CIMEC C-ITS STANDARDISATION REQUIREMENTS FOR URBAN ENVIRONMENT

Transcription

1 This project has received funding from the European Union s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No CIMEC C-ITS STANDARDISATION REQUIREMENTS FOR URBAN ENVIRONMENT STANDARDISATION WORKSHOP (I)

2 WORKSHOP S PROGRAM Time slot 11:00-11:15 Welcome Activity Moderator/presenter and (panel members) Osama Al-Gazali 11:15-12:00 Presentations: Regional perspectives on standardisation 1. UR:BAN: R&D-German project on cooperative ITS services, funded by ministry of economics and energy 2. Use Case for a UK Local Authority: Improving Signals using C-ITS 12:00-12:45 Presentation (two parts): Assessment of relevant ITS/C-ITS standards Bernd Noll and Gav Jackman Osama Al-Gazali C-ITS potential/expected impact on urban mobility 12:45-13:00 Coffee - 13:00-13:45 Panel discussion (Part I): How to ensure that the list of relevant ITS/C- ITS standards and current standardisation activities meet cities Josef Kaltwasser requirements? (Fischer, Jackman, and Williams) 13:45-14:30 Lunch & coffee 14:30-15:15 Panel discussion (Part II): Which additional standards (missing standards) may be needed to exploit the full C-ITS potential/expected impact on urban mobility? Josef Kaltwasser (Fischer, Williams and Araghi) 15:15-15:30 Summary and closure Osama Al-Gazali 2

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT CIMEC - WP 2 Introduction C-ITS STANDARDISATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CITIES Mission & Objectives Approach Assessment of relevant C-ITS/ITS standards Recommendations C-ITS POTENTIAL/EXPECTED IMPACT ON URBAN MOBILITY Input for panel discussion part (I) Input for panel discussion part (II) 3

4 ABOUT CIMEC WP 2 4

5 ABOUT CIMEC CIMEC stands for C-ITS for Mobility in European Cities is a city-focussed project, funded by the EU HORIZON 2020 Research and Innovative Programme, and runs from May 2015 to April 2018 Some Objectives of CIMEC are developing an understanding of the challenges, enablers, barriers and strategies for use of C- ITS solutions in European cities bridging the gap between C-ITS development and deployment through city-focused discussion of the most relevant applications of C-ITS technology The main output eventually is developing a realistic roadmap for city deployment of C-ITS, taking into account.. the goals and constrains of cities product emergence and commercial expectations of suppliers 5

6 ABOUT WP 2 TASK 2.4 WP2 is a work package titled Potential C-ITS solutions and standardisation for urban environment (cities) Input for the WP 3 C-ITS roadmap It aims at identifying potential (current and future) markets for cooperative ITS solutions with specific benefits in the urban environment, identifying how emerging standards for C-ITS will affect, and should respond to, the systems and processes in the urban environment. This workshop is contributing to the second objective!! 6

7 C-ITS STANDARDISATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT: MISSION & OBJECTIVES AND APPROACH 7

8 MISSION This task is addresses the following questions: how emerging standards for C-ITS will affect, and should respond to, the systems and processes in the urban environment? how existing and also future ITS/C-ITS standards, which are relevant for cities, can be made transparent and understandable so that cities know where and how to use and apply them? Results are fed as recommendations into ITS-standardisation organisations 8

9 OBJECTIVES The addressed task is clarifying how C-ITS will be integrated in cities ITS architecture and identifying standardisation issues that currently are not reflected. This could relate to (sub-) systems, communication or processes. And, thereby, highlighting the significance in relation to existing (regional) ITS standards (OCIT, OTS, UTMC, DATEX II etc.) and urban procurement processes. evaluates relevant ITS and C-ITS standards, e.g. the list Release 1 standards for Cooperative ITS by CEN and ISO (N196), which have to meet cities requirements and.. Provides recommendations for further standardisation as a contribution to the work program of WG16 (C-ITS) new WG17 (Urban) of CEN278 9

10 APPROACH Release 1 (CEN/ISO) CEN/ETSI report on M/453 C-ITS Platform (WG7) PT1701 (Final Report) others (e.g. TEAM D 6.5.1) Task 2.4 WP 1 City status and (standardisation) requirements for C-ITS Deployment 1.1 Shortlist and assessment of existing ITS/C-ITS standards (D 2.4) 1.2 Impact of C-ITS deployment on the future urban mobility (input for step 3) 2. Validation of the desk research in expert workshops phrasing of recommendations 3. Identifying further standardisation tasks (incl. missing standards) Phase 1 (desk research) Workshop (I) Workshop (II) Phase 2 (analysis and conclusion) = D2.4/2.5 10

11 ASSESSMENT OF RELEVANT C-ITS/ITS STANDARDS 11

12 ASSESSMENT PROCESSES Pre-selection Standards Expert judgement Evaluated list of relevant standards Initial use cases of WP 1 Bus prioritisation at signalised intersection as supporting example 12

13 ASSESSMENT PROCESSES: EXPERT JUDGMENT AND CRITERIA 1. Pre-selection 2. Pre-processing (2 rounds) C-ITS Platform Standards Release 1 by CEN/ISO (N196) CEN/ETSI report on M/453 Urban ITS (PT 1701) Other sources (EU projects) Expert judgement (criteria) Key shortlist of urban ITS/C-ITS standard s To be discussed in the panel discussion (part I) 3. Prioritisation Prioritised list Expert validation (at the workshop) 13

14 ASSESSMENT PROCESSES: PRE-SELECTION Pre-selection of relevant standards was based on various existing and relevant lists of standards First step Urban ITS C-ITS The result was then matched against the standardisation programme for urban standardisation that has been published by project team PT1701 as the basis for the work program for CEN's new working group WG17 on Urban ITS. Other relevant sources were also cross-checked Second step Then, standards in this list were assessed from an urban road operator's perspective; i.e. find standards that road operators have to actually work with in the process of deploying, operating and maintaining C-ITS services 14

15 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA # Criteria Description 1 Interoperability with legacy system Important requirement to open up pragmatic migration paths in C-ITS service deployment Convergence with existing services (functional) Road Operators provide various service via multiple end user channels; new C-ITS services will partly have overlap with existing services and Road 2 Operators must ensure consistency between the information provided to end users via multiple channels Consistent terminology (data dictionary / ontology) Compliance with service policies and business processes Relevance of subject matter for public road authority s processes and requirements Consistent data structures across system boundaries are a major requirement for system integration; new C-ITS systems have to make sure that they fit consistently into the overall structure Road Operators already provide services and they have their own policies and business processes in delivering these services, defining roles and responsibilities, etc; new C-ITS services have to fit into this scheme We want to identify standards that need to be actively addressed by the road operator when deploying C-ITS services; technical standards (esp. communication standards) of lower conceptual layers may be important for systems to work, but do not need to be particularly addressed in business processes 15

16 ASSESSMENT Pre-selection Standards Expert judgement Evaluated list of relevant standards Initial use cases of WP 1 Bus prioritisation at signalised intersection as supporting example 16

17 BUS PRIORITISATION AS EXAMPLE(2) 17

18 RECOMMENDATIONS 18

19 RECOMMENDATION (1) Standard already in use in urban ITS that need to be adapted. Establish a suitable platform for industry-led national or regional SDOs in charge of existing urban standards that are currently planned to be addressed in the future on European level by an ESO to address issues like mutual awareness, backwards compatibility, migration paths, common cross-referencing, parallel evolution, etc. And to keep cities informed about any conclusions drawn and explain the future relationship between continued action of national / regional SDOs and parallel activities on ESO level. The probability of success of such work items in ESOs would highly benefit from the stakeholders in the existing standardisation activities sending experts to the new ESO work items. 19

20 RECOMMENDATION (2) C-ITS standards that might limit the functionality in urban use cases. Consider all possible means to enable urban road operators to build-up technical as well as financial capacity to contribute to required standardisation Financial capacity could be stimulated by funding / co-funding schemes particularly addressing such standardisation activities. Technical capacity could be created by dedicated actions to develop guidelines, online educational services, but also by raising awareness which standards require road operator contribution and how this contribution could be established 20

21 RECOMMENDATION (3) Standards that have impact on urban operators business processes Agree on the full list of standards falling into this category and stimulate road operator contribution to the respective standardisation activities. Instruments to raise awareness and stimulate contribution would be needed. 21

22 RECOMMENDATION (4) Standards supporting procurement Launch a dedicated activity to describe required testing specification for C-ITS services and equipment for road operators. Extend described supporting actions to build-up technical capacity (and maybe also financial capacity) to test standards and testing as a whole. 22

23 C-ITS POTENTIAL/EXPECTED IMPACT ON URBAN MOBILITY 23

24 POTENTIAL/EXPECTED IMPACT ON URBAN MOBILITY Even though (C-ITS) is a small market, it can disrupt/change the current business of ITS and opens up a new value chain due to its potential of bringing what ITS can not provide or at least optimise existing ITS services. Generally, it is expected that C-ITS has positive impact on: urban road safety for all road users, including VRU and reducing traffic emission and optimising traffic flow. Providing personalised information tailored to the need of individuals taking into account the collective public road authority policy(ies) C-ITS provide a platform for communication between different modes of transport C-ITS is an opportunity for migration paths and interoperability 24

25 INITIAL CITIES REQUIREMENTS (FROM ONGOING ACTIVITY OF WP 1) # Topic Use case (draft) Comment/question 1 2 Speed management Safety Dynamic management of speed information by providing contextual speed, for instance when children getting into/leaving schools Green lights for designated vehicles (police, emergency vehicle /and Fire/rescue vehicles) Minimising traffic distraction 25

26 INITIAL CITIES REQUIREMENTS (FROM ONGOING ACTIVITY OF WP 1) # Topic Use case (draft) Comment/question Logistic (mainly Management of loading and unloading area 3 trucks of different types) for distribution vehicles Urban access regulations and Low emission zones Addressed within the urban-its PT-1701, Was there any considerations of C-ITS? 4 Urban access monitoring Regulation of access to free lanes, e.g. for electric vehicle or HOV. Dynamic usage of road lanes upon public road authority s policies Monitoring of HGVs with dangerous goods, e.g. in Tunnel Addressed within the urban-its PT-1701, Was there any considerations of C-ITS? 26

27 WORKSHOP S PROGRAM Time slot 11:00-11:15 Welcome Activity Moderator/presenter and (panel members) Osama Al-Gazali 11:15-12:00 Presentations: Regional perspectives on standardisation 1. UR:BAN: R&D-German project funded by ministry of economics and energy 2. Use Case for a UK Local Authority: Improving Signals using C-ITS 12:00-12:45 Presentation (two parts): Assessment of relevant ITS/C-ITS standards Bernd Noll and Gav Jackman Osama Al-Gazali C-ITS potential/expected impact on urban mobility 12:45-13:00 Coffee - 13:00-13:45 Panel discussion (Part I): Josef Kaltwasser How to ensure that the list of relevant ITS/C-ITS standards and current (Fischer, Jackman, and Williams) standardisation activities meet cities requirements? 13:45-14:30 Lunch & coffee 14:30-15:15 Panel discussion (Part II): Josef Kaltwasser Which additional standards (missing standards) may be needed to exploit the full C-ITS potential/expected impact on urban mobility? (Fischer, Williams and Araghi) 15:15-15:30 Summary and closure Osama Al-Gazali 27

28 OUR PARTNERS 28

29 Thank you! 29