Case No COMP/M AVNET/ BELL MICRO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 02/07/2010

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case No COMP/M AVNET/ BELL MICRO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 02/07/2010"

Transcription

1 EN Case No COMP/M AVNET/ BELL MICRO Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 02/07/2010 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32010M5864 Office for Publications of the European Union L-2985 Luxembourg

2 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus [ ]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. SG-Greffe(2010) D/9922 C(2010) 4729 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION To the notifying party: Dear Sir/Madam, Subject: Case No COMP/M.5864 Avnet/ Bell Micro Notification of 28/05/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/ On 28/05/2010, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertaking Avnet Inc. ('Avnet', USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the undertaking Bell Micro Products ('Bell Micro', USA) by way of purchase of shares. I. THE PARTIES 2. Avnet is a US-based distributor of electronic components, computer products and technology services operating worldwide. Through Electronics Marketing ('EM'), Avnet distributes a wide range of electronic components (semiconductors, interconnect devices, etc.) to contract manufacturers ('CMs') and original equipment manufacturers ('OEMs'). Through Technology Solutions ('TS'), Avnet supplies products, services and solutions for value-added resellers ('VARs'), system builders or integrators, OEMs and end-user businesses. 1 OJ L 24, , p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision. Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles / Europese Commissie, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium. Telephone: (32-2)

3 3. Bell Micro is a US-based distributor of data storage and server products and solutions, computer components, software applications, peripherals, as well as a provider of a wide range of services including system configuration, product installation, post-sale service and support and supply chain management. Bell Micro serves OEMs, commercial resellers, VARs, system integrators ('SIs'), CMs, storage, and server and networking infrastructure, end user customers and major retailers. II. THE OPERATION 4. Pursuant to a Merger Agreement dated 28 March 2010, Avnet will acquire the entire issued and to be issued share capital of Bell Micro through a merger between Bell Micro and AVT Acquisition Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Avnet. Bell Micro will survive the merger and become a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of Avnet. 5. The proposed operation therefore constitutes a concentration within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation. III. EU DIMENSION 6. The undertakings concerned have a combined aggregate worldwide turnover of more than EUR million (Avnet: EUR million; Bell Micro: EUR million) 2. Each of them has an EU-wide turnover in excess of EUR 250 million (Avnet: EUR [ ]; Bell Micro: EUR [ ]), but they do not achieve more than two-thirds of their aggregate EU-wide turnover within one and the same Member State. The proposed operation therefore has an EU dimension. IV. ASSESSMENT A. INTRODUCTION 7. The proposed operation concerns the distribution of IT products and related services (referred to in the rest of this decision as 'IT products'). IT products are sold through two main channels: direct sales by the IT manufacturers ('vendors') and indirect sales ('distribution') by numerous intermediaries (value-added distributors ('VADs'), value-added resellers ('VARs'), system integrators ('SIs')). 8. The chart below illustrates the sales channels of IT products and the relationships between these different actors 3. 2 Turnover calculated in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Merger Regulation. 3 See Case COMP/M Avnet/Horizon Technology, 26 June 2008, paragraph 9. 2

4 VENDORS VALUE ADDED DISTRIBUTORS (VADs) VALUE ADDED RESELLERS (VARs) SYSTEM INTEGRATORS (SIs) END CUSTOMERS 9. Vendors are IT manufacturers, such as IBM or HP, which develop hardware or software solutions. They can sell either directly to end customers (direct sales, by bypassing distributors and supplying large corporate accounts) or VARs or through the intermediate channel constituted by VADs (indirect sales). 10. VADs are partnered with vendors and sell predominantly to reseller partners (VARs, SIs) and only exceptionally to end-customers. According to the notifying party, the role of VADs is to put together and sell cross-vendor solutions which range from standard products to much higher levels of customisation, configuration and integration. Their technical expertise aims at supporting VARs or end-customers directly on behalf of the reseller. 11. The main factor differentiating VADs from vendors is VADs' ability to provide a one-stopshop facility to their customers. Indeed, VADs provide a broad range of products. They also provide added-value services such as system configuration, product installation, logistic services, financing, consulting, and support. VADs normally have to be certified by a vendor in order to distribute that vendor's IT products. 12. VARs, and to a certain extent SIs 4, are typically partnered with VADs and/or with vendors directly. They sell to end-customers or to smaller VARs. According to the notifying party, the role of VARs is to put together technical solutions for end-customers, install and support. 13. According to the notifying party, although VADs and VARs both sell hardware and services, they do so in varying proportions and importance. The notifying party considers that the qualification of VAD or VAR depends on the proportion that hardware and services represent in their activity. For some companies, the qualification as a VAD or a VAR varies from one year to another. 4 Some larger SIs only offer services ('pure SIs'), in which case they will then rely on VADs, VARs or vendors to supply the IT products. All other SIs act as VARs, which offer both products and services. 3

5 14. The Commission considers therefore that the distinction between VADs and VARs is blurred. However, this fact has no consequence for the purpose of the assessment of the proposed operation. 15. Both Avnet and Bell Micro are active as VADs. B. MARKET DEFINITION 1. Product market (i) Indirect v. direct sales 16. The notifying party submits that direct sales of IT products and indirect sales of IT products ('distribution of IT products') are distinct markets, although the two sales channels exert to some extent competitive constraints on each other. 17. In previous decisions 5, the Commission has left open whether direct and indirect sales belong to the same product market. In TechData/Scribona 6, the Commission found that prices in the indirect sales channel are significantly constrained by prices in the direct sales channel. However, in Arrow Electronics/Logix 7, the Commission found that the direct and indirect sales channels were not fully interchangeable for resellers and retailers active in Denmark. 18. The Commission's market investigation in the present case does not fully support the existence of an overall market for the sale of IT products including both direct sales by vendors and indirect sales through VADs, although half of the respondents consider that prices in the distribution of IT products are significantly constrained by prices and other conditions of supply in the direct sales channel 8. Some respondents also indicated that VADs' customers can and do purchase both directly from vendors and indirectly through a distributor. Vendors use VADs to increase market reach and coverage, for their logistics services (such as stocking of products) and their provision of credit and related facilities as well as technical support to VARs. The purchase of IT products through VADs offer their VAR customers advantages in terms of broader range of IT products, better logistics and shorter delivery time, financing services, assistance with integration and marketing. (ii) All IT products v. IT products categories 19. The notifying party submits that the distribution of IT products is the relevant product market and that this market should not be further segmented by IT products categories. 5 Case COMP/M Tech Data/Scribona, 28 April 2008, paragraph 19; Case COMP/M Arrow Electronics/Logix, 19 May 2008, paragraph 17; Case COMP/M Avnet/Horizon Technology, 26 June 2008, paragraph COMP/M Tech Data/ Scribona, 28 April 2008, paragraph COMP/M Arrow Electronics/ Logix, 19 May 2008, paragraph out of 19 respondents. 4

6 20. In previous decisions 9, the Commission has considered that conditions of supply in the indirect sales channel are globally homogeneous across all categories of IT products, although some distributors specialise in certain categories of products (such as storage capacity and servers). 21. The Commission however left open in those cases whether the relevant market should include all IT products or whether distinct markets should be defined on the basis of each IT product category (including a sub-segmentation according to the servers range). 22. In the present case, the overlap between the activities of Avnet and Bell Micro concerns mainly the distribution of servers and storage products. 23. Servers include industry standard servers and servers with proprietary processor technology using Unix or Linux operating systems. The Commission has in the past further segmented servers into low-end servers, medium-range servers and high-end servers 10 based on price band classification used by industry analysts such as IDC. 24. Storage products include disk storage and tape storage systems, as well as hard disk drives (HDDs) 11. They are used to support the processing, management, and storage of digital data. 25. The Commission's market investigation in the present case has confirmed that VADs need specific skills and that they have to obtain specific certification from vendors in order to distribute different IT products, including entry-level, mid range and high end servers 12. Distributors tend to specialise in specific product ranges, although some respondents indicate that these skills appear transposable through training (maybe less so for higher end products such as high end servers, storage products or networking products). Conclusion 26. For the purpose of the present case, the exact product market definition can be left open, since under all alternative product market definitions the proposed operation does not give rise to serious doubts as regards its compatibility with the internal market. 9 COMP/M Avnet/Horizon Technology, 26 June 2008, paragraph 14; COMP/M.5099 Arrow Electronix/Logix, 19 May 2008, paragraph 19; COMP/M.5091 Tech Data/Scribona, 28 April 2008, paragraph COMP/M.5162 Avnet/Horizon Technology, 26 June 2008, paragraph 13, COMP/M.2223 Getronics/Hagemeyer/JV, 2 April 2001, paragraphs 14 to IDC defines "Enterprise Storage Systems" as a set of storage elements, including controllers, cables, and (in some instances) a host bus adapter associated with three or more mass storage devices (hard disk drives or solid state drives). IDC Report, Worldwide Enterprise Storage Systems Forecast: Economic Crisis Driving Quest for Storage Efficiency and Emerging Architectures out of 13 respondents consider that VADs need specific skills in order to distribute different IT products. A similar ratio (10 out of 13) considers that VADs need specific skills in order to distribute each of entry-level, mid range and high end servers. 5

7 2. Geographic market 27. The notifying party submits that although the distribution of IT products has historically been national in focus, distribution is increasingly carried out beyond the national scope. The notifying party submits that the relevant geographic markets are regional. It has distinguished between the following geographic markets: (i) the Nordic countries (Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland); (ii) the Benelux; (iii) Austria, Germany and the German-speaking part of Switzerland; and (iv) United Kingdom and Ireland. 28. In previous decisions 13, the Commission has considered that language and local presence constituted indications that the market for the distribution of IT products could still be national in scope without concluding on its relevant dimension (national, regional or EEAwide). 29. The Commission's market investigation in the present case has indicated that a majority of the respondents considers that the market for the distribution of IT products is EEA-wide 14. Most of the respondents consider also that a local presence (i.e. logistics at a national level) is not a key requirement for a VAD to exercise its activity 15, although most VADs do appear to have a local presence. Their respective sales organisations reflect different commercial strategies as the two following quotes from the Commission's market investigation illustrate. One VAD indicated that "[it] generally treat[s] each individual country differently as there are different drivers in each individual country". By contrast, another VAD indicated that "[it] is structured regionally from an internal organisational point of view but this is not a result of a need for country-specific insight." 30. For the purpose of the present case, the exact geographic market definition can be left open as the proposed transaction does not raise competition concerns under any possible definition of the geographic market. C. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT 31. Avnet and Bell Micro are both active in several EEA countries as VADs for a range of IT products. The proposed operation only leads to affected markets if narrow market definitions are retained, namely the distribution of storage products and servers at a regional or national level. 32. On an overall market for the sale of all IT products (comprising both direct and indirect sales), the parties' combined market shares 16 would be very limited at an EEA level: [0-5]% 13 COMP/M Avnet/Horizon Technology, 26 June 2008, paragraph 17; COMP/M.5099 Arrow Electronix/Logix, 19 May 2008, paragraph 24; COMP/M.5091 Tech Data/Scribona, 28 April 2008, paragraph out of 19 respondents consider that the geographic scope of the distribution of IT products is EEAwide out of 19 respondents consider that a local presence is not a requirement for the distribution of IT products. 16 The notifying party has provided market shares on the basis of two IDC reports: IDC Report, November 2009, and the IDC Report dated April 2006, entitled "An Overview of IT Distribution in Western Europe Country Channel Development Forecasts 2005/2010". The data contained in this second report have been adjusted to take into account the overall market size decrease in server sales in

8 (Avnet) and [0-5]% (Bell Micro). The impact of the proposed operation on such a market would be insignificant. 33. This conclusion remains unchanged at the regional or national level, as the assessment below as regards narrower product markets demonstrates. 34. On a market for distribution of all IT products, the merged entity's combined market share remains below [0-5]% at the EEA level, [0-5]% at the regional level, and [5-10]% at the national level. 35. Given these very limited market shares and the existence of numerous significant competitors, such as Arrow, Tech Data and the ALSO group, the proposed operation will not have any effect on the market for the distribution of all IT products in the EEA. 36. On narrower markets for the distribution of specific categories of IT products at the regional level, the merged entity's combined market share does not exceed 15%, except for the following markets: Region IT product and service category Avnet Bell Micro Combined market share Benelux Storage products [0-5]% [30-40]% [30-40]% Austria, Mid range servers [20-30]% [0-5]% [20-30]% Germany, Switzerland Storage products [10-20]% [10-20]% [20-30]% Servers [10-20]% [10-20]% [20-30]% UK, Ireland Mid range servers [20-30]% [5-10]% [30-40]% Entry level servers [0-5]% [10-20]% [20-30]% Storage products [5-10]% [10-20]% [20-30]% 37. For those regional markets where the merged entity's combined market share is above 15%, the Commission considers that there are no competition problems for the reasons outlined at paragraphs below. 38. At the national level, the parties' activities in the distribution of IT products overlap in the thirteen EEA countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovak Republic, Spain and the UK. However, in four of them (namely the Czech Republic, Poland, Romania and Slovak Republic), Bell Micro's sales of IT products remain marginal even though it has been present on these markets for a number of years 17. Accordingly, the proposed operation will not change the structure of competition in these countries. 17 Bell Micro started its activities in Poland and the Slovak Republic in November 2001, in the Czech Republic in October 2002, and in Hungary in June

9 39. On a market for the distribution of specific categories of IT products and services at the national level other than those four countries where Bell Micro's sales are marginal, the merged entity's combined market share do not exceed 15%, except for the following markets: Member State IT product category Avnet Bell Micro Combined market share Austria Storage products [10-20]% [5-10]% [20-30]% Germany Storage products [10-20]% [10-20]% [20-30]% Hungary Storage products [20-30]% [0-5]% [20-30]% Ireland Storage products [0-5]% [10-20]% [10-20]% the Netherlands Storage products [5-10]% [40-50]% [50-60]% Servers [10-20]% [10-20]% [30-40]% UK Mid range servers [30-40]% [10-20]% [40-50]% Entry level servers [5-10]% [20-30]% [20-30]% Storage products [10-20]% [10-20]% [20-30]% 40. Despite the merged entity's high combined market shares in the distribution of storage products in the Netherlands ([50-60]%) and in the distribution of mid range servers in the UK ([40-50]%), and the relatively high market shares on certain regional markets (see paragraph 36 above) the proposed operation will not lead to any anticompetitive effects due to the characteristics of these markets. 41. First, the Commission's market investigation confirms that the distribution of IT products in these EEA countries and regions is highly competitive with a significant number of distributors competing to supply VARs, SIs and other large accounts. The merged entity will continue to face competition from numerous other VADs. These include generally companies with a pan-european footprint such as Tech Data, Ingram Micro and Arrow, as well as important companies with a more regional or national focus. 42. On the market for the distribution of storage products in the Netherlands, the main competitors of the parties are Ingram Micro (15%-20%), Copaco (10%-15%), ETC (5%- 10%), Magirus (5%-10%) and Tech Data (5%-10%). 43. On the market for the distribution of mid range servers in the UK, the main competitors of the parties are SCH Group (ETC and ISI) (10%-20%), Arrow (10%-20%), Tech Data (10%-20%) and Westcoast (5%-10%). 44. As regards the affected markets (national and regional) indicated above, all respondents to the Commission's market investigation with one exception consider that the distribution of servers and storage products are characterised by substantial intra-brand and inter-brand competition. None of the vendors and clients (VARs, SIs) that replied to the Commission's market investigation expects this proposed operation to have anticompetitive effects on the 8

10 distribution of servers, as well as on the distribution of storage products in the EEA, in regions within the EEA and in the EEA countries. 45. Second, vendors exert an important competitive constraint on VADs. The Commission's market investigation has confirmed that vendors have contractual relationships with multiple partners in every country, so as to grant VARs, SIs and large accounts a choice of VADs. Contracts between vendors and VADs can be terminated for no cause with a notice period (generally [ ] days) and at little cost. Vendors do change their distribution arrangements terminating their relationship with some distributors and appointing new ones. Vendors also exert some control over the conditions and price at which distributors can resell their IT products. 46. Third, the Commission's market investigation has confirmed the notifying party's claim that VARs themselves also exert constraints on VADs as VARs can turn directly to vendors if VADs increase their prices, in particular for major VARs (sometimes referred to as 'Tier-1 VARs'). Most VARs indicate that they consider themselves as competitors of certain distributors (4 out of 5 respondents). All of them have switched suppliers (from one distributor to another distributor or from a distributor to a vendor) over the past 3 years. Only one respondent indicated that it cannot turn directly to vendors in case of prices increases. 47. Fourth, the Commission's market investigation has suggested that barriers to entry and expansion in the distribution of specific IT products are relatively low. VADs that replied to the market investigation indicated that they generally would be able to meet an increase in demand for servers and data storage products in the event of a price increase by the merged entity. Existing VADs can also relatively easily extend their product range and would obtain support from vendors to do so. The only potential barrier to entry for a VAD is the need to obtain vendor licences to distribute products within a particular geographic area. As indicated by a respondent, "to the extent that a distributor does seek to obtain licences, this barrier is not significant, as vendors have an interest in maintaining as broad a range of routes to market as possible. Accordingly, they will contract with a number of distributors in any given geographic area and readily change distribution arrangements where they believe one of their existing partners is underperforming". This point has been largely confirmed by the vendors that replied to the market investigation: the great majority of the vendors who replied to the Commission's market investigation explicitly stated that they would appoint additional VADs/VARs if the merged entity increases the prices at which it sells their products 48. The notifying party has provided a list of recent entrants in the markets concerned in the period from 2007 to 2010, such as Arrow, Ingram and Hammer in the UK, Distrilogie, Green Data and Hammer in the Netherlands, Green Data in Germany and Arrow in Austria. Accordingly, the Commission considers that there are relatively low barriers to entry in these markets. 49. In view of all the above, it can therefore be concluded that the proposed operation does not give rise to serious doubts as to compatibility with the internal market on any of the alternative markets for the distribution of IT products. 9

11 VI. CONCLUSION 50. For the above reasons, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation. For the European Commission, (signed) Joaquín ALMUNIA Vice-President of the European Commission 10

Case No COMP/M CORPORATION / AZLAN GROUP. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/03/2003

Case No COMP/M CORPORATION / AZLAN GROUP. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/03/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3107 - TECH DATA CORPORATION / AZLAN GROUP Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/03/2003

More information

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32017M8248

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32017M8248 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.8248 - TECH DATA / AVNET'S TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b)

More information

Case No COMP/M RICOH / IKON. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/10/2008

Case No COMP/M RICOH / IKON. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/10/2008 EN Case No COMP/M.5334 - RICOH / IKON Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/10/2008 In electronic form on

More information

Case M AVNET / PREMIER FARNELL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/10/2016

Case M AVNET / PREMIER FARNELL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/10/2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.8183 - AVNET / PREMIER FARNELL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

More information

COMP/M TRITON III HOLDING 6/ WITTUR GROUP

COMP/M TRITON III HOLDING 6/ WITTUR GROUP EN Case No COMP/M.5991 - TRITON III HOLDING 6/ WITTUR GROUP Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 02/12/2010

More information

Case No COMP/M BOEING / AVIALL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/08/2006

Case No COMP/M BOEING / AVIALL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/08/2006 EN Case No COMP/M.4241 - BOEING / AVIALL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/08/2006 In electronic form

More information

Case No COMP/M RICOH / DANKA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/12/2006

Case No COMP/M RICOH / DANKA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/12/2006 EN Case No COMP/M.4434 - RICOH / DANKA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/12/2006 In electronic form

More information

Case No COMP/M TNT FORWARDING HOLDING / WILSON LOGISTICS. REGULATION (EEC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M TNT FORWARDING HOLDING / WILSON LOGISTICS. REGULATION (EEC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.3496 - TNT FORWARDING HOLDING / WILSON LOGISTICS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 02/08/2004

More information

COMP/M STORA ENSO / SCHNEIDERSÖHNE PAPIER

COMP/M STORA ENSO / SCHNEIDERSÖHNE PAPIER EN Case No COMP/M.3822 - STORA ENSO / SCHNEIDERSÖHNE PAPIER Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2005

More information

Case No COMP/M UPS / Menlo. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2004

Case No COMP/M UPS / Menlo. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2004 EN Case No COMP/M.3603 - UPS / Menlo Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2004 In electronic form on

More information

Case No COMP/M SHELL / BEB. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/11/2003

Case No COMP/M SHELL / BEB. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/11/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3293 - SHELL / BEB Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/11/2003 Also available in the

More information

Case No COMP/M GOLDMAN SACHS / CINVEN / AHLSELL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/01/2006

Case No COMP/M GOLDMAN SACHS / CINVEN / AHLSELL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/01/2006 EN Case No COMP/M.4050 - GOLDMAN SACHS / CINVEN / AHLSELL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/01/2006

More information

Case No COMP/M FAURECIA/ PLASTAL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/03/2010

Case No COMP/M FAURECIA/ PLASTAL. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/03/2010 EN Case No COMP/M.5799 - FAURECIA/ PLASTAL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/03/2010 In electronic form

More information

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC / MGE - UPS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 05/02/2004

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC / MGE - UPS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 05/02/2004 EN Case No COMP/M.3347 - SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC / MGE - UPS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 05/02/2004 Also

More information

Case No COMP/M NTN / SNR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/03/2007

Case No COMP/M NTN / SNR. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/03/2007 EN Case No COMP/M.4346 - NTN / SNR Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/03/2007 In electronic form on the

More information

Case No COMP/M INEOS / LANXESS' ENGINEERING THERMOPLASTIC RESINS BUSINESS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M INEOS / LANXESS' ENGINEERING THERMOPLASTIC RESINS BUSINESS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.4682 - INEOS / LANXESS' ENGINEERING THERMOPLASTIC RESINS BUSINESS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION

More information

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC/ INVENSYS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/11/2013

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC/ INVENSYS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/11/2013 EN Case No COMP/M.7005 - SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC/ INVENSYS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/11/2013 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M BAIN CAPITAL / DOR CHEMICAL / TRESPAPHAN. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M BAIN CAPITAL / DOR CHEMICAL / TRESPAPHAN. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.3025 - BAIN CAPITAL / DOR CHEMICAL / TRESPAPHAN Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 17/12/2002

More information

Case No COMP/M MERCK/ MILLIPORE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/07/2010

Case No COMP/M MERCK/ MILLIPORE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/07/2010 EN Case No COMP/M.5863 - MERCK/ MILLIPORE Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/07/2010 In electronic form

More information

Case M PGA / MSA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32015M7747

Case M PGA / MSA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32015M7747 EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.7747 - PGA / MSA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/10/2015

More information

Case No COMP/M JOHN WOOD GROUP/ SIEMENS/ JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/04/2014

Case No COMP/M JOHN WOOD GROUP/ SIEMENS/ JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/04/2014 EN Case No COMP/M.7083 - JOHN WOOD GROUP/ SIEMENS/ JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/04/2014 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M MEXICHEM/ VESTOLIT

Case No COMP/M MEXICHEM/ VESTOLIT EN Case No COMP/M.7395 - MEXICHEM/ VESTOLIT Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 13/11/2014 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M TPG ADVISORS III / GOLDMAN SACHS / BAIN CAPITAL INVESTORS / BURGER KING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M TPG ADVISORS III / GOLDMAN SACHS / BAIN CAPITAL INVESTORS / BURGER KING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.2940 - TPG ADVISORS III / GOLDMAN SACHS / BAIN CAPITAL INVESTORS / BURGER KING Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b)

More information

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32017M8640

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32017M8640 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.8640 - CVC / BLACKSTONE / PAYSAFE Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION

More information

Case No COMP/M CVC / BOCCHI / DE WEIDE BLIK. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/05/2006

Case No COMP/M CVC / BOCCHI / DE WEIDE BLIK. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/05/2006 EN Case No COMP/M.4216 - CVC / BOCCHI / DE WEIDE BLIK Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/05/2006 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M LUFTHANSA CARGO / AIR FRANCE FINANCE / BRITISH AIRWAYS / GLOBAL FREIGHT EXCHANGE / JV

Case No COMP/M LUFTHANSA CARGO / AIR FRANCE FINANCE / BRITISH AIRWAYS / GLOBAL FREIGHT EXCHANGE / JV EN Case No COMP/M.2830 - LUFTHANSA CARGO / AIR FRANCE FINANCE / BRITISH AIRWAYS / GLOBAL FREIGHT EXCHANGE / JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

More information

Case No COMP/M EDP / HIDROELECTRICA DEL CANTABRICO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M EDP / HIDROELECTRICA DEL CANTABRICO. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.3448 - EDP / HIDROELECTRICA DEL CANTABRICO Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 09/09/2004

More information

Case No COMP/M IBM / ILOG. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/11/2008

Case No COMP/M IBM / ILOG. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/11/2008 EN Case No COMP/M.5317 - IBM / ILOG Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/11/2008 In electronic form on

More information

Case No M MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES / SIEMENS / METAL TECHNOLOGIES JV

Case No M MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES / SIEMENS / METAL TECHNOLOGIES JV EN Case No M.7330 - MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES / SIEMENS / METAL TECHNOLOGIES JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION

More information

Case No COMP/M PAI / CHR. HANSEN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/07/2005

Case No COMP/M PAI / CHR. HANSEN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/07/2005 EN Case No COMP/M.3845 - PAI / CHR. HANSEN Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/07/2005 In electronic form

More information

Case No COMP/M PAI PARTNERS/ INDUSTRIAL PARTS HOLDING

Case No COMP/M PAI PARTNERS/ INDUSTRIAL PARTS HOLDING EN Case No COMP/M.6808 - PAI PARTNERS/ INDUSTRIAL PARTS HOLDING Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/02/2013

More information

Case No COMP/M HEWLETT-PACKARD/ 3COM. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/02/2010

Case No COMP/M HEWLETT-PACKARD/ 3COM. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/02/2010 EN Case No COMP/M.5732 - HEWLETT-PACKARD/ 3COM Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/02/2010 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M E.ON / MIDLANDS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/12/2003

Case No COMP/M E.ON / MIDLANDS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/12/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3306 - E.ON / MIDLANDS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/12/2003 Also available in

More information

Case No COMP/M MUBADALA / ROLLS ROYCE / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/02/2009

Case No COMP/M MUBADALA / ROLLS ROYCE / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/02/2009 EN Case No COMP/M.5399 - MUBADALA / ROLLS ROYCE / JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 16/02/2009 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION / BUSINESS SYSTEMS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION / BUSINESS SYSTEMS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.3171 - COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION / ROYAL MAIL BUSINESS SYSTEMS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION

More information

Case No COMP/M SONAE INDUSTRIA / TARKETT / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/06/2006

Case No COMP/M SONAE INDUSTRIA / TARKETT / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/06/2006 EN Case No COMP/M.4048 - SONAE INDUSTRIA / TARKETT / JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/06/2006 In

More information

COMP/M BP / ASSOCIATED BRITISH FOODS / JV

COMP/M BP / ASSOCIATED BRITISH FOODS / JV EN Case No COMP/M.4798 - BP / ASSOCIATED BRITISH FOODS / JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/08/2007

More information

Case No COMP/M ORACLE / BEA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/2008

Case No COMP/M ORACLE / BEA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/2008 EN Case No COMP/M.5080 - ORACLE / BEA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/2008 In electronic form on

More information

Case No COMP/M AVNET / ABACUS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/01/2009

Case No COMP/M AVNET / ABACUS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/01/2009 EN Case No COMP/M.5385 - AVNET / ABACUS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/01/2009 In electronic form

More information

&DVH 1R,90 %8+50$11 &25325$7( (;35(66 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/09/1999

&DVH 1R,90 %8+50$11 &25325$7( (;35(66 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/09/1999 EN &DVH 1R,90 %8+50$11 &25325$7( (;35(66 Only the English text is available and authentic. 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/09/1999 $OVRDYDLODEOHLQWKH&(/(;GDWDEDVH

More information

Case No COMP/M SMITH & NEPHEW / CENTERPULSE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/05/2003

Case No COMP/M SMITH & NEPHEW / CENTERPULSE. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/05/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3146 - SMITH & NEPHEW / CENTERPULSE Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/05/2003 Also

More information

Case No COMP/M ADM / PURA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/04/2003

Case No COMP/M ADM / PURA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/04/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3044 - ADM / PURA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/04/2003 Also available in the

More information

Case No COMP/M ATOS ORIGIN / BANKSYS / BCC. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/09/2006

Case No COMP/M ATOS ORIGIN / BANKSYS / BCC. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/09/2006 EN Case No COMP/M.4316 - ATOS ORIGIN / BANKSYS / BCC Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/09/2006 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/JV.45 - * BERTELSMANN / KOOPERATIVA FÖRBUNDET / BOL NORDIC. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/JV.45 - * BERTELSMANN / KOOPERATIVA FÖRBUNDET / BOL NORDIC. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/JV.45 - * BERTELSMANN / KOOPERATIVA FÖRBUNDET / BOL NORDIC Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION

More information

Case No IV/M CHS / VOBIS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 21/08/1998

Case No IV/M CHS / VOBIS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 21/08/1998 EN Case No IV/M.1265 - CHS / VOBIS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 21/08/1998 Also available in the CELEX

More information

Case No COMP/M MARFRIG ALIMENTOS/ SEARA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/12/2009

Case No COMP/M MARFRIG ALIMENTOS/ SEARA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/12/2009 EN Case No COMP/M.5705 - MARFRIG ALIMENTOS/ SEARA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/12/2009 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M ERAMET / TINFOS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/07/2008

Case No COMP/M ERAMET / TINFOS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/07/2008 EN Case No COMP/M.5179 - ERAMET / TINFOS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/07/2008 In electronic form

More information

Case No COMP/M.6191 Birla/ Columbian Chemicals

Case No COMP/M.6191 Birla/ Columbian Chemicals EN Case No COMP/M.6191 Birla/ Columbian Chemicals Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 22(3) Date: 08/04/2011 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

More information

Case No COMP/M WPP / CORDIANT. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2003

Case No COMP/M WPP / CORDIANT. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3209 - WPP / CORDIANT Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2003 Also available in

More information

COMP/M SITA SVERIGE AB / SYDKRAFT ECOPLUS

COMP/M SITA SVERIGE AB / SYDKRAFT ECOPLUS EN Case No COMP/M.2897 - SITA SVERIGE AB / SYDKRAFT ECOPLUS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 14/10/2002

More information

Case No COMP/M SAINT GOBAIN / DAHL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 28/04/2004

Case No COMP/M SAINT GOBAIN / DAHL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 28/04/2004 EN Case No COMP/M.3407 - SAINT GOBAIN / DAHL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 28/04/2004 Also available

More information

Case No COMP/M CVC / DSI. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/09/2007

Case No COMP/M CVC / DSI. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/09/2007 EN Case No COMP/M.4850 - CVC / DSI Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/09/2007 In electronic form on the

More information

Case No COMP/M ASTRIUM HOLDING/ VIZADA GROUP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/11/2011

Case No COMP/M ASTRIUM HOLDING/ VIZADA GROUP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/11/2011 EN Case No COMP/M.6393 - ASTRIUM HOLDING/ VIZADA GROUP Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/11/2011 In

More information

Case No COMP/M SMITHFIELD / OAKTREE / SARA LEE FOODS EUROPE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M SMITHFIELD / OAKTREE / SARA LEE FOODS EUROPE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.4257 - SMITHFIELD / OAKTREE / SARA LEE FOODS EUROPE Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

More information

Case No COMP/M ALCAN / FLEXPACK. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/02/2003

Case No COMP/M ALCAN / FLEXPACK. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/02/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3049 - ALCAN / FLEXPACK Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/02/2003 Also available in

More information

Case No COMP/M SONEPAR / HAGEMEYER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/02/2008

Case No COMP/M SONEPAR / HAGEMEYER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/02/2008 EN Case No COMP/M.4949 - SONEPAR / HAGEMEYER Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 08/02/2008 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M SAAB / WM-DATA AB / SAAB CARAN JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/12/2001

Case No COMP/M SAAB / WM-DATA AB / SAAB CARAN JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/12/2001 EN Case No COMP/M.2645 - SAAB / WM-DATA AB / SAAB CARAN JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 06/12/2001

More information

Case No COMP/M G SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III/ BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY/ H J HEINZ COMPANY. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M G SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III/ BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY/ H J HEINZ COMPANY. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.6895-3G SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND III/ BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY/ H J HEINZ COMPANY Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b)

More information

Case No COMP/M GS/ TPG/ ONTEX. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/09/2010

Case No COMP/M GS/ TPG/ ONTEX. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/09/2010 EN Case No COMP/M.5958 - GS/ TPG/ ONTEX Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/09/2010 In electronic form

More information

Case No COMP/M S&B / HALLIBURTON / CEBO JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/2007

Case No COMP/M S&B / HALLIBURTON / CEBO JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/2007 EN Case No COMP/M.4562 - S&B / HALLIBURTON / CEBO JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 18/04/2007 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M BUNGE / CEREOL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/09/2002

Case No COMP/M BUNGE / CEREOL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/09/2002 EN Case No COMP/M.2886 - BUNGE / CEREOL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/09/2002 Also available in

More information

Case No COMP/M EDF / SEEBOARD. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2002

Case No COMP/M EDF / SEEBOARD. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2002 EN Case No COMP/M.2890 - EDF / SEEBOARD Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/07/2002 Also available in

More information

Case No COMP/M APW / GMG / EMAP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/03/2008

Case No COMP/M APW / GMG / EMAP. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/03/2008 EN Case No COMP/M.5051 - APW / GMG / EMAP Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/03/2008 In electronic form

More information

Case No M PONTMEYER / DBS

Case No M PONTMEYER / DBS EN Case No M.7703 - PONTMEYER / DBS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 20/08/2015 In electronic form on

More information

Case No COMP/M BOEING / LOCKHEED MARTIN / UNITED LAUNCH ALLIANCE JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M BOEING / LOCKHEED MARTIN / UNITED LAUNCH ALLIANCE JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.3856 - BOEING / LOCKHEED MARTIN / UNITED LAUNCH ALLIANCE JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION

More information

Case No IV/M DAIMLER - BENZ / CHRYSLER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/07/1998

Case No IV/M DAIMLER - BENZ / CHRYSLER. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/07/1998 EN Case No IV/M.1204 - DAIMLER - BENZ / CHRYSLER Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/07/1998 Also available

More information

Case No IV/M SCA PACKAGING / REXAM. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/02/1999

Case No IV/M SCA PACKAGING / REXAM. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/02/1999 EN Case No IV/M.1418 - SCA PACKAGING / REXAM Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/02/1999 Also available

More information

Case No IV/M VIVENDI / US FILTERS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/1999

Case No IV/M VIVENDI / US FILTERS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/1999 EN Case No IV/M.1514 - VIVENDI / US FILTERS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/1999 Also available

More information

Case No COMP/M REWE / DELVITA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/04/2007

Case No COMP/M REWE / DELVITA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/04/2007 EN Case No COMP/M.4590 - REWE / DELVITA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 25/04/2007 In electronic form

More information

Case No COMP/M CANON/ OCE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/12/2009

Case No COMP/M CANON/ OCE. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/12/2009 EN Case No COMP/M.5672 - CANON/ OCE Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 22/12/2009 In electronic form on

More information

Case No COMP/M CANON/ IRIS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 22(3) Date:

Case No COMP/M CANON/ IRIS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 22(3) Date: EN Case No COMP/M. 6773 - CANON/ IRIS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 22(3) Date: 26.11.2013 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.11.2012

More information

Case No COMP/M BP / NOVA CHEMICALS / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/07/2005

Case No COMP/M BP / NOVA CHEMICALS / JV. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/07/2005 EN Case No COMP/M.3578 - BP / NOVA CHEMICALS / JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/07/2005 In electronic

More information

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32011M6357

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32011M6357 EN Case No COMP/M.6357 - KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS/ INDAL GROUP Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 23/11/2011

More information

Case No COMP/M KOCH / KOSA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/11/2001

Case No COMP/M KOCH / KOSA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/11/2001 EN Case No COMP/M.2628 - KOCH / KOSA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/11/2001 Also available in the

More information

Case No COMP/M OTTO VERSAND / SABRE / TRAVELOCITY JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M OTTO VERSAND / SABRE / TRAVELOCITY JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.2627 - OTTO VERSAND / SABRE / TRAVELOCITY JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 19/12/2001

More information

Case No COMP/M CRH / CEMENTBOUW. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/09/2003

Case No COMP/M CRH / CEMENTBOUW. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/09/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3267 - CRH / CEMENTBOUW Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/09/2003 Also available in

More information

Case No COMP/M LWM/ RWI/ F&F. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/10/2010

Case No COMP/M LWM/ RWI/ F&F. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/10/2010 EN Case No COMP/M.5902 - LWM/ RWI/ F&F Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 26/10/2010 In electronic form

More information

Case No COMP/M SECOP/ ACC AUSTRIA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/12/2013

Case No COMP/M SECOP/ ACC AUSTRIA. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/12/2013 EN Case No COMP/M.6996 - SECOP/ ACC AUSTRIA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/12/2013 In electronic

More information

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32015M7784

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32015M7784 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.7784 - CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS / OCI BUSINESS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION

More information

Case No IV/M CONSTRUCTOR / DEXION. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/10/1998

Case No IV/M CONSTRUCTOR / DEXION. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/10/1998 EN Case No IV/M.1318 - CONSTRUCTOR / DEXION Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 30/10/1998 Also available

More information

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32014M7023

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32014M7023 EN Case No COMP/M.7023 - PUBLICIS / OMNICOM Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 09/01/2014 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M SIME DARBY/ NEW BRITAIN PALM OIL

Case No COMP/M SIME DARBY/ NEW BRITAIN PALM OIL EN Case No COMP/M.7417 - SIME DARBY/ NEW BRITAIN PALM OIL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 23/01/2015

More information

Case No COMP/M HONEYWELL/ INTERMEC. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 13/06/2013

Case No COMP/M HONEYWELL/ INTERMEC. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 13/06/2013 EN Case No COMP/M.6827 - HONEYWELL/ INTERMEC Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 13/06/2013 In electronic

More information

Case No COMP/M NIPPON SHEET GLAS / PILKINGTON. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/06/2006

Case No COMP/M NIPPON SHEET GLAS / PILKINGTON. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/06/2006 EN Case No COMP/M.4173 - NIPPON SHEET GLAS / PILKINGTON Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 07/06/2006 In

More information

Case No IV/M HAVAS ADVERTISING / MEDIA PLANNING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/06/1999

Case No IV/M HAVAS ADVERTISING / MEDIA PLANNING. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/06/1999 EN Case No IV/M.1529 - HAVAS ADVERTISING / MEDIA PLANNING Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/06/1999

More information

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER / THOMSON MULTIMEDIA / JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M SCHNEIDER / THOMSON MULTIMEDIA / JV. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.2403 - SCHNEIDER / THOMSON MULTIMEDIA / JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 13/06/2001

More information

Case No COMP/M EATON / MOELLER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/04/2008

Case No COMP/M EATON / MOELLER. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/04/2008 EN Case No COMP/M.5050 - EATON / MOELLER Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 01/04/2008 In electronic form

More information

Case M LINAMAR / MONTUPET. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2015

Case M LINAMAR / MONTUPET. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2015 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.7796 - LINAMAR / MONTUPET Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 10/12/2015

More information

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32012M6668

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32012M6668 EN Case No COMP/M.6668 - MONDI / NORDENIA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/08/2012 In electronic form

More information

Case No IV/M FUJITSU / AMDAHL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 008/09/1997

Case No IV/M FUJITSU / AMDAHL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 008/09/1997 EN Case No IV/M.977 - FUJITSU / AMDAHL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 008/09/1997 Also available in

More information

&DVH 1R,90 %5,7,6+ 67((/ +22*29(16 VHH,9(&6& 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 15/07/1999

&DVH 1R,90 %5,7,6+ 67((/ +22*29(16 VHH,9(&6& 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 15/07/1999 EN &DVH 1R,90 %5,7,6+ 67((/ +22*29(16 VHH,9(&6& Only the English text is available and authentic. 5(*8/$7,21((&1R 0(5*(5352&('85( Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 15/07/1999 $OVRDYDLODEOHLQWKH&(/(;GDWDEDVH

More information

Case M SYSCO / BRAKES

Case M SYSCO / BRAKES EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.7986 - SYSCO / BRAKES Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 09/06/2016

More information

Case No COMP/M WPP / GREY. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/01/2005

Case No COMP/M WPP / GREY. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/01/2005 EN Case No COMP/M.3579 - WPP / GREY Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 24/01/2005 In electronic form on

More information

Case No IV/M GEC / GPTH. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/07/1998

Case No IV/M GEC / GPTH. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/07/1998 EN Case No IV/M.1226 - GEC / GPTH Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 27/07/1998 Also available in the CELEX

More information

Case No COMP/M OFFICE DEPOT / GUILBERT. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 23/05/2003

Case No COMP/M OFFICE DEPOT / GUILBERT. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 23/05/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3108 - OFFICE DEPOT / GUILBERT Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 23/05/2003 Also available

More information

Case No COMP/M COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN / MEYER INTERNATIONAL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN / MEYER INTERNATIONAL. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.1873 - COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN / MEYER INTERNATIONAL Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date:

More information

Case No COMP/M AGCO / VALTRA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/12/2003

Case No COMP/M AGCO / VALTRA. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/12/2003 EN Case No COMP/M.3287 - AGCO / VALTRA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 12/12/2003 Also available in the

More information

Case M DEERE & COMPANY / WIRTGEN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/08/2017

Case M DEERE & COMPANY / WIRTGEN. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 03/08/2017 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.8493 - DEERE & COMPANY / WIRTGEN Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION

More information

Case No COMP/M RENESAS TECHNOLOGY/ NEC ELECTRONICS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE

Case No COMP/M RENESAS TECHNOLOGY/ NEC ELECTRONICS. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE EN Case No COMP/M.5535 - RENESAS TECHNOLOGY/ NEC ELECTRONICS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 02/12/2009

More information

Case No IV/M ** ICI / WILLIAMS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/1998

Case No IV/M ** ICI / WILLIAMS. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE. Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/1998 EN Case No IV/M.1167 - ** ICI / WILLIAMS Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/04/1998 Also available in

More information