METRO BOARD OF DIRECTORS CAPITAL PROGRAMS WORKING COMMITTEE MEETING DECEMBER 9, :30 AM

Transcription

1 METRO BOARD OF DIRECTORS CAPITAL PROGRAMS WORKING COMMITTEE MEETING DECEMBER 9, :30 AM ACTION ITEMS 1. Authorization for the President & CEO to execute and deliver a contract modification to LTK Engineering Services for an extension to complete the safety certification of METRO s H3 Light Rail Vehicles. T. Kelly 2. Authorization for the President & CEO to submit the Cypress L-Ramp project to the Houston- Galveston Area Council for consideration for funding in the Transportation Improvement Program. C. Harbert 3. Authorization for the President & CEO to approve a budget transfer from capital contingency to active for sufficient design to maintain construction feasibility for a future Cypress L-Ramp between the US 290 HOV lane and the Cypress Park & Ride. C. Harbert 4. Authorization for the President & CEO to submit the Magnolia Transit Center project to the Houston-Galveston Area Council for consideration for funding in the Transportation Improvement Program. C. Harbert BRIEFING ITEMS 5. Procurement Solicitation Report M. Kyme 6. RFQ Central Stores Fire Suppression R. Treviño 7. Hardy Yards/Burnett Transit Center Cypress Developer/ R. Treviño 8. Fare Collection System C. Harbert

2

3

4

5

6

7 December 2014 Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

8 Safety Certification is required for all Rail Transit Capital Projects, including rehabilitation work, under 49 CFR Part (h). Safety Certification is the series of processes that collectively verify the safety and security readiness of a project for public use. Checklists are created using various design criteria and documents to make sure all items are completed before opening, or use of an alignment, facility or vehicle. The METRO Safety and Security Certification Review Committee meets monthly to review and approve all Safety Certifications. LTK was hired to do the Safety Certification for METRO s new light rail vehicles for the rail extensions. Due to delays with the H3 (CAF) cars, the fleet Safety Certification has not yet been completed, though LTK s contract will expire December

9 Safety Certification to be Completed PARSONS METRO LTK Design/Build Safety Certification for: North Corridor East Corridor Southeast Corridor Downtown Corridor ROC Modifications S & I Storage Facility Operational Safety Certification for: North Corridor East Corridor Southeast Corridor Downtown Corridor ROC Modifications S & I Storage Facility Vehicle Safety Certification for: H1 Upgrades (assisted by LTK) - Fleet Upgrade - Individual vehicle upgrades Vehicle Safety Certification for: H2 -Vehicle Design -Individual vehicles H3 -Vehicles Design -Individual vehicles 3

10 Extend the LTK Engineering Services contract for six (6) months Maintain continuity through completion of Safety Certification for H3 CAF Vehicles Extension request works within the current contract amount Minimizes potential delays in H3 CAF Vehicles being released for revenue service if LTK s projects fall on METRO Staff 4

11 Increase the LTK Engineering Services contract by $20,000 To complete the Post-Delivery Buy America Audit needed to comply with 49 CFR part 663 regarding the H3 (CAF) vehicles 5

12

13 December 2014 Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

14 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) is first 4 years of the region s long range plan Funding specified and allocated to projects Projects compete for federal and state dollars H-GAC selects projects of regional significance Fiscal years Projects must meet regional goals Projects approved by Transportation Policy Council 2

15 Competitive process Projects screened by: Readiness criteria & conformity impact Benefit/Cost analysis (safety, congestion, asset management/operations, economic competitiveness & environment) Planning factors (quantitative and qualitative) Applications due January 12,

16 Significant operational savings: Initial savings estimate: $400K - 600K/yr. Potential future demand savings increase to approximately $800K/yr. Timing with US 290 construction is optimal Approximate Cost Estimate: $30 - $35M $24 - $28M federal request (80%) $6 $7M METRO share (20%) 4

17 Requires upfront commitment by METRO to coordinate design activities with TxDOT Maintains construction feasibility for when METRO chooses to advance project either through this grant or later Commitment would require METRO pay TxDOT for design accommodation and purchase additional ROW 5

18 Approve staff to submit the Cypress L-Ramp project application for the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Call for Projects Authorize a budget transfer of $2 million from capital contingency to active for sufficient design to maintain construction feasibility for a future Cypress L-Ramp between the US 290 HOV lane and the Cypress Park & Ride. 6

19 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM METRO FY FY2019 CASH FLOW WITH HISTORY PROJECT TITLE & DESCRIPTION: US-290/Cypress Park & Ride L-Ramp ROW Purchase: A TxDOT project will extend Project: NEW the single lane barrier separated HOV/HOT lane beyond the location of the existing Cypress Park & Ride facility. As part of the SCHEDULE DATA: project a new T-Ramp is proposed from the Cypress Park & Ride lot to the Managed lanes. The layout of the proposed L- Ramp and associated travel lanes is outside of METRO's current right-of-way for the facility. METRO bus operations will be START COMPL able to directly access the HOV/HOT lanes rather than exit the facility into mixed traffic to access the freeway. Buses would Land then need to merge across 4 lanes of traffic and enter the managed lanes at the next slip ramp entrance ramp. Design Constr. Operational JUSTIFICATION: The first year initiative will purchase the right-of-way and obtain environmental clearance necessary for METRO to construct the facility. OPERATING IMPACT: This project will provide a direct access from the existing Cypress Park & Ride lot to the US-290 Managed Lanes, and will improve bus and HOV operations from this facility. EXPENDED PLANNED EXPENDITURES ($ X 1,000) THRU REVISED UNDER CONTRACT CATEGORY / RANK (SGR/EN/SE) PROJECT CATEGORIES FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 TOTAL Environmental Land/ROW ,200 Design 120 1, ,034 Construction 420 8,580 7,946 16,946 Construction Management ,695 Project Management - METRO Labor ,188 Project Management - Expenses 0 Project Management - Outside A/E ,188 Procurement 0 Allocated Overhead ,389 Contingency ,513 2,209 5,630 TOTAL PROJECT COST 0 0 1,909 3,532 15,076 13, ,770 Y EN 0 0 FUNDING SOURCE FEDERAL 934 2,826 12,061 10,602 26,423 DEBT 0 METRO ,015 2, ,347 FUNDING TOTAL 0 0 1,909 3,532 15,076 13, ,770 OPERATING COST H:\Executive\Board File\Board Meeting Folders\2014 BOARD MEETINGS\12-DECEMBER 2014\13.3-ATTACHMENT-Cypress L-Ramp HGAC TIP CAPITAL [FY2015 CIP] 11/19/2014 8:13 AM

20

21 December 2014 Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

22 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) is first 4 years of the region s long range plan Funding specified and allocated to projects Projects compete for federal and state dollars H-GAC selects projects of regional significance Fiscal years Projects must meet regional goals Projects approved by Transportation Policy Council 2

23 Competitive process Projects screened by: Readiness criteria & conformity impact Benefit/Cost analysis (safety, congestion, asset management/operations, economic competitiveness & environment) Planning factors (quantitative and qualitative) Applications due January 12,

24 Significant operational savings: Initial savings estimate: $400K - 600K/yr. Potential future demand savings increase to approximately $800K/yr. Timing with US 290 construction is optimal Approximate Cost Estimate: $30 - $35M $24 - $28M federal request (80%) $6 $7M METRO share (20%) 4

25 Requires upfront commitment by METRO to coordinate design activities with TxDOT Maintains construction feasibility for when METRO chooses to advance project either through this grant or later Commitment would require METRO pay TxDOT for design accommodation and purchase additional ROW 5

26 Approve staff to submit the Cypress L-Ramp project application for the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Call for Projects Authorize a budget transfer of $1.9 million from unallocated capital project funding for sufficient design to maintain construction feasibility for a future Cypress L-Ramp between the US 290 HOV lane and the Cypress Park & Ride. 6

27

28 December 2014 Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

29 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) is first 4 years of the region s long range plan Funding specified and allocated to projects Projects compete for federal and state dollars H-GAC selects projects of regional significance Fiscal years Projects must meet regional goals Projects approved by Transportation Policy Council 2

30 Competitive process Projects screened by: Readiness criteria & conformity impact Benefit/Cost analysis (safety, congestion, asset management/operations, economic competitiveness & environment) Planning factors (quantitative and qualitative) Applications due January 12,

31 Current 4 bay facility, operating as a 6 bay Canopy structure needs updating Modifications needed to interface with East End Light Rail Transit Cost: $3,869,000 $3,095,200 federal request (80%) $773,800 METRO share (20%) 4

32 5

33 Approve staff to submit Magnolia Transit Center Expansion project application for the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Call for Projects 6

34 Magnolia Transit Center Magnolia Transit Center 04-Dec-14 08:14 Activity ID Activity Name Planned Duration Magnolia Transit Center Activity % Complete Start Finish Total Float Planned Total Cost Dec Dec-16 0 $3,900, Dec Dec-16 0 $362,000 Project Management PM1000 Project Start 0 0% 01-Dec-14* 9 $0 PM5020 PM cost 464 0% 01-Dec Dec-16 0 $215,000 PM5040 PM Expense 464 0% 01-Dec Dec-16 0 $10,000 PM5060 Allocated OH 464 0% 01-Dec Dec-16 0 $137,000 PM2000 Issue NTP for Construction 0 0% 07-Jun-16 0 $0 PM8000 Project Completion 0 0% 16-Dec-16 0 $ Dec Jan-16 9 $0 Capital Planning CP1000 Notification of Candidate Project 47 0% 01-Dec Feb-15 9 $0 CP120 Environmental Clearance 85 0% 16-Feb Jun-15 9 $0 CP1040 FTA Coordination 120 0% 01-Jul Jan-16 9 $ Jul Jan $405,000 Civil Design CD1000 APP and Requistion 10 0% 01-Jul Jul $0 CD1020 Issue WA to Designer 30 0% 17-Jul Sep $0 CD2000 Civil Design 60 0% 03-Sep Dec $335,000 CD5020 Design Contingency 81 0% 03-Sep Jan $70,000 CD3000 Submit for COH Review 0 0% 10-Dec $0 CD3020 COH Review Design / Revision / Approval 20 0% 10-Dec Jan $0 CD3080 City Of Houston Approves 0 0% 13-Jan $ Jan Jun-16 0 $0 Bid and Award - Construction Contractor BA1100 Prepare APP & Requisition 5 0% 13-Jan Jan-16 9 $0 BA1120 Prepare IFB 20 0% 13-Jan Feb-16 9 $0 BA1220 Chairman approves advertisement 5 0% 21-Jan Jan $0 BA1140 Issue IFB to Procurement 0 0% 12-Feb-16 9 $0 BA1230 METRO Internal Signatures prior to advertisement 4 0% 12-Feb Feb-16 9 $0 BA1240 Advertisement On Sunday (start) 0 0% 21-Feb-16 3 $0 BA1290 Advertisement for Bid 28 0% 21-Feb Mar $0 BA1300 Contractors Prepare and Submit Bid 20 0% 22-Feb Mar $ O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Remaining Level of Effort Actual Work Remaining Work Critical Remaining Work Milestone Summary Page 1 of 2 Magnolia Transit Center TASK filter: All Activities Project ID: MagnoliaTC Data Date: 01-Dec-14

35 Magnolia Transit Center Magnolia Transit Center 04-Dec-14 08:14 Activity ID Activity Name Planned Duration Activity % Complete Start Finish Total Float Planned Total Cost BA1280 Pre-Bid Meeting 0 0% 01-Mar $0 BA1320 Contractors Submit Bids 0 0% 23-Mar $0 BA1380 Procurement verifies all necessary paper work for Responsivene 5 0% 23-Mar Mar $0 BA1400 Captial Programs Reviews and Recommends Board approval of 5 0% 23-Mar Mar $0 BA1410 Capital Programs Committee 0 0% 11-Apr $0 BA1420 BOARD Approves low bidder 0 0% 28-Apr-16 0 $0 BA1440 Procurement routes contract for signature 15 0% 28-Apr May-16 0 $0 BA1460 Contractor issues insurance and bonds and required contractually 24 0% 28-Apr Jun-16 0 $0 BA1145 Contract Award 0 0% 23-May-16 9 $0 BA1480 Pre-Construction Meeting 0 0% 23-May-16 9 $ Jun Dec-16 0 $3,133,000 Construction CO1000 NTP - Construction 0 0% 07-Jun-16 0 $0 CO1200 Canopy Fabrication - Magnolia Transit Center 80 0% 07-Jun Oct-16 0 $0 CO5020 Construction cost 120 0% 07-Jun Dec-16 0 $2,200,000 CO5040 Design Services for Designer 120 0% 07-Jun Dec-16 0 $50,000 CO5060 Construction Management 120 0% 07-Jun Dec-16 0 $150,000 CO5080 Construction Contingency 120 0% 07-Jun Dec-16 0 $733,000 CO2000 Construction - Magnolia Transit Center 50 0% 08-Jul Sep $0 CO1220 Canopy Installation - Magnolia Transit Center 20 0% 13-Oct Nov-16 0 $0 CO4020 Punch List / Close out 20 0% 15-Nov Dec-16 0 $0 CO4040 Project Completion 0 0% 16-Dec-16 0 $ O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Remaining Total Cost $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $3,200,000 $600,000 $2,400,000 $400,000 $1,600,000 $200,000 $800,000 Remaining Level of Effort Critical Remaining Work Page 2 of 2 TASK filter: All Activities $0 O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Actual Work Remaining Work Milestone Summary Magnolia Transit Center Project ID: MagnoliaTC Data Date: 01-Dec-14

36

37 BOARD BRIEFING SUMMARY SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #: PROCUREMENT SOLICITATION REPORT AGENDA DATE: DEPARTMENT: CAPITAL PROGRAMS PRESENTER: MIKE KYME SUMMARY:

38 ANTICIPATED PROCUREMENT PROJECTS Solicitations over $50K December Consent List FY2015 Q1 - Q2 NO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROCUREMENT METHOD (RFP, RFQ, IFB) ANTICIPATED SMALL BUSINESS GOAL ANTICIPATED ADVERTISEMENT MONTH ANTICIPATED AMOUNT COMMENTS BOARD COMMITTEE PREVIOUS BOARD COMMITTEE CONCUR Y 1 Burnett Plaza Escalator IFB TBD January TBD Capital Programs June November El Dorado Plaza Park & Ride Construction IFB TBD TBD $10M Capital Programs July November Central Stores Fire Alarm and Fire Suppression System Re-design RFQ 35% January $200,000 Capital Programs 4 Electricity RFP N/A January TBD Three (3) year contract Capital Programs 5 METROLift RFP TBD January TBD Customer Service April September /21/14

39 ANTICIPATED PROCUREMENT PROJECTS Solicitations over $50K December Consent List FY2015 Q1 - Q2 NO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROCUREMENT METHOD (RFP, RFQ, IFB) ANTICIPATED SMALL BUSINESS GOAL ANTICIPATED ADVERTISEMENT MONTH ANTICIPATED AMOUNT COMMENTS BOARD COMMITTEE 6 Nitrile Gloves IFB N/A January $204, Customer Service PREVIOUS BOARD COMMITTEE CONCUR Y 7 Budget System Migration DIR/RFP N/A TBD $305, Customer Service 8 Liability (Auto & GL) and Workers Compensation Claims Investigative Services RFP N/A January $250, Two (2) -year contract with three (3) one-year options Customer Service 9 Auto, Truck & Property Appraisal Services 10 On-Site Drug & Alcohol Collection Services RFP N/A January $250, Two (2) year contract with three (3) one-year options RFQ N/A January $480, Three (3) year contract Customer Service Customer Service 11/21/14

40 ANTICIPATED PROCUREMENT PROJECTS Solicitations over $50K December Consent List FY2015 Q1 - Q2 NO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROCUREMENT METHOD (RFP, RFQ, IFB) ANTICIPATED SMALL BUSINESS GOAL ANTICIPATED ADVERTISEMENT MONTH ANTICIPATED AMOUNT COMMENTS BOARD COMMITTEE PREVIOUS BOARD COMMITTEE CONCUR Y 11 Toll Collection Services RFP N/A January TBD Customer Service October 12 Installation Integration and Configuration of SAP Business Objects DIR/RFP TBD January 99,000 Customer Service 13 METRO Salaried Employee / Retiree Medical and Life Insurance Benefits RFP TBD January TBD People 11/21/14

41 BOARD BRIEFING SUMMARY SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #: Central Stores Fire Alarm System AGENDA DATE: 12/18/14 DEPARTMENT: Planning Engineering & Construction PRESENTER: Rocky Marrero SUMMARY: The goal of this briefing is to provide some background on the current situation with the fire alarm system at the Central Stores Warehouse and the need to design a new system that is compliant with all current life safety codes. We will be seeking Board Concurrence to do a Request for Qualifications for Engineering Design of a new fire life safety system at the Central Stores Warehouse.

42 Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

43 We have two issues at Central Stores Warehouse: Storage Rack High Piled Storage: The original fire sprinkler design is not adequate to protect high piled storage City of Houston Water Supply: The water supply pressure coming into the building is not sufficient enough to provide water to the existing fire suppression system This project will design a new fire alarm and fire suppression system that provides the appropriate levels of coverage for High Piled storage New system will include a new water storage tank and a booster pump to ensure the proper amount of water pressure can be delivered to the sprinkler system if needed System will also include new sprinkler heads and head placement to allow METRO to pursue a high pile storage permit. Project is safety sensitive and needs to be expedited 2

44 Existing Dry Pipe Sprinkler System 3

45 We seek Board Concurrence to do a Request for Qualifications for Engineering Design of a new fire life safety system at the Central Stores Warehouse. 4

46 Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Facility Maintenance SCOPE OF CONSULTING SERVICE FOR CS Fire Suppression Design PR# 14- General Description: This work consists of performing engineering design to maximize the storage capacity at the Central Stores Facility at 1220 McCarty Road, Houston, Texas (Key Map 495J). Project Location The following METRO personnel will be the primary contacts for the consultant: Personnel contact METRO Project Manager: Kalvin Williams Page 1 of 5 CS Fire Suppression Design Scope (04/11/2014)

47 (713) office, (713) cell. METRO Facility Supervisor: Larry Zientek (713) office, (713) cell. Scope of Work: 1. Existing Condition 1.1. Central Stores Facility is a warehouse/office facility that acts as METRO s central supply warehouse (See photos #1 & 2). The Central Stores Building was erected in 1985 and fully occupied by January The building was built to the Southern Building Code with Houston amendments which were in effect at the time of building construction The existing warehouse was in violation of the City of Houston Fire Code on the premises located at 1220 McCarty Street. METRO Transit Authority hired a consultant, evaluated and corrected the issued code violations. The warehouse is now in compliance with current City of Houston Fire Codes. Existing Rack Storage Photo #1 Inside Central Stores Warehouse. Page 2 of 5 CS Fire Suppression Design Scope (04/11/2014)

48 Existing Sprinkler System Photo #2 Inside Central Stores Warehouse. Drawing #1 is a plan view of the Central Stores Warehouse/Office Layout: 2. Consultant Services Page 3 of 5 CS Fire Suppression Design Scope (04/11/2014)

49 2.1. The sprinkler system evaluation shall be reviewed by a qualified fire protection engineer to gain an understanding of the existing conditions. (Refer to the RJA Sprinkler System Evaluation dated ) 2.2. The engineer shall analyze the Central Stores Facility and identify where alternate approaches may be used to meet the intent of the code and satisfy the facility function. The engineer shall provide a building analysis so that METRO can make decisions regarding retrofit and replacement of fire protection systems The engineer will advise METRO on all options available that will maximize storage capacity in the Central Stores Facility. All options shall include an estimated construction cost and time duration The engineer will determine whether the original sprinkler system design is adequate for the protection of the commodities and storage arrangements found at the facility given the City of Houston water supply in that area The engineer shall prepare and submit plans for High-Piled Combustible Storage to the City of Houston Building Department and Hazmat/High Piled Storage Team for review and approval. (Refer to the attached City of Houston Inspection Report section 2 HFC ) 2.6. The engineer shall prepare and submit plans for H-Occupancy Storage to the City of Houston Building Department and Hazmat/High-Piled 180 Team for review and approval. (Refer to the attached City of Houston Inspection Report section 2 HFC ) 3. METRO Requirements 3.1. The Consultant may choose to team with a fire protection sub-consultant to produce the plans and statements listed above The METRO small business goal as determined by the METRO Small Business Group will be a requirement for the design services The consultant is responsible for the cost and execution of all applicable municipal design permits and approval including City of Houston requirements. Page 4 of 5 CS Fire Suppression Design Scope (04/11/2014)

50 3.4. The consultant will be required to perform the following tasks: Provide a detailed design schedule, including milestone submittal dates Provide a weekly update of the design progress Provide an engineer s recommendation on any environmental issues or concerns Final Design - Deliverable will be a City of Houston Approved Bid Package including plans, specifications and final version of the engineer s opinion of probable construction cost. METRO should be able to use this deliverable to prepare bidding documents Provide an engineer s estimated construction cost and duration in accordance with the final design The time of completion for final design is 60 calendar days. 4. The consultant will meet with the METRO Project Manager and the customer for a pre-scoping meeting to talk about the project in general, followed by a site visit. The intent is to facilitate the consultant to visualize the project and come up with a realistic scope of services. 5. The scope of services, including fee proposal and schedule, are due to the METRO Project Manager within two weeks of request for proposal. END OF SCOPE Page 5 of 5 CS Fire Suppression Design Scope (04/11/2014)

51

52 BOARD BRIEFING SUMMARY SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #: Hardy Yards Burnett Transit Center AGENDA DATE: 12/18/14 DEPARTMENT: Planning, Engineering and Construction PRESENTER: Roberto Treviño, P.E. SUMMARY: As per Board request at the November Capital Programs Committee meeting, Cypress Development will present their ultimate plan to include: 1) Overview of the Hardy Yards development, 2) Status of projects under-construction, including scheduling of a. Re-opening of Main Street intersection, b. Completion and re-opening of Burnett Street from Fulton to Hardy

53 BOARD BRIEFING SUMMARY SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM #: Fare Collection System AGENDA DATE: 12/18/14 DEPARTMENT: PRESENTER: Planning, Engineering & Construction Clint Harbert SUMMARY: The briefing will provide an overview on typical fare collection systems for street running Light Rail Transit and Bus Rapid Transit. The presentation will provide both national and international examples of systems using proof of payment and pay on entry techniques. Advantages and disadvantages of each will be highlighted. Potential issues and costs associated with a pay on entry approach on METRO Light Rail Transit facilities will be included.

54 Fare Collection System December 2014 Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

55 Two fare collection systems used for light rail and bus rapid transit service Pay on entry Proof of payment Presentation will describe each system and their associated advantages and disadvantages 2

56 Istanbul Light Rail Station 3

57 Curitiba Bus Rapid Transit Station 4

58 Bogata Bus Rapid Transit Station 5

59 DART Light Rail Station 6 6

60 Portland Light Rail Station 7

61 METRO Light Rail Station 8 8

62 Pay on entry system Advantages Lower fare evasion rates Lower labor cost for fare collection Disadvantages Higher capital cost for stations Typically more right-of-way required Proof of payment system Advantages Lower capital cost for stations Minimizes right-of-way requirements Ease of access for mobility impaired Disadvantages Higher fare evasion rates Higher labor cost for fare enforcement 9

63 It is industry practice for light rail transit First used in Germany and Switzerland in the 1960s US Light Rail Transit systems include: Baltimore, MD MTA Dallas, DART Los Angeles, LACMTA (Blue & Green Lines) Portland, Tri Met Sacramento, RTD Salt Lake City, UTA San Diego Trolley (1 st in US in 1981) St. Louis, BSDA/SCCTD 10

64 Estimated capital cost to retrofit Light Rail Transit stations open or under construction with enclosure and edge barrier is approximately $250M (FY13 dollars) Based on 63 stations and 84 platform edges Based on similar barrier separation in Vancouver, BC Doesn t include engineering or administrative soft costs Doesn t include Uptown Bus Rapid Transit stations Fire and life/safety issues associated with evacuating passengers requirements High maintenance costs 11

65 Further examine implementation or expand research at Capital Programs Committee s direction. 12