Introduction to Efficient Pricing
|
|
- Letitia Welch
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Introduction to Efficient Pricing Presented to: Edison Electric Institute s Advanced Rates Course University of Wisconsin, Madison Presented by: Philip Q Hanser Copyright 2012 The Brattle Group, Inc. July 23, Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International Arbitration International Trade Product Liability Regulatory Finance and Accounting Risk Management Securities Tax Utility Regulatory Policy and Ratemaking Valuation Electric Power Financial Institutions Natural Gas Petroleum Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, and Biotechnology Telecommunications and Media Transportation
2 What Do We Mean by Efficient Pricing? In the economists (and engineer s) view of the world, prices are efficient is they provide the right signals to customers about the costs of the goods they purchase, i.e., IF IT COSTS MORE TO PRODUCE, IT S PRICE IS HIGHER. In the utility world, this gets somewhat confused because rate of return regulation results in costs, which can be dominated by the history of investments the utility has made, i.e., Accounting costs actual production costs necessarily Marginal costs represent the true opportunity cost to the utility and should be reflected (notice term!) in rates. 2
3 Why Marginal Cost-Based Rates? Rates reflecting marginal costs mimic the presumed structure of prices in competitive markets, thus should be efficient prices Typical rates are usually only remotely reflective of the true cost to serve customers Embedded cost-based rates have averaged into them the entire history of investments by utility Is the cost of laying new conductor in downtown areas the same as that when the lines were originally constructed? All true costs are opportunity costs, avoids the fallacy of sunk costs FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION: What costs do you incur as a utility in providing an additional unit of service to a customer or to serve an additional customer at a specific time and location? 3
4 Some Market Organization Background Just as the ancients believed that the world is composed of four elements Earth, Wind, Fire, and Water. All of Rate Design is composed of four elements Generation, Transmission, Distribution, and Customers. However, the electric utility combines these four elements differently depending on whether your utility is integrated or not, whether it is in a regional transmission organization (RTO) or not, and if it is in an RTO, how the RTO is organized. 4
5 Traditional Markets Traditional Markets Comprised of primarily integrated utilities Price formation is entirely through regulation by public utility commissions. Utility performs the following functions Distribution Low voltage wires providing service to ultimate customer residential, commercial, small industrial Transmission Bulk power system Provides highway connecting generation to distribution system Largest customers connect at the voltage levels of transmission system Interconnection to other utilities provides reliability enhancement and potential for economic interchange Generation Owned by utility Economic dispatch 5
6 Traditional Markets Utility A Generator Utility B Generator Wholesaler/Transmitter Wholesaler/Transmitter Distributor Distributor Customer Customer Decentralized Bilateral Trade 6
7 Three Primary Generation Types 1. Baseload High capital costs, low marginal energy costs Coal, nuclear 2. Intermediate Capital costs lower than baseload, but higher marginal energy costs Usually fairly flexible in varying output levels 3. Peaking Combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) is typical unit Low capital costs and short lead times to build High marginal energy costs Natural gas combustion turbine (CT) is typical unit 7
8 Other Generation Large scale hydroelectric Big dams 000 s MW Pondage provides storage Smaller scale hydroelectric Run-of-river Typically small MW s a few to 100 Biomass waste-to-energy primarily co-generators selling power to utility Renewable resources Typically characterized as high capital costs, but very low marginal energy costs, sometimes zero Characterized by intermittency of output Predictable, but largely controllable Geographic-specific Wind, solar thermal, solar PV 8
9 Restructured Markets - Wholesale Restructured Markets Regional transmission organizations (RTOs) Aggregated transmission system operated by independent system operator (ISO) whose primary function is to provide open access to the transmission system and balance supply and demand Utilities retain TX ownership, requirement for maintenance, expansion Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) sets RTO s rate and regulates Generation bid into market Some utilities have retained generation ownership New entrants Very loosely regulated by FERC Residual traditional utility, now known as Load-Serving Entity (LSE) or Local Distribution Company (LDC), operates and maintains the wires to retail customers Under wholesale competition Retains supplier role, purchasing on behalf of customers Under retail competition Residual obligations, Provider of Last Resort (POLR) In both approaches, regulated by state public utility commissions 9
10 Restructured Markets - Wholesale Wholesale competition - Centralized Market Design Genco Genco Genco Genco Genco ISO Wholesale Market Regional Transmission Organization LSE LSE LSE Large customer Consumers Consumers Consumers 10
11 Restructured Markets - Wholesale Centralized Wholesale Market/Decentralized Retail Market Genco Genco Genco Genco Genco ISO Wholesale Market Regional Transmission Organization Retailer Retailer Retailer Large customer Retail market LSEs Consumer Consumer Consumer Consumer 11
12 Restructured Wholesale Market ISOs are also market-makers Multi-settlement market Day-ahead hourly market (DAM) Locational Marginal Prices (LMPs) calculated Originally, these were called Locational Marginal Cost prices. Real-time Real-time LMPs calculated Deviations from generation schedules (unscheduled outages) Deviations from forecasted bids or demand Day-after Generators paid based on schedule, LSEs pay based on projected or bid demands Suppliers and demanders charged for increased costs resulting from deviations from schedule by settling at real time prices Ancillary services markets Operating reserves Transmission-related VARs Capacity/Forward reserves market 12
13 The Logic of Dispatch Units Excess Capacity Demand Demand Spike Demand $ / MW $ / MW Supply Supply MW MW 13
14 Locational Marginal Prices Across a Day NY City Cinergy Central NY Locational Marginal Prices on August 1, 2002 NY City-PJM-Cinergy Prices ($/MWh) Source: New York ISO and Intercontinental Exchange Hour 14
15 Cost Element Traditional Centralized Restructured Decentralized Restructured Production (Generation) Utility supplies both energy and capacity. Investments and O&M are included in revenue requirements. RTO market provides energy and capacity. Investments and O&M are included in requirements, but netted against sales/purchases in RTO. Market provides both energy and capacity. Either generation costs from market are passed through or utility contracts on behalf of customer (POLR, etc.) Transmission Utility supplies transmission services. Investments and O&M are included in revenue requirements. RTO supplies network transmission services. As with generation, investments and O&M are included in revenue requirements, but netted against sales/purchases in RTO. RTO supplies network transmission services. Costs are passed through to customers. Distribution Utility supplies distribution services. Investments and O&M are included in revenue requirements. Utility supplies distribution services. Investments and O&M are included in revenue requirements. Utility supplies distribution services. Investments and O&M are included in revenue requirements. Customer Metering, customer services, connections, etc. supplied by utility. Investments and O&M are included in revenue requirements. Metering, customer services, connections, etc. supplied by utility. Investments and O&M are included in revenue requirements. Metering, customer services, connections, etc. supplied by utility. Investments and O&M are included in revenue requirements. 15
16 Steps in Developing Marginal Cost-Based Rates 1. Carrying charges annualizing investments 2. Marginal Generation Costs a) Marginal generation capacity costs b) Marginal generation energy costs 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs 4. Marginal Distribution Costs a) Marginal distribution customer-related costs b) Marginal distribution capacity-(demand)-related costs 5. Determine appropriate costing periods 6. Attributing costs to costing periods 7. Adjustment of marginal costs for losses 8. Reconciling marginal cost-based rates with revenue requirements 16
17 Steps in Developing Marginal Cost-Based Rates 1. Carrying charges annualizing investments 2. Marginal Generation Costs a) Marginal generation capacity costs b) Marginal generation energy costs 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs 4. Marginal Distribution Costs a) Marginal distribution customer-related costs b) Marginal distribution capacity-(demand)-related costs 5. Determine appropriate costing periods 6. Attributing costs to costing periods 7. Adjustment of marginal costs for losses 8. Reconciling marginal cost-based rates with revenue requirements 17
18 1. Carrying Charges Annualizing Investments The capacity costs generation, transmission, distribution and the customer costs represent investments made by the utility over a particular time span, say one to several years, but whose lives are considerably longer, say 15 to 30 years. Converting those lumpy investments into annual costs is called annualization. Two kinds of carrying charges Levelized (nominal) Economic (real) 18
19 1. Illustration of Alternative Carrying Charges For purposes of these examples assume Weighted average incremental cost of capital = 12% Inflation rate = 6% Investment life = 30 years Present value of revenue requirements per dollar of investment = 1.3, i.e., a $1 investment has a PVRR of $
20 1. Illustration of Alternative Carrying Charges Assumptions: r = the weighted average incremental capital cost = 12% e = the rate of inflation = 6% N = the book life of the investment = 30 years I = the initial investment cost = $1.00 K = the present value of revenue requirements = 1.3 x I. Capital Recovery Factor: = Ir (1+r) n =.1241 or 12.41% (1+r) n -1 Levelized Carrying Charge: = Kr (1+r) n =.1641 or 16.14% (1+r) n -1 (or = 1.3 x.1241) Economic Carrying Charge: = K(r-e) (1+r) n =.0965 or 9.65% (1+r) n - (1+e) n 20
21 1. Comparison of Carrying Charges in Nominal Dollars Revenue Requirement $ Economic Carrying Charge Levelized Carrying Charge Years 21
22 1. Comparison of Carrying Charges in Constant Dollars $ Revenue Requirement Economic Carrying Charge Levelized Carrying Charge Years 22
23 Steps in Developing Marginal Cost-Based Rates 1. Carrying charges annualizing investments 2. Marginal Generation Costs a) Marginal generation capacity costs b) Marginal generation energy costs 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs 4. Marginal Distribution Costs a) Marginal distribution customer-related costs b) Marginal distribution capacity-(demand)-related costs 5. Determine appropriate costing periods 6. Attributing costs to costing periods 7. Adjustment of marginal costs for losses 8. Reconciling marginal cost-based rates with revenue requirements 23
24 2. Marginal Generation Costs Marginal Generation Capacity Costs If in a regional transmission organization (RTO), easy either penalty for failing to have adequate capacity or price set in capacity market; if not in an RTO, need to answer the question: If demand increased a non-trivial amount, say 50 MW, how would the utility respond in the most economic manner while maintaining the same level of reliability? Load (MW) 1,000 1 KW MC = cost/kw (1000/500) RM KW Hours 24 7,000 8,760
25 2. Marginal Generation Costs Marginal Generation Capacity Costs (cont d) Two primary approaches: So-called NERA peaker method A combustion turbine has low capital costs, although its fuel efficiency is relatively low CT on a flatbed System planning approach What is the least cost adjustment to planned capacity additions needed to meet the increase in load and maintain the same reliability? How would the system planner respond to the change in load? How would the resource plan change? Move up the schedule of planned resource additions Add new resources 25
26 2. Marginal Generation Costs Marginal Generation Capacity Costs (cont d) System planning method steps 1. Determine planned response to a change in forecast load growth 2. Determine capacity cost per kilowatt of response 3. Annualize the capacity costs 4. Add the O&M per kw 5. Compute and deduct any fuel or other savings per kw 6. Adjust for reserve margin; ancillary services, etc. An aside on measures of reliability Loss of load probability (LOLP) Probability that load exceeds resource capability Loss of energy probability (LOEP) Percent of energy that will be unable to meet with current resource capability LOLP as a reliability is appropriate only when marginal outage cost does not vary with the magnitude of the shortages. 26
27 Marginal Capacity Costs Using the System Planning Method: Planner Builds Combustion Turbine Minimum Capacity Required: Requirement Met By: 60 MW Building a combustion turbine Marginal Cost Annualized Cost of a Turbine (2012$): $58/kW (580 x 10%) Fixed O&M: $2/kW Reserve Margin: 20% Adjusted Annual Cost: $72/kW (30 x 1.2) 27
28 2. Marginal Capacity Costs Using the System Planning Method: Planner Moves CCGT Unit Forward (2010$) Minimum Capacity Required: Requirement Met By: 60 MW Accelerating a CCGT unit by one year Marginal Cost CCGT Annualized Capacity Cost: $230/kW Fixed O&M: $6/kW CCGT Fuel Savings: $63.3 million (Discounted Over Entire Life) Other Savings: $1.8 million (45 x 40,000) (Won t Need to Purchase Firm Power) Fuel and Other Savings per kw: $186/kW (65.1 million/350,000) Net Capacity Cost: $50/kW ( ) Reserve Margin Adjustment: $60/kW (20.00 x 1.2) 28
29 2. Marginal Generation Costs Marginal Energy Costs For utilities in an RTO, use locational marginal prices (LMPs) In rate design, load serving entity s (LSE) averaged LMPs across load can be used For locationally-targeted demand-side management (DSM) programs, more appropriate to use LMPs in/near targeted areas Need to go through bills from RTO to cull out energy-related costs: ancillary services, etc. For utilities not in RTO, use system lambda (λ): Hourly System Lambda for a Typical Day Hour Ending System Lambda (mills/kwh) Hour Ending System Lambda ($/MWh) 1 a.m a.m p.m a.m
30 Steps in Developing Marginal Cost-Based Rates 1. Carrying charges annualizing investments 2. Marginal Generation Costs a) Marginal generation capacity costs b) Marginal generation energy costs 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs 4. Marginal Distribution Costs a) Marginal distribution customer-related costs b) Marginal distribution capacity-(demand)-related costs 5. Determine appropriate costing periods 6. Attributing costs to costing periods 7. Adjustment of marginal costs for losses 8. Reconciling marginal cost-based rates with revenue requirements 30
31 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs In an RTO, utility can use network service charge (or transmission service charge). Needs to be adjusted for losses, which will be discussed later. Some utilities in an RTO have some transmission and whose costs are not included in the RTO tariff within their service territory. They will need to do calculations similar to those for non-rto utilities. For many RTO utilities, the issue is which transmission investments are peak demand-related. Some typical reasons for transmission investments: a) To transfer power from generation to the distribution system (capacity must be great enough to serve peak, even in the event of outages b) To maintain or increase the reliability of the power system c) Old equipment replacement d) Tying remote generation to the central transmission system e) Interconnecting with other utilities Which are peak demand-related Certainly a & b. What about the rest? 31
32 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs (cont d) Three common methods: Actual Loads Method Use historical data and unitize peak demand-related investments based on observed growth in demand Some problems Fails to account for construction lead times Actual loads may differ from expected loads which were the basis for investments Lead Time Method Use load growth over period beginning, for example, three years after first investments considered in analysis and ending three years after the last investment Solves contemporaneity problem of actual loads method, but still uses actual rather than expected demand 32
33 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs (cont d) System Planning Method Uses expected loads as the basis for unitizing costs Regardless of method chosen need to additionally: Annualize unit costs Add O&M expenses 33
34 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs (cont d) Three Methods for Determining Transmission Peak Load Additions Peak-Related Transmission Investments (2012$): $28,283,000 Growth in System Peak Load (MW) Actual Loads Method Lead-Time Method System Planning Method Total Load Growth: : : :
35 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs (cont d) The Unitization of Peak-Related Transmission Investments: (2012 Dollars) Actual Loads Method Lead-Time Method System Planning Method Additional Peak-Related Investment $28,283,000 $28,283,000 $28,283,000 Growth in System Peak (kw) 170, , ,000 Unitized Cost (2010$/kW): = (1) / (2) $166.37/kW $104.75/kW $81.98/kW 35
36 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs (cont d) The Calculation of Transmission O&M Costs Transmission O&M Price Index Transmission O&M System Peak Average O&M Cost (Nominal $000) 2010 = Base (2010 $000) (MW) (2010 $/kw) 2009 $1, $1,647 1,938 $ , ,769 1, , ,495 1, ,911 5,
37 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs (cont d) Steps in calculating marginal transmission capacity costs 1. Determine analysis period (can include historical and forecast, possibly several different periods) 2. Convert investments into constant dollars 3. Categorize transmission investments as peak and nonpeak related 4. Using either of these three methods above, use load additions as basis for investments 5. Unitize investment costs 6. Annualize the unitized costs 7. Add operations and maintenance costs 37
38 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs (cont d) Summary of the Calculation of Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs (2010 Dollars) Total peak-related transmission Investment ( ): $28,283,000 Total planned load growth (system planning estimate): Utilized Cost 345,000 kw $81.98/kW Annualized cost per kw: $8.20/Kw (81.98 x.10) Transmission O&M cost: Marginal transmission capacity cost: $0.85/kW $9.05/kW 38
39 Steps in Developing Marginal Cost-Based Rates 1. Carrying charges annualizing investments 2. Marginal Generation Costs a) Marginal generation capacity costs b) Marginal generation energy costs 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs 4. Marginal Distribution Costs a) Marginal distribution customer-related costs b) Marginal distribution capacity-(demand)-related costs 5. Determine appropriate costing periods 6. Attributing costs to costing periods 7. Adjustment of marginal costs for losses 8. Reconciling marginal cost-based rates with revenue requirements 39
40 4. Marginal Distribution Costs Marginal distribution costs consists of two components Marginal distribution capacity (or demand) costs Marginal customer costs The distribution between these costs is not always clear Marginal distribution customer-related costs methods are Minimum system approach Zero-intercept approach Engineering approach 40
41 4. Marginal Distribution Costs Customer Related Costs The steps in the minimum system method are: 1. Determine the minimum-sized equipment currently installed minimum pole height, conductor size, transformer size, service length, etc. 2. Multiply the minimum-sized equipment by the total capacity (i.e., actual numbers of poles installed, circuit miles laid, number of transformers, numbers of services, etc.) 3. Multiply by the current as expected (for future years) installed cost 4. Unitize the customer-related marginal costs, using the number of customers served by that portion or voltage level of the distribution system 5. Annualize the investment costs 6. Add customer-related O&M and customer account costs 41
42 4. Marginal Distribution Costs Customer Related Costs (cont d) The steps in the zero-intercept method are: 1. Determine the analysis period 2. Convert all distribution cost data, net of meters and services, to constant dollars 3. Separate distribution by voltage levels, i.e., primary and secondary 4. For each voltage level analyzed, relate total distribution costs to peak load using a trend or linear regression analysis 5. Extrapolate the trends to zero load and determine costs at zero load 6. Unitize the costs using the number of customers by voltage level, i.e., primary and secondary 7. Add the costs of meters and services 8. Annualize the investment costs 9. Add customer-related O&M and customer account costs Optimally, the analysis will be forward-looking, but inevitably some historical data will be used. N.B., this method sometimes produces negative customer costs. 42
43 4. Marginal Distribution Costs Customer Related Costs (cont d) Constant Dollar Distribution Plant Versus Peak Load (2010 Dollars) Distribution Plant ($000) Distribution Plant ($000) Primary Voltage Secondary Voltage , ,500 Peak Load 0 0 Peak Load 43
44 4. Marginal Distribution Costs Customer Related Costs (cont d) Zero Intercept Method Summary Secondary Voltage Primary Voltage Zero load plant investment:* $15,500,000 $17,500,000 Number of customers: 100, ,000 Unitized cost: $155 $100 Plant cost by voltage level: $255 $1,090 ($155 + $100) Meters and services: $225 $1,010 Total Cost: $480 $2,200 *Excluding meters and services. 44
45 4. Marginal Distribution Costs Customer Related Costs (cont d) The steps in the engineering approach are: 1. Obtain average line length extension and average transformer costs from data on customer installations, all on a unitized basis 2. If need be, disaggregate costs to reflect differing geographic conditions, building code requirements, infrastructure growth in undeveloped areas 3. Annualize the investment costs 4. Add customer-related O&M and customer account costs 45
46 4. Marginal Customer Costs Marginal Distribution Capacity-Related Costs Steps for estimating marginal distribution capacity costs 1. Determine time span to be analyzed 2. Classify distribution plant as either demand or customer-related 3. Separate demand-related plant by voltage levels, i.e., primary and secondary levels 4. Convert all investments to constant dollars 5. Determine planned load growth by voltage level; i.e., primary and secondary levels 6. Unitize the investment costs 7. Annualize the unitized costs 8. Add O&M Costs Summary of Annualized Distribution Capacity Costs (2010$) Primary voltage level: Secondary voltage level: $5.99 per kw per year $16.51 per kw per year 46
47 Steps in Developing Marginal Cost-Based Rates 1. Carrying charges annualizing investments 2. Marginal Generation Costs a) Marginal generation capacity costs b) Marginal generation energy costs 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs 4. Marginal Distribution Costs a) Marginal distribution customer-related costs b) Marginal distribution capacity-(demand)-related costs 5. Determine appropriate costing periods 6. Attributing costs to costing periods 7. Adjustment of marginal costs for losses 8. Reconciling marginal cost-based rates with revenue requirements 47
48 5. Determine Appropriate Costing Periods Costing periods attempt to capture variations in marginal capacity and energy costs for a system over the course of a year. Costing periods are not the same as rating periods, but are developed as a step prior to rating periods. The goal is to group hours that are similar in their cost causation. For utilities in RTOs, grouping by LMP is likely to be the easiest approach, since the RTO s cost variations will likely determine the rating periods. However, the distribution utility may wish to group hours based on a maximum stress to the distribution system. For utilities not in RTOs, the usual approaches use metrics such as: LOLP System Loads System Lambda (similar to using LMPs) The approaches include simple groupings to sophisticated statistical analyses such as cluster analysis. 48
49 Steps in Developing Marginal Cost-Based Rates 1. Carrying charges annualizing investments 2. Marginal Generation Costs a) Marginal generation capacity costs b) Marginal generation energy costs 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs 4. Marginal Distribution Costs a) Marginal distribution customer-related costs b) Marginal distribution capacity-(demand)-related costs 5. Determine appropriate costing periods 6. Attributing costs to costing periods 7. Adjustment of marginal costs for losses 8. Reconciling marginal cost-based rates with revenue requirements 49
50 6. Attributing Costs to Costing Periods Marginal Capacity Costs Marginal capacity- (or demand-) related costs are annual and so must be attributed to the costing periods developed above. For utilities in RTOs, LMPs may be a proxy for a reliability measure such as LOLP, but they may not. It is probably useful to check with the RTO to determine if they can provide some form of hourly reliability index. For utilities not in RTOs, three common measures are: LOLP Reserve margins Probability of negative margin We illustrate below the use of absolute LOLP and relative LOLP on the capacity allocation factors and the final cost attributions 50
51 6. Attributing Costs to Costing Periods Marginal Capacity Costs (cont d) Capacity Allocation Factors Derived From LOLP Costing Absolute LOLP % of Capacity Costs Period (Days in 10 yrs.) Relative LOLP Assigned to Period Summer: Peak % Off-Peak % Winter: Peak % Off-Peak % % 51
52 6. Attributing Costs to Costing Periods Marginal Capacity Costs (cont d) Attribution and Summary of Annualized Marginal Capacity Costs by Costing Period (2010 Dollars) COST BY PERIOD Summer Winter Total Cost Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak Relative LOLP Marginal generating capacity costs ($/kw) $24.00 $16.80 $1.34 $ Marginal transmission capacity costs ($/kw) $9.05 $6.34 $0.51 $ Marginal distribution capacity costs: Primary ($/kw) $5.99 $4.19 $0.34 $ Secondary ($/kw) $16.51 $11.56 $0.92 $
53 6. Attribution of Costs to Costing Period Marginal Energy Costs Calculating marginal energy costs by period consists of aggregating the hourly costs to broader costing periods. Three primary methods are used: Averaging all of the marginal energy costs in each period Selecting specific hourly costs that are arguably most representative of each period, for example, the mode of the highest marginal energy costs Weight-averaging, say by load, the marginal energy costs Simple averaging is most common. 53
54 6. Attribution of Costs to Costing Period Marginal Energy Costs (cont d) Summary of System Lambda By Period (2010 /kwh) Costing Average Period Summer: Peak Off-Peak Winter: Peak Off-Peak
55 Steps in Developing Marginal Cost-Based Rates 1. Carrying charges annualizing investments 2. Marginal Generation Costs a) Marginal generation capacity costs b) Marginal generation energy costs 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs 4. Marginal Distribution Costs a) Marginal distribution customer-related costs b) Marginal distribution capacity-(demand)-related costs 5. Determine appropriate costing periods 6. Attributing costs to costing periods 7. Adjustment of marginal costs for losses 8. Reconciling marginal cost-based rates with revenue requirements 55
56 7. Adjustment of Marginal Costs for Losses Losses occur when electrical energy is converted into heat energy. Think of an electric stove. Losses, as a percentage of throughput from one end of a line to the other, are greatest at low voltages. (For example, the economies from using high voltage direct current (HVDC) lines are largely due to their lower losses.) Thus, the losses at the service drop to the residential customer are greater than the losses for the service drop to the industrial customer because of the higher voltage the latter is connected at. Also, conversion from one voltage to another will incur losses. Thus, residential customers will have the highest loss factors because they receive power at the lowest voltage. The losses must be made up by additional generation. There are two varieties of losses that must be accounted for: Demand losses, which modify marginal capacity costs generation, transmission, and distribution Energy losses, which modify marginal energy costs Are marginal customer costs modified for losses? 56
57 7. Adjustment of Marginal Costs for Losses Marginal Capacity Costs The next table provides the demand loss multiplier for each voltage level. We assume transmission is at 115 kv, primary distribution at 13kV, and secondary at 4kV and lower. Thus, for a MW to be delivered at 4kV or lower, 1.09 MW needs to be generated. These factors are multiplicative. N.B. Some demand loss factors are defined not multiplicatively, but additively. You need to know which you are given. Just as marginal generation capacity costs must be modified, so too must marginal transmission and distribution costs. Although the demand loss multiplier for generation to the secondary voltage level is 1.09, if that were used for the loss-adjusted marginal transmission costs, it would overstate them. That is because 2.5% of the power is lost moving from generation to secondary voltage must be reduced (by dividing by 1.025) to to reflect that these are only the losses in going from transmission to secondary voltage. A similar reasoning holds in adjusting for losses in going from transmission to distribution, for adjusting for losses at the distribution level in going from primary to secondary. 57
58 7. Adjustment of Marginal Costs for Losses Marginal Capacity Costs (cont d) Summary of Demand Loss Multipliers Applicable to System Peak Voltage Level Demand Loss Multiplier Transmission (115 kv) Primary (13 kv) Secondary (4 kv and lower)
59 7. Adjustment of Marginal Costs for Losses Marginal Capacity Costs (cont d) Marginal Generation Capacity Costs Adjusted for Losses Marginal Generation Cost After Loss Adjustment Marginal Costing Transmission Primary Secondary Period Generation Level Voltage Voltage Voltage Summer: Peak $16.80 $17.22 $17.64 $18.31 Off-Peak Winter: Peak $5.86 $6.01 $6.15 $6.39 Off-Peak Demand-loss Multiplier:
60 7. Adjustment of Marginal Costs for Losses Marginal Capacity Costs (cont d) Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs Adjusted for Losses Loss-Adjusted Marginal Transmission Costs Marginal Transmission Costing the Primary Secondary Period Transmission Voltage Voltage Voltage Summer: Peak $6.34 $6.49 $6.74 Off-Peak $0.51 $0.52 $0.54 Winter: Peak $2.20 $2.25 $2.34 Off-Peak Demand-loss Multiplier: a b a The loss multiplier equals 1.05 divided by = b The loss multiplier equals 1.09 divided by =
61 7. Adjustment of Marginal Costs for Losses Marginal Capacity Costs (cont d) Marginal Primary Distribution Cost Adjusted for Losses Loss Adjusted Marginal Primary Marginal Primary Costing Distribution Cost Distribution Cost Period (Primary Voltage) (Secondary Voltage) Summer: Peak $4.19 $4.35 Off-Peak $0.34 $0.35 Winter: Peak $2.20 $1.52 Off-Peak 0 0 Demand-loss Multiplier: a a The loss multiplier equals 1.09 divided by 1.05, or
62 7. Adjustment of Marginal Costs for Losses Marginal Capacity Costs (cont d) SUMMARY OF LOSS-ADJUSTED MARGINAL CAPACITY COSTS (2010 Dollars per kw) Transmission Voltage Customer Costing Generation Transmission Total Margin Period Marginal Cost Marginal Cost Capacity Cost Summer: Peak $17.22 $6.34 $23.56 Off-peak $1.37 $0.51 $1.88 Winter: Peak $6.01 $2.20 $8.21 Off-peak $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Primary Distribution Voltage Customer Primary Total Costing Generation Transmission Distribution Marginal Period Marginal Cost Marginal Cost Marginal Cost Capacity Cost Summer: Peak $17.64 $6.49 $4.19 $28.32 Off-peak $1.41 $0.52 $0.34 $2.27 Winter: Peak $6.15 $2.25 $1.46 $9.86 Off-peak $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Secondary Distribution Voltage Customer Generation Transmission Distribution Total Costing Marginal Cost Marginal Cost Marginal Cost Capacity Cost Period Primary Secondary Summer: Peak $18.31 $6.74 $4.35 $11.56 $40.96 Off-peak $1.46 $0.52 $0.35 $0.92 $3.25 Winter: Peak $6.39 $2.34 $1.52 $4.03 $14.28 Off-peak $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $
63 7. Adjustment of Marginal Costs for Losses Marginal Energy Costs As was done for marginal capacity costs, marginal energy costs must also be adjusted for losses. Again, our approach is to use loss multipliers, in this case energy loss multipliers, to perform the calculations. Energy Loss Multipliers Costing Primary Secondary Period Transmission Voltage Voltage Voltage Summer: Peak Off-Peak Winter: Peak Off-Peak
64 7. Adjustment of Marginal Costs for Losses Marginal Energy Costs (cont d) Loss-Adjusted Marginal Energy Costs (2010 cents per kwh) Delivery Voltage Costing Transmission Primary Secondary Period Voltage Voltage Voltage Summer: Peak Off-Peak Winter: Peak Off-Peak
65 Marginal Cost-Based Rates Marginal Cost Calculation Complexities and Issues This has been a very brief overview. Here are some additional calculations not included, but which would be in a formal marginal cost-of-service analysis. Loadings for administrative and general (A&G), both plant and non-plant related Non-working capital materials and supplies, prepayments, etc. No associated revenue requirement If projects are staged over several years there may be contributions in aid of construction (CIAC) or Construction Work in Progress (WIP) calculations Distribution utility could substitute relative probability of peak in distribution system for the discussion of LOLP No inclusion of reserve margin in marginal distribution capacity costs 65
66 Steps in Developing Marginal Cost-Based Rates 1. Carrying charges annualizing investments 2. Marginal Generation Costs a) Marginal generation capacity costs b) Marginal generation energy costs 3. Marginal Transmission Capacity Costs 4. Marginal Distribution Costs a) Marginal distribution customer-related costs b) Marginal distribution capacity-(demand)-related costs 5. Determine appropriate costing periods 6. Attributing costs to costing periods 7. Adjustment of marginal costs for losses 8. Reconciling marginal cost-based rates with revenue requirements 66
67 8. Reconciling Marginal Costs Based Rates With Revenue Requirements Generally, the revenue that would be collected under marginal cost-based rates, whether standard blocked rates or dynamic rates such as time-of-use (TOU), will not precisely coincide with the revenue requirements permitted under an embedded cost of service study. Thus, the utility will need to adjust the marginal cost-based rates. The two adjustments are: Revenue reconciliation Revenue repression Revenue repression is more commonly applied to dynamic rates, such as TOU. 67
68 8. Reconciling Marginal Costs Based Rates With Revenue Requirements (cont d) Preliminary Marginal Cost Rates Customer Class Marginal Cost Accounting Cost Revenue % Change from Revenues Rev. Require. Gap Accounting Billing Units a ($ mil.) ($ mil.) ($ mil.) to Marginal Residential: Peak Demand: $5.00/kW/mo. 16,228 MW $ Energy: $57.00/MWh 1,234,153 MWh Off-Peak Demand: $2.00/MWh 17,395 MW Energy: $32.50/MWh 1,636,027 MWh Customer $14.18/mo. 4,094,652 Bills $ $ $ Commercial: Peak Demand: $4.60/kW/mo. 11,400 MW $ Energy: $7.00/MWh 1,171,841 MWh Off-Peak Demand: $1.82/MWh 14,400 MW Energy: $32.50/MWh 1,859,199 MWh Customer $60.00/mo. 522,132 Bill $ $ $ Industrial: Peak Demand: $4.20/kW/mo. 7,569 MW $ Energy: $55.00/MWh 1,077,533 MWh Off-Peak Demand: $1.70/MWh 12,832 MW Energy: $31.90/MWh 1,985,553 MWh Customer $ /mo. 29,436 Bills $ $ $ TOTAL $ $ $ a Total energy for the system is * 10 3 MWh Preliminary Rates 68
69 8. Reconciling Marginal Cost-Based Rates with Revenue Requirements Revenue Reconciliation The goal in revenue reconciliation is to do the least harm to the efficiency of the marginal cost-based rates. They are five broad categories of adjustments. Often they are combined for best results. Lump sum transfer Essentially a customer rebate. All customers receive a lump sum of many equal to their share of the difference between allowed revenues and projected revenues. If the marginal cost revenue is less than the allowed revenues, a lump sum surcharge is added to each bill. Inverse elasticity Marginal cost-based rates are adjusted more for those customers who have the most inelastic demand or to the component of the rate for which the demand is least elastic. Nearly impossible to distinguish customers with regard to price elasticity for each component of a rate. 69
70 8. Reconciling Marginal Cost-Based Rates with Revenue Requirements Revenue Reconciliation (cont d) Customer Charge Adjustment An application of the inverse elasticity rate. The difference between the allowed revenues and the marginal cost-based rate revenues is accomplished by adjusting the bill s customer cost component. Demand and energy remain priced at marginal cost. Results in unequal (sometimes very) customer class impacts. Demand Charge Adjustment Another application of the inverse elasticity rate. Same problems as with customer charge adjustment Equiproportional Adjustment Increases (or decreases) all rate components for all classes equally by a factor sufficient to yield the revenue requirement. A slight variation on this caps the increase or decrease at a percentage above (or below) the percent for the utility as a whole. Prevents extreme increases (or decreases). 70
71 8. Reconciling Marginal Cost-Based Rates with Revenue Requirements Revenue Reconciliation (cont d) Examples (Based on chart on next page) Lump Sum Transfer $43.98M surplus revenues. Using energy $43.98M/(8,965 x 10 4 kwh) $0.005/kWh or 5 mill/kwh. Since average residential customer uses 900 kwh/mo during peak four months, rebate $4.43/mo. 71
72 8. Reconciling Marginal Cost-Based Rates with Revenue Requirements Revenue Reconciliation (cont d) Inverse Elasticity Assume all customers price elasticity of demand during all rating periods -0.5 and for energy it is For industrial customers, for which $ (8.2%) would be overcollected yields the following rate: Peak Off Peak Demand ($/kw/ month) Energy ($/MWh) Customer: $1,000/month 72
73 8. Reconciling Marginal Cost-Based Rates with Revenue Requirements Revenue Reconciliation (cont d) Customer Charge If revenue reconciliation is small, a customer charge adjustment may be sufficient. For residential class the over-collection is $10.5M. Dividing this by the billing units yields a customer charge reduction $2.57/month and, thus, an adjusted customer charge of $11.61/month. Equiproportional Adjustment For the commercial class, marginal cost-based rate revenues exceed the revenue requirement by $17.9M or 7.5%. This, all elements of the rate would be reduced by 7.5%. 73
74 8. Reconciling Marginal Cost-Based Rates with Revenue Requirements Revenue Reconciliation (cont d) When a new rate structure or rate is introduced, customers respond by changing their loads. Utilities can account for the anticipated load changes in the billing determinants or through an adjustment account, much like a fuel adjustment clause, that restores revenues back to target levels. For reasons that are unknown to me, these are known as revenue repression mechanisms. Such mechanisms typically take one of two forms: Ex ante In ex ante mechanisms, the utility attempts to account for the load changes in the billing determinants. Ex post Ex post mechanisms attempt to adjust revenues after they have been filed and take effect. These two approaches can be combined. For example, a utility can implement a dynamic pricing program which, perhaps based on pilot information, attempts to account for customer response and which also has a periodic tune-up mechanism, perhaps a balancing account, which makes the utility whole between rate cases. 74
75 8. Reconciling Marginal Cost-Based Rates with Revenue Requirements Ex Ante Revenue Repression Residential consumption (annual kwh) Peak period 542,802,800 Off-peak period 361,369,200 TOTAL 904,172,000 Assumed consumption shift (5%) Adjusted peak 515,662,660 Adjusted off-peak 388,509,340 TOTAL 904,172,000 Allocated residential expenses (preadjustment) Period Costs Unit Costs ($/kwh) Peak $24,968, Off-peak $7,950, TOTAL $32,919, Allocated residential expenses (post-adjustment) Peak $24,751, Off-peak $7,770, TOTAL $32,521, In this example, the initial assumed flat rate is $0.036/kWh. The time differentiated rate is $0.046/kWh on-peak and $0.022/kWh off-peak. The example also assumes that there will be a shift in consumption from on-peak to the off-peak period of 5%. This is based on assumed on-peak price elasticity of: = -0.05/0.28 where 0.28 = ( )/0.36 i.e., the percentage change in rates going from the flat rate to the on-peak rate. Note that the implied off-peak price elasticity is only
76 8. Reconciling Marginal Cost-Based Rates with Revenue Requirements Ex Post Revenue Repression Generally, these are the steps in an ex post revenue repression mechanism: After the rate is in effect, utility compares revenues collected with anticipated revenues using billing determinants Utility calculates the difference between actual and expected and places this in adjustment pool Periodically, say every quarter, utility adjusts rate components for the increase/decrease in adjustment pool Ex Post Revenue Repression Adjustment Peak Off-Peak Total 1. Expected consumption (kwh) Expected revenue ($) $24,968, $7,950, $32,919, Actual consumption (kwh) Actual revenue ($) $23,720, $8,558, $32,278, Adjustment pool (2)-(4) ($) $1,248, $608, $640, Pool per kwh (5)/(3) ($/kwh) $ $ Base rate (per kwh) $ $ Adjustment clause (6) $ $
Outline. Introduction to Wisconsin. Barriers to Generating Electricity from. Incentives and Regulations Intended to
Experience of the United States in the Application of Incentives and Regulations for the Supply of Renewable Energy Chairperson Eric J. Callisto Public Service Commission of Wisconsin 20 May 2010 Outline
More informationREGULATORY FRAMEWORKS BEHIND DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCE MARKETS
REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS BEHIND DISTRIBUTED ENERGY RESOURCE MARKETS Joe Wharton, Ph.D. The Brattle Group Presented to Seminar on Transactive Energy & Distributed Markets Annenberg Auditorium Caltech April
More informationSTANDARD CONTRACT RIDERS - (Continued) RIDER NO. 9 DAY-AHEAD HOURLY PRICE SERVICE
THIRD REVISED PAGE NO. 89 CANCELLING SECOND REVISED PAGE NO. 89 RIDER NO. 9 DAY-AHEAD HOURLY PRICE SERVICE Day-ahead hourly price service provides large commercial and industrial customers with the ability
More informationHouse Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 15, Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy
House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 15, 2017 Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy At A Glance North Carolina 112 years of service 3.3 million retail customers in 83
More informationPJM Markets. Energy and Ancillary Services. PJM State & Member Training Dept. PJM /29/2014
PJM Markets Energy and Ancillary Services PJM State & Member Training Dept. LMP Basics 2 7/17/2013 What is LMP? Locational Marginal Price Pricing method PJM uses to: price energy purchases and sales in
More informationHouse Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 8, Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy
House Energy and Public Utilities Committee March 8, 2017 Kendal Bowman Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Policy At A Glance North Carolina 112 years of service 3.3 million retail customers in 83
More informationMARKET EFFICIENCY STUDY PROCESS AND PROJECT EVALUATION TRAINING
MARKET EFFICIENCY STUDY PROCESS AND PROJECT EVALUATION TRAINING December 22, 2014 Training Objectives To Provide an Overview of: The Market Efficiency proposal window process The critical modeling inputs
More informationThe Potential Impact of Solar PV on Electricity Markets in Texas SEIA and the Energy Foundation June 19, 2012
2012 SEIA 2012 SEIA The Potential Impact of Solar PV on Electricity Markets in Texas SEIA and the Energy Foundation June 19, 2012 2012 SEIA Agenda Introduction Carrie Cullen Hitt, SEIA Opening Comments
More informationNewfoundland Power Marginal Cost of Electricity Service Study
12. Marginal Cost Study Newfoundland Power Marginal Cost of Electricity Service Study Newfoundland Power 2008 General Rate Application Newfoundland Power Marginal Cost of Electricity Service Study Prepared
More informationATTACHMENT M-2 (PECO) Determination of Capacity Peak Load Contributions, Network Service Peak Load and Hourly Load Obligations PURPOSE
ATTACHMENT M-2 (PECO) Determination of Capacity Peak Load Contributions, Network Service Peak Load and Hourly Load Obligations PURPOSE This document outlines the process by which PECO determines Capacity
More informationCA NLH NLH General Rate Application Page 1 of 3
CA NLH 033 2013 NLH General Rate Application Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Q. (Rates and Regulation Evidence page 4.7, lines 5 to 12) Please provide updated marginal costs based on the methodology outlined
More informationPower Markets and Renewables Deployment in Developing Countries
Power Markets and Renewables Deployment in Developing Countries Goran Strbac Imperial College London g.strbac@imperial.ac.uk and Frank A. Wolak Stanford University wolak@zia.stanford.edu Outline of Presentation
More informationSPP at a Glance. Located in Little Rock. Approximately 600 employees
SPP at a Glance Located in Little Rock Approximately 600 employees Primary jobs electrical engineering, operations, settlements, and IT 24 x 7 operation Full redundancy and backup site 2 Regulatory Environment
More informationDo We Need ICAP? Ensuring Adequate Capacity in a Competitive Electricity Market
Do We Need ICAP? Ensuring Adequate Capacity in a Competitive Electricity Market Abram W. Klein Director, Strategic Analysis Edison Mission Marketing & Trading Prepared for: PJM Regional Conference presented
More informationJoanne Flynn David Cormie NFAT Technical Conference July 15, 2013
Joanne Flynn David Cormie NFAT Technical Conference July 15, 2013 1 Who is MISO? Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. Changing name to the Midcontinent t Independent d tsystem Operator,
More informationCUSTOMER GUIDE TO PJM BILLING
CUSTOMER GUIDE TO PJM BILLING Billing Line Items include PJM Open Access Tariff (OATT) references, PJM Operating Agreement (OpAgr) references, and PJM Manual references. Reports are available for viewing,
More informationSenate Bill 350 Study
Senate Bill 350 Study Volume VII: Ratepayer Impact Analysis PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY July 8, 2016 Senate Bill 350 Study The Impacts of a Regional ISO-Operated Power Market on California List of Report
More information5.1 Transmission Congestion Charge Calculation Calculation by Office of the Interconnection.
5.1 Transmission Congestion Calculation. 5.1.1 Calculation by Office of the Interconnection. When the transmission system is operating under constrained conditions, or as necessary to provide third-party
More informationMaintaining Baseload Generation Capacity
Maintaining Baseload Generation Capacity Frank A. Wolak Director, Program on Energy Sustainable Development Professor, Department of Economics Stanford University wolak@stanford.edu http://www.stanford.edu/~wolak
More informationNEWFOUNDLAND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DATA RESPONSES TO THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE. Provide a copy of the report to the Board concerning Newfoundland
NEWFOUNDLAND BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DATA RESPONSES TO THE CONSUMER ADVOCATE CA181 Provide a copy of the report to the Board concerning Newfoundland Power Company s Study of Innovative Approaches to
More informationCalifornia ISO. Q Report on Market Issues and Performance. February 10, Prepared by: Department of Market Monitoring
California Independent System Operator Corporation California ISO Q4 2013 Report on Market Issues and Performance February 10, 2014 Prepared by: Department of Market Monitoring Department of Market Monitoring
More informationSection 3 Characteristics of Credits Types of units. Economic Noneconomic Generation.
Section 3 Operating Reserve Operating Reserve Day-ahead and real-time operating reserve credits are paid to market participants under specified conditions in order to ensure that resources are not required
More informationAncillary Service Markets
Section 9 Ancillary Services Ancillary Service Markets The United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) defined six ancillary services in Order No. 888: 1) scheduling, system control and dispatch;
More informationSetting the Energy Bid Floor
Setting the Energy Bid Floor Frank A. Wolak Department of Economics Stanford University wolak@zia.stanford.edu http://www.stanford.edu/~wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee California ISO 1 Outline
More informationKey Issues and Consideration in Market Design, Operational and Oversight
Key Issues and Consideration in Market Design, Operational and Oversight Patrick Donlon Amanda Gordon Kathryn Sophy Kenneth Villwock Public Utilities Commission of Ohio & Pennsylvania Public Utilities
More information3.2 Market Settlements.
3.2 Market Settlements. If a dollar-per-mw-hour value is applied in a calculation under this section 3.2 where the interval of the value produced in that calculation is less than an hour, then for purposes
More informationDemand as an Active Actor Day 2, Item 1. Presented by: Flora Flygt XM Medellin, Columbia December 12-13, 2012
Demand as an Active Actor Day 2, Item 1 Presented by: Flora Flygt XM Medellin, Columbia December 12-13, 2012 1 Outline Introduction Demand Response Continuum Passive Demand Response Active Demand Response
More information3.2 Market Buyers Spot Market Energy Charges.
3.2 Market Buyers. 3.2.1 Spot Market Energy Charges. (a) The Office of the Interconnection shall calculate System Energy Prices in the form of Day-ahead System Energy Prices and Real-time System Energy
More informationElectricity Supply. Monthly Energy Grid Output by Fuel Type (MWh)
For the first quarter of 2015, Ontario experienced overall demand that was typical for the province in winter, and strong generator output. Demand for Ontario electricity increased as a result of cold
More informationCompetitive Markets 1
Competitive Markets 1 Why Regulation? Electric service has historically been considered a monopoly service The provision of electric service traditionally required huge investments in infrastructure Electricity
More informationPJM Wholesale Markets. Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E. Ohio PUC Staff October 20-24, 2014 Tbilisi, Georgia
PJM Wholesale Markets Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E. Ohio PUC Staff October 20-24, 2014 Tbilisi, Georgia PJM RTO Functions Grid Operation Non-discriminatory treatment Monitoring transmission system Reliability
More informationDifferences Between Electric and Natural Gas Cost of Service Studies
Differences Between Electric and Natural Gas Cost of Service Studies Bonnie Janssen June 28, 2018 Electric and Gas Utility COSS Similarities Uniform System of Accounts Revenue Requirements Load Data/Load
More informationBoardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project
Transmission Line Project Purpose and Need Meeting Summary South Advisory Area July 8, 2009 Four Rivers Cultural Center 676 SW 5th Avenue Ontario, OR 97914 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Welcome and
More informationChapter 2 POWER PRODUCTION ECONOMICS
Chapter 2 POWER PRODUCTION ECONOMICS Historically, governments have determined that electricity should not be provided by competitive firms. Similar decisions have been made for natural gas, water, sewer,
More informationNew York Independent System Operator, Inc. NYISO Tariffs. OATT Schedules
New York Independent System Operator, Inc. NYISO Tariffs OATT Schedules Document Generated On: 6/30/2010 Page 1 Contents 6 Schedules... 7 6.1 Schedule 1 Scheduling, System Control and Dispatch Service...
More informationELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY
DRAFT Report ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY Navajo Tribal Utility Authority August 2007 DRAFT NAVAJO TRIBAL UTILITY AUTHORITY ELECTRIC COST OF SERVICE AND RATE DESIGN STUDY Table of Contents
More informationDemand-Side Resources and Electricity Markets
Demand-Side Resources and Electricity Markets A Policy Agenda for New England Richard Cowart Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable March 23, 2001 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont
More informationEnergy Uplift (Operating Reserves)
Section 4 Energy Uplift Energy Uplift (Operating Reserves) Energy uplift is paid to market participants under specified conditions in order to ensure that resources are not required to operate for the
More informationEnergy Supply and Demand A Market Perspective
Energy Supply and Demand A Market Perspective Presented at: EnergySMART 2012 Conference Westin Hotel, Boston October 1-3, 2012 Presented by: Judy Chang (with contribution from Ahmad Faruqui and Metin Celebi)
More informationMethodology for calculating subsidies to renewables
1 Introduction Each of the World Energy Outlook scenarios envisages growth in the use of renewable energy sources over the Outlook period. World Energy Outlook 2012 includes estimates of the subsidies
More informationRecent Development in Reliable Energy Market in the US and Singapore
Recent Development in Reliable Energy Market in the US and Singapore 18-19 th June 2008 Electrical Engineering and Maintenance Forum World Engineering Congress, Bangkok, Thailand Dr. Panida Jirutitijaroen
More informationEconomics & Markets: Capacity Markets (Presentation to the CIAC) April 17 th, 2018
Economics & Markets: Capacity Markets (Presentation to the CIAC) April 17 th, 2018 The information contained in this document is for information purposes only, and the AESO is not responsible for any errors
More information2010 RTO Metrics Report: NESCOE Data Summary
New England States Committee on Electricity NESCOE Phone: 23-38-1477 E-Mail: AllisonSmith@nescoe.com Web: www.nescoe.com 21 RTO Metrics Report: NESCOE Data Summary Allison Smith ABSTRACT Summary of comparative
More informationCompetitive Markets. Facilitated Dialogue: Market Restructuring & Renewable Energy. June 10-12, 2013 Mexico City, Mexico. Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E.
Competitive Markets Facilitated Dialogue: Market Restructuring & Renewable Energy June 10-12, 2013 Mexico City, Mexico Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Energy and Environment Public Utilities
More informationRecent Trends and Experience in US Capacity Markets
Recent Trends and Experience in US Capacity Markets PRESENTED TO Solar Ontario Canadian Solar Industries Association PRESENTED BY Walter Graf November 14, 2018 Copyright 2018 The Brattle Group, Inc. Why
More informationAnalysis of Potential Impacts of CO 2 Emissions Limits on Electric Power Costs in the ERCOT Region
Analysis of Potential Impacts of CO 2 Emissions Limits on Electric Power Costs in the ERCOT Region May 12, 29 29 Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 1.
More informationPJM Manual 27: Open Access Transmission Tariff Accounting Revision: 88 Effective Date: November 16, 2017
PJM Manual 27: Open Access Transmission Tariff Accounting Revision: 88 Effective Date: November 16, 2017 Prepared by Market Settlements Development Department PJM 2017 Table of Contents Table of Contents
More informationLa regulación del incierto futuro de los sistemas eléctricos
La regulación del incierto futuro de los sistemas eléctricos Foro XM-2017 El futuro de la energía eléctrica en Colombia 25 de mayo, Cartagena, Colombia Carlos Batlle https://energy.mit.edu/profile/carlos-batlle
More informationcharges in the Texas (ERCOT) market Draft of December 29, 2012 Jay Zarnikau *,a,b, Dan Thal a Austin, TX 78746, USA The University of Texas at Austin,
The response of large industrial energy consumers to four coincident peak (4CP) transmission charges in the Texas (ERCOT) market Draft of December 29, 2012 Jay Zarnikau *,a,b, Dan Thal a a Frontier Associates
More informationDispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP)
Dispatch Signal & Locational Marginal Pricing (LMP) PJM State & Member Training Dept. Objectives Students will be able to: Identify how PJM dispatches & utilizes LMP Dispatch Rate Economic control signal
More informationthe Real-Time Market will be based on the system marginal costs produced by the Real-Time
17.1 LBMP Calculation The Locational Based Marginal Prices ( LBMPs or prices ) for Suppliers and Loads in the Real-Time Market will be based on the system marginal costs produced by the Real-Time Dispatch
More informationthe Real-Time Market will be based on the system marginal costs produced by the Real-Time
17.1 LBMP Calculation The Locational Based Marginal Prices ( LBMPs or prices ) for Suppliers and Loads in the Real-Time Market will be based on the system marginal costs produced by the Real-Time Dispatch
More informationALL ISLAND GRID STUDY STUDY OVERVIEW. January 2008
ALL ISLAND GRID STUDY STUDY OVERVIEW January 2008 1 Study Overview The All Island Grid Study is the first comprehensive assessment of the ability of the electrical power system and, as part of that, the
More informationCourse notes for EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing
Course notes for EE394V Restructured Electricity Markets: Locational Marginal Pricing Ross Baldick Copyright 2016 Ross Baldick www.ece.utexas.edu/~baldick/classes/394v/ee394v.html 1 7 Economic decision-making
More informationAdvancing Renewable Alternatives
Advancing Renewable Alternatives FERC/RTO Training Session Institute for Policy Integrity New York University School of Law June 15, 2011 Abigail Krich President, Boreas Renewables About Boreas Renewables
More informationPrice Formation. Eric Ciccoretti Attorney-Advisor Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June 13, 2017
Price Formation Eric Ciccoretti Attorney-Advisor Office of Energy Policy and Innovation Federal Energy Regulatory Commission June 13, 2017 The views and opinions presented are mine alone and do not reflect
More information2015 ISO/RTO Metrics Report. Summary. November 2015
2015 ISO/RTO Metrics Report Summary November 2015 ISO/RTO Metrics Report Background Independent system operators (ISOs) and regional transmission organizations (RTOs) that are regulated by the Federal
More informationCHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2016 SD Electricity Supply Resource Procurement Plan The 2016 South Dakota Electricity Supply Resource Procurement Plan ( Plan ) evaluates NorthWestern Energy s ( NorthWestern
More informationEnergy Uplift (Operating Reserves)
Section 4 Energy Uplift Energy Uplift (Operating Reserves) Energy uplift is paid to market participants under specified conditions in order to ensure that resources are not required to operate for the
More informationAlberta Energy - Capacity Market Framework Engagement December 2017
Capacity Market Cost Allocation - Response Template The engagement is seeking stakeholder feedback on the questions below. Please submit your responses to these questions, and any additional input on this
More informationPJM Manual 29: Billing. Revision: 26 Effective Date: 11/20/2014. Prepared by Market Settlements Department
PJM Manual 29: Billing Revision: 26 Effective Date: 11/20/2014 Prepared by Market Settlements Department PJM 2012 Table of Contents PJM Manual 29: Billing Table of Contents Table of Contents... ii Approval...
More informationCost-Benefit Analysis of the 2007 New Jersey Clean Energy Program Energy Efficiency Programs. Summary Report
Cost-Benefit Analysis of the 2007 New Jersey Clean Energy Program Energy Efficiency Programs Summary Report March 2010 Center for Energy, Economics & Environmental Policy Edward J. Bloustein School of
More informationNEW YORK INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR
Rate Schedule 1 Study Status Update Review of Other ISO/RTO s March 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 RATE STRUCTURES AT OTHER ISO S/RTO S...1 1.1 PJM...1 1.2 ISO-New England...3 1.3 California ISO...6 1.4 Midwest
More informationVariable Operations and Maintenance (VOM) Costs: Educational Document
Variable Operation & Maintenance Costs - Where we are today Manual 15 does not specifically define Variable Operation & Maintenance (VOM) Costs, nor do any other PJM manuals. In a Review of Generator Compensation
More informationPEAK DEMAND REDUCTION STRATEGY
ADVANCED ANERGY DVANCED E ECONOMY NERGY E ECONOMY the business voice of advanced energy PEAK DEMAND REDUCTION STRATEGY Prepared by Navigant Consulting Brett Feldman, Senior Research Analyst Matthew Tanner,
More informationRevealing the Value of Demand Response: Regulatory and Market Options
Revealing the Value of Demand Response: Regulatory and Market Options EPRI Demand Response Workshop October 29, 2003 Richard Cowart The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier,
More informationSB 838: Oregon Renewable Energy Act Establishing an Oregon Renewable Energy Standard
SB 838: Oregon Renewable Energy Act Establishing an Oregon Renewable Energy Standard Section-by-Section Summary SB 838, C-engrossed version As passed by Oregon House of Representatives, May 23 rd, 2007.
More informationColorado PUC E-Filings System
Page 1 of 13 ATTACHMENT A Introduction In Decision No. C16-0127 (issued on February 16, 2016), Public Service Company of Colorado ( Public Service or the Company ) was directed to file technical assumptions
More informationThe Cutting Edge in Resource Planning
The Cutting Edge in Resource Planning RETHINKING SYSTEM NEEDS AND IN A FUTURE DOMINATED BY RENEWABLES, NEW TECH, AND ENGAGED CONSUMERS PRESENTED TO Solar Energy Industries Association PRESENTED BY Kathleen
More informationDynamic Price, Product and Messaging Specification
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Retail Dynamic Price, Product and Messaging Specification (DRAFT) Draft Memo to by Ed Cazalet on Sept 7, 2009. During the August 2nd 2009, OASIS Energy Interoperation Technical Committee
More informationCapacity Performance Training. June 24, 2015
Capacity Performance Training June 24, 2015 Training Objectives Provide Capacity Market Sellers with information necessary to participate in the Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) under a Capacity Performance
More informationPhase 2 of 2015 General Rate Case Marginal Cost and Sales Forecast Proposals
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: A.14-06-XXX SCE-02 R. Thomas C. Silsbee C. Sorooshian S. Verdon (U 338-E) Phase 2 of 2015 General Rate Case Marginal Cost and Sales Forecast Proposals Before the
More informationSeminar on African Electrical Interconnection. Module 7 - Market Operational Structures
Seminar on African Electrical Interconnection Module 7 - Market Operational Structures Module 7 - Market Operational Structures Contents 1) Power Market Principles 2) Major Operational Issues 3) Transmission
More informationWabash Valley Power 2017 Integrated Resource Plan
Wabash Valley Power 2017 Integrated Resource Plan Executive Summary January 2018 Wabash Valley Power 722 North High School Road Indianapolis Indiana 46214 www.wvpa.com What is an Integrated Resource Plan
More informationISO Net Surplus Collection & Allocation in Wholesale Power Markets under LMP
ISO Net Surplus Collection & Allocation in Wholesale Power Markets under LMP Presenter: Leigh Tesfatsion Professor of Econ, Math, and Electrical and Comp. Engineering Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
More informationMarkets Report. Jennifer Warner-Freeman Senior Economist, Market Analysis January 22, PJM 2018
Markets Report Jennifer Warner-Freeman Senior Economist, Market Analysis January 22, 2018 www.pjm.com Executive Summary PJM Wholesale Cost for 2017 was $49.64/MWh, up from full-year 2016 costs of $47.49/MWh.
More information4 Calculation of Demand Curve Parameters
4 Calculation of Demand Curve Parameters This section addresses the demand curve for the Alberta capacity market, including the calculations for the components of the demand curve. 4.1 Resource adequacy
More informationNORTHWESTERN ENERGY 2018 ELECTRICITY RESOURCE PROCUREMENT PLAN STRAWMAN 1
NORTHWESTERN ENERGY 2018 ELECTRICITY RESOURCE PROCUREMENT PLAN CHAPTER 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STRAWMAN 1 1. Load Service Requirements a. Peaking Capacity (Planning Reserve Margin) b. Dispatchable Capacity
More informationOutline of Talk. Dynamic vs. Time-of-use pricing. Dynamic vs. Time-of-use pricing
Symmetric Treatment of Load and Generation: A Necessary Condition for Demand Response to Benefit Wholesale Market Efficiency and Manage Intermittency Frank A. Wolak Director, Program on Energy Sustainable
More informationDistributed Energy Resources
Distributed Energy Resources Future Market Options Sai Moorty ERCOT 1 North American Bulk Power Grids The ERCOT Region is one of 3 grid interconnections in USA-Canada The ERCOT grid: Covers 75% of Texas
More informationCommitted Offer: Offer on which a resource was scheduled by the Office of the Interconnection for a particular clock hour for the Operating Day.
Proposed Tariff Revisions Attachment K-Appendix and Schedule 1 of the Operating Agreement Generator Offer Flexibility Senior Task Force Revisions Related To Make-Whole and Lost Opportunity Cost Payments
More informationAPPENDIX H CALCULATING LOCATIONAL MARGINAL PRICE
2009 State of the Market Report for PJM CALCULATING LOCATIONAL MARGINAL PRICE H APPENDIX APPENDIX H CALCULATING LOCATIONAL MARGINAL PRICE In order to understand the relevance of various measures of locational
More informationSmart grids/smart rates : Why dynamic pricing is good for consumers and shouldn t scare regulators and policymakers
Smart grids/smart rates : Why dynamic pricing is good for consumers and shouldn t scare regulators and policymakers Bob Lieberman Illinois Commerce Commission April, 2008 My lawyer told me to say... My
More informationSERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 14-RA STANDBY SERVICE
Fourth Revised Leaf No. 135 Consolidated Edison Company Superseding Second Revised Leaf No. 135 (Third Revised Leaf No. 135 Canceled) Applicable to Use of Service for SERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 14-RA The
More informationElectricity market design with thoughts for New Zealand. Peter Cramton University of Cologne and University of Maryland 12 February 2018
Electricity market design with thoughts for New Zealand Peter Cramton University of Cologne and University of Maryland 12 February 2018 Goal of electricity markets: Reliable electricity at least cost Short-run
More informationDesign Considerations for an Alberta Capacity Market
Design Considerations for an Alberta Capacity Market Monitoring Analytics September 21, 2016 Monitoring Analytics 2016 www.monitoringanalytics.com This page intentionally left blank. Monitoring Analytics
More informationPJM Manual 29: Billing Revision: 28 Effective Date: April 1, Prepared by Market Settlements Department
PJM Manual 29: Billing Revision: 28 Effective Date: April 1, 2018 Prepared by Market Settlements Department PJM 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents Approval...3 Current Revision...4 Introduction...
More informationPREPARED FOR: ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE Updated Solar PV Value Report
PREPARED FOR: ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE 2013 Updated Solar PV Value Report MAY 2013 2013 Updated Solar PV Value Report Arizona Public Service May 10, 2013 This report has been prepared for the use of the
More informationEntergy New Orleans, Inc.
. Entergy New Orleans, Inc. An Integrated Resource Plan (2009 2028) Scope and Structure This document describes Entergy New Orleans, Inc. s ( ENOI ) long-term integrated resource plan ( IRP ) 1 for the
More informationVirtual Workshop on PJM ARR and FTR Market 2017/2018
Virtual Workshop on PJM ARR and FTR Market 2017/2018 PJM State & Member Training Dept. Webex February 10, 2017 PJM 2017 Disclaimer: PJM has made all efforts possible to accurately document all information
More informationGame-Based Simulation of Gas-Fired Generation Mix With High Renewable Energy Shares
Game-Based Simulation of Gas-Fired Generation Mix With High Renewable Energy Shares Mark Thurber Associate Director, Program on Energy and Sustainable Development Stanford University NGI Annual Affiliates
More informationNew England States Committee on Electricity
Renewable and Clean Mechanisms 2.0 Study Phase I: Scenario Analysis Winter 2017 New England States Committee on Electricity Overview Context Analytical Approach and Modeling Assumptions Scenario Analysis
More informationPJM Manual 29: Billing Revision: 28 Effective Date: April 1, Prepared by Market Settlements Department
PJM Manual 29: Billing Revision: 28 Effective Date: April 1, 2018 Prepared by Market Settlements Department PJM 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents Approval...3 Current Revision...4 Introduction...
More informationPhase 2 of 2009 General Rate Case Marginal Cost And Sales Forecast Proposals
Application No.: Exhibit No.: Witnesses: A.08-03- SCE-02 Cyrus Sorooshian Steve Verdon Paul Nelson Carl Silsbee (U 338-E) Phase 2 of 2009 General Rate Case Marginal Cost And Sales Forecast Proposals Before
More informationAdvancing Past Baseload to a Flexible Grid
Briefing for Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee Advancing Past Baseload to a Flexible Grid How Grid Planners and Power Markets Are Better Defining System Needs to Achieve a Cost-Effective and
More informationMarginal Price Assumptions For Estimating Customer Benefits of Air Conditioner Efficiency Standards:
Marginal Price Assumptions For Estimating Customer Benefits of Air Conditioner Efficiency Standards: Comments on the Department of Energy s Proposed Rules for Central Air Conditioners and Heat Pump Energy
More informationESD 126. ESD 126 Economic Markets for Power
Economic Markets for Power Characteristics of Electric Demand Electricity Demand in Hokkaido FY '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '02 '07 '12 11.7 16.3 17.6 20.5 24.4 29.2 31.5 33.9 %1 48 46 39 33 29 28 27 26 %2 52
More informationRate Design and Resource Planning
Rate Design and Resource Planning Rate Considerations and Resource Planning Decisions El Paso Electric Company New Mexico Public Advisory Group Meeting December 11, 2014 Rates and Resource Planning The
More informationPublic Utility Regulatory Policy Act Standards
Document Type: EA Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Document Project Name: PURPA Standards Project Number: 2007-4 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Public Utility
More informationFederal Energy Regulatory Commission Working Paper on Standardized Transmission Service and Wholesale Electric Market Design
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Working Paper on Standardized Transmission Service and Wholesale Electric Market Design To enhance competition in wholesale electric markets and broaden the benefits
More information