Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) Friday 6 th June 2008

Transcription

1 Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) Friday 6 th June 2008

2 Agenda 1. 11:00 Introductions 2. 11:10 Presentations from guest speakers 3. 12:00(ish) Open question forum 4. 13:30(ish) Lunch

3 Running Order DGCA Peter Griffiths DAP John Arscott Me EXCOM Olaf Dlugi Eurocontrol Dr Erik Merckx SJU Patrick Ky NATS David Hilton

4 SESAR Why?

5 Aviation - an evolving Environment Airspace Users Cost pressure (+fuel) 9/11 and economic downturn Low cost airlines VLJs, UAVs Military operations GA Airports Capacity limitation Society Noise & Climate change Safety Security Sustainable growth Mobility Carbon Emissions ANSPs Corporatisation / privatisation Under pressure of users Supply Industry Concentration Global

6 Traffic expected to double by : 10.5 millions 2010: 12.5 millions 2020: 17.2 millions

7 An ATM System reaching its limits New Solutions from R&D Traffic Ongoing Short/Medium Term Programmes Closing the capacity gap }Gap: need for future system Potential Capacity with current system Capacity with current system A new system is required

8 Background - SESAR SESAR is a project to develop the new generation European ATM System. Its aim is to deliver a new operational platform for ATM for Europe. Joint funding was agreed for the project s first phase by the European Community and Eurocontrol at a total cost of 60m Euros. ATA and stakeholders formed the SESAR Consortium to take the project definition phase forward. Deliverable of the Project Definition Phase is the ATM Master Plan.

9 The three phases of SESAR Definition Development SESAR Phases Deployment SESAR Impact on Operational ATM system

10 Olaf Dlugi

11 D5 SESAR Master Plan Olaf Dlugi The SESAR Definition Phase is co-financed by the European Community and EUROCONTROL

12 SESAR Consortium including EUROCONTROL

13 SESAR overview : The Definition Phase The Market Its Requirements The Top Product How to Build it Action Plan Go! Analyse air transport value and role of ATM D1 Performance Requirements D2 ATM Target Concept selection D3 Deployment sequence analysis D4 Build the ATM Master Plan D5 Define organisation &workprogramme D6 24 months

14 Everything you always wanted to know about the Master Plan One overall plan for all: Plus individual roadmaps & Supporting Changes R&D List of concerned operational or technical changes Implementation Available for Operations Contains Planning information for Deployment and R&D Not a one-off Master Planning process Passed to SJU for execution and maintenance

15 D5 is only the tip of the iceberg Products of the SESAR Definition Phase The SESAR Master Plan D5 Task Deliverables Electronic Master Plan Renewed ECIP/LCIP Agreed strategic guideline Working and Planning area Derived agreed & committed actions

16 Best practices Commitment to deployment now Trajectory based operations preparation R&D Deployment Operations Net-centric trajectory management Commitment to R&D Investment Advanced automation in a shared trajectory environment Advanced separation modes Agreed way Forward Full 4D-trajectory management & self separation

17 Performance Benefits by 2020 The 2020 European ATM system will accommodate 15.8M flights/year; Average improvement of delays by 40 % per flight; Fuel savings (ATM related) of 14 MTons CO2 ATM costs per flight reaches an average of 630/flight;

18 Benefits Societal Benefits (in 2020) Direct, indirect and induced aviation contributions 470Bn /year to European GDP Quantified Operational Benefits (cumulated between ) 8Bn Cost-effectiveness 9Bn Capacity Gain & Delay Reduction 8Bn Fuel cost savings 2Bn Quality of Service - Low visibility Further Benefits Flexibility, Interoperability,

19 CONCLUSION Shared Master Plan Systematic approach to Master Planning

20 Erik Merckx

21 The ATM Master Plan and EUROCONTROL s role UK Stakeholders Forum London, 6 June 2008 Dr. Erik Merckx EUROCONTROL Deputy Director ATM Programmes

22 Overview Traffic and Capacity Profiles ATM Master Plan Framework EUROCONTROL s roles Stakeholder consultation and monitoring mechanisms

23 Traffic and Capacity Profiles % Additional capacity between From to flights / day

24 ATM Master Plan Framework Single European Sky Institutional Framework ATM Master Plan Management Performance Framework Development Framework Support to Regulation & Standardisation Framework Deployment Framework Targets Target Concept & Architecture Common Specifications & Prototypes Draft IR and CS Industry Standards SESAR ATM System Stakeholder Engagement in the Business Framework

25 EUROCONTROL s Roles in the ATM Master Plan Outside SJU Implementation of Short Term Implementation Programmes Inside SJU Responsibilities as Founding Member of the SESAR JU Leading and Contributing to a number of Work Packages as a Member of the SESAR JU Inside and outside SJU Support to Single Sky Legislation

26 EUROCONTROL as SJU Founding Member Manage the cooperative development of the European ATM Network Co-ordinate the overall network validation activities Identify SESAR components for progressive implementation including support to regulatory measures, as required Organise and co-ordinate long term ATM research activities Maintain and up-date the ATM Master Plan, ensuring consistency with other relevant convergence plans Manage horizontal safety activities related to SESAR, including appropriate safety management and safety regulation, the latter in cooperation with EASA Ensure the involvement of all civil/military stakeholders, through adaptation of the relevant EUROCONTROL consultation mechanisms Organise and co-ordinate ATM training in support of SESAR development as appropriate

27 EUROCONTROL Role in IP 1 All implementation programmes that need completion by 2013 That are ongoing And mature. Together with stakeholders That are needed to meet the performance requirements of the ATM at That are the baseline for further R&D work In IP2 and IP3

28 EUROCONTROL Role in IP 1 Examples: CCAMS ESP DMEAN DLINK FASTI CASCADE 8.33 khz Airport CDM ARN V5/V6 Already indicated in D2 to have good CBAs and further qualified in D5

29 EUROCONTROL Role in IP 1 The Agency to complete the IP1 programmes that are in line with the ATM Master Plan Stakeholders to implement the IP1 programmes Update the ECIP to measure performance against IP1 Use the renewed ECIP/LCIP mechanism as a formal, EC approved instrument for States to report against IP1 (SES) achievements

30 EUROCONTROL Role in IP 2 SJU SJU A/1 - WP Management B - Target concept & Architecture D - ATM Network R&D Programme C - Master Plan Maintenance E - LT & Innovative Research DFS 2 - R&D Overall Consistency 16 - Transversal Areas 3 - Validation Infrastructure ENAV 7 - Network Operations 4 - En Route Operations DSNA 5 - TMA Operations NATS 6 - Airport Operations AENA 8 - Information Management LFV 9 - Aircraft Airbus 10 - ATC Indra-Thales 11 - AOC 12 - Airport 14 - SWIM Indra-Selex 13 - NIMS Thales-Selex 15- Gnd CNS Thales-Selex Possible Agency WP leadership Agency WP leadership

31 Stakeholder consultation and monitoring The performance of European ATM Agency performance EUROCONTROL SCG

32 Stakeholder consultation and monitoring The Performance of European ATM EUROCONTROL SCG

33 Patrick Ky

34 SESAR Development London, June 6th 2008

35 The SESAR Joint Undertaking Created by EC Council Reg. N 219/2007 Responsible for the execution of the ATM Master Plan, and in particular the management of the SESAR Development phase Two founding members: the EC and EUROCONTROL Public-private partnership

36 SESAR Work Flows ATM Master Plan (endorsed by EU Ministers, adopted by SJU Admin Board) SJU MP Updates R&D Validation SES Regulation Standardisation Eurocontrol Implementation

37 SJU organisation Exec Director P Ky Comm & stakeholders relations: E Platteau Deputy Exec Director Programme Director Director Admin Finance C. BORGHINI Chief Architect: P. HOTHAM Chief Economist A. SIEBERT Legal C Legal POUZA Chief Ops/ Validation M. STANDAR WOrk Programme Manager F. GUILLERMET Chief Regulatory Affairs HR P COURTOIS HR Finance M DEDIC Finance

38 The SESAR Partnership EU funding (700 M, TEN-T and FP7) and regulatory actions EUROCONTROL funding and in kind contribution (700 M ): alignment of relevant EUROCONTROL activities Industry (700 M +): alignment of business strategy and product development 15 candidate members as part of an initial core group (CFI 07/07) Membership agreements to be signed end 2008 Second round of partnership in

39 Candidate Members (initial core group) ANSPs: AENA, DFS, DSNA, ENAV, NATS, [LFV, Austrocontrol, AVINOR, ISAVIA, IAA, NAVIAIR, FINAVIA, EANS] Manufacturing Industry: AIRBUS, [ALENIA, Galileo Avionica, Telespazio], INDRA, [SELEX SI, SELEX COM], [THALES Air Systems, THALES Avionics], [SINTEF, SAAB, Kongsberg, Park Air Systems, Thrane&Thrane, Airtel ATN], HONEYWELL Airports: SEAC: ADP, BAA, FRAPORT, MUNICH, SCHIPHOL, UNIQUE (AENA, LFV, AVINOR)

40 Indicative Work Programme SJU SJU WP Management Target concept & Target concept Architecture Architecture DFS ATM Network R&D Programme Master Plan Master Plan Maintenance Maintenance EUROCONTROL LT & Innovative LT Innovative Research Research EUROCONTROL R&D Overall Consistency Transversal Areas Transversal Areas EUROCONTROL Validation Validation Infrastructure Infrastructure ENAV Network TMA Information Network TMA Information EUROCONT Operations Management Operations Operations Management ROL NATS LFV En Route Airport Operations En Route Operations Airport Operations Operations DSNA AENA Aircraft Aircraft AIRBUS ATC ATC TH/IN Airport Airport IN/SEL AOC NIMS EUROCO NIMS NTROL SWIM SWIM SEL/TH Grd CNS TH/SEL

41 SESAR JU management principles A small entity, complementary to existing organisations and processes (SES and EUROCONTROL) A delivery-oriented work programme: Concrete deliveries every 1-2 years Pilot projects enable validation of quick wins in different operational environments Need to coordinate with other initiatives: NEXTGEN, ICAO Geared towards implementation: The business case Link with standardisation bodies

42 Other parties involvement Ad Hoc working arrangements to be put in place before end 2008: Airspace users Staff representatives Military Authorities, National Supervisory Authorities, EASA Independent experts External calls for tenders: On specific fields where an external input is necessary: Because of need for independence (e.g. COM study) Because of need for specific technical input (e.g. AOC) On pre-defined topics (e.g. long term research)

43 Conclusion The SESAR definition phase has agreed on a common way forward The Joint Undertaking is a tool pooling resources together into a single programme It is a partnership, and builds its work upon consolidated and aligned activities Working arrangements are being organised to ensure participation of all relevant stakeholders

44 SESAR Joint Undertaking Rue du Luxembourg 3 Brussels Tel:

45 David Hilton

46 NATS SESAR Stakeholders Seminar 6th June

47 NATS (& Europe) Need SESAR! Implementation of SESAR is vital to ensuring the continued growth of civil aviation in UK and European airspace: NATS has some of the busiest airspace in Europe NATS are approaching the airspace projects benefit limit NATS advanced controller tools programme only bridges the capacity gap until circa 2015 The European ATM Network can gain shorter term benefits from knowledge sharing and the sharing of best practices with our European partners in the SESAR JU Future capacity will only be realised through such open collaboration in a performance partnership Advanced 4D Trajectory Management tools are however essential to increase capacity in the longer term Convergence to common methods of operations and architecture roadmaps will increase ANSP efficiency and lower our operating costs Interoperability and standard interfaces will reduce our capital investment programmes

48 NATS Expectations of SESAR SESAR will create a viable, safe, efficient and environmentally acceptable future for European Aviation SESAR will facilitate and act as the catalyst for a true Single European Sky SESAR will enable the early delivery of benefits to our customers SESAR Advanced Concepts will deliver the performance targets we all aspire to

49 European ATM in 2020 YEARS 6 MONTHS DAYS HOURS MINUTES Long-term Planning Medium / Shortterm Planning Execution BDT SBT SBT SBT SBT SBT RBT FLIGHT OBJECT Business Development Trajectory Shared Business Trajectory Reducing Uncertainty Reference Business Trajectory Forecasts, Airline Plans, Schedule Dev, Military Exercises, Major Events Airspace Design Negotiation on: Schedules Airspace, Routes, Resources. Plan refinement: Arrival capacity Departure planning Impacting events Weather Local capacity mgt. Traffic balancing Real time synchronisation Tactical De-Confliction The evolutionary implementation of the SESAR concepts will transform ATM

50 European ATM in 2020 Key Expectations Stable and predictable operation Business Trajectories published well in advance of the day of operation Airspace structures support the preferred trajectories Decisions affecting the network are made collaboratively Resources are managed for the best overall outcome The system has built in resilience for business continuity Deviation from Business trajectory minimised Safety All aircraft intentions and trajectories known and published in real time via data-link Separation assured using Performance Based Navigation (PBN) with containment along published trajectories Controller tactical intervention minimised traffic flows managed rather than controlled Environment No planned airborne holding Ground based delays with engines on < 3mins over actual taxi time from gate to runway Tailored glideslope to reduce local noise & emissions Continuous descent from cruise altitude (min power/min emissions)

51 SESAR - Some Key Must Haves The Products Must be developed along a service and performance driven roadmap, and of course be feasible and affordable Must be interoperable at both a regional and global level Interoperability on its own is not enough alignment of stakeholder roadmaps will be the key to success Must have balanced costs against benefits Must deliver benefits early where feasible but without diverting from the ultimate SESAR goal The Customers Must have a SESAR menu to choose from Must be assured of a clear governance and leadership structure for product development and deployment with their engagement Strengthened The Stakeholders Must commit and ensure that Phase 1 - ECIP/LCIP is delivered Must establish a single European legislative framework Must drive for efficiency and better regulatory principles Must endorse and commit to the Master Plan

52 The Master Plan Visit the e-atm Master Plan Portal at for a detailed and interactive view of the information contained in the ATM Master Plan. This portal will let you: Navigate easily through the complex architecture of the master plan through clickable diagrams and roadmaps Browse the master plan according to predefined categories targeting your specific needs (by chapter, by type of stakeholder, by key performance area, etc.) Access the documentation of the SESAR definition phase through our ATM Master Plan Library Stay informed of latest news and updates through our e-newsletter and RSS services. Provide feedback and suggestions for modification on the content or display of the information available on the portal.

53 Lunch

54 Spares (SCG)

55 SCG/8 14/15 th May 2008 Item 2.6 SES Reporting Working Group Reference: Information Paper SCG/8/IP03 Danny DEBALS LCIP Manager

56 BACKGROUND SCG/2 Agreed to convene an E/LCIP TF to address adaptation to SES and SESAR SCG/4 TF report presented + Action Plan to implement its recommendations is subsequently developed + approved at SCG/5 SCG/6 Reaffirmed the need for avoidance of double reporting (+ later also by SSC), and Agency+EC invited to streamline reporting requirements and find synergies in order to avoid the double reporting SCG/7 SES Reporting WG arrangements presented and approved. SCG requested that SCG members be involved in the WG.

57 Progress since SCG/7 EC (DG-TREN) and Agency experts worked together and drafted proposals on: The approach to translate the (SES) reporting requirements into LCIP-type questions, and already translated a sub-set of these requirements The approach to translate ECIP objectives into SESrelated implementation objectives Specific chapter(s) of the LCIP, with specific signature arrangements, will be devoted to the SES reports The reporting period of the SES Reports will be set per calendar year to synchronise it with the LCIP cycle (also recommended by SSC) Prefilling (where possible) + separate full-guidance This work was presented to the SCG representatives on 30 April, and received full support

58 Next Steps Continue with the work of the Drafting group in the development of the adapted LCIP Template Develop guidance material as appropriate Present progress of the work end of May EC to assess and accept the outcome of the work June 2008 Initial approach for an enhanced ECIP/LCIP mechanism, including updated templates and guidance material, to be presented to stakeholders at SES Reporting Workshop planned for Sep 2008 SES-related implementation objectives to progressively replace existing ECIP objectives where relevant - Two translated SES-related objectives to be introduced into ECIP