EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission decision concerning Case FR/2014/1604: Leased lines markets in France
|
|
- Diana Patience Morris
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, C(2014) 4055 Autorité de Régulation des Communications électroniques et des Postes (ARCEP) 7, square Max Hymans F Paris-Cedex 15 France For the attention of: Mr Jean-Ludovic Silicani President Fax: Dear Mr Silicani, Subject: Commission decision concerning Case FR/2014/1604: Leased lines markets in France Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC I. PROCEDURE On 10 May 2014 the Commission registered a notification from the French national regulatory authority, Autorité de régulation des communication électroniques et des postes (ARCEP), concerning the wholesale markets for terminating segments of leased lines 1 and trunk segments of leased lines 2 in France. Two national consultations 3 have been carried out: from 27 November 2013 to 8 January 2014, and from 19 February to 26 March Corresponding to market 6 in the Commission Recommendation 2007/879/EC of 17 December 2007 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communication networks and services, OJ L 344, , p. 65, (the Recommendation). This market is not listed in the Recommendation. However, this market was listed as market 14 of the Commission Recommendation 2003/311/EC of 11 February 2003 on relevant product and services markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with the Framework Directive, OJ L 114, , p. 45. In accordance with Article 6 of the Framework Directive. Commission européenne/europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel
2 A request for information (RFI) 4 was sent to ARCEP on 19 May 2014 and the reply was received on 22 May Additional information was received on 27 May Pursuant to Article 7(3) of the Framework Directive, national regulatory authorities (NRAs), the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Commission may make comments on notified draft measures to the NRA concerned. II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAFT MEASURE II.1. Background ARCEP previously notified the wholesale markets for terminating and (intra- and interterritorial) trunk segments of leased lines in 2010 and In 2010, ARCEP found France Télécom (FT) to have significant market power (SMP) on all identified relevant markets, i.e. mainland France - la Reunion; mainland France Guyana; and Martinique Guyana and made it subject to a set of obligations. In 2011, ARCEP regulated four additional inter-territorial trunk segments of leased lines (Saint-Barthélemy - Metropolitan France; Saint-Barthélemy Guadeloupe; Saint-Barthélemy Martinique; Saint-Barthélemy Saint-Martin). The operator Global Caribbean Network (GCN) was found to have SMP on all markets and the full set of obligations was imposed on it with the exception of accounting separation. In both cases, the Commission had no comments. II.2. Market definition II.2.1. Wholesale market for terminating segments of leased lines ARCEP includes in the market all active products fulfilling the specific business requirement in terms of high quality data connectivity services (i.e. including guaranteed repair time), irrespective of transmission capacity, interface (traditional PDH/SDH or alternative ATM/Ethernet) or underlying infrastructure (copper or fibre). ARCEP proposes to refine the boundaries between market 5 and market 6 of the Recommendation given there is evidence of a strong differentiation occurring in France between standard mass-market bitstream and bitstream access tailored for specific business purposes with high quality requirements. Accordingly, ARCEP proposes to no longer include in market 5 DSL bitstream access with guaranteed repair time (of less than 4 hours) and includes it instead in market 6 together with the traditional copper leased lines and ad hoc dedicated fibre local loop accesses. 6 ARCEP concludes that the relevant market is national in scope, covering mainland France and the overseas territories Pursuant to Article 5(2) of the Framework Directive. Notifications registered respectively under case numbers FR/2010/1050 (second round review), and FR/2011/1238 (territory of Saint-Barthélémy). I.e. Business specific offers, FTTO-type ( BLOD ). Such infrastructures should be distinguished from mass-market FTTH loops which are subject to symmetrical regulation in France. Départements et collectivités d'outre-mer. 2
3 II.2.2. Wholesale markets for trunk segments of leased lines The relevant product market includes the sub-marine cables 8 which are composed of two parts: a submarine element and a terrestrial complement. The product market includes all trunk segment services, irrespective of transmission capacity and interface. ARCEP defines 15 individual markets for inter-territorial trunk segments of leased lines (i.e. trunk segments between territories). 9 ARCEP further explains that while there is currently no submarine cable serving Saint- Pierre-et-Miquelon, a call for tender has been launched for its deployment, which is foreseen to be completed within the timeframe of the present market analysis. Should this be the case, ARCEP explains they will have to analyse the resulting market. II.3. The three criteria test with respect to trunk segments of leased lines 10 After carrying out the three criteria test 11, ARCEP concludes that the segments Mayotte- Mainland France, Mayotte-Reunion will not be subject to ex ante regulation; in particular because Orange is subject to a number of obligations under the State fiscal aid scheme, e.g. non-discriminatory access, non-excessive pricing 12. The segments Martinique Guadeloupe, Martinique Mainland France and Guadeloupe Mainland France will remain unregulated but based on the observation of the high (by international comparison) tariffs, ARCEP intends to put in place (through a separate decision) a tariff monitoring system as from The same approach (i.e. no ex-ante regulation but price monitoring) will apply to Saint-Martin Mainland France, Guadeloupe-Saint-Martin and Martinique-Saint Martin. The routes Réunion - Mainland France, Saint-Barthélemy trunk segments, Guyane - Mainland France, as well as Guyane-Martinique, are found to be susceptible to ex ante regulation Contrary to the previous market analysis, ARCEP excludes from the market definition microwave links because of their inability to meet the necessary quality of service and evolution requirements. Indeed, already in its previous analysis, ARCEP had stressed that the substitutability with microwave links could be compromised for future capacity needs because of: (i) the difficult deployment of new infrastructures in Saint-Barthélemy, and (ii) economic non-viable deployment of high capacity microwave links. According to ARCEP these observations have materialised. Martinique Mainland France; Guadeloupe Mainland France; Martinique Guadeloupe; Saint- Martin Mainland France; Saint-Martin Guadeloupe; Saint-Martin Martinique; Saint-Barthélemy Mainland France; Saint-Martin Saint-Barthélemy; Saint-Barthélemy Martinique; Saint- Barthélemy Guadeloupe; Guyane - Mainland France; Martinique Guyane; Réunion Mainland France; Mayotte Mainland France; Réunion Mayotte. ARCEP is also analysing the three criteria with respect to market 6 but since the latter is on the list of relevant markets, ARCEP's three criteria test will be summarized only with respect to trunk segments. ARCEP investigates the following three criteria: (i) high barriers to entry, (ii) no tendency towards effective competition, and (iii) insufficiency of competition alone to address the identified market failures. See law n of 25 May 2009 relating to oversee territories economic development. 3
4 Although a second cable (LION) has been deployed on the route Réunion - Mainland France as compared to the previous market analysis (when SAFE was the single cable conveying the traffic), Orange keeps the control over both cables, and in particular both landing stations. With regard to Saint-Barthelemy trunk segments, ARCEP is of the view that GCN has a control over an infrastructure which is particularly difficult to duplicate given the small volumes of data exchanged with Saint-Barthélemy. GCN has the monopoly of commercializing capacities and landing on the GCN cable. Absent other providers on the GCN cable, only the deployment of another cable could impact on the competitive situation on the market. ARCEP notes in this respect that according to available data the project of extending the SSCS cable (to serve Saint-Barthelemy and the Dutch part of Saint Martin) does not guarantee that the deployment and commercial launch of this cable would take place within the timespan of the present market analysis. Concerning the segments Guyane-Mainland France and Guyane-Martinique ARCEP concludes that barriers to entry are high since Orange has sole access to the nonreplicable landing station of the cable America II, which is the only cable serving Guyane. ARCEP further argues that there is no trend towards effective competition over the review period, despite some on-going projects whose evolution ARCEP will continue to closely follow. In ARCEP's view competition law is not sufficient to remedy the identified competition problems, particularly concerning the terrestrial complementary services 13. II.4. Finding of significant market power II.4.1. Wholesale terminating segments of leased lines ARCEP finds Orange to have SMP on the basis of mainly (i) size of the company and difficult duplication of infrastructure, (ii) market shares (71%), (iii) vertical integration and economies of scale, and (iv) first mover advantage. II.4.2. Wholesale trunk segments of leased lines Orange and GCN are found to have SMP as follows: a) Orange on the segments Mainland France - French Guyane, French Guyane Martinique and Mainland France La Réunion In line with its previous market analysis, ARCEP distinguishes in its SMP analysis between the terrestrial complement and the sub-marine cable as competitive pressures on these two components of the relevant product market differ. With regard to the submarine cables, ARCEP finds that whereas other members of the consortia can offer leased lines services over America II (Mainland France-Guyane) and SAFE (Mainland France Reunion) to alternative operators, Orange is the only operator active on the services market in France that is also member of the consortia and able to provide endto-end connectivity between Mainland France and Reunion. Orange is also the owner of the LION 1 part of the new LION cable between Mainland France and La Réunion Terrestrial complementary services are traffic conveyance services between the landing station and the point of presence of the alternative operators. LION has been deployed in two branches: LION 1 deployed by Orange (between Ile Maurice, La Réunion and Madagascar), and LION 2 deployed by the consortium Orange group-société Réunionnaise du Radiotéléphonie (SFR Group). 4
5 Concerning the terrestrial complementary services, ARCEP finds that only Orange can provide traffic conveyance services between the landing station and the point of presence of the alternative operators because it has sole access to the landing stations concerned. According to ARCEP, Orange's monopoly on the landing stations and terrestrial complementary services would allow it to levy its market power also on the sub-marine cables. b) GCN on the Saint-Bathélemy segments GCN is the only owner of the GCN cable, the only wholesale provider and the only market player able to install new capacities on this segment. There is no competitive pressure on GCN on the relevant segments. ARCEP will remain attentive to the launch of competitive offers and should such offers (based on sub-marine and/or terrestrial complement) appear the NRA may re-analyse the market. II.5. Regulatory remedies II.5.1. Wholesale terminating segments of leased lines ARCEP intends to impose on Orange the following obligations: (i) access, (ii) nondiscrimination, (iii) transparency, including the publication of a reference offer and transmission of interconnection conventions, (iv) quality of service, (v) price control, and (vi) cost accounting/accounting separation. Copper-based offers on traditional interfaces (LPT offers) will be subject to cost orientation. Concerning copper access, ARCEP proposes progressive and partial lifting of price control to start in ARCEP considers 3 tariff zones: (i) a 'cost-oriented tariff monopolistic zone corresponding to MDFs which are not unbundled, i.e. where Orange is the only operator proposing copper bitstream business offers; (ii) zones, where infrastructure-based competition has recently developed 15, i.e. MDFs where there is at least one alternative operator in addition to Orange proposing copper bitstream business offers with repair times less than 4 hours, and which have been unbundled for less than 7 years and where ARCEP mandates 'non-eviction tariffs'; and (iii) zones, where infrastructure-based competition has materialised (where the price control would be lifted) corresponding to MDFs where there is at least one alternative operator in addition to Orange proposing copper bitstream business offers with repair times less than 4 hours and which have been unbundled for at least 7 years 16. ARCEP will review annually the boundaries of the de-regulated areas. With respect to ad hoc dedicated fibre local loop accesses part of market 6, ARCEP proposes, instead of the currently nationally applicable price regulation, to differentiate between two zones: (i) a zone which is effectively competitive and might be deregulated given that at least one alternative operator is in the position to provide a competitive I.e. «zone géographique dite «zone de concurrence récente par les infrastructures cuivre».the respect of the non-eviction principle will be checked against the average costs borne by an efficient operator operating both on the mass and business markets, i.e. un opérateur tiers générique efficace et mixte. This should allow operators to propose alternative unbundling-based offers in the relevant geographic zone. I.e. zone géographique dite «zone de concurrence établie par les infrastructures cuivre». ARCEP indicates that in those areas, more than 50% of DSL access with repair time 4h are provided by alternative operators on the basis of LLU. ARCEP indicates in its reply to the request for information that Orange s retail market share (self-supply) remains in Q below [ ]% (compared to [ ]% in Q4 2008), and is expected to further decrease during the market review. 5
6 offer throughout the entire territory, and (ii) a zone which is not sufficiently competitive, where the non-eviction regime will be maintained and reinforced by a non-excessive pricing regime. ARCEP will identify the boundaries of the zone prone for de-regulation on the basis of a network topology model, in order to assess in each commune that the reach of the alternative operators fibre networks is at least comparable to Orange s network 17. ARCEP proposes to eventually lift price regulation from the communes where three criteria 18 are cumulatively met and to review annually the boundaries of the deregulated areas on the basis of data collected commune per commune. ARCEP sustains, however, that the state of competition in some areas would justify the partial lifting of price regulation already as of January 2015, i.e. prior to the development of the model. 19 II.5.2. Wholesale trunk segments of leased lines ARCEP intends to impose on Orange the following obligations on the segments Mainland France - la Reunion, Mainland France - Guyane, Martinique - Guyane: (i) access to the terrestrial complement, optical termination and colocation, (ii) nondiscrimination, (iii) transparency, including the publication of a reference offer, (iv) price control (cost orientation) with respect to SAFE (la Réunion) and AMERICA II (Guyane/Martinique), and (v) cost accounting 20. Similar obligations, also applicable to the submarine cable, are proposed to be imposed on GCN on the Saint-Barthélemy routes The work on the network topology model would start immediately after the adoption of the present draft measure and would last for a period of months. ARCEP clarifies that in the context of the public consultation several operators and municipalities have requested that, such as proposed for copper-based access (which is subject to price de-regulation only when unbundling has occurred for at least 7 years) price de-regulation for fibre-based access occurs only after a certain period of time in order to ensure a temporary protection of their investments in FTTH. In this respect, ARCEP states that it would consider the introduction of such a criterion when setting the forthcoming network topology model. ARCEP explains that the effective competition zone identified is reduced as compared to the zone initially proposed in the public consultation. A first approach was to include in this zone communes where at least 5 altnets are present. A more detailed analysis (commune per commune) showed that this criterion does not guarantee a sufficient coverage of altnets s networks and therefore effective competition. ARCEP therefore proposes the following 3 criteria: the theoretical economic potential of a given territory (measured by the density of >10 employees businesses) should be >50/km2; the number of deployments should be sufficiently significant, i.e. more than 50 active accesses sold on the retail market; and presence in the commune of active altnets' effectively deployed networks with a network reach at least comparable to that of Orange, i.e. at the least 50% of BLOD-based accesses available in the commune has been constructed by altnets. ARCEP has already identified around 10 communes where the 3 criteria are fulfilled and indicates that Orange s share of the fibre infrastructures is around 33% on average in those communes. Like in the previous market review, an accounting separation obligation is not proposed on this market. 6
7 III. COMMENTS On the basis of the present notification and the additional information provided by ARCEP, the Commission has the following comment. 21 Geographic differentiation of price remedies on the market for terminating segments of leased lines ARCEP proposes to identify zones where sufficient competitive pressure exerted on Orange would lead to lifting price regulation on its copper-based and as well on its fibre-based wholesale accesses for businesses. The Commission acknowledges that in certain areas alternative high quality copper-based or fibre-based products (fulfilling the high quality requirements of business customers) are offered in competition with Orange, and that these areas exhibit more competitive characteristics. This is also evidenced by the relatively high market shares of alternative operators in some areas, as well the fact that alternative operators seem to have fully replicated Orange s fibre infrastructure (for business purposes) in some communes. The Commission notes, however, that the delineation of the different zones is primarily based on the presence of one or more alternative operators providing a wholesale offer, although, specifically for fibre-based wholesale access, ARCEP looks at other criteria as well. The latter include the percentage share of accesses provided by the various operators and will take into consideration the reach of the alternative operators network in order to assess the competitive conditions and, consequently, lift price control in some areas. The Commission would like to recall that the number of operators present in a given area is not by itself a criterion sufficiently detailed or robust to identify real differences in competitive conditions. Irrespective of the outcome of the pending acquisition process of a major LLU player by a coaxial cable-based wholesale broadband access provider or of any other possible transaction, the Commission wishes to observe that the market structure at any given moment could have an impact on the strategy of the various operators to deploy FTTH networks and on the availability of adequate wholesale access offers. Against this background, the Commission calls on ARCEP to include in its final measure additional evidence that will be taken into account for delineating the boundaries of the areas. Such evidence should include information on the distribution of market shares and the evolution of shares over time in a given MDF or area and evidence of differentiated retail or wholesale pricing, which might indicate different competitive pressures and may even, if such differences are strong and stable enough, lead to identify different product markets (e.g. a segmentation according to bandwidths), which could be subject to different price remedies. 21 In accordance with Article 7(3) of the Framework Directive. 7
8 Furthermore, ARCEP proposes to differentiate areas characterised by different competitive levels and to vary price remedies accordingly in a national market on which an operator has still SMP. The Commission notes that ARCEP is using the term "competitive area" to characterise the zones where price control will be relaxed or lifted while pursuant to Article 16(3) Framework Directive when a market is effectively competitive all remedies should be withdrawn. Against this background, the Commission would like to stress that the term "competitive area" ("zone de concurrence ) is misleading when used to describe areas for which ARCEP establishes SMP and sets certain remedies. In order to ensure legal certainty, ARCEP should use an appropriate wording in its final measure. Pursuant to Article 7(7) of the Framework Directive, ARCEP shall take the utmost account of the comments of other NRAs, BEREC and the Commission and may adopt the resulting draft measure; where it does so, shall communicate it to the Commission. The Commission s position on this particular notification is without prejudice to any position it may take vis-à-vis other notified draft measures. Pursuant to Point 15 of Recommendation 2008/850/EC 22 the Commission will publish this document on its website. The Commission does not consider the information contained herein to be confidential. You are invited to inform the Commission 23 within three working days following receipt whether you consider that, in accordance with EU and national rules on business confidentiality, this document contains confidential information which you wish to have deleted prior to such publication. 24 You should give reasons for any such request. Yours sincerely, For the Commission, Robert Madelin Director-General Commission Recommendation 2008/850/EC of 15 October 2008 on notifications, time limits and consultations provided for in Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, OJ L 301, , p. 23. Your request should be sent either by CNECT-ARTICLE7@ec.europa.eu or by fax: The Commission may inform the public of the result of its assessment before the end of this three-day period. 8
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.9.2014 C(2014) 6809 final Autorité de Régulation des Communications électroniques et des Postes (ARCEP) 7, square Max Hymans F-75730 Paris-Cedex 15 France For the attention
More informationComments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC 1
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26/05/2011 C(2011) 3855 SG-Greffe (2011) D/8477 Autorité de Régulation des Communications électroniques et des Postes (ARCEP) 7, square Max Hymans F-75730 Paris-Cedex 15 For
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Michaelides,
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 16.12.2014 C(2014) 10121 final Γραφείο Επιτρόπου Ρυθμίσεως Ηλεκτρονικών Επικοινωνιών Και Ταχυδρομείων (OCECPR) Helioupoleos 12 1101 Λευκωσία Cyprus For the attention of: Mr.
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14/12/2012 C(2012) 9778 Γραφείο Επιτρόπου Ρυθµίσεως Ηλεκτρονικών Επικοινωνιών Και Ταχυδροµείων (OCECPR) Helioupoleos 12 1101 Λευκωσία Cyprus For the attention of: Dr Polis
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.11.2012 C(2012) 8828 Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicaciones (CMT) Carrer de la Marina 16-18 E-08005 Barcelona Spain For the attention of: Mr. Bernardo Lorenzo Presidente
More informationCommission decision concerning Case EL/2010/1130: wholesale broadband access - further details of price control remedy
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 14/10/2010 C(2010)7224 SG-Greffe (2010) D/16116 EΘΝΙΚΗ ΕΠΙΤΡΟΠΗ ΤΗΛΕΠΙΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΤΑΧΥ ΡΟΜΕΙΩΝ (EETT) Λ. Κηφισίας 60 GR-151 25 Μαρούσι Greece For the attention of: Mr. Dr.
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.12.2012 C(2012) 9843 final Commission for Communications (COMREG) Block DEF - Abbey Court - Irish Life Centre, Lower Abbey St. Dublin 1 Ireland For the attention of: Mr
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.10.2016 C(2016) 6910 final Office of Communications (OFCOM) Riverside House - 2a Southwark Bridge Road - SE1 9HA London United Kingdom For the attention of: Mrs. Sharon
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Silicani, Commission decision concerning:
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 28.11.2014 C(2014) 9270 final Autorité de Régulation des Communications électroniques et des Postes (ARCEP) 7, square Max Hymans F-75730 Paris-Cedex 15 France For the attention
More informationCase SI/2009/0957: Wholesale (physical) network infrastructure access (including shared or fully unbundled access) at a fixed location
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11/09/2009 C(2009)7007 SG-Greffe (2009) D/5397 Agencija za pošto in elektronske komunikacije Republike Slovenije (APEK) Stegne 7, p.p. 418 1001 Ljubljana Slovenia For the
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 24.4.2015 C(2015) 2885 final Γραφείο Επιτρόπου Ρυθμίσεως Ηλεκτρονικών Επικοινωνιών Και Ταχυδρομείων (OCECPR) Helioupoleos 12, 1101 Λευκωσία, Cyprus For the attention of: Mr
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Adams,
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.11.2013 C(2013) 7694 final Conference of Regulators (CRC) c/o Vlaamse Regulator voor de Media Boulevard du Roi Albert II 20, B 21 1000 Brussels Belgium For the attention
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Case AT/2014/1617: Voice call termination on individual mobile networks in Austria
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 2.7.2014 C(2014) 4640 final Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH (RTR) Mariahilferstraße 77-79 A-1060 Wien Austria For the attention of: Mr Johannes Gungl Fax: + 43 1 58
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Homann,
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.03.2014 C(2014) 1787 final Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA) Tulpenfeld 4 53113 Bonn Germany For the attention of: Mr Jochen Homann President Fax: +49 228 14 69 04 Dear Mr Homann,
More informationComments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC 1
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 22/07/2010 C(2010) 5215 SG-Greffe (2010) D/11369 National Communications Authority (NHH) Ostrom u. 23-25. H-1015 Budapest Hungary For the attention of: Mr Ferenc Bánhidi Vice-president
More informationBEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case NL/2017/1960
BoR (17) 53 BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case NL/2017/1960 Wholesale high-quality access provided at a fixed
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission Decision concerning Case DK/2014/1665: Review of the LRAIC model on the fixed markets in Denmark for the year 2015
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 24.11.2014 C(2014) 9090 final Danish Business Authority (DBA) Dahlerups Pakhus Langelinie Allé 17 DK-2100 Copenhagen Denmark For the attention of: Ms. Betina Hagerup Director
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Case RO/2015/1805: Wholesale central access provided at a fixed location for mass-market products in Romania
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 15.12.2015 C(2015) 9590 final Autoritatea Naţională pentru Administrare şi Reglementare în Comunicaţii (ANCOM) Delea Noua 2 030925 Bucharest Romania For the attention of:
More informationCase AT/2009/0970: Wholesale broadband access in Austria. Opening of Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7(4) of Directive 2002/21/EC 1
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5/10/2009 C(2009)7720 SG-Greffe (2009) D/6009 Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH (RTR) Mariahilferstraße 77-79 A-1060 Wien Austria For the attention of: Mr Georg Serentschy
More informationDecision to lift reservations pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC 1
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 20.7.2012 C(2012) 5302 final Autorité de Régulation des Communications Electroniques et des Postes (ARCEP) 7, square Max Hymans F-75730 Paris-Cedex 15 France For the attention
More informationComments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC 1
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26/03/2008 SG-Greffe (2008) D/201384 Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs- GmbH (RTR) Mariahilferstraße 77-79 A-1060 Wien Austria For the attention of: Mr. Georg Serentschy Mr.
More informationNOTIFICATION OF DRAFT MEASURES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7(3) OF DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC For the markets for
NOTIFICATION OF DRAFT MEASURES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7(3) OF DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC For the markets for Retail leased lines, Wholesale terminating segments of leased lines, irrespective of the technology used
More informationBEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case NL/2015/1727
BoR (15) 85 BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case NL/2015/1727 Wholesale local access provided at a fixed location
More informationRECOMMENDATIONS. (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/710/EU)
11.10.2014 L 295/79 RECOMMDATIONS COMMISSION RECOMMDATION of 9 October 2014 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance
More informationCOMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of (Text with EEA relevance)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.10.2014 C(2014) 7174 final COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 9.10.2014 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Opening of Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.2.2018 C(2018) 930 final Agencija za komunikacijska omrežja in storitve Republike Slovenije (AKOS) Stegne 7 1000 Ljubljana Slovenia For the attention of Ms Tanja Muha Director
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission Decision concerning Case NL/2015/1794: Wholesale local access provided at a fixed location in the Netherlands
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.11.2015 C(2015) 8657 final Autoriteit Consument & Markt (ACM) Zurichtoren Muzenstraat 41 2511 WB Den Haag Netherlands For the attention of Mr Henk Don Vice Chairman Fax:
More informationBEREC Opinion. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2012/ :
BEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2012/1328-1329: Wholesale physical network infrastructure access at a fixed
More informationTelecom Italia response to Draft BEREC report on relevant market definition for business services BoR (10) November 2010
Telecom Italia response to Draft BEREC report on relevant market definition for business services BoR (10) 46 18 November 2010 Executive summary Telecom Italia (TI) appreciates that BEREC followed-up a
More informationElectronic Communications and Postal Regulatory Authority Decision No of 14 December 2010
Note: This is a translation into English. For all legal purposes, only the French version is valid. Electronic Communications and Postal Regulatory Authority Decision No. 2010-1312 of 14 December 2010
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Homann
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.4.2013 C(2013) 2064 Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA) Tulpenfeld 4 D-53113 Bonn Germany For the attention of: Mr. Jochen Homann Präsident Fax: +49 228 14 6904 Dear Mr Homann Subject:
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 344/65 RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION
28.12.2007 Official Journal of the European Union L 344/65 RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 17 December 2007 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications
More informationBoR (14) 73. BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis (definition and remedies)
BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis (definition and remedies) 5 June 2014 Contents Executive summary... 3 I. Introduction... 6 II. Basic principles... 7 III. Main cases since
More informationBEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2013/1498
BoR (13) 171 BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2013/1498 Wholesale markets for call termination on individual
More informationThe FTTH Council is concerned by a number of specific aspects of this consultation which it would like to set out at the outset.
Introduction The FTTH Council welcomes the opportunity to reply to these consultations, Review of the wholesale local access market and Review of the wholesale broadband access market. The FTTH Council
More informationCase AT/2009/0970: Wholesale broadband access (WBA) in Austria
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 07.12.2009 C(2009)10006 SG-Greffe (2009) D/10967 Rundfunk und Telekom Regulierungs-GmbH (RTR) Mariahilferstraße 77-79 A-1060 Wien Austria For the attention of: Mr Georg Serentschy
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.6.2017 C(2017) 4500 final Český telekomunikační úřad (ČTÚ) Sokolovská 219 P. O. Box 02 22502 Praha 025 Czech Republic For the attention of Mr Jaromír Novák Chairman of
More informationThe EU electronic communications framework: is it on track?
Agenda Advancing economics in business The EU electronic communications framework: is it on track? Across Europe, around 450 detailed market reviews are taking place, as the national regulatory authorities
More informationAnalysing consumer broadband markets in the NGA transition Ilsa Godlovitch
Analysing consumer broadband markets in the NGA transition Ilsa Godlovitch Implementing the New Recommendation on Relevant Markets 18 November 2014, Brussels 0 Broadband markets: from old to new Market
More informationResponse to the consultation on the Draft review of the BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis (definition and remedies).
Response to the consultation on the Draft review of the BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis (definition and remedies). 7 February 2014 FTTH Council Europe ASBL Rue des Colonies
More informationWholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location
Wholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location Wholesale call termination on individual public telephone networks provided at a fixed location Response to Consultation
More informationWholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location
Wholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location Wholesale call termination on individual public telephone networks provided at a fixed location Response to Consultation
More informationBEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case ES/2013/1466
BoR (13) 95 BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case ES/2013/1466 Review of wholesale broadband access prices (market
More informationECTA POLICY POSITION
BoR PC02 (15) 14 Annex 1 ECTA POLICY POSITION ENABLING SERVICE DIFFERENTIATION FOR THE BENEFITS OF CONSUMERS THROUGH THE UNBUNDLING OF LINE ACTIVATION AND FAULT REPAIR SERVICES NOVEMBER 2014 THE ISSUE
More informationAccess to the public telephone network at a fixed location for residential and nonresidential
Access to the public telephone network at a fixed location for residential and nonresidential customers Publicly available local telephone services provided at a fixed location for residential and non-residential
More informationBEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC
BEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC Case CZ/2012/1322: Wholesale broadband access (Market 5) in the Czech Republic Date:
More informationPOST- OG FJARSKIPTASTOFNUN. Market analysis
Appendix A POST- OG FJARSKIPTASTOFNUN Market analysis Analysis of the retail Market for access to the public telephone network provided at a fixed location (Market 1/2008) and The wholesale Market for
More informationRegulatory Principles of NGA
Regulatory Principles of NGA Cara Schwarz-Schilling WIK conference: Review of the European Framework Bonn, 24/25 April 2008 Ofcom Main ERG Activities on NGN/NGA ERG Report on IP-Interconnection (published
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXPLANATORY NOTE. Accompanying document to the
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, SEC(2007) 1483/2 rev1 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXPLANATORY NOTE Accompanying document to the Commission Recommendation on Relevant Product
More informationBoR (11) 20 final. BEREC monitoring report on Broadband Common Positions
BEREC monitoring report on Broadband Common Positions May 2011 MONITORING OF ERG COMMON POSITIONS ON SMP REMEDIES IN RESPECT OF WHOLESALE UNBUNDLED ACCESS, WHOLESALE BROADBAND ACCESS AND WHOLESALE LEASED
More informationTeliaSonera s response to the European Commission s public consultation on the revision of the Recommendation on relevant markets.
Contact Robert Liljeström +46-72-7349091 robert.liljestrom@teliasonera.com Stockholm, 8 January 2013 TeliaSonera s response to the European Commission s public consultation on the revision of the Recommendation
More informationBroadband Development
Broadband Development 5 November 2014 Alexandre Verheyden Jones Day 1 Key points for discussion The Commission Recommendation of 11 September 2013 on consistent non-discrimination obligations and costing
More informationInternational Conference: Regulating the Electronic Communications Market, 26 September 27 September 2016, Budva, Montenegro
International Conference: Regulating the Electronic Communications Market, 26 September 27 September 2016, Budva, Montenegro Communications Regulation Commission Redefined Recommendation 2014/710/EU Relevant
More informationPublic Hearing. MTC Presentation as per Public Notice Nº62, 20 March Miguel Geraldes 11 May 2012
Public Hearing MTC Presentation as per Public Notice Nº62, 20 March 2012 Miguel Geraldes 11 May 2012 Understanding the market analysis Benchmark Comments on CRAN approaches Suggestion 2 Market Analysis
More informationSUMMARY NOTIFICATION FORM: RETAIL INTERNET ACCESS MARKET AND RELEVANT
SUMMARY NOTIFICATION FORM: RETAIL INTERNET ACCESS MARKET AND RELEVANT MARKETS 4 AND 5 1 MARKET DEFINITION 1.1 Affected relevant product/service markets 1 This draft decision, referred to hereafter as Decision
More informationBEREC views on Article 74 of the draft Code Co-investment and very high-capacity (VHC) networks
BEREC views on Article 74 of the draft Code Co-investment and very high-capacity (VHC) networks The Commission s proposals The Commission is seeking to encourage co-investment as a means of mitigating
More informationPrice regulation of unbundled broadband services
Price regulation of unbundled broadband services ARPCE, Brazzaville 19 February 2014 Pedro Seixas, expert ITU International Telecommunication Union Agenda Outline of regulatory issues Price regulation
More informationReSPONSE by Deutsche Telekom. BEREC Public Consultation on the Draft Review of the BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis
ReSPONSE by Deutsche Telekom BEREC Public Consultation on the Draft Review of the BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis February 2014 Executive Summary Deutsche Telekom welcomes
More informationMain conclusions of the broadband and superfast broadband market analyses
Main conclusions of the broadband and superfast broadband market analyses 1 Market analysis: background In mid-2016, Arcep began the process of reviewing its analyses of fixed broadband and superfast broadband
More informationEffective market analysis carried out by national regulatory authorities under EU directives
Effective market analysis carried out by national regulatory authorities under EU directives Mark Scanlan & Ulrich Stumpf Telecommunication Market Analysis for the CEE countries and Baltic States 5-7 October,
More informationNew approach to regulation of fixed and mobile networks
New approach to regulation of fixed and mobile networks Relevant Markets International Forum of CRC: Challenges of the Relevant Market Regulation for Telecommunications Networks and Services, Bogota, 15
More informationWholesale Broadband Access Markets
Wholesale Broadband Access Markets Retail Broadband Market Response to Consultation C09/17 22 nd September 2017 Gibraltar Regulatory Authority Communications Division 2nd Floor, Eurotowers 4, 1 Europort
More informationConsultation document. 18 th July 2011
Transit services in the public telephone network provided at fixed locations Identification and analysis of markets, determination of market power & the setting of remedies Consultation document 18 th
More informationon the European Commission's package of measures to revise the regulatory framework for electronic communications
POSITION PAPER on the European Commission's package of measures to revise the regulatory framework for electronic communications Brussels/Berlin, 29.11.2016 Transparency register/ registrationnumber.:
More informationSession 3: Competition Policy and European Regulation
Session 3: Competition Policy and European Regulation Training on Competition and Changing Market Conditions: Impact on ICT Regulation Addis Ababa, 6 th 9 th November, 2007 By Dr Chris Doyle Warwick Business
More informationPart I PRELIMINARY. Part II MARKET DEFINITION ASSESSING SIGNIFICANT MARKET POWER. Part IV IMPOSITION OF OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
201[ ] ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS (GUIDELINES ON MARKET ANALYSIS AND THE ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANT MARKET POWER FOR NETWORKS AND SERVICES) (ARRANGEMENT OF GUIDELINES) Table of Contents 1. [Short Title]
More informationBEREC Opinion. Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC:
BEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case PL/2011/1260: Revision of dispute settlement decisions concerning voice call
More informationBEREC Opinion. Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC:
BEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case PL/2011/1260: Revision of dispute settlement decisions concerning voice call
More informationDemand side regulation and broadband rollout in France
Demand side regulation and broadband rollout in France Pierre Jean Benghozi CERRE Conference 2017 Brussels, 12 December 2017 Demand side policy: a double question to address Impossibility of separating
More informationTelecoms: how the Article 7 consultation and notification mechanism works: frequently asked questions (see also IP/10/644)
MEMO/10/226 Brussels, 1 June 2010 Telecoms: how the Article 7 consultation and notification mechanism works: frequently asked questions (see also IP/10/644) What is the Article 7 procedure? Article 7 of
More informationCOMMISSION OPINION. of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.11.2011 C(2011) 8569 final COMMISSION OPINION of 25.11.2011 pursuant to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 and Article 10(6) of Directive 2009/73/EC - France -
More informationHow Telecoms Regulation Can Support Businesses
How Telecoms Regulation Can Support Businesses OECD Workshop on Fibre Investment and Policy Challenges Grant Forsyth Head of Global Regulatory and Interconnection BT Global Services April 2008 Background
More informationDraft BEREC report on relevant market definition for business services
Draft BEREC report on relevant market definition for business services PUBLIC CONSULTATION 11 October 19 November 2010 1. Introduction 1. In December 2009 the European Regulators Group ( ERG ) published
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 4 February 2019 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 February 2019 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2017/0294(COD) 5874/19 ER 43 COEST 21 CODEC 239 NOTE From: To: No. Cion doc.: 14204/17 Subject: General Secretariat
More informationMark Naftel Norton Rose
The International Telecommunication Union Regulatory Implications of Broadband Workshop Market Implications of Technologically Neutral Regulation Mark Naftel naftelm@nortonrose.com Dial up access Flat
More informationFlowchart 1: Historical Example
1 Flowchart 1: Historical Example Question: when does a regulator regulate? Based on EU precedents: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/news/explanatorynote-accompanying-commission-recommendation-relevant-product-and-service-markets.
More informationThe three criteria test, the essential facilities doctrine and the theory of monopolistic bottlenecks
The three criteria test, the essential facilities doctrine and the theory of monopolistic bottlenecks Workshop on Effective Competition in Network Industries Justus-Liebig-University Giessen 27 th and
More information15. Salzburger Telekom-Forum 26. August Breitbandregulierung in Europa
15. Salzburger Telekom-Forum 26. August 2014 Breitbandregulierung in Europa Stefan Kramer Regulatory Coordination & Markets Unit Communications Networks, Content & Technology DG The views expressed in
More informationCOMMISSION OPINION. of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.11.2011 C(2011) 8572 final COMMISSION OPINION of 25.11.2011 pursuant to Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 715/2009 and Article 10(6) of Directive 2009/73/EC - France -
More informationResponse to the Consultation: Review of Wholesale Local Access Market
26th May 2010 Corning Limited t +44 (0) 1244 525354 Elwy House f +44 (0) 1244 525380 Lakeside Business Village St David s Park www.corning.com Ewloe Flintshire CH5 3XD Response to the Consultation: Review
More informationRegulation of Broadband access and development of NGA networks in Slovenia
Regulation of Broadband access and development of NGA networks in Slovenia Nataša Vidmar Kraljević, AKOS September 2017, Budva Market development overview Market development Retail market shares by broadband
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 8.11.2017 SWD(2017) 368 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Assessing the amendments to Directive 2009/73/EC setting out rules for gas pipelines connecting the European
More informationCONSULTATION ON THE COMMISSION'S BROADBAND GUIDELINES ON THE APPLICATION OF EU STATE AID RULES TO PUBLIC FUNDING OF BROADBAND NETWORKS
CONSULTATION ON THE COMMISSION'S BROADBAND GUIDELINES ON THE APPLICATION OF EU STATE AID RULES TO PUBLIC FUNDING OF BROADBAND NETWORKS COMMENTS BY TELECOM ITALIA Telecom Italia welcomes the opportunity
More informationBoR (12) 40. BEREC Report of the Consultation on the draft BEREC report on Co-investment and SMP in NGA networks
BEREC Report of the Consultation on the draft BEREC report on Co-investment and SMP in NGA networks 24 May 2012 This document contains BEREC s report on the outcome of the public consultation on the Draft
More informationUndue discrimination by SMP providers How Ofcom will investigate potential contraventions on competition grounds of Requirements not to unduly
Undue discrimination by SMP providers How Ofcom will investigate potential contraventions on competition grounds of Requirements not to unduly discriminate imposed on SMP providers Publication date: 15
More informationReview of the fixed narrowband services wholesale markets Statement on the markets, market power determinations and remedies including further
Review of the fixed narrowband services wholesale markets Statement on the markets, market power determinations and remedies including further consultation Statement and consultation Publication date:
More informationECTA Response to BoR (15) 64 - BEREC Public Consultation. Common Characteristics of Layer 2 Wholesale Access Products 1.
BoR PC02 (15) 14 ECTA Response to BoR (15) 64 - BEREC Public Consultation Common Characteristics of Layer 2 Wholesale Access Products 1 15 July 2015 A. Introduction and Key Comments The European Competitive
More informationEXPERT LEVEL TRAINING ON TELECOM NETWORK COST MODELLING FOR THE HIPSSA REGIONS
EXPERT LEVEL TRAINING ON TELECOM NETWORK COST MODELLING FOR THE HIPSSA REGIONS Banjul 19-23 August, 2013 David Rogerson, ITU Expert International Telecommunication Union 1 Session 2: Understanding the
More information6 Wholesale geographic market definition
Section 6 6 Wholesale geographic market definition Introduction 6.1 Having considered in Section 5 the relevant wholesale product market definitions, the wholesale geographic market definition for each
More informationGSMA comments on the Draft BEREC Report on OTT services (BoR (15) 142)
BoR PC06 (15) 19 GSMA comments on the Draft BEREC Report on OTT services (BoR (15) 142) About the GSMA The GSMA represents the interests of mobile operators worldwide, uniting nearly 800 operators with
More informationRecent Market Analysis and Conclusions. Andrejs Dombrovskis
Recent Market Analysis and Conclusions Andrejs Dombrovskis Baltic Regulators Roundtable 23 August 2018 Summary 2018 Review of data collection systems and questionnaires Finalised analysis of 4 markets:
More informationOFCOM REVIEW OF THE WHOLESALE BROADBAND ACCESS MARKETS 2006/07 TH
OFCOM REVIEW OF THE WHOLESALE BROADBAND ACCESS MARKETS 2006/07 TH 14 FEBRUARY 2007 Executive Summary Cable&Wireless believes that Ofcom is mistaken in its identification of a single retail market for all
More informationERG (09) 21. ERG Report on price consistency in upstream broadband markets
ERG Report on price consistency in upstream broadband markets June 2009 Contents Executive Summary... 2 1 Introduction... 4 2 Value chain in broadband services and corresponding price regulation across
More informationContribution of Orange to BEREC Report on Oligopoly analysis and regulation
Contribution of Orange to BEREC Report on Oligopoly analysis and regulation Document number: BoR (15) 74 July 2015 - Name of the organization responding to the questionnaire: Orange - Brief description
More informationREPUBLIC OF IRAQ COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA COMMISSION
REPUBLIC OF IRAQ COMMUNICATIONS AND MEDIA COMMISSION CONSULTATION DOCUMENT MARKET REVIEWS JUNE 2016 INTRODUCTION The Communications and Media Commission should impose ex-ante regulation only on operators
More informationETNO comments on the ERG draft common position on geographic aspects of market analysis
August 2008 ETNO comments on the ERG draft common position on geographic aspects of market analysis ETNO welcomes the ERG consultation on geographic aspects of market analysis. The Common Position is a
More informationTelecommunications Regulation. PORTUGAL Morais Leitão Galvão Teles Soares Silva
Telecommunications Regulation PORTUGAL Morais Leitão Galvão Teles Soares Silva CONTACT INFORMATION António Lobo Xavier Morais Leitão Galvão Teles Soares Silva Rua Castilho, 165 1070-050 Lisboa Portugal
More informationPURC Roundtable Tallahassee, Florida 29 September Real Competition and Real Regulation Lessons from Europe
PURC Roundtable Tallahassee, Florida 29 September 2004 Real Competition and Real Regulation Lessons from Europe Martin Cave Warwick Business School University of Warwick, UK Martin.Cave@wbs.ac.uk me53
More informationComments on ERG Bitstream Access Consultation document
Comments on ERG Bitstream Access Consultation document This paper provides the European Competitive Telecommunications Association, ECTA, comment on the ERG consultation document. ECTA represents over
More informationCOMISIÓN DEL MERCADO DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES
DRAFT MEASURE CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTACION OF WHOLESALE LINE RENTAL OBLIGATION ON THE RELEVANT MARKET FOR CALL ORIGINATION IN THE FIXED PUBLIC TELEPHONE NETWORK This summary notification form relates
More information