International Water Purification Programme

Transcription

1 GOLD STANDARD FINAL VERIFICATION /CERTIFICATION REPORT International Water Purification Programme Report No.: EC09(B) Report Date: 13/03/2018 China Classification Society Certification Company 40, Dong Huang Cheng Gen South Street, Beijing, , P.R.China (Rev ) 1 / 18

2 Project Name: International Water Purification Programme Host Country: Uganda Client: Pure Water Ltd. Date of first issue of this report: 02/02/2018 Date of this revision: 13/03/2018 Gold Standard Reference Number: Chlorine Dispensers in Uganda - CPA 2: GS 2735 Work carried out by: Technical Review by: Revision No.:2.0 UNFCCC Reference Number: Chlorine Dispensers in Uganda - CPA2: Team Leader: LI Xingtong Team Member: XU Fangzhou TANG Xuemei; XIE Fengjun Decision Making by: TANG Xuemei; XIE Fengjun Approved by: Huang Shiyuan Summary of the Verification Opinion: China Classification Society Certification (hereafter CCSC) has conducted the GS-CDM 3 rd periodic verification of International Water Purification Programme with CDM PoA Registration Reference Number 5962 and GS ID GS2404. The projects were implemented by Evidence Action and applied the methodology AMS-III.AV Version 03, on the basis of Gold Standard requirements, UNFCCC criteria, as well as criteria given to provide for consistent PoA operations, monitoring and reporting. For the 3 rd monitoring period (01/10/ /05/2016, both days included), the PP only seek Gold Standard certification for Chlorine Dispensers in Uganda CPA 2 (GS 2735). CPA-2 has installed 1,150 chlorine dispensers by the end date of this monitoring period in Eastern Uganda (Kibuku, Budaka and Manafwa districts). The verification scope is defined as a periodic independent review and ex-post determination by the DOE of the monitored reductions in GHG emissions and PoA s sustainability during defined verification period, and consisted of the following three phases: i) Desk review of the PoA design and the baseline and monitoring plan; ii) On-site visit and follow-up interviews with PoA stakeholders; iii) Resolution of outstanding issues and the issuance of the final verification report and opinion. The overall verification, from Contract Review to Verification Report & Opinion, was conducted using CCSC internal procedures. In summary, CCSC confirms that the CPA-2 is implemented as planned and described in validated and revised PoA-DD and CPA-DD and Gold Standard Passport. The monitoring system is in place, the monitoring requirements as per Gold Standard have been complied with, the GHG emission reduction is calculated without material misstatements, and the CPA-2 GS-CER issued totalizes 4,256 t CO 2e covering the monitoring period from 01/10/2015 to 31/05/2016. Our opinion relates to the GHG emission reductions and sustainability of CPA-2 are based on the valid and revised PoA-DD and CPA-DD baseline, monitoring plan and its associated documents. No distribution without permission from the Client or responsible organizational unit Limited distribution Unrestricted distribution (Rev ) 2 / 18

3 CAR CCSC CDM CER CL CO 2 CO 2 e CPA-DD DOE ERs FAR GHG GS MP MR PoA-DD PP UNFCCC VVS ABBREVIATIONS Corrective Action Request China Classification Society Certification Company Clean Development Mechanism Certified Emission Reduction Clarification Request Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide equivalent Component Project Activities design document Designated Operational Entity Emission Reductions Forward Action Request Greenhouse Gas(es) Gold Standard Monitoring Plan Monitoring Report PoA Design Document Project Participant United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Validation and Verification Standard (Rev ) 3 / 18

4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVE SCOPE GHG PROJECT DESCRIPTION METHODOLOGY APPOINTMENT OF VERIFICATION TEAM REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS FOLLOW-UP INTERVIEWS RESOLUTION OF CLARIFICATION, CORRECTIVE AND FORWARD ACTION REQUESTS INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL VERIFICATION FINDINGS REMAINING ISSUES CARS, CLS AND FARS FROM PREVIOUS VALIDATION/VERIFICATION PERIOD PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION GHG EMISSION MONITORING CHECK SUSTAINABILITY MONITORING CHECK WATER QUALITY & QUANTITY LIVELIHOOD OF THE POOR HUMAN AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY CLARIFICATION REQUESTS, CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS AND FORWARD ACTION REQUESTS VERIFICATION CONCLUSION REFERENCE Appendix A: Certificates of Competence (Rev ) 4 / 18

5 1. INTRODUCTION The Coordinating/managing Entity (CME), Pure Water Ltd. has commissioned China Classification Society Certification (hereafter called CCSC ) to verify the emissions reductions of its GS-CDM PoA International Water Purification Programme (hereafter called the PoA ) owned by Evidence Action, which only seek Gold Standard certification for Chlorine Dispensers in Uganda CPA2 (GS 2735). CPA-2 has installed 1,150 chlorine dispensers at the end date of this monitoring period in Eastern Uganda (Kibuku, Budaka and Manafwa districts). This report summarizes the findings of the verification of the PoA, performed on the basis of Gold Standard requirements version 2.2, UNFCCC criteria, as well as criteria given to provide for consistent PoA operations, monitoring and reporting OBJECTIVE Verification is the periodic independent review and ex-post determination by the DOE of the monitored reductions in GHG emissions and the sustainability development indicators of CPA-2 during defined verification period. The objective of Gold Standard verification is to verify the reported emission reductions and to confirm that actual monitoring systems and procedures are in compliance with that described in the monitoring plan and the additional requirements stated by the GS SCOPE The verification scope is defined as an independent and objective review of the GS Passport, the PoA s baseline study and GS monitoring plan and other relevant documents. The information in these documents is reviewed against Gold Standard requirements version 2.2, Kyoto Protocol requirements, UNFCCC rules and associated interpretations. The verification is not meant to provide any consulting service towards the Project Participants (hereafter called PPs ). However, stated requests for clarifications and/or corrective actions may provide input for improvement of the PoA monitoring towards reductions in the GHG emissions and the PoA s sustainability GHG PROJECT DESCRIPTION The PoA seeks to further the access of households and communities to clean and safe drinking water, by promoting low greenhouse gas emitting water purification technologies in the host Parties. The PoA is thus primarily designed for the long-term improvement of the living conditions of local people. The targeted users of such technologies will be households and/or communities. Examples of technologies include, but are not limited to, water filters (e.g. membrane, activated carbon, ceramic filters), solar technologies (Ultra violet disinfection devices, solar water disinfection SODIS), photocatalytic disinfection equipment, pasteurization appliances, chemical disinfection methods (e.g. chlorination), combined treatment approaches (e.g. Flocculation plus disinfection), etc. The PoA reduces the use and demand for fossil fuels and non-renewable biomass that would have been (Rev ) 5 / 18

6 used to boil water as a mean of water purification in the absence of the Programme of Activities. This directly leads to reduced greenhouse gas emissions. The PoA is implemented by Pure Water Ltd. who is the coordinating/managing entity (hereafter referred to as CME ). The CME is responsible for the collection of data in accordance with the monitoring plan and the reporting of GHG emissions reductions from the CPAs. PoA title: UNFCCC PoA Reference No.: International Water Purification Programme 5962 Registration Date: 16/11/2012 PoA Renewal Period: 16/11/ /11/2019 PoA Duration 19/11/ /11/2040 Monitoring Period: 3 rd monitoring period: 01/10/ /05/2016 Specific-case CPA reference number (Gravity Driven Membrane Filters in Uganda - CPA 1) (Chlorine Dispensers in Uganda CPA 2) (Chlorine Dispensers in Uganda CPA 3) Coordinating/managing entity (CME): Methodologies used UNFCCC view page: Pure Water Ltd. AMS-III.AV. Low greenhouse gas emitting safe drinking water production systems (EB69, version 03) X48DCT65YUZV03A7KELJ2SMFW/view For this monitoring period (01/10/ /05/2016, both days included), the PP only seek Gold Standard certification for Chlorine Dispensers in Uganda CPA2 (GS 2735). CPA-2 has installed 1,150 chlorine dispensers by the end date of this monitoring period in Eastern Uganda (Kibuku, Budaka and Manafwa districts). Items Techniology Location Dispensers installation Start/compl ete date Dispenser s Installed Functional Dispenser s GS Register ed Date Operation days in this monitoring period CPA- 2 Chlorine dispenser system Uganda: Kibuku district Budaka district Manafwa district 08/04/ /04/2014 1,150 1,097 03/06/ days During this monitoring period (01/10/ /05/2016), the CPA-2 has been operated normally and there have been no events or situations that occurred which may impact the applicability of the applied methodology. The monitoring system was installed, maintained in a proper manner, while collected monitoring data allowed for the verification of the amount of achieved GHG emission reductions. (Rev ) 6 / 18

7 2. METHODOLOGY CCSC has assessed and determined that the implementation and operation of the PoA activity, and the steps taken to report emission reductions comply with the GS criteria, rules and relevant guidance provided by the GS Foundation and CDM-EB. The assessment involved an appointment of verification, document review of relevant documentation as well as the on-site visits APPOINTMENT OF VERIFICATION TEAM The verification was conducted by a verification team which was designated by CCSC in accordance with its internal procedures. The competence and impartiality of the verification team are the key elements that have been taken into account by CCSC when appointing the verification team. The details of the validation team are as follows: Name Qualification Role Mr.LI Xingtong Verifier Team Leader Sectoral Scope /Technical Area TA1.1/1.2/3.1/9. 2/13.1 On-site visit Yes Mr.XU Fangzhou Verifier Team Member TA1.2 Yes Ms. TANG Xuemei Verifier Technical reviewer TA1.1/1.2/3.1/4. 1 No Mrs. XIE Fengjun Verifier Technical reviewer TA1.2/13.1/13.2 No Collectively, the above verification team is competent for conducting the verification and the impartiality is well guaranteed. Meanwhile, the Certificates of Competence for auditors of the verification team are enclosed in Appendix A to this report REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS The Gold Standard Monitoring Report (GS-MR) submitted by Pure Water Ltd. and additional background documents related to the CAP-2 design and baseline, i.e. country Law, the accepted revised CPA-DD/1/ and GS Passport/2/, approved methodology AMS-III.AV. Version 03/13/ and Kyoto Protocol were reviewed. The following documents were used as references to the verification work, in addition to internal CCSC procedures: Gold Standard requirements & Toolkit 2.2/15/; Validation and Verification Standard Version 9.0/14/; ISO Greenhouse gases Part 3: Specification with guidance for the validation and verification of greenhouse gas assertions; ISO Greenhouse gases Part 2: Specification with guidance at the PoA level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reduction or removal enhancements. The verification conclusions presented in this report related to the CPA-2 as described in the Approved revised CPA-DD Version 05 dated 04/11/2016/1/, GS Passport version 03 dated 01/04/2015 of CPA-2/2/, and GS-MR version 02 dated 13/03/2018 of 3 rd monitoring (Rev ) 7 / 18

8 period from 01/10/2015 to 31/05/2016 /20/. Documents reviewed and information sources used during desk review are listed in section 5 to this report FOLLOW-UP INTERVIEWS Between 17/10/2016 and 19/10/2016, CCSC performed an on-site visit and interviews with PoA stakeholders to confirm selected information and to resolve issues identified in the document review. Representatives of Mbale Office of Evidence Action, Uganda, Pure Water Ltd. and Local residents were interviewed (see References). The main topics of the interviews are summarized in the Table below. Interviewed organization Mbale Office of Evidence Action, Uganda Pure Water Ltd. Local villagers Interview topics -PoA Design and implementation -Technical equipment, calibration and operation -Monitoring Plan and management procedures -Monitoring data -Data uncertainty and residual risks (QA/QC) -GHG Calculation -Mitigation measures -Compliance with National Laws and Regulations -Monitoring Plan -Monitored data and Monitoring Report -Key SD indicators -GHG Calculations -Changes to the key SD indicators -Achievement and implementation of mitigation measures, 2.4. RESOLUTION OF CLARIFICATION, CORRECTIVE AND FORWARD ACTION REQUESTS The objective of this phase of the verification is to raise the requests for corrective actions and clarification and any other outstanding issues that needed to be clarified for CCSC positive conclusion on the GHG emission reduction calculation and the sustainability development indicators of CPA-2. Findings established during the verification can either be seen as a non-fulfilment of criteria ensuring the proper implementation of a PoA or where a risk to deliver high quality emission reductions is identified. A Corrective Action Request (CAR) will be raised if one of the following occurs: (a) Non-compliance with the monitoring plan, the methodology or the standardized baseline are found in monitoring and reporting and has not been sufficiently documented by the CME, or if the evidence provided to prove conformity is insufficient; (b) Modifications to the implementation, operation and monitoring of the registered PoA activity has not been sufficiently documented by the CME; (Rev ) 8 / 18

9 (c) Mistakes have been made in applying assumptions, data or calculations of emission reductions that will impact the quantity of emission reductions; (d) Issues identified in a FAR during validation to be verified during verification or previous verification(s) have not been resolved by the CME. A Clarification Request (CL) will be raised if information is insufficient or not clear enough to determine whether the applicable GS/UNFCCC requirements have been met. A Forward Action Request (FAR) will be raised, for actions if the monitoring and reporting require attention and/or adjustment for the next verification period. A FAR shall not relate to the GS/UNFCCC requirements for issuance. After completion of the above two sections (section 2.2 and 2.3), during this monitoring period, no CAR and no CL and no FAR was raised. The final verification conclusion presented in this report is based on the GS MR (Version 2.0, dated on 13/03/2018)/20/ and additional information or evidence provided by the PPs. The verification team completed the verification report and submitted it for technical review, decision making and final approval INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CCSC has taken the following quality control measures within the verification team and of the verification process according to relevant CCSC s internal procedures: The contract review of the verification was conducted and concluded that CCSC has the accredited scope and competence to validate the PoA with impartiality as well; The verification team was selected with due considerations given in terms of the competence and impartiality; The verification team carried out the verification work and compiled a verification report strictly following CCSC s Procedures for Implementation of Verification. The verification report submitted by the verification team was subjected to a technical review and decision-making process, the technical reviewers and decision-makers are qualified and independent from the verification team. If any issue is raised during technical review and/or decision-making the same is to be discussed between the issue-raiser and the team leader as well as the CME and/or PP. All issues must be satisfactorily addressed before the submission of the report for final approval. The persons who conducted the technical review and decision-making for the PoA are shown on the section 2.1 of this report and their Certificates of Competence can be found in Appendix A of this report. The report approved by the authorized official of CCSC as the final report together with relevant documents are submitted to GS for registration (only if an unconditioned positive validation opinion is concluded). (Rev ) 9 / 18

10 3. VERIFICATION FINDINGS The findings of the verification from the desk review of the original monitoring documents and the findings from interviews during the follow up site visit are stated in the following sections REMAINING ISSUES CARS, CLS AND FARS FROM PREVIOUS VALIDATION/VERIFICATION PERIOD All CARs and CLs raised were successfully closed during the validation and the previous periodic verification stage of the PoA, and no remaining issues of GS were left PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION CCSC has performed an on-site visit and found that the CPA-2 have been implemented and operated in accordance with operational criteria set out in the PoA-DD and CPA-DD during the monitoring period. During the document review and furthermore during the on-site visit, the verification team has reviewed the registered monitoring plan and compared it with the monitoring methodology to verify their compliance. Therefore, the verification team confirms that the monitoring plan of the accepted revised PoA-DD Version 07 and CPA-DD version 05/1/ is in compliance with the monitoring methodology and tools applied to this PoA/13/. By the end of this monitoring period, CPA-2 had installed 1,150 chlorine dispensers in Eastern Uganda (Kibuku, Budaka and Manafwa districts), which is less than 1,302 assumed in the accepted revised CPA-DD/1/. The PP has operated the CPA-2 as per the registered GS Passport/2/. Gold Standard relevant Sustainable Development Indicators have been monitored as required by the monitoring plan. CCSC has verified training records/8/ provided by the PP and found substantial. The CPA-2 has been implemented and operated as described in the GS Passport/2/. There are no changes in the key equipment and no impacts on the claimed emission reductions or GS qualification need to be considered GHG EMISSION MONITORING CHECK The emission reductions claimed for this monitoring period was verified already in the course of the 3 rd periodic CDM verification. Please refer to the CDM verification report of the CDM Registration Reference Number 5962 for the 3 rd monitoring period as follow: The emission reductions during the 3 rd monitoring period are presented in the following table: (Rev ) 10 / 18

11 Project Chlorine Dispensers in Uganda CPA 2 Period Baseline emissions (tco 2e) Project emissions (tco 2e) Leakage (tco 2e) Emission reductions (tco 2e) 01/10/ /05/2016 4, ,256 Comment/request 1: After CER issuance, the CME/PP shall provide the amount and serial number of CERs in vintage break for GS labeling. Response by Project Proponent: The serial numbers of issued CERs have been added to the monitoring report as follow: Vintage GS CERs Serial Number Block Start Serial Number Block End 01/10/ /12/2015 1,605 01/01/ /05/2016 2,651 UG UG UG UG Assessments by DOE: The serial numbers of issued CERs have been added in the section 2 of the monitoring report (Version 02)/20/, which is consistent with UNFCCC website. CCSC confirmed that the emission reduction has been determined in a conservative manner and is in compliance with the applied version of the methodology AMS-III.AV. version 03/13/. There is no deviation of the requested GS emission reductions with the UNFCCC issued CERs for the monitoring periods in consideration (i.e. 01/10/ /05/2016) SUSTAINABILITY MONITORING CHECK WATER QUALITY & QUANTITY This indicator is monitored by checking fraction of samples that meet a quality threshold of < 10 CFU/100 ml for E. Coli. IDEXX machine is used for testing E.coli and Hach Color Wheel is used to determine Total Chlorine Residual (TCR). As part of the third monitoring period water quality samples were collected and the results were consolidated into one single value over the full monitoring period, with a total of 19 dispensers targeted and 357 households sampled. Through on-site inspection, the verification team confirms the existence of IDEXX machine and chemical tests with a Hach Color Wheel. In addition, Water Quality Testing Form/10/ has been randomly checked as well, it found that among the households tested for Total Chlorine Residual (TCR), 165 households were positive, and 156 samples were found contained E.coli less than 10 CFU/100ml. Therefore, the value of 95.0% was calculated/17/ and considered as fraction of households with sufficient water quality. With interviewed the Analyst in the Lab, the verification team found the Protocol for Processing (Rev ) 11 / 18

12 Samples (Protocol for Processing Samples using IDEXX Quanti Tray / 2000) /9/ was strictly carried out. And the Protocol of the PoA is in line with the Quanti-Tray System User Manual/11/ issued by the IDEXX. CCSC is of the opinion that the target was met in the 3 rd monitoring period as more than 90% of the households using chlorine dispensers have less than 10 CFU/100 ml E. coli in their drinking water. However, because of that Evidence Action didn t require specifically for the drinking water as the water samples, only 165 households among 357 sampled households provided valid drinking water samples, to be conservative, CME and EA would like to assume except 156 households, all other visited households were not safe and 43.6% (156/357) will be considered as the final water quality test (WQT) value LIVELIHOOD OF THE POOR This indicator is monitored by checking the number of people treating their drinking water with chlorine. The PP has monthly monitored that the number of people treating their drinking water with chlorine by testing positive for residual chlorine (TCR) in their drinking water during an unannounced household visit. CCSC verification team has checked the adoption rate document supplied by the CME/19/, which is in accordance with the adoption survey records/18/, on average in 64.4% of the households could be found chlorine residual in the stored drinking water at home. As per the accepted revised CPA-DD, 301 persons supplied with purified water from each chlorine dispensers of CPA-2, and in total 346,150 persons (1,150 dispensers * 301 person/dispenser) have access to the chlorine dispensers allocated to CPA 2, and approximately 222,920 persons are drinking water treated with chlorine, which was more than 150,000 persons of the target in the GS passport. Therefore, it is confirmed that this indicator was met the target in the 3 rd monitoring period HUMAN AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY This indicator is monitored by checking number of end users attending community education meetings because many people in rural Uganda know nothing about the importance of clean and safe drinking water. In addition, according to GS passport, this indicator will be monitored once for every location within 60 days of installation of dispenser. CCSC has checked relevant record - Community Education Meeting attendance roster/12/ on site and confirmed that all these meeting are organized for every installed chlorine dispenser, the dates of meetings covered from 17 th April 2013 to 16 th April 2014, each meeting was held within 60 days every dispenser installation. CCSC is of the opinion that the target was met in the 3 rd monitoring period as a total of 50,263 persons attended the CEMs - an average of almost 45 attendants per meeting for CPA-2, which means more than 30,000 community members learnt about the dangers of contaminated drinking water and how to use the dispenser properly QUANTITATIVE EMPLOYMENT AND INCOME GENERATION (Rev ) 12 / 18

13 This indicator is monitored by checking number of Evidence Action employees and contractors in Uganda because unemployment in Uganda is high and additional employment opportunities are needed. CCSC has checked relevant staff list and part of contracts/5/ on site and confirmed that 52 full/part-time jobs were offered by Evidence Action in Uganda in 2015 with different titles and departments. Also, with salary comparison between Evidence Action Payslips/6/ and Salary Structure for Financial Year 2015/2016/7/, salaries of 52 jobs at par or better than the average local/sector wage level. Therefore, CCSC verification team has confirmed that the project can increase employment opportunities. Since the further target of this indicator is for 2018, depending on the availability of additional funds to pursue the initially anticipated expansion plan, it is still possible to meet 150 full/part-time jobs by (Rev ) 13 / 18

14 4. CLARIFICATION REQUESTS, CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS AND FORWARD ACTION REQUESTS During the 3 rd monitoring period, no clarification requests (CL) and no corrective action requests (CAR) and no forward action requests (FAR) is raised. (Rev ) 14 / 18

15 5. VERIFICATION CONCLUSION CCSC has performed the GS-CDM 3 rd periodic verification of International Water Purification Programme, CDM Registration PoA Reference Number 5962, GS ID GS2404 implemented by Evidence Action in Uganda. The project was applied the approved consolidated methodology AMS-III.AV Version 03, on the basis of Gold Standard version 2.2 requirements, UNFCCC criteria, host country criteria, as well as criteria given to provide for consistent PoA operations, monitoring and reporting. The management of Pure Water Ltd. is responsible for the preparation of the GHG emissions data, sustainable development indicators and the reported GHG emissions reductions of the PoA on the basis set out within the PoA Monitoring Plan in the registered GS Passport. The development and maintenance of records and reporting procedures in accordance with that plan, including the calculation and determination of GHG emission reductions from the PoA, is the responsibility of the management of the PoA. CCSC has verified the PoA s Gold Standard Monitoring Report (version 02)/20/ for the reporting period as indicated below. CCSC confirms that the PoA is implemented and described in validated and registered Gold Standard Passport. Installed equipment being essential for generating emission reduction runs reliably. The monitoring system is in place, the monitoring requirements as per Gold Standard have been complied with, and the PoA is generating GHG emission reductions as a GS-CDM PoA. CCSC can confirm that the GHG emission reduction is calculated without material misstatements. Our opinion relates to the GHG emission reductions and sustainability of CPA-2 are based on the accepted revised CPA-DD, GS passport and its associated documents. Based on the evidence and information that are considered necessary to guarantee that GHG emission reductions are appropriately calculated, CCSC confirms the following statement: Monitoring period Baseline emissions Project emissions Leakage emissions Emission Reductions Unit tco 2e tco 2e tco 2e tco 2e 01/10/2015 to 31/05/2016 4, ,256 The table below shows the amount and serial numbers of the issued CERs: Vintage GS CERs Serial Number Block Start Serial Number Block End 01/10/ /12/2015 1,605 01/01/ /05/2016 2,651 UG UG UG UG (Rev ) 15 / 18

16 Authorized Signature: Name: Huang Shiyuan Date: 10/02/2018 (Rev ) 16 / 18

17 6. REFERENCE Documents provided by the CME and relevant background documents have been reviewed or referenced for the periodic verification conclusions 1 PoA-DD version 06 dated 02/10/2012, Reference Number 5962 Accepted revised PoA-DD Version 07 dated 13/04/2015, Reference Number 5962 CPA-DD version 05 dated 04/11/ GS Passport version 03 dated 01/04/2015 for CPA2, ID GS GS Monitoring Report version 01 dated 10/01/ Evidence Action, Community Adoption Survey 5 Evidence Action, Staff List 2015 & Staff Contracts 6 Evidence Action, Payslips 7 Evidence Action, Salary Structure for Financial Year 2015/ Evidence Action, REFRESHER TRAINING AGENDA 12 th -15 th April Evidence Action, Protocol for Processing Samples using IDEXX Quanti Tray / Evidence Action, Water Quality Testing Form 11 Evidence Action, Quanti-Tray System User Manual ( 12 Evidence Action, CEM record - Community Education Meeting Attendance Roster 13 AMS-III.AV. version Validation and Verification Standard version Gold Standard requirements & Toolkit The 3 rd CDM verification report 17 The ER spreadsheet of the 3 rd monitoring period 18 Adoption survey records 19 Adoption rate spreadsheet 20 GS Monitoring Report version 02 dated 13/03/2018 (Rev ) 17 / 18

18 APPENDIX A: CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCE (Rev ) 18 / 18