NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND...
|
|
- Eleanor Lang
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND METHODOLOGY Noise Background Noise Criteria Noise Attenuation Requirements PREDICTION OF OUTDOOR NOISE LEVELS Noise Sources Roadway Traffic Volumes Noise Analysis Noise Level Results Implementation CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS... 7 DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. PAGE I DSEL
3 NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Key Plan Noise Receiver Plan Acoustic Fence Plan TABLES Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Outdoor Noise Level Criteria Indoor Noise Level Criteria Noise Attenuation Requirements Traffic and Roadway Parameters Noise Analysis Results Attenuated Noise Analysis Results Required Noise Attenuation Measures APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Grading Plan STAMSON Input and Output Data PAGE II DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. DSEL
4 NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 NOISE CONTROL STUDY FOR PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 PROJECT NO.: INTRODUCTION Phoenix Homes have retained David Schaeffer Engineering Ltd. (DSEL) to prepare a Noise Control Study in support of their application for site plan control. The subject property is located within the City of Ottawa urban boundary. As depicted on Figure 1, the subject property is Northwest of Prince of Wales Drive between Blackleaf Drive and Golflinks Drive located at 3654 & 3658 Jockvale Road. The subject property measures approximately 1.07ha and is zoned DR. The proposed development by Phoenix Homes involves the construction of 7 blocks of residential townhouses consisting of 54 units. The purpose of this report is to evaluate noise attenuation measure and warning clauses required for the subject lands. 2.0 BACKGROUND Environmental Noise Control Guidelines City of Ottawa, May 10, (ENCG) LU-131 Noise Assessment In Land Use Planning Ministry of the Environment Official Plan City of Ottawa, May The above documents form the basis of this report. PAGE 1 DSEL DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD.
5 NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV METHODOLOGY 3.1 Noise Background The City of Ottawa is concerned with noise from aircraft, roads, transitways and railways as expressed in the Official Plan, since it can affect the quality of life for residents. To protect residents from unacceptable levels of noise, the City of Ottawa has specific environmental noise control guidelines, which are primarily based on Ministry of Environment (MOE) policies, guidelines and procedures aimed at providing guidance on noise assessment in land use planning. Only noise generated from road traffic is considered in this analysis. Aircraft noise is not considered in this analysis as the subject lots are situated outside of the Ottawa Airport Operation Influence Zone (AOIZ) as per Figure 1.1 in the ENCG. Transitways and railway lines are not considered in this analysis, as they are not located within 250m and 500m, respectively, of the subject lots. Theoretical noise calculations are generated using the Stamson 5.04 program, which is provided by the MOE. The noise levels are dependent on the proposed receiver location, and the path in which the noise travels from the source to reach it. Noise levels are reported in decibels (dba). 3.2 Noise Criteria The quantitative sound level criteria, which require that specific outdoor and indoor living areas of the residential development meet certain energy equivalent sound levels (Leq), are summarized in Table 1, and Table 2, respectively. Compliance with the outdoor sound level criteria will generally ensure compliance with indoor sound level criteria. The Leq is defined as the continuous sound level, which has the same energy as a time varying noise level over a selected period of time. The Leq is commonly calculated on the basis of a 16-hour daytime / 8-hour nighttime split to assess its impact. Table 1: Outdoor Noise Level Criteria Time Period Receiver Location Max Noise Level Criteria (Leq) With no Noise Mitigation Requirements Daytime (07:00 23:00) Outdoor Living Area (OLA) 55 dba Daytime Plane of Window (POW) 55 dba (07:00 23:00) Nighttime (23:00 07:00) Plane of Window (POW) at bedrooms/sleeping quarters 50 dba PAGE 2 DSEL DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD.
6 NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 The OLA is defined as the part of the outdoor amenity area provided for the quiet enjoyment of the outdoor environment during the daytime period. The amenity area for this development is considered the backyards of the subject houses. The receiver location for measuring the OLA for a residential backyard is 3.0m from the wall of the house and 1.5m above grade. Table 2: Indoor Noise Level Criteria Time Period Receiver Location Noise Level Criteria (Leq) Daytime (07:00 23:00) Residential living spaces 45 dba Nighttime (23:00 07:00) Residential sleeping quarters 40 dba 3.3 Noise Attenuation Requirements In accordance with City of Ottawa guidelines, when noise levels are predicted to be less than the specified criteria for daytime and nighttime conditions, no attenuation measures are required. As the noise criteria are exceeded, a combination of attenuation measures is recommended. These attenuation measures may include any or all of the following: Noise barrier/berm; Forced air ventilation system with provision for central air conditioning; Air conditioning; When sound levels are predicted to exceed the applicable noise level criteria, a warning clause is registered on title to alert potential homeowners/residents. The noise attenuation requirements for the outdoor living area are presented in Table 3. DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. PAGE 3 DSEL
7 NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 Table 3: City of Ottawa Noise Attenuation Requirements Daytime (07:00 23:00) NOISE LEVEL (dba) Nighttime (23:00 07:00) Un-attenuated Attenuated Un-attenuated Attenuated OUTDOOR LIVING AREA (OLA) NOISE ATTENUATION OLA < 55 None 55 < OLA < 60 Noise Clause Type A OLA > 60 OLA < 55 Noise Barrier OLA > 60 OLA > 55 Noise Clause Type B PLANE OF WINDOW (POW) POW < 55 POW < 50 None 55 < POW < < POW < 60 Forced Air Ventilation Noise Clause Type C POW > 65 POW > 60 Central Air Conditioning Noise Clause Type D 4.0 PREDICTION OF OUTDOOR NOISE LEVELS 4.1 Noise Sources The subject development is bound by Jockvale Road (south of Cambrian) to the east and is bound by the existing Stonebridge residential development. Jockvale Road is considered the only noise source for this development. 4.2 Roadway Traffic Volumes The assessment of road traffic noise impact is evaluated based on Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) for each noise source. Jockvale Road is considered an arterial road, and the AADT has been attained from Table 1.7 in the ENCG. The traffic and roadway parameters used for the sound level predictions are presented in Table 4. Table 4: Traffic and Roadway Parameters Jockvale Road Roadway Classification 4-Lane Urban Arterial - Divided Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) 35,000 veh / day Posted Speed 70 km/hr Day/Night Split (%) 92/8 Medium Trucks (%) 7 Heavy Trucks (%) 5 PAGE 4 DSEL DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD.
8 NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV Noise Analysis The STAMSON software was used to predict noise levels for the development by inputting the traffic and roadway parameters for Jockvale Road. Calculations have been performed for various receiver locations, which are depicted on Figure 2, and represent the backyard (OLA) of the subject lots. Proposed and existing grades for the receiver location and Jockvale Road were attained from the detailed grading plan prepared by DSEL, enclosed in Appendix A. STAMSON input and output data for this analysis is presented in Appendix B. 4.4 Noise Level Results Table 5 illustrates the results of the noise analysis for the Jockvale Road development. The daytime values represent modeled noise levels for the Outdoor Living Area (OLA) while the nighttime values represent modeled noise levels at the Plane of Window (POW) on the second level of the dwellings. The detailed STAMSON calculations for various receiver locations are included in Appendix B. Table 5: Noise Analysis Results Receiver Lot Source Receiver Distance Source Exposure Angles Noise Levels Leq (dba) Daytime Unmitigated Nighttime (POW) R / R / R / R / R / R / R / DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. PAGE 5 DSEL
9 NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 The lot numbers in Table 5 correspond to the lot numbers shown on Figure 2 in this report. The modeling analysis indicates that the City of Ottawa noise criteria are exceeded for the Outdoor Living Area of lots 1 through 11, as represented by receiver locations R1-R6. As such, a 2.5m high noise attenuation barrier shall be implemented 0.30m inside the property line in the location shown on Figure 3. Once the noise attenuation barrier is implemented, the daytime noise level for the OLA of these lots will be reduced, as presented in Table 6. Table 6: Attenuated Noise Analysis Results Receiver Lot Proposed Mitigation Noise Levels Unmitigated (OLA) Noise Levels Mitigated (OLA) R m noise barrier along Jockvale R m noise barrier along Jockvale R m noise barrier along Jockvale R m noise barrier along Jockvale R m noise barrier along Jockvale R m noise barrier along Jockvale It should be noted that there are existing dwellings south of the development that have been considered in the analysis to limit the exposure to Jockvale Road. However, at this current time, a noise barrier for the adjacent lots has not yet been constructed along the Jockvale Road rear property line. When the wall is constructed for the development to the south, the barrier extents should be revisited at this location. More specifically, the noise barrier shown on the development subject of this report will not require the wrap around wall, but should continue and connect to the adjacent wall by the other developer. 4.5 Implementation The attenuation measures required to satisfy the City of Ottawa noise criteria and the noise clauses that need to be included on title and in the Agreement of Purchase and Sale for the various dwelling units are summarized in Table 7. PAGE 6 DSEL DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD.
10 NOISE CONTROL STUDY PHOENIX HOMES 3654 & 3658 JOCKVALE ROAD APRIL 28, 2011 REV 1 Table 7: Required Noise Attenuation Measures Lots Attenuation Measure Notice on Title 1, 8 Noise Attenuation Barrier Central Air Conditioning B & D Noise Attenuation Barrier Forced Air Ventilation B & C Remaining Lots Nothing Required None 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS An analysis of the roadway traffic indicates that the City of Ottawa s criteria for residential noise will be exceeded, primarily for units in close proximity to Jockvale Road. The following is a summary of the attenuation measures and notice requirements to be placed on title for all units in accordance with the City of Ottawa Noise Control Guidelines listed below. Lot 1 / 8: Noise attenuation barrier as indicated on Figure 3; Central air conditioning; Notice on title: Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. DAVID SCHAEFFER ENGINEERING LTD. PAGE 7 DSEL
11
12
13
14
15 APPENDIX A Grading Plan
16
17 APPENDIX B STAMSON Input and Output Data
18 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :05:53 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 67.43! dba Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 60.32! dba
19 TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 60.32
20 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :00:58 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r1bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 2.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 3.00 / 3.00 m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.66! dba
21 Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 60.32! * dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 60.32
22 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :09:04 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 64.23! dba Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 57.17! dba
23 TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 57.17
24 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :02:39 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r2bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 2.20 m Barrier receiver distance : 8.00 / 8.00 m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.60! dba
25 Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 57.98! * dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 57.98
26 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :10:56 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 63.01! dba
27 Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.00! dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 56.00
28 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :03:30 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r3bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 2.50 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 57.71! dba
29 Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.00! * dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 56.00
30 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :11:13 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 60.58! dba
31 Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 53.69! dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 53.69
32 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :21:24 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r4bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 2.50 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00
33 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.15! dba Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 53.69! * dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 53.69
34 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :11:28 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 66.34! dba
35 Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.26! dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 59.26
36 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :22:43 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r5bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 2.50 m Barrier receiver distance : 8.00 / 8.00 m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00
37 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.73! dba Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.26! * dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 59.26
38 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :11:50 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r6.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 63.01! dba
39 Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.00! dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 56.00
40 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :25:36 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r6bar.te Description: With barrier Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier) Barrier angle1 : deg Angle2 : deg Barrier height : 2.20 m Barrier receiver distance : / m Source elevation : m Receiver elevation : m Barrier elevation : m Reference angle : 0.00
41 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 57.77! dba Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 56.00! * dba * Bright Zone! TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 56.00
42 STAMSON 5.0 SUMMARY REPORT Date: :12:06 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: r7.te Description: Unattenuated Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Road data, segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/2464 veh/timeperiod * Medium truck volume : 2254/196 veh/timeperiod * Heavy truck volume : 1610/140 veh/timeperiod * Posted speed limit : 70 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Volume : 7.00 Heavy Truck % of Volume : 5.00 Day (16 hrs) % of Volume : Data for Segment # 1: Jockvale (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 4.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Result summary (day) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 59.60! dba
43 Result summary (night) ! source! Road! 1.Jockvale! 1.50! 52.58! dba TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): 52.58
Noise Assessment Report
Noise Assessment Report 176 Greenfield Avenue Prepared for: TC United Group Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. February 8, 2016 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Introduction February 8, 2016 Table of Contents
More informationNoise Assessment Report
Noise Assessment Report 19 & 23 Bachman Terrace Prepared for: Tega Homes Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. March 24, 2014 Draft Mar 7 2014 Final Mar 24, 2014 NOISE ASSESSMENT REPORT Table of Contents
More informationNoise Assessment Report Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON
Noise Assessment Report 825-875 Main Street, Residential Site Cambridge, ON Prepared for: 2536546 Ontario Inc. Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 100-300 Hagey Boulevard Waterloo, ON N2L 0A4 Project:
More informationMerivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study
Merivale Road Residential Development 1683 Merivale Road Noise Control Study Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 Submitted:
More informationDCR Phoenix. Type of Document 1st Submission. Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario. Project Number OTT A0. Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf
DCR Phoenix Noise Impact Assessment Study Type of Document 1st Submission Project Name 256 Rideau Street Ottawa, Ontario Project Number OTT-00206641-A0 Prepared By: Nicole Ruyf Reviewed By: Alam Ansari,
More informationNOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY. MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA
NOISE CONTROL FEASIBILITY STUDY MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. Clarke Lands CITY OF OTTAWA March 2016 Prepared for: Minto Communities Inc. 200-180 Kent Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P 0B6 Prepared by: J.L. RICHARDS
More informationNOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6
RESIDENTIAL / HOTEL DEVELOPMENT 141 GEORGE STREET / 325 DALHOUSIE STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO Prepared By: NOVATECH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS LTD. Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber House 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Old Barber ouse 5155 Mississauga Road City of Mississauga, Ontario Prepared for: City Park (Old Barber) omes Inc. 950 Nashville Road Kleinburg,
More informationTraffic Noise Assessment. 333 Montreal Road. Ottawa, Ontario
Traffic Noise Assessment 333 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE17-045 - Traffic Noise Prepared For: Michaela Jones The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd Toronto, ON M4H 1P4 Prepared By: Joshua Foster,
More informationUAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD
UAL URBAN AERODYNAMICS LTD 23 Waterford Drive Telephone (613) 225-6362 Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Facsimile (613) 225-3022 K2E 7V4 e-mail standen.ual@sympatico.ca website: http://www.urban-noise.ca 1.0 Background
More informationPlace Vanier Édifice AEFO
Place Vanier Édifice AEFO Martineau Architecture Inc. + Smith Carter Architects & Engineers Inc. TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT 250 Montreal Road Gradient Microclimate Engineering Inc. Prepared by Thomas Couper,
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT STONEPAY - PICKERING WEST OF BROCK ROAD AND SOUTH OF DERSAN STREET PART OF LOTS 19 AND 20, CONCESSION 3 PLAN 40R-28764 CITY OF PICKERING PREPARED FOR: STONEPAY 7603860 CANADA
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Residential Development Brock Road Pickering, Ontario Prepared for: Madison Brock Limited 369 Rimrock Road Toronto, Ontario M3J 3G2 Prepared by: Jingyi Guo Reviewed by:
More informationSS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers
SS WILSON ASSOCIATES Consulting Engineers REPORT NO. WA10-089 DETAILED NOISE CONTROL STUDY PROPOSED 6-STOREY APARTMENT BUILDING 17, 19 & 23 ROBINSON AVENUE OTTAWA, ONTARIO SUBMITTED TO: ROBINSON PARK DEVELOPMENT
More informationAppendix K. Environmental Noise Assessment
Appendix K Environmental Noise Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT THORNTON ROAD NORTH TAUNTON ROAD WEST TO WINCHESTER ROAD WEST SCEDULE 'C' MUNICIPAL CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF OSHAWA
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAKEVIEW BOULEVARD BETWEEN POPLAR AVENUE AND MAPLE AVENUE TOWN OF AJAX PREPARED FOR: TMIG February 2017 Y1610 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Ottawa Ontario Canada ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ON THE PROPOSED AVALON CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CITY OF OTTAWA Prepared for Bryden Martel Architects Inc. Prepared by Hugh Williamson
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Framgard Apartments (South Block) NW corner of Britannia Road and Regional Road 25 Town of Milton, Ontario Prepared for: Mattamy Homes Ltd. 433 Steeles Avenue East, Suite 110 Milton,
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East
Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 92 Plains Road East Novus Reference No. 16-0006 Version No. 1.1 (Final) February 26, 2016 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Specialist: Marcus Li, P.Eng. 16/02/26
More informationAppendix M. Noise Assessment
Appendix M Noise Assessment 610 Chartwell Road, Suite 300 Oakville, ON Canada L6J 4A5 t: 905.823.8500 f: 905.823.8503 www.mmmgrouplimited.com www.wspgroup.ca MEMO RE: FROM: DATE: March 27, 2017 COPIES:
More informationDraft Noise Abatement Guidelines
Document under Separate Cover refer to IMLC01-13 Draft Noise Abatement Guidelines April 2013 Legislative & Planning Services Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...1 1.1 Key Definitions...1 2.0 Existing
More informationNoise Impact Assessment 1158 Second Line Road Ottawa, Ontario
Noise Impact Assessment 1158 Second Line Road Ottawa, Ontario Type of Document: Site Plan Submission Client: Theberge Homes Project Number: OTT-00245003-A0 Prepared By: M. Ghadban, EIT. Reviewed By: B.
More informationNoise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study 2480 Old Bronte Road, Oakville, Ontario Prepared for: New Horizon Development Group (Bronte) Inc. 69 John Street South, Suite 400 Hamilton, Ontario L8N 2B9 Prepared by Sheeba Paul,
More informationPolicy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads
Lanark County Policy for the Assessment and Mitigation of Traffic Noise on County Roads d r a f t f o r d i s c u s s i o n Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. 302 1150 Morrison Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-storey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Milton, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed 6-srey Seniors Condominium 7480 Derry Road West Miln, Ontario Prepared for: FGL Derry Inc. 5400 Yonge Street, Suite 300 Toron, Ontario M2N 5R5 Prepared by Vicr Garcia,
More informationRoad and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario
Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario Prepared for: Attn: Nancy Shoemaker Black, Shoemaker, Robinson & Donaldson Limited 351 Speedvale Ave. West Guelph,
More informationRoad and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario
Road and Rail and Vibration Noise Impact Study Valeriote Subdivision, Guelph, Ontario For Attn: Nancy Shoemaker Black, Shoemaker, Robinson & Donaldson Limited 351 Speedvale Ave. West Guelph, Ontario N1H
More informationNoise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario
Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study 1 and 15 Stevenson St & 8 William St Guelph, Ontario Prepared for: Jennark Homes 66 Wellington Road 7, Unit #1 Elora, Ontario N0B 1S0 Prepared by Rajjot Arora, BASc
More informationEnvironmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON
Environmental Noise Feasibility Assessment Proposed Guelph Woods Development Guelph, ON Novus Reference No. 12-0292C DRAFT (v2.2) February 7, 2014 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Specialist: Marcus Li, B.Sc., B.Eng.Sc.
More informationSection O Noise Criteria
01 INTRODUCTION Noise is recognized as an environmental impact and a type of pollution that can negatively affect public health and a community s quality of life. It can impact property values, disrupt
More informationAPPENDIX 'G' Noise Attenuation Analysis
Our File: 6552 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT ADDENDUM APPENDIX 'G' Noise Attenuation Analysis March 2008 McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500
More informationStationary Noise Assessment. Orléans Gardens. Ottawa, Ontario
Stationary Noise Assessment Orléans Gardens Ottawa, Ontario REPORT: GWE15-053 Stationary Noise Prepared For: Prepared By: Michael Lafortune, Environmental Technologist Joshua Foster, P.Eng., Associate
More informationENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary
ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE CONTROL GUIDELINES: Introduction and Glossary January 2016 Visit us: Ottawa.ca/planning Contents Introduction 1 Implementation and Interpretation 1 Structure of the Environmental Noise
More informationThe content of this supplement is based upon the that described in our letter of May 28, 2012.
September 20, 2012 30 Wertheim Court, Unit 25 Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada L4B 1B9 email solutions@valcoustics.com web www.valcoustics.com telephone 905 764-5223 fax 905 764-6813 Davis Howe Partners
More informationTraffic Noise Presentation
Traffic Noise Presentation 1.- Basic Noise Concepts 2.- The Nature and Measurement of Traffic Noise 3.- Measurement Definition and Noise Units 4.- Acceptable Noise Levels 5.- Variables that Contribute
More informationNOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO
NOISE AND VIBRATION FEASIBILITY STUDY 316 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO, ONTARIO Prepared for: State Building Group Attn.: John Guanti 27 Dufferin Street, Unit 34 Toronto, Ontario M6B 4J3 Prepared
More informationRail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario
Rail Traffic Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study Proposed Zone Change for 6 Residential Lots Inkerman Street Guelph, Ontario For Granite Holdings Ontario Limited 160 Southgate Drive Guelph, Ontario N1G
More informationTraffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement
Traffic Noise Introduction to Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement NW Bethany Blvd Improvement Project Michael Minor, President Michael Minor & Associates Inc. Introduction to Acoustics What is Noise?
More informationCITY OF AIRDRIE. Transportation Noise Policy
Page 1 of6 CITY OF AIRDRIE Transportation Noise Policy Effective Date: Approved By: May 7. 2001 City Council Approved On: May 7, 2001 Resolution #: 2001-C-192 Revision Date: July 4. 2016 Resolution #:
More informationBRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS
BRITISH COLUMBIA MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE POLICY FOR ASSESSING AND MITIGATING NOISE IMPACTS FROM NEW AND UPGRADED NUMBERED HIGHWAYS April, 2014 Prepared for; B.C. Ministry of Transportation
More informationFor The Regional Municipality of Waterloo 150 Frederick Street, 8 th Floor Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 4J3. Prepared by. Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng
Noise and Vibration Compatibility Feasibility Assessment Residential Component Proposed RMOW Transit Hub King Street West and Victoria Street North, Kitchener, ON For The Regional Municipality of Waterloo
More informationASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE
ASSESSMENT OF INWARD TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT AT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, WONDERFUL BARN, LEIXLIP, CO. KILDARE Technical Report Prepared For Ardstone Capital Ltd. 48 Fitzwilliam Square Dublin Technical Report
More informationEnvironmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 939 Eglinton Avenue Development
Environmental Noise Assessment Feasibility Assessment 939 Eglinton Avenue Development Novus Reference No. 12-0253 Version No. 1.1 (DRAFT) May 1, 2015 NOVUS PROJECT TEAM: Scientist: Specialist: Project
More informationAPPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS
APPENDIX H COMPARISON OF FUTURE NOISE BARRIER OPTIONS July 27, 2010 Robert Hunton McCormick Rankin Corporation 1145 Hunt Club Road, Suite 300 Ottawa, Ontario K1V 0Y3 FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY Mr. Hunton,
More informationFIGURE N-1 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT NEAR TRANSPORTATION NOISE SOURCES
NOISE ELEMENT OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Noise Standards N1. To protect the citizens of Arroyo Grande from the harmful and annoying effects of exposure to excessive noise. Policy N1-1 The noise standards
More information2.2. The intent of the Surface Transportation Noise Policy is to provide the following: The responsibility for providing noise attenuation.
Council Policy Policy Title: Policy Number: Report Number: Adopted by/date: Council / 2017 July 31 Effective Date: 2017 July 31 Surface Transportation Noise Policy TP003 TT2017-0512 Last Amended: 2000
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development 3385 Dundas Street West City of Toronto, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Mixed-Use Development 8 Dundas Street West City of Toronto, Ontario Prepared for: Terra Firma Homes Corp High Park Ave, Suite Toronto, Ontario M6P S7 Prepared by Rajjot
More informationMINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION. Environmental Guide for Noise
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Version: October 2006 MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION Part of the Environmental Standards and Practices ISSUED BY: PROVINCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING OFFICE MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION
More informationChapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND
Chapter 21. Noise BACKGROUND The major noise sources in the Planning Area are: roadway noise from traffic on Interstate 80, Highway 113 and arterial streets; railroad noise from the Union Pacific and California
More informationConstructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook
Portland, Oregon NOISE-CON 2011 2011 July 25-27 Constructing SoundPLAN Models for Noise Studies That Are Consistent With the HUD Noise Guidebook Joshua D Leasure JEAcoustics 1705 W Koenig Lane Austin,
More informationSection 1 OBC FADS /13 Access to Parking Areas
Section 1 OBC 3.8.2.2 4.3.12/13 Access to Parking Areas A barrier-free path of travel is provided from: a) the entrance to the exterior parking area b) at least one parking level where a passenger elevator
More informationInstallation of a noise wall on Provincial land on the east side of Deerfoot Trail SE south of Highway 22X.
Chinook Roads Partnership Suite 100, 3131-114 Avenue SE Calgary, Alberta T2Z 3X2 March 5, 2012 Dear Home Owner(s), Re: Installation of a noise wall on Provincial land on the east side of Deerfoot Trail
More informationDraft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy
Draft Dulles Toll Road Highway Noise Policy 1. Purpose The Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (the Authority) strives to be a good neighbor to adjacent communities and endeavors to address traffic
More informationNoise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario
Noise Feasibility Study Commercial Building, 65 Denzil Doyle Court Ottawa, Ontario Prepared for: 8214221 Canada Inc. c/o LRL Associates Ltd. 1-2884 Chamerland Street Rockland, Ontario K4K 1M6 Prepared
More informationStantec. Allenby Court Extension, Waterloo Noise Impact Assessment. Prepared for: BU Holdings Inc Ontario Limited Waterloo ON.
Allenby Court Extension, Waterloo Noise Impact Assessment Stantec Prepared for: BU Holdings Inc. 907248 Ontario Limited Waterloo ON Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 49 Frederick Street Kitchener ON
More informationAttachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520
Attachment E2 Noise Technical Memorandum SR 520 Prepared for: Prepared by: Jodi Ketelsen Michael A. Minor Date: November 4, 2012 Subject: Project: Noise Modeling Results: NE 51st Street to NE 65th Street
More informationUS 53 Noise Mitigation
US 53 Noise Mitigation 1 Meeting Agenda Introductions Brief Project Overview Terminology Agencies Involved Rules/Regulations Noise Characteristics Project Approach Mitigation Possible Noise Mitigation
More informationGisborne District Council
11.0 NOISE AND VIBRATION... 1 11.1 STRUCTURE OF THIS CHAPTER... 1 11.2 INTRODUCTION... 1 11.3 ISSUES... 2 11.4 OBJECTIVES (NOISE INCLUDING VIBRATION)... 2 11.5 POLICIES (NOISE INCLUDING VIBRATION)... 2
More informationSECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES
SECTION 7: INDUSTRIAL ZONE RULES 7.1 CATEGORIES OF ACTIVITIES 7.1.1 PERMITTED ACTIVITIES The following activities are permitted activities in the Industrial Zone, provided activities comply with all relevant
More informationAppendix D Environmental Noise Assessment
Appendix D Environmental Noise Assessment AREAS 3 AND 4 SPECIFIC PLAN EIR NOISE AND VIBRATION ASSESSMENT NEWARK, CALIFORNIA January 30, 2009 Prepared for: Julie Mier David J. Powers and Associates, Inc.
More informationAssessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase
Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment - Draft Assessment - Draft Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 33-37 ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 33-37 ROL Phase
More informationNoise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation excavation
PROCEEDINGS of the 22 nd International Congress on Acoustics Challenges and Solutions in Acoustical Measurement and Design: Paper ICA2016-552 Noise measurement and mitigation for urban building foundation
More informationBAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA
Charles M Salter Associates Inc BAY MEADOWS PHASE II SPAR 2 SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Kim Havens Wilson Meany Sullivan Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3330
More informationWhy does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project? What is an impacted location?
Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? Noise barriers generally prove to be quite effective in providing noise reduction at receptors near transportation facilities. In 1972, the U.S. Congress passed legislation
More informationAssessment. Assessment. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages ROL Phase
Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment Assessment Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 15-19 ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 15-19 ROL Phase A038_790400_02
More informationNOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING FOR BLUEWATER RIVER CROSSING REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300-675 Cochrane Drive West Tower Markham ON L3R 0B8 Tel: (905) 944-7777 Fax: (905) 474-9889 August 9, 2012 File: 160960699 NOISE IMPACT STUDY - HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING
More informationPROPOSED CHILDCARE 11 CRYERS ROAD, HIGHBROOK ASSESSMENT OF NOISE
1/355 Manukau Road Epsom, Auckland 1023 PO Box 26283 Epsom, Auckland 1344 T: 09 638 8414 E: hegley@acoustics.co.nz PROPOSED CHILDCARE 11 CRYERS ROAD, HIGHBROOK ASSESSMENT OF NOISE Report No 16295 Prepared
More information3.1 Noise Overlay District
3.1 A. Purpose The purpose of this District is to establish a Noise Overlay Zoning District within the. B. Special Definitions As used in this Article only, the following terms shall be defined as set
More informationAcoustic Consulting Australia PtyLtd. I Consultants on Noise and Vibration P0 Box 332
Pg 'P. Acoustic Consulting Australia PtyLtd. I Consultants on Noise and Vibration P0 Box 332 Heidelberg i#i..wr. David, u.,0 Victoria 3054 Phone 0412 375 234 Email: acausteblgpond.corn ABN 49 095 932 092
More informationNoise Analysis Study along I Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT
Noise Analysis Study along I - 29 Tim Bjorneberg Project Development Program Manager SDDOT Meeting Format Very informal Meeting is not recorded General questions after presentations Specific questions
More informationAPPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT
APPENDIX C NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT Noise Study Technical Report Watertown South Connector US 81 to 29 th Street SE Watertown, South Dakota HDR Project No. 39319 Prepared by 6300 So. Old Village Place
More informationCompatible Use Odour, Dust, and Noise Assessment
Compatible Use Odour, Dust, and Noise Assessment Northridge Property Management Inc. 1101 2nd Avenue East, Suite 200 P.O. Box 325, Owen Sound, Ontario, N4K 5P5 3195 East Bayshore Road, Owen Sound, Ontario
More informationRural-Residential Rural-Residential Explanatory Statement Significant Issues Objectives and Policies...
Section Contents Rural-Residential... 2 16. Rural-Residential... 2 Explanatory Statement... 2 16.1 Significant Issues... 2 16.2 Objectives and Policies... 3 16.3 Activity Lists... 3 16.4 Activity Performance
More informationDulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy. February 2, 2011
Dulles Toll Road Highway Traffic Noise Policy February 2, 2011 as revised February 1, 2012 Table of Contents 1. Purpose... 1 2. Definitions... 1 3. Applicability... 5 4. Sound Fundamentals... 6 5. Highway
More informationNoise Study Bristol Park Redevelopment Area
Noise Study Bristol Park Redevelopment Area Distribution No. of Copies Sent To 3 Ms. Susan K. Jones Environmental Coordinator City of Champaign 102 N. Neil Street Champaign, IL 61820 X:\CH\IE\2013\13C018.00\10000
More informationLot 12 Honeywood Ave, Wandi Traffic Noise Assessment Report
Lot 12 Honeywood Ave, Wandi Traffic Noise Assessment Report Wandi Developments Pty Ltd c/- Terranovis 11 February 2014 Revision No. 1 Prepared by Andreas Lejholm Project Number: 25264-PER-N Ground Floor,
More informationMCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT
BKL CONSULTANTS LTD acoustics noise vibration MCKENZIE INTERCHANGE PROJECT PREPARED FOR: MAY 2016 REVISION 1 NOTICE BKL Consultants Ltd. (BKL) has prepared this report for the sole and exclusive benefit
More information24 CFR Part 51 Noise Abatement and Control as part of a Part 58 HUD Environmental Review. November 19, 2013
24 CFR Part 51 Noise Abatement and Control as part of a Part 58 HUD Environmental Review November 19, 2013 1 Noise Control HUD Noise Standards Noise Evaluation Process Conducting a Noise Analysis Responsibilities
More informationBuffer distances for surface roads and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise
Buffer distances for surface s and elevated highways correlated with pre-existing ambient noise Jiping ZHANG 1 ;MarcBURET 2 ; Shuoxian WU 3 ;Yuezhe ZHAO 3 ; Saiyan SHEN 1 ;Xin ZHANG 1 1 Zhejiang Research
More informationAssessment - Draft. Assessment - Draft. Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase
Road Traffic Traffic Noise Noise Impact Impact Assessment - Draft Assessment - Draft Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase Ripley Valley Amex SUCE Development Stages 42A ROL Phase A038_790147
More informationNOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES
NOISE GOALS / POLICIES GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES Authority The Government Code (Section 65302(f)) (GC) requires the preparation and adoption of "a Noise Element which shall identify and appraise noise
More informationNOISE GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES
NOISE GOALS / POLICIES GOALS / POLICIES / MEASURES Authority The Government Code (Section 65302(f)) (GC) requires the preparation and adoption of "a Noise Element which shall identify and appraise noise
More informationCOMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT
COMPONENTS OF THE NOISE ELEMENT Definitions Following is a list of commonly used terms and abbreviations that may be found within this element or when discussing the topic of noise. This is an abbreviated
More information4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION
4.13 NOISE AND VIBRATION 4.13.1 INTRODUCTION This section describes and analyzes the current noise environment in the areas where project facilities will be located, and evaluates the potential impacts
More informationSUBURBAN COMMERCIAL ZONE - RULES
Suburban Commercial Zone Chapter 18 SUBURBAN COMMERCIAL ZONE - RULES INTRODUCTION This chapter contains rules managing land uses that take place within the suburban shopping centres of the City. This includes
More informationPeak noise levels during any time period can be characterized with statistical terms.
3.11 NOISE Introduction This Noise section provides a discussion of applicable noise policies and standards, the results of ambient noise measurements, an evaluation of the projects compatibility with
More informationPOLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NOISE BARRIERS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS
POLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NOISE BARRIERS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS I. Introduction Effective Date: October 31, 2006 The New Jersey Turnpike Authority (the Authority ) has reviewed and reexamined its current
More informationNoise Control Case Studies TIM WIENS CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES
Noise Control Case Studies TIM WIENS CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES A bit about your speaker Presentation Overview 1. Some Case Studies 2. Mystery 3. Drama 4. Danger Environmental Noise Impact an Overview
More informationRailway noise mitigation factsheet 05: Cuttings and earth berms
Railway noise mitigation factsheet 05: Cuttings and earth berms 1.1 Overview In certain locations, the best option for the mitigation of railway noise may be to place the railway line low relative to the
More informationWhy does MnDOT build noise barriers? What is a Type I project?
Why does MnDOT build noise barriers? Noise barriers generally prove to be quite effective in providing noise reduction at receptors near transportation facilities. In 1972, the U.S. Congress passed legislation
More informationChapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT
Chapter 4 NOISE ELEMENT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Authority The purpose of the noise element is to limit the exposure of the community to excessive noise levels. 1 The 2003 Noise Element Guidelines requires
More informationCREATE. Noise and Vibration Assessment Methodology
CREATE Noise and Assessment Methodology June 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 1 2. BACKGROUND... 1 3. OVERALL FTA IMPACT ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY... 2 4. KEY ELEMENTS OF NOISE ASSESSMENT... 4 4.1
More informationCommunity and Environmental Noise Measurement
Community and Environmental Noise Measurement How it differs from Occupation Noise Sampling Lee Hager, COHC, 3M PSD 1 Today s Instructor Lee Hager Past lhager@mmm.com 517-290-1907 Chair AIHA Noise Committee
More informationNoise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts
Noise Assessments for Construction Noise Impacts Weixiong Wu a AKRF, Inc., 440 Park Avenue, 7th floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA. ABSTRACT Construction noise is one of the most disruptive noise sources
More information442 CHELTENHAM ROAD KEYSBOROUGH. Noise Control Considerations. Prepared for Bridport Property Group Level 1, 170 Bridport Street, Albert Park VIC 3206
442 CHELTENHAM ROAD KEYSBOROUGH Noise Control Considerations Prepared for Bridport Property Group Level 1, 170 Bridport Street, Albert Park VIC 3206 Ref. 11649-1ng.docx 22 December 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationSUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL. QLDC PROPOSED DISTRICT PLAN [PART THREE] DECISIONS VERSION 7 lower density SUBURBAN residential
7 LOWER DENSITY SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL 7.1 Zone Purpose The Lower Density Suburban Residential Zone is the largest residential zone in the District. The District Plan includes such zoning that is within
More informationSan Joaquin Apartments and Precinct Improvements Project EIR Noise
5.7 NOISE This section evaluates the potential for the San Joaquin Apartments project to result in significant short- and long-term noise impacts. The evaluation includes an assessment of potential construction-related
More informationAssessment of Traffic Noise Effects
Technical Report 15 Assessment of Traffic Noise Effects Revision History Revision Nº Prepared By Description Date - A Version 1 Version 2 Siirii Wilkening ( Marshall Day Acoustics) Siirii Wilkening ( Marshall
More informationAPPENDIX 7 - AIRPORT NOISE AND DE VE LOPMENT CONTROL
JUNE 2 016 A7.1 APPENDIX 7 AIRPORT NOISE AND DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS A7.1 INTRODUCTION The Rotorua Airport is an important resource for the Rotorua district and wider Bay of Plenty, East Coast and Central
More informationAPPENDIX C. Environmental Noise Assessment
APPENDIX C Environmental Noise Assessment This page intentionally left blank. Environmental Noise Assessment San Joaquin Valley Christian School Merced County, California BAC Job # 2015-085 Prepared For:
More information