Lindbergh Field Alternatives Considered

Transcription

1 Presented To: San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Strategic Planning Committee Lindbergh Field Alternatives Considered May 22,

2 Alternatives Considered - Outline Lindbergh Field Site Constraints Terrain Obstructions 2001 Master Plan Concepts Concepts A to G Airport Site Selection Program (ASSP) Concept Concepts 1 to 6 Findings 2001 Master Plan Concept F ASSP Concept 6 Future Technology Summary Comparison 2

3 3 Lindbergh Field Development Constraints

4 Master Plan Concepts

5 2001 Master Plan Concept A Source: HNTB, June Advantages: Builds on existing terminal facilities Implementation and phasing Minimal cost Disadvantages: Does not provide enhanced airfield No enhanced access (no connection to I-5 or rail line) 5

6 2001 Master Plan Concept B1 Source: HNTB, June Advantages: Builds on existing terminal, access and parking facilities Implementation and phasing One of the least expensive concepts Disadvantages: Does not provide enhanced airfield capacity or reliability No enhanced access (no connection to I- 5 or rail line) 6

7 2001 Master Plan Concept B2 Source: HNTB, June Advantages: Takes advantage of access to I-5 and rail line Builds on existing terminal facilities Implementation and phasing Disadvantages: Does not provide enhanced airfield capacity or reliability Split terminal complex scenario 7

8 2001 Master Plan Concept C Source: HNTB, June Advantages: Provides increase in airfield capacity with parallel runways Takes advantage of I-5 and rail line Implementation and phasing Disadvantages: Does not build on existing terminal, access and parking facilities Requires acquisition of Teledyne-Ryan property 8

9 2001 Master Plan Concept D2 Source: HNTB, June Advantages: Provides increase in airfield capacity Takes advantage of access to I-5 and rail line Builds on existing terminal facilities Minimal disruption of operations during implementation Disadvantages: Relatively higher development costs (2 new runways and APM) Requires acquisition of MCRD property 9

10 2001 Master Plan Concept E Source: HNTB, June Advantages: Provides increase in airfield capacity with parallel runways Builds on existing terminal, access and parking facilities Implementation and phasing Disadvantages: No enhanced access (no connection to I-5 or rail line) Requires relocation of ATCT and fuel farm Requires acquisition of Teledyne-Ryan property 10

11 2001 Master Plan Concept E2 Source: HNTB, June Advantages: Provides increase in airfield capacity Takes advantage of access to I-5 and rail line Builds on existing terminal facilities Implementation and phasing Disadvantages: Relatively higher development costs (2 new runways and APM) Requires acquisition of MCRD property 11

12 2001 Master Plan Concept F Source: HNTB, June Advantages: Provides greatest increase in airfield capacity Avoids some existing Point Loma obstructions/residential areas Takes advantage of access to I-5 and rail line Disadvantages: Does not build on existing terminal, access and parking facilities Requires relocation of ATCT and fuel farm Requires closure of MCRD 12

13 2001 Master Plan Concept G (SDIA) Source: HNTB, June Connection to NAS North Island Advantages: Provides increase in airfield capacity with North Island airfield Takes advantage of access to I-5 and rail line Redirects departures and arrivals over the water Disadvantages: Requires split operation Higher development and implementation costs Acquisition of Naval property and joint use operation authorization 13

14 2001 Master Plan Concept G (NAS North Island) Connection to Lindbergh Field Source: HNTB, June Advantages: Provides increase in airfield capacity with North Island airfield Takes advantage of access to I-5 and rail line Redirects departures and arrivals over the water Disadvantages: Requires split operation Higher development and implementation costs Acquisition of Naval property and joint use operation authorization 14

15 15 ASSP Concepts

16 Lindbergh Field - Concept 1 - Rejected by Board Disadvantages Airfield capacity unmet Obstructions severely limit runway use Environmental/coastal impacts Land acquisition Community impacts Harbor Drive/traffic impacts 16

17 Lindbergh Field - Concept 2 - Rejected by Board Disadvantages Airfield capacity unmet Obstructions severely limit runway use Land acquisition Community impacts 17

18 Lindbergh Field - Concept 3 - Rejected by Board Disadvantages Airfield capacity unmet Obstructions severely limit runway use Land acquisition Community impacts 18

19 Lindbergh Field - Concept 4 - Rejected by Board Disadvantages Airfield capacity unmet Obstructions severely limit runway use Environmental/coastal impacts Land acquisition Community impacts Harbor Drive/traffic impacts 19

20 Lindbergh Field - Concept 5 - Rejected by Board Disadvantages NAS North Island airspace interaction Land acquisition Community Impacts Wind coverage Impact to shipping channel 20

21 Lindbergh Field - Concept 6 Eliminated by the Board Advantages: Meets operational demand Use of existing airside, terminal and access facilities Limited impacts to MCRD Disadvantages: Land acquisition Community disruptions Environmental impacts Payload range limitations (terrain obstructions) 21

22 Findings Concept F Operational Requirement Partially meets PAL 30 requirements Does not provide dual, independent approaches Does not provide 12,000-ft departure runway Community Disruption 135 housing units 317 residents Land Acquisition Land acquisition area of 472 acres Total site area of 1,133 acres Infrastructure Impacts MCRD Acquisition Noise Impacts 65 db CNEL impacts 26,743 people versus 19,560 in existing conditions 65 db CNEL impacts 12,194 housing units versus 9,794 in existing conditions 22

23 Findings Concept F Operational Requirement Partially meets PAL 30 requirements Does not provide dual, independent approaches Community Disruption 588 housing units 1,537 residents Land Acquisition Land acquisition area of 603 acres Total site area of 1,264 acres Infrastructure Impacts MCRD Acquisition Noise Impacts 65 db CNEL impacts 26,743 people versus 19,560 in existing conditions 65 db CNEL impacts 12,194 housing units versus 9,794 in existing conditions 23

24 Findings ASSP Concept 6 Operational Requirement Meets PAL 30 requirements Dual independent IFR approaches in east flow only Community Disruption 5,512 housing units 21,119 residents Land Acquisition Land acquisition area of 1,967 acres Total site area of 2,628 acres Infrastructure Impacts Access to Point Loma and areas west of airport Noise Impacts 65 db CNEL impacts 31,068 people versus 19,560 in existing conditions 65 db CNEL impacts 10,615 housing units versus 9,794 in existing conditions 24

25 Future Technology The Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) Initiatives The FAA s Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) Integrated Product Teams (IPT) The Agile Air Traffic System (AATS) IPT is developing the following capacity enhancement concepts: Super Density Operations Arrival/Arrival & Departure/Departure Equivalent Visual Operations Virtual Tower/Sense & Avoid 25

26 Technology Implications for Lindbergh Field Potential Application at SDIA Future potential reductions in separation criterion and improved traffic flows could: Allow for an increased peak arrivals, but it would require a decrease in departures. Conversely, as the number of departures increase, the number of arrivals will decrease. Fundamentally, technology cannot measurably increase the physical capacity of a single runway airfield. In the two-runway alternatives, new technology, when applied to dedicated arrival and departure runways, could increase throughput by approximately 10%. 26

27 Summary Comparison 2001 Master Plan - Concept F Evaluation Factor Existing Base Concept 12,000' Rwy 12,000' Rwy & New Technology ASSP Concept 6 Planning Parameters Target Activity Level (PAL 30) Payload/Range Capability ADG V Capability ADG VI Capability Aeronautical Airfield Requirements Land Area Requirements Approach Capability Wind Coverage Airspace Design Expansion Environmental Noise Community Disruption Land Acquisition Market Accessibility & Demand Military Impact Financial Affordability Legend Meets Requirement / Acceptable / Feasible Partially Meets Requirement / Somewhat Acceptable / Feasible with Issues Does Not Meet Requirement / Not Acceptable / Not Feasible 27