Updated Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Updated Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program"

Transcription

1 Updated TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program i

2 Memphis MPO Contact Information: 125 North Main St., Suite # 450 Memphis, TN Ph. (901) Fax. (901) This document is available in accessible formats when requested ten (10) days in advance. This document was prepared and published by the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and is prepared in cooperation with financial assistance from all or several of the following public entities: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT), the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT), and local governments in in the Metropolitan Planning Area. This financial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the funding agencies. It is the policy of the Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization not to discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, color, national origin or disability in its hiring or employment practices, or in its admission to or operations of its program, services, or activities. All inquiries for Title VI and/or the American Disabilities Act, contact Mitchell Lloyd at or Mitchell.Lloyd@memphistn.gov.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix A Construction Set-Aside List. 1 Appendix B FY TIP Policy and Memorandum of Agreement for TIP Amendment/Adjustment Procedures Appendix C Funding Provisions in the FAST Act and Additional Notes Appendix D Project Ranking Criteria and Supporting Documents 28 Appendix E Status of Projects in FY TIP Appendix F Public Involvement Process Appendix G FY TIP Local STBG Projects and Rankings Appendix H Statewide Grouping Descriptions TDOT TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program i

4 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX-A Construction Set-Aside Project List Table A-1: Local Tennessee Fiscally Constrained Construction Set-Aside Projects Tennessee Fiscally Constrained Construction Set-Aside Projects Project Name Agency FY Federal Funds Airline Road North Widening Arlington 2018 $3,412,800 Hwy 70 at Jetway Road Improvements Arlington 2018 $1,054,400 Old Brownsville Road Bartlett 2018 $18,400,000 Germantown Road at Wolf River Blvd Intersection Germantown 2018 $1,400,000 Elvis Presley Blvd Memphis 2017 $3,160,000 Holmes Road East Memphis 2017 $5,034,000 Homes Road West Memphis 2017 $10,397,280 Total $42,858,480 Table A-2: Local Mississippi Fiscally Constrained Construction Set-Aside Projects Mississippi Fiscally Constrained Construction Set-Aside Projects Project Name Agency FY Federal Funds Pleasant Hill Road Widening Olive Branch 2019 $5,148,000 Total $5,148,000 Table A-3: Local Tennessee Illustrative Project List for Construction Set-Aside Tennessee Illustrative Project List for Construction Set-Aside Project Name Agency Federal Funds Donelson Farms Parkway Arlington $3,183,200 Kirby/ Whitten Parkway (Shelby Farms Parkway) Memphis $12,000,000 Plough Blvd Memphis $28,000,000 Union Avenue Complete Street Memphis $10,560,000 Forest Hill Irene Memphis $12,584,937 Walnut Grove Road East Memphis $7,161,876 Navy Road Streetscape Phase II Millington $1,520,000 Raleigh Millington Road at 385 Intersection Improvements Millington $459,200 Walnut Grove Road Widening Shelby County $8,587,500 Hacks Cross Road Improvements Shelby County $14,400,000 Total $98,456,713 Table A-4: Local Tennessee Illustrative Project List for Construction Set-Aside Mississippi Illustrative Project List for Construction Set-Aside Project Name Agency Federal Funds Commerce Street Extension DeSoto County $2,446,400 McIngvale Widening and Realignment Hernando $7,152,000 Total $9,598,400 * If a project on the illustrative list project list meets the conditions outlined in the FY TIP policy showing readiness to go to construction, then an amendment could be made to replace a project on the construction set-aside list. 1 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

5 APPENDIX-B FY Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Policy 1. Minimum Eligibility Requirements At a minimum, projects submitted to the Memphis MPO must be in the Memphis Urban Area s Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and can include projects eligible for Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) funding that supports the goals and objectives of the RTP. Additionally, the lead agency must work through their internal process to secure the 20% matching funds needed. 2. Commitment to Implement Project and Project Delays The submission and approval of a request using STBG funds shall constitute a commitment to complete the project in a timely manner as described in the application form by the project s lead agency. Any part of the project scope credited in awarding evaluation points becomes a permanent part of the project scope and must be implemented. To ensure that all allocated funds made available to the Memphis MPO are used, all lead agencies with funding requests will work with appropriate DOTs and the Memphis MPO to ensure that all State and federal requirements are met, and that the project follows the programming schedule in the TIP. The Memphis MPO will program STBG funds for any transportation projects over a 4 year period within the TIP. Each phase of a project should be obligated by the end of the federal fiscal year (September 30) designated in the TIP. A delay is defined as a situation where a project s federal funding is not obligated in the fiscal year identified in the TIP. After the first delay, the MPO staff will report to the Engineering and Technical Committee (ETC) and the Transportation Policy Board (TPB), the projects using programmed STBG funds, that have not received obligation and the reason for the delay. A second delay will occur 8 weeks prior to the MPO s 2nd Quarter ETC meeting. At this time MPO Staff will begin the amendment process to remove the subsequent phases from the TIP at the 2nd Quarter ETC and TPB meeting s (see example below). After the second delay only the first phase of work will remain in the TIP and all other phases will be removed from the TIP. Project delays will be reviewed to determine if it is a result of the project approval process through the State DOTs and special consideration will be given in such cases. Project delays will be considered as part of the development of future TIP cycles and points will be awarded to projects that have received timely obligation. For projects that have only one phase identified in the TIP, the second delay will be documented and taken into consideration when programming funds for future TIP cycles. Projects using Transportation Alternatives (TA) funds will also be tracked and any project delays will be reported to the ETC and TPB. For Tennessee projects, the obligation deadline for TA funds is July 1st, approximately 2 years and 9 months after the last day of the fiscal year for which the funds were authorized. The lead agency is required to contact the MPO staff, a minimum of 6 months prior to the potential expiration date of any TA funds for a project. The MPO staff, at this time, will determine if there is another project in the TIP that is both ready for obligation and meets the eligibility criteria for the TA funds. In this case the funding source for the projects, if agreed upon by MPO staff, TDOT, and the lead agencies, could be swapped. For Mississippi projects, obligation of TA funds will be tracked as part of the regularly scheduled TIP project status meetings. For both Tennessee and Mississippi, the lead agency should keep the MPO staff informed of any delays in the obligation of TA funds. Please be aware if any project does not get started in a 10 year time period, then the lead agency will be responsible for reimbursing the federal funds as required under Section 102(b) of Title 23, United States Code (U.S.C.). The Memphis MPO staff will track projects quarterly and record the funds that are obligated on the project TIP pages. Example: A project is included in the FY TIP with funding designated for PE-D for FY 2017 and ROW for FY If the funds for the PE-D phase are not obligated by September 30, 2017 then the project will receive its first delay and MPO staff will report to the ETC and TPB the reason for the delay. If the funds for PE-D are not obligated, eight weeks prior to the MPO s 2nd Quarter ETC meeting, then the PE -D phase would stay in the TIP but the future phase for ROW would be removed and the funds would be returned to the MPO s total available balance. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 2

6 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D 3. Carryover Projects Projects carried over to future TIPs must be re-submitted for inclusion. Carry-over projects will be given priority within the project application and ranking process if the project has shown timely obligation of the phases included within the previous TIP. 4. Overmatching Funds Projects seeking additional points by providing more than the required 20% match will be required to provide documentation, such as a signed letter from the Mayor, CIP page, or resolution from local legislative board. The federal percentage and the corresponding funds for the project will be changed to reflect the overmatching provided by the applicant. 5. Cost Increases / Cost Over-runs In cases where a project, that is awarded MPO-managed federal grant funds, does not have sufficient funding to fulfill the scope of the project as originally programmed, the project sponsor may be granted the flexibility to shift funding across phases and/or years (pending the availability of funding) to cover increased cost estimates for the affected phases. At the discretion of the MPO staff, STBG funds if available may be designated to cover the cost over-run of a project and the MPO s ETC and TPB will be notified. Contractual agreements between the State DOTs and the project sponsor do not bind the MPO to pay for cost over-runs with MPO managed federal grant funds. 6. Construction Set-Aside To facilitate the timely delivery of projects and to prevent the lapse of obligation authority provided by Congress to the State and MPO, the construction phase of road projects using STBG funds will not be formally programmed until the project is far enough along in the right-ofway (ROW) phase to more accurately estimate the construction costs while maintaining the targeted timeline for construction. The Construction Set-Aside is a fiscally constrained project list included in the TIP with STBG funds for construction. In order to access the funds for a project on the Construction Set-Aside list, the lead agency will submit a preliminary cost estimate to the MPO staff requesting the funds be programmed to the project and therefore initiating the TIP amendment process. At this time, documentation such as a signed letter from the Mayor, CIP page, or resolution from the local legislative board, will be required to confirm matching funds. The preliminary cost estimate will be submitted, during the ROW phase, approximately six (6) months from when the project will go to bid for construction. Construction funding will be programmed on projects from the Construction Set-Aside list on a first-come, first-serve basis. Should the preliminary cost estimate submitted during the ROW phase exceed the original estimate, the lead agency must find an alternative source of revenue or make a special request to the Engineering and Technical Committee (ETC) and the Transportation Policy Board (TPB) for additional funding if available. The MPO meeting calendar provides the opportunity for TIP amendments on a quarterly basis so it is important to keep the MPO staff updated on the project status to ensure that adequate time is given to program construction funds to the project. The lead agency will have twelve (12) months to obligate the construction funds once the TIP amendment request has been made to the MPO to add construction funds for the project. Any delay in obligation, past the twelve (12) month period, will be reviewed to determine the reason for delay, before the funds are returned to the Construction Set-Aside. Special consideration will be given in the cases where the delay is a result of the project approval process through the State DOTs. An illustrative project list for construction, which is not fiscally constrained, will also be included in the TIP. If a project on the illustrative project list meets the conditions outlined under this section, showing readiness to go to construction, then an amendment could be made to replace a project on the Construction Set-Aside list with the one on the illustrative list that is ready to go to construction. Before construction funds can be obligated, the TIP must be amended to add the funds to the project. The TIP amendment approval process takes approximately four (4) months to complete and is done on a quarterly basis, therefore keeping the MPO staff updated on the project status is key to ensuring that the construction funds are programmed in a timely manner. Please see the following page for additional information on the Construction Set-Aside approach. If you have questions, please contact the Memphis MPO office at Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

7 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

8 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

9 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

10 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

11 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

12 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 9 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

13 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

14 TABLE OF CONTENTS Memorandum of Agreement for TIP Amendments & Adjustments* The following Memorandum of Agreement describes procedures used by the Memphis MPO to process amendments and adjustments to projects in the TIP and STIP for projects in Tennessee, based on terms agreed to by the Memphis MPO and the Tennessee Department of Transportation. APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A 11 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

15 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 12 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

16 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 13 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

17 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 14 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

18 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 15 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

19 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

20 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 17 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

21 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

22 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 19 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

23 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

24 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 21 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

25 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

26 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Appendix C Funding Provisions in the FAST Act On December 4, 2015, President Obama signed into law Public Law , the Fixing America s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act). The FAST Act funds surface transportation programs including, but not limited to, Federal-aid highways at over $305 billion for fiscal years (FY) 2016 through It is the first long-term surface transportation authorization enacted in a decade that provides long-term funding certainty for surface transportation. This summary reviews the policies and programs of the FAST Act administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), enacted in 2012, included provisions to make the Federal surface transportation more streamlined, performance-based, and multimodal, and to address challenges facing the U.S. transportation system, including improving safety, maintaining infrastructure condition, reducing traffic congestion, improving efficiency of the system and freight movement, protecting the environment, and reducing delays in project delivery. The FAST Act builds on the changes made by MAP-21. Setting the course for transportation investment in highways, the FAST Act Improves mobility on America s highways The FAST Act establishes and funds new programs to support critical transportation projects to ease congestion and facilitate the movement of freight on the Interstate System and other major roads. Examples include developing a new National Multimodal Freight Policy, apportioning funding through a new National Highway Freight Program, and authorizing a new discretionary grant program for Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (FASTLANE Grants). Creates jobs and supports economic growth The FAST Act authorizes $226.3 billion in Federal funding for FY 2016 through 2020 for road, bridge, bicycling, and walking improvements. In addition, the FAST Act includes a number of provisions designed to improve freight movement in support of national goals. Accelerates project delivery and promotes innovation Building on the reforms of MAP-21 and FHWA s Every Day Counts initiative, the FAST Act incorporates changes aimed at ensuring the timely delivery of transportation projects. These changes will improve innovation and efficiency in the development of projects, through the planning and environmental review process, to project delivery.. Following are brief descriptions of many of the FAST Act highway provisions. The applicable section of the Act is noted in brackets. INVESTMENT Authorizations [1101] The FAST Act authorizes $226.3 billion in budget authority for Federal-aid highway programs over five years (FY 2016 through FY 2020). This includes $225.2 billion in contract authority, starting at $43.1 billion for FY 2016 and growing about two percent each year to $47.1 billion in FY The Act also authorizes another $1.1 billion (over the five years) that is subject to appropriation. Administrative Expenses [1104] The FAST Act provides a separate authorization of $453 million for FY 2016, increasing about two percent each year to $480.8 million for FY 2020, for FHWA administrative expenses associated with the Federal-aid highway program and Appalachian Regional Commission administration of the Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS). Of this amount, $24 million is designated for other purposes each year, as follows: On-the-job training supportive services ($10 million annually) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) supportive services ($10 million annually) Highway use tax evasion projects ($4 million annually) [1110] Obligation Limitation [1102] The FAST Act establishes an obligation limitation of $ billion for FY 2016, increasing each fiscal year up to $ billion for FY 2020, for the purpose of limiting annual highway spending. Distribution of the limitation under the FAST Act is similar to under MAP-21. The Act also continues the requirement to annually recover unused obligation limitation and distribute it as formula limitation to States that can use it before the end of the fiscal year. Funding for the following programs is exempt from the limitation: Emergency Relief (ER) Demonstration projects from the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and earlier authorization acts (specified) Minimum Allocation (prior to the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21)) $639 million per year of TEA-21 Minimum Guarantee $639 million per year of Equity Bonus under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient 23 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

27 Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) and its extension acts $639 million per year of National Highway Performance Program funds (MAP-21 and FAST Act) Formulas [1104] The FAST Act maintains the majority of MAP-21 s process for apportioning Federal-aid highway funds but makes a few modifications. The apportionment process under the FAST Act is as follows: Step one: Authorize lump sum for apportioned programs. As under MAP-21, the FAST Act authorizes a single amount for each year for all the apportioned highway programs combined. This includes the National Highway Performance Program (NHPP), the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG, formerly Surface Transportation Program), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) (including Railway-Highway Crossings), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ), and Metropolitan Planning, plus a new National Highway Freight Program (NHFP). Step two: Reserve funds for supplemental NHPP and STBG. Of the lump sum apportionment, the FAST Act reserves specified supplemental amounts for NHPP (only in FY 2019 and FY 2020) and STBG (each of FY ). The remainder is referred to as the base apportionment. Step three: Calculate each State s share of each of these categories. FHWA calculates an initial amount for each State for each of these three categories (base apportionment, plus supplemental NHPP and supplemental STBG, as appropriate). The calculation is based on the State s share of apportionments in FY Step four: Adjust initial amounts if necessary to ensure 95 cents on the dollar. As necessary, FHWA adjusts each State s initial amounts to ensure that no State receives cumulatively across the three categories less than 95 cents of every dollar it contributed to the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund (HTF). Step five: For each State, divide these amounts among apportioned programs. FHWA then divides the State s base apportionment plus any supplemental NHPP and/or STBG funds between the various apportioned programs, based on procedures specified in statute. To enhance flexibility, a State may transfer up to 50 percent of any apportionment to another formula program. However, no transfers are permitted of Metropolitan Planning funds, funds suballocated to areas based on population (under either STBG or Transportation Alternatives), or funds set aside for the Recreational Trails Program. TIFIA [2001] The Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act (TIFIA) program provides Federal credit assistance to eligible surface transportation projects. The FAST Act reduces TIFIA funding as compared to MAP-21 levels, authorizing approximately $1.44 billion over five years starting with $275 million in FY 2016 to pay the subsidy cost (similar to a commercial bank s loan reserve requirement) of supporting Federal credit. The FAST Act also calls for a number of program reforms, including: new eligibilities for public infrastructure associated with transit-oriented development, a tighter definition of rural projects, the elimination of the MAP-21 requirement to redistribute uncommitted TIFIA funds, and authority for States to use NHPP and STBG funds to support subsidy and administrative costs of TIFIA credit assistance for projects eligible under those programs. Tolling and High-Occupancy Vehicles [1411] The FAST Act supports and follows-up on the larger changes MAP-21 made to the statutory provisions that govern tolling on highways constructed or improved with Federal funds. Changes include provisions requiring the same treatment of over-the-road buses and public transportation vehicles on certain toll facilities. The FAST Act requires a public authority that operates a high-occupancy toll (HOT) or low emission and energy-efficient vehicle toll lane that is located on the Interstate System and within a metropolitan planning area to consult with the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the area regarding the placement and amount of tolls on the HOT lane. Finally, the FAST Act allows a waiver of sanctions for degraded high- occupancy vehicle operation under certain conditions. In addition, the FAST Act modifies some requirements of the Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program, which allows tolling an existing Interstate highway to finance needed reconstruction or rehabilitation. Specifically, it sets new time limits for an applicant to move from a provisionally-approved application to a complete application that fully satisfies the program s eligibility and selection criteria, complete the environmental review and permitting process under the National Environmental Policy Act, and execute a toll agreement with the Secretary. States for which FHWA had provisionally approved an application prior to enactment of the FAST Act have a one-year time limit, while provisional approvals subsequent to enactment of the FAST Act will have a three-year time limit. The FAST Act also gives FHWA the authority to extend either of these limits by an additional year if certain conditions in the statute are met. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 24

28 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Demonstration Set Aside of the STP (DEMO) This program provides special funding for certain projects. Enhancement Activity Set Aside of the STP (ENH) This program provides funding for pedestrian and bicycle facilities; pedestrian and bicycle safety and educational activities; acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; scenic or historic highway programs; landscaping and other scenic beautification activities; historic preservation; rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities; preservation of abandoned railway corridors; control and removal of outdoor advertising; archaeological planning and research; environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; establishment of transportation museums. Under the Tennessee Roadscapes grant program, types of work will include landscaping, irrigation, benches, trash cans, paths, and signage. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the ENH Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the ENH Program. Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) This is a new program created under MAP-21 and continued under the FAST Act. It provides funds for projects on Federal Lands Access Transportation Facilities that are located on, adjacent to, or that provide access to Federal lands. A Federal Lands access transportation facility is defined as a public highway, road, bridge, trail, or transit system that is located on, adjacent to, or provides access to Federal lands for which title or maintenance responsibility is vested in a State, county, town, township, tribal, municipal, or local government. Funds are distributed by formula among States that have Federal Lands managed by the National Park Service, the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division is responsible for administering the FLAP and serving the transportation engineering needs of these Federal Land Management agencies in Tennessee. Eligible Activities include but are not limited to: Transportation planning, research, engineering, preventive maintenance, rehabilitation, restoration, construction, and reconstruction of Federal Lands located on or adjacent to, or that: provide access to a Federal land (adjacent vehicular parking areas; acquisition of necessary scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; provisions for pedestrians and bicycles; environmental mitigation in or adjacent to Federal land to improve public safety and reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; construction and reconstruction of roadside rest areas, including sanitary and water facilities); Operation and maintenance of transit facilities. High Priority Projects (HPP and HPP-L) This program provides designated funding to the state (HPP) and Local Agencies (HPP-L) for specific projects identified by Congress. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The FAST Act continues the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-state-owned public roads and roads on tribal lands. The HSIP requires a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads that focuses on performance. The FAST Act continues the overarching requirement that HSIP funds be used for safety projects that are consistent with the State s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and that correct or improve a hazardous road location or feature or address a highway safety problem. Under MAP-21, the HSIP statute listed a range of eligible HSIP projects. However, the list was non-exhaustive, and a State could use HSIP funds on any safety project (infrastructure-related or non-infrastructure) that met the overarching requirement. In contrast, the FAST Act limits HSIP eligibility to only those listed in statute most of which are infrastructure-safety related. Interstate Maintenance (IM) This program provides funding to rehabilitate, restore, and resurface the Interstate System. Reconstruction is also eligible if it does not add capacity, and High-Occupancy-Vehicle (HOV) lanes can be added. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the IM Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the IM Program. National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) The FAST Act continues the NHPP, which provides support for the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in a State's asset management plan for the NHS. NHPP projects must be on an eligible facility and support progress toward achievement of national performance goals for improving infrastructure condition, safety, mobility, or freight movement on the NHS, and be consistent with Metropolitan and Statewide planning requirements. Eligible activities include: Construction, reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, preservation, or operational improvements of NHS segments. Construction, replacement (including replacement with fill material), rehabilitation, preservation, and protection ( including scour countermeasures, seismic retrofits, impact protection measures, security countermeasures, and pro tection against extreme events) of NHS bridges and tunnels. 25 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

29 Bridge and tunnel inspection and evaluation on the NHS and inspection and evaluation of other NHS highway infra structure assets. Training of bridge and tunnel inspectors. Construction, rehabilitation, or replacement of existing ferry boats and facilities, including approaches that connect road segments of the NHS. Construction, reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, and preservation of, and operational improve ments for, a Federal-aid highway not on the NHS, and construction of a transit project eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49, if the project is in the same corridor and in proximity to a fully access-controlled NHS route, if the improvement is more cost-effective (as determined by a benefit-cost analysis) than an NHS improvement, and will reduce delays or produce travel time savings on the NHS route and improve regional traffic flow. Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways. Highway safety improvements on the NHS. Capital and operating costs for traffic and traveler information, monitoring, management, and control facilities and programs. Development and implementation of a State Asset Management Plan for the NHS including data collection, maintenance and integration, software costs, and equipment costs. Infrastructure-based ITS capital improvements. Environmental restoration and pollution abatement. Control of noxious weeds and establishment of native species. Environmental mitigation related to NHPP projects. Construction of publicly owned intra-city or intercity bus terminals servicing the NHS. Workforce development, training, and education activities are also an eligible use of NHPP funds. Installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication equipment. Reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, or preservation of a bridge on a non-nhs Federal-aid highway (if Interstate System and NHS Bridge Condition provision requirements are satisfied). A project to reduce the risk of failure of critical NHS infrastructure (defined to mean a facility, the incapacity or failure of which would have a debilitating impact in certain specified areas). At a State's request, the U.S. DOT may use the State's STBG funding to pay the subsidy and administrative costs for TIFIA credit assistance for an eligible NHPP project or group of projects. National Highway System (NHS) This Program provides funding for major roads including the Interstate System, a large percentage of urban and rural principal arterials, the Strategic Defense Highway Network (STRAHNET), and strategic highway connectors. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the NHS Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the NHS Program. Safe Routes to School (SRTS) This program provides funding for empowering communities to make walking and bicycling to school a safe and routine activity. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the SRTS Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the SRTS Program. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 26

30 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D HIGHWAY TRUST FUND Operation of the Highway Trust Fund [31101 and 31102] The Highway Trust Fund is the source of funding for most of the programs in the Act. The HTF is comprised of the Highway Account, which funds highway and intermodal programs, and the Mass Transit Account. Federal motor fuel taxes are the major source of income into the HTF. However, the FAST Act also transfers into the HTF additional funds to keep the Fund solvent through the end of FY These include transfers from the General Fund and from the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund (a separate trust fund set up for certain environmental cleanup purposes, which is financed with a small portion of motor fuel taxes). The FAST Act includes other provisions and revenue raisers to offset the cost of the transfers made to the HTF. However, reform of the way highway programs are funded remains a challenge for the future. The FAST Act extends through September 30, 2023, the heavy vehicle use tax. It also extends through September 30, 2022 the imposition of the other highway-user taxes (generally at the rates that were in place when the legislation was enacted); provisions for full or partial exemption from highway user taxes; and provision for deposit of almost all of the highway user taxes into the HTF. Federal law regulates not only the imposition of the taxes, but also their deposit into and expenditure from the HTF. For the Highway Account, the FAST Act provides authority through September 30, 2020, to expend from the HTF for programs under the Act and previous authorization acts. Beginning on October 1, 2020, expenditures may be made only to liquidate obligations made prior to the September 30, 2020, deadline. Highway Tax Compliance [1110] Traditionally, the highway programs of the Federal government and most States depend on highway-user tax receipts as the principal source of funding. The FAST Act continues the Highway Use Tax Evasion program to reduce motor fuel tax evasion, funded at up to $4 million per year from FHWA administrative funds. Funds may be allocated to the Internal Revenue Service (for efforts including the development, operation, and maintenance of databases to support tax compliance) and the States at the discretion of the Secretary, except that $2 million per year must be used for intergovernmental enforcement efforts, including research and training. A State may also elect to use 0.25 percent of its STBG funding for fuel tax evasion activities. Finally, the FAST Act modifies annual reporting requirements for States and the Internal Revenue Service, requiring the submission of the reports to Congress (rather than just to FHWA). TRANSPORTATION PLANNING [1201 and 1202] MAP-21 made a number of reforms to the metropolitan and statewide transportation planning processes, including incorporating performance goals, measures, and targets into the process of identifying needed transportation improvements and project selection. The FAST Act includes provisions to support and enhance these reforms. Public involvement remains a hallmark of the planning process. The FAST Act continues requirements for a long-range plan and a short-term transportation improvement program (TIP), with the longrange statewide and metropolitan plans now required to include facilities that support intercity transportation, including intercity buses. The statewide and metropolitan long-range plans must describe the performance measures and targets that States and MPOs use in assessing system performance and progress in achieving the performance targets. Additionally, the FAST Act requires the planning process to consider projects/strategies to: improve the resilience and reliability of the transportation system, stormwater mitigation, and enhance travel and tourism. Finally, in an effort to engage all sectors and users of the transportation network, the FAST Act requires that the planning process include public ports and private transportation providers, and further encourages MPOs to consult during this process with officials of other types of planning activities, including tourism and natural disaster risk reduction. MAP-21 and the FAST Act also change criteria for MPO officials to provide transit provider representatives with equal authority and allow the representative to also serve as the representative of a local municipality. PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT A significant part of the reforms made by MAP-21 included transitioning to a performance-based program, including establishing national performance goals for Federal-aid highway programs. The FAST Act supports and continues this overall performance management approach, within which States invest resources in projects that collectively will make progress toward national goals. The Act also includes two new provisions related to performance management: If a State fails to meet (or make significant progress toward meeting) its freight performance targets within two years after establishment of the targets, then the State s next performance report must now include what actions it will take to achieve the targets. [1116] 27 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

31 The FAST Act shortens the timeframe for States and MPOs to make progress toward meeting performance targets under the NHPP and clarifies the significant progress timeline for the HSIP performance targets. [1406] ACCELERATING PROJECT DELIVERY Accelerating project delivery is a major theme of the FAST Act, with 18 separate provisions in the Highway title alone that are designed to increase innovation and improve efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability in the planning, environmental review, design, engineering, construction, and financing of transportation projects. The FAST Act s project delivery provisions fall within four general categories: Adding new flexibilities to increase efficiencies, such as exempting some common mid- century bridges from some environmental review, allowing at-risk bridges to be replaced without delays due to nesting swallows, and confirming that certain emergency reconstruction projects are eligible for emergency exemptions or expedited procedures under specific environmental laws. [1303, 1439, 1432] Refining existing authorities. Examples include a pilot program to allow certain States to use equally as stringent environmental laws and regulations instead of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other related regulations for environmental review, and reducing requirements to encourage greater use of the collaborative Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) process. [1309, 1305] Adding new tools to help accelerate project delivery. These changes include requirements for a schedule and checklist as part of a project coordination plan and the addition of specific new timeframes for environmental notices and reviews. Transparency and public access are a focus in all of these changes, with additional requirements for online access and status updates of the NEPA process. [1304] Building on FHWA s existing activities to accelerate project delivery, including a requirement to continue the successful Every Day Counts at least every two years. The FAST Act also requires DOT to develop a programmatic agreement template a process already underway at FHWA before the passage of the FAST Act and establish an online public access website, similar to the existing permitting dashboard, to publish the status of NEPA and permitting for all projects requiring an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment. [1444, 1315, 1304] HIGHWAY FREIGHT-RELATED PROVISIONS National Highway Freight Program [1116] The FAST Act includes an estimated average of $1.2 billion per year for a new National Highway Freight Program, which is focused on improving the efficient movement of freight on the National Highway Freight Network (NHFN). Funds are distributed to States by formula for eligible activities, such as construction, operational improvements, freight planning, and performance measurement. Although the program is highway-focused, each State may use up to 10 percent of its NHFP funds for each fiscal year for public or private freight rail, water facilities (including ports), and intermodal facilities. Starting in FY 2018, a State must have a State Freight Plan (compliant with 49 U.S.C and approved by DOT) in order to obligate NHFP funds. National Highway Freight Network [1116] The FAST Act requires FHWA to establish a National Highway Freight Network, to include the Primary Highway Freight System (PHFS), critical rural and urban freight corridors (as designated by the States, and in some cases, by MPOs), and the portions of the Interstate System not included in the PHFS. After the initial designation, FHWA must re-designate the PHFS every five years, with up to three percent growth each time. FASTLANE grants (Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects) [1105] In addition to the new formula freight program, the FAST Act also establishes a discretionary competitive grant program of $4.5 billion over five years to provide financial assistance to nationally and regionally significant highway, rail, port, and intermodal freight and highway projects. DOT refers to this program as FASTLANE grants (Fostering Advancements in Shipping and Transportation for the Long-term Achievement of National Efficiencies). Under the program, States, large MPOs, Tribes, localities, and Federal land management agencies may apply for grants for projects, which generally must have a total cost of at least $100 million. Each year, a minimum amount of funds must be used for rural projects (25 percent) and projects under the $100 million cost threshold (10 percent). MULTIMODAL FREIGHT PROVISIONS [8001] TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H In addition to its highway-oriented freight provisions, the FAST Act also includes a number of provisions related to multimodal freight policy and planning. Examples include the following: National Multimodal Freight Policy. The FAST Act establishes a national multimodal freight policy of maintaining and improv- Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 28

32 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D ing the condition and performance of the National Multimodal Freight Network. It also specifies goals associated with this national policy. National Freight Strategic Plan. The FAST Act requires DOT to develop, in consultation with a range of stakeholders, a national freight strategic plan, and to update this plan every five years thereafter. National Multimodal Freight Network. The FAST Act directs DOT to establish an interim National Multimodal Freight Network, to include the NHFN, freight rail systems of Class I railroads, the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence Seaway, inland and intracoastal waterways, ports and airports that meet specified criteria, and other strategic freight assets. Following a public comment period, DOT must designate a National Multimodal Freight Network, and DOT must redesignate this network every five years thereafter, with input from a wide range of stakeholders. State Freight Advisory Committees. Both MAP-21 and the FAST Act require DOT to encourage each State to establish a State freight advisory committee, to consist of a representative cross-section of public and private freight stakeholders. State Freight Plans. To receive funding under the NHFP, the FAST Act requires each State to develop a State Freight Plan, which must comprehensively address the State s immediate and long-range freight planning activities and investments. OTHER PROGRAMS AND PROVISIONS National Highway Performance Program [1106] The FAST Act provides an estimated average of $23.3 billion per year for the NHPP, which will support the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), enable the construction of new facilities on the NHS, and ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward achieving performance targets established in a State s asset management plan for the NHS. The FAST Act also makes the following changes to NHPP eligibilities: At a State s request, the Secretary now may use a State s NHPP apportionment to pay the subsidy and administrative costs for TIFIA credit assistance for an eligible project. It provides specific NHPP eligibility for vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication equipment. It allows States to use NHPP funds for reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, or preservation of a non- NHS bridge if the bridge is on a Federal-aid highway. Surface Transportation Block Grant Program [1109] The FAST Act converts the long-standing Surface Transportation Program into the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, acknowledging that this program has the most flexible eligibilities among all Federal-aid highway programs and aligning the program s name with how FHWA has historically administered it. The FAST Act provides an estimated annual average of $11.7 billion for STBG, which States and localities may use for projects to preserve or improve conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge projects on any public road, facilities for nonmotorized transportation, transit capital projects, and public bus terminals and facilities. The STBG program under the FAST Act continues all prior STP eligibilities and adds a few new ones. A State may now use STBG funds to create and operate a State office to help design, implement, and oversee public-private partnerships (P3) eligible to receive Federal highway or transit funding, and to pay a stipend to unsuccessful P3 bidders in certain circumstances. DOT may also, at a State s request, use the State s STBG funding to pay the subsidy and administrative costs for TIFIA credit assistance for an STBG-eligible project. Funding for Transportation Alternatives (TA) is set aside from the overall STBG funding amount. After accounting for this set-aside, FHWA distributes a percentage of a State s STBG funds based on population (suballocated), and the remaining funds are available for use anywhere in the State. The suballocated percentage starts at 51 percent in FY 2016, and then grows each year, to 55 percent in FY The FAST Act also continues to require FHWA to set aside a portion of a State s STBG funds (equal to 15 percent of the State s FY 2009 Highway Bridge Program apportionment) for bridges not on Federal-aid highways (off-system bridges), unless the Secretary determines that the State s needs are insufficient to justify this amount. Finally, it allows but does not require the Governor of a border State to designate up to five percent of the State s STBG funds for border infrastructure projects eligible under the SAFETEA-LU Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program. Funds so designated must be derived from the portion of a State s STBG apportionment available for use in any area of the State. Highway Safety Improvement Program [1113] Safety throughout all transportation programs remains DOT s number one priority. Consistent with this, the FAST Act continues the successful HSIP, providing estimated average annual funding of $2.6 billion and reserving a portion of this funding for the Railway-Highway Crossings Program. The Act also reserves $3.5 million per year from HSIP for work zone and guardrail safety training, Operation Lifesaver, and safety clearinghouses. 29 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

33 The FAST Act continues to require States to pursue under HSIP a data-driven, strategic, and performance-focused approach to improving highway safety on all public roads. The Act clarifies the range of eligible HSIP projects, limiting eligibility to activities listed in statute (most of which are infrastructure safety-related). It also adds several activities to the list, including V2I communication equipment and certain pedestrian safety improvements. As under MAP-21, States may not use HSIP funds to purchase, operate, or maintain an automated traffic enforcement system that captures an image of a vehicle, except in school zones. [1401] In order to improve data collection, MAP-21 required DOT to establish a new subset of the model inventory of roadway elements (MIRE) that are useful for the inventory of roadway safety, and to ensure that States adopted and used the subset. The FAST Act allows a State to opt out of collecting MIRE fundamental data elements for gravel or other unpaved roads. States must still collect crash data on these roads. If the State opts out, it may not use HSIP funds on projects on such roads unless or until it collects this data. Railway-Highway Crossings Program [1108] The FAST Act continues the Railway-Highway Crossings Program, providing funds for safety improvements to reduce the number of fatalities, injuries, and crashes at public railway-highway grade crossings. This funding continues as a set-aside from HSIP, which the FAST Act reserves at an average of $235 million per year. Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program [1114] The CMAQ program, continued in the FAST Act at an estimated average annual funding level of $2.4 billion, provides a funding source to State and local governments for transportation projects and programs to help meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Funding is available to reduce congestion and improve air quality for areas that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter (nonattainment areas), as well as former nonattainment areas that are now in compliance (maintenance areas). States with no nonattainment or maintenance areas may use their CMAQ funds for any CMAQ- or STBG-eligible project. Under the FAST Act, a State with PM2.5 (fine particulate matter) nonattainment or maintenance areas must use a portion of its funds to address PM2.5 emissions in such areas. The FAST Act highlights diesel retrofits and port related equipment and vehicles as eligible projects to mitigate PM2.5. New exemptions from this PM2.5 priority set-aside are also included for certain circumstances outlined in the FAST Act. Highlighted CMAQ eligibilities include public transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, travel demand management strategies, alternative fuel vehicles, facilities serving electric or natural gas-fueled vehicles (except where this conflicts with prohibition on rest area commercialization) and a new explicit eligibility for V2I communication equipment. Transportation Alternatives [1109] The FAST Act eliminates the MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) and replaces it with a set-aside of STBG funding for transportation alternatives. These set-aside funds include all projects and activities that were previously eligible under TAP, encompassing a variety of smaller-scale transportation projects such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes to school projects, community improvements such as historic preservation and vegetation management, and environmental mitigation related to stormwater and habitat connectivity. The FAST Act sets aside an average of $844 million per year for TA. Unless a State opts out, it must use a specified portion of its TA funds for recreational trails projects. Similar to MAP-21, after the set-aside for the Recreational Trails Program, the FAST Act requires FHWA to distribute 50 percent of TA funds to areas based on population (suballocated), with the remainder available for use anywhere in the State. States and MPOs for urbanized areas with more than 200,000 people will conduct a competitive application process for the use of TA funds; eligible applicants include tribal governments, local governments, transit agencies, school districts, and a new eligibility for nonprofit organizations responsible for local transportation safety programs. The Act also newly allows each urbanized area of this size to use up to half of its suballocated TA funds for any STBG-eligible purpose (but still subject to the TA-wide requirement for competitive selection of projects). Federal Lands and Tribal Transportation Programs [ , 1123] The FAST Act continues to acknowledge the importance of access to Federal and tribal lands. Recognizing the need for all public Federal and tribal transportation facilities to be treated under uniform policies similar to those that apply to Federal-aid highways and other public transportation facilities, the FAST Act continues a unified program for Federal lands transportation facilities, Federal lands access transportation facilities, and tribal transportation facilities. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H The Federal Lands Transportation Program (FLTP) provides an average of $355 million annually for projects that improve ac- Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 30

34 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D cess within the Federal estate (such as national parks, forests, and recreation areas), on infrastructure owned by the Federal government. The FAST Act adds the Bureau of Land Management and other independent Federal land management agencies as FLTP partners. The program includes dedicated annual set-asides for the National Park Service ($284 million), the Fish and Wildlife Service ($30 million), and the Forest Service ($17 million), with additional partners competing for the remaining $24 million. The Federal Lands Access Program provides an average of $260 million annually for projects that improve access to Federal lands on infrastructure owned by States and local governments. Projects providing access to any Federal lands are eligible for this comprehensive program and funds are distributed by formula based on recreational visitation, Federal land area, Federal public road mileage, and the number of Federal public bridges. The FAST Act made no substantive changes to this program. The Tribal Transportation Program provides an average of $485 million annually for projects that improve access to and within Tribal lands. This program is generally continued in the same manner, but with a lower set-aside for Bureau of Indian Affairs and FHWA administration of program management and oversight (now 5 percent instead of 6 percent), and a higher setaside for tribal bridges (now 3 percent instead of 2 percent). Additionally, the FAST Act adds new annual reporting requirements for any entity carrying out a project under this program. The Tribal Self-Governance Program provides a new opportunity (without additional funding) for qualified tribes to take more direct control and have increased flexibility for the highway and transit funds that they receive from DOT. To participate, a tribe must show three fiscal years of demonstrated financial stability and capability in financial and program management. If this is met, the terms of the agreement will be specified in a multi-year compact between DOT and the tribe. Under an annual agreement, the tribe will plan, consolidate, and receive its full tribal share funding, tribal transit formula funding, and any discretionary/competitive grant funding that is administered by DOT. Using a negotiated rulemaking approach, DOT will establish a committee of representatives from various interest groups, including tribal governments, to negotiate the text of a proposed rule with the goal of reaching consensus on the rule. The FAST Act also authorizes a new Nationally Significant Federal Lands & Tribal Projects Program, with all funds subject to appropriation. If Congress appropriates this funding, the program will provide grants to construct, reconstruct, and rehabilitate nationallysignificant projects on Federal or tribal lands. To be eligible, a project must have a total cost of at least $25 million, with priority for projects costing $50 million or more. [1123] Emergency Relief [1107] The ER program assists Federal, State, tribal, and local governments with the expense of repairing serious damage to Federal-aid, tribal, and Federal Lands highways resulting from natural disasters or catastrophic failures. ER is funded by a permanent authorization of $100 million per year, so it did not require additional funding authorization under the FAST Act. However, the FAST Act does make two other changes to the program. First, it clarifies the eligibility of debris removal on facilities eligible under the Emergency Relief for Federally Owned Roads program. Second, it eliminates the prior ability of facilities under the Federal Lands Access Program to qualify for 100 percent Federal share under ER. Territorial and Puerto Rico Highway Program [1115] The FAST Act continues funding for the Territorial Highway program ($42 million annually) and the Puerto Rico Highway program ($158 million annually). Construction of Ferry Boats and Ferry Terminal Facilities [1112] Distributed by formula, this program provides $80 million annually to construct ferry boats and ferry terminal facilities. The FAST Act modifies the formula, now giving more weight to the number of ferry passengers. It also requires FHWA to withdraw unobligated program funds after four years and distribute them to other eligible recipients. Design Guidelines [1404, 1442] The FAST Act enhances design flexibility while promoting safety. Specifically, the Act authorizes alternative design guidelines to better accommodate pedestrian and bicyclists (amendments to 23 U.S.C. 109), and also directs DOT to identify best practices to provide safe and adequate accommodation of all users of the surface transportation network in all phases of project planning, development, and operation. RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY, AND EDUCATION The FAST Act supports the changes implemented in MAP-21 for a nationally-coordinated research and technology program that addresses fundamental, long-term highway research needs, significant research gaps, emerging issues with national implications, and 31 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

35 research related to policy and planning. The Secretary provides leadership for the national coordination of research and technology transfer activities, conducting and coordinating research projects, and partnering with State highway agencies and other stakeholders. All research activities are to include a component of performance measurement and evaluation, should be outcome- based, and must be consistent with the research and technology development strategic plan. The FAST Act authorizes an average of $418 million per year for the following six programs: Highway Research and Development (HRD), Technology and Innovation Deployment Program (TIDP), Training and Education, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), University Transportation Research (administered by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R)), and the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (administered by OST- R). It also establishes two new discretionary programs: the Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives Program (funded by a set-aside from HRD); and the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program (funded by set-asides from HRD, TIDP, and ITS). The following is a description of the research, development, technology, and education programs administered by FHWA. Highway Research and Development Program [6002] The FAST Act provides $125 million per year for the HRD program. Research areas include highway safety, infrastructure integrity, planning and environment, highway operations, exploratory advanced research, and operation of the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. In addition to the general activities described above, the FAST Act reserves some HRD funds for specific purposes: $15 million in FY 2016 and $20 million in each of FYs for the Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives Program. [6020] An unspecified amount for each of FYs as one component of $60 million in annual funding for the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program. [6004] Up to $5 million in FY 2016 to engage the Transportation Research Board to study the actions needed to upgrade and restore the Interstate System to meet the demands of the next 50 years. [6021] Up to $10 million per year for data sets and data analysis tools to assist State, MPO, and FHWA performance management activities. [6028] Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives Program [6020] The FAST Act sets aside from HRD $15 million for FY 2016 and $20 million for each of FY for a new Surface Transportation System Funding Alternatives Program. The program will provide grants to States to demonstrate user based alternative revenue mechanisms that utilize a user fee structure to maintain the long-term solvency of the Highway Trust Fund. Grants have a maximum Federal share of 50 percent. Technology and Innovation Deployment Program [ ] The FAST Act authorizes an average of $67.4 million per year for TIDP, which accelerates implementation and delivery of new innovations and technologies that result from highway research and development. Of TIDP funds, FHWA must use at least $12 million per year of these funds to accelerate the deployment and implementation of pavement technology [6003]; and an unspecified amount for each of FYs as one component of $60 million in annual funding for the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program. [6004] Training and Education [6002] The FAST Act authorizes $24 million per year for continuation of training and education programs, including the National Highway Institute, the Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP), the Tribal Technical Assistance Program (TTAP), the Dwight D. Eisenhower Transportation Fellowships, the Garrett A. Morgan Technology and Transportation Education Program, the Transportation Education Development Program, the Freight Capacity Building Program, and the Centers for Excellence in the areas of environment, safety, and project finance. The Federal share for LTAP and TTAP centers remains at 50 percent and 100 percent, respectively. Intelligent Transportation Systems Program [ ] The FAST Act authorizes $100 million per year for the ITS Program, which conducts research to advance transportation safety, mobility, and environmental sustainability through electronic and information technology applications. The FAST Act adds enhancement of the national freight system to the ITS program goals, along with support for national freight policy goals. The FAST Act also requires FHWA to use an unspecified amount of ITS Program funds for each of FYs as one component of $60 million in annual funding for the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program [6004]. Finally, the Act specifies that the program be administered by FHWA. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 32

36 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program [6004] The FAST Act establishes this program to fund eligible entities model deployment sites for large-scale implementation and operation of a diverse set of advanced transportation technologies in various geographic regions. Program purposes are to reduce costs and improve return on investments, deliver environmental benefits through increased mobility, improve transportation system operations, improve safety, improve collection and dissemination of real-time information, monitor transportation assets, deliver economic benefits, and accelerate deployment of connected/autonomous vehicle technologies. FHWA will award five to ten grants each year, with a maximum grant size of $12 million and a maximum Federal share of 50 percent. States, local governments or other political subdivisions, transit agencies, large MPOs (representing 200,000 or more population), multijurisdictional groups, and consortia of research or academic institutions may apply. Funding for this program (a total of $60 million for each of FY ) is set aside from HRD, TIDP, and ITS. FOR MORE INFORMATION APPENDIX B Additional information related to the FAST Act, including fact sheets and guidance for individual programs and provisions, is available on the Federal Highway Administration s FAST Act website at FHWA will continue to add material to this website as it implements the new law. APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Regional Significance and Air Quality Attainment Status Regionally significant project means a transportation project that is on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside the region; major activity centers in the region; major planned developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, or employment centers; or transportation terminals) and would normally be included in the modeling of the metropolitan area's transportation network. At a minimum, this includes all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer a significant alternative to regional highway travel, per 23 CFR Regional significance is collaboratively determined by each nonattainment and/or maintenance area s respective Interagency Consultation group, per 40 CFR The EPA s Green Book of nonattainment and maintenance statuses is available at: www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook Advance Construction Advance Construction (AC) is a technique which allows a State to initiate a project using non-federal funds while preserving eligibility for future Federal-Aid funds. Eligibility means that FHWA has determined that the project technically qualifies for Federal-Aid; however, no present or future Federal funds are committed to the project. After an AC project is authorized, the state may convert the project to regular Federal-Aid funding provided Federal funds are made available for the project. An AC project must meet the same requirements and be processed in the same manner as a regular Federal-Aid project. All phases of a project must meet federal requirements for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act), etc, when any phase is implemented with Federal-Aid funds. APPENDIX H 33 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

37 Table D-1: FY STBG Road Project Ranking Criteria Criteria Points Infrastructure Condition 16 Project Improves or Maintains an Existing Roadway or Transit Operation 6 Project Upgrades Route (Design Improvements, Complete Streets, Etc.) 3 Project Integrates ITS Service Packages included in the MPO's Regional ITS Architecture 2 Existing Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5 50,000 or more 5 30,000 to 49, ,000 to 29, ,000 to 9, ,999 or less 1 Safety 16 Accident Rate 8 Accident Rate or more 8 Accident Rate to Accident Rate 6.01 to Accident Rate 4.01 to Accident Rate 2.01 to Accident Rate less than Project Incorporates Traffic Calming and Design Improvements (Maximum Combined Points) 4 Pedestrian Safety (Bullbouts/Neckdowns, Center Islands, Diverters, etc.) 1 Control Speed (Chicanes, Textured Pavement, Speed Humps, etc.) 1 Change Travel Patterns (Roundabouts, Realigned Intersections, etc.) 1 Additional Design Improvements (Road Design, Roadside Hardware, Improved Signage, etc.) 1 Project Incorporates Security Improvements (surveillance cameras, lighting, emergency access, etc.) 4 Congestion Reduction 14 Bicycle Related Improvements (Maximum Combined Points) 4 Project scope includes cycle track or shared use path 3 Project scope includes signed and painted bike lane or bicycle boulevard 2 Project scope includes end of trip facilities (Wayfinding Signs, Racks, Etc) 1 Project scope does not include bicycle facility 0 Pedestrian Related Improvements (Maximum Combined Points) 4 Project scope includes ADA accessible sidewalks, curb ramps, shared use path, or overpass/underpass 3 Project scope includes pedestrian signals or enhanced on-street crossing facilities 2 Project scope includes marked crosswalks 1 Project scope includes pedestrian amenities 1 Project scope does not include pedestrian facilities 0 Transit Related Improvements 4 Project scope includes shelters, signage, or other amenities on an existing or proposed transit route 3 Project scope includes sidewalk access improvements on an existing or proposed transit route 1 Project scope does not include any transit related improvement 0 Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan 2 Corridor priority ranking in the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan: # Corridor priority ranking in the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan: # Corridor is not a ranked priority in the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan 0 Economic Vitality/Freight Movement 14 Economic Vitality 6 Project located near existing and proposed employment centers: Project serves 500 or more jobs 3 Project serves jobs 2 Project serves 0-99 jobs 1 Project supports high growth areas and/or revitalizes existing developed zones: Project serves 500 or more acres of industrial or commercial property 3 Project serves acres of industrial or commercial property 2 Project serves acres of industrial or commercial property 1 Freight Movement (Maximum Combined Points) 6 Freight Routes: Project located on regional freight route and includes freight related improvements 4 Project located on local freight route and includes freight related improvements 2 Project enhances rail, air, or port related freight movements 2 Network Continuity 2 Project provides regional network continuity 2 Project provides local network continuity 1 Project provides no network continuity 0 APPENDIX-D Project Ranking Criteria Definitions The Infrastructure Condition criterion considers the condition of the existing transportation system with an emphasis on maintaining existing transportation assets and infrastructure. 6 points will be awarded to projects that improve or maintain an existing roadway or transit operations. 3 points will be awarded to projects that provide upgrades such as design improvements and complete streets strategies as discussed in the Memphis MPO's Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). 2 points will be awarded to projects that integrate ITS technology as described in the MPO's Memphis Urban Area Regional ITS Architectures Deployment Plan. Up to 5 points will be given to projects that have high existing average daily traffic (ADT) counts. The Safety criterion is intended to measure the potential improvements to public safety and security that the proposed project will provide. It applies to both motorized and non-motorized users of the transportation system. Principal consideration will be given to the potential safety and security improvements directly related to the proposed project for all modes of transportation. Up to 8 points will be awarded to projects that have a higher accident rate. Projects incorporating traffic calming and design improvements will be awarded up to 4 points. 4 points will be awarded for any project that incorporates security improvements such as such surveillance cameras, lighting, emergency access, or any other additional security considerations. The greater the potential improvement to overall transportation safety and security, the higher the score for the potential project. A detailed list of traffic calming improvements and additional design improvements is included in the supporting documents. The Congestion Reduction criterion awards points to projects that reduce congestion by enhancing non-automotive modes of transportation. Projects will be awarded up to 4 points each for increased bicycle, pedestrian, and/or transit access and mobility, for a total of 12 points. The MPO's Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan ranks 788 corridors in the Memphis MPO region. Up to 2 points will be awarded if the project is identified as one of the 788 ranked corridors on either the Bicycle or Pedestrian Corridor Improvements Priorities table in the Appendix of the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. The list of ranked corridors is also included in the supporting documents. Graphic illustrations of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit related improvements from the MPO's Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan are included in the supporting documents. MATA's existing transit route map and the preferred alternative transit routes from MATA's Short Range Transit Plan are also included in the supporting documents. The Economic Vitality/Freight Movement criterion takes into account the overall economic impact that projects will have on the area as well as the impact projects will have on freight movement. Projects will be awarded up to 6 points for both economic vitality and freight movement for a total of 12 points. Economic Vitality focuses on the accessibility and mobility of projects to jobs as well as the service to developed or developable industrial or commercial properties. Freight Movement focuses on projects that improve freight routes with heavy truck traffic as well as those that enhance rail, air, or port related movement. The Memphis MPO's Freight Route Map along with a list of freight related improvements is included in the supporting documents. Network continuity considers the need for overall system efficiency for each evaluated project. 2 points will be given to projects that increase the efficiency of the overall transportation system for the region and 1 point will be given to projects that provide local network continuity. For example, 2 points will be awarded to a project that either widens a segment of road that already connects two previously widened segments or connects existing freight corridors and has a significant regional impact. Regional network continuity are those projects that foster greater connection region wide, whereas local network continuity only has localized benefits. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 34

38 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Table D-2: FY STBG Road Project Ranking Criteria (continued) System Reliability 14 Existing Volume to Capacity Ratio (V/C) 4 More than to to or less 1 Travel Time Delay Reduction 10 Delay reduction more than 2.0 min 5 Delay reduction 1.60 to 2.0 min 4 Delay reduction 1.20 to 1.60 min 3 Delay reduction 0.80 to 1.20 min 2 Delay reduction 0.20 to 0.80 min 1 Delay reduction less than 0.20 min 0 Utilizes CMP Strategies X 2 Project Delivery 14 Project Readiness 10 Timely obligation of all FY 2014 & FY 2015 funds 10 Partial obligation or advanced work shown 5 Local Funding Overmatch 4 36% or more Local Match 4 26% - 35% Local Match 2 21% - 25% Local Match 1 Environmental Sustainability 12 Environmental Justice Impacts (Maximum Combined Points) 3 Project provides transit improvements in an Environmental Justice area 1 Project provides safety enhancements in an Environmental Justice area 1 Project provides bicycle and/or pedestrian improvements in an Environmental Justice area 1 Minimal Environmental Justice Impacts 0 Environmental Impacts 3 Minimal Environmental Impacts 3 Negative Environmental Justice and/or Environmental Impacts -6 Project Provides Linkages Between Different Land Uses 3 3 or more links 3 2 links 2 1 link 1 Adopted Plans 2 Project is consistent with adopted comprehensive and/or road plans and has positive land use impacts 2 Project in an area without adopted comprehensive and/or road plans and has positive land use impacts 1 Project is inconsistent with adopted comprehensive and/or road plans and has negative land use impacts -2 Project Serves a Strategic Area Targeted for Development 1 Total Points 100 The System Reliability criterion quantifies the predicted improvements in the congestion levels (Volume to Capacity Ratio and Travel Time Delay) for the project and major parallel facilities. Up to 4 points will be given to projects that have high volume to capacity ratios. Up to 10 points will be given to projects that result in more time saved in terms of travel time delay and utilizes two or more of the 10 Congestion Management Process Strategies, excluding general purpose lanes, as discussed in the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP). Submitted projects will be modeled to estimate the travel time savings by comparing the travel time with or without the project. If a project falls on a congested network or impacts an adjacent congested network and utilizes two or more of the 10 CMP Strategies, excluding general purpose lanes, as part of the project scope, then the points received from the Travel Time Delay Reduction can be multiplied by two. For example, if your project has a delay reduction of 0.9 minutes and you include intersection and signalization improvements than your project will be awarded a total of 4 points for Travel Time Delays. 2 points (Delay reduction 0.80 to 1.20 min) X 2 points (CMP Strategy) = 4 points total for Travel Time Delays The 10 CMP strategies from the 2040 RTP, as well as Appendix B-1 Strategy Toolbox from the MPO's Congestion Management Process (CMP), which looks at examples of the CMP strategies is included in the supporting documents. The Project Delivery criterion awards projects that have demonstrated project readiness through obligation or advanced work as well as an overmatch for required local funds. Project readiness applies only to carry over projects which have demonstrated advance work and have progressed since the project was originally submitted. 10 points will be awarded if the project has shown timely obligation on all FY 2014 and FY 2015 funds in the FY TIP. 5 points will be awarded if the project received partial obligation or if advanced work has been shown. Most federal funded programs requires a match of i.e. 80% of the funds are provided by the federal government and 20% by local lead agency. This criterion awards up to 4 points to projects for which lead agency can overmatch the minimum 20% match requirement. No points will be awarded if only the minimum match funds i.e. 20% are included in the project cost. Documentation, such as a signed letter from the Mayor or resolution from local legislative board, will need to be provided for projects seeking points for additional match. The Environmental Sustainability criterion considers the impacts of projects on Environmental Justice (EJ) communities and the physical environment as well as the relationship between transportation and land use. Under Environmental Justice, up to 3 points will be awarded for projects that positively impact the EJ communities. For example, if the project incorporates safety improvements in an EJ community, it will be considered as a positive EJ impact and receive 1 point. Under Environmental Impacts, 3 points will be awarded if the project has minimal environmental impacts on the physical environment such as wetlands and cultural resources. A project will receive -6 points if it negatively impacts an EJ community and/or the Environment. For example, if the project displaces residents and splits the community or impacts the environment such as crossing an established wetland or demolishing a historic site it would be considered a negative impact. Projects will be considered having minimal impacts if proper mitigation strategies, as discussed in 2040 RTP, were applied. Projects that provide linkages between different land uses will be awarded 1 point for each connection to a different land use for a maximum total of 3 points for 3 or more links. Examples of different land uses include retail/commercial, office, residential, industrial, and open space, etc. 2 points will be awarded to projects that are consistent with locally adopted plans. The project should substantially advance the vision, goals, and land use recommendations of the adopted plan. Plans to be considered include, but are not limited to, comprehensive plans, land use plans, special district plans, or road plans. Projects that are located in areas without an adopted plan and have positive land use impacts will be awarded 1 point in this category. Projects that are inconsistent with locally adopted plans and have a negative impact on land use will be awarded -2 points. Examples of negative land use impacts include, but are not limited to, displacement of existing businesses or residents, potential for significant change to the character of an area, potential to spur development that is incompatible with existing adjacent development. An additional 1 point will be awarded to projects that serve a strategic zone targeted by the jurisdiction for development or revitalization. These zones may be recognized by the municipality as locations targeted for development through tax breaks and other incentives. APPENDIX H 35 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

39 Table D-3: FY Resurfacing Criteria Resurfacing Criteria Score Pavement Condition Index (PCI) 20 Less than More than 85 5 ADT 10 50,000 or more 10 30,000 to 49, ,000 to 29, ,000 to 9, ,999 or less 2 Proximity to Land Uses 8 Industrial 8 Commercial, Retail or Office 4 Residential 2 Bicycle Related Improvements 3 Project scope includes cycle track or shared-use path 2 Project scope includes signed and painted bike lane or bicycle boulevard 1 Project scope includes end of trip facilities (Wayfinding Signs, Racks, Etc.) 1 Project scope does not include bicycle facility 0 Pedestrian Related Improvements 3 Project scope includes ADA accessible sidewalks, curp ramps, shared use path, or overpass/underpass 2 Project scope includes pedestrian signals, enhanced on-street crossing facilities, marked crosswalks and/or pedestrian amenities Project scope does not include pedestrian facilities 0 Transit Related Improvements 3 Project is located on an existing or proposed transit route 2 Project scope includes sidewalk access improvements on an existing or proposed transit route Project scope does not include any transit related improvement 0 Freight Related Improvements 3 Project includes improvements on a route on the MPO's Freight Route Map 3 Resurfacing Criteria total points Table D-4: FY Signalization Criteria Signalization Criteria Score Existing Intersection Level of Service (LOS) 15 LOS F 15 LOS E 10 LOS D 8 LOS C 6 LOS A or B 4 Reduction in Delay (sec/vehicle) or more or less 2 ADT 8 50,000 or more 8 30,000 to 49, ,000 to 29, ,000 to 9, ,999 or less 1 Accident Rate 5 Accident Rate or more 5 Accident Rate to Accident Rate 6.01 to Accident Rate 4.01 to Accident Rate 2.01 to Accident Rate less than Other 12 Project Benefits Other Modes of Transportation 3 Project is Part of Coordinated Signal Project 3 Project Incorporates Newer Technology 3 Project is Consistent with the MPO's Regional ITS Architecture 3 Signalization Criteria total points 50 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 36

40 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table D-5: FY Bicycle and Pedestrian Criteria Bicycle and Pedestrian Criteria Score APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C Proximity to Land Uses (within 1/2 mile ped, 3 mile bicycle) 10 Schools and Colleges 2 Parks 2 Major and Local Retail Centers 2 Major Employment Centers 2 Transit Routes 2 Network Continuity 10 Project provides regional network continuity - region wide benefits 10 Project provides local network continuity - localized benefits 5 No Network continuity 0 Bicycle Related Improvements 8 Project scope includes cycle track or shared-use path 5 Project scope includes signed and painted bike lane or bicycle boulevard 4 APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Project scope includes end of trip facilities (Wayfinding Signs, Racks, Etc.) 3 Project scope does not include bicycle facility 0 Pedestrian Related Improvements 8 Project scope includes ADA accessible sidewalks, curp ramps, shared use path, or overpass/underpass 4 Project scope includes pedestrian signals or enhanced on-street crossing facilities 2 Project scope includes marked crosswalks 1 Project scope includes pedestrian amenities 1 Project scope does not include pedestrian facilities 0 Pedestrian Priority in Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan 5 Corridor Priority Ranking # Corridor Priority Ranking # Corridor Priority Ranking # Corridor is not a ranked priority in the Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan 0 APPENDIX H Incorporates Traffic Calming and Design Improvements 4 Project Addresses Location with History of Fatal Bike/Ped Crashes 5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Criteria total points Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

41 Table D-6: FY Bridge Criteria Bridge Criteria Score Bridge Condition 20 Poor 20 Fair 10 Good 5 ADT 15 50,000 or more 15 30,000 to 49, ,000 to 29, ,000 to 9, ,999 or less 1 Freight Related Improvements 5 Project includes improvements on a route on the MPO's Freight Route Map 5 Bicycle and Pedestrian Related Improvements 5 Project scope includes cycle track, shared-use path, signed and painted bike lanes, or bicycle boulevard 2 Project scope includes ADA accessible pedestrian facility 2 Project is included in the MPO's Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan 1 Network Continuity 5 Project provides regional network continuity - region wide benefits 5 Project provides local network continuity - localized benefits 3 No Network continuity 0 Bridge Criteria total points 50 Table D-7: FY Safety Grouping Criteria Safety Grouping Score Accident Rate 15 Accident Rate or more 15 Accident Rate to Accident Rate 6.01 to Accident Rate 4.01 to Accident Rate 2.01 to Accident Rate less than Number of Severe Crashes: Fatal and Incapacitating over 3- Year period 10 8 or more 10 7 to to or less 1 Existing Intersection Level of Service (LOS) 15 LOS F 10 LOS E 8 LOS D 4 LOS C 2 LOS A or B 0 Proximity to Land Uses (within 1/2 mile ped, 3 mile bicycle) 10 Schools and Colleges 2 Parks 2 Major and Local Retail Centers 2 Major Employment Centers 2 Transit Routes 2 Safety Criteria total points 50 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 38

42 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Table D-8: FY 2015 TA Criteria FY 2015 TAP Criteria Score Benefits to Active Transportation 20 Safety & Security 16 Accident Rate 4 Fatalities/ Incapcitating 4 Traffic Claming & Design Improvements 4 Pedestrian Safety 1 Speed Control 1 Volume Control 1 Design Improvements 1 Security Improvements 4 Multimodal Improvements 12 Bicycle Improvements 4 Cycle Track or Shared Use Path 3 Signed and Painted Bike Lane or Bicycle Blvd 2 Paved Shoulder or Shared Lane 1 End of Trip Facilities 1 Pedestrian Improvements 4 Sidewalks, Curb Ramps, Path or Over/Underpass 3 Signals or Enhanced Crossing 2 Crosswalk 1 Pedestrian Amenities 1 Bike/ Pedestrian Improvements 4 Transit Improvements 4 Sidewalk Access 1 Shelters or other amenities 3 Land Use 16 Pedestrian Facilities 1/2 mile buffer 5 Schools or Colleges 1 Parks 1 Retail Centers 1 Employment Centers 1 Transit Routes 1 Bicycle Facilities 3 mile buffer 5 Schools or Colleges 1 Parks 1 Retail Centers 1 Employment Centers 1 Transit Routes 1 Consistent with Local Plans 3 Negative Land Use Impact 3 Strategic Development Zone 3 System Preservation 6 Improve or Maintain 2 Upgrade Existing 2 ITS Improvements 2 Environmental Preservation & Environmental Justice 6 Environmental Justice 3 Positive Impact 3 Minimal Impact 0 Negative Impact 3 Environmental Impact 3 Minimal Impact 3 Negative Impact 3 Network Continunity 6 Regional 6 Localized 3 None 0 Cost Effectiveness 6 Economic Opportunity 12 Pedestrian Users Employment Centers Bicycle Users Employment Centers Pedestrian Users Industrial & Commerical Bicycle Users Industrial & Commerical Congestion/Air Quality 2 CMP Strategies 2 Local Overmatch 10 Total 113 Note: Highest possible score is 103 without the local overmatch bonus, and 113 with the bonus. Note: *If Accident Rate (AR) is less than 2, then 0 points will be awarded. If AR<4, then 1. If AR<6, then 2. If AR<10, then 3. If AR>10, then Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

43 Supporting Documents TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 40

44 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 41 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

45 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 42 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

46 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 43 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

47 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 44 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

48 APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS 45 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

49 APPENDIX-E Table E-1: Status of TDOT Projects in FY TIP TDOT Projects Project Name Project ID Project Description Status I-40 Canada Road I-40 [HPP-ID# 1359, 4945 and 34, I-240 East of Memphis (Phase 2)] I-55 [Interchange at Crump Boulevard] I-240 Midtown [HPP ID # I- 40 to I-55] I-240 [Interchange at Airways Blvd.] I-240 Bridges (Replacement of 3 Overhead Bridges) SR-14 (Austin Peay Highway) From SR-204 (Singleton Pkwy) to east of Old Covington Pike) National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) Grouping Surface Transportation (STP) Grouping Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grouping NHS NHS Interchange improvements including replacing bridges, reconstructing acceleration and deceleration lanes and tapers Construct I-40 flyover ramp TN-IM Interchange modification Project not carried over. Estimated completion in 2017 Project not carried over. Estimated completion in 2017 NHS Widen 6 lanes to 8 lanes TN-IM Modify interchange TN-NHPP TN-NHPP TN-NHPP TN-STP TN-HSIP Replacement of 3 Overhead Bridges; Norfolk Southern RR (LM 15.45), Poplar Ave (SR-57 EB LM 15.57), and Poplar Ave (SR-57 WB LM Reconstruct and widen from 2 lanes to 5 lanes. Project Complete Reurfacing, guardrail, slide repair, signs, signals, marking, intersection/ interchange modifications, sight distance modifications, nosie walls, wetland and or stream mitigation, safety improvements, bridge replacement, repair, rehabilitation, preseravation, rockfall mitigation, sidewalks traffic calming, pedestrian and or bicycle facilities, ITS operations, maintenance, power communications, construction, operate the TN 511 system, freeway service patrols, traffic diversion, non-infrastructure, school and other flashing signals, bridge and tunnel inspection, rail-highway grade crossing improvements, enhancement activities, etc. Reurfacing, guardrail, slide repair, signs, signals, marking, intersection/ interchange modifications, sight distance modifications, nosie walls, wetland and or stream mitigation, safety improvements, bridge replacement, repair, rehabilitation, preseravation, rockfall mitigation, sidewalks traffic calming, pedestrian and or bicycle facilities, ITS operations, maintenance, power communications, construction, operate the TN 511 system, freeway service patrols, traffic diversion, non-infrastructure, school and other flashing signals, bridge and tunnel inspection, rail-highway grade crossing improvements, enhancement activities, etc. Any strategy, activity or project on a public road that is consistent with the State Strategic Highway Plan (SHSP) and corrects or improves a harzardous road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem. Including workforce development, training and education activities, alignment, intersection interchange improvements, signalization, Cary over into new TIP guardrail, lighting, marking, railroad crossings, railroad crossing pads, bells, lights, gates, pavement markings, bridge and tunnel inventory and inspections on all public roads, etc. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H SR-4 (US-78 / Lamar Avenue) TN-NHPP Reconstruct and widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes (divided) Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 46

50 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Table E-2: Status of MDOT Projects in FY TIP MDOT Projects Project Name Project ID Project Description Status I-55 (relocated SR-304 to Church Rd) MS-NHS Widen to 6 lanes I-55 (Church Rd to SR-302) MS-NHS Widen to 8 lanes Project will be completed in this cycle, no carry-over Project will be completed in this cycle, no carry-over will be completed Star Landing Corridor (Tulane to Getwell) MS-NHS Widen to 4 lanes (divided) SR-304 /I-269 (I-55 to SR-305) MS-SSTP Paving of new 4-lane freeway Project will be completed in this cycle, no carry-over SR-304 /I-269 (SR-305 to Marshall County Line) MS-SSTP Paving of new 4-lane freeway Project will be completed in this cycle, no carry-over SR 304/I-269 (Marshall County Line to East of Project will be completed in MS-SSTP Paving of new 4-lane freeway Mason Road) this cycle, no carry-over SR 304/I-269 (East of Mason Road to SR 302) MS-SSTP Paving of new 4-lane freeway Project will be completed in this cycle, no carry-over SR-304 /I-269 (I-55 to Marshall County Line) MS-SSTP Repayment of bonds for the construction of SR-304/I-269 in Desoto County Intersection US-51 & Star Landing Road MS-SSTP Intersection improvements Project not carried over I-55 (at Commerce Street) MS-NHPP Interchange reconstruction Project not carried over SR 304 and McIngvale Road Interchange MS0NHPP Interchange reconstruction Maintenance and Repair Grouping MS-SSTP Funds will be used for operation, maintenance or minor reconstruction works I-55 Slide Repair MS-SSTP Slide Repair Project will be completed in this cycle, no carry-over Funds will be used for congestion Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Group CMAQ reduction and improvement of air quality MS 302 (I-55 to Marshall County Line) MS-HSIP Access management study & geometric improvements and equipment upgrades Project will be completed in this cycle, no carry-over APPENDIX H 47 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

51 Table E-3: Status of Local Tennessee Projects in FY TIP Local TN Projects Project Name Project ID Project Description Status Airline Road Improvement Phase 1 Hall Creek Bridge [Hall Creek Bridge over Airline Road] Biomedical Planning District Byhalia Road Widening [South of Shelby Post Rd. to SR 385] Church Street at Navy Road Intersection Improvements [South of Buford Ave to Navy Rd] Elvis Presley Blvd [Shelby Drive to Brooks Road] Forest Hill Irene [Walnut Grove to Macon Road] Holmes Road East [Malone to Lamar] Holmes Road-West [Mill Branch to Tchulahoma] Kirby/Whitten Parkway [Walnut Grove Road to Macon Road] STP-M HPP STP-M STP-M ENH STP-M Widen the existing 2-lane bridge over Hall Creek to a 5-lane bridge. The roadway capacity approaching the bridge is not been increased Reconstruction of sidewalks and curbs and streetscape improvements along roadways in this district Widen Byhalia Rd from 2 lanes to 4 lanes divided between Shelby Drive Rd and SR 385 including intersection improvements at Byhalia Rd and Shelby Drive. Construct Shelby Drive from approximately 1,100 feet west of Byhalia Rd to Byhalia Rd. Connect Byhalia Rd to the five lane section south of the Byhalia Rd/Shelby Drive intersection. Widening Church Street north of Navy Road to provide additional southbound lane, drainage improvements, and replacement of traffic signal including emergency vehicle preemption and video detection. Project completed, no carry over. Fully obligated, project is complete. Project not carried over Construct a six lane heavily landscaped roadway adjacent to Graceland, which includes median, wide outside lanes for bikes and a bus stop turn-out lane. From Craft to Winchester widen from four to six lanes with a median. The other two segments will have the same existing laneage, but the entire project will have improved ped/bike/bus stop and landscaping. Construct new six lane roadway with a median and a bike path. The project also includes an 1,100 foot extension of Trinity Road from Sanga Creek Road to Forest Hill Irene. Trinity Road will maintain a seven lane cross section. STP-M Widen existing two lane roadway to seven lanes. STP-M STP-M Widen existing four and two lane roadway to seven lanes. Widen Walnut Grove Road from 4 lanes to 6 lanes from just east of the Wolf River to the proposed Walnut Grove/Kirby Whitten interchange with a heavily landscaped median. Construct a 4 lane divided roadway from the proposed interchange to Mullins Station Road. Construct and/or widen Kirby-Whitten from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from Mullins Station Road to Macon Road. Kirby-Whitten will be constructed with a raised median. The proposed interchange at Walnut Grove Road and Kirby-Whitten and the associated ramps are included in the project. Adjacent pedestrian and bicycle paths will be designed in conjunction with this project. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H New Canada Road [I-40 to US- 70] STP-M Design and Construction of a new four lane divided highway between Interstate 40 (Exit 20) and U.S. Highway 70 (State Route #1). Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 48

52 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table E-3: Status of Local Tennessee Projects in FY TIP (cont d) Project Name Project ID Project Description Status North Second Street [I-40 to US 51] STP-M The project is to improve the North Second Street corridor to a parkway design including right-of-way acquisition, reconstruction of sidewalks, bike route, landscaping, and utility relocation. APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Old Brownsville [Austin Peay to Kirby Whitten] Plough Blvd.[Plough Blvd. Interchange with Winchester Rd.] Poplar (US 72)/Sweetbriar Interchange [Poplar at Sweetbriar] Walnut Grove Road East [Walnut Bend Road to Rocky Point Road] Walnut Grove Road Middle [Kirby/Whitten Pkwy to Germantown Pkwy] Winchester/Perkins Interchange [Winchester at Perkins] Bike and Pedestrian Grouping Signalization Grouping Resurfacing Grouping Bridge Grouping STP-M Construct five lane major arterial. STP-M STP-M STP-M STP-M STP-M STP-M STP-M STP-M STP-M Improve 3,000 feet along Plough-Airways Blvd. south from Brooks Rd. and improve 3,000 feet along Winchester east of original at grade section. The improvements will provide a grade-separated interchange to replace the existing at-grade condition at the Plough- Airways/Winchester Rd. intersection. The final design will maintain the present direct connectors between Plough Blvd. and the airport. the preliminary planning will include coordination with MATA to address future light rail service to the airport Modify the Poplar/Sweetbriar interchange by widening the ramp from Sweetbriar to westbound Poplar Avenue (Ramp B) to two lanes. Poplar will be widened as Project will be completed in this TIP cycle, no carry over. necessary to accommodate the merging of traffic from the new ramp lane. Widen existing four and two lane roadway to six lanes with a median, eliminate sharp curves and realign Rocky Point Road intersection to improve safety. This project will provide wide outside lanes for bikes. Widen existing four lane roadway to six lane parkway with landscaping. This project will have adjacent paths for bikes and pedestrians designed in conjunction with the parkway. Reconstruct interchange to allow for the removal of the center pier in Winchester and construct more travel lanes on Winchester. Project not carried over This grouping will be used to fund for Greenways, Sidewalks, Bicycle Facilities and Amenities, Streescaping, etc. throughout the Tennessee portion of the Memphis MPO area. This grouping will be used to fund for Upgrade, Replace, Improve Traffic Signals and Signal Systems throughout the Tennessee portion of the Memphis MPO area. This grouping will be used to fund road resurfacing and other preventative maintenance throughout the Tennessee portion of the Memphis MPO Planning Area. This grouping will be used to fund bridge replacement, rehabilitation, preservation, systematic repairs & Seismic retrofit projects throughout the Tennessee portion of the Memphis MPO Planning Area. Shelby Farms Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Equine Trails ENH Facilities for pedestrian or bicycles and landscaping or other scenic beautification Project will be completed in this cycle, no carry over 49 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

53 Table E-3: Status of Local Tennessee Projects in FY TIP (cont d) Project Name Project ID Project Description Status Highway 70 at Jetway Rd Improvements (US 70 at Jetway Rd) SR-205 (Airline Road) North Widening (From the Hall Creek bridge at I-40 north to 1,100' north of the Airline - Milton Wilson intersection) Bike and Pedestrian Connector - Phase 2A & B (Memphis- Arlington Road, between Milton Wilson Road and Jetway Avenue) Donelson Farms Parkway (From SR-385 (Future I-269) to Airline Road) SR-57 Widening (Collierville- Arlington Rd/Eastley St to SR 385) Collierville Center Connect Phase 1 (Center Street from South Rowlett to South Street) Germantown Road Realignment (Poplar Pike/ McVay to 1000 Feet South of Poplar) STP-M STP-M ENH TCSP STP-M Widen Highway 70 from 4 lanes to 5 lanes from just east of SR-385 to just west of Airline Road. The widening is to provide for a left turn lane associated with the installation of a traffic control signal, which will not increase roadway capacity. Project includes the installation of a traffic signal at the Highway 70 - Jetway Road intersection. The project includes the widening of SR-205 (Airline Road) from 2 lanes to 5 lanes, with the addition of curb & gutter, drainage improvements, sidewalks, bike lanes and other amenities. The project extends from I- 40 on the south end to 1,100' north of the Airline - Milton Wilson Intersection. This project consists of the design and construction of bike and pedestrian facilities along Memphis-Arlington Fully obligated, project is complete. No carry over between Milton Wilson and Jetway as required to complete the connection between Arlington Elementary and Middle Schools. This project consists of the design and construction of approximately 2,400 linear feet of 2-lanes of the Donelson Farms Parkway. The ultimate roadway is intended to be a 4-lane urban collector with a median, bike and pedestrian facilities. Project involves the widening of SR 57 from an existing two lane rural cross section to a five lane urban cross section. Project scope will include designated bicycle facilities and ADA accessible p destrian improvements. ENH Streetscape and pedestrian improvements STP-M Realignment and construction of a 5 lane road to make Germantown Road continuous through the City of Germantown. The project includes the realignment of West Street and Old Germantown Roads to form an intersection with the Realigned Germantown Road north of the NSRR tracks. As part of the project, the railroad at-grade crossing will be improved to current Project not carried over NSRR standards and Old Germantown Road will be improved from Poplar Pike to the intersection of Old Germantown Road with Germantown Road Realigned. Project scope will include shared auto/bike facilities and ADA accessible pedestrian improvements. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Germantown Road at Wolf River Boulevard Intersection Improvements STP-M Reconstruct intersection of Wolf River Blvd and Germantown Road, with widening and reconstruction of traffic signals on Germantown Road from Brierbrook Road to Wolf Trail Cove. Project not carried over Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 50

54 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A Table E-3: Status of Local Tennessee Projects in FY TIP (cont d) Project Name Project ID Project Description Status I-40 / Riverside Drive Gateway Enhancements (Riverside Drive from Interstate 40, Tennessee Exit 1A ramp to Jefferson Avenue) ENH The landscaping enhancements planned for the I-40 and Riverside Drive gateway consist of tree plantings and ground cover for three sections of the exit area. Trees will be planted along a median strip primarily visible by traffic entering Downtown from westbound I- 40. Another cluster of trees and ground cover will be planted in an exit area median strip that is visible to traffic exiting from both I-40 eastbound and westbound lanes. In addition, landscaping will be replaced adjacent to the Tennessee Visitors Center. A welcome entry sign will be installed at the bottom of the Exit 1A ramp. APPENDIX B APPENDIX C University of Memphis Railroad Pedestrian Project (North of Southern Avenue and south of Walker Avenue; Norfolk Southern rail on south side of University of Memphis campus) Walker Avenue Streetscape (Highland Ave to Brister St) ENH ENH Construction of pedestrian crossings, bollards, signage, landscaping, fencing, and lighting as well as sidewalks and ADA upgrades. Modification of existing roadway to accommodate new streetscape including new curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, lighting, bike lanes, and street parking. Fully obligated, project is complete. No carry over Fully obligated, project is complete. No carry over APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Wolf River Greenway Phase 4 (McLean Ave to Hollywood Street) Walker Avenue Streetscape Phase 2 (Brister St to Patterson St) Beale Street Landing Water Taxi and Dock Connections (Riverside Drive and Beale Street, Memphis, TN) Mainstreet to Mainstreet Multimodal Connector (Henry Avenue at N. Main Street in Memphis, TN to Broadway Avenue at Club Road in West Memphis, AR) Cobblestone Landing Railroad Pedestrian Improvements (Court Ave, Monroe Ave, and Union Ave Railroad Crossings) Navy Road Streetscape and Median (US 51 to Veterans Parkway) Wilkinsville Road (US 51 to Veterans Parkway) Highway 61 Blues Trail ENH ENH FBD mile segment of 10' asphalt trail for multi-purpose use. Modification of existing roadway to accommodate new streetscape including new curb and gutter, sidewalks, landscaping, lighting, bike lanes, and street parking. Design and construction of water taxi service for Wolf River Harbor, to include design and construction of docking connections and the purchase of water taxis. Refloor old Harahan Bridge for bike and pedestrian TIGER IV use and road/street improvements to accommodate bikes. DEMO STP-M Railroad safety improvements to Court Ave, Monroe Ave, and Union Ave. Project also includes ADA upgrades for pedestrians, signage, pedestrian signals, and crossing surfaces. This is the second phase of the Navy Road Streetscape project. It includes the construction of additional medians, paved crosswalks, sidewalk improvements, streetscape improvements, and the realignment of the intersection of Navy and Easley. Project scope will include shared auto/bicycle facilities. 51 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program Project should bid for construction Summer/Fall Potentially carry-over to next TIP. Project not carried over. May 2016 estimated completion Carry-over to next TIP STP-M Extension of a 5 lane road through a newly developing area of the City. This project will create a pedestrian friendly roadway through a mixed use center that will function as the town center and connect to Veterans Parkway. Project scope will include designated bicycle facilities and ADA accessible pedestrian improvements. Trail marker signage, way finding signage, historic site ENH designation signage, blues music crosswalks, gateway Project not carried over art projects and landscaping along Highway 61.

55 Table E-3: Status of Local Tennessee Projects in FY TIP (cont d) Project Name Project ID Project Description Status Naval Facility Connector (Astoria Avenue, South of Navy Road to Homet Avenue) Houston Levee Road Widening (Walnut Grove Road to Wolf River Bridge) Walnut Grove Road Widening (Rocky Point to Houston Levee) Macon Road Widening (Berryhill to Houston Levee) Elvis Presley-Brooks Roadscape Project Transportation Alternatives Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Grouping Oakland Transportation Master Plan FLAP STP-M STP-M STP-M To make improvements to a 0.5 mile a section of Astoria Avenue by reconstructing the existing two-lane roadway to improve the existing pavement conditions, the horizontal and vertical geometry and to provide access for bicycles and pedestrians. A regional detention basin, West of the project and South of Dakar Street will be constructed for all parcels. This project improves Houston Levee Road by widening the segment from Walnut Grove Road to the Wolf River Bridge from two to four lanes. The roadway segment will include a median and landscaping. Project scope will include designated bicycle facilities and ADA accessible pedestrian improvements. This project widens Walnut Grove Road from two to six lanes from Rocky Point Road to Houston Levee Road with a bridge over Gray's Creek. Project scope will include designated bicycle facilities and ADA accessible pedestrian improvements. This project provides improvements for widening of Macon Road from two to four lanes from Berryhill Road to Houston Levee Road with a bridge over Gray's Creek. Project scope will include designated bicycle facilities and ADA accessible pedestrian improvements. ENH Pedestrian & Landscape Improvements PE-D will be obligated this FY, (no-carry-over). No additional phases in next TIP. Project Completed TAP This grouping will be used to fund the Transportation Alternatives Program, which provides funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; recreational trail program projects; safe routes to school projects; and projects for the planning, design or construction of boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways under FAST Act throughout the Tennessee portion of the Memphis MPO Planning Area. SRTS STP-L This grouping funds annual Safe Routes to School grant awards to Tennessee MPO jurisdictions. Amounts may be amended or adjusted as the Governor awards new grants. Safe Routes to School programs represented a good mix of educational activities, major projects such as sidewalk segments and shared-use paths and minor improvements such as sign packages, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals. Project Completed This project will consist of a broad study of the transportation system for the Town of Oakland. The intent of the study is to make recommendations on how to create a more complete multimodal transportation system for the Town of Oakland. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 52

56 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Table E-4: Status of Local Mississippi Projects in FY TIP Local MS Projects Project Name Project ID Project Description Status Widen existing rural two-lane road to 5- Craft Road [Goodman Road (MS 302) to Project fully obligated, not MS-LSTP lane urban cross-section. A striped bike U.S. 78] carried over. land will be provided. Getwell Road [Goodman Road to Tennessee State Line] Stateline Road Bridge Getwell Road (Star Landing Road to Church Road) Stateline Road Pedestrian Project (Highway 51 to Northwest Drive and Northwest Drive to Municipal Center MS-LSTP MS-LSTP MS-LSTP MS-LSTP I-55 / I-69 Interchange at Nail Road MS-LSTP Getwell Road (Star Landing Road to Pleasant Hill Road) Commerce Street Extension (to Jaybird Road) Tulane Road Connector (From Approx. 1800' north of Goodman Rd to Pentail Dr.) Resurfacing Grouping Signalization Grouping Transportation Alternatives MS-LSTP MS-LSTP Widening existing two lane roadway WO / curbs and stormdralns to a (two mile) five lane typical section W I curbs Under construction. Not carried over. and stormdrains and a (one-quarter mile) seven lane typical section W / curbs and stormdrains. Replacement of the existing structurally deficient bridge by replacing the timber supports with a new concrete box culvert. Widen existing variable width road to a four-lane divided typical section with curbs and storm drains. A 10' wide multiuse Bike-Ped lane will be provided. Install sidewalks (5' wide) on both sides of Stateline Road from Highway 51 to Northwest Drive and Northwest Drive to library/police dept/city hall. I-55 / I-69 Interchange at Nail Road Hydraulic Study Project not carried over Widen existing two lane road to a fourlane divided typical section with curb and Project not carried over gutter and sidewalks. New 2-lane road, with roadbed for future expansion to four-line divded MS-LSTP New 2-lane road with curb and gutter. Project not carried over MS-LSTP MS-LSTP MS-TAP This grouping will be used to fund road resurfacing and other preventative maintenance throughout the Mississippi portion of the Memphis MPO area. This grouping will be used to fund for Upgrade, Replace, Improve Traffic Signals and Signal Systems throughout the Mississippi portion of the Memphis MPO area. This grouping will be used to fund the Transportation Alternatives Program, which provides funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives, including on- and off-road pedestrian and bicycle facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, community improvement activities, and environmental mitigation; recreational trail program projects; safe routes to school projects; and projects for the planning, design or construction of boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways under FAST Act throughout the Mississippi portion of the Memphis MPO Planning Area. 53 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

57 Table E-5: Status of Tennessee CMAQ Projects in FY TIP TN CMAQ Projects Project Name Project ID Project Description Status Congestion Management Program CMAQ Mile Bike/Ped Project CMAQ Shelby County Greenline (Farm Road to Cordova) Diesel Emission Reduction Strategies Grouping Air Quality Outreach Memphis Heavy Duty CNG Truck Deployment Traffic Signal Equipment Replacement (Walnut Grove from I-240 to City Limits) I-40 Corridor/Shelby Farms Transit Service Improvements CMAQ This project is the continuation of a very effective program to provide improvements to intersections throughout Shelby County, including the installation of coordinated signal systems, vehicle detection improvements, isolated signal improvements, and isolated unsignalized intersection improvements in accordance with the approved Shelby County Congestion Management Program. Over the four year period of this TIP, it is expected that improvements will be made to over 100 intersections. Installation of approximately 50 miles of bicycle facilities along Memphis city streets. This project is a continuation of the existing Shelby Farms Greenline, beginning at Farm Road and continuing east 4.3 miles to the Old Cordova Train Station utilizing inactive CSX Railroad right-of-way. CMAQ Projects to reduce diesel emissions CMAQ Carry over remaining balance to next TIP Project will be completed, not carried over Project completed The Memphis and Shelby County Health Department will demonstrate the air quality benefits of improved public awareness through establishing a major public education and outreach campaign on clean air. The goal of this project is to educate the public, area leaders and businesses about connections among Project completed trip making and transprotation alternatives, traffic congestion and air quality. This campaign will help the Shelby-Crittenden nonattainment area reduce emissions and congestion by inducing drivers to change their transportation choices. As part of Memphis Light Gas and Water s Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) market development, Dillon Transport, Inc. has committed to a publicprivate partnership to invest in the conversion of 20 heavy duty trucks of their fleet to CNG vehicles in the Memphis area. Dillon plans to use these trucks to CMAQ Project completed transport goods throughout the state of Tennessee. This commitment creates an anchor customer for Memphis Light Gas and Water s South CNG Fueling Center and will significantly contribute to emissions reduction and better air quality in the Memphis and Shelby County area. CMAQ CMAQ This project provides for improvements to the Walnut Grove Road corridor by upgrading obsolete signal equipment with new ITS technologies enabling interconnected operation of traffic signals within the project limits. MATA plans to provide transit service on three new routes and to two new park and ride locations under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program. The three routes include the I-40 Corridor Circulator, the Route 34 Express and the Shelby Farms Circulator. The two new park and ride lots will serve the Route 53 Express-Greenline and the Route 34 Express-Agricenter. Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 54 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H

58 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Table E-5: Status of Tennessee CMAQ Projects in FY TIP (cont d) TDOT HELP Truck Program Expansion Commute Options Travel Demand Management Initiative Central Station Phase 2 Redevelopment (Main Street and G.E. Patterson) Memphis Area Rideshare Project Shelby Farms Greenline: Cordova Station to Lenow CMAQ CMAQ CMAQ CMAQ CMAQ New Transit Service/Operating Assistance CMAQ Electric Rail Trolleys CMAQ To expand the existing TDOT Freeway Service Patrol Program by acquiring six new HELP trucks, adding six operators and adding/ expanding routes to provide coverage and services during peak hours in the Memphis-Shelby County area. Develop employer program to reduce drive-alone commuting and increase use of transit, bicycling, rideshare and walking among employees and students. Develop marketing and outreach tools, pilot strategies with six employers during grant period, and establish replicable program for ongoing use. Funding for the public infrastructure improvements at Central Station to improve the multimodal functionality of the project and increase the utilization of transit, biking, and walking as alternative modes of transportation. Major components will include a new trolley station, transit connector concourse, and other pedestrian and bike-friendly streetscape improvements. This project will provide funds to continue the Memphis Area Rideshare Program (vanpooling and carpooling). Extend the Shelby Farms Greenline from the old Cordova Train Station to the TVA Substation on Carry over remaining Lenow Road along an inactive CSX Railroad right-ofway. The proposed improvements will convert the balance to next TIP. PE- N obligated this TIP. railbed to an asphalt bicycle/pedestrian trail approximately 2.5 miles in length. New Transit Service for four proposed routes that will expand bus service to employment centers in the Memphis area. The four routes include: (1) Wolfchase Connector, (2) Airways Transit Center Ex- press, (3) Getwell Connector, and (4) Airport Shuttle Express. Purchase of three new electric rail trolleys for MATA's trolley system. APPENDIX H 55 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

59 Table E-6: Status of Transit Projects in FY TIP Transit Projects Project Name Project ID Project Description Status ADA Paratransit Services Advanced Public Transportation Systems Phase II Bus Facility Improvements Computer Hardware and Software Preventative Maintenance Rail Facility Improvements MATA covers costs associated with a portion of its MATA plus paratransit service under this line item. Advanced Public Transportation Systems apply advanced technologies to address public transportation needs. These systems may include, communication systems, computer-aided dispatch/ automated vehicle location (CAD/AVL) devices, automated passenger counters (APC), automated vehicle announcement (AVA) systems, automated vehicle health monitoring systems (AVM), security cameras, fare collection systems, mobility management software, project administration, and other management systems. Includes various routine improvements to bus-related facilities, such as construction and repairs to maintenance and operations facilities and passenger facilities. Typical items include roof repairs, equipment repairs, painting, security elements, and HVAC modifications. These systems are used to maintain accurate records and keep various department tasks such as finance, purchasing, scheduling, transportation, and employee benefits operational Preventive Maintenance provides funds for inspections and routine maintenance needed to maximize the efficiency and service life of MATA's capital assets, including fixed route fleet, demand response fleet, rail fleet, and facilities. This project includes various routine improvements to rail related facilities. Such improvements include repairs to tracks, switches, crossties, the catenary system, bridges, substations, stations and the Trolley Maintenance and Storage Facility. Service Vehicles Periodic service vehicle replacement. These vehicles comprise a portion of the non-revenue fleet for the transportation, maintenance and other MATA departments. MATA plans to replace up to seventeen ser vice vehicles in 2011 and eight in each year following. The service life of theses vehicles is typically four years or 100,000 miles. Transit Centers Job Access/Reverse Commute MATA plans to construct a system of transit centers in various locations in suburban areas. Bus routes in each area will be adjusted to serve the centers and schedules will be adjusted to minimize waiting time for transfers. MATA plans to implement new bus service in the northeastern part of Memphis along Goodlett Farms Parkway as a Jobs Access/Reverse Commute (JARC) project. Not carried over Not carried over TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment Includes various purchases and replacement of MATA's capital assets such as furniture, office equipment or site furnishings. Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 56

60 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Table E-6: Status of Transit Projects in FY TIP (cont d) Associated Transit Improvements Preventative Maintenance Rail Only Rail Facility Improvements Bus Facility Improvements Capital Equipment Capital Equipment Bus Facility Improvements Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program Includes various projects designed to enhance public transportation service or use and that is physically or functionally related to transit. Eligible projects include: historic preservation, rehabilitation and operation of historic public transportation buildings, structures, and facilities intended for use in public transportation service; bus shelters; landscaping and streetscaping, including benches, trash receptacles, and street lights; pedestrian access and walkways; bicycle access or storage equipment; signage; or enhanced access for persons with disabilities to public transportation. Preventive Maintenance provides funds for materials and supplies, inspections and routine maintenance needed to maximize the efficiency and service life of MATA's capital assets, including MATA's rail fleet, service vehicles, infrastructure and facilities. This project includes various routine improvements to rail related facilities. Such improvements include repairs to tracks, switches, crossties, the catenary system, bridges, substations, stations and the Trolley Maintenance and Storage Facility. Includes various routine improvements to bus-related facilities such as construction and repairs to maintenance, operations and passenger facilities. Typical items include roof repairs, equipment repairs, painting, security elements, HVAC modifications, paving, etc. This project provides funding for the purchase of 2 Rear Lift Conversion Vans, 1 Cutaway Minibus, and 1 Center Aisle Raised Roof Passenger Van using Section 5310 funds. This capital equipment has been awarded to the Shelby Residential & Vocational Services, Inc. This project provides funding for the purchase of 1 Passenger Bus using Section 5310 funds. This capital equipment has been awarded to the Goodwill Homes Community Services, Inc. Includes various routine improvements to bus-related facilities such as construction and repairs to maintenance, operations and passenger facilities. Typical items include roof repairs, equipment repairs, painting, security elements, HVAC modifications, paving, etc. MATA plans to use Section 5310 funds for eligible operating projects under the Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program. Not carried over Not carried over Not carried over APPENDIX H Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program MATA plans to use Section 5310 funds for eligible operating projects under the Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program. Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program MATA plans to use Section 5310 funds for Project Administration costs associated with administering projects under the Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program. 57 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

61 Table E-6: Status of Transit Projects in FY TIP (cont d) Bus Operations and Maintenance Facility Fixed Route Buses Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program Bus Facility Improvements Fixed Route Buses Paratransit Vehicles MATA completed a feasibility study in 2012 which recommended gradual relocation of MATA's existing Bus Operations, Maintenance and Administration functions from 1370 Levee Road to another site as funding permits. The existing facility was built on a former landfill and continues to sink causing numerous problems that are ex- pected to worsen in the future. Funding is programmed in FY2016 for land acquisition and in FY2017 for the design and engineering. This project provides funding for the purchase of up to 12 buses between FY2014 and FY2017 using Section 5339 funds. These buses generally have a service life of 12 years or 500,000 miles, whichever comes first, and will replace up to 12 diesel buses that have met their useful service life. All buses will be replaced in accordance with FTA's currently rolling stock policy. MDOT plans to use Section 5310 funds for eligible operating projects under the Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program. MDOT plans to use Section 5310 funds for eligible operating projects under the Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program. Includes various routine improvements to bus-related facilities such as construction and repairs to maintenance, operations and passenger facilities. Typical items include roof repairs, equipment repairs, painting, security elements, HVAC modifications, paving, etc. This project provides funding for the purchase of up to 12 buses between FY 2014 and FY 2017 using Section 5307 funds. These buses generally have a service life of 12 years or 500,000 miles, whichever comes first, and will replace up to 12 diesel buses that have met their useful service life. All buses will be replaced in accordance with FTA's currently rolling stock policy. Project not carried over This project provides funding for the purchase of paratransit vehicles between FY 2014 and FY 2017 using Section 5307 funds as follows: up to six in FY 2014; up to six in FY 2015; up to six in FY 2016, and up to six in FY These vehicles will replace up to 24 diesel paratransit buses that have met their useful life. All vehicles will be replaced in accordance with FTA's currently rolling stock policy. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 58

62 This page is intentionally left blank

63 APPENDIX-F Public Involvement Process Table F-1: Local Jurisdiction Public Meetings for FY TIP Projects Jurisdiction Project Date Location Address Arlington Bartlett Collierville Germantown Lakeland Memphis Donelson Farms Parkway Highway 70 at Jetway Road Improvements SR-205 (Airline Road) North Widening Old Brownsville SR-57 Widening 3-Dec-12 Arlington Town Hall 7-Dec-15 Arlington Town Hall 3-Dec-12 Arlington Town Hall 3-Dec-12 Arlington Town Hall 5854 Airline Road, Arlington, TN Airline Road, Arlington, TN Airline Road, Arlington, TN Airline Road, Arlington, TN Mar-05 Rivercrest Elementary 4825 Rivercrest Ln., Bartlett TN Dec-12 Bartlett City Hall 6400 Stage Road, Bartlett, TN Jan-16 Bartlett City Hall 6400 Stage Road, Bartlett, TN Oct-10 The Historic Depot on the Square 125 N. Rowlett Street Collierville, TN 12-Jan-16 Town of Collierville Town Hall 500 Poplar View Parkway Shelby Drive Widening 12-Jan-16 Town of Collierville Town Hall 500 Poplar View Parkway SR-175 (Shelby Drive) 12-Jan-16 Town of Collierville Town Hall 500 Poplar View Parkway Germantown Road at Wolf River Boulevard Intersection Improvements New Canada Rd 13-Jan-16 Economic & Community Development Office 1920 South Germantown Road, Germantown, TN Apr-05 Center Point Church 3570 Canada Rd., Lakeland TN Dec-12 Lakeland City Hall U.S. Hwy 70, Lakeland, TN Jan-16 Lakeland City Hall U.S. Hwy 70, Lakeland, TN Aug-04 Bert Ferguson Community Center 8505 Trinity Rd., Memphis, TN Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Forest Hill Irene 3-Jan-13 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library Walnut Grove Rd., Memphis, TN- 26-Mar-02 Agricenter International Kirby Whitten Pkwy (Shelby 3030 Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Jan-13 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library Farms Parkway) Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Holmes Road East 12-Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 3527 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Holmes Road West 12-Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library Poplar Avenue 12-Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 3030 Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 60

64 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS Table F-1 (continued): Local Jurisdiction Public Meetings for Current FY TIP Projects Jurisdiction Project Date Location Address 26-Mar-02 Agricenter International 7777 Walnut Grove Rd., Memphis, TN Walnut Grove Road Middle 3-Jan-13 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 3030 Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 3030 Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Apr-10 Whitehaven Community Center 4318 Graceland Drive, Memphis, TN Elvis Presley Blvd 3-Jan-13 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 3030 Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Memphis 12-Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 3030 Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Union Avenue Complete Street Poplar Avenue Complete Street Walnut Grove Road East 12-Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 12-Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 12-Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 3030 Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Poplar Ave, Memphis TN APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Millington Shelby County Shelby Dr. Extension and Widening Navy Road Streetscape and Median Wilkinsville Road Raleigh Millington Rd. at 385 Intersection Improvements Houston Levee Road Widening Walnut Grove Road Widening 12-Jan-16 Benjamin L Hooks Central Library 3030 Poplar Ave, Memphis TN Feb-13 Millington City Hall 7930 Nelson Road, Millington, TN Jan-16 Millington City Hall 7930 Nelson Road, Millington, TN Feb-13 Millington City Hall 7930 Nelson Road, Millington, TN Jan-16 Millington City Hall 7930 Nelson Road, Millington, TN Jan-16 Millington City Hall 7930 Nelson Road, Millington, TN Jan Nov-14 9-Jan-13 9-Jul-15 Memphis & Shelby County Code Enforcement Training Room Memphis & Shelby County Code Enforcement Training Room Memphis & Shelby County Code Enforcement Training Room Memphis & Shelby County Code Enforcement Training Room 6465 Mullins Station, Memphis, TN Mullins Station, Memphis, TN Mullins Station, Memphis, TN Memphis & Shelby County Code Enforcement Training Room APPENDIX H Hacks Cross Road Improvements 11-Jan-16 Memphis & Shelby County Code Enforcement Training Room 6465 Mullins Station, Memphis, TN MATA Transfer Facilities-Multimodal Connections 26-Jan-16 Benjamin Hooks Library 3030 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, TN Fixed Route Buses 26-Jan-16 Benjamin Hooks Library 3030 Poplar Avenue, Memphis, TN Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

65 Table F-1 (continued): Local Jurisdiction Public Meetings for Current FY TIP Projects Jurisdiction Project Date Location Address Desoto County Commerce Street Extension 4-Dec-15 Desoto County Administration Building Hernando McIngvale Road 5-Jan-16 Hernando City Hall Olive Branch Pleasant Hill Road Widening 14-Jan-16 Southaven Getwell Road Olive Branch Municipal Court Room 14-Apr-05 Southaven City Hall 365 Losher Street #350, Hernando, MS W. Commerce Street, Hernando, MS Highland Street, Olive Branch, MS 8710 Northwest Dr., Southaven MS Jan-16 Southaven City Hall Southaven City Hall Nail Road Extension 8-Jan-16 Southaven City Hall Southaven City Hall Table F-2:Public Meetings for 30-day Review and Comment Period FY TIP County Date Location Address Shelby, TN July 20, 2016; 12-1:00 PM MATA Central Station 545 South Main Streeet, Memphis, TN Shelby, TN July 20, 2016; 5:30-6:30 PM Bartlett City Hall 6400 Stage Road, Bartlett, TN Fayette, TN July 19, 2016; 10-11:00 AM Oakland City Hall 170 Doss Circle, Oakland, TN Desoto, MS July 19, 2016; 12-1:00 PM DeSoto County Administration Building 365 Losher Street, Hernando, MS Marshall, MS July 19, 2016; 10-11:00 AM Byhalia Town Hall 161 Mississippi 309, Byhalia, MS TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 62

66 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure F-3: FY TIP Handout (English Page 1) APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A 63 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

67 Figure F-3: FY TIP Handout (English Page 2) TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 64

68 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure F-3: FY TIP Handout (Spanish Page 1) APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A 65 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

69 Figure F-3: FY TIP Handout (Spanish Page 2) TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 66

70 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure F-4: FY TIP Public Meeting Flyer (English Page 1) APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A 67 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

71 Figure F-4: FY TIP Public Meeting Flyer (English Page 2) TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 68

72 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure F-4: FY TIP Public Meeting Flyer (Spanish Page 1) APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A 69 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

73 Figure F-4: FY TIP Public Meeting Flyer (Spanish Page 2) TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 70

74 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure F-4: FY TIP Public Meeting TPB Handout APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A 71 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

75 Figure F-5: FY TIP Comments Received Comment Number MPO Staff Reviewed Comment Date Received 1 Mitchell 7/19/2016 Bob Kendall Citizen Figure F-6: FY TIP Public Notice: FY Transportation Improvement Program Comment Log Citizen/ Contact Organization Comment - Summary MPO Response Great presentation! Thank you for explaining in a way the New Guy could understand very helpful! I look forward to working with you. MPO Staff Responded to Comments NA NA NA Changes Made to Document TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 72

76 TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure F-7: FY TIP Public Video Presentation APPENDIX C APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX B APPENDIX A The video was embedded on the MPO s website and viewed 73 times during the public review period. APPENDIX H The video link was shared on DeSoto County Government s Facebook Page. 73 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

77 Figure F-7: FY TIP Public Video Presentation The video link was shared on the MPO s Twitter site. TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 74

78 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Figure G-1: Local Tennessee Road Project Rankings APPENDIX-G FY Local STBG Projects & Rankings Tennessee Road Projects Project Name Agency TIP # RTP # Elvis Presley Blvd Memphis ENH Kirby/Whitten Parkway (Shelby Farms Parkway) Memphis STP-M Walnut Grove Road Widening Shelby County STP-M Airline Road North Widening Arlington STP-M Germantown Rd at Wolf River Blvd Intersection Germantown STP-M Hacks Cross Rd Improvements Shelby County STBG-M SR-57 Widening Collierville STP-M Poplar Avenue Memphis STBG-M Union Avenue Complete Street Memphis STBG-M Houston Levee Road Widening Shelby County STP-M Hwy 70 at Jetway Rd Improvements Arlington STP-M Navy Road Streetscape Phase II Millington STP-M NA 57 Poplar Avenue Complete Street Memphis STBG-M Walnut Grove Rd Middle Memphis STP-M Holmes Road East Memphis STP-M NA 54 Holmes Road West Memphis STP-M NA 53 Forest Hill Irene Memphis STP-M Transfer Centers and Super Stops MATA STBG-M NA 51 Walnut Grove Rd East Memphis STP-M Raleigh Millington Rd at 385 Intersection Improvements Millington STBG-M NA 49 Shelby Dr Extension and Widening Memphis/ Port STBG-M & Total Points Old Brownsville Rd Bartlett STP-M APPENDIX H Shelby Dr Widening Collierville STBG-M Shelby Dr Widening (SR-175) Collierville STBG-M Fixed Route Vehicles MATA STBG-M NA 43 Donelson Farms Parkway Arlington TCSP New Canada Road Lakeland STP-M Wilkinsville Road Millington STP-M Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

79 Figure G-2: Local Mississippi Road Project Rankings Mississippi Road Projects Project Name Agency TIP # RTP # Total Points McIngvale Widening and Realignment Hernando MS-LSTBG Getwell Road Widening Southaven MS-LSTP Nail Road Extension Southaven MS-LSTP Commerce Street Extension DeSoto County MS-LSTP Figure G-3: Local Tennessee Resurfacing Project Rankings Tennessee Resurfacing Projects Project Name Agency Total Points Memphis Resurfacing (FY TIP) Memphis NA Park (Goodlett to Mt. Moriah) Memphis 40 Park (Mt. Moriah to Ridgeway) Memphis 40 Park (Semmes to Goodlett) Memphis 40 Democrat (Tchulahoma to Lamar) Memphis 39 Florida (South Parkway to Belz) Memphis 38 Mendenhall (Winchester to Raines) Memphis 38 Millbranch (Riverbrook to City Limit) Memphis 38 Graham (Goodlett to Summer) Memphis 37 Mississippi (Crump to Danny Thomas) Memphis 37 Highland (Summer to Macon) Memphis 36 Mendenhall (Raines to Shelby) Memphis 36 Stratford (Macon to Summer) Memphis 35 Sycamore View (Macon to Summer) Memphis 35 Brother Blvd (Stage to Germantown Rd) Bartlett 34 Knight Arnold (Cherry to Lamar) Memphis 34 Wolf River Blvd (Stillwind to Brackenshire Lane) Collierville 33 Yale Road (Kirby Whitten to Brother) Bartlett 32 Harbor Avenue (Buoy to Riverside) Memphis/ Port 32 Bartlett (Summer to Raleigh LaGrange) Memphis 32 Central (Cooper to Lamar) Memphis 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Horn Lake (Wyatt to Holmes) Memphis 31 Winchester Mill/ Overlay (Forest Hill-Irene to Eastern City Limits) Germantown 30 Huff n Puff Road (FY TIP) Lakeland 30 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 76

80 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS Figure G-4: Local Mississippi Resurfacing Project Rankings Project Name Mississippi Resurfacing Projects Agency Church Road Southaven 34 Hacks Cross Road (FY TIP) Olive Branch 33 Byhalia Road (FY TIP) DeSoto County 28 McIngvale Road (FY TIP) Hernando 26 Davidson Road (FY TIP) Olive Branch 26 Horn Lake Road Horn Lake 25 Byhalia Road (FY TIP) Hernando 25 MS 304 (FY TIP) DeSoto County 24 Commerce Road West (FY TIP) Hernando 24 Red Banks Road (FY TIP) DeSoto County 22 State Line Road: Crumpler to 178 (FY TIP) Olive Branch 21 State Line Road: Davidson to Malone (FY TIP) Olive Branch 19 Total Points Figure G-5: Local Tennessee Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Rankings APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Tennessee Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Project Name Agency Sidewalk Program (FY TIP) Memphis 26 Chelsea Ave Greenline (FY TIP) Memphis 48 Jefferson Ave Cycle Track (FY TIP) Memphis 45 Overton Park Cooper Street Entrance (FY TIP) Memphis 45 Shelby Farms Greenline Bridge (FY TIP) Memphis 41 South Memphis Greenline (FY TIP) Memphis 39 Wolf River Greenway Phase 15 (FY TIP) Memphis 37 Bike Routes - 25 Miles (FY TIP) Memphis 35 Fletcher Creek Greenway Phase 2 Bartlett 32 North Parkway Sidewalks (FY TIP) Memphis 29 Collierville Center Connect Phase 2 (FY TIP) Collierville NA Germantown Greenway (FY TIP) Germantown NA Total Points APPENDIX H Figure G-6: Local Mississippi Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Rankings Mississippi Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Project Name Agency Johnson Creek Extension DeSoto County 20 Snowden Pedestrian Path and Bike project Southaven 19 Stateline Road Pedestrian Project (FY TIP) Southaven 19 Total Points 77 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

81 Figure G-7: Local Tennessee Signalization Project Rankings Tennessee Signalization Projects Project Name Agency Total Points STP Isolated Signal Project - Group 1 (TN PIN# FY TIP) Memphis NA STP Isolated Signal Project - Group 2 (TN PIN# FY TIP) Memphis NA STP Isolated Signal Project - Group 3 (TN PIN# FY TIP) Memphis NA Macon and Mullins Station Memphis 39 Brooks and Springbrook Memphis 38 Dexter and Germantown Parkway Memphis 37 Raines and Getwell Memphis 35 Trinity and Walnut Bend Memphis 32 Byhalia Road and Shelby Drive Collierville 31 North Parkway and Ayers Memphis 31 Poplar and Kirby Parkway Germantown 30 Delano and N. Watkins Memphis 30 Hwy 64 and Berryhill Memphis 30 Peabody andcleveland Memphis 30 Poplar and Whitestation Memphis 30 Poplar and Hollywood Memphis 29 Summer and Hollywood Memphis 29 Walnut Grove and Goodlett Memphis 29 Poplar and Collins Memphis 28 Summer and Holmes Memphis 28 Summer and Pope Memphis 28 Shelby Drive and Sycamore Road Collierville 27 Quince and Mt. Moriah Memphis 27 Quince and Perkins Memphis 27 Hacks Cross Road and Poplar Pike Germantown 26 Crump and Walnut Georgia Memphis 26 Jefferson and Cleveland Memphis 26 Lamar and Bellevue Memphis 26 McLemore and Mississippi Memphis 26 North Parkway and University Memphis 25 Union and Manassas Memphis 25 Poplar Pike and Germantown Arthur Germantown 24 Poplar and Tucker Memphis 24 Poplar and Manassas Memphis 23 Union and Marshall /Myrtle Memphis 23 Figure G-8: Local Mississippi Signalization Project Rankings TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX D APPENDIX H Mississippi Signalization Projects Project Name Agency Total Points Hwy. 51 & Robinson Street/ Pleasant Hill Road (FY TIP) Hernando 32 Bethel Road and Business Center Drive (FY TIP) Olive Branch 25 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 78

82 APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D Figure G-9: Local Tennessee Bridge Project Rankings Tennessee Bridge Project Rankings Project Name Agency Plough and Winchester (FY TIP) Memphis 42 Raleigh Millington Bridge/Big Creek (FY TIP) Millington 38 Brooks Road Days Creek (FY TIP) Memphis 38 Sam Cooper Bridge Repairs (PIN # ) (FY TIP) Memphis 38 Poplar Ave. Culvert Replacements Phase 4 Germantown 35 Old Brownsville Road Bridge Replacement over Buckhead Creek/ Franks Branch (FY TIP) Bartlett 26 Mitchell Road and ICRR (FY TIP) Memphis 27 Graham and Sam Cooper Memphis 25 White Station and Sam Cooper Memphis 25 Channel 3 Drive over Riverside Memphis 24 High Point Terrace and Sam Cooper Memphis 19 Monroe and Old Southern RR Memphis 18 Figure G-10: Local Mississippi Bridge Project Rankings Mississippi Bridge Project Rankings Project Name Agency Stateline Road Bridge Replacement (FY TIP) Olive Branch 33 Total Points Total Points APPENDIX H 79 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

83 APPENDIX-H Statewide Grouping Descriptions TDOT TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 80

84 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix H Continued: Statewide Grouping Descriptions TDOT APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A 81 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

85 Appendix H Continued: Statewide Grouping Descriptions TDOT TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 82

86 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix H Continued: Statewide Grouping Descriptions TDOT APPENDIX H APPENDIX G APPENDIX F APPENDIX E APPENDIX D APPENDIX C APPENDIX B APPENDIX A 83 Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program

87 Appendix H Continued: Statewide Grouping Descriptions TDOT TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G APPENDIX H Memphis MPO FY Transportation Improvement Program 84

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century MAP-21

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century MAP-21 Mark Newland Transportation Finance Manager FHWA Indiana Division Purdue Road School March 6, 2013 Agenda Review changes between SAFETEA-LU and MAP-21.

More information

P.L Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act

P.L Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act P.L. 114-94 Fixing America s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act Key Highway Provisions and Freight Provisions Dan Walston Transportation Planner FHWA PA Division 2 FAST Act Signed by President Obama on

More information

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) And Beyond

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) And Beyond Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP-21) And Beyond Janet Oakley Director of Director of American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials MAP-21Key highlights Funding

More information

Federal-aid 101 A Financial Overview. Mark Newland FHWA, Financial Manager Purdue Road School, 2014

Federal-aid 101 A Financial Overview. Mark Newland FHWA, Financial Manager Purdue Road School, 2014 Federal-aid 101 A Financial Overview. Mark Newland FHWA, Financial Manager Purdue Road School, 2014 Objectives for Federal-aid 101 Provide an Overview of: What federal-aid funding is and where it comes

More information

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS THE FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT SUMMARY HR th CONGRESS

NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS THE FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT SUMMARY HR th CONGRESS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS THE FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT SUMMARY HR 22 114 th CONGRESS Table of Contents DIVISION A SURFACE TRANSPORTATION... 2 TITLE I FEDERAL-AID

More information

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION NO. 2018-12 RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN: 2017-2020 WHEREAS, the Southeastern

More information

Multimodal Freight Transportation Policy Overview

Multimodal Freight Transportation Policy Overview Multimodal Freight Transportation Policy Overview Tiffany Julien U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Transportation Specialist Tiffany.julien@dot.gov Fixing America s Surface

More information

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports

MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports MAP 21 Freight Provisions and Seaports September 20, 2012 American Association of Port Authorities 703.684.5700 www.aapa-ports.org 3 New Freight Eligibility in Core Highway Formula Programs Surface Transportation

More information

MOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE:

MOBILITY 2045: A FOCUS ON TRANSPORTATION CHOICE: Mobility 2045: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas is the defining vision for the multimodal transportation system in the Dallas- Fort Worth Metropolitan Planning Area. The plan,

More information

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth

MAP-21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Creates jobs and supports economic growth MAP-21 themes Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems Creates jobs and supports economic growth Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda Simplifies and focuses the Federal

More information

Addendum 1: Performance Measures

Addendum 1: Performance Measures Addendum 1: 2 Addendum Livability 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 3 Federal Requirements... 3 MPO Measure Targets... 4 2.0 Safety Measure Targets... 9 3.0 Transit

More information

Freight Provisions in the FAST ACT

Freight Provisions in the FAST ACT Freight Provisions in the FAST ACT F I X I N G A M E R I C A S S U R FA C E T R A N S P O R TAT I O N A C T H. R. 2 2. E N R O L L E D D E C E M B E R 4, 2 0 1 5 I N I T I A L R E V I E W FAST Act 5 year

More information

Addendum #3 to the Regional Transportation Plan

Addendum #3 to the Regional Transportation Plan Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Addendum #3 to the Regional Transportation Plan Effective November 21, 2018 Nashville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 138 Second Avenue North Nashville,

More information

congestion management process

congestion management process congestion management process c o r p u s c h r i s t i m e t r o p o l i t a n p l a n n i n g o r g a n i z a t i o n Corpus Christi Metropolitan Planning Organization 602 N. Staples Street, Suite 300

More information

LTAP News. On July 6, 2012, President Obama INSIDE. MAP-21 and California Implementation SPRING 2013

LTAP News. On July 6, 2012, President Obama INSIDE. MAP-21 and California Implementation SPRING 2013 LTAP News SPRING 2013 MAP-21 and California Implementation On July 6, 2012, President Obama signed Public Law (P.L.) 112-141, surface transportation authorizing legislation Moving Ahead for Progress in

More information

Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN

Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN Prepared for the Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Endorsed by the Executive Policy Committee of the Rapid City Area

More information

ADDENDUM 1: PERFORMANCE MEASURES

ADDENDUM 1: PERFORMANCE MEASURES ADDENDUM 1: PERFORMANCE MEASURES Updated 11.15.2018 1) Introduction Performance measurement provides various agencies with a better ability to identify and mitigate issues with their respective networks.

More information

Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN

Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization OPERATIONS PLAN Prepared for the Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Endorsed by the Executive Policy Committee of the Rapid City Area

More information

Appendix E-1. FDOT MPO Program Management Handbook. (Excerpts)

Appendix E-1. FDOT MPO Program Management Handbook. (Excerpts) Appendix E-1 FDOT MPO Program Management Handbook (Excerpts) TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 4 Long-Range Transportation Plan Section Page 4.1 PURPOSE... 4-2 4.2 AUTHORITY... 4-2 4.3 SCOPE... 4-2 4.4 REFERENCES...

More information

CC. Ms. Whitney Britt, Local Programs Development Office, TDOT Mr. Nate Brugler, Local Programs Development Office, TDOT Mr. Kwabena Aboayge (KB),

CC. Ms. Whitney Britt, Local Programs Development Office, TDOT Mr. Nate Brugler, Local Programs Development Office, TDOT Mr. Kwabena Aboayge (KB), CC. Ms. Whitney Britt, Local Programs Development Office, TDOT Mr. Nate Brugler, Local Programs Development Office, TDOT Mr. Kwabena Aboayge (KB), Long Range Planning Division, TDOT Mr. Alan Jones, Long

More information

AASHTO Summary and Analysis of the Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy (DRIVE) Act August 28, 2015

AASHTO Summary and Analysis of the Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy (DRIVE) Act August 28, 2015 AASHTO Summary and Analysis of the Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy (DRIVE) Act August 28, 2015 OVERVIEW On July 30, 2015, led by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Environment

More information

MAP-21 DIVISION A FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS AND HIGHWAY SAFETY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS

MAP-21 DIVISION A FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS AND HIGHWAY SAFETY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS MAP-21 DIVISION A FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS AND HIGHWAY SAFETY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS Section Program/Topic Funding Major Changes from SAFETEA-LU Implications for Minnesota Authorizations and Programs 1101 Authorization

More information

Development and content of the transportation improvement program (TIP).

Development and content of the transportation improvement program (TIP). Code of Federal Regulations e-cfr data is current as of August 5, 2016 Title 23 Chapter I Subchapter E Part 450 Subpart C 450.326 Title 23: Highways PART 450 PLANNING ASSISTANCE AND STANDARDS Subpart C

More information

FAST Act House and Senate Freight Provisions

FAST Act House and Senate Freight Provisions Formula Funding for Freight (smaller and midsize projects) State Formula and Block Grant Funds Approved $11.650 billion apportioned * funding to establish a national freight program. States allowed to

More information

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. RTPAC #3 July 26, 2018

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. RTPAC #3 July 26, 2018 Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update RTPAC #3 July 26, 2018 1 Meeting Agenda Timeline Funding Scenarios Funding Availability Project Review Prioritization Process Ground Rules Next Steps

More information

AICP EXAM REVIEW. Transportation Planning. February 19, 2016

AICP EXAM REVIEW. Transportation Planning. February 19, 2016 AICP EXAM REVIEW Transportation Planning February 19, 2016 Agenda Defining transportation planning Transportation stakeholders Transportation plan development Transportation funding Project development

More information

2/15/2018. Metropolitan and Statewide Transportation Planning Requirements. Austin, Texas February 15, PART 1 Background

2/15/2018. Metropolitan and Statewide Transportation Planning Requirements. Austin, Texas February 15, PART 1 Background Overview of the FAST Act Metropolitan and Statewide Transportation Planning Requirements Austin, Texas February 15, 2018 1 PART 1 Background 2 1 Applicable Laws Title 23 United States Code (Highways) Section

More information

Coalition for America s Gateways and Trade Corridors

Coalition for America s Gateways and Trade Corridors Coalition for America s Gateways and Trade Corridors ACS Solutions AECOM Alameda Corridor-East Construction Authority American Standard Companies Cascadia Center CenterPoint Properties Trust Chicago Metropolitan

More information

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01

Introduction. Performance Measurement. Pg. 01 Pg. 01 Introduction The Alamo Area recognizes the importance of transportation performance tracking, goal setting and measurement to provide greater accountability and transparency and to achieve a more

More information

Transportation Improvement Program NOVEMBER, 2018

Transportation Improvement Program NOVEMBER, 2018 2019-2022 Sheboygan Metropolitan Planning Area TT Transportation Improvement Program NOVEMBER, 2018 SHEBOYGAN METROPOLITAN PLANNING AREA TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CALENDAR YEARS 2019-2022 Prepared

More information

APPENDIX A PLANNING PROCESS FOR RURAL AREAS OF THE STATE

APPENDIX A PLANNING PROCESS FOR RURAL AREAS OF THE STATE APPENDIX A PLANNING PROCESS FOR RURAL AREAS OF THE STATE Background SCDOT Statewide Transportation Planning Process Consultation Cooperation with Local Officials in Non-Metropolitan (Rural) Areas SCDOT

More information

2017 TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT

2017 TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT 0 TRANSPORTATION POLICY STATEMENT 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Critical investments are needed to maintain and improve Virginia s transportation network. The structural imbalance between critical needs and

More information

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING February 2017 performance-based planning and programming Boston Region MPO PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING WHAT IS PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING? Performance-based planning and

More information

There are two (2) amendments for which staff is requesting recommendation to the Transportation Policy Council this month:

There are two (2) amendments for which staff is requesting recommendation to the Transportation Policy Council this month: TAC Agenda Item 6A Mailout 02/08/19 RECOMMENDATION FOR TRANSPORTATION POLICY (TPC) APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE 20192022 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) AND 2040 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN

More information

Memphis and Shelby County Division of Planning & Development

Memphis and Shelby County Division of Planning & Development Memphis and Shelby County Division of Planning & Development 125 NORTH MAIN STREET, MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE 38103 Tel: (901) 576 7190 Fax: (901) 576 7272 Mark H. Luttrell, Jr. Mayor, Shelby County A C Wharton,

More information

Jay Hansen Executive Vice President National Asphalt Pavement Association

Jay Hansen Executive Vice President National Asphalt Pavement Association Jay Hansen Executive Vice President National Asphalt Pavement Association Outline of Presentation Overview Funding Program Changes Asphalt Pavement Market Outlook Resources Q & A 1991 ISTEA Intermodal

More information

Navajo Nation. Thursday September 22, :30 pm 3:15 pm. Arizona Department of Transportation Planning and Funding Processes

Navajo Nation. Thursday September 22, :30 pm 3:15 pm. Arizona Department of Transportation Planning and Funding Processes Navajo Nation 2 nd Annual Agency Roads Committee Summit Arizona Department of Transportation Planning and Funding Processes Thursday September 22, 2011 1:30 pm 3:15 pm Sky City Conference Center Acoma

More information

Joint House and Senate Transportation Committee Update to the Ten Year Plan

Joint House and Senate Transportation Committee Update to the Ten Year Plan Joint House and Senate Transportation Committee 2019 Update to the Ten Year Plan Federal and State Funding Sources 2 AFY19 Budget Revenue Estimates 3 FY19 Federal & State Funds Federal Funds 38% State

More information

Transportation Funding in the San Diego Region

Transportation Funding in the San Diego Region Role FEDERAL Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) F.1 ATCMTD - Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment FHWA Develop model deployments of large scale implementation and

More information

Creating Safe, Sustainable, Multi-Modal Urban Transportation

Creating Safe, Sustainable, Multi-Modal Urban Transportation Policy 2015 Creating Safe, Sustainable, Multi-Modal Urban Transportation The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) is a coalition of America s largest cities hubs of economic activity,

More information

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Relationship to 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) - Goals and Performance Measures Mid-Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Mid-Region Council of Governments 809 Copper Avenue NW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 (505) 247-1750-tel. (505) 247-1753-fax www.mrcog-nm.gov Transportation

More information

BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD

BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #18 15 ESTABLISHING AN AGREEMENT FOR SHARING DATA AND METHODOLOGIES TO EFFECTIVELY APPLY A PERFORMANCE BASED

More information

Technical Memorandum MULTIMODAL NEEDS. Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation. Prepared by:

Technical Memorandum MULTIMODAL NEEDS. Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation. Prepared by: Technical Memorandum MULTIMODAL NEEDS Prepared for: Oklahoma Department of Transportation Prepared by: May 2015 Technical Memorandum The Technical Memos were written to document early research for the

More information

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 ABOUT THE FREDERICKSBURG AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Established in 1992, the Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (FAMPO) is the federally designated

More information

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING February 2017 performance-based planning and programming Boston Region MPO PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING WHAT IS PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING? Performance-based planning and

More information

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft Chapter 5 Transportation Draft Discussion Similar to the other elements in the Comprehensive Plan, the transportation element impacts the quality of life, economic development and public safety of the

More information

Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is Going Forward The Plan to Maintain & Improve Mobility (Plan) and why does the region need a Long Range Transportation

More information

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018

2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan 2040 Addendum Performance-Based Planning November 2018 Adopted June 13, 2018 250 S. Orange Ave, Suite 200, Orlando, FL 32801 407-481-5672 www.metroplanorlando.org MetroPlan

More information

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING September 2018 performance-based planning and programming Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization: PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING WHAT IS PERFORMANCE-BASED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING?

More information

20-Year State Highway Investment Plan. Appendix C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY APPENDIX C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY PAGE C-1

20-Year State Highway Investment Plan. Appendix C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY APPENDIX C ACRONYMS AND GLOSSARY PAGE C-1 20-Year State Highway Investment Plan Appendix C APPENDIX C PAGE C-1 This page intentionally left blank. PAGE C-2 MINNESOTA GO 20- YEAR HIGHWAY INVESTMENT PLAN 2018-2037 Acronyms ADA APS ATM ATP BRIM CAFE

More information

MEETING SUMMARY FOR APRIL 13, 2017

MEETING SUMMARY FOR APRIL 13, 2017 SARASOTA/MANATEE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Performance Measures/Project Prioritization Process Ad Hoc Committee 7632 15 th Street East Sarasota, Florida 34243 3:00-5:00 PM MEETING SUMMARY FOR

More information

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MAY 2018 TRANSPORTATION PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published in the Federal Register (82 FR 5886)

More information

Williamsport Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization

Williamsport Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization Williamsport Area Transportation Study Metropolitan Planning Organization LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 2018-2038 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose of a Long Range Transportation Plan Transportation infrastructure

More information

Chapter 5 - Transportation

Chapter 5 - Transportation Chapter 5 - Transportation Discussion Similar to the other elements in the Comprehensive Plan, the transportation element impacts the quality of life, economic development and public safety of the residents

More information

MPO Glossary & Acronyms

MPO Glossary & Acronyms MPO Glossary & Acronyms 2016 Jonesboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Terms Continuing, Cooperative, and Comprehensive American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials American

More information

Washington State Association of Counties. County Overview: WTP Advisory Committee County Transportation Overview

Washington State Association of Counties. County Overview: WTP Advisory Committee County Transportation Overview County Overview: All citizens (6.7 million) receive county wide services (including cities) Counties are agent of State o Elections o Courts o Recording o Prosecution o Jail o Assessment/Collection of

More information

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FLORIDA INTRASTATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM Topic No.: 525-030-250-f Office: Systems Planning Effective Date: May 16, 2002 DEVELOPMENT OF THE FLORIDA

More information

AASHTO Policy Papers Topic IX: Freight

AASHTO Policy Papers Topic IX: Freight 1 AASHTO Policy Papers Topic IX: Freight Approved 4/22/02 IX-1. The U.S. DOT and AASHTO should jointly sponsor development of a freight planning capacity building process. Up to $10 million annually should

More information

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE LYNNWOOD LINK EXTENSION AUGUST 2015 Table of Contents 1 Decision... 1 1.1 Project Description... 2 1.2 Basis for the FHWA Decision... 7 1.2.1

More information

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY

Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY Appendix O Congestion Management Program REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN/SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY 2014 REGIONAL CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2014 RTP/SCS APPENDIX O SAN JOAQUIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

More information

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Public Participation Plan (PPP) is to outline methods for encouraging citizens, affected organizations and other interested parties to be involved

More information

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight

FHWA Programs Supporting Freight FHWA Programs Supporting Freight Institute for Trade and Transportation Studies Conference Office of Operations 1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight Jeff Purdy,

More information

Who Does What. Susan Handy TTP282 October 2017

Who Does What. Susan Handy TTP282 October 2017 Who Does What Susan Handy TTP282 October 2017 So who does the supplying? Who is involved in deciding what kind of transportation system we will have? Players Government Industry Citizens/ Consumers Players

More information

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. RTPAC #4 October 16, 2018

Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update. RTPAC #4 October 16, 2018 Livability 2050 Regional Transportation Plan Update RTPAC #4 October 16, 2018 1 Meeting Agenda Timeline Financial Plan Update o Adopted Funding Scenario o Revenue Projections Prioritization Process Round

More information

PURPOSE OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP)

PURPOSE OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (TIP) The Transportation Improvement program (TIP) is a staged, four-year program of projects proposed for funding by federal, State, and

More information

Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee Action Request

Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee Action Request Winston-Salem Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Advisory Committee Action Request Meeting Date: May 17, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 6 Action Requested: Consideration of an Appendix

More information

FY 2018 Unified Planning Work Program

FY 2018 Unified Planning Work Program FY 2018 Unified Planning Work Program This report was prepared by the Lawton Metropolitan Planning Organization (LMPO) and was financed in part through the United States Department of Transportation funds

More information

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet

Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Performance Measures Fact Sheet Metropolitan Planning Organization Safety Fact Sheet Safety The Safety Performance Management Measures regulation supports the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and requires State Departments of

More information

TheTransportation Planning Process Key Issues. A Briefing Book for Transportation Decisionmakers, Officials, and Staff

TheTransportation Planning Process Key Issues. A Briefing Book for Transportation Decisionmakers, Officials, and Staff TheTransportation Planning Process Key Issues A Briefing Book for Transportation Decisionmakers, Officials, and Staff A Publication of the Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program Federal Highway

More information

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 2030 MOBILITY PLAN STUDY UPDATE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES 3.20.2017 PREPARED FOR: CITY OF JACKSONVILLE 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 802.295.4999

More information

2016 Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan Development

2016 Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan Development 2016 Cape Cod Regional Transportation Plan Development APRIL 2015 PUBLIC MEETING PRESENTATION REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION P LAN ( RTP) + Long-range plan (2016-2040) + Includes all modes + Establishes the regional

More information

FY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program

FY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program FY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program This report was prepared by the Lawton Metropolitan Planning Organization (LMPO) and was financed in part through the United States Department of Transportation funds

More information

connections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan

connections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan connections 2040 the waco metropolitan transportation plan developed by the waco metropolitan planning organization in cooperation with the following agencies: adopted by the waco MPO policy board: january

More information

Rural Transportation Planning Work Program. Fiscal Years &

Rural Transportation Planning Work Program. Fiscal Years & Catawba Regional Council of Governments Rural Transportation Planning Work Program Fiscal Years 2015-16 & 2016-17 July 1, 2015 June 30, 2017 www.catawbacog.org Catawba Regional Council of Governments P.O.

More information

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT

PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION APPROVALS NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION FEBRUARY 2000 PREAMBLE This Agreement establishes the procedures of the

More information

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Regional Freight Plan

Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Regional Freight Plan Memphis Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) August 2017 Agenda Work Plan Overview Executive Summary Stakeholder Outreach and Surveys Freight Zones Regional Transportation Networks Technological

More information

Abbreviations & Definitions. Used in the. Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and the. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

Abbreviations & Definitions. Used in the. Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and the. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Abbreviations & Definitions Used in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and other planning documents ABBREVIATIONS & DEFINITIONS ADA Americans with

More information

POLICY RESOLUTIONS

POLICY RESOLUTIONS 2013-2017 POLICY RESOLUTIONS Last Updated 28 September 2017 1 P a g e TOPIC TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE MAP-21 POLICY RESOLUTIONS PR-3-13 (Support for MAP-21 Reauthorization Core Principles) 5-6 PR-4-13 (Funding

More information

Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 2018 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM

Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 2018 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM Rapid City Area Metropolitan Planning Organization 2018 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM Prepared by the City of Rapid City, City of Box Elder, City of Summerset, City of Piedmont, Pennington County, Meade

More information

PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING

PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING PERFORMANCE BASED PLANNING With the passing of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) transportation bill, and continuing in the FAST-Act, states and MPOs are required to use performance

More information

NCDOT Overview. Nick Tennyson, Chief Deputy Secretary March 4, 2015

NCDOT Overview. Nick Tennyson, Chief Deputy Secretary March 4, 2015 NCDOT Overview Nick Tennyson, Chief Deputy Secretary March 4, 2015 Overview Major Functions of DOT Board of Transportation Highway System Overview Construction- Road Building Process Operations and Maintenance

More information

FY 2019 Unified Planning Work Program FINAL. Regional Intergovernmental Council. June 14, Kanawha Putnam Metropolitan Planning Organization

FY 2019 Unified Planning Work Program FINAL. Regional Intergovernmental Council. June 14, Kanawha Putnam Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2019 Unified Planning Work Program FINAL Regional Intergovernmental Council Kanawha Putnam Metropolitan Planning Organization June 14, 2018 315 D Street. South Charleston, WV. 25303 The Unified Planning

More information

Introduction to the Proposed Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Planning and Programming

Introduction to the Proposed Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Planning and Programming Introduction to the Proposed 2015-2018 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Transportation Planning and Programming Public Hearing August 19 th, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1

More information

TCATS October 12-Michigan Works 5:30-7pm. NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm

TCATS October 12-Michigan Works 5:30-7pm. NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm Goal Development Workshop TCATS October 12- Works 5:30-7pm NATS October 19-Niles District Library 6-7:30pm SAFETEA-LU Goals 2035 TwinCATS Goals 2030 TwinCATS Goals 1. Support the economic vitality of the

More information

FISCAL YEAR UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM

FISCAL YEAR UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 20162017 UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM TITLE VI NONDISCRIMINATION STATEMENT THE BRISTOL METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ENSURES COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964;

More information

National Updates & Discussion: MAP-21

National Updates & Discussion: MAP-21 National Updates & Discussion: MAP-21 A NDY MERGENMEIER, PAVEMENT AND MATERIALS E NGINEER F EDERAL H IGHWAY A DMINISTRATION O FFICE OF T ECHNICAL SERVICES R ESOURCE C ENTER Our Visit Today History of Highway

More information

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives.

The Policies section will also provide guidance and short range policies in order to accomplish the goals and objectives. 4 Goals & Objectives INTRODUCTION The 2015-2040 MTP preserves and promotes the quality of life and economic prosperity of the MAB by providing a transportation system consistent with the regional goals.

More information

Fall 2018 Engineer Trainee Recruitment Preference Sheet

Fall 2018 Engineer Trainee Recruitment Preference Sheet Please indicate with an X your position preference. Please also indicate your preferred work location(s) for the postion(s) in which you are interested, by using 1 to indicate your first choice, 2 as your

More information

TTAC STAFF REPORT. State Targets for the MAP-21/FAST Act National Highway Performance Program. MEETING DATE: August 2, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5

TTAC STAFF REPORT. State Targets for the MAP-21/FAST Act National Highway Performance Program. MEETING DATE: August 2, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5 TTAC STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: State Targets for the MAP-21/FAST Act National Highway Performance Program MEETING DATE: August 2, 2018 AGENDA ITEM: 5 STAFF CONTACT: Andrew Orfila, Jared Carvalho RECOMMENDATION:

More information

Technical Memorandum#1A

Technical Memorandum#1A Technical Memorandum#1A Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures AMATS 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Prepared for: AMATS Prepared by: HDR Approved by AMATS PC September 28, 2017 This page intentionally

More information

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE 12 MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE The FAST Act continues the legislation authorized under MAP-21, which created a data-driven, performance-based multimodal program to address the many challenges

More information

FY Final. Transportation Improvement Program. Ames Area MPO FFY Transportation Improvement Program

FY Final. Transportation Improvement Program. Ames Area MPO FFY Transportation Improvement Program FY 2018-2021 Transportation Improvement Program The Ames Area MPO prepared this report with funding from the U.S. Department of Transportation s Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration,

More information

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017 Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017 One of the initial steps in the development of the TCRPC 2045 Metropolitan

More information

TRANSPORTATION PLAN Donald Vary

TRANSPORTATION PLAN Donald Vary LOUISIANA STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Donald Vary March 2, 2016 AGENDA Plan Development Decision-Making Process Outreach Activities Vision and Goals Transportation Needs Financial Analysis (revenue scenarios

More information

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan

WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan WTP Phase 2 Implementation & Freight System Plan Tribal Transportation Planning Organization Kathy Murray Planning Studies Group; Multimodal Planning Division Jason Beloso, Strategic Planning Manager;

More information

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies

2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies 2. Guiding Principles, Objectives, and Policies INTRODUCTION The guiding principles for the 2040 MTP Update establish the vision and key focus areas for this planning effort. They combine the guidance

More information

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans SMTC 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan Appendix A: Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans SMTC 2050 Long Range Transportation Plan Summary of transportation-related

More information

Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures. Presented by: Jason Pavluchuk Association for Commuter Transportation

Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures. Presented by: Jason Pavluchuk Association for Commuter Transportation Overview of Changes Made to CMAQ & System Performance Measures Presented by: Jason Pavluchuk Association for Commuter Transportation Agenda CMAQ Overview Changes Made by FAST ACT 2013 Guidance Performance

More information