Brigil Homes. Noise Impact Assessment. Type of Document Site Plan Submission. Project Name Petrie s Landing, Phase 2. Project Number OTT A0

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Brigil Homes. Noise Impact Assessment. Type of Document Site Plan Submission. Project Name Petrie s Landing, Phase 2. Project Number OTT A0"

Transcription

1 Brigil Homes Noise Impact Assessment Type of Document Site Plan Submission Project Name Petrie s Landing, Phase 2 Project Number Prepared By: exp Services Inc Queensview Drive Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6 Canada Date Submitted December 2013 (Revision 2)

2 exp Services Inc. Brigil Homes Petrie s Landing, Phase 2 Brigil Homes Noise Impact Assessment Type of Document: Site Plan Submission Project Name: Petrie s Landing, Phase 2 Project Number: Prepared By: exp Queensview Drive Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6 Canada T: F: Jason Fitzpatrick, P. Eng. Project Engineer Infrastructure Services Date Submitted: Bruce Thomas, P. Eng. Senior Project Manager Infrastructure Services

3 Brigil Homes Petrie s Landing, Phase 2 Legal Notification This report was prepared by exp Services Inc. for the account of Brigil Homes. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Exp Services Inc. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this project.

4 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction References Sound Level Criteria Vehicular Traffic Noise Aircraft/Airport Noise Stationary Noise Traffic Information Noise Prediction Summary of Results Indoor Noise Control Measures Mitigation Measures Recommendations i

5 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa List of Appendices Appendix A Figures Appendix B Architectural Drawings Appendix C Stamson Output List of Tables Page Table 2-1: MOE and City of Ottawa Indoor and Outdoor Criteria for Noise From Traffic... 2 Table 2-2: Outdoor, Ventilation & Warning Clause Requirements Road Noise, Daytime ( )3 Table 2-3: Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements Road Noise, Nighttime ( )... 3 Table 2-4: Building Component Requirements Road Noise, Daytime ( )... 4 Table 2-5: Building Component Requirements Road Noise, Nighttime ( )... 4 Table 2-6: Warning Clauses... 5 Table 3-1: Traffic and Road Parameters (AADT Traffic Volumes)... 7 Table 5-1: Location of Receivers... 9 Table 5-2: Summary of Noise Results... 9 Table 5-3: Summary of Noise Levels at Building Facade... 9 Table 6-1: AIF Values and Typical Building Treatments for Road Traffic...10 Table 7-1: Summary of Requirements...11 List of Figures Page Figure 1: Overall Site Location Map... Appendix A Figure 2: Noise Source, Receiver Locations... Appendix A ii

6 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa 1 Introduction Brigil Homes retained exp Services Inc. to undertake a noise impact assessment in support of a site plan application for a proposed condominium development project, Petrie s Landing, Phase 2 (Tower B), located at 8911 North Service Road in the City of Ottawa, Ontario. Refer to Figure 1 in Appendix A. The site is adjacent to Highway 174 which transitions from a four-lane divided to a two-lane undivided highway. The site is subjected to noise generated from vehicular traffic travelling along Highway 174. No additional noises are expected from aircraft/airport, rail or stationary sources. This report studies noise levels using prediction modeling of volumes generated by vehicular traffic, at the proposed building site. The study was conducted in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and the City of Ottawa Noise Control Guidelines. From the results abatement measures were proposed to help lower the noise to an appropriate level. This noise impact study was prepared to address the following conditions as identified in the City of Ottawa s Noise Control Guidelines: Where a new development is proposed within 100m from the right-of-way of an existing or proposed road arterial, major collector or bus Transitway, 250m of an existing or proposed highway, light rail transit corridor or a secondary main railway line, or 500m from the right-of-wayof a freeway or 400-series provincial highway or a Principal Main railway line, the City will require a noise study to be prepared. 1.1 References A summary of the documents that were referenced during the preparation of this report include the following: Ontario MOE publication LU-131, Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning, and accompanying Annex, dated October Noise Control Guidelines for New Developments Adjacent to Existing and Proposed Regional Roads and Transitways prepared for the former Regional Municipality of Ottawa Carleton (RMOC) dated August 21, City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan, Nov 2008 City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, May 10, Building Practice Note (BPN 56), Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings, National Research Council Canada, dated Sept

7 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa 2 Sound Level Criteria The requirements outlined per the Ministry of Environment (MOE) and the City of Ottawa Guidelines, both have indoor and outdoor sound level limitations generated from road traffic, a summary is provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: MOE and City of Ottawa Indoor and Outdoor Criteria for Noise From Traffic Location, Space & Time Period Indoors Night-time 23:00 to 07:00 sleeping quarters of residences, hospitals, schools, nursing / retirement homes, daycare centers, etc. Equivalent Level Leq (dba) 40 Nighttime 23:00 to 07:00, sleeping quarters of hotels/motels 45 Daytime 07:00 to 23:00, living / dining areas of residences, hospitals schools, nursing/retirement homes, daycare centers, theatre, places of worship, libraries, individual or semi-private offices, conference rooms, reading rooms. General offices, reception areas, retail stores, etc., Daytime 07:00 to 23:00 Outdoors Daytime 07:00 to 23:00, Outdoor Living Areas (OLA) Sounds are measured in decibels (db). To better represent human hearing, very-high and very-low pitched sounds are adjusted or A-weighted (dba). Therefore, traffic noise in this report is measured as dba. Since roadway traffic fluctuates it is convenient to describe the noise generated in terms of an equivalent 24-hour sound level (denoted as Leq). MOE Guidelines require that traffic noise be evaluated in relation to specific locations during certain time periods. In general, noise level predictions are for: outdoor living areas, such as backyard of a residential homes or shared recreational areas, during the day, and indoor areas: living/dining areas during the day and bedrooms during the night-time. A summary of these requirements are shown in Tables 2-2 through

8 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa Table 2-2: Outdoor, Ventilation & Warning Clause Requirements Road Noise, Daytime ( ) ASSESSMENT LOCATION L eq (16 hr) (dba) VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS OUTDOOR CONTROL MEASURES WARNING CLAUSE Outdoor Living Area (OLA) Plane of Living Room Window Less than or equal to 55 Greater than 55 less than or equal to 60 Greater than 60 Greater than 50 less than or equal to 55 Greater than 55 less than or equal to 65 Greater than 65 N/A None required Not required N/A N/A Control measures / barriers not required but could be considered Control measures / barriers required to reduce below 60 dba, as close to 55 dba as technically, economically and administratively feasible Type A Type B None required N/A Not required Forced air heating with central air conditioning provision Central air conditioning N/A N/A Type C Type D Table 2-3: Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements Road Noise, Nighttime ( ) ASSESSMENT LOCATION L eq (8 hr) (dba) VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS WARNING CLAUSE Plane of Bedroom Window Greater than 50 less or equal to 60 Forced air heating, central air conditioning provision Type C Greater than 60 Central Air Conditioning Type D 3

9 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa Table 2-4: Building Component Requirements Road Noise, Daytime ( ) ASSESSMENT LOCATION NOISE SOURCE L eq (16 hr) (dba) WARNING CLAUSE NOTICE Plane of Living Room Window Road Less than or equal to 65 Building compliant with Ontario Building Code Greater than 65 Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Table 2-5: Building Component Requirements Road Noise, Nighttime ( ) ASSESSMENT LOCATION NOISE SOURCE L eq (8 hr) (dba) WARNING CLAUSE NOTICE Plane of Bedroom Window Road Less than or equal to 60 Building compliant with Ontario Building Code Greater than 60 Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria The warning clauses referred to above are also shown in Table 2-6. Specifically, the warning clauses as defined by the MOE and City of Ottawa (italic). Where applicable, these clauses are to be inserted on all Offers / Agreements of Purchase and Sale or Leases to notify potential purchasers and tenants of these environmental concerns. 4

10 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa Table 2-6: Warning Clauses WARNING CLAUSE A B C D Purchasers/Tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality s and the MOE s noise criteria. Purchasers/Tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the MOE s noise criteria. Purchasers/Tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality s and the MOE s noise criteria. Purchasers/Tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing (road) (Transitway) (rail) (air) traffic may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the MOE s noise criteria. This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized to accommodate central air-conditioning. Installation of central air-conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air-conditioning device should be done as to comply with the noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized to accommodate central air-conditioning. Installation of central air-conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the MOE s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor airconditioning device should be done as to comply with the noise criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air-conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality s and the MOE s noise criteria. This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air-conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the MOE s noise criteria. E Purchaser/tenants are advised that due to the proximity of the adjacent industry (facility) (utility), sound levels from the industry (facility) (utility) may at times be audible 5

11 exp Services Inc. Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa Results from the noise prediction modeled for the Plane of the Window (POW) during the daytime and nighttime were used to determine the required building component requirements. Indoor sound levels can be significantly decreased depending on the architectural building materials used for the walls, windows, and, and doors, etc. 2.1 Vehicular Traffic Noise The proposed building is located within 500 meters from the right-of-way of an existing freeway and arterial roadway and therefore per the City s guidelines requires a noise study to be completed. From the Urban Road Network (Map 5) of the Transportation Master Plan the site is adjacent to Highway 174, which is designated as both a city freeway and arterial roadway. East of Trim Road Highway 174 changes from a four lane grade separated freeway to a 2 lane undivided roadway as shown below. Proposed Tower 2 Refer to the Figure 2 in Appendix A for a plan illustrating the receiver locations used. Noise levels were assessed for the south (facing Highway 174), west (towards existing Tower 1), and east faces of the proposed building. In general, noise levels are predicted for: Outdoor living areas (OLAs) during the day; Indoor living/dining areas during the day, and; Bedrooms during the night time. The proposed building has two common amenity areas that meet the definition of an outdoor living area; one a ground level patio, and the second a roof-top patio. 6

12 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa 2.2 Aircraft/Airport Noise The site is located inside the Airport Vicinity Development Zone and outside the Airport Operating Influence Zone as per Schedule K of the Ottawa Official Plan. The site is outside both the 25 NEF and NEP contours therefore noise from air traffic does not impact this site and will not be examined in this report. 2.3 Stationary Noise Typically industrial land uses can be a potential stationary noise source. For the proposed development, a review of the potential industrial noise sources that could be generated by neighboring properties was conducted. Based on the information reviewed it was determined that there were no stationary noise sources. 3 Traffic Information Traffic volumes used in this study were obtained from existing roadway information and from the City of Ottawa s Noise Control Guidelines. Highway 174 which is adjacent to the site transitions from a four-lane divided highway to a two-lane undivided arterial roadway. City of Ottawa Guidelines requires the use of an AADT of 18,333 veh/day per lane for freeways and 15,000 veh/day for 2-lane urban arterial roadways. Since Highway 174 transitions at the site location an AADT of 35,000 veh/day, which is consistent with a 4-lane divided arterial was used as an average. Noise generated from vehicular traffic along this section of the highway was assessed for its potential noise impact. Traffic parameters used for the analysis are summarized in Table 3-1 below. Table 3-1: Traffic and Road Parameters (AADT Traffic Volumes) Traffic Parameters Highway 174 Roadway Classification 4-lane city freeway & 2-lane undivided arterial Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) (veh/day) 35,000 Posted Speed Limit (km/h) 90 km/h 7

13 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa 4 Noise Prediction All noise levels have been predicted using MOE s software and methodology. STAMSON Version 5.03 (1999), which is based on the Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environment and Transportation ( ORNAMENT ) Model, was used for all calculations in this report. Detailed output files are attached in Appendix D for reference. In addition to the traffic data that was used in the analysis, theoretical noise predictions were based on the following information: Truck traffic on all streets and roadways consists of 5% heavy trucks, 7% medium trucks, based on City of Ottawa requirements. The Day/Night split used for roadways and highways was 92% and 8% as per City of Ottawa requirements. Intermediate surfaces between the source and receiver locations were assessed as a reflective ground surface. Topography was assessed as flat/gentle slope. Road pavement and road gradient was assessed as typical asphalt or concrete and flat grade. The noise levels on the roof-top patio was taken at the east edge of the building which would represent the worst case. For all modeling with STAMSON, source and receivers were assumed to be elevated with a reflective separating surface. This ensures that no ground absorption is applied to the prediction results. Therefore when no ground absorption is applied, the predicted sound levels do not increase with the height of the receiver, and the results are the same for all floors. This is a conservative assumption which simplifies the prediction of sound levels on all floors. Noise levels were assessed at the building facade. 8

14 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa 5 Summary of Results A summary of predicted noise levels for various assessment locations is summarized below in Table 5-1. Table 5-1: Location of Receivers Receiver I.D. Receiver Location Distance to Road Centre Line Hwy 174 (m) A Tower B West building façade at south corner of the building facing existing Tower A. Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window B Tower B South building façade facing Highway 174 Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window C Tower B East building façade at south corner of the building facing future Tower C. Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window D Tower B West building façade at north corner of the building facing existing Tower A. Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window E Tower B East building façade at north corner of the building facing future Tower C. Plane of Living/Dining//Bedroom window F Outdoor Living Area (OLA) ground level patio G Outdoor Living Area (OLA) roof-top patio Assessment Location Table 5-2: Summary of Noise Results Combined Equivalent Noise Level L eq (dba) Daytime (0700 to 2300) Nighttime (2300 to 0700) A B C D E F (OLA) 52.2 G (OLA) 58.9 Table 5-3: Summary of Noise Levels at Building Facade Façade Location South Building Façade (facing Highway 174) West Building Façade (facing existing Tower A) East Building Façade (facing Future Tower C) Combined Equivalent Noise Level L eq (dba) Daytime Nighttime (front) to 60.7 (rear) 54.4 (front) to 50.1 (rear) 65.2 (front) to 65.0 (rear) 65.0 (front) to 60.7 (rear) 9

15 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa 6 Indoor Noise Control Measures As the sound levels at the building facades exceed the requirements, building components treatment shall be provided. The appropriate building components are selected on the basis of the Acoustic Insulation Factor (AIF) which is related to the difference in indoor and outdoor levels. The Acoustic Insulation Factor (AIF) needed to control the road traffic noise is calculated as follows: AIF = L eq outdoor façade L eq indoor + 10 log C + 2 Where Leq outdoor façade = Outdoor façade sound level Leq indoor = Indoor objective sound level C = Number of building components forming envelope of room (typically equals 3 for a corner room and 2 for other rooms) Table 6-1 below outlines the AIF required for various road traffic sound levels as well as the glazing requirements to meet MOE guidelines. This table is provided to assist with determining the acoustical insulation factor (AIF) needed for a typical unit, over a range of daytime and nighttime sound levels at the building façade. The final window and wall treatments that will be required to meet the indoor noise level requirements will be made by an a qualified acoustical engineer. Table 6-1: AIF Values and Typical Building Treatments for Road Traffic Daytime Façade Sound Level (dba) Nighttime Facade Sound Level (dba) Air Conditioning Requirement AIF Required 4 Window Treatment 5 Wall Treatment 55 or less 50 or less None 17 or less None (OBC) None (EW1) 56 to to 60 Provisions 18 to 27 None (OBC) None (EW1) 66 to to 63 Required 28 to 30 None (OBC) None (EW1) 69 to to 65 Required 31 to 32 STC 31 to 32 None (EW1) 71 to to 67 Required 33 to 34 STC 33 to 34 EW2 73 to to 73 Required 35 to 40 STC 35 to 40 EW Required 41 STC 41 EW1R / EW5 Notes: 1. Source: Road and Rail Noise: Effects on Housing, NHA 5156, 08/86 CMHC, Building treatment based on an assumed window / floor ratio of 25%, and wall / floor ratio of 80%. 3. AIF is based on 3 components (i.e. corner room location. For 2 components (i.e. only one exterior wall) AIF would be 2 points lower. 4. OBC window: Requires Ontario Building Code compliant construction. 5. EW1 denotes a typical metal or vinyl clad siding exterior wall EW1R denotes an EW1 exterior wall with interior drywall mounted on resilient channels EW2 denotes an EW1 exterior wall with an additional 25mm of rigid insulation EW4 denotes a typical 20mm stucco clad exterior wall EW5 denotes a typical brick veneer clad exterior wall 10

16 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa 7 Mitigation Measures Table 7-1 below summarizes the requirements for ventilation, outdoor control measures and building components for all assessment locations. Using the summary results from Table 5-2 in conjugation with Table 6-1, the building components requirements for the proposed Tower B are identified in Table 7.1 below. Table 7-1: Summary of Requirements Receiver Location Outdoor Living Area Warning Clause Required Control Measures Required Warning Clause Required for Ventilation Building Component Required Day Night Day Night Acoustic Insulation Factor (AIF) Required Window Treatment Wall A - N/A 1 D C NC Comp 28 to 30 B - N/A 1 D C NC Comp 28 to 30 C - N/A 1 D C NC Comp 28 to 30 D - N/A 1 C C Comp Comp 18 to 27 E - N/A 1 C C Comp Comp 18 to 27 F (OLA) G (OLA) Not required A None (OBC) None (OBC) None (OBC) None (OBC) None (OBC) None (Min EW1) None (Min EW1) None (Min EW1) None (Min EW1) None (Min EW1) Not required Control measures / barriers not required but considered Notes: 1. Areas identified as outdoor living areas are too small to be classified as outdoor amenity space. 2. Comp and NC denote, compliant and non-compliant, respectively. 3. OBC denotes required Ontario Building Code compliant construction. 4. EW1 denotes a typical metal or vinyl clad siding exterior wall. The proposed building exterior front walls will be composed of brick and stone, therefore satisfy the wall treatment requirement. Also, the proposed building is designed to have central air conditioning. For the outdoor living area there is no requirement at the ground level patio (location F), however the noise level predicted for the rooftop patio is between 55 and 60 dba. In this case the guidelines dictate that barrier should be considered, but not required. As this outdoor living area is on top of the roof, glass panels will be used as barriers (fence) for fall protection. The height of the barriers will be of standard height, and not provide any noise attenuation at a person s ear level. Therefore only a warning clause to notify residents who use the rooftop patio will be used. 11

17 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa 8 Recommendations We recommend that the Site Plan application for the proposed development be approved from a Noise Study assessment perspective, based on the following: For all Units For all units with the building a Type A warning clause for their outdoor living area (OLA) or amenity space located on the rooftop is required as follows: Type A- Warning Clause (rooftop amenity space) Purchasers/Tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Units facing Highway 174 For all units facing Highway 174, the ventilation requirements for these units require a Type D warning clause. The ventilation requirements are met as the entire building will have a central air conditioner on the rooftop. Building components shall be designed to achieve the indoor sound level requirements. The following Notices on Title shall be included in all Agreements of Purchase and Sale in accordance with the terms specified by the Development Agreement: Type D Warning Clause This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air-conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the MOE s noise criteria. The Transferee covenants with the Transfer or that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included in all subsequent agreements of Purchase and sale and deeds conveying the lands described herein, which covenant shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of subsequent owners of the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road. In addition, a qualified acoustic consultant inspect the building plans for these units and certify that the window and wall components selected for construction are adequate to meet the indoor noise criteria as identified in this report. For remaining units All remaining units the ventilation requirements for these units require a Type C warning clause, with no additional building components requirements. The ventilation requirements are met as the entire building will have a central air conditioner on the rooftop. The following Notices on Title shall be included in all Agreements of Purchase and Sale in accordance with the terms specified by the Development Agreement: Type C Warning Clause This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc. was sized to accommodate central air-conditioning. Installation of central air-conditioning by the occupant will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the City s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air-conditioning device should be done as to comply with the noise 12

18 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa criteria of MOE Publication NPC-216, Residential Air Conditioning Devices and thus minimize the noise impacts on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. The Transferee covenants with the Transfer or that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included in all subsequent agreements of Purchase and sale and deeds conveying the lands described herein, which covenant shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of subsequent owners of the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road. 13

19 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa Appendix A Figures

20 t: f: Queensview Drive, Unit 100 Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6 Canada BUILDINGS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT ENERGY INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE SUSTAINABILITY

21

22 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa Appendix B Architectural Drawings

23

24

25 E.B. SPA POOL GYM ELECTRICAL ROOM E.B. E.B. E.B. WOMEN LOCKERS MECANICAL ROOM MEN LOCKERS CLIENT Client. OUVRAGE Project Petrie's Landing I, Phase 2 TITRE DU DESSIN Drawing Title Roof plan EMPLACEMENT Location NO.PROJET Project No. DATE (aa.mm.jj) ÉCHELLE Scale OTTAWA :200 DESSINE PAR Drawn by VÉRIFIÉ PAR Checked by RÉVISION Revision NO. DESSIN Dwg Number A.B. ANT.C. -- A205 23

26 renderings PETRIE S LANDING I Phase 2, OTTAWA

27 RENDERINGS PETRIE S LANDING I Phase 2, OTTAWA

28 rooftop terrace sketch PETRIE S LANDING I Phase 2, OTTAWA

29 Brigil Construction Limited Petrie s Landing, Phase 2, Ottawa Appendix C Stamson Output

30 RRA STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :16:34 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rra.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): RRA Road data, segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/1232 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 2254/98 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 1610/70 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 90 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: RR174 (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: RR174 (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 1 Page 2

31 RRB STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :48:48 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rrb.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): RRB Road data, segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/1232 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 2254/98 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 1610/70 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 90 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: RR174 (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: RR174 (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 1 Page 2

32 RRC STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :17:23 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rrc.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): RRC Road data, segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/1232 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 2254/98 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 1610/70 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 90 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: RR174 (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: RR174 (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 1 Page 2

33 RRD STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :17:58 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rrd.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): RRD Road data, segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/1232 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 2254/98 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 1610/70 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 90 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: RR174 (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: RR174 (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 1 Page 2

34 RRE STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :34:38 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rre.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): RRE Road data, segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/1232 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 2254/98 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 1610/70 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 90 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: RR174 (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: RR174 (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 1 Page 2

35 RRF STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :15:55 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rrf.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: OLA TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): RRF Road data, segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/1232 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 2254/98 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 1610/70 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 90 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: RR174 (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: RR174 (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 1 Page 2

36 RRG STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: :15:24 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: rrg.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: OLA TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): (NIGHT): RRG Road data, segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Car traffic volume : 28336/1232 veh/timeperiod Medium truck volume : 2254/98 veh/timeperiod Heavy truck volume : 1610/70 veh/timeperiod Posted speed limit : 90 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) Data for Segment # 1: RR174 (day/night) Angle1 Angle2 : deg deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 2 (Reflective ground surface) Receiver source distance : / m Receiver height : / 1.50 m Topography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier) Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: RR174 (day) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Results segment # 1: RR174 (night) Source height = 1.50 m ROAD ( ) = dba Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq Segment Leq : dba Total Leq All Segments: dba Page 1 Page 2