CHAPTER 4 GRADE SEPARATIONS AND INTERCHANGES 4.0 INTRODUCTION The ability to accommodate high volumes of intersecting traffic safely and efficiently through the arrangement of one or more interconnecting
More informationMilitary Highway Interchange
III. Military Highway Interchange Deficiencies Design Challenges Proposed Alternatives III.1.2 Volumes & Operations Figure III.2: Existing Volumes displays the existing volumes for the Military Highway
More informationExit 73 I-29 Interchange Modification Justification Study
xit 73 I-29 Interchange Modification Justification tudy Introduction Figure 1 shows the location of xit 73. This interchange is proposed to be the connecting point of the ast and West Corridors to I-29.
More informationTraffic Impact Studies
G U I D E Ministry of Transportation General Guidelines for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies L I N E S January 2008 1.0 Introduction: The main purpose of a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is to demonstrate
More information500 Interchange Design
500 Interchange Design Table of Contents 501 Interchange Design... 1 501.1 General... 1 501.2 Interchange Type... 1 501.2.1 General... 1 502 Interchange Design Considerations... 2 502.1 Determination of
More informationCHAPTER 8: I-71 ACCESS IMPROVEMNETS
CHAPTER 8: I-71 ACCESS IMPROVEMNETS I-71 Access Improvements were a separate and distinct part of the overall Uptown Transportation Study. This Part B work is fully documented in the Planning Study Report
More informationExisting vs. Proposed Ramp Noise Sensitivity Analysis Austin Boulevard Interchange
I-290 Phase I Study West of US 45 (Mannheim Road) to Racine Avenue Existing vs. Proposed Ramp Noise Sensitivity Analysis Austin Boulevard Interchange Technical Memorandum Prepared By: Huff & Huff, Inc.
More informationWELCOME. Public Meeting for I-35 / I-44 Interchange. October 6, 2015
WELCOME Public Meeting for I-35 / I-44 Interchange October 6, 2015 TEAM INTRODUCTIONS PURPOSE OF THIS MEETING is to present the alternative alignments for the I-35/I-44 and I-35/NE 63rd Street Interchanges
More information500 Interchange Design
500 Interchange Design Table of Contents 501 Interchange Design... 5-1 July 2015 501.1 General... 5-1 501.2 Interchange Type... 5-1 501.2.1 General... 5-1 502 Interchange Design Considerations... 5-2 502.1
More informationCommunity Advisory Committee Meeting No. 2. June 22, 2006
Community Advisory Committee Meeting No. 2 June 22, 2006 Introductions The Study Team KDOT Wichita Partners Consultants CAC members Overview Today s Agenda Opinion Survey Study Status Starting Concept
More informationEnvironmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre
Waste Management of Canada Corporation Environmental Assessment for a New Landfill Footprint at the West Carleton Environmental Centre TRANSPORTATION DETAILED IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared by: AECOM 302-1150
More informationBeltline Interchange Range of Alternatives Screening Summary Memo
Range of Alternatives Screening Summary Memo (Concurrence Point #2 from the Agency Coordination Plan) (I-39/90 and US 12/18 Interchange) Dane County, Wisconsin WisDOT Project ID 1007-10-02 Table of Contents
More informationInterchange Workshop Report (August 2004)
U.S. Highway 14 Corridor Study New Ulm to North Mankato Table of Contents Section Interchange Workshop Report (August 2004) Page 1. Introduction and Next Steps 1 2. Interchange Workshop Participants &
More informationI 95 EXPRESS LANES SOUTHERN TERMINUS EXTENSION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
I 95 EXPRESS LANES SOUTHERN TERMINUS EXTENSION TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT February 2016 INTERSTATE 95 EXPRESS LANES SOUTHERN TERMINUS EXTENSION PROJECT Commonwealth of Virginia Virginia
More informationLOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM GENERAL SUBJECT: Design Exceptions / Waivers SPECIFIC SUBJECT: Design Exception Request Form
More informationOverall project. The $288 million Phase 2 DesignBuild project starts construction. this spring, with completion by December 31, 2016
Overall project Johnson County Gateway Interchange Project Improvements 87th Street The $288 million Phase 2 DesignBuild project starts construction this spring, with completion by December 31, 2016 Phase
More informationGRE PID 80468
Assessment of Feasible Alternatives Prepared for Ohio Department of Transportation 505 South SR 741 Lebanon, OH 45036-9518 December 2011 One Dayton Centre, Suite 1100 One South Main Street Dayton, OH 45402
More informationPROJECT STUDY REPORT. Cal Poly Pomona Senior Project
06/2014 PROJECT STUDY REPORT (Cal Poly Pomona Senior Project) For Conceptual Approval of an Interchange Improvement And Cooperative Agreement with The City of Lake Elsinore for completion of Project Approval
More informationAppendix F: Noise Report
Appendix F: Noise Report HIGHWAY 404 HIGHWAY 407 TO GREEN LANE (W.O. 03-20024) REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK NOISE REPORT Preliminary Design and Class Environmental Assessment Study Class Environmental
More informationStage One Reference Design Enhancements. Date: 2 October Cabinet-in-Confidence
Stage One Reference Design Enhancements Date: 2 October 2013 Introduction This paper provides further information regarding the proposed enhancements to the Reference Design that have been identified since
More informationIH 30/IH 35E Reconstruction Project Pegasus Final Technical Memorandum - Evaluation of Conceptual Alternatives Task 7.5
MEMO TO: Timothy Nesbitt, P.E. DATE: August 26, 2002 FROM: SUBJECT: Sandy Wesch-Schulze, P.E., AICP IH 30/IH 35E Reconstruction Project Pegasus Final Technical Memorandum - Evaluation of Conceptual Alternatives
More informationBowen Road and Queen Elizabeth Way Interchange
Bowen Road and Queen Elizabeth Way Interchange Preliminary Design and 30% Detail Design G.W.P. 2482-04-02 Fort Erie, Niagara Region Class Environmental Assessment (Group B) Presentation to Fort Erie Council
More informationLOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOCATION AND DESIGN DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL AND INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM GENERAL SUBJECT: Interstate, NHS Non-Interstate and Non-NHS (IJR / IMR Guidance) SPECIFIC SUBJECT:
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The IP developed the following purpose and need statement for the Part B I-71 Access Improvement Study.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments (OKI) has conducted the with the following purpose: Develop a comprehensive transportation plan for the Uptown area that serves
More informationSummary. Preliminary Alternative Development and Screening. DEIS July 23, 2018
What is the Carolina Crossroads Project? The South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is proposing to upgrade and redesign a key
More informationConceptual Design Report
Conceptual Design Report I-244/Arkansas River Multimodal Bridge Tulsa, Oklahoma Prepared for the Oklahoma Department of Transportation Prepared by: August 2009 I-244 / ARKANSAS RIVER MULTIMODAL BRIDGE
More informationInterchange Design. Nick Hoernke, Bill Roth and Eric Sorensen
Interchange Design Nick Hoernke, Bill Roth and Eric Sorensen Presentation Overview Interchange Characteristics Process for Interchange Type Selection Service Interchange System Interchange New Type of
More informationFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Planning and Environmental Management Office INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Planning and Environmental Management Office INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT District 2 1109 South Marion Avenue Lake City, FL 32025-5874 INTERSTATE 10 (SR 8) / SR
More informationMEMORANDUM. Date: July 14, 2006 Project #: To: US 97 & US 20 Refinement Plan Steering Committee
MEMORANDUM Date: July 14, 2006 Project #: 6389 To: US 97 & US 20 Refinement Plan Steering Committee From: Sonia Hennum, P.E., Andrew Cibor, E.I.T., & Julia Kuhn, P.E. Project: US 97 & US 20 Refinement
More informationINTERCHANGE SAFETY. Steve Allen. Houston Daugherty. Director, Strategic Transportation Investments Division (TDOT)
INTERCHANGE SAFETY Steve Allen Director, Strategic Transportation Investments Division (TDOT) Houston Daugherty Director of Transportation & Traffic (Cannon & Cannon Inc.) 2014 TSITE Summer Meeting August
More information5/11/2016 SR 15 SECTION 088 CSVT SOUTHERN SECTION SR 15 SECTION 088 CSVT SOUTHERN SECTION AGENDA
PUBLIC OFFICIALS MEETING MAY 11, 2016 AGENDA I. INTRODUCTIONS V. CURRENT PROJECT STATUS VI. PROJECT SCHEDULE VII. UPCOMING ACTIVITIES VOPEN DISCUSSION & QUESTIONS IX. ACTION ITEMS 1 A. Bridge Lighting
More informationDDI s Can Move More Than Cars. Alex Ariniello. Presentation for the ITE Western District Annual Meeting. July, 2016 in Albuquerque, New Mexico
DDI s Can Move More Than Cars Alex Ariniello Presentation for the ITE Western District Annual Meeting July, 2016 in Albuquerque, New Mexico In January, 2016, a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) opened
More informationA Unique Application of Railroad Preemption with Queue Mitigation at a Roundabout Interchange
A Unique Application of Railroad Preemption with Queue Mitigation at a Roundabout Interchange Jeromy Grenard, PE, PTOE American Structurepoint Hardik Shah, PE, PTOE American Structurepoint Roundabouts
More informationHighway 22X & Highway 791 Functional Planning Study
FINAL REPORT Highway 22X & Highway 791 Functional Planning Study Alberta Transportation Presented to: Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation Southern Region Willowglen Business Park 803 Manning Road
More informationPUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING TUESDAY MARCH 9, 2010
St. Francis Drive Corridor Study Draft Phase B Review 1 PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING TUESDAY MARCH 9, 2010 Objective Present Alternatives Evaluated Solicit Feedback On Selection of Recommended Projects 2
More informationNW La Center Road/I-5 Interchange Improvement Project (MP 16.80)
FINAL DRAFT - NW La Center Road/I-5 Interchange Improvement Project (MP 16.80) La Center, Washington February 2015 FINAL DRAFT - NW La Center Road/I-5 Interchange Improvement Project (MP 16.80) La Center,
More informationI-95 Corridor Study Phase II Highway Element
I-95 Corridor Study Phase II Highway Element FAMPO Policy Committee July 16, 2018 1 I-95 Phase 2 Study Final Report A final report is being created to document the findings of the I-95 Phase 2 Study and
More informationDiverging Diamond Interchanges in Michigan
2015 MDOT / ACEC Partnering Workshop Diverging Diamond Interchanges in Michigan Lori Swanson MDOT Oakland TSC John Katers OHM Advisors Chris Van Norwick MDOT Grand Region Rob Leppala TranSystems Topics
More informationOn behalf of the Carolina Crossroads project team we thank you for taking the time to attend this meeting.
On behalf of the Carolina Crossroads project team we thank you for taking the time to attend this meeting. Located in the heart of South Carolina, the I-20/26/126 Corridor is the crossroads of the state
More informationDEVELOPMENT, ANALYSIS, AND DESIGN OF A NEW PARKWAY AT GRADE INTERSECTION (PAGI)
2013 ITE Western District Annual Meeting COCEPT DEVELOPMET, AALYSIS, AD DESIG OF A EW PARKWAY AT GRADE ITERSECTIO (PAGI) Lead Author: James M. Witkowski, PhD Supporting Author: Darrell Truitt, PE The Pima
More informationFunctional Planning Study Highway 15:06 From Range Road 220 to Highway 830
Functional Planning Study :06 December 2016 E00311A Executive Summary Strathcona County, as requirement of the roadside development permit from Alberta Transportation for the intersection upgrade of
More informationDRAFT HARVIE ROAD/BIG BAY POINT ROAD/HIGHWAY 400 CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY E N V I R O N M E N T A L ST U D Y R E P O R T
DRAFT HARVIE ROAD/BIG BAY POINT ROAD/HIGHWAY 400 CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY E N V I R O N M E N T A L ST U D Y R E P O R T M O R R I S O N H E R S H F I E L D L I M I T E D 235 YORKLAND BOULEVARD,
More informationInformational Brochure. Proposed Interchange. Interstate Route 295 (I-295) AT Greenville Avenue (State Route 5) Town of Johnston, Rhode Island
Informational Brochure Proposed Interchange OF Interstate Route 295 (I-295) AT Greenville Avenue (State Route 5) Town of Johnston, Rhode Island October 5, 2016 Department of Transportation Two Capitol
More informationRoute 7 Connector Ramp MODIF IE D I N T ER C H A N G E M OD IFICATIO N R E PO RT TRA N S F O R M I : I N S ID E THE BE LTWAY
STATE PROJECT NUMBER: 0066-96A-493,P101, C501, B686; UPC: 110629 FEDERAL PROJECT NUMBER: NHPP-066-1(356) FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA TRA N S F O R M I - 6 6 : I N S ID E THE BE LTWAY Route 7 Connector Ramp
More informationNCHRP 3-88 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing
Session 312 Updates on NCHRP-Funded Geometric Design Research Projects NCHRP 3-88 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing Brian L. Ray, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc Portland, Oregon bray@ kittelson.com
More informationTraffic Analysis. Appendix I
FHWA #T-A000(18) / NHDOT #13742 Bow Concord Improvements Appendix I Traffic Analysis The traffic analysis for the project was conducted using the Bow-Concord Traffic Microsimulation Model prepared specifically
More informationFINAL REPORT GUIDELINES FOR PRELIMINARY SELECTION OF THE OPTIMUM INTERCHANGE TYPE FOR A SPECIFIC LOCATION
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES FOR PRELIMINARY SELECTION OF THE OPTIMUM INTERCHANGE TYPE FOR A SPECIFIC LOCATION Nicholas J. Garber, Ph.D. Faculty Research Scientist and Professor of Civil Engineering Michael
More informationPEER REVIEW FOR TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT ZONING APPLICATION REVIEW
PEER REVIEW FOR TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT ZONING APPLICATION REVIEW REPORT MARCH 2011 I B I G R O U P R E P O R T TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. SYNOPSIS OF APPLICANT S ASSESSMENT... 1 2.1 Transportation
More informationI-10 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 0 FEASIBILITY STUDY STATE PROJECT NUMBER H FEDERAL AID PROJECT NUMBER H004100
JULY 2016 I-10 CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS STAGE 0 FEASIBILITY STUDY STATE PROJECT NUMBER H.004100 FEDERAL AID PROJECT NUMBER H004100 EAST BATON ROUGE AND WEST BATON ROUGE PARISHES, LOUISIANA Section TABLE OF
More informationI-65/I-70 North Split Project
I-65/I-70 North Split Project Public Open House October 10, 2018 Alternatives Development Process Define Problems Identify Context Gather Input Define Alternatives Balance Trade-Offs Select Alternative
More informationNCHRP Report 687 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing
Updates on NCHRP-Funded Geometric Design Research Projects NCHRP Report 687 Guidelines for Ramp and Interchange Spacing Brian L. Ray, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc Portland, Oregon bray@ kittelson.com
More information407 TRANSITWAY - KENNEDY ROAD TO BROCK ROAD MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION
Executive Summary 407 TRANSITWAY - KENNEDY ROAD TO BROCK ROAD MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION E. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E.1. E.1.1. Background 407 Transitway Background and Status The planned 407
More informationVicinity Map. Interstate 605 (I-605) and State Route 91 (SR-91) in Los Angeles County
07 - LA - 605 - PM 2.87/PM 6.36 07 - LA - 91 - PM 14.10/PM 19.81 Vicinity Map N On Routes Interstate 605 (I-605) and State Route 91 (SR-91) in Los Angeles County I-605 between Excelsior Dr UC (PM 6.36)
More informationTHE PROJECT. Executive Summary. City of Industry. City of Diamond Bar. 57/60 Confluence.
THE PROJECT A freeway segment ranked 6th worst in the Nation, with levels of congestion, pollution and accidents that are simply unacceptable and which have Statewide and National implications. Executive
More informationCalibration of a Micro-Simulation Model in a Large Urban Network
in a Large Urban Network Timothy Oketch, Ph.D., P. Eng., Director, TIMCON Associates, 37 Portelli Crescent, Ajax, Ontario, LZ1 0C4, Email: TOketch@timcon.net, http://www.timcon.net (formerly Senior Project
More informationTransportation Connectivity, Accessibility and Economic Opportunity Study
COMMERCE CORRIDOR Transportation Connectivity, Accessibility and Economic Opportunity Study Richmond Regional Transportation Planning Organization Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee 9/15/2016 Photo:
More informationI-65/I-70 North Split Project. Alternatives Screening Report CAC Meeting October 9, 2018
I-65/I-70 North Split Project Alternatives Screening Report CAC Meeting October 9, 2018 Alternatives Development Process Define Problems Identify Context Gather Input Define Alternatives Balance Trade-Offs
More informationSouth Dakota Department of Transportation. Interchange Modification Justification Report. Interstate 90 Exit 44 (Bethlehem Road - Piedmont)
South Dakota Department of Transportation Interchange Modification Justification Report Interstate 90 Exit 44 (Bethlehem Road - Piedmont) February 28, 2014 Prepared By: SDDOT Office of Project Development
More informationFY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM New Jersey Department of Transportation Project Descriptions ($ millions)
FY 2018-2027 WIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM NY Susquehanna and Western Rail Line Bicycle/Pedestrian Path DBNUM: NS9803 / UPC: 058018 The 4.8 mile New York, Susquehanna, and Western Railway (NYS&W)
More informationPlacerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future
Placerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future City Manager s Report June 24, 2014 City Council Meeting Prepared by: Nathan Stong, City Engineer Item #: Subject: Adopt a Resolution:
More informationWoodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report
Final Report Woodburn Interchange Project Transportation Technical Report Prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation April 212 Prepared by DKS Associates Contents Methodologies... 4 Volume Development...
More information5.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
5.0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 5.1 INTRODUCTION A preliminary environmental review was performed on the proposed freeway improvements that form Concept C, which encompasses the three freeway corridors
More informationRapid City, SD HDR Project No RE: Replacement of Existing I-190 Twin Bridges at I-190/Silver Street Interchange, Rapid City, SD
To: Steve Gramm, SDDOT Memo From: HDR Project: SDDOT I-190 Silver Street Interchange Study Rapid City, SD HDR Project No. 000000000137390 Date: December 27, 2011 RE: Replacement of Existing I-190 Twin
More informationChapter GRADE SEPARATIONS & INTERCHANGES
Chapter 9 GRADE SEPARATIONS & INTERCHANGES 2012 ODOT Highway Design Manual Grade Separations And Interchanges 9.1 GENERAL INFORMATION There are three types of roadway intersections: intersections at-grade,
More informationSITE AREA AERIAL PHOTO
ward consulting group EXHIBIT 1.2 SITE AREA AERIAL PHOTO 168 STREET 164 STREET 32 AVENUE 28 AVENUE 24 AVENUE 160 STREET HIGHWAY 99 156 STREET HIGHWAY 99A PHOTO DATE: YEAR 2004 152 STREET 1480 ward consulting
More informationOperational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons. Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013
Operational Analysis of Dulles Toll Road Ramps to Tysons Board Transportation Committee Meeting September 17, 2013 Seyed Nabavi Fairfax County Department of Transportation 1 Agenda Overview & Assumptions
More informationAPPENDIX B. Excerpts from the October 2002 Conceptual Alternatives Report
APPENDIX B Excerpts from the October 2002 Interstate 83 and PA Route 921 The objective for the SR 921 interchange site was to study alternatives for construction of a new interchange. There are no short-term
More informationFRASER RIVER CROSSING PLANNING AND EVALUATION STUDY
FRASER RIVER CROSSING PLANNING AND EVALUATION STUDY Prepared by Dillon Consulting Ltd. of Richmond B.C. September 1999 FRASER RIVER CROSSING PLANNING AND EVALUATION STUDY Introduction... 1 Objectives...
More informationGEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects
GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation Projects SEPTEMBER 1989 Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department GEOMETRIC DESIGN CRITERIA for Non-freeway
More informationCLA /10.54, PID Project Description:
Project Description: The proposed project will consist of widening IR 70 to three lanes from Enon Road (SLM 06.75) to the US 68 interchange ramps (SLM 10.55). IR 70 is a component of the Strategic Highway
More informationSt. Francis Drive through the City of Santa Fe Corridor Study
VIII. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS SOUTHERN For the southern end of the corridor, traffic volumes are expected to increase over existing levels. The Phase A Report
More informationNORTHWEST CORRIDOR PROJECT. NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum Phase IV
Noise Technical Report 2015 Addendum NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT 2015 Addendum PREPARED FOR: Federal Highway Administration and Georgia Department of Transportation PREPARED BY: Parsons Brinckerhoff Project
More informationChapter 4: Transportation and Circulation
Chapter 4: Transportation and Circulation 4.1 Introduction Circulation improvements constructed for the West Valley Logistics Center will improve the functional efficiency of the circulation system in
More informationEFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF A PUBLIC- PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERSHIP: A CASE STUDY
EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF A PUBLIC- PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERSHIP: A CASE STUDY Highway 401/407 Interchange (East of Trafalgar Road in the Region of Halton) Ramp from Westbound Highway 407 to Westbound
More informationFlorida s Turnpike Enterprise Tentative Five-Year Work Program - FY 2015/16 thru FY 2019/20 Summary of Projects in FDOT District Four
DISTRICT FOUR PROJECT OVERVIEW Florida s Turnpike Enterprise continues to make significant project investments in District Four. In fiscal years 2014 and 2015, current Turnpike projects total over $127
More informationI-95 Corridor Study Phase II Highway Element
I-95 Corridor Study Phase II Highway Element FAMPO Policy Committee February 26, 2018 1 Activity in January & February 1. Numerous discussion with VDOT to better understand the scope of recently funded
More informationAPPENDIX B. Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies
APPENDIX B Public Works and Development Engineering Services Division Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies Revised December 7, 2010 via Resolution # 100991 Reformatted March 18, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationAlternatives Evaluation Methodology
Alternatives Evaluation Methodology www.vision54 56.com B 1 Phase 2 Alternatives Evaluation Methodology PASCO COUNTY METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 8731 Citizens Drive New Port Richey, FL 34654 Ph
More informationSouth Dakota Interstate Corridor Study. Phase I Summary Report
South Dakota Interstate Corridor Study Phase I Summary Report December 2000 Prepared for: South Dakota Department of Transportation 700 East Broadway Avenue Pierre, South Dakota 57501-2586 Prepared by:
More informationLOCATION HYDRAULIC REPORT
Draft LOCATION HYDRAULIC REPORT Florida Department of Transportation District One US 41 at Fruitville Road (CR 780) Intersection Improvements - PD&E STUDY Sarasota County, Florida Financial Project ID
More informationKris Haynes, C.Tech Project Manager - Ottawa Monarch Corporation. cc Steno jcd
IBI Group 333 Preston Street Ottawa ON K1S 5N Canada tel 613 225 1311 fax 613 225 9868 Memorandum To/Attention Kris Haynes, C.Tech Project Manager - Ottawa Monarch Corporation Date February 2, 21 From
More information04 ALA /6.7. Vicinity Map
04 ALA 80 6.5/6.7 04 ALA 80 6.5/6.7 Vicinity Map Note: I-80 is designated as an east-west freeway. Gilman Street is referred to as a northsouth urban arterial for the remainder of the report. 04 ALA 80
More information