FTP/SIS Implementation Committee Meeting May 1, 2018

Transcription

1 FTP/SIS Implementation Committee Meeting May 1, 2018 presented to presented by

2 WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS JIM WOOD, CHAIR

3 Committee Membership Changes Organization Departing Member New Member Florida Ports Council Toy Keller Casey Grigsby Florida Transportation Builder Association Bob Burleson Ananth Prasad Florida Trucking Association Tisha Keller Alix Milller Enterprise Florida Cori Henderson William Parsons Florida Department of Health Jennifer Johnson

4 Agenda Morning Implementing the FTP» SIS Policy Plan» Future Corridor Planning Process» FTP Implementation» Transportation Choices Goal Afternoon Preparing for FTP Update» Setting the Stage» 2019 TransPlex/FTP Visioning Session» Role and Activities of Champions» Partner Updates

5 PUBLIC COMMENT

6 SIS IMPLEMENTATION CHRIS EDMONSTON, FDOT

7 SIS Policy Plan Recap SIS Objectives Continuing Emphasis Areas» Reaffirm statutory intent for interregional, interstate, and international travel» Continue emphasis on largest and most strategic facilities 7

8 8 SIS Implementation Steps

9 Redefine SIS Designation Criteria and Policies to: 9 Address potential large scale economic development opportunities» Create Strategic Growth component to improve flexibility to support economic development opportunities Maintain a high priority on facilities that play a critical role in supporting global and domestic trade flows» Differentiate between SIS and Strategic Growth and strengthen the de-designation process Consider new types of facilities that may be developed over time» Add Freight Access Facilities to support Freight Activity Areas Increase emphasis on multimodal terminals and corridors» Revise Interregional Passenger Terminal criteria to encourage co-located facilities Better reflect context of the human and natural environment» Refresh the community and environment screening criteria

10 How SIS Designation Has Changed Facility Type Commercial Service Airports General Aviation Airports N/A 2 Spaceports 1 2 Seaports Interregional Passenger Terminals Freight Rail Terminals 7 8 Urban Fixed Guideway Terminals N/A 36 Intermodal Logistics Centers N/A 1 Highway Corridors 4,200 miles 4,396 miles Intermodal Connectors ~245 miles 257 miles Military Access Facility N/A 48 miles Rail Corridor 1,940 miles 2,090 miles Intermodal Connectors ~136 miles 235 miles Waterway Corridor 1,210 miles 1,930 miles Intermodal Connectors ~160 miles 183 miles 10

11 Changes to SIS Structure Former Revised SIS Planned Add SIS SIS Emerging SIS Strategic Growth 11 Under revised framework, Planned Add/Drop would be an internal FDOT processing term.

12 Proposed Strategic Growth Criteria All Modes Facility must meet AT LEAST ONE of the following: OR Is the facility projected to meet SIS minimum activity levels within three years of being designated? Is the facility determined by FDOT to be of compelling state interest, such as creating a significant economic development opportunity or potentially becoming the most strategic facility in a region that has no designated SIS facility? AND 12

13 Potential Strategic Growth Criteria All Modes (cont.) In addition to meeting at least one of the criteria on the previous slide, a facility must also meet ALL of the following: Does the facility have a current master plan as well as a prioritized list of production ready projects? Is the facility identified in a local government comprehensive plan, long range transportation plan, Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS), Transit Development Plan (TDP), or equivalent? Does the facility have partner and public consensus on viability of a new or significantly expanded facility? Does the facility meet community and environment screening criteria? 13

14 Proposed Designation Criteria - Hubs Commercial Service Airports» 2.5% of Florida Total Enplanements or Cargo Activity General Aviation Reliever Airports» Criteria Defined in s F.S. The airport it relieves must be designated as SIS Handles at least 75,000 itinerant (nonlocal) operations per year Has a runway length of at least 5,500 linear feet Capable of handling aircraft weighing at least 60,000 pounds with a dual wheel configuration which is served by at least on precision instrument approach Serves a cluster of aviation-dependent industries 14 Spaceports» Regularly scheduled civil, commercial, or military launches resulting in suborbital or orbital flights.

15 Proposed Designation Criteria - Hubs Public Seaports» 1% of Florida Total Annual Freight Volume Measured in Tonnage or TEUs; OR» 250,000 Home Port Cruise Passengers Interregional Passenger Terminals» 100,000 annual interregional rail or bus passengers; OR» Co-located with another transit mode and 50,000 annual interregional rail and/or bus passengers Freight Rail Terminals» 5% Florida Total Annual Freight Volume measured in Intermodal Freight Units 15

16 Proposed Designation Criteria - Hubs Intermodal Logistics Center» Meets the definition of an ILC; AND» Provides ability to accommodate and support, within a logistics chain that may span multiple modes and handling steps, domestic or international trade moving to or from a SIS seaport or airport; AND» Is identified in a local comprehensive plan or local government development order as an intermodal logistics center or equivalent planning term; AND» Meets minimum size thresholds for cargo throughput, consistent with existing SIS hub criteria for the type of intermodal movement primarily handled by the ILC (e.g., air cargoto-truck tonnage 2.5% of Florida total; waterborne container-to-truck or rail TEUs - 1% of Florida total; intermodal rail terminal units - 5% of Florida total) 16

17 Proposed Designation Criteria Hubs and Corridors Urban Fixed Guideway Transit Corridors» Urban fixed guideway transit corridors connecting multiple urbanized area counties and serving as a regionally significant facility within a single economic region. Urban Fixed Guideway Terminals» All qualifying urban fixed guideway system terminals will be included as part of the corridor designation. Terminals will be treated as SIS hubs and associated with an intermodal connector if they meet one or more of the following criteria: Are located at or near the termini of the urban fixed guideway corridor Serve a SIS airport, seaport, or spaceport Are integrated with other SIS passenger rail or bus systems providing connections to other regions or states Are co-located with a major park-and-ride facility 17

18 Proposed Designation Criteria - Corridors Highway Corridors» An interstate or high capacity tolled facility; OR» A limited access facility (access level 1) with a SIS facility or limited access facility (access level 1) at each end; OR» An NHS facility that connects to an urbanized area outside of Florida that is not already served by a SIS facility; OR» A controlled access facility (access level 2 or 3) connecting two or more urbanized areas with a SIS facility at each end; OR» A corridor connecting one or more urbanized areas with or through a Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO) and having an AADT of at least 6,000 or an AADTT of at least 1,000 with a SIS facility at each end 18

19 Proposed Designation Criteria - Corridors Rail Corridors» SIS Track Class I or Track Class II Mainline with 2 or more trains per day» Strategic Growth Track Class III Shortline with 2 or more trains per day 19

20 Proposed Designation Criteria - Corridors Waterway Corridors» Coastal Shipping Lanes and Intracoastal Waterway Designated intracoastal waterway or coastal shipping lane handling international waterborne trade.» Inland Deep Draft Waterway authorized depth greater than or equal to 12 feet 5% of Florida Total annual total waterway freight tonnage» Inland Shallow Draft Waterway authorized depth less than 12 feet 5% of Florida Total annual domestic waterway freight tonnage 20

21 New Facility Type: Freight Activity Areas and Freight Access Facilities Freight Access Facility» Provides access to clusters of freight activity called Freight Activity Areas» Connector that functions similar to Military Access Facility Polk County Pilot Study» Developing potential criteria to identify Freight Access Areas in Polk County that can be applied statewide Considering employment data, square footage, and freight traffic to define Freight Activity Areas 21

22 SIS Implementation Timeline SIS Structure Summary» August 2017 Presented proposed structure to FDOT management - Completed SIS Designation Criteria Summary and Designation Review» October 2017 Presented proposed designation criteria to FDOT management - Completed» May 2018 Present proposed structure and designation criteria for FDOT management review» May/June 2018 Public and Partner Comment Period» June 2018 Final adoption of criteria and designation changes Coming Next» SIS Funding Eligibility Guidance Complete December 2018» SIS Prioritization Process Complete December

23 FUTURE CORRIDOR IMPLEMENTATION JIM WOOD, FDOT

24 The Future of Our Transportation Corridors Tampa Bay to Central Florida» East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Guiding Principles and Study Areas Existing Corridors New Corridors Regional Transit Vision

25 The Future of Our Transportation Corridors Tampa Bay to Northeast Florida» I-75 Relief Task Force Passenger Rail Study North I-75 Master Plan I-75 Feasibility Study US 301 Corridor Study Coastal Connector Alternative Corridor Evaluation

26 The Future of Our Transportation Corridors US 27 Multimodal Corridor Study» Interregional connectivity» Freight mobility» Economic development» Emergency evacuation and response» Safety

27 The Future of Our Transportation Planning Refining and Improving» Integrated and Consistent Approaches» Statewide Corridor Planning Process» Existing and Future Conditions» Planning and Environmental Linkages

28 FTP IMPLEMENTATION DANA REIDING, FDOT

29 How Are We Implementing the FTP? Supporting FTP champions Aligning with other FDOT and partner plans Advancing high priority actions Strengthening planning processes at all levels Tracking performance and progress

30 FTP Champions Goals Committee Champion Internal Champion Safety & Security Infrastructure Mobility Choices Economic Competitiveness Quality of Life & Quality Places Environment & Energy Jennifer Johnson Department of Health Jim Ely TEAM Florida Hon. Susan Haynie MPO Advisory Council Laura Cantwell AARP Florida Sally Patrenos Floridians for Better Transportation Pat Steed Florida Regional Councils Association Janet Bowman The Nature Conservancy Lora Hollingsworth Safety Office Courtney Drummond Chief Engineer Huiwei Shen Systems Implementation Office Brenda Young District 5 Amie Goddeau District 4 Gail Holley State Engineering & Operations Office Jim Wood Chief Planner

31 Florida s Modal and System Plans Florida Transportation Plan (Updated December 2015) SIS Policy Plan (Updated March 2016) Freight Mobility and Trade Plan (Addendum January 2018) Strategic Highway Safety Plan (Updated October 2016) Seaport and Waterways Plans (Updated August 2016) Motor Carrier System Plan (Updated June 2017) TSM&O Strategic Plan(Updated August 2017) Aviation System Plan (Updated November 2017) Spaceport System Plan (Updated March 2018) Transportation Asset Management Plan (April 2018) Rail System Plan (Update in Progress)

32 Coordinating with Partner Plans

33 Advancing High Priority Actions: Implementing the Strategic Highway Safety Plan

34 Advancing High Priority Actions: SIS Resiliency Analysis Set Mission Goals and Objectives Integrate Assessment Outcomes into FDOT's Decision Support Systems a. Asset Data Collection (Asset Inventory) b. Collect Climate Data Potential Logical Conclusion from Assessment Results (Not Scoped Currently) Develop Adaptation Strategies Conduct Vulnerability and Risk Assessment (Screening & Impacts Assessment) SIS Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Scope

35 Advancing High Priority Actions: Automated, Connected, Electric, and Shared Vehicles Sun Trax Automated/Connected Vehicle Testing Site

36 Advancing High Priority Actions: Rural Transportation Planning Process

37 Advancing High Priority Actions: Partner Activities

38 Strengthening Planning Processes Pre-Study Scoping Establish Consistency with Existing Plans and Visions Document Existing Conditions Project Future Conditions Identify Issues and Opportunities Formulate Potential Solutions Evaluate and Compare Potential Solutions Define, Package and Prioritize Alternatives for Advancement Document Decisions and Prepare Action Plan

39 FTP Implementation Element

40 BREAK

41 TRANSPORTATION CHOICES DISCUSSION KAREN KISELEWSKI, CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS

42

43 Transportation Choices People Focused Accessibility Connectivity Equity Choices Accessibility Ability to reach desired destinations, activities, goods, and services Connectivity - State or extent of being connected or interconnected; capacity for the interconnection of systems and applications Equity Quality of being fair and impartial; dealing fairly and equally with all concerned

44 Transportation Choices Accessibility - Access to jobs, education, food, recreation, health and community services» First- and last-mile, such as ride sharing and E-bikes» Enhanced infrastructure, such as sidewalks, protected bike lanes» Transit to destinations» Emerging opportunities, such as automated/connected vehicles» Programs, such as Safe Routes to Schools, Commuter Assistance Photo: Jim Curtain, Seattle DOT 2018 Safe Street Summit

45 Transportation Choices Connectivity» Interregional» Intra regional urban to non-urban» Cross-jurisdictional» Interconnected systems Mixed modes Pay/fare systems Traveler services (planning & information)» Private sector (apps, sharing services)» End-to-end

46 Transportation Choices Equity» Personal decisions Costs Convenience Trip length or purpose Safety» Planning decisions Project locations Funding Transportation disadvantaged Data and performance measurement Pros Cons

47 Transportation Choices Discussion What does having Transportation Choices mean to you? What implementation guidance would be beneficial? What aspect of Transportation Choices do you think needs more attention for the FTP update?

48 DISCUSSION

49 LUNCH

50 SETTING THE STAGE CARMEN MONROY, FDOT

51 is the careful use of limited resources begins prior to inception and extends through the entire lifecycle of a project is directly tied to and influenced by public input

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59 Public and Partner Involvement Refined and New Strategies or Policy Implementation Activities Trends and Performance

60 2019 TRANSPLEX AND FTP VISIONING SESSION DANA REIDING, FDOT

61 Looking Ahead: The Next FTP and SIS Policy Plan Key dates» FTP update by 2020» SIS Policy Plan update by 2021 Anticipated approach» Transition back to an FTP/SIS Steering Committee in May 2019» FTP Vision Element: refresh based on May 2019 summit and partner/public input Policy Element: update through work of Committee/champions and partner/public input Implementation Element: maintain as living document» SIS Policy Plan Refresh for consistency with FTP and to consider emerging trends

62 FTP/SIS Timeline 2018 FTP Champions Continue to Support FTP/SIS Implementation Coordinate with FTP Champions to Support TransPlex 2019 FTP Implementation Committee Meeting Begin Update of SIS Funding Eligibility Guidance FTP Implementation Committee Meeting Begin Partner Interviews and Briefings to Prepare for FTP/SIS Plan Updates Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Adopt SIS Designation Criteria Changes Present Final SIS Funding Eligibility Guidance and Final SIS Project Prioritization Process to FDOT Management Begin Update of SIS Project Prioritization Process

63 FTP/SIS Timeline 2019 FTP Champions Provide input related to FTP Vision Element Update Continue to coordinate with FTP Champions to Support TransPlex 2019 FTP Champions Provide input related to minor updates to FTP Goals and Objectives Update All Existing SIS Documents to Reflect SIS Changes Update FTP Vision Element Alternative Futures TransPlex 2019 & FTP Visioning Session Begin FTP/SIS Update Partner Outreach Presentations/Meetings Draft update of FTP Vision Element Finalize Update of FTP Vision Element Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Revise FTP Implementation Element and Performance Snapshot FTP/SIS Steering Committee Meeting FTP/SIS Steering Committee Meeting FTP/SIS Steering Committee Meeting

64 FTP/SIS Timeline 2020 FTP Champions Continue to Provide input related to minor updates to FTP Goals and Objectives FTP/SIS Steering Committee Meeting Host FTP/SIS Regional Workshops Finalize Updates to FTP Goals and Objectives FTP/SIS Steering Committee Meeting Present FTP Policy Element for 30 Day Public Comment Period Finalize and Print FTP Policy Element Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Draft FTP Goals and Objectives FTP/SIS Steering Committee Meeting Review SIS Policy Plan Objectives and Align with Updates to FTP Goals and Objectives Present FTP Policy Element to FDOT Executive Committee and Florida Transportation Commission

65 Partners: Who Else Needs to Be Part of this Conversation? Emergency management agencies Health agencies/stakeholders Department of Elders Affairs/age-friendly communities Community developers Community action agencies/housing and homelessness agencies Technology providers

66 TransPlex 2019 May 7-9, 2019 The Omni Jacksonville, Florida

67 TransPlex 2019: Overview Day 1» High school debate on future of transportation» Panel discussion reflecting on 2020 FTP Day 2» Technical sessions focused on six topics Innovation Collaboration Uncertainty Economy Community Applications Day 3» FTP Visioning Session» FTP Steering Committee meeting

68 TransPlex 2019: Opportunities to Be Involved Suggest session topics, speakers Showcase your research, data, applications in exhibit hall Host a networking event Encourage your members/partners to participate

69 BREAK

70 ROLE AND ACTIVITIES OF CHAMPIONS BRIAN WATTS, FDOT

71 Champion Roles Continue to support FTP implementation by» Supporting implementation of goal through ongoing activities of key partners.» Helping identify and assess actions, policies, strategies, or plans of partners and stakeholders that support goal Prepare for FTP update» Helping identify issues and opportunities related to goal that should be considered in FTP update, such as trends, innovations, research needs or results, new or updated partner policies and plans» Assisting with outreach to partner and constituents to gather early input on FTP update Provide update on FTP implementation and partner input at FTP Implementation Committee meetings

72 Emerging Trends Examples Demographics» Travel needs and preferences of millennial and GenZ residents» Mobility needs of growing elderly and disabled populations Economy» Impact of changing global trade flows and supply chains» Growth in gig workers, telework, flexible hours Development patterns» Location and intensity of future population and economic growth Access to opportunity» Relationship between transportation, housing, and other living costs» Equity impacts of transportation choices

73 Emerging Trends Examples Risk and resilience» Vulnerability to sea level change and extreme weather events» Emerging risks related to cybersecurity and an integrated global economy Technology» Safety and mobility impacts of connected and automated vehicles» What s next: mobility impacts of artificial intelligence, Internet of Things, and 5G Investment» Revenue implications of emerging technologies and energy sources» Incentivizing private investment

74 PARTNER UPDATES

75 PUBLIC COMMENT

76 NEXT STEPS JIM WOOD, CHAIR

77 Upcoming Dates FTP SIS Implementation Committee: October 16, 2018, Daytona Beach» In conjunction with FPTA Annual Conference» Details including room block coming soon TransPlex May 7-9, 2019, Jacksonville» Includes FTP Visioning Session» Includes FTP SIS Implementation Committee meeting» Save the date, registration, room block coming soon!

78 ADJOURN