The proposed Code appears (inappropriately) to support incumbents investment models at the expense of competition
|
|
- Roland Montgomery
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Sky s response to the European Commission s consultation on the proposed Directive establishing a new European Electronic Communications Code Introduction 1. Sky plc ( Sky ) 1 is Europe s leading pay TV operator 2 and the UK s second largest broadband and telephony provider. 2. Sky s top line views on the draft Directive establishing a new European Electronic Communications Code ( the proposed Code ) are set out below. In the time available we have focused on two areas of reform: access regulation and consumer protection. 3. On access regulation, our top line position is that we reject the proposed Code s central premise of reducing competition from access seekers in return for entrenching incumbents control over investment. We disagree with the proposed extension of the periodicity of market reviews from three years to five years as it enables greater regulatory forbearance and the introduction of a double-lock system which may weaken a national regulatory authority s ( NRA s ) ability to impose SMP remedies. 4. On consumer protection, the proposed maximum harmonisation approach is overly prescriptive, doesn t recognise differences between how national markets are structured and unduly changes the rules on how and when communications providers communicate with their customers. I. Changes to access regulation The proposed Code appears (inappropriately) to support incumbents investment models at the expense of competition 5. A thriving UK communications sector is crucial for the development of the economy. In this digital age, communications services have rapidly and inextricably become woven into the fabric of the everyday lives of nearly all businesses and individuals. As commerce and society moves online, the central role that the communications sector plays in driving growth and productivity has become even more pronounced. 6. The successful development of the sector over the last ten years has been in part attributable to a regulatory regime that created conditions that were conducive for efficient investment and innovation and which led to effective and sustainable competition over large parts of the value chain. 1 2 Sky plc is a registered company under the EU Transparency Register. Our ID number is See for further information. Sky plc provides pay TV services in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, Austria and Italy. 1
2 7. The strength of the existing European telecoms framework is that it gives NRAs autonomy to weigh factors like promoting investment against promoting competition based on what they see in their own markets. 8. Our main concern is that, throughout the proposed Code, the Commission has placed weight on the fact that certain commercial models (such as co-investment models) are, on their face, pro-competitive. This may be true in some cases but should not be presumed to be true in all cases. Instead, NRAs should assess each commercial model or market development on a case-by-case basis, looking solely on effects on competition. By being more prescriptive about how certain business models or market structures should be treated, the proposed Code may limit NRAs ability to assess the market. This may inappropriately bias NRAs towards entrenching incumbents control over investment and access rather than competition (to the ultimate detriment of consumers) and has the potential to distort the market by promoting certain business models and market structures over others. 9. The following proposed changes are of particular concern: a. Regulatory treatment of new network elements Article 74 appears to be intended to drive co-investment models by allowing co-investors the ability to benefit from firstmover advantages. Effectively, Article 74 acts as a carve-out for 'new network elements' from the requirement to impose remedies on SMP operators under Articles 66 and In our view it s unclear why the Commission saw the need to develop a specific regulatory carve-out for a single investment model. This should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, as explained above, and by reference to the Article 3 objectives. We also argue that access seekers, like Sky, should be able to benefit from access to all products made available through any new network elements on fair and reasonable terms. b. Market analysis procedure - in assessing whether a market tends towards effective competition under Article 65(1)(b), NRAs must, under Article 65(2), take into account (among other things): 'the existence of market developments which may increase the likelihood of the relevant market tending towards effective competition, such as those commercial co-investment or access agreements between operators which benefit competitive dynamics sustainably.' Our concern here is that the Commission is not applying an evidence-based framework and instead appears to assume that coinvestment or access agreements have a positive impact on competition. As explained above, this may be true in some cases but cannot be assumed in all cases. NRAs should be required to look solely at effects on competition and not make generalised assumptions based on the type of business structures used by the operators involved. c. Pricing flexibility - the proposed Code promotes the use of pricing flexibility to encourage investment in next generation networks. For example, Article 72(1) states that '[i]n determining whether or not price control obligations would be appropriate, national regulatory authorities should take into account long-term end-user interests related to the deployment and take-up of next-generation networks, and in particular of very high capacity networks' and that NRAs must 'take into account the benefits of predictable and stable wholesale prices in ensuring efficient entry and sufficient incentives for all operators to deploy new and enhanced networks.' In Sky s view, this reflects a policy shift towards preferring investment over competition, even though investment in very high capacity networks is often dependent on maintaining strong competition. While it may be appropriate to not impose price regulation on significant, risky fibre investments at least for a period in order to encourage appropriate investment, there is a strong risk that competition and consumers will be harmed in the long run from high ongoing prices for wholesale access to the new fibre services. Given the importance of vibrant retail competition in underpinning consumer demand and hence scale for these new fibre investments, it is inappropriate to position pricing flexibility as taking primacy over price regulation in order to promote investment. In practice, an NRA will need to weigh carefully 2
3 based on the available evidence the use of both pricing forbearance and charge controls in serving its objectives, including the promotion of appropriate investment and competition. NRAs already have this power and, in this regard, it is not justified for the proposed Code to elevate the use of one remedy over the other. Extension of the periodicity of market reviews 10. The proposed Code proposes to extend the maximum review period from three to five years to 'allow operators longer term planning' and to 'provide national regulators with greater flexibility as regards the timing of market reviews' (Article 65). In addition, NRAs may request a one year extension to the five year maximum provided that the NRA provides the Commission with a reasonable basis for the extension and that the Commission doesn't object within 1 month of the notified extension. 11. Experience to date shows that there is no sound case for extending the current three year review process, which works well in practice. The key benefit of a shorter cycle is its ability to keep up with changing circumstances and to take into account the very dynamic nature of the telecoms sector. Indeed, to revert back to a longer cycle for review would be to reverse the progress made in 2009 which shortened the cycle to three years. It would also introduce greater uncertainty (e.g. as to the appropriateness of remedies and the impact of market developments). 12. Moreover, there is no evidence at all that the three year review cycle has discouraged investment. On the contrary, infrastructure investments are typically long term with long payback periods much longer than three or even five years and have been possible under the current market review periods. BT constantly claims that since 2010 it has invested substantial amounts in upgrading its network with VDSL technology. It recently stated that it has invested over 10 billion in broadband services over the past decade. New double-lock system allowing EU-level vetoes of proposed SMP remedies 13. Currently, where standard remedies are imposed by an NRA, the Commission may provide comments but ultimately may not veto the imposition of an SMP remedy. As part of the reform of BEREC, a new double-lock system is proposed. Where BEREC and the Commission agree on their position regarding an NRA s draft remedies, the NRA could be required to amend or withdraw the draft measure. 14. In Sky s view, this proposal is unhelpful, as it may weaken NRAs ability to impose remedies. We also question whether the proposed double lock system is compatible with the principle of subsidiarity. II. Changes to consumer protection 15. Sky considers that the current legislative framework or existing market mechanisms are fully adequate to deal with issues that arise in respect of the consumer protection regime applicable to electronic communications services. 16. In this context, the proposed maximum harmonisation approach (Recital 232 and Article 94) is overly prescriptive, doesn t recognise differences between how national markets are structured and unduly changes the rules on how and when communications providers communicate with their customers. Changes in the following areas are of particular concern: a. Switching- Sky notes that the proposed Code envisages (in Article 99(1)) a make before break model for switching (i.e. a new service would need to be up and running before an old service was stopped). The proposed Code also provides that the receiving provider shall lead the switching and porting process (Article 99(5)). 3
4 However, in Sky s view, no further measures are required to facilitate switching, as the current switching processes work well for consumers. There is no evidence of serious consumer harm; nor is there any evidence of any adverse effects on competition, whether in the provision of bundles, or of individual services to justify further intervention and a move to a receiving provider led process. Further, we consider that it is inappropriate to examine switching issues, in any sector, through the lens of a pre-determined preference for a receiving provider led process, given the significant costs for consumers associated with receiving provider led processes. These costs include: i. Many switches taking longer; ii. Consumers receiving fewer retention offers from their existing provider and there being fewer opportunities for the existing provider to right-size the consumer s existing package so it best meets the consumer s needs and budget; iii. Consumers not knowing the implications of switching when they agree to switch; iv. Consumers are more likely to be the victim of slamming, erroneous transfers or mis-selling and v. The underlying processes are complex and costly to implement with those costs invariably being passed on to consumers. National regulatory authorities should be expected to evaluate the costs and benefits of different switching processes carefully to ensure than any changes are necessary and proportionate before introducing process reforms. The Code, to the extent it includes prescriptive rules on switching, should reflect that approach instead of a pre-determined preference for receiving provider led processes in all cases. b. Bundled offers - the proposed extension of certain key articles in the Code to all elements of a bundle (Article 100), is far too broad and ill-considered and, in the absence of evidence of consumer harm or market failure, causes Sky serious concern. In the first instance, it is so broad that there appears to be no limit to the type of bundled products that the provision could apply to. Second, in the context of pay TV, the provision of pay TV services is fundamentally different to communications services not least as no physical infrastructure (namely a telephone line) is required to be switched. Moreover, pay TV is already extensively regulated under consumer protection laws deriving from various existing EU Directives (e.g. Unfair Contract Terms Directive, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, and the Consumer Rights Directive) in addition to the UK Consumer Rights Act which has new provisions specific to digital content. The draft Digital Content Directive 3 is a more appropriate vehicle to address any perceived gaps in the legal framework covering pay TV services. Inclusion in the Code risks muddling content services with communications services when the two are fundamentally different. c. Early termination charges ( ETCs ) - The proposed Code (Article 98(4)) appears to lay down only two bases for calculating ETCs To reflect the value of subsidised equipment bundled with the contract or reimbursement for any other promotional advantages marked as such at the moment of the contract conclusion. The first of these reflects the mobile model of subsidised handsets and the second reflects the current legal approach in some countries (e.g., Italy). Neither of these reflects what is common across the UK market which is to base ETCs on the subscription 3 Proposal for a Directive on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content,com(2015)634 final. 4
5 price that the consumer would have paid if they had adhered to the terms of the contract they agreed. This approach is broadly designed to ensure providers are able to recover a broad range of sunk acquisition costs (e.g., for equipment and services such as installation) that are typically not passed on to consumers as upfront payments. ETCs are already regulated by unfair terms legislation which ensures that consumers are protected by only having to pay fair ETCs. This means that Article 98(4) is unnecessary. If it does remain in the proposed Code in some form, at the very least, NRAs should have discretion to reflect the different market structures and pricing models in place in the Member State. d. Notice and churn right if any changes that are not exclusively to the benefit of the end-user - Article 20(2)) of the current Universal Services Directive provides a penalty-free churn right and prescriptive notification requirement in the event of a modification to the contractual conditions. However, Ofcom s rules (General Condition 9.6) include a threshold of material detriment before this applies. Ofcom s approach is a sensible one but Ofcom could not maintain it under the Code due to maximum harmonisation A materiality threshold is necessary as it limits the number of contract change notices providers need to give in highly competitive and innovative sectors where products and services change regularly to meet evolving consumer needs. The new language in Article 98(3) would conceivably require contract change notices to be issued on a durable medium for modest changes that are likely to only impact a few customers (for example changes to call rates to obscure destinations). This change would cause annoyance to consumers (who would receive notices from their provider that they do not consider important) and would have a significant and costly operational impact on all providers in the UK. e. Prescribed form of contract information Under the proposed Code (Article 95(5)) BEREC will be expected to issue a contract summary template that providers will need to complete and provide to customers. In Sky s view this approach mandates how communications providers communicate with their customers in an overly-prescriptive manner. 17. On a more positive note, we note that under the proposed Code 24 month contracts will remain possible (Article 98(1)). This is particularly useful when set against the de facto 12 month limit in the draft Digital Content Directive. There is now a clear and very fundamental inconsistency between the Digital Content Directive and the proposed Code which we hope will be resolved in the context of the ongoing Council negotiations on the Digital Content Directive. In our view, contracts of up to 24 months are preferable to 12 month contracts as they preserve flexible cost recovery options that benefit consumers looking for low entrycost access to innovative new products and services. Sky December
BEREC views on the European Parliament first reading legislative resolution on the European Commission s proposal for a Connected Continent Regulation
BEREC views on the European Parliament first reading legislative resolution on the European Commission s proposal for a Connected Continent Regulation General remarks In line with its statutory duty of
More informationBT s response to Ofcom consultation document. Price Rises in Fixed Term Contracts
BT s response to Ofcom consultation document Price Rises in Fixed Term Contracts 14 March 2013 1 Executive Summary We welcome the opportunity to comment on this consultation on Price Rises in Fixed Term
More informationBEREC views on Article 74 of the draft Code Co-investment and very high-capacity (VHC) networks
BEREC views on Article 74 of the draft Code Co-investment and very high-capacity (VHC) networks The Commission s proposals The Commission is seeking to encourage co-investment as a means of mitigating
More informationTelecoms: how the Article 7 consultation and notification mechanism works: frequently asked questions (see also IP/10/644)
MEMO/10/226 Brussels, 1 June 2010 Telecoms: how the Article 7 consultation and notification mechanism works: frequently asked questions (see also IP/10/644) What is the Article 7 procedure? Article 7 of
More informationACT position on the proposal for a Directive on contracts for the supply of digital content - April 2016
Source. The Association of Commercial Television in Europe represents the interests of leading commercial broadcasters in 37 European countries. The ACT member companies finance, produce, promote and distribute
More informationThe new European Electronic Communications Code (EECC)
The new European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) A concise legal appraisal of its final draft Ελληνικό Τμήμα FITCE Thessaloniki, 15 th December 2017 By Ioannis Tzionas Professor of European & International
More informationGSMA comments on the Draft BEREC Report on OTT services (BoR (15) 142)
BoR PC06 (15) 19 GSMA comments on the Draft BEREC Report on OTT services (BoR (15) 142) About the GSMA The GSMA represents the interests of mobile operators worldwide, uniting nearly 800 operators with
More informationBEREC Opinion. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2012/ :
BEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2012/1328-1329: Wholesale physical network infrastructure access at a fixed
More informationContribution of Orange France Telecom Group to the public consultation on the Draft BEREC report on best practices to facilitate switching
Contribution of Orange France Telecom Group to the public consultation on the Draft BEREC report on best practices to facilitate switching July 2010 1 Orange France Telecom Group welcomes the opportunity
More informationUndue discrimination by SMP providers How Ofcom will investigate potential contraventions on competition grounds of Requirements not to unduly
Undue discrimination by SMP providers How Ofcom will investigate potential contraventions on competition grounds of Requirements not to unduly discriminate imposed on SMP providers Publication date: 15
More informationCONSULTATION ON THE COMMISSION'S BROADBAND GUIDELINES ON THE APPLICATION OF EU STATE AID RULES TO PUBLIC FUNDING OF BROADBAND NETWORKS
CONSULTATION ON THE COMMISSION'S BROADBAND GUIDELINES ON THE APPLICATION OF EU STATE AID RULES TO PUBLIC FUNDING OF BROADBAND NETWORKS COMMENTS BY TELECOM ITALIA Telecom Italia welcomes the opportunity
More informationIntroducing Carrier Selection & Carrier Pre- Selection in Malta
Introducing Carrier Selection & Carrier Pre- Selection in Malta Report on Consultation and Decision May 2004 Malta Communications Authority "Il-Pjazzetta", Suite 43/44, Tower Road, Sliema SLM 16, Malta,
More informationRetail Bundling in Hull. KCOM Bundling of SMP and non-smp Products
KCOM Bundling of SMP and non-smp Products Statement Publication date: 8 October 2010 Contents Section Page 1 Summary 2 2 Background to the Consultation 3 3 Responses to the consultation and Ofcom s determination
More informationRegulating oligopolies in telecoms: the new European Commission guidelines
Agenda Advancing economics in business Regulating oligopolies in telecoms: the new European Commission guidelines In February 2018 the European Commission published draft guidelines on determining significant
More informationRECOMMENDATIONS. (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/710/EU)
11.10.2014 L 295/79 RECOMMDATIONS COMMISSION RECOMMDATION of 9 October 2014 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance
More informationConsumer Switching. Response by KCOM
Consumer Switching Response by KCOM 4 May 2012 Introduction KCOM Group delivers communications services to a range of businesses and consumers throughout the UK under a number of different brands. Kcom
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. The new Universal service and Users rights Directive
EUROPEAN COMMISSION The new Universal service and Users rights Directive Alexandre de Streel DG Information, Brussels ITU, Seminar on Universal Service access and service Bratislava, 6 March 2002 1 OUTLINE
More informationDTI/HMT Review on Concurrent Competition Powers in Sectoral Regulation
12 January 2007 Emma Campbell Assistant Director Economic Regulation Team Consumer and Competition Policy Directorate Department of Trade and Industry 1 Victoria Street LONDON SW1H 0ET DAVID STEWART Director
More informationRESPONSE BY BRITISH SKY BROADCASTING GROUP PLC TO OFCOM S CONSULTATION DOCUMENT Simplifying Non-Geographic Numbers 1 April 2011
RESPONSE BY BRITISH SKY BROADCASTING GROUP PLC TO OFCOM S CONSULTATION DOCUMENT Simplifying Non-Geographic Numbers 1 April 2011 This is the response by British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC ( Sky ) to Ofcom
More informationTelecom Italia response to Draft BEREC report on relevant market definition for business services BoR (10) November 2010
Telecom Italia response to Draft BEREC report on relevant market definition for business services BoR (10) 46 18 November 2010 Executive summary Telecom Italia (TI) appreciates that BEREC followed-up a
More informationPosition Paper. Cable Europe position paper on the Telecoms Review. Executive Summary. Policy objectives
4 April 2016 Position Paper Cable Europe position paper on the Telecoms Review Executive Summary This Position Paper outlines Cable Europe s response to the Commission s consultation on the revision of
More informationBEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case ES/2013/1466
BoR (13) 95 BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case ES/2013/1466 Review of wholesale broadband access prices (market
More informationETNO contribution to the BEREC consultation on the Broadband Promotion Report
ETNO contribution to the BEREC consultation on the Broadband Promotion Report January 2012 Executive Summary Broadband promotion policies are an important tool to contribute to the achievement of the Digital
More informationSession 3: Competition Policy and European Regulation
Session 3: Competition Policy and European Regulation Training on Competition and Changing Market Conditions: Impact on ICT Regulation Addis Ababa, 6 th 9 th November, 2007 By Dr Chris Doyle Warwick Business
More informationBEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2013/1498
BoR (13) 171 BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case FI/2013/1498 Wholesale markets for call termination on individual
More informationCOMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of (Text with EEA relevance)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.10.2014 C(2014) 7174 final COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 9.10.2014 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante
More informationThe EU electronic communications framework: is it on track?
Agenda Advancing economics in business The EU electronic communications framework: is it on track? Across Europe, around 450 detailed market reviews are taking place, as the national regulatory authorities
More informationETNO Comments on the BEREC report on the impact of premium content on ECS markets and the effect of devices on the open use of the Internet
BoR PC07 (17) 01 November 2017 ETNO Comments on the BEREC report on the impact of premium content on ECS markets and the effect of devices on the open use of the Internet BEREC approved for public consultation
More informationPrice regulation of unbundled broadband services
Price regulation of unbundled broadband services ARPCE, Brazzaville 19 February 2014 Pedro Seixas, expert ITU International Telecommunication Union Agenda Outline of regulatory issues Price regulation
More informationOfcom review of additional charges. Including non-direct debit charges and early termination charges
Including non-direct debit charges and early termination charges Statement Publication date: 19 December 2008 Contents Section Annex Page 1 Executive Summary 1 2 Introduction 8 3 Ofcom s general approach
More informationThe opinions expressed in this presentation are the personal views of the author and do not prejudge decisions of the RRT
Functional and Structural Separation Models TAIEX Workshop on regulatory framework and further development of electronic communications Belgrade, 8, 9 April 2010 Lina Rainiene, Communications Regulatory
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.12.2012 C(2012) 9843 final Commission for Communications (COMREG) Block DEF - Abbey Court - Irish Life Centre, Lower Abbey St. Dublin 1 Ireland For the attention of: Mr
More informationNEXT GENERATION ACCESS IN NEW BUILD DEVELOPMENTS SKY S RESPONSE TO OFCOM S CONSULTATION
NEXT GENERATION ACCESS IN NEW BUILD DEVELOPMENTS SKY S RESPONSE TO OFCOM S CONSULTATION 25 June 2008 Summary Sky welcomes Ofcom s consultation on this important subject. NGA in new buildings is a crucial
More informationOfcom review of additional charges Including non-direct debit charges and early termination charges
Ofcom review of additional charges Including non-direct debit charges and early termination charges Consultation Publication date: 28 February 2008 Closing Date for Responses: 8 May 2008 Foreword Competition
More informationMobile call termination market review Ofcom. 4 June Response by Telefonica UK Ltd
Mobile call termination market review 2015-18 Ofcom 4 June 2014 Response by Telefonica UK Ltd Executive summary Telefonica UK Ltd ( Telefonica ) welcomes the opportunity to respond to Ofcom s consultation
More informationFixed Narrowband Retail Services Market Review
Introduction Fixed Narrowband Retail Services Market Review Response by KCOM 4 June 2009 KCOM welcomes the opportunity to comment on Ofcom s proposals in respect of the fixed narrowband retail services
More informationBoR (10) 34 Rev1b. BEREC report of the consultation on the best practices to facilitate switching BoR (10) 34
BEREC report of the consultation on the best practices to facilitate switching BoR (10) 34 October 2010 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction Stakeholder responses - obstacles 3 2 Stakeholder responses
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM NOTE: This explanatory memorandum gives an overview of the current rules and the relevant Commission decision-making practice. It also outlines the possible scope for amendments
More informationTelecommunications Retail Service Quality Framework
Telecommunications Retail Service Quality Framework 2 CONTENTS TELECOMMUNICATIONS RETAIL SERVICE QUALITY FRAMEWORK... 1 PURPOSE OF THIS PAPER... 3 INTRODUCTION... 3 Changes to Act... 3 Framework... 4 Next
More informationWholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location
Wholesale call origination on the public telephone network provided at a fixed location Wholesale call termination on individual public telephone networks provided at a fixed location Response to Consultation
More informationReview of the Electronic Communications Regulatory Framework. Executive Summary 6: NRAs and BEREC
Review of the Electronic Communications Regulatory Framework Executive Summary 6: NRAs and BEREC 1. General context and objectives An efficient governance with modernised institutions is essential in order
More informationBEREC Opinion. Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC:
BEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case PL/2011/1260: Revision of dispute settlement decisions concerning voice call
More informationBEREC Opinion. Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC:
BEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case PL/2011/1260: Revision of dispute settlement decisions concerning voice call
More informationexperience Principal, International Ofcom April 2008
Functional separation: the UK experience Tom Kiedrowski Tom Kiedrowski Principal, International Ofcom April 2008 Agenda Section 1 Background and context Section 2 Approach and rationale Section 3 Taking
More informationBEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC
BEREC Opinion Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC Case CZ/2012/1322: Wholesale broadband access (Market 5) in the Czech Republic Date:
More informationAIIP comments on the
AIIP comments on the BEREC Common Position on best practice remedies on the market for wholesale broadband access (including bitstream access) imposed as a consequence of a position of significant market
More informationETNO comments on the ERG draft common position on geographic aspects of market analysis
August 2008 ETNO comments on the ERG draft common position on geographic aspects of market analysis ETNO welcomes the ERG consultation on geographic aspects of market analysis. The Common Position is a
More informationUndue discrimination by SMP providers Consideration of responses to a proposal for investigating potential contraventions on competition grounds of
Undue discrimination by SMP providers Consideration of responses to a proposal for investigating potential contraventions on competition grounds of Requirements not to unduly discriminate imposed on SMP
More informationSESSION 4: STRATEGIC COSTING FOR BROADBAND SERVICES
SESSION 4: STRATEGIC COSTING FOR BROADBAND SERVICES ITU-D REGIONAL ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL FORUM OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS/ICTS FOR ASIA AND PACIFIC Yangon, The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, 1 September
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.9.2014 C(2014) 6809 final Autorité de Régulation des Communications électroniques et des Postes (ARCEP) 7, square Max Hymans F-75730 Paris-Cedex 15 France For the attention
More informationCable Europe response to BEREC s consultation on its draft report on oligopoly analysis and regulation
Cable Europe response to BEREC s consultation on its draft report on oligopoly analysis and regulation 30 July 2015 Cable Europe welcomes the opportunity to comment on the BEREC s draft report on oligopoly
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 344/65 RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION
28.12.2007 Official Journal of the European Union L 344/65 RECOMMENDATIONS COMMISSION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 17 December 2007 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications
More informationECTA RESPONSE DRAFT BEREC PRELIMINARY REPORT IN VIEW OF A COMMON POSITION ON MONITORING MOBILE COVERAGE TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION BY BEREC ON THE
ECTA RESPONSE TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION BY BEREC ON THE DRAFT BEREC PRELIMINARY REPORT IN VIEW OF A COMMON POSITION ON MONITORING MOBILE COVERAGE BoR (17) 186 8 NOVEMBER 2017 1. Introduction ECTA, the
More informationThe Clean Energy package. Position of the Austrian electricity industry
The Clean Energy package Position of the Austrian electricity industry The Clean Energy package On 30 November 2016, the European Commission published a wide-ranging package of measures entitled Clean
More informationBEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case NL/2015/1727
BoR (15) 85 BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7 of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case NL/2015/1727 Wholesale local access provided at a fixed location
More informationDCMS Future Telecoms Infrastructure Review: Call for Evidence, BT s response (January 2018) Annex 1: Referenced responses to DMCS Questions
DCMS Future Telecoms Infrastructure Review: Call for Evidence, BT s response (January 2018) Annex 1: Referenced responses to DMCS Questions 1 What is the existing UK telecoms market structure and policy
More informationHow to regulate next-generation access (if at all)?
Agenda Advancing economics in business How to regulate next-generation access (if at all)? European telecoms regulators have, for some time, been faced with the question of how next-generation access (NGA)
More informationQUESTIONNAIRE on the BB Guidelines ( Guidelines )
Fastweb s response to the Commission consultation on the Revision of the Community Guidelines for the application of State aid rules in relation to rapid deployment of broadband networks QUESTIONNAIRE
More informationIntroducing Carrier Selection & Carrier Pre- Selection in Malta
Introducing Carrier Selection & Carrier Pre- Selection in Malta Consultative Paper August 2002 Malta Communications Authority "Il-Pjazzetta", Suite 43/44, Tower Road, Sliema SLM 16, Malta, Europe. Tel:
More information3 Group response to BEREC s consultation on the draft report on best practices to facilitate switching.
Hutchison Whampoa (Europe) Limited Contact: Melina Violari, Regulatory Affairs Manager, 3G Europe Hutchison Europe Brussels Branch Square de Meeus 35 1000 Brussels T: + 32 2 509 0075 3 Group response to
More informationNOTIFICATION OF DRAFT MEASURES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7(3) OF DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC For the markets for
NOTIFICATION OF DRAFT MEASURES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 7(3) OF DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC For the markets for Retail leased lines, Wholesale terminating segments of leased lines, irrespective of the technology used
More informationSet free by competition? Transitional access regulation of telecoms incumbents
Agenda Advancing economics in business Set free by competition? Transitional access regulation of telecoms incumbents The European Commission s proposed package of reforms of the EU telecoms regulatory
More informationThe BEREC Opinion on the draft. methodologies. Dr Iris Henseler-Unger, Vice President BNetzA 8th EETT International Conference Athens, 16/17 May 2013
The BEREC Opinion on the draft Recommendation on consistent nondiscrimination obligations and costing methodologies Dr Iris Henseler-Unger, Vice President BNetzA 8th EETT International Conference Athens,
More informationBIS Call for Evidence on Switching Principles. BT s response. December 2015
BIS Call for Evidence on Switching Principles BT s response December 2015 1 BT Response to BIS Call for Evidence on Switching Principles Summary of BT s views 1. BT fully supports the aims expressed by
More informationBoR (12) 40. BEREC Report of the Consultation on the draft BEREC report on Co-investment and SMP in NGA networks
BEREC Report of the Consultation on the draft BEREC report on Co-investment and SMP in NGA networks 24 May 2012 This document contains BEREC s report on the outcome of the public consultation on the Draft
More informationETNO Reflection Document on the ERG Draft 2010 Work Programme
ETNO Reflection Document on the ERG Draft 2010 Work Programme November 2009 Executive Summary Introduction ETNO welcomes the ERG Work Programme (WP) consultation. We understand that the 2010 WP is of transitional
More informationThe FTTH Council is concerned by a number of specific aspects of this consultation which it would like to set out at the outset.
Introduction The FTTH Council welcomes the opportunity to reply to these consultations, Review of the wholesale local access market and Review of the wholesale broadband access market. The FTTH Council
More informationBEREC input to the European Commission Implementing Act on fair use policy and sustainability of the abolition of retail roaming surcharges
BEREC input to the European Commission Implementing Act on fair use policy and sustainability of the abolition of retail roaming surcharges 13 October, 2016 Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1. Background...
More informationBoR (11) 20 final. BEREC monitoring report on Broadband Common Positions
BEREC monitoring report on Broadband Common Positions May 2011 MONITORING OF ERG COMMON POSITIONS ON SMP REMEDIES IN RESPECT OF WHOLESALE UNBUNDLED ACCESS, WHOLESALE BROADBAND ACCESS AND WHOLESALE LEASED
More informationCharge controls for Wholesale Line Rental implementation and cost orientation
Charge controls for Wholesale Line Rental implementation and cost orientation Second Statement Publication date: 23 February 2010 Contents Section Page 1 Summary 2 2 Framework for decisions 4 3 WLR Core
More informationOECD Policy Guidance for Protecting and Empowering Consumers in Communication 1 Services
2 OECD POLICY GUIDANCE FOR PROTECTING AND EMPOWERING CONSUMERS IN COMMUNICATION SERVICES OECD Policy Guidance for Protecting and Empowering Consumers in Communication 1 Services Over the last decade, the
More informationBEREC Opinion on. Phase II investigation. pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case DE/2014/1642
BEREC Opinion on Phase II investigation pursuant to Article 7a of Directive 2002/21/EC as amended by Directive 2009/140/EC: Case DE/2014/1642 Call termination on individual public telephone networks provided
More informationContents. BoR (18) 34
BEREC report on the outcome of the public consultation on the impact of premium content on ECS markets and the effect of devices on the open use of the Internet 8 March 2018 Contents 1. Introduction...
More informationEuropean Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken
European Association of Co-operative Banks Groupement Européen des Banques Coopératives Europäische Vereinigung der Genossenschaftsbanken EACB position paper on the technical advice of the Committee of
More informationCOMISIÓN DEL MERCADO DE LAS TELECOMUNICACIONES
DRAFT MEASURE CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTACION OF WHOLESALE LINE RENTAL OBLIGATION ON THE RELEVANT MARKET FOR CALL ORIGINATION IN THE FIXED PUBLIC TELEPHONE NETWORK This summary notification form relates
More informationResponse to the consultation on the Draft review of the BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis (definition and remedies).
Response to the consultation on the Draft review of the BEREC Common Position on geographical aspects of market analysis (definition and remedies). 7 February 2014 FTTH Council Europe ASBL Rue des Colonies
More informationECTA POLICY POSITION
BoR PC02 (15) 14 Annex 1 ECTA POLICY POSITION ENABLING SERVICE DIFFERENTIATION FOR THE BENEFITS OF CONSUMERS THROUGH THE UNBUNDLING OF LINE ACTIVATION AND FAULT REPAIR SERVICES NOVEMBER 2014 THE ISSUE
More informationEUROPEAN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS CODE
The Consumer Voice in Europe EUROPEAN ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS CODE BEUC key demands for trilogue negotiations on market design Contact: Guillermo Beltrà digital@beuc.eu BUREAU EUROPÉEN DES UNIONS DE
More informationNational Grid s specific response to questions raised in E10- GNM-13-03b: ERGEG consultation on Pilot Framework Guidelines on gas balancing rules.
National Grid s specific response to questions raised in E10- GNM-13-03b: ERGEG consultation on Pilot Framework Guidelines on gas balancing rules. Problem identification, scope, definitions, purpose, policy
More informationWindEurope considers that repowered projects could be further provided with a clear path-to-market via:
As every energy technology, wind energy assets have an end to their operational lifetime. A significant proportion of the installed EU wind fleet will come to the end of its lifetime between 2020 and 2030.
More informationRegulatory certainty to support investment in full-fibre broadband. Ofcom s approach to future regulation
Regulatory certainty to support investment in full-fibre broadband Ofcom s approach to future regulation STRATEGIC POLICY POSITION Publication Date: 24 July 2018 About this document Full-fibre broadband
More information10109/14 KM/ek 1 DG E2B
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 26 May 2014 10109/14 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0309 (COD) TELECOM 119 COMPET 294 MI 447 CONSOM 121 CODEC 1340 NOTE from: Presidency to: Delegations No. Cion
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 19.12.2018 COM(2018) 891 final 2018/0435 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 by granting
More informationScottish Parliament Edinburgh EH99 1SP. Dear Convener
Minister for UK Negotiations on Scotland s Place in Europe Michael Russell MSP T: 0300 244 4000 E: scottish.ministers@gov.scot Bruce Crawford MSP, Convener of the Finance and Constitution Committee & Graham
More informationProposal for a Directive on Better Enforcement and Modernisation of EU Consumer Protection Rules
INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE FEDERATION OF EUROPE Europe s video games industry Proposal for a Transparency Register ID Number: 20586492362-11 Summary: ISFE welcomes the Commission s initiative to achieve a more
More informationPrice rises in fixed. term contracts Issued 3 January Contact for response: Michael Eagle
Price rises in fixed term contracts Issued 3 January 2013 FCS response 14 th March 2013 Contact for response: Michael Eagle Federation of Communication Services Ltd Burnhill Business Centre, Provident
More informationINTUG Position Statement on the European Commission s proposals following review of the European Telecommunications Framework.
INTUG Position Statement on the European Commission s proposals following review of the European Telecommunications Framework. Introduction The International Telecommunications Users Group (INTUG) was
More informationAmCham EU comments on the European Commission s Preliminary Report on the E-Commerce Sector Inquiry
AmCham EU comments on the European Commission s Preliminary Report on the E-Commerce Sector Inquiry Promoting e-commerce across the EU - fostering free and open competition while protecting innovation
More informationMark Naftel Norton Rose
The International Telecommunication Union Regulatory Implications of Broadband Workshop Market Implications of Technologically Neutral Regulation Mark Naftel naftelm@nortonrose.com Dial up access Flat
More informationResponse to the Consultation on the BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules 18.
BoR PC 01 (16) 055 Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.v. 10907 Berlin Response to the Consultation on the BEREC Guidelines on the Implementation by National Regulators of European Net Neutrality Rules 18. July
More informationReview of the General Conditions of Entitlement. Transposition table for general conditions
Review of the General Conditions of Entitlement Transposition table for general conditions ANNEX 17 Publication Date: 19 September 2017 Transposition table The table below shows how we have decided to
More informationOligopolies in electronic communications: more concentration, more regulation?
Agenda Advancing economics in business Oligopolies in electronic communications: more concentration, more regulation? The consolidation trend in fixed and mobile telecoms is leading to more concentrated
More informationAUSTRIA INTRODUCTION REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT. Main regulatory developments
AUSTRIA Note: This document is an excerpt from the Staff Working Document attached to the Communication 'Towards a Single European Telecoms Market 13 th Progress Report (COM (2008(153)). The Communication
More informationTelecoms and Pay TV Complaints Q1 (January to March) 2014
Telecoms and Pay TV Complaints Q1 (January to March) 2014 Publication date: 27 June 2014 About this document This document presents complaints recorded by Ofcom against the largest telecoms and pay TV
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Dear Mr Homann,
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 13.03.2014 C(2014) 1787 final Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA) Tulpenfeld 4 53113 Bonn Germany For the attention of: Mr Jochen Homann President Fax: +49 228 14 69 04 Dear Mr Homann,
More informationTelecoms and Pay TV Complaints Q2 (April to June) 2016
Telecoms and Pay TV Complaints Q2 (April to June) 2016 Publication date: 28 September 2016 About this document This document presents data for complaints recorded by Ofcom against the largest telecoms
More informationBRITISH FILM INSTITUTE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ISSUED PAPER ASSESSING STATE AID FOR FILMS AND OTHER AUDIVISUAL WORKS SEPTEMBER 2011
BRITISH FILM INSTITUTE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ISSUED PAPER ASSESSING STATE AID FOR FILMS AND OTHER AUDIVISUAL WORKS SEPTEMBER 2011 British Film Institute s identification number on the EU Transparency register
More informationEUROPEAN COMMISSION. Comments pursuant to Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.11.2012 C(2012) 8828 Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicaciones (CMT) Carrer de la Marina 16-18 E-08005 Barcelona Spain For the attention of: Mr. Bernardo Lorenzo Presidente
More informationStrategic and Retail Market Review. 3 June 2008
Strategic and Retail Market Review 3 June 2008 Purpose: To outline a comprehensive package of proportionate regulatory measures that will further promote competition and the interest of consumers arising
More information