INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Transcription

1 INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN Town of Jackson and Teton County transportation performance measures but, first Des Moines Area MPO July 9 10, 2013 transporta5on planners transporta5on planners engineering solu5ons more engineering solu5ons transportation planners? public frustra5on 1

2 how Iowans feel about public transit best prac5ces European know- how work methodology tomorrow plan morning technical workshop leadership luncheon methodology tomorrow plan agenda tonight wednesday agenda tonight 2

3 5 pathways 1. sustainability 2. new transportation era 3. federal guidance transportation economics environment energy sustainability health equity 1. sustainability NCHRP report 708 asset management cost of travel, cost of travel + housing governmental efficiency job growth greenhouse gas emissions air quality/pollutant emissions water quality land habitat petroleum dependence use of alternative energy energy intensity (btu per capita) technology economics environment energy personal injury accidents fatal crashes obesity, disease active living access to jobs access to healthy foods access to services distribution of transportation impacts housing + transportation costs community involvement health equity 2. new transportation era 3

4 United States Popula5on & VMT % 500% Pop. VMT 400 millions trillions VMT Growth 5 Year Increments 31% VMT 20% 20 17% 13% 14% 12% United States 12% United States Transit Ridership Growth 5 Year Increments 20 15% 15% % - 3% % 7% 8% - 3% - 2% 6% 3% Per Capita VMT 2004 Pivot 10,000 the push Demographics & Economics What Drives VMT? Traffic Enablers the pull demographics & economics what s the trend? Traffic Enablers 8,000 Labor Force Par5cipa5on Rate Miles of Roadways Labor Force Par5cipa5on Rate Miles of Roadways 6,000 Household Income Energy Cost Subsidy Household Income Energy Cost Subsidy 4,000 Driver License Rate Road Subsidy Driver License Rate Road Subsidy 2,000 Vehicle Ownership Sprawl Vehicle Ownership Sprawl Popula5on Auto Dependency Popula5on Auto Dependency VMT and GDP rural cities cities suburbs suburbs centers development pa_erns in US history Source: Growing Wealthier Smart Growth, Climate Change and Prosperity January 2011 Center for Clean Air Policy 3. federal guidance 4

5 surface transporta5on program 1956 original federal aid to highways act FAHA, first highway revenues act 1961 first federal appropria5on for transit (housing act) 1964 first federal aid to urban mass transit (UMTA) 1973 FAHA created MPOs 1982 surface transporta5on authoriza5on act - 1 to transit 1991 ISTEA 1998 TEA three temporary extensions 2005 SAFETEA- LU ten temporary extensions 2012 MAP- 21 national goals & performance- based planning asset management national highway performance program national goals in legislation USDOT to establish performance targets purpose: to guide planning focused primarily on highways directed at state dots and mpos national goals & performance- based planning 1. safety 2. infrastructure condition 3. congestion reduction 4. system reliability 5. freight movement and economic vitality 6. environmental sustainability 7. project delivery national goal areas Interstate highway performance National Highway System (NHS) performance Interstate pavement condition NHS pavement condition NHS bridge condition Fatalities and injuries per vehicle mile traveled Number of fatalities and injuries Metropolitan congestion On- road mobile source emissions Freight movement on Interstate highways Transit safety Transit state of repair required performance measures USDOT rule making April 2014 states establish targets April 2015 reporting starts October 2016 implementation schedule these plans must address state targets: metropolitan transportation plans metropolitan transportation improvement program (TIP) statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) state asset management plans state performance plans under CMAQ performance targets due within 180 days of state targets (10/2015) mpo sets performance targets in relation to state performance measures mpo must coordinate with state & transit providers in se_ing targets mpo performance measures tomorrow plan DART Forward MAP- 21 process Iowa DOT performance targets Des Moines Area MPO performance measures 5

6 (not your father s transportation program) 1. sustainability 2. new transportation era 3. federal guidance methodology tomorrow plan new transportation era agenda tonight planning systems measurement causation internal vs external outputs vs outcomes reporting (accountability) vision goals objectives metrics plan & program accountability strategies programs, studies, ordinances, projects methodology planning systems performance monitoring & reporting output outcomes vision goals objectives metrics performance monitoring & reporting project accountability strategies eis, ea, cis, aa projects output outcomes before & after accuracy baseline starting point metrics benchmark peers target cost measurement action project effect regulation pricing, taxes, fees maintenance traffic operations mode share expenditures emissions causation outcome health environment economy energy 6

7 build bike lanes vehicular travel street design (easy to measure) increased bicycling (can be observed, but there are many causes) reduced obesity (affected by fleet efficiency, fuel type, vehicle speeds) air pollution emissions (can be estimated, but not observed) air quality (width, lanes, intersections, turns, access, signalization) crashes (can be observed, but there are many causes) fatalities active living example (can be observed, but there are many causes) air quality example (can be observed, but many causes) street safety example (can be observed but there are many causes) example: Iowa DOT Performance Report example: Iowa DOT Performance Report example: Iowa DOT Performance Report % of time IT network is available % of employee evaluations current % of light fleet into service within time standard % of officer s crash reports submi_ed electronically # of fraud investigations conducted # of commercial vehicle safety inspections miles of new shoulders awarded for construction % of programmed projects let for construction # of fraud investigations conducted # of commercial vehicle safety inspections miles of new shoulders awarded for construction % of programmed projects let for construction internal vs. external internal vs. external outputs vs. outcomes example: Iowa DOT Performance Report internal external outputs % of highway miles tolerable sufficiency rating average pavement condition interstate routes average pavement condition other primary routes % of rail miles able to carry heavy unit trains outcomes outputs vs. outcomes performance measures pitfalls source: Transportation for America 7

8 (accessibility + credibility) reporting 1. no growth in long- term vehicle traffic 2. reduce SOV travel to 25 % of trips 3. reduction in mobile source emissions percent of roadways congested (LOS F) 5. expand fiscally viable transportation alternatives for all residents & employees, including elderly & those with disabilities 6. increase transportation rate of employee growth Boulder TMP example major goal Boulder TMP major goal Boulder TMP diagnostic data major goal Boulder TMP Boulder TMP Boulder TMP 8

9 diagnostic data balanced scorecard Charlo_e will be: The safest large city in America The most prosperous for all citizens A city of great neighborhoods The premier city for integrating land use and transportation choices A city of environmental stewardship Boulder TMP Charlo_e, NC CDOT balanced scorecard system effectiveness economic impacts environmental impacts social equity CDOT balanced scorecard Capital Area MPO Austin, TX Capital Area MPO Austin, TX Capital Area MPO Austin, TX Capital Area MPO Austin, TX Capital Area MPO Austin, TX 9

10 Chicago MPO 1. long- term economic development 2. congestion 3. work trip commute time 4. mode share 5. job- housing access 6. air quality 7. energy use 8. natural resource preservation 9. infill and reinvestment 10. peak period utilization 11. facility condition (highways only) CMAP performance measures CMAP example Florida DOT Florida DOT Washington State DOT Oregon State DOT Virginia State DOT 10

11 what is the objective? what is the source of the objective? what is the indicator? where does indicator data come from? what are the baseline and target? how are we doing? analysis: why? methodology tomorrow plan tomorrow plan DART Forward Iowa DOT performance targets Des Moines Area MPO performance measures keys to reporting agenda tonight MAP- 21 process increased service frequencies reduced travel time more crosstown service more flex routes incremental service hours incremental service miles incremental service cost ridership key elements operating plan metrics build a market- based network refocus service network enhance customer experience build financial sustainability guiding principles Goal 1: Improve the safety of Iowa s transportation systems. Goal 2: Improve the quality of Iowa s transportation systems and what they provide. Goal 3: Improve internal and external customer service. Goal 4: Improve the effectiveness of our workplaces. Iowa DOT Goals (2012) 1. safety 2. infrastructure condition 3. congestion reduction 4. system reliability 5. freight movement and economic vitality 6. environmental sustainability 7. reducing project delivery delays national goal areas 11

12 1. create a resilient regional economy 2. improve the region s environmental health and access to the outdoors 3. further the health and well- being of all residents in the region 4. increase regional cooperation and efficiency at all levels resilient regional economy environmental health access to outdoors health of residents well- being of residents regional cooperation efficiency 1. reporting only 2. guide development of tip 3. guide development of lrtp tomorrow plan goals tomorrow plan Des Moines MPO options objectives candidate projects universe of projects candidate projects lrtp objectives programs tip funding allocation long range transportation plan transportation improvement program wrap up objectives metrics overview briefing recap morning outcomes discussion Thursday morning Thursday leadership lunch Des Moines Area MPO July 9 10,

13 INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN Charlo_e Balanced Scorecard h_p://charmeck.org/city/charlo_e/transportation/divisionsandcontacts/documents/bsc%20fy10%20year- end%20perf%20rpt %20to%20Budget(final).pdf h_p://charmeck.org/city/charlo_e/budget/documents/city%20of%20charlo_e%20balanced%20scorecard.pdf NCHRP Report 708: A Guidebook for Sustainability Performance Measurement for Transportation Agencies h_p:// City of Redmond, WA Mobility Report Card Chicago MPO (CMAP) h_p:// City of Boulder, Colorado mode share report and transportation use measurement h_p:// h_p:// Growing Wealthier wealthier/ MAP- 21 / Active Transportation Measurement Austin Capital Metro Washington DOT Gray Notebook Florida DOT MAP- 21 Performance Measures Report 21/MAP- 21PerformanceReport.pdf Oregon DOT Performance Dashboard Virginia DOT Performance Dashboard links www. dashboard.virginiadot.org/ 13