农产品伤害危机的品类网络溢出效应分析 基于三个实验结果的考察 李蒙蒙, 青平, 肖邦明

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "农产品伤害危机的品类网络溢出效应分析 基于三个实验结果的考察 李蒙蒙, 青平, 肖邦明"

Transcription

1 ( ) Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Sciences), Dec. 2017, 18(6): DOI: /j.cnki.jhau(ss) 农产品伤害危机的品类网络溢出效应分析 基于三个实验结果的考察 李蒙蒙, 青平, 肖邦明 ( ) 摘 要 416 SPSS22.0 T T 关键 词 中图分类号 F324.9 文献标志码 :A 文章编号 : (2017) The network spillover effect of the category of agricultural products injury crisis: Based on three experimental results LI Mengmeng, QING Ping, XIAO Bangming (School of Economic and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan , China) Abstract: From the localization perspective, we divide the agricultural product harm crisis into morality-breaking harm crisis and law-breaking harm crisis. Based on 416 consumers experimental data, the methods such as paired sample T test, independent sample T test and ANOVA equipped with SPSS22.0 are applied to investigate the difference of network spillover effect caused by different agricultural products harm crisis as well as the moderating role of social distance and pro-social tendency. The results reveal that morality-breaking crisis will lead to stronger category network spillover effect compared with law-breaking agricultural products harm crisis, and social distance as well as pro-social tendency will play a moderating role. Specifically, closer social distance or higher the pro-social tendency will contribute to greater difference between the category network spillover caused by the law-breaking and morality-breaking agricultural product harm crisis individually. Keywords: agricultural product harm crisis; network spillover effect; social distance; pro-social tendency; experiment 一 问题的提出 [1] 收稿日期 基金项目 ( ) 作者简介 (1993 ) [2] 2008

2 [3] - [4] [5] [6] [7]367 [8] [9] [10] - [11] [12] [13] [14-15] [16] [17-18] Borah [19] 二 理论分析与研究假设 1 [20-21] [22]97 [6]

3 28 ( ) [23]59 [24] [25] [23] [26] 3

4 VS. VS. VS. 图 1 农产品伤害危机的网络溢出效应模型框架 三 实验方法及实施过程 VS. 1 ( ) ( ) T T T T T p 0.05 T F p 0.05 T

5 30 ( ) (p 0.05) (p 0.05) ( p ) T [19] [22] ( VS. ) 2( VS. )

6 ( VS. ) 2( VS. ) % Carlo 四 实验结果分析 1. T (M=4.24,SD=0.62) (M=3.93 SD=1.08) (t(138)=2.09 P<0.05) (M=3.43 SD=0.93) (M=4.62 SD=0.65) (t(138)=-8.71 P<0.01) [19]368 ( ) T (M=-1.30,SD=0.99) (M=-0.15,SD=0.70 t(138)=-7.83 P<0.01) 1 2. T (M=4.16,SD=0.64) (M=3.76 SD=1.11) (t(134)=2.562 P<0.05) (M=3.63 SD=1.13) (M=4.44 SD=0.72) (t(134)=-4.97 P<0.01) (M=4.00 SD=0.67) (M=3.29 SD=1.01) (t(134)=4.81,p<0.01)

7 32 ( ) ( ) 2( VS ) 2( VS ) (F(1,132)=26.37 P<0.01) (M=-1.26,SD=0.99) (M=-0.14,SD=0.68;t(66)=-5.42,P<0.01) (M=-0.14,SD=0.57) (M=-0.45 SD=0.91 t(66)=1.65,p>0.05) 2 3. T (M=4.32,SD=0.55) (M=3.94 SD=1.08) (t(138)=2.64 P<0.01) (M=3.67 SD=1.21) (M=4.54 SD=0.89) (t(138)=-4.87 P<0.01) ( ) 2( VS ) 2( VS ) (F(1,136)=4.33 P<0.05) (M=-1.32 SD=0.81) (M=-0.70 SD=0.80 t(66)=-3.11 P<0.01) (M=-0.55 SD=0.46) (M=-0.42 SD=0.61 t(70)=-0.99 P>0.05) 3 五 结论及启示 参考文献 : [1] Siomkos G J Kurzbard G The hidden crisis in product-harm crisis management [J] European Journal of Marketing (2) [2] Ahluwalia R Burnkrant R E Unnava H R Consumer response to negative publicity the moderating role of commitment [J] Journal of Marketing Research (2) [3] Collins A M Loftus E F A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing[j] Readings in Cognitive Science (6) [4] Feldman Jack M, Lynch John G Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief Attitude

8 Intention and Behavior [J] Journal of Applied Psychology (8) [5] Siomkos G Triantafillidou A Vassilikopoulou A et al. Opportunities and threats for competitors in product harm crises[j] Marketing Intelligence & Planning (6) [6] Dahlen M Lange F A Disaster is contagious how a brand in crisis affects other brands [J] Journal of Advertising Research (1) [7] Roehm M L Tybout A M When will a brand scandal spill over and how should competitors respond [J]. Journal of Marketing Research (7) [8] Votala N L Unnava H R Spillover of negative information on brand alliances [J] Journal of Consumer Psychology (2) [9] Kruglanski A W Webster D M Motivated closing of the mind seizing and freezing [J] Psychological Review (2) [10] Flynn L R Goldsmith R E Application of the personal involvement inventory in marketing [J] Psychology & Marketing (4) [11] Monga A B John D R Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation the influence of analytic versus holistic thinking [J] Journal of Consumer Research (4) [12] Lei J Dawar N Lemmink J Negative spillover in brand portfolios exploring the antecedents of asymmetric effects [J] Journal of Marketing (3) [13] Zhao Y Consumer learning in a turbulent market environment Modeling consumer choice dynamics in the wake of a product-harm crisis [J] Journal of Marketing Research (2) [14] Honda K Koguchi M Koga K et al The impact of product-harm crisis on marketing effectiveness [J]. Marketing Science (2) [15] Kathleen Cleeren, Harald J van Heerde, Marnik G Dekimpe Rising from the ashes how brands and categories can overcome product-harm crisis [J] Journal of Marketing (2) [16] Aikaterini Vassilikopoulou George Siomkos Kalliopi Chatzipanagiotou et al Product-harm crisis management time heals all wounds [J] Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2009(16) [17] Balachander S Ghose S Reciprocal spillover effects A strategic benefit of brand extensions [J]. Journal of Marketing (1) 4-13 [18] [J] (2) [19] Borah A Tellis G J Halo (Spillover) Effects in social media do product recalls of one brand hurt or help rival brands [J] Journal of Marketing Research 2016,53 (2): [20] [M] 1992 [21] [M] 2007 [22] [J] 2010(5) [23] [J] 2005(Z1) [24] Small D A Simonsohn U Friends of victims personal experience and prosocial behavior [J] Journal of Consumer Research (3) [25] Wakslak C J Trope Y Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely probability and the mental representation of events [J] Journal of Experimental Psychology General (4) [26] Carlo G Hausmann A Christiansen S et al Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents [J] The Journal of Early Adolescence (1) 责任编辑 : 李东辉