THE SESAR PROGRAMME R&I 2020: FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

Transcription

1 THE SESAR PROGRAMME R&I 2020: FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS

2 THE SESAR PARTNERSHIP

3 Change in Air Traffic Management infrastructure is inevitable 3

4 Implementing the Single European Sky Performance Safety Technology Airports Human factor EASA Performance scheme Crisis coord. cell Performance Review Body Functional Airspace Blocks Network Manager National Supervisory Authorities European ATM Master Plan SESAR Joint Undertaking Common projects Airport observatory Specific sectoral dialogue Committee Consultative expert group on social dimension of the SES 4

5 The Fundamental Changes of ATM INTEGRATION OF AIRPORTS Integrating airports - time synchronised operations of surface trajectories and flight turn-around THE 4D TRAJECTORY PRINCIPLE Integrating airspace users flight systems to build predictable time synchronised flight precision THE SYSTEM WIDE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT The Intranet for Air Traffic Management AUTOMATION Human operators concentrate on high value-added tasks COLLABORATIVE NETWORK PLANNING Integrated with airport operations planning and airspace user flight planning

6 An EU framework for modernising ATM SESAR definition ATM Master plan Development & validation Deployment Governance Common projects Deployment programme Incentives

7 The SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU) 2 FOUNDING MEMBERS European Union Eurocontrol 7 EUR 2.1 bio PPP (European Union, Eurocontrol and Industry) 15 other members 13 associate partners = 110 companies in total 20+ countries 3000 people working on SESAR 300+ projects Duration: Dec Recent position of the EU Transport Ministers: FAA visit January extension until 2024, subject to.

8 Unique Public Private Partnership (PPP) Members Associate partners

9 The SJU a unique PPP 2 FOUNDING MEMBERS

10 SJU Involves All Actors A Multi-Stakeholder approach at the heart of our way of working Airports Ground Industry Airborne Industry Air Navigation Service Providers Staff associations Airspace users National Authorities/ Military R&D community

11 THE SESAR PROGRAMME

12 Research-Innovation Prog1 WP-E Prog1 WP3-16, B,C Single European Sky ATM Master Plan The Innovation and R&D Cycle SESAR Solutions Concept development, System development & verification, Validation, Delivery Programme Management & Technical process domains to support and monitor the execution of the R&D cycle

13 Exploratory Research (WPE) Open calls for participation Towards Higher Level of Automation in ATM Mastering Complex Systems Safely Focussing on: Business Agility Decision Support Environment & Meteorology Enabling Change in ATM CNS/ATM (Automation) Operating Concepts The Human Factor 11 Projects 7 PhDs 17 Projects 13 PhDs 3 Projects 6 Projects Overseen by SJU Scientific Committee Information Management, Uncertainty & Optimisation System Architecture & System Design 3 Projects 13

14 Accelerating Change of Air Traffic Management by Regional Forerunners - ACCHANGE Starting point: Implementation of SES initiatives has so far not met expectations Up to now solution seemed to be regulation orientated Research question: How to create the right environment to generate a successful introduction of the new air traffic management technologies? Can change come from within the sector? Methodology What can we learn from parallel experiences? Economic modelling using game theory, concepts of industrial organisation, regional forerunners, etc. 14

15 Scope of Core Programme Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace Satellite based Communication & Navigation Integrated Departure & Arrival Manager Integrated Controller Working Position Complexity Assessment & Resolution Extended AMAN Time based separation Point Merge AMAN & Point Merge Approach Procedures with Vertical Guidance Dynamic vortex separation Continuous Climb & Descent Cruise climb Business & Mission trajectory Trajectory Management Framework Trajectory authorisation & revision using datalink Optimised RNP Low Visibility procedures using satellite GBAS Pilot Enhanced Vision Collision Avoidance Monitoring Airborne Spacing & Separation Performance Based Navigation Cruise climb Free routing Enhanced situational awareness Arrival & Departure Management Advanced Flexible Use of Airspace Enhanced ATFCM Process User Driven Prioritisation Process Ground safety nets Surveillance Ground System Enhancement Enhanced situational awareness Brake to vacate Surface planning & routing Remote Tower Sector Team Operations Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert Conflict Detection & Resolution Integrated Controller Working Position Airport Operations Planning Network Operations Planning System interoperability with air & ground data sharing Enhanced Decision Support Tools

16 R&D PROJECTS PROGRAMME MASTER PLAN How SESAR R&D Delivers Performance Time Based Operations Trajectory Based Operations FAA visit January

17 RELEASE 1 SESAR Solutions 1. Precision Navigation (PRNAV) in a complex TMA 2. Validation of LPV approach as fallback for ILS 3. En Route Traffic Organizer for ATC controller 4. Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert for TMA specific operations 5. Altitude capture laws improving compatibility with ACAS & Automatic Responses to ACAS RA 6. DMAN Baseline to be used for Integration of AMAN- DMAN 7. Low cost Departure data entry panel FL110 FL100 TA New ALT Capture law no more nuisance RA 3400 feet/min 30 s = 1700 ft Adjust vertical speed RA 17

18 RELEASE 2 SESAR Solutions 1. Point Merge in CDG 2. Towards User Preferred Routing 3. Automated support for Dynamic Sectorization 4. Single Airport Remote Tower 5. Time Based Separations for traffic in approach phase 6. Point Merge in complex TMA 7. AOC Data Increasing Trajectory Prediction Accuracy 8. Multi-Sector Planning 18

19 Digitally Enhanced Briefing Services Validation (epib) WHAT Digitally enhanced pre-flight briefing services (epib) using Digital NOTAM data coming through SWIM services from Digital NOTAM encoding applications (prototypes) and digital MET data sources. Aim Improve the quality and the efficiency of information transferred by reducing the noise caused by flight irrelevant notifications Reduce the time needed for information transfer, by pinpoint filtering of information Reduce the risk of misinterpretation (by pilots) of information Make the experience of retrieving and browsing the epib information more enjoyable for users Dispatcher/ARO Integrated Briefing Portal Pilot On-board briefing device Flight planning functionality PIB functionality Validation method Real Time Simulation Flight Trajectory Management System (WP ) Digital Briefing Application (WP ) Validation : December 2014 Provide flight data trajectory/fpl Get data AI/MET/Flow/etc. SWIM Data Pool Get flight data trajectory/fpl Get data AI/MET/Flow/etc. ATM Operator Page 19

20 WHY : Demonstration Activities Apply SESAR Solution in other operational environment Generate further confidence to support buy-in from main stakeholders including regulators for future deployments Accompany SESAR pioneers all the way to pre-deployment WHAT 18 demonstration projects and 09 RPAS demonstrations Involving over 5000 commercial flights and 20 air operators Demonstrating significant performance gains can be achieved on flights within Europe and between Europe and North America, Latin America and Africa Final results of these projects will be gradually communicated in the course of 2014 and

21 RPAS Demonstration Projects 09 RPAS Demonstration Projects, which include integrated pre-operational flight trials activities, have been selected: Airports ANSP Industry RPAS Flight Operator 21

22 A large number of stakeholders in key location in Europe Coordinator Air Operator ANSP 22

23 RPAS.04 - Mediterranean ATM Live Exercise MAIN OBJECTIVE: Demonstrate the validity and limits of the ad-hoc operational procedures and airworthiness rules as well as of the existing technologies and systems focusing on a gap analysis between existing RPAS capabilities and the required for RPAS insertion into non-segregated airspace. PARTNERS: VALIDATION APPROACH: Real-time simulations and flight trials on Alenia Aermacchi Sky-Y aircraft. TYPE OF RPAS: MALE remotely piloted PROJECT ENDS: October 2015 LOCATION: Italy 23

24

25 Global Cooperation & Interoperability ICAO Standards built on SESAR and NextGen developments will support harmonised Implementation and Regulation EUROCAE RTCA etc. Programme level coordination enhanced by interoperability and wider industry buy-in. SESAR NextGen EC/FAA Coordination

26 MOVING FROM DEVELOPMENT TO DEPLOYMENT

27 BUSINESS VIEW PLANNING VIEW Ensuring the deployment of SESAR R&D results ATM Master Plan Outlines the essential operational and technological changes as well as standardisation and regulatory activities PCP Cover a first package of essential changes identified in the MP with the sufficient maturity and justification to be deployed at European level Updated in 2012 EC mandate received August 2012 Proposal submitted by the SJU to the EC in May Formal consultation launched 02/12 27

28 6 PACKAGES IDENTIFIED FOR NEAR TERM IMPLEMENTATION (Relates to ICAO Block 1) Key functional improvements addressing critical network performance deficiencies 1. Extended AMAN and PBN in high density TMAs 2. Airport Integration and Throughput Functionalities 3. Flexible Airspace Management and Free Route 4. Network Collaborative Management Building the infrastructure of the future 5. iswim: ground-ground integration and aeronautical data management & sharing 6. Initial Trajectory Information Sharing: air-ground integration towards i4d

29 How much? The Investor s View Overall PCP Benefits ANSP Productivity Gains (+3,4%) ; bn ; undiscounted (discounted) Fuel Cost Savings 8,0 (3,3) Fuel Burn (85,8 Kg/flight - 2,1%) Main influence factors for PCP benefits Airspace Capacity (+12,6% TMA, +8,7 En-Route) ANS Productivity gains CO 2 Credit Savings Delay Cost Savings 2,8 (1,1) 0,8 (0,3) 0,6 (0,2) Delay length (-12,2%) Airport Capacity (+3,9%) Total Benefit 12,1 (4,9) Delayed flights (-9,8%)

30 Aviation = Global Global framework ICAO based on input SESAR, NextGen (US), CARATS (Japan), others European input to ICAO based on SES/SESAR ATM Master Plan aligned with ASBU Global cooperation is essential EU US for SESAR-NextGen Europe other regions Europe ICAO

31 SESAR RESEARCH & INNVOVATION 2020

32 32 Programme 2020 Key Features

33 33 Maturity Life Cycle

34 High Performing Airport Operations Flight deck automation (optimise speed ajustement, engine-off taxi) Brake to vacate via datalink Full integration of AMAN-DMAN ASMGCS Total Airport management including passenger flow Remote tower for multiple airports 34

35 Optimised ATM Network Services User Driven Priority Process Rolling Network Operation Plan integrating Airport Operation Plan Dynamic Airspace configuration (e.g. sectoristaion) Dynamic Mobile Areas 35

36 Advanced Air Traffic Services Increased automation for conflict detection and resolution (4D Trajectory) Sectorless operations Multi sectors planning Full free routing accross borders (e.g. FAB) in high/very high traffic complexity Airborne Separation procedures and tooling (e.g. safety nets STCA, ACAS) 36

37 Enabling the Aviation Infrastructure CNS SWIM : Airborne to Ground Civil RPAS; GA & Rotorcraft integration 4D Trajectory Management 37

38 POTENTIAL AREAS OF INTEREST

39 Areas of Interest Civil RPAS integration in ATM Cyber Security 4D Trajectory Management Advanced Airspace Management Airport Management integrated in the Network Very Large Scale Demonstration 39

40 Civil RPAS Requirements & Challenges Requirements for RPAS integration are linked to the European ATM Master Plan and the ICAO Global Plan/ASBU timeline RPAS will have to fit into the ATM system (and not the reverse), with required adaptations to enable the safe integration of unmanned systems RPAS will have to prove to be as safe as current manned vehicle operations and, their behaviour in operations, to be equivalent to manned aviation, in particular for air traffic control 40

41 Civil RPAS Definition Phase(1/2) Refine the essential R&D activities for the integration in the EU Aviation System in the context of the SES initiative, as of 2016 and beyond Identify globally interoperable and harmonised ATM requirements and enablers to meet the performance requirements Produce a R&D and Validation programme - including planning, costs and priorities, as required by the different identified ATM requirements and enablers Establish a high level implementation timeline, including costs and priorities Provide material supporting the alignment of the legislative, financial and regulatory frameworks required for the deployment, including incentive mechanisms 41

42 Civil RPAS Definition Phase(2/2) The Civil RPAS Definition Phase has to result in the following tree of activities: Deliverable D.1: Regulatory and Business Framework Deliverable D.2: Performance Requirements and Assessment Deliverable D.3: Operational Changes in ATM Deliverable D.4: Enabling Systems Deliverable D.5: Validation Needs Deliverable D.6: SESAR Civil RPAS R&D Progr. requirements and outline Deliverable D.7: Input to the EU ATM Master Plan Evaluation in progress - Kick-off end of July - End in March

43 Why a Cyber-Security Study? The ATM System has to be trusted by the general public and by Governmental Authorities: sufficiently secure, resilient and trustworthy As ATM System relies on SWIM: effective protection is essential to guarantee the effectiveness, efficiency and economy Not only a technological change but also a cultural change due to its existing architecture, components and reliance on human operators A systemic approach to cyber-security for SWIM, considering in particular best practices implemented in other sectors An opportunity with regard to operational and cross-border interoperability (needs for international cooperation to ensure interoperability, standards definition...) Need to understand the economic implications of any proposed investments in this area, for an accepted level of risk 43

44 Introduce a holistic approach to cyber-security which complement the SESAR ATM security approach Provide a scalable approach and applicable across different stakeholders in different Member States at different levels of security maturity Support the SESAR next developments, in particular SWIM Be the grounds of a cyber-security strategy to participate to the effective deployment of the new ATM systems and to their interoperability Consider the interoperability dimension, the definition of standards agreed at international level Provide: 44 Objective and Scope of the Study Deliverable D.1: an ATM Cyber-Security Threat and Vulnerability Assessment Deliverable D.2: a SESAR Target ATM Cyber-Security Framework Deliverable D.3: a SESAR Cyber-Security Maturity Assessment Deliverable D.4: a SESAR Cyber-Security Strategy Study kick-off in May 2014 foreseen end March 2015

45 How can SESAR s 4D trajectory management help? Aircraft downlink their intended trajectory (EPP) Ground Trajectory Prediction becomes more accurate On request aircraft downlink min/max time over a point And can precisely (+/- 10 seconds) be at a point at the time we want them to (RTA) Ground-ground IOP ensures trajectory view is the same for all actors 45

46 SESAR: matching 2D air and ground trajectories Ground Trajectory Prediction (TP) Route discrepancy indicator (2D) EPP downlink (FMS trajectory) Top of Descent Source: D64 draft (MUAC RTS) - Estimates according to FMS horizontal speed schedule - Altitudes / flight levels according to FMS vertical speed schedule Lateral discrepancy to be resolved by controllers 46

47 Advanced flexible use of Airspace Squadron Squadron Squadron Squadron Airspace Booking System linking the squadrons to Network Manager via National Management Cell

48 Dynamic Mobile Area (DMA) Type 1 Defined by NM according to agreed plan, with times

49 DMA Type 2 Defined along aircraft trajectory only where needed

50 Airport Integration in ATM Problem Statement Network Operations Plan (NOP) Black Hole Network Operations Plan (NOP) ANSP ANSP Entry Fix TMA Runway Threshold Runway Entry Point Departure Fix En-route Approach Departure En-route 50

51 Airport Operations Plan (AOP) En-route-to-en-route-conversion of the Network Operations Plan (NOP), enriched by airportspecific data Single, common and collaboratively agreed rolling plan available to all airport stakeholders Purpose Provide common situational awareness Form the basis upon which stakeholder decisions relating to process optimisation can be made 51

52 Network & Airport Operations Plan Rolling Network Operations Plan integrating Airport Operations Plan

53 Airport Operations Centre (APOC) Platform/operational structure which pro-actively manages the performance of present and shortterm airport operations Gives a common operational overview of the airport to the airport stakeholders Supports information sharing, coordination and collaborative decision making Unique interface between the airport and the NM PMI CDG 53

54 PARTICIPATIONS OPTIONS IN SESAR 2020

55 55 Building SESAR 2020

56 56 Call for expression of interest

57 Principles and Definitions the closer to the market the supported activity is, the larger the additional funding from other sources should be innovation action' means an action primarily consisting of activities directly aimed at producing plans and arrangements or designs for new, altered or improved products, processes or services. For this purpose they may include prototyping, testing, demonstrating, piloting, large-scale product validation and market replication 57

58 Co-financing rates Exploratory Research for research actions: up to 100% of the eligible costs for innovation actions, if some beneficiaries or linked third parties are non-profit legal entities and some are profit legal entities: Up to 100% of the eligible costs of the beneficiaries and linked third parties that are non-profit legal entities, and Up to 70% of the eligible costs of the other beneficiaries 58

59 Co-financing rates Core Programme and VLSD innovation actions if some beneficiaries or linked third parties are non-profit legal entities and some are profit legal entities: 100% of the eligible costs of the beneficiaries and linked third parties that are non-profit legal entities, and 70% of the eligible costs of the other beneficiaries 59

60 Eligible Costs Direct Costs: actual costs or unit costs in certain cases Indirect Costs: flat rate of 25% on the direct costs (minus subcontracting, costs incurred by third parties not used in the beneficiaries premises and costs of providing financial support to third parties 60

61 Thank you for your attention 61