Initial Shelf Space Considerations at New Grocery Stores: An Allocation Problem with Product Switching and Substitution
|
|
- Bertha Sanders
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal 1, , 2005 c 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. Manufactured in The United States. Initial Shelf Space Considerations at New Grocery Stores: An Allocation Problem with Product Switching and Substitution PEDRO M. REYES pedro reyes@baylor.edu Baylor University, Hankamer School of Business, P.O. Box 98006, Waco, Texas 76798, USA GREGORY V. FRAZIER frazier@uta.edu Information Systems and Operations Management Department, College of Business Administration, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas , USA Abstract. Managing limited display areas is an increasingly challenging task in the grocery retail industry, especially given the current high levels of product proliferation. The decision of how to best allocate and manage shelf space is critical to grocery retail profitability. Moreover, this decision is escalated for initial shelf space considerations at new grocery stores. Without loss to generality, this paper presents a new approach to the shelf space allocation problem that could be applied to new grocery stores for determining their initial shelf space consideration by incorporating consumer behavior actions based on the consumer s decision process. Keywords: shelf space allocation, grocery retailing, product proliferation, modelling With the growing self-service retailing industry and the proliferation of new products, the management of scarce display areas continues to be an increasingly sensitive subject. The decision of shelf space allocation and management is critical to effective grocery retail operations management and is escalated issue for those new (and often independent) grocery stores. A well-managed shelf space not only improves customer service by reducing out-of-stock occurrences; it can also improve the return on inventory investment by increasing sales and profit margins (Yang, 2001; Yang and Chen, 1999). Ideally, the decision rules regarding shelf space allocation should consider the profit contribution of each product in the category against the opportunity costs for carrying the inventory (Cox, 1964, 1970). The theory within the context of self-service grocery retail stores is that the demand for a product is influenced by the quantity of display exposure, and it has been speculated that this structure of promotion is capable of shifting brand choices among consumers (Anderson, 1979; Urban, 2002). In general, one of the primary concerns of grocery retail management involves determining the variety of brands to be stocked, and the allocation of scare shelf space Corresponding author. Pedro M. Reyes, Baylor University, Hankamer School of Business, P.O. Box 98006, Waco, Texas 76798, USA, Tel.: (254)
2 184 REYES AND FRAZIER among these stocked brands so as to maximize the retail store s profits. A subset of items from the entire category must be selected in order to maximize profits for the category, which is different from maximizing each product independently (Bawa, Landweher and Krishna, 1989; Judd and Vaught, 1988; McIntyre and Miller, 1999; Nielson, 1995). Once the category assortment has been determined, the next step is the shelf space allocation. There are many approaches to the shelf space allocation problem. Among them are optimization models whose optimal decisions are obtained using some operational constraints with respect to the practical retail environment. The primary argument in the literature posits that the allocation decision is critical to the operational decision because it directly relates to profitability as it affects cost and revenues. The space allocation influences the buyers perceptibility and therefore demand, along with various costs that include ordering, holding, handling, and transportation. Anderson and Amato (1974) addressed the fundamental short run resource allocation problem by proposing a mathematical model for simultaneously determining the most profitable short run brand mix concurrent with a determination of the optimal shelf space allocation of a fixed display area among the available brand mix. The primary assumption was that the optimal displayed area allocation depends on the composition of brand preference for potential demand where the potential demand refers to the limit of the inventory of the product displayed that would be sold if all available product brands were displayed. The expected demand function consists of three disjoint components: switching preference demand, non-switching preference demand, and random demand. The random demand represents the attractiveness of the displayed inventory to stimulate demand for those buyers that do not have a brand preference. However, this model did not include the cost effects of inventory. The mathematical programming model of Hansen and Heinsbroek (1979) proposed a model for maximizing profits by expressing the contributions to profits of all products less the costs associated with replenishing the shelf stock. Incorporating the main demand effect with the cost effect made the model more complete. One major assumption is that while the space elasticity for each unit sales is assumed to be constant, the substitution and complementary effects between products are not explicitly considered. Corstjens and Doyle (1981) developed a more comprehensive model for optimizing retail space. Their general model proposed to maximize profits by incorporating the real dimensions of the retailer s optimization problem it is a model that incorporates both the main demand effects with the cost effects of alternative space allocations. The significance of this model is the true nature of the relationship between space and store profitability. Whereas additional space given to a product increases its sales potential, it also affects the sales of other products in the assortment. Hence, ignoring these cross-elasticities and considering only the main demand effects can lead to a sub-optimization in the shelf space allocation procedure. The demand structure defined as a multiplicative power function of the displayed areas allocated to all of the products, which represents the direct elasticity with respect to a unit of shelf space, a scaling constant, the cross space elasticity between products, and the number of products, which is necessary to include the individual space elasticities and the cross space elasticities that exist between products within the store. This provided an advantage
3 INITIAL SHELF SPACE CONSIDERATIONS AT NEW GROCERY STORES 185 over previous models because the explicit consideration of cross elasticities between the products accounts for substitutability and complementarity of product offerings. The individual space elasticity is defined as the main effects (demand) of the product, where the potential for positive elasticity of unit sales exists with respect to increased shelf space. The cross-space elasticity is defined by the degree of substitution, where the more similar the products, the more likely the customer would consider them to be substitutes. Corstjens and Doyle (1983) later extended their static optimization model to a dynamic model incorporating essential determinants of retail performance under dynamic trading conditions focusing on strategic allocation of retail space by incorporating the supply side inflexibilities and the demand side goodwill effects. The goodwill effects is formulated into the demand structure by using the sales of a product in particular period and a retention rate that measuring how much of the goodwill effect in one period is retained in the next. The shortcoming of this model is that their constraints were simplified and the cost functions from prior work were relaxed in this model formulation. Zufryden (1986, 1987) proposed a dynamic programming model approach as a dynamic extension of Corstjens and Doyle (1981). The primary focus was to choose a product selection from the entire set of products in the category assortment, and optimally allocate them to scarce supermarket retail shelf space, while considering realistic constraints (i.e. supply availability and operational restrictions). The design of this approach considered a general maximization objective function based on revenues (demand) that accounted for space elasticity and potential demand related marketing variables, and costs of sales. The demand function for each product is defined by the elasticities that are associated with each demand explanatory (marketing) variable. The advantages that are claimed by this approach over those previous proposed methods are that non-space variables have not been included in previous model formulations. The optimization model presented by Bultez and Naert (1988) introduced demand interdependencies prevailing across and within product groups detailing a theoretical shelf space allocation model called Shelf Allocation for Retailers Profits (SH.A.R.P.) as an extension to Corstjens and Doyle (1981). Essentially, this is a cannibalism affect within each homogeneous product category, which is modeled by an attraction of the items shared in the assortment of products. This model was then extended by Bultez, Naert, Gijsbrechts and vanden Abeele (1989), now referred as SH.A.R.P. II, and was empirically tested on a sample data concluding that variants of cannibalism produce asymmetric demand substitution patterns within the retail category assortment. Borin, Farris and Freeland (1994) developed a category management model for determining retail category product assortment and shelf space allocation based on in-store support as a function of space. A key characteristic of this model is the division of the product s market share into two components uncompromised demand and compromised demand. The uncompromised demands are characterized by the customers preference for a particular product, the in-store merchandizing support, and the product availability. The compromised demand comes from customers that are willing to compromise their choice when specific brands they wanted are not available.
4 186 REYES AND FRAZIER Conceptually, their model formulation of the demand for a product within a store is comprised of four factors: unmodified demand, modified demand, acquired demand, and stock out demand. The unmodified demand represents the customers intrinsic preference effect for the product, which represents the brand s market strength exclusive of the in-store merchandising support. The modified demand represents the in-store merchandising support effect. This factor is the interaction effect of the unmodified demand and the in-store attractiveness based on the in-store merchandising support where this demand could be either positive or negative. This is the same as Corstjens-Doyle s cross-space elasticities. The acquired demand then captures the assortment effect, and is made up of two parts in the multiplicative relationship: the relative sales strength and a resistance to compromise (also known as brand loyalty factor). The effects of inventory levels can also positively (a stock out benefit) or negatively (a stock out loss) influence the stock out factor. A generalized inventory-level-demand inventory model using the demand rate as a function of displayed inventory is integrated into the product assortment and shelf space allocation model by Urban (1998). The model presented is a deterministic and continuous-review inventory system, where the demand rate is constant as long as store inventory levels (both back room and shelf space) exceed the shelf space allocation. The assumption is that the shelves are kept fully stocked with continuous replenishment serviced from the back room inventory stock. Once the back room inventory is used up, and as the inventory on the shelf decreases, then the demand rate will decrease for which the typical demand function that is used in the space allocation models is presented in the polynomial form. While this demand rate function considers the substitution effect from an un-stocked item (not carried in the assortment) to a stocked item, this function does not consider temporary out-of-stock items in the normally carried assortment. Moreover, the grocery retail stores have little backroom space. By maintaining a backroom stock increases the holding cost (e.g. storing and handling), and therefore the grocery retailers would prefer zero backroom stock. In this paper a new approach is developed to address the shelf space allocation problem specific to new grocery retail stores (and not necessarily affiliated with a grocery chain). Ideally the decision rules regarding the initial shelf space allocation should consider the trade-off between profit contributions and operating costs of each product in the category. However (in this paper), a more complex allocation model would incorporate consumer behavior based on the consumer s decision process. Assuming that market research information about consumer behavior is available a demand function that reflects consumer behavior actions can also developed and utilized in the initial shelf space allocation model. The following sections describe the development of the new demand function that considers consumer behavior impacts on product demand and how it could be applied for initial shelf space allocation (and more specifically, at new grocery retail stores). A numerical example for this allocation model is provided, followed by a sensitivity analysis on the flexibility parameter in the model. Finally, conclusions and suggestions for future research are provided.
5 INITIAL SHELF SPACE CONSIDERATIONS AT NEW GROCERY STORES 187 Development of model This section first discusses consumer behavior issues that affect the in-store demand for aproduct. Next, a new demand function is developed that directly considers these consumer behavior impacts on product demand. Finally, an initial shelf space allocation model is developed that utilizes the new demand function. Consumer behavior issues The actual or final demand (referred here as resulting demand) for a product at retail store is a function of two general factors: consumers preferences prior to entering the store, and influences on these preferences due to in-store displays of products. Conceptually, the resulting demand function consists of five consumer behavior components based on four general elements: (1) natural demand for a product in the category assortment, (2) switching effects due to display effects and product proliferation, (3) substitution effects due to products not carried, and (4) randomness due to lack of preference. The conceptual framework used for the formulation of the resulting demand function is presented in Figure 1. Figure 2 that illustrates the consumer behavior and decision process, and Figure 3 illustrates the sources of demand for product i. The demand function in this study extends the demand model presented by Borin et al. (1994) by including the effects of product variety and identified likely consumer responses to out-of-stock conditions presented by Emmelhainz, Stock and Emmelhainz (1991) and Campo, Gijsbrechts and Nisol (2000), and is also a modification of the typical demand formulation used in space-allocation models as presented by Urban (1998, p. 25). It is assumed that an analyst (or in the more general case: the entrepreneur) predefines which products are included in the category assortment (as is commonly done in the initial stage) and that the consumer behavior probabilities are available from marketing research organizations. Terms that are used for the formulation of the resulting demand function are defined in Table 1. Figure 1. Conceptual framework used for the resulting demand function.
6 188 REYES AND FRAZIER Table 1. Term Definitions of variables for the resulting demand function. Definition N is the set of all products in the market for a category N + is the set of products in a category that are included in the assortment selection N is the set of products in a category that are not included in the assortment selection α i is the natural demand for product i λ i is the probability of product loyalty for product i when i is in stock γ ij is the probability of switching from product i to product j when i is in stock µ i is the probability of product loyalty for product i when i is not carried β i is the probability of substituting another product when i is not carried d i is the expected resulting demand rate for product i s N + is the total shelf space allocated to the product category s i is the shelf space allocated to a product i, i N + Figure 2. Consumer behavior and decision process. As mentioned above, a product s sales within the store are a combination of the natural demand rate for the product, the effects of product switching due to in-store product displays, substitution occurrences due to products not carried in the category assortment, and random selection when there is no preference. Each of these components is discussed next. The natural demand rate α i is defined here as the demand rate for product i by customers when they arrive at the store, before they are influenced by what they see on the shelves. This is an out-of-store decision prior to the shopping trip. However, this
7 INITIAL SHELF SPACE CONSIDERATIONS AT NEW GROCERY STORES 189 Figure 3. Sources of demand for product i. natural demand rate can be disrupted by the effects of the in-store environment, such as the proliferation of the other category products in the assortment, their displayed inventory levels, and price. The consumer is then confronted with the in-store decision to either purchase their initial preference or switch to another product in the category assortment that is carried by the grocery retail store. This buying behavior is contingent in part on the consumer s degree of loyalty λ i forproduct i, and therefore the respective probability of switching from product i to product j (denoted as γ ij ). The relationship is mathematically expressed as λ i + j j i j N + γ ij = 1; i N + (1)
8 190 REYES AND FRAZIER where N is the set of all products in the market for a category, N + is the set of products in a category that are included in the store s assortment selection, N is the set of products in a category that are not included in the store s assortment selection, and N = N + + N. (2) Another in-store decision due to the proliferation of product effects is when the consumer s first preference is not normally stocked by the grocery retail store. In this case, the decision is to either remain loyal to their first preference and not buy, or substitute to a second preference. Therefore, a second measure of the consumer s degree of loyalty (denoted as µ i )applies when product i is not in stock. Then the respective probability of substituting another product for product i is denoted as β i. The relationship for these probabilities is mathematically expressed as µ i + β i = 1. (3) There may also be consumers who do not have an a priori preference for a specific product in the category, but do have a demand for some product in the category. This buying behavior is referred to here as randomness, and has been used in previous research (for example see Anderson and Amato (1974)). By understanding these components of buying behavior, a resulting demand function for a specific product of the category can be formulated. It is reasonable to assume that the switching and substitution probabilities can be estimated by the use of marketing research to provide better insights into the demand components. In formulating demand functions, economists in past research have employed various means for estimating demand for differentiated products. However, as pointed out by Stavins (1997); recent studies by Trajtenberg (1990), Berry (1994), Feenstra and Levinsohn (1995), and Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes (1995) offer no agreement on the best method to find estimated demand elasticities. In fact, the proliferation of products in a category has resulted in analysts placing strong restrictions on demand in order to avoid thousands of elasticities having to be estimated. In other models, it is assumed that products are only competing with one or two of their nearest neighboring competitors (Feenstra and Levinsohn, 1995). Two types of product elasticities are incorporated into the proposed demand function to represent two types of consumers behavior for switching away from their first preference when it is in stock. The first type, cross elasticity, is the likelihood of switching between two products due to differences in packaging, price, features, or other characteristics inherent in the products. The more similar two products are, the greater is their cross elasticity. Cross-elasticity has been used in demand models by Curhan (1973), Hansen and Heinsbrock (1979), and Borin et al. (1994). It is assumed here that cross elasticities can be obtained through marketing research and would be available from marketing research firms. The second type, cross-space elasticity, is the likelihood of switching between two products due to differences in the amount of shelf space allocated to each product. Marketing research studies in the literature suggests that consumers are more attracted
9 INITIAL SHELF SPACE CONSIDERATIONS AT NEW GROCERY STORES 191 by larger displays of products (i.e., more shelf space) (Anderson, 1979; Bultez and Naert, 1988; Corstjens and Doyle, 1981, 1983; Urban, 1998, 2002). In the current study, cross-space elasticity is replaced by a ratio of the relative difference in shelf space allocated to two products. For example: 1 + s i s k s N + = s N + + s i s k s N + (4) represents the relative difference of shelf space allocated to product i with respect to shelf space allocated to product k, expressed as a percentage of total category shelf space. This yields a multiplicative factor centered around 1.0, which is used to adjust the cross elasticity to account for differences in shelf space allocations. The benefit of this ratio is the ease of estimating cross-space elasticities. Development of the resulting demand function Before summarizing the resulting demand function, each component of the function is explained next. The first component is the natural demand, or the consumer s first preference prior to the shopping trip, and is represented by α i. (5) The next two components represent switching to or from another product when both products are in stock. Switching may occur as a result of in-store product support. The in-store product support is the support given to the shelf space, such as the displayed inventory level and/or the frequency of stock replenishment. The second component represents switching from i to l. This is represented by multiplying γ il,which represents the probability of switching from product i to product l, by the shelf space allocation ratio, and then multiplying by the natural demand for the first preference γ il l l N + s N + + s l s i α i. (6) s N + Similarly, the third component represents switching from product l (the first preference) to product i. γ li l l N + s N + + s i s l α l. (7) s N + The significance of these two components is that the switching effects either reduce or add to the resulting demand for a product. The fourth component addresses the situation where a consumer may make a prebuying decision to purchase a product from the category, but does not have any preference for a particular brand. This no preference effect (randomness) assumes that each
10 192 REYES AND FRAZIER product carried in the grocery retail store category assortment has a probability of being selected in proportion to its relative amount of shelf space, as represented by s i s N + α R, (8) where α R is the demand rate from this group of customers. Because of limited shelf space, a grocery retail store cannot possibly carry the entire set of possible products in a category. Therefore only a limited assortment will be stocked. So for those products that are not carried in the assortment, there will also be a portion of their respective natural demands that is substituted or transferred to those products that are carried in the category assortment by the grocery retail store. This fifth component is represented by β j j j N s i s N + α j, (9) where product j is not carried in the category assortment. Hence the resulting demand for a product consists of five consumer behavior components: 1. The natural demand from the consumer s first preference 2. The potential switching to another product that is carried in the category assortment 3. The potential switching from another product that is carried in the category assortment 4. The randomness effect due to no initial first preference 5. The substitution effect due to demand for a product that is not carried in the category assortment These five components are also shown in the formula component column in Figure 3. From these five components (5) (9) for consumer behavior, the resulting demand for a single product within a category is mathematically expressed by the additive function: Component: (1) (2) (3) d i = α i l l N + i l s N + + s l s i γ il α i + s N + l l N + l i s N + + s i s l γ li α l s N + (4) (5) + s i α R + s i β j α j. (10) s N + s j N + j N
11 INITIAL SHELF SPACE CONSIDERATIONS AT NEW GROCERY STORES 193 Table 2. Term c i C i w i P i O H N + x Definitions of variables for the shelf space allocation model. Definition Purchase cost for product i Inventory operating cost for product i Gross margin contribution for product i Selling price to the consumer for product i Ordering cost rate expressed as $/order Holding cost rate expressed as daily % of unit cost Category profits for the products included in the assortment selection Range of flexibility for shelf space allocation given to grocery manager Formulating the objective function This section develops the objective function of the shelf space allocation model. Terms used in this model are defined in Table 2. Each component of the objective function is first discussed before the function is summarized. The first component represents total gross profit per day for the entire category of n products, and is given as n w i d i, (11) i=1 where w i is the gross margin contribution for product i. The marginal rate per unit is defined by w i = p i c i, (12) and the assumption is that the selling price to the consumer (p i ) and the product purchase cost (c i )arefixed. The cost side of the objective function considers the fixed cost and the variable costs associated with product i. There are four primary factors that contribute to operating expense associated with the inventory costs for the category. They are purchase cost, ordering cost, holding cost, and stock out cost. The purchase cost is accounted for in the gross margin contribution. Since the objective function is to allocate shelf space considering the potential substitution and switching effects, we assume that the stock out costs are near zero and therefore not included in the inventory cost function. The ordering cost rate (O) is assumed to be a constant rate for all products in the category and is given in dollars per order. Multiplying the ordering cost rate by the expected number of orders per day d i /s i (assuming no safety stock is used) gives O d i s i, (13) resulting in an estimated ordering cost stated in dollars per day.
12 194 REYES AND FRAZIER The daily holding cost rate (H) for the category is given as a percentage of the purchase cost of an item. Multiplying the holding cost rate by the shelf space allocation ratio gives us Hc i s i, (14) which results in an estimated holding cost that is higher for products that are more costly and have a greater shelf space allocation. The total operating costs per day (C i ) forproduct i is then expressed as C i = O d i s i + Hc i s i. (15) Combining (11) and (15) results in the objective function summarized as or N + = N + = n w i d i i=1 n C i (16) i=1 n (p i c i ) d i i=1 n i=1 ( O d ) i + Hc i s i. (17) s i Formulating the constraints Three types of constraints are included in the problem formulation. The first constraint addresses the shelf space allocated to the entire category. This space constraint requires that the space allocated to all products must equal the total available shelf space for the category, s N +. n s i = s N + (18) i=1 The second type of constraint addresses lower and upper limits, which is common in retailing. The reason for this is to maintain the store s image by stocking at least reasonable minimum quantities of each product, and not have only the most profitable item stocked. Since allocating shelf space strictly in proportion to demand rates may not be optimal due to varying profit margins and operating costs, a level of flexibility is included for the retailer. Hence, base-level shelf space allocations in proportion to natural demand are considered and then the retailer is provided some flexibility in the shelf space allocation for maximizing category profits. The base-level shelf space
13 INITIAL SHELF SPACE CONSIDERATIONS AT NEW GROCERY STORES 195 allocation is expressed mathematically as s 0 i = α i n i=1 α i s N +. (19) Note that if a constant demand rate (d i )isused instead of the resulting demand function presented in the previous section, then the constant rate d i would replace α i in equation (19) to obtain s 0 i.from this base-level allocation, we can then set the lower and upper constraints on the shelf space allocation at some desired range (i.e., x = 20%) from the base level. These are represented as and s i (1 x) s 0 i (20) s i (1 + x) s 0 i (21) respectively. Finally, the last type of constraints requires that the decision variables be nonnegative integers. The model is then formulated by combining formulas (16), (18), (20), and (21). The objective of the shelf space allocation problem is to maximize the net category profits ( N +), providing that the total shelf space assigned equals the shelf space allocated for the category and allowing some degree of flexibility to the grocery manager in the allocation assignment. In summary, the shelf space allocation problem is mathematically expressed as Max N + = n w i d i n C i i=1 i=1 Subject to: n s i = s N + i=1 s i (1 x) s 0 i s i (1 + x) s 0 i s i > 0, Integer. This is a non-linear integer programming optimization problem that can be solved using widely available numerical search approaches. It is important to note that although the resulting demand function from the previous section was used in the objective function above, any demand function could be used instead.
14 196 REYES AND FRAZIER Table 3. Input variables and parameters for products in the category. Product Product Product Natural demand Loyalty selling price purchase cost rate probability 1 p 1 = 2.99 c 1 = 0.59 α 1 = 5 λ 1 = p 2 = 2.49 c 2 = 0.49 α 2 = 4 λ 2 = p 3 = 2.79 c 3 = 0.56 α 3 = 3 λ 3 = p 4 = 2.29 c 4 = 0.46 α 4 = 2 λ 4 = α 5 = 3 µ 5 = α 6 = 2 µ 6 = 0.80 Random α R = 2 - Numerical example Consider an example where the category contains six products, for which only four are carried in the product assortment by the grocery retailer. The input variables (e.g., product selling price and product purchase cost) and the input parameters (e.g., natural demand rates and loyalty probabilities) are found in Table 3. Note that the loyalty probabilities are λ i for those products that are carried in the category assortment and µ j for those products that are not carried in the category assortment at the grocery retail store. The probability of substitution (β j )when a product is not carried in the category assortment can then be determined (e.g.; β 5 = 1 µ 5 = 0.40 and β 6 = 1 µ 6 = 0.20). The four products that are being carried in the category assortment are to be allocated to a finite space. In this example, the entire shelf space for the category will contain 90-units (i.e., S N + = 90). The lower and upper shelf space constraints are ±20% of the base-level allocation, and are s i 0.8si 0 and s i 1.2si 0,respectively. Additional input parameters are the potential switching probabilities of an instock product. They are found in Table 4. Notice that the loyalty probabilities are in the main diagonal. It is also assumed that ordering cost (O) and holding cost (H) are known. These costs were estimated based on first-hand interviews with the dry grocery manager at a local grocery store (Houser, 2002; Salmon, 2002). Hence in this example, the category ordering cost is estimated from the time to review inventories and place orders, the Table 4. Potential switching of an In-Stock product. To Product 1 Product 2 Product 3 Product 4 From Product Product Product Product
15 INITIAL SHELF SPACE CONSIDERATIONS AT NEW GROCERY STORES 197 transportation costs, and the handling costs of re-stocking the shelves. The category ordering costs is estimated at $3 and the category holding costs is estimated as 25% of the purchase unit cost. Then by expanding the summation, substituting for the input variables, and the input parameters, the shelf-space allocation model can be rewritten as: Subject to: Max N + ) = ( s1 [ [90(1 0.90) s s s 4 s 1 (1 0.90)] [(90 + s 1)( ) (0.08 4s s s 4 )] + s 1 90 (2) + s ] 1 ( ) ( s 1 ) 90 ) [ + ( s [90(1 0.85) s s s 4 s 2 (1 0.85)] [(90 + s 2)( ) (0.05 5s s s 4 )] + s 2 90 (2) + s ] 2 ( ) ( s 2 ) 90 ) [ + ( s [90(1 0.80) s s s 4 s 3 (1 0.80)] [(90 + s 3)( ) (0.03 5s s s 4 )] ( s 2 ) + s 3 90 (2) + s ] 3 ( ) ( s 3 ) 90 ) [ + ( s [90(1 0.75) s s s 3 s 4 (1 0.75)] [(90 + s 4)( ) (0.02 5s s s 3 )] + s 4 90 (2) + s ] 4 ( ) 90 ( s 4 ) s 1 + s 2 + s 3 + s 4 = 90 s
16 198 REYES AND FRAZIER s s s s s s s s 1 0, s 2 > 0, s 3 > 0, s 4 > 0 s 1, s 2, s 3, s 4, Integers. The results were found using Lingo non-linear optimization software, which uses a branch-and-bound algorithm. The shelf space assignment solution for maximizing net category profits per day is, with the shelf space allocated as follows: s 1 = 38 s 2 = 25 s 3 = 16 s 4 = 11. Sensitivity analysis The lower and upper bound constraints in equations (20) and (21) allow the retailer (or the entrepreneur) some flexibility in allocating space to the various products in the category. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine distribution of shelf space and profits due to the lower and upper bound constraints. The optimization model was processed with varying lower and upper bounds depending on the percentage value used for x in equation (20) and (21). The six different model runs were in increments of 10 percentage points, starting with the base of ±10% and going up to ±50%. Figure 4 presents how the shelf space allocation changes with each set of lower and upper bounds. The shelf space allocation numerical results are presented in Table 5, along with the daily category profits. The shelf space allocation changes with each ±10% -increment by allocating more space to the product(s) with a higher gross margin contribution (w).the net changes for each ±10%-increment is shown in Table 5, and in Figure 5. Although increasing the amount of flexibility (x)results in increasing category profits, the associated imbalance in shelf space allocations must be weighted against the desire to have a reasonable mix of products on the shelves. The retailer must decide how much flexibility should be reasonable in this case. A sensitivity analysis, such as presented here, can assist the retailer in making the best decision. This 4-product example required 4 decision variables with 9 constraints. The shelfspace allocation model could be easily applied to a much larger product category. For
17 INITIAL SHELF SPACE CONSIDERATIONS AT NEW GROCERY STORES 199 Table 5. Shelf space allocation and daily category net profits for each ±10%. ±0% ±10% ±20% ±30% ±40% ±50% s s s s N ( N + ) ( N + )% Figure 4. Shelf space allocation and daily category net profits for each ±10%. Figure 5. Daily category net profits for each ±10%.
18 200 REYES AND FRAZIER example, a category with 40 products carried in the category assortment would require 40 decision variables and 81 constraints. Conclusion and future research In this paper the formulation of a theoretical resulting demand function began by identifying five consumer behavior components. Conceptually, these components are made up of four general elements: (1) the natural demand rate for a product in the category assortment, (2) the switching effect due to product proliferation, (3) the substitution effect as a result of items that are not carried by the store, and (4) randomness. The natural demand rate was defined as an out-of-store decision prior to the shopping trip, while the other elements are in-store decisions that may disrupt the natural demand rate, and they were defined as effects of the environment. The environmental effects were described as the switching and substitution effects and some degree of randomness. The advantage of this approach is simple. In today s information age environment, the category manager (or the grocery retail entrepreneur) increasingly has access to consumer response information (i.e. marketing research). The environmental effects are influenced by the products that are carried in the category assortment, the shelf space allocation to those products, and the degree of consumer loyalty for a particular product. The decision-maker generally makes the first two decisions once or twice a year, whereas the degree of consumer loyalty may vary throughout the year. These environmental effects were kept constant in this study. Hence, the inputs used to determine the resulting demand function were (1) the natural demand rates, (2) shelf space allocation, (3) the probability of product loyalty when it is in stock, and (4) the probability of product loyalty when the product is not in stock. Therefore, understanding these input components should provide better insights into the resulting demand. An initial shelf space allocation model that incorporates the resulting demand function was formulated. This non-linear integer optimization model seeks to assign shelf space to each product in order to maximize the daily category profits. The objective function included the gross marginal contribution, the resulting demand function proposed, and the operating costs for all products within a category. Three sets of constraints were used in formulating this model. The first was to ensure that all of the available shelf space is. The second and third sets of constraints were used to allow the retailer some flexibility in lower and upper bounds on the shelf space assignments. It should be pointed out that the usefulness of the shelf space allocation model presented here does not depend on the form of the demand function that is that any form can be used for the demand function, even a constant demand rate. However, one contribution of this study is the separate treatment of switching and substitution buying behavior components in the demand function, which provides better insights into the true sources of demand for a product.
19 INITIAL SHELF SPACE CONSIDERATIONS AT NEW GROCERY STORES 201 One limitation of this study is that only a single product category was considered. One possible extension for future research would be to develop demand functions for several related product categories, which might include complementary products (such as razors and shaving cream). Another extension would be to consider potential stockouts and time-dependent variables in managing the shelf space. Dynamic order points could be developed that consider product substitution and current inventory levels of other products. To summarize, the contributions of this study are both theoretical and practical. A better understanding of the consumer buying behavior and decision making process and then incorporating these sources of demand into an allocation problem should lead to more robust decision-making tools. This research provides a tool for grocery entrepreneurs to make good shelf space allocation decisions and yet have some degree of flexibility to both maximize category profits and maintain a reasonable product mix. References Anderson, E An analysis of retail display space: Theory and methods. Journal of Business, 52: Anderson, E. & Amato, H A mathematical model for simultaneously determining the optimal brandcollection and display-area allocation. Operations Research, 22: Bawa, K., Landweher, J. & Krishna, A Consumer responses to retailers marketing environments: An analysis of coffee purchase data. Journal of Retailing, 65: Berry, S Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. Rand Journal of Economics, 25: Berry, S., Levinsohn, J. & Pakes, A Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica, 63: Borin, N., Farris, P. & Freeland, J A model for determining retail product category assortment and shelf space allocation. Decision Sciences, 25: Bultez, A. & Naert, P SH.A.R.P.: Shelf allocation for retailers profit. Marketing Science, 7: Bultez, A., Naert, P., Gijsbrechts, E. & vanden Abeele, P Asymmetric cannibalism in retail assortment. Journal of Retailing, 65: Campo, K., Gijsbrechts, E. & Nisol, P Towards understanding consumer response to stock-outs. Journal of Retailing, 76: Corstjens, M. & Doyle, P A dynamic model for strategically allocating retail space. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 34: Corstjens, M. & Doyle, P A model for optimizing retail space allocations. Management Science, 27: Cox, K The effects of shelf space upon sales of branded products. Journal of Marketing Research, 7: Cox, K The responsiveness of food sales to shelf space changes in supermarkets. Journal of Marketing Research, 1: Emmelhainz, M., Stock, J. & Emmelhainz, L Consumer responses to retail stock-outs. Journal of Retailing, 67: Feenstra, R. & Levinsohn, J Estimating markups and market conduct with multidimensional product attributes. Review of Economic Studies, 62: Hansen, P. & Heinsbrock, H Product selection and space allocation in supermarkets. European Journal of Operational Research, 3: Judd, L.& Vaught, B Three differential variables and their relation to retail strategy and profitability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16:
20 202 REYES AND FRAZIER McIntyre, S. & Miller, C The selection and pricing of retail assortments: An emperical approach. Journal of Retailing, 75: Nielsen Category management: Positioning your organization to win. American Marketing Association, NTC Business Books. Stavins, J Estimating demand elasticities in a differentiated product industry: The personal computer market. Journal of Economics and Business, 49: Trajenberg, M Economic analysis of product innovation: The case of CT scanners. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Urban, T The interdependence of inventory management and retail shelf management. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 32: Urban, T An inventory-theoretical approach to product assortment and shelf-space allocation. Journal of Retailing, 74: Yang, M.-H An efficient algorithm to allocate shelf space. European Journal of Operational Research, 131: Yang, M.-H. & Chen, W-C A study on shelf space allocation and management. International Journal of Production Economics, 60 61: Zufryden, F New computational results with a dynamic programming approach for product selection and supermarket shelf-space allocation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38: Zufryden, F A dynamic programming approach for product selection and supermarket shelf-space allocation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 37:
RETAIL SHELF SPACE ALLOCATION ANALYSIS USING SYSTEM DYNAMICS APPROACH
Journal of Quality and Technology Management Volume IX, Issue I, June 2013, Page 99 129 RETAIL SHELF SPACE ALLOCATION ANALYSIS USING SYSTEM DYNAMICS APPROACH ABSTRACT M.S.S. Jajja Institute of Business
More informationWRITTEN PRELIMINARY Ph.D. EXAMINATION. Department of Applied Economics. University of Minnesota. June 16, 2014 MANAGERIAL, FINANCIAL, MARKETING
WRITTEN PRELIMINARY Ph.D. EXAMINATION Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota June 16, 2014 MANAGERIAL, FINANCIAL, MARKETING AND PRODUCTION ECONOMICS FIELD Instructions: Write your code
More informationModeling of competition in revenue management Petr Fiala 1
Modeling of competition in revenue management Petr Fiala 1 Abstract. Revenue management (RM) is the art and science of predicting consumer behavior and optimizing price and product availability to maximize
More informationUnderstanding UPP. Alternative to Market Definition, B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, forthcoming.
Understanding UPP Roy J. Epstein and Daniel L. Rubinfeld Published Version, B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics: Policies and Perspectives, Volume 10, Issue 1, 2010 Introduction The standard economic
More informationABSTRACT. The Problem Background
Determining Discounts For Perishable Inventory Tom Bramorski, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater ABSTRACT In this paper, we develop a model to help manage prices of perishable products in a grocery store.
More informationUsing Association Rules for Product Assortment Decisions in Automated Convenience Stores
Using Association Rules for Product Assortment Decisions in Automated Convenience Stores Tom Brijs, Gilbert Swinnen, Koen Vanhoof and Geert Wets Limburg University Centre Department of Applied Economics
More informationIntroduction to Analytics Tools Data Models Problem solving with analytics
Introduction to Analytics Tools Data Models Problem solving with analytics Analytics is the use of: data, information technology, statistical analysis, quantitative methods, and mathematical or computer-based
More informationCooperative game analysis of retail space-exchange problems
Lingnan University Digital Commons @ Lingnan University Staff Publications Lingnan Staff Publication 1-16-2014 Cooperative game analysis of retail space-exchange problems Mingming LENG Department of Computing
More informationSimple Market Equilibria with Rationally Inattentive Consumers
Simple Market Equilibria with Rationally Inattentive Consumers Filip Matějka and Alisdair McKay January 16, 2012 Prepared for American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings Abstract We study a market
More informationThis is a refereed journal and all articles are professionally screened and reviewed
Advances in Environmental Biology, 6(4): 1400-1411, 2012 ISSN 1995-0756 1400 This is a refereed journal and all articles are professionally screened and reviewed ORIGINAL ARTICLE Joint Production and Economic
More informationMarketing Analysis Toolkit: Customer Lifetime Value Analysis
9-511-029 REV: JANUARY 18, 2017 THOMAS STEENBURGH JILL AVERY Marketing Analysis Toolkit: Customer Lifetime Value Analysis Introduction Customers are increasingly being viewed as assets that bring value
More informationDemand for Niche Local Brands in the Fluid Milk Sector
Demand for Niche Local Brands in the Fluid Milk Sector Yizao Liu Assistant Professor Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Connecticut yizao.liu@uconn.edu Adam N. Rabinowitz Assistant
More informationAGEC 603. Introduction. Theory of Retail Competition. Retail Location and Market Competition
AGEC 603 Retail Location and Market Competition Introduction Role of locations change when firms sell products strictly to local customers Shift in focus in firm s location decisions Household behavior
More informationChapter 11. Decision Making and Relevant Information Linear Programming as a Decision Facilitating Tool
Chapter 11 Decision Making and Relevant Information Linear Programming as a Decision Facilitating Tool 1 Introduction This chapter explores cost accounting for decision facilitating purposes It focuses
More information1.. There are two complementary goods that are consumed together (each individual good
University of California, Davis Department of Economics Time: 3 hours Reading time: 20 minutes PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR THE Ph.D. DEGREE Industrial Organization June 22, 2004 Answer four of the six
More informationPerishable Inventory Challenges
Perishable Inventory Challenges Cecilie M. Damgaard, Vivi T. Nguyen, Hans-Henrik Hvolby *, and Kenn Steger-Jensen Centre for Logistics, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Aalborg University,
More informationPRODUCT ASSORTMENT UNDER CUSTOMER-DRIVEN DEMAND SUBSTITUTION IN RETAIL OPERATIONS
PRODUCT ASSORTMENT UNDER CUSTOMER-DRIVEN DEMAND SUBSTITUTION IN RETAIL OPERATIONS Eda Yücel 1, Fikri Karaesmen 2, F. Sibel Salman 3, Metin Türkay 4 1,2,3,4 Department of Industrial Engineering, Koç University,
More informationManagerial Economics, 01/12/2003. A Glossary of Terms
A Glossary of Terms The Digital Economist -A- Abundance--A physical or economic condition where the quantity available of a resource exceeds the quantity desired in the absence of a rationing system. Arbitrage
More informationPart II. Market power
Part II. Market power Chapter 3. Static imperfect competition Slides Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies Paul Belleflamme and Martin Peitz Cambridge University Press 2009 Introduction to Part
More informationPrice Planning. Marketing 2
Price Planning Marketing 2 Enduring Understanding: Pricing decisions can make or break a company. Essential Questions: How does supply and demand affect price? What factors affect pricing decisions? How
More informationDEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS
ISSN 0819-2642 ISBN 0 7340 2600 5 THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS RESEARCH PAPER NUMBER 944 JULY 2005 SNOBS AND QUALITY GAPS by Suren Basov Department of Economics The University of
More informationA Negotiation-based capacity-planning model
011-0263 A Negotiation-based capacity-planning model Kung-Jeng Wang (Corresponding author) and Shih-Min Wang Department of Industrial Management National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan
More informationChapter Summary and Learning Objectives
CHAPTER 11 Firms in Perfectly Competitive Markets Chapter Summary and Learning Objectives 11.1 Perfectly Competitive Markets (pages 369 371) Explain what a perfectly competitive market is and why a perfect
More informationStructural versus Reduced Form
Econometric Analysis: Hausman and Leonard (2002) and Hosken et al (2011) Class 6 1 Structural versus Reduced Form Empirical papers can be broadly classified as: Structural: Empirical specification based
More informationPricing Game under Imbalanced Power Structure
Pricing Game under Imbalanced Power Structure Maryam Khajeh Afzali, Poh Kim Leng, Jeff Obbard Abstract The issue of channel power in supply chain has recently received considerable attention in literature.
More informationOnline shopping and platform design with ex ante registration requirements
Online shopping and platform design with ex ante registration requirements O A Florian Morath Johannes Münster June 17, 2016 This supplementary appendix to the article Online shopping and platform design
More informationWITH the deregulation of electrical power systems, market
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, VOL. 15, NO. 3, AUGUST 2000 981 Optimization Based Bidding Strategies in the Deregulated Market Daoyuan Zhang, Yajun Wang, Peter B. Luh, Fellow, IEEE Abstract With the
More informationInformal Input Suppliers
Sergio Daga Pedro Mendi February 3, 2016 Abstract While a large number of contributions have considered how market outcomes are affected by the presence of informal producers, there is scarce empirical
More informationUniversity Question Paper Two Marks
University Question Paper Two Marks 1. List the application of Operations Research in functional areas of management. Answer: Finance, Budgeting and Investment Marketing Physical distribution Purchasing,
More informationUniversity of California, Davis
University of California, Davis Department of Economics Time: 3 hours Reading time: 20 minutes PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR THE Ph.D. DEGREE Industrial Organization September 20, 2005 Answer four of the
More informationKey words: Franchise Fees, Competition, Double Marginalization, Collusion
The Role of Franchise Fees and Manufacturers Collusion DongJoon Lee (Nagoya University of Commerce and Business, Japan) Sanghoen Han (Nagoya University of Commerce and Business, Japan) Abstract: This paper
More informationMULTI-PRODUCT RETAILERS AND THE SALE PHENOMENON
The following paper is protected by copyright law. It has not been reviewed for accuracy or quality, and the posting of it to the ERS website does not constitute endorsement by ERS. MULTI-PRODUCT RETAILERS
More informationBuyer Heterogeneity and Dynamic Sorting in Markets for Durable Lemons
Buyer Heterogeneity and Dynamic Sorting in Markets for Durable Lemons Santanu Roy Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas. October 13, 2011 Abstract In a durable good market where sellers have private
More informationChapter 7 : Planning Merchandise Assortments
Learning Objectives Understand concept of Open to buy and its advantages Learn about factors that affect assortment plans Develop the range plans and model stock plan Tools used for merchandise planning
More informationExtended Model Formulation of the Proportional Lot-Sizing and Scheduling Problem. Waldemar Kaczmarczyk
Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services Vol. 5 2011 No. 1 2 pp. 49 56 Extended Model Formulation of the Proportional Lot-Sizing and Scheduling Problem with Lost Demand Costs Waldemar Kaczmarczyk
More informationPPT th Edition
PPT 13-1 5 th Edition Chapter 13 Buying Systems PPT McGraw-Hill/Irwin 13-2 Levy/Weitz: Retailing Management, 5/e Copyright 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Merchandise Management
More informationOptimal Inventory Allocation under Substitutable Demand
Optimal Inventory Allocation under Substitutable Chi-Yang Tsai Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan Tel: (+886) 3-463-8800, Email: iecytsai@saturn.yzu.edu.tw
More information8/23/2011. Chapter 10 Retail Pricing. Learning Objectives. Pricing Objectives and Policies
Chapter 10 Retail Pricing Learning Objectives Discuss the factors a retailer should consider when establishing pricing objectives and policies. Describe the differences between the various pricing strategies
More information1.. Consider the following multi-stage game. In the first stage an incumbent monopolist
University of California, Davis Department of Economics Time: 3 hours Reading time: 20 minutes PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION FOR THE Ph.D. DEGREE Industrial Organization June 27, 2006 Answer four of the six
More information^ Springer. The Logic of Logistics. Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. for Logistics Management. David Simchi-Levi Xin Chen Julien Bramel
David Simchi-Levi Xin Chen Julien Bramel The Logic of Logistics Theory, Algorithms, and Applications for Logistics Management Third Edition ^ Springer Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 What Is Logistics Management?
More informationChapters 1 and 2 Trade Without Money and A Model of Money
Chapters 1 and 2 Trade Without Money and A Model of Money Main Aims: 1. Answer following two questions: Why money is used as a medium of exchange? How and why money improves allocations in an economy and
More informationResponse to Out of Stock Produce and its Underlying Economic Considerations. Jerrod Penn, Aris Matopoulos, and Lisa House
Response to Out of Stock Produce and its Underlying Economic Considerations Jerrod Penn, Aris Matopoulos, and Lisa House Penn is an undergraduate student in Economics and research intern in Food and Resource
More informationOMGT2146. Supply Chain Analysis and Design. Introduction to Modeling. Course Information. Week 1
OMGT2146 Supply Chain Analysis and Design Week 1 Introduction to Modeling COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on
More informationThe Management of Marketing Profit: An Investment Perspective
The Management of Marketing Profit: An Investment Perspective Draft of Chapter 1: A Philosophy of Competition and An Investment in Customer Value Ted Mitchell, May 1 2015 Learning Objectives for Chapter
More informationIe And Em Proceedings 2009 Ieee 16Th International Conference On Industrial Engineering And Engineering Management, 2009, p.
Title An efficient approach for shelf space planning and display area allocation in convenience stores Author(s) Chu, LK Citation Ie And Em 2009 - Proceedings 2009 Ieee 16Th International Conference On
More informationMathematical Theory and Modeling ISSN (Paper) ISSN (Online) Vol.5, No.4, 2015
Simplified Methods of fitting the truncated Negative Binomial Distribution: A model that allows for Non users 1 Akomolafe Abayomi. A,and 2 Akinyele Atinuke. 1. Lecturer, Department of Mathematical Sciences,Ondo
More informationThe Relationship between Pricing and Consumers Switching Costs: Comparisons between the Myopic and Perfect-foresight Equilibria
International Business Research; Vol. 10, No. 3; 2017 ISSN 1913-9004 E-ISSN 1913-9012 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Relationship between Pricing and Consumers Switching Costs:
More informationOn the Use of Optimization for Data Mining: Theoretical Interactions and ccrm Opportunities
On the Use of Optimization for Data Mining: Theoretical Interactions and ccrm Opportunities Balaji Padmanabhan The WhartonSchool University of Pennsylvania Alexander Tuzhilin Stern School of Business New
More informationBid rent model for simultaneous determination of location and rent in land use microsimulations. Ricardo Hurtubia Michel Bierlaire
Bid rent model for simultaneous determination of location and rent in land use microsimulations Ricardo Hurtubia Michel Bierlaire STRC 2011 May 2011 STRC 2011 Bid rent model for simultaneous determination
More informationTRANSPORTATION PROBLEM AND VARIANTS
TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM AND VARIANTS Introduction to Lecture T: Welcome to the next exercise. I hope you enjoyed the previous exercise. S: Sure I did. It is good to learn new concepts. I am beginning to
More informationYOUR MOST IMPORTANT DECISION!
YOUR MOST IMPORTANT DECISION! Let me ask you a question. Do you think increasing your sales would be a good thing? If I told you that your price was too low, would you still think increasing sales would
More informationIdentification of the oligopoly solution concept in a differentiated-products industry
Economics Letters 59 (1998) 391 395 Identification of the oligopoly solution concept in a differentiated-products industry Aviv Nevo* 549 Evans Hall [3880, Department of Economics, UC Berkeley, Berkeley,
More informationSimple Market Equilibria with Rationally Inattentive Consumers
Simple Market Equilibria with Rationally Inattentive Consumers By Filip Matějka and Alisdair McKay In some markets, it is difficult for consumers to evaluate the offers made by firms. The literature on
More informationA nash equilibrium game and pareto efficient solution to a cooperative advertising
IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: 78-578, p-issn: 319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 1 Ver. V (Jan - Feb. 015), PP 100-104 www.iosrjournals.org A Nash Equilibrium Game and Pareto Efficient Solution
More information2010 Merger Guidelines: Empirical Analysis. Jerry Hausman, MIT 1
2010 Merger Guidelines: Empirical Analysis Jerry Hausman, MIT 1 Empirical analysis of mergers has advanced significantly since the 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines were issued. 2 In particular, direct
More informationOn Optimal Multidimensional Mechanism Design
On Optimal Multidimensional Mechanism Design YANG CAI, CONSTANTINOS DASKALAKIS and S. MATTHEW WEINBERG Massachusetts Institute of Technology We solve the optimal multi-dimensional mechanism design problem
More informationThe Retail Space-Exchange Problem with. Pricing and Space Allocation Decisions 1
The Retail Space-Exchange Problem with Pricing and Space Allocation Decisions 1 Mingming Leng, 3, Mahmut Parlar 4, Dengfeng Zhang 5 A 010 Revised A and N 011 Accepted N 011 To appear in Production and
More informationOnline shopping and platform design with ex ante registration requirements. Online Appendix
Online shopping and platform design with ex ante registration requirements Online Appendix June 7, 206 This supplementary appendix to the article Online shopping and platform design with ex ante registration
More informationQuasi linear Utility and Two Market Monopoly
Quasi linear Utility and Two Market Monopoly By Stephen K. Layson Department of Economics 457 Bryan Building, UNCG Greensboro, NC 27412 5001 USA (336) 334 4868 Fax (336) 334 5580 layson@uncg.edu ABSTRACT
More informationMultiple Equilibria and Selection by Learning in an Applied Setting
Multiple Equilibria and Selection by Learning in an Applied Setting Robin S. Lee Ariel Pakes February 2, 2009 Abstract We explore two complementary approaches to counterfactual analysis in an applied setting
More informationThe point at which revenue is equal to costs.
Glossary Avoidable fixed costs Fixed costs that a company does not have to incur but may experience. Benefit Segmentation A type of market segmentation in which customers are grouped based on the benefits
More informationReading Essentials and Study Guide
Lesson 1 Market Structures ESSENTIAL QUESTION How do varying market structures impact prices in a market economy? Reading HELPDESK Academic Vocabulary theoretical existing only in theory; not practical
More informationFactors Involved in Retailer s Decision to Allocate Shelf Space to Private and National Brand and its Impact on Sales
Factors Involved in Retailer s Decision to Allocate Shelf Space to Private and National Brand and its Impact on Sales Hashim Zameer Institute of Management Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan
More informationCh.01 Introduction to Modeling. Management Science / Instructor: Bonghyun Ahn
Ch.01 Introduction to Modeling Management Science / Instructor: Bonghyun Ahn Chapter Topics The Management Science Approach to Problem Solving Model Building: Break-Even Analysis Computer Solution Management
More informationRobust Supply Function Bidding in Electricity Markets With Renewables
Robust Supply Function Bidding in Electricity Markets With Renewables Yuanzhang Xiao Department of EECS Email: xyz.xiao@gmail.com Chaithanya Bandi Kellogg School of Management Email: c-bandi@kellogg.northwestern.edu
More informationMarket mechanisms and stochastic programming
Market mechanisms and stochastic programming Kjetil K. Haugen and Stein W. Wallace Molde University College, Servicebox 8, N-6405 Molde, Norway E-mail: Kjetil.Haugen/Stein.W.Wallace@himolde.no 18.12.01
More informationPricing and Return Policy Decision for Close Loop Dual Channel Supply Chain
Pricing and Return Policy Decision for Close Loop Dual Channel Supply Chain MIHIR SOLANKI 1, JAINAV SHAH 2, 1 Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, G H Patel College of Engineering
More informationYOUR MOST IMPORTANT DECISION!
YOUR MOST IMPORTANT DECISION! Let me ask you a question. Do you think increasing your sales would be a good thing? If I told you that your price was too low, would you still think increasing sales would
More informationOptimal Dynamic Pricing of Perishable Products Considering Quantity Discount Policy
Journal of Information & Computational Science 10:14 (013) 4495 4504 September 0, 013 Available at http://www.joics.com Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Perishable Products Considering Quantity Discount Policy
More informationPrice Optimization. Buying and Merchandising: Right price, right time, right channel, automatically
01 Buying and Merchandising: Right price, right time, right channel, automatically 02 03 Your Challenges Modern price decision-making processes are characterized by leveraging immense data volumes while
More informationEconomics of Information and Communication Technology
Economics of Information and Communication Technology Alessio Moro, University of Cagliari October 5, 2017 What are digital markets? ICT technologies allow firms to sell their products online. The internet
More informationResearch Article Integrated Production-Distribution Scheduling Problem with Multiple Independent Manufacturers
Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 2015, Article ID 579893, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/579893 Research Article Integrated Production-Distribution Scheduling Problem with Multiple Independent
More informationIntroduction - Simulation. Simulation of industrial processes and logistical systems - MION40
Introduction - Simulation Simulation of industrial processes and logistical systems - MION40 1 What is a model? A model is an external and explicit representation of part of reality as seen by the people
More informationThe Concept of Bottleneck
The Concept of Bottleneck Saral Mukherjee (Speaker) A. K. Chatterjee Abstract The paper provides a classification of bottleneck definitions available in literature and discusses several myths associated
More informationINTRODUCTION MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS CHAPTER ONE. ECON340: Managerial Economics Ch.1 Dr. Mohammed Alwosabi. Dr. Mohammed Alwosabi MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION TO MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS Dr. Mohammed Alwosabi Economics and Managerial Decision Making Managerial economics is one of the most important and useful courses. It will provide you
More informationOptimizing the supply chain configuration with supply disruptions
Lecture Notes in Management Science (2014) Vol. 6: 176 184 6 th International Conference on Applied Operational Research, Proceedings Tadbir Operational Research Group Ltd. All rights reserved. www.tadbir.ca
More informationSection 1: Introduction
Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design (1991) By Bengt Holmstrom and Paul Milgrom Presented by Group von Neumann Morgenstern Anita Chen, Salama Freed,
More informationEvaluating the Economic Impact of Decarbonisation Policies in Road Transport
Evaluating the Economic Impact of Decarbonisation Policies in Road Transport Theodoros Zachariadis Associate Professor and Dean Faculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management Cyprus University
More informationIntroduction to quantitative methods
Introduction to quantitative methods BSAD 30 Fall 2018 Agenda Introduction to quantitative methods Dave Novak Source: Anderson et al., 2015 Quantitative Methods for Business 13 th edition some slides are
More informationProduction Planning under Uncertainty with Multiple Customer Classes
Proceedings of the 211 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, January 22 24, 211 Production Planning under Uncertainty with Multiple Customer
More informationConcept of Oligopoly 1 CONCEPT OF OLIGOPOLY
Concept of Oligopoly 1 CONCEPT OF OLIGOPOLY By Course Tutor Date Concept of Oligopoly 2 Concept of Oligopoly applying real data and theory An oligopoly can be defined as a market structure in which few
More informationDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Extension Education & Rural Sociology, College of Agriculture
Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension Education & Rural Sociology, College of Agriculture DEMAND AND SUPPLY MODELS- FORMULATIONS, ESTIMATION AND PROJECTIONS Presented by: Deeksha (A-2016-30-027)
More informationChapter 4. Models for Known Demand
Chapter 4 Models for Known Demand Introduction EOQ analysis is based on a number of assumptions. In the next two chapters we describe some models where these assumptions are removed. This chapter keeps
More informationIntroduction. Managerial Problem. Solution Approach
Monopoly Introduction Managerial Problem Drug firms have patents that expire after 20 years and one expects drug prices to fall once generic drugs enter the market. However, as evidence shows, often prices
More informationEmpirically Distinguishing Informative and Prestige Effects of Advertising
Empirically Distinguishing Informative and Prestige Effects of Advertising (Ackerberg, 2001 RAND) Department of Information, Operations and Management Sciences Stern School of Business, NYU padamopo@stern.nyu.edu
More informationECONOMICS SOLUTION BOOK 2ND PUC. Unit 6. I. Choose the correct answer (each question carries 1 mark)
Unit 6 I. Choose the correct answer (each question carries 1 mark) 1. A market structure which produces heterogenous products is called: a) Monopoly b) Monopolistic competition c) Perfect competition d)
More informationDesigning Price Incentives in a Network with Social Interactions
Designing Price Incentives in a Network with Social Interactions Maxime C. Cohen Operations Research Center, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, maxcohen@mit.edu Pavithra Harsha IBM Research Thomas J. Watson Research
More informationAula 1: 2.1 Demand 2.2 Supply 2.3 Market Equilibrium 2.4 Shocking the Equilibrium: Comparative Statistics
Chapter 2 Supply and Demand Chapter 2 Outline Aula 1: 2.1 Demand 2.2 Supply 2.3 Market Equilibrium 2.4 Shocking the Equilibrium: Comparative Statistics Aula 2: 2.5 Elasticities 2.6 Effects of a Sales Tax
More informationFirms, Quality Upgrading and Trade. Ian Sheldon The Ohio State University
Firms, Quality Upgrading and Trade Ian Sheldon The Ohio State University Presentation delivered at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC) Clearwater
More informationUse Multi-Stage Model to Target the Most Valuable Customers
ABSTRACT MWSUG 2016 - Paper AA21 Use Multi-Stage Model to Target the Most Valuable Customers Chao Xu, Alliance Data Systems, Columbus, OH Jing Ren, Alliance Data Systems, Columbus, OH Hongying Yang, Alliance
More informationChapter 14 TRADITIONAL MODELS OF IMPERFECT COMPETITION. Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved.
Chapter 14 TRADITIONAL MODELS OF IMPERFECT COMPETITION Copyright 2005 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved. 1 Pricing Under Homogeneous Oligopoly We will assume that the
More informationManaging risks in a multi-tier supply chain
Managing risks in a multi-tier supply chain Yash Daultani (yash.daultani@gmail.com), Sushil Kumar, and Omkarprasad S. Vaidya Operations Management Group, Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow-226013,
More informationEdexcel (B) Economics A-level
Edexcel (B) Economics A-level Theme 4: Making Markets Work 4.1 Competition and Market Power 4.1.1 Spectrum of competition Notes Characteristics of monopoly, oligopoly, imperfect and perfect competition
More informationEstimating Discrete Choice Models of Demand. Data
Estimating Discrete Choice Models of Demand Aggregate (market) aggregate (market-level) quantity prices + characteristics (+advertising) distribution of demographics (optional) sample from distribution
More informationE-Learning Course: Understanding Retail
E-Learning Course: Understanding Retail Target Audience This program is designed for people who sell or market to retailers. It is ideal for both merchandise suppliers who sell directly to retailers, and
More informationLogistic and production models (contd..)
g) Multiple plants Logistic and production models (contd..) In this section it is assumed that a manufacturing company has a network of M production plants, located in geographically distinct sites that
More informationApplying Stackelberg Game to Find the Best Price and Delivery Time Policies in Competition between Two Supply Chains
Int. J. Manag. Bus. Res., 2 (4), 313-327, Autumn 2012 IAU Applying Stackelberg Game to Find the Best Price and Delivery Time Policies in Competition between Two Supply Chains 1 M. Fathian, *2 M. Narenji,
More informationA Note on Expanding Networks and Monopoly Pricing
A Note on Expanding Networks and Monopoly Pricing Jean J. Gabszewicz and Filomena Garcia CORE Discussion Paper 2005/95 Abstract We obtain explicitly the optimal path of prices for a monopolist operating
More informationThe Retailers Choices of Profit Strategies in a Cournot Duopoly: Relative Profit and Pure Profit
Modern Economy, 07, 8, 99-0 http://www.scirp.org/journal/me ISSN Online: 5-76 ISSN Print: 5-745 The Retailers Choices of Profit Strategies in a Cournot Duopoly: Relative Profit and Pure Profit Feifei Zheng
More informationMeasuring long-term effects in marketing P.M Cain
Measuring long-term effects in marketing P.M Cain Conventional marketing mix models are typically used to measure short-term marketing ROI and guide optimal budget allocation. However, this is only part
More information