LONG BRIDGE - PRESENT & FUTURE: A MULTIMODAL ANALYSIS

Transcription

1 LONG BRIDGE - PRESENT & FUTURE: A MULTIMODAL ANALYSIS Review of the Potomac River Crossing a Rail Resource for the Washington, DC Region and Beyond Presenter: Edward La Guardia P.E. Michael Baker International

2 Two track multi-span railroad bridge crossing the Potomac River between Washington, DC and Arlington VA. Significant history of construction, modification and rehabilitation. The current bridge was constructed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

3 The only railroad access connecting the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Virginia (Virginia). All rail traffic from AMTRAK, Virginia Railway Express and CSX freight along with Norfolk-Southern (NS) through trackage rights utilize this bridge.

4 1809: Opened 1814: Burned and restored to service in s: Freight drawn by horse 1863: Parallel structure built for locomotive use 1870: Federal government ceded control of Long Bridge to the Pennsylvania Railroad 1904: New structure built and after 1906 the 1863 structure was demolished 1918: Pennsylvania Railroad officially became the owner 1942: Current Upgrades and improvements as dictated by World War II 1962: Last Time Swing Span opened (struck by lightning in 1978) 1968: Combined ownership with merger of New York Central and Pennsylvania Railroad, which formally became Conrail in : CSX Transportation, Inc. acquired ownership * National Park Service owns the landings and riverbed **Navigable channel maintained by the U.S. Coast Guard

5

6 Facts related to bridge in service: Bridge length 2,529 feet 22 through girder spans and a double span swing truss for a total of 24 spans Two tracks approximately 36-6 wide (narrows to ~28-8 at the swing trusses) The vertical clearance is limited to 21 at the swing trusses

7

8 Evaluation included extensive stakeholder/public involvement, purpose and need of improvements, selection/evaluation different rail and non-rail alternatives. Additional multimodal options include high-speed and intercity passenger rail, commuter rail, freight rail, transit, vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic.

9 1. Track Configuration 2 existing rail tracks, rehabilitated 2 existing + 1 new rail track 2 existing + 2 new rail tracks 2 existing + 2 new rail tracks + streetcar/transit 2. Modes Freight Passenger/Intercity/Commuter High Speed Rail (HSR) Streetcar Bus/Rapid Transit General-Purpose Bicycle/Pedestrian

10 3. Distance/Travel Market Local Regional Long Distance 4. Footprint Existing Footprint Expanded Footprint New Footprint 5. Alignment Options southeast of existing bridge Options northwest of existing bridge

11 6. Span Types Bascule Swing Vertical lift Retractable Low level fixed High level fixed 7. Bridge Types Deck Arch Through Arch Suspension Truss Cable Stay Girder Bi-level Bridge Tunnel Extradosed/Cable-stayed 8. Aesthetics and Architecture Pier Treatments Deck Treatments

12

13

14 ALT 8 (A) Streetcar Connection to Maryland Avenue SW ALT 8 (A) Streetcar Connection to Maine Avenue SW Streetcar connection to Long Bridge Park, Convention Center, and Columbia Pike streetcar line Bike/Ped pathway to Park General Purpose Street Tidal Basin/SW Waterfront Bike/Ped Mt. Vernon Trail Bike/Ped Ohio Drive Bike/Ped

15 Deck Arch Tied Arch

16 Through Arch Extradosed Cable-Stayed

17 Rail service options are developing further into VA. VRE, AMTRAK, increasing freight demands and future High Speed Rail service. L'Enfant Plaza Station Crystal City Station

18

19 Scenario Tracks Daily Freight Trains Daily Passenger Trains Daily Trains Typical Delay% Passenger Freight Passenger On-Time Performance Existing 2-Track % 30.7% 99.0% Track % 30.1% 99.0% 4-Track 0.9% 5.1% 99.0% 2-Track 3.4% 72.1% 97.0% Track % 45.3% 98.2% 4-Track 1.8% 6.4% 98.5% Typical Delay and On-Time Performance under optimal conditions without any introduction of randomized incidents or delays

20 Virginia Waterfront Potomac Park L Enfant Plaza Southwest Waterfront Long Bridge structure

21 Along with the existing two track bridge structure capacity of rail infrastructure rail systems on both sides of river crossing Increased local area development requiring passenger rail access Interlocking improvement considerations for better freight movement through area

22

23 Improvements in DC interlocking changes island platform passenger station at the existing L Enfant Plaza

24 Complexity of tracking construction to accommodate right-of way restrictions KEY EXISTING BRIDGE PROPOSED BRIDGE EXISTING TWO-TRACKS PROPOSED TWO-TRACKS

25 CSX interlocking and sidings in Virginia south of the bridge Land directly south of bridge - National Park Service passenger station access at Crystal City Station Island Platform

26

27

28

29

30 The environmental review and resource identification process provided identification of the following: Sensitive resources per current regulatory requirements Review potential fatal flaws for any of the build alternatives Possible future studies needed to obtain environmental clearances per NEPA requirements & related environmental regulations and executive orders Areas identified are the same as the typical NEPA process

31 Land Use Community Facilities and Services Environmental Justice Air Quality Noise and Vibration Hazardous Materials Section 106 Historic Resources Section 4(f) and 6(f) Resources Aesthetics Water Resources Protected Species and Critical Habitat Federal Action and Permits

32 Study/Analysis options; Current & future freight, passenger rail, other modal needs Bridge - Major study results: Important resource for local, regional, and national passenger & freight traffic Existing Long Bridge requires inspection and maintenance, and future major rehabilitation to remain in service The existing bridge poses operational challenges. The structure width and condition limits any expansion

33 Future service considerations: accommodate double-stacked trains. accommodate electrified trains. provide service for future high-speed rail routes Multiple modes were studied to consider meeting the current and future high transportation demand generated throughout the study area. Potential non-rail modes will require safety provisions/physical separation/separate bridge spans.

34 Long Bridge is adjacent to the District s monumental core. Future designs should complement the District s historic and monumental context/architecture. The Long Bridge is located within several sensitive environmental resources. The national parks, historic landmarks/areas, and water bodies, requiring analysis. Any future extensive improvements, reconstruction, or replacement, including tunnels would require substantial funding.

35