Des Moines Area MPO. MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization

Transcription

1 Des Moines Area MPO MPO Planning Subcommittee Meeting March 3, Des M oines Area M etropolitan Planning Organization

2 Agenda 1. Call To Order 2. VOTE: Approval of Agenda 3. VOTE: Approval of Meeting Minutes 4. REPORT: Growth Scenario Follow-Up 5. REPORT: Long-Range Transportation Plan Data Analysis 6. REPORT: Design Node Assistance (DNA) Program 7. REPORT: Fiscal Year 2015 Unified Planning Work Program 8. REPORT: Plug-In Readiness 9. Other Non-Action Items of Interest to the Committee 10.Future Meeting Dated: To Be Determined 11.Adjournment

3 Growth Scenario Overview What is it? A prediction of where future growth and development my occur. Why is it important? The number of people and jobs in an area impacts transportation, and vice versa Is an input to a travel demand model, which provide forecasted traffic volumes and transit ridership.

4 Final Step - Suballocation to TAZs Subareas Traffic Analysis Zones

5 Growth Scenario Overview MPO staff ed Scenario 4 TAZs in mid-february. Discussion: Is the TAZ file a good place to start? How can the scenario be adjusted to reflect short-term investments already made yet strive for growth as recommended in The Tomorrow Plan? How does the process shift from the Planning Subcommittee to all communities?

6 Planning Analysis Data about the transportation system is collected and analyzed Existing issues and trends can be identified Targets and preferred trends can be established Allows strategies to be compared to see how well they meet targets and address issues Helps explore what levels of funding are necessary to achieve desired outcomes

7 Existing issues and trends: Pavement Legend MPO Planning Area Very Poor (0-20) Poor (21-40) Fair (41-60) Good (61-80) Excellent (81-100)

8 Goal: Infrastructure and services that are well managed and optimized Objective: Rehabilitate existing infrastructure. Current status: 60 PCI Target? What does it take to achieve target?

9 Existing issues and trends: Bridge Deficiencies

10 Goal: Infrastructure and services that are well managed and optimized Objective: Rehabilitate existing infrastructure. Current status: 100 out of 405 bridges (25%) are deficient Target: No more than % of bridges are deficient What does it take to achieve target?

11 Goal: Infrastructure and services that are well managed and optimized Objective: Decrease vehicle miles traveled per capita. Current status: VMT/capita (average weekday) Target:? What does it take to achieve target? Vehicle Miles Traveled (Average Weekday) Base S1 S2 S3 S4 VMT 11,504,838 19,990,819 19,779,816 19,139,451 18,319,905 POP 480, , , , ,000 VMT/Person

12 Existing issues and trends: Level of Service (2050) Percent of Roadway Miles by Level of Service (peak hours) LOS Base S1 S2 S3 S4 A 65.4% 32.0% 34.4% 36.4% 40.4% B 19.8% 22.3% 19.8% 20.2% 20.1% C 10.0% 20.0% 20.6% 20.6% 19.7% D 3.0% 12.6% 12.0% 10.8% 10.6% E 1.2% 8.2% 8.6% 8.2% 6.1% F 0.6% 5.0% 4.6% 3.8% 3.2%

13 Goal: Infrastructure and services that are well managed and optimized Objective: Reduce areas of excessing congestion. Current status: <5% of roadways LOS D or lower Target: What does it take to achieve target?

14 Existing issues and trends: Crash Hot Spots

15 Goal: Further the health, safety and well-being of all residents in the region. Objective: Decrease the number of accidents and injuries across all modes. Current status: (options) 11,000 average annual accidents hot spots Target: Reduce accidents by % Reduce number of hot spot accident locations by What does it take to achieve target?

16 Existing issues and trends: Gaps in Regional Trail System

17 Goal: Further the health, safety and well-being of all residents in the region. Objective: Improve the regional trail system. Current status: (options) Number of gaps Miles of gaps Target: What does it take to achieve target?

18 Existing issues and trends: Environmental Justice (EJ) Areas EJ Area MPO Region % Population 69, ,266 15% Area (sq. miles) %

19 Goal: Further the health, safety and well-being of all residents in the region. Objective: Affordable and equitable transportation opportunities for all sections of society. Current status (options): # of jobs within reasonable travel time (by mode) LOS within vs outside of EJ areas Multimodal options within vs outside of EJ areas Investments within vs outside of EJ areas Target: What does it take to achieve target?

20 Existing issues and trends: Freight Impediments ID Location Type 1 Euclid Ave and 2 nd Ave Intersection 2 Euclid Ave and 6 th Ave Intersection 3 E 30 th St and Scott Ave Intersection 4 2 nd Ave by Firestone, height limits Bridge/Overpass 5 E 18 th St and Market St Railroad Crossing 6 Delaware Ave and Hull Ave Intersection 7 2 nd Ave, from University Ave to Euclid Ave Street/Highway 8 NE 22 nd St, from Broadway Ave to NE 66 th Ave Street/Highway 9 I-35/80 N 26 th Interchange Interstate Highway 10 2 nd Ave to NE 66 th Ave, Low overpass Bridge/Overpass Source: Des Moines Area MPO Goods Movement Study Update Report, 2006.

21 Goal: Provide Multimodal Transportation Options Objective: Reduce freight impediments. Current status: 10 impediments Target: Reduce by 20% What does it take to achieve target?

22 Goal: Provide Multimodal Transportation Options Objective: Increase on-street bike facilities. Current status: 22 miles of on-street bike facilities Target: What does it take to achieve target?

23 Goal: Provide Multimodal Transportation Options Objective: Increase non-single occupancy vehicle mode share for commutes Current status: Trips to downtown for work: 77% single occupancy vehicles (SOV) 7% transit 12% carpool 4% walk/bike/work from home/other Target: Increase transit s share to 20% Increase walk/bike to 5% Increase work from home/other to 5% What does it take to achieve target?

24 Planning Analysis: Data Overlay

25 Design Node Assistance $100,000 available for program Intended to help communities address land use/transportation connections within nodes & corridors Program needs guidelines, scoring process, and so forth

26 FY 2015 Unified Planning Work Program MPO s scope of work for next fiscal year Work elements and activities Committees Costs Proposed work activities are tied to the MPO s federal requirements

27 MPO Requirements per US Code Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Public Participation Plan (PPP) Additional MPO Requirements Congestion Management Process (required of TMAs) Human Service Public Transportation Coordination Plan Must have decision making bodies (e.g., MPO Policy Committee) Administer STP funding process

28 FY 2015 Work Elements MPO Requirements Long-Range Transportation Planning Long-Range Transportation Plan Transportation Systems Planning Long-Range Transportation Plan and Congestion Management Process Public Involvement Public Participation Plan Interagency Coordination Long-Range Transportation Plan Transportation Improvement Program Transportation Improvement Program and STP funding administration 6.0 CIRTPA Unified Planning Work Program Unified Planning Work Program Transit Planning Passenger Transportation Plan Committee Support Administration Information Technology Travel and Training Administration and Support of Decision Making Body Special Projects Long-Range Transportation Plan and Congestion Management Process

29 Notable Projects for FY 2015 Long-Range Transportation Plan Implement DNA program Update ITS Architecture Development impact analysis (with Smart Growth America) Safe Routes to Schools planning Water Trails planning Watershed Management Authorities Other projects for the MPO to consider?

30 Policies and strategies to reduce VMT and encourage multi-modal facilities.

31 Ad-hoc roundtable inspectors, dealers, consumers, etc. GIS mapping Permit process, code changes, incentives, inspector training, etc. Outreach and education

32 Joint subcommittee Research current plans, best practices Macro-level network Feasibility of roads Design standards Education