RUST GRIP TESTING AND CERTIFICATION

Transcription

1 RUST GRIP TESTING AND CERTIFICATION As of March 1, W. 78 th Street Shawnee, Kansas Phone: ; Fax: Website:

2 RUST GRIP Product Test Listings ASTM (Am Society for Testing and Materials) TESTING: B ,000 Hour Salt Spray (Fog) - Salt Spray Fog Testing - RUST GRIP over Steel D D-C Resistance of Insulating Materials - Surface Resistivity = 5.237E+15 - Volume Resistivity = 5.263E+15 D 522 Mandrel Bend - Method A - Conical Mandrel % Elongation - Method B - Cylindrical Bend - No Cracking Over ½ Inch Rod D 610 Percentage of Surface Rusted = Rating 9 D 714 No Blistering = Rating 10 (Perfect) D 1654 No Loss of Adhesion = Rating 10 DG Chemical Resistance = Excellent D 2369 Volatile Content of Coatings g/l and 3.17 gal/lb D 3359 Adhesion and Penetration - Penetration through 18 layers of Lead Based Paint - Rated 5A = Excellent D 4060 Tabor Abrasion Resistance Cycles with a CS 17 Wheel, 1000 Gram Load - 18 milligram loss per 1000 Cycles Rated Excellent D 4541 Standard Method for Pull-0ff Strength - Pull-Off Strength = 1467 D 5894 Standard Practice for Cyclic Salt Fog/UV Exposure of Painted Metal - 10,000 Hours of Exposure - No Signs of Blistering or UV Radiation Degrading - ASTM D 610 Rating: 9-P, 10, and 10 (Perfect) D 6904 Resistance to Wind-Driven Rain for Exterior Coatings Applied to Masonry = No Penetration D 7088 Resistance to Hydrostatic Pressure for Coatings Used in Below Grade Applications Applied to Masonry = No Penetration E Spread of Flame Tests on Pitched Roofs - Class A Non-combustible E Spectral Reflectance - Average of 3 Tests 44.6% Solar Reflectance 55.5% Solar Absorption E 1795 Encapsulation of Leaded Paint in Buildings - Direct Impact Resistance (ASTM D 2794) - Adhesion (ASTM D 3359, D 4541) - Dry Abrasion Resistance (ASTM D 4060) - Water Vapor Transmission (ASTM D 1653) - Flexibility Mandrel Bend (ASTM D 522) - Distilled Water Resistance Immersion 24 hours Tinplated Steel (ASTM D 1308, D 3359) - ¼ Steel or Aluminum (ASTM D 1308, D 4541) - Chemical Resistance 24 Hours- 12 Reagents - Spot Test on Glass (ASTM D 1308) - Surface Burning Characteristics (E 84) - Volatile Organic Content (VOC) ASTM TESTING CONTINUED E 1795 Encapsulation of Leaded Paint in Buildings - (ASTM D 2369, D 4017, D 3960, D 1475) - Weathering (1000 hours) - Aging (interior and exterior) - Scrub Resistance (ASTM D 2486) - Black Plastic No Break thru after 12 cycles) - Mildew Resistance (ASTM D 3273, 3274) - Paint / Repair Ability (ASTM D 3359) - Tensile Properties (6780psi after 3 weeks) - Visco-Elastic Properties (ASTM D 2370 F 963 Compliance with Maximum Soluble Limits - Antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium - Lead, mercury, and selenium G 20 Chemical Resistance of Pipeline Coatings - 5 % Ammonia, 5 % Urea and Diesel Fuel Days No Failure. G 85 Prohesion (Louisiana DOT) Hour Salt Fog - Rated 9 (out of a possible 10 rating) TESTING FOR ABS (AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING), IMO (INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION) AND U.S. COAST GUARD APPROVAL. IMO A 653 Flame Spread and Heat Release - IMO Res. A 653 (16) = Passed MSC 41 Smoke and Toxicity - MSC Res. 41 (64) = Passed Rame-Hart Static Contact Angle (Young s Equation): Static contact angle of Rust Grip is lower than water demonstrating that Rust Grip has exceptional wettability, adhesiveness, and high solid surface free energy for greater penetration into the substrate. China Center for Technical Testing: National Measurement M0729 GB/T Resistance to Salt Fog (2000 hours) GB/T Manuel Aging (2000 hours) GB/T Resistance to Salt Water (1000 hours) GB/T Adhesion (pulling apart method) Window Recycling Test for Encapsulation of Lead Based Paint: Testing Was Done for Encapsulating Existing Lead Based Paint on Windows for HUD - Window coated with RUST GRIP - Cycled 29,700 Times - Coated surface showed no wear, friction burn, or lead-based paint exposure Maximum Temperature Exposure Test: Thermal Analysis Testing was Performed on RUST GRIP to Determine Maximum Temperature Exposure During Application and Operation Maximum temperature is 600 degrees F (315 degrees C) Based on Cyclic and Not Constant Heat Complete Test Results Are Available Upon Request W. 78 th Street Shawnee, Kansas Phone: ; Fax: Website: sales@spicoatings.com

3 RUST GRIP Certifications and Registrations 1. AMERICAN BUREAU OF SHIPPING Passed SOLAS 1974 (as amended) requirements for paints/finish materials Requiring compliance with Parts 2 (Smoke & Toxicity) and 5 (Surface Flammability) of the IMO FTP Code, Res. MSC.61 (67) U.S. Type Approval Certificate No. SL X 2. CRADLE TO CRADLE CERTIFIED SILVER Continual Product Improvement Process Through Five Quality Categories: Material Health, Material Reutilization, Renewable Energy And Carbon Management, Water Stewardship, And Social Fairness. Primary Assessment Body: McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry 3. USDA (UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE) USDA Approved Letter of Authorization from USDA Product Safety Branch Letter of Written Certification as Accepted by USDA from Manufacturer 4. FACTORY MUTUAL APPROVAL Tested and Approved for Metal Roofing 5. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Approved for Use on Qualified Products List Passed Salt Fog Test for 1500 hours 6. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Approved for Use on Qualified Products List 7. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Acceptable for encapsulation of galvanized guardrail 8. UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY Acceptable for encapsulation of steel bridges for Kentucky Department of Highways 9. NATIONAL ROOFING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION Superior Products International II, Inc. is an active member of the NRCA. 10. U.S. PATENT - PATENT NUMBER: 5,695,812 Method for Abating Bio-Hazardous Materials Found in Coatings W. 78 th Street Shawnee, Kansas Phone: ; Fax: Website: sales@spicoatings.com

4 January 11, 2011 Superior Products International II, Inc W. 78 th Street Shawnee, KS Att: Mr. Craig R. Smith Technical Director Re: DL 15881C OBJECTIVE To test a coating for compliance to the salt spray requirements as outlined in the Florida Department of Transportation specification. PRODUCT TESTED Coated panels were submitted by Superior Products II, Inc. and identified as: Rust Grip NS 1, 6-mils through Rust Grip NS 3, 6-mils TEST PROCEDURE The coated panels were exposed in a Salt Fog Chamber maintained in accordance with ASTM B 117, for 15,000 hours. The panels were evaluated periodically for overall blistering in accordance with ASTM D 714 and rust staining in accordance with ASTM D 610. TEST RESULTS The test results can be found in the Appendix. ASTM D 714, Degree of Blistering Blister Size Frequency of Occurrence 10 - None F - Few 8 - Pinpoint size M - Medium 6-1/16-inch diameter approx. MD - Medium Dense 4-1/8-inch diameter approx. D - Dense 2 - ¼-inch diameter approx.

5 Superior Products International II, Inc. Re: DL-15881C January 11, 2011 TEST RESULTS (cont.) ASTM D 610, Degree of Rusting Rust Grade Description 10 No rusting 9 Minute rusting, less than 0.03% of surface area 8 Few isolated areas, less than 0.1% of surface area 6 Extensive rust areas, less than 1% of surface area 4 Rusting to the extent of 10% of surface area 2 Approximately 33% of surface rusted 0 Approximately 100% of surface rusted DL Labs, Inc. Mario Lazaro, Jr. Assistant Technical Director Page 2 of 4

6 Superior Products International II, Inc. Re: DL-15881C January 11, 2011 TEST RESULTS APPENDIX ASTM B 117 SALT SPRAY (FOG) CORROSION RESISTANCE The three coated panels of Rust Grip NS, 6-mils exhibit the following: Blistering Rust Staining 250 Hours Exposure Hours Exposure Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure Page 3 of 4

7 Superior Products International II, Inc. Re: DL-15881C January 11, 2011 TEST RESULTS APPENDIX (cont.) ASTM B 117 SALT SPRAY (FOG) CORROSION RESISTANCE The three coated panels of Rust Grip NS, 6-mils exhibit the following: Blistering Rust Staining 8,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure ,250 Hours Exposure ,500 Hours Exposure ,750 Hours Exposure ,000 Hours Exposure Page 4 of 4

8 Electrical Testing Report Page 1 of 1 Testing : PC Resistance Of Insulating Materials Test Method : ASTM Project Number : P Customer : Suprior Products International II, Inc Attention : Craig Smith Analyst : P. Swint Date : October 30, 2006 Ceh No. 06ID.DI Sample Dimensions : 3" Diameter Disk Electrode Type : Guarded Parallel Plate Electrode Dimensions : Measuring : in. O.D in. Thick : in. O.D in in. Thick Guard : in. O.D in. Thick Measurement Method : Three Terminal Measurement C~rcuit : Parallel Applied Voltage : 300 Volts Electrode Area : cm2 f ledrification Time : 60 Seconds Sample Preparation : Tested as received. Coating was scraped off to measure the nominal thickness. Sample Conditioning : 40+ Hours at 23 C * 2 C 1 50% * 5Oh RH Test Conditions : 23 C * 2 C I 50% f 5% RH Sample Name Nominal Thickness (in) Surface Resistance (fl) Surface Resistivity (Wsquare) Average z l.oode+14 Note: > Means sample exceeded the measuring capabilities of the Megohmmeter. Nominal thickness is based on three measurements then averaged. Plastics Technology Laborator~es. Inc reports are Issued lor the exclus~ve use Of the clients to whom they are addressed. No quotations from reports or use of the Plasllcs Technology Caboralorles Inc name IS permitted excepl as ekpressly authorized In writing Leaers and reports apply only to the speciflc materials, products or processes resled. examined or surveyed and ara not necessarily indrcativs of the qualities ot apparently ident~cal or simllar matenals, products or processes The Liab~lity of Plaslrcs Technolyy Laboratories. Inc wlth respect to services rendered shall be llrn~ted to the amount of cons~deration paid for such servlces and not include any consequential damages 50 Pearl Street, Pittsfield, MA Phone (41 3) , Fax

9 Electrical Testing Repwt Page 1 of 1 Testing : DC Resistance Of Insulating Materials Test Method : ASTM D Project Number : P Revision (1) Remeasured thickness of surface coating Customer : Superior Products International 11, Inc (1&31-06) 399 Attention : Craig Smith Analyst : P. Swint Date : October 30,2006 ceh HQ. W4s.01 Sample Dimensions : 3" Diameter Disk Electrode Type : Guarded Parallel Plate Electrode Dimensions : Measuring : in. O.D in. Thick Guard : in. O.D in. I.D in. Thick Top : in in. Thick Measurement Method : Three Terminal Measurement Circuit : Parallel Applied Voltage : 300 Volts Electrode Area : cm2 Electrification Time : 60 Seconds Sample Prepamtion : Tested as received. Coating was saaped off to measure the nornrnel lhakness. Sample Conditioning : 40+ Hours at 23 C i 2 C / 50% i 5% AH Test Conditions : 23 C * 2 C 1 50% i 5% RH Sample Name Nominal Thickness (in) Volume Resistance In) Volume Resistivity (nacm) Average 2.683E E+15 Nominal thickness is based on three measurements then averaged Volume Resistivity = The effective area of the measuring electrode I Thickness of material Times the measured volume resistance in ohms. Plastlcd Techrialogy Laharatorles. Inc, reporls are Issued for the exclusive use of the cllents to whom they are addressed. No quotations from reports or use of the Plastics Technillqy Laboratorles. Inc name IS perrnrtled except as expressly authorlzad In wrltlng. Letlers and repons apply only to the speclflc materials, products or processes tested, examined or surveyed 2nd are no1 necessarily lndlcatlve of the qualities of apparently identical or similar materials, products or processes. The liability of Plastics Technology Laboratorles, Inc. wlth respect to SeNlCeS rendered shall be limited to the amount of consideration pald for such sew~ces and not include any consequentdal damages. 50 Pearl Street, Pittsfield, MA Phone (413) , Fax

10

11 CORRTECH CORROSION ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGIES Evaluation Report of Rust Grip Test Samples Hwy. 190 Mississippi River Bridge Located in Baton Rouge, LA Prepared For: Superior Products International Mr. Howard Kindig 8740 Bayside Baton Rouge, LA Prepared By: CorrTech Inc. 25 South Street Hopkinton MA CorrTech, Inc. Job No September 2007 CORRTECH, INC. Corporate Office: 25 South Street Hopkinton, MA fax Regional Office: 2269 Sawmill River Road Elmsford, NY fax Regional Office: PO Box 148 East Hampton, CT fax

12 STATEMENT OF LIMITATION The conclusions presented in this document are based on the services described and not on tasks or procedures beyond the scope of the described procedures or the time and budgetary constraints imposed by the contract limitations. CorrTech, Inc. has performed this assessment in a professional manner using that degree of skill and care exercised for similar projects under similar conditions by reputable and competent consultants, and in accordance with the procedures established within CorrTech's quality assurance, quality control protocol. CorrTech, Inc. shall not be responsible for conditions or consequences arising trom relevant facts that were concealed, withheld or not fully disclosed at the time the evaluation was performed. \\1' II II /l1i1i/1111//- ~\\\ ~\ONAl ~~ ~ ~ ~ "~~,..::::::- ~.~.. \",.:. -:;:. ~ r.;...' CCl '. ~ '= ~ j:: :' :~.~ -: ~ "7 :RamonPelaez.:- ~ _ ~ '"'11;:::: :::. 8. : ;::::: :. ~'" ~ ~ ~ -::;., ~."\... '-'t ~.....' AT ~ ~ Y/v (\V ~~' ~ * \\\\'\ ~/111/11/I,,""I\\ h Pelaez, Project Manager NACE CCI 5975 September 2007 aj'~ eport Reviewe~ by Henry Flanagan, PE Certified Coatings Inspector September 2007

13 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background 1 Field InspectionResults I Laboratory Test Results 3 Conclusions 3 Appendix I Bridge Geographical Location Appendix II Photo Log Appendix III ASTM G-20 Laboratory Report

14 Introduction Evaluation Report Rust Grip Test Samples At Hwy. 190 Mississippi River Bridge, Baton Rouge, LA CorrTech, Inc. Job No Page 1 Superior Products International retained the services of CorrTech Inc. for professional corrosion engineering services to evaluate the performance of the Rust Grip Coating System. The coating system had been applied to the structural steel support members on the west approach of Louisiana Hwy. 190 over the Mississippi River Bridge located in Port Allen, Louisiana. The evaluation was performed in accordance with the following standards: ASTM D Standard Method for Evaluating Degree of Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces. ASTM D Standard Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints. ASTM D Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Painted or Coated Specimens Subject to Corrosive Environments ASTM D G (Reapproved 2002) Standard Test Method for Chemical Resistance of Pipeline Coatings. Background The bridge is located in a coastal area and in the vicinity (within 500 ft) of Exxon Refinery, Formosa Plastics, Kaiser Aluminum, and Chemicals and several other industries. This environment is considered corrosive. The Louisiana Department of Transportation designated the test locations to be coated; the areas were previously coated with a 16mil DFT three coat lead based system. The existing lead based coating system was 25 years old and in poor condition. The Rust Grip coating was applied at a total of 4 mills DFT. No surface preparation was performed for the application. The Rust Grip coating was applied on November l0, Field Inspection Results Field inspection was performed by Mr. Henry. P. Flanagan P.E NACE Certified Coatings Inspector # The inspection was performed on November 24, Ffield inspection consisted of visual inspection of the areas coated and scribing (ASTM D ) designated areas for inspection at a later date. The scribed areas were inspected on September 23, 2007 by Mr. Ramon E. Pelaez NACE Certified Inspector # 5975.

15 Evaluation Report Rust Grip Test Samples At Hwy. 190 Mississippi River Bridge, Baton Rouge, LA CorrTech, Inc. Job No Page 2 ASTM D Standard Method for Evaluating Degree of Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces. This test method covers the evaluation of the degree of rusting on painted steel surfaces. ASTM results: Visual Examples Rust Percent of Surface Rusted Grade Spot (s) General (G) Pinpoint (P) 9 Greater than 0.01 percent and up to S 9-G 9-P percent ASTM D Standard Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints. This test method employs photographic reference standards to evaluate the degree of blistering that may develop when paint systems are subjected to conditions which will cause blistering, The degree of blistering is categorized by size and itequency: Size- Reference standards have been selected for four steps as to size on a numerical scale itom 10to 0, in which No. 10represent no blistering Frequency- Reference standards have been selected for four steps in itequencyat each step in size, designated as follows: Dense (D) Medium dense, (MD) Medium, (M) and Few. (F) ASTM D results: Scale Visual Inspection 10 No blistering ASTM D Standard Test Method for Evaluation of Painted or Coated Specimens Subject to Corrosive Environments. This test method covers the treatment of previously painted or coated specimens for accelerated and atmospheric exposure tests and their subsequent evaluation in respect to corrosion, loss of adhesion at the scribe mar, or other film failure. ASTM D results: Ratingof Failureat Scribe(ProcedureA) RepresentativeMeanCreepageFromScribe Millimeters I Inches (Approximate) I RatingNumber Zero I 0 I 10

16 Evaluation Report Rust Grip Test Samples At Hwy. 190 Mississippi River Bridge, Baton Rouge, LA CorrTech, Inc. Job No Page 3 Laboratory Test Results ASTM D G (Reapproved 2002) Standard Test Method for Chemical Resistance of Pipeline Coatings. This test method is intended for evaluating the resistance of pipe coating materials when exposed to various concentrations of reagents suspected of soil contaminants.this test evaluates the relative merits of pipe-coating materials in specific environments.the choice of reagents, concentrations, duration of immersion, temperature of test and properties to be reported are necessarily arbitrary and should be chosen to reflect conditions known to exist along the pipe line right of way. ASTM D G (Reapproved 2002) results: It is considered that Rust Grip is suitable coating for the coating of bare or previously coated bridge structures for corrosion protection. See Appendix IIIfor supporting documentation. Conclusions Based on the field inspection and laboratory testing, Rust Grip is deemed a suitable coating for the protection of steel superstructures coated with lead based coating system in fair to poor condition as long as the substrate is prepared properly and the coating system is mixed and applied in strict accordance with manufacturers recommendations.

17 APPENDIX I Bridge Geographical Location

18 62 ~~1,2, -'~'-'W"'V"""'Ni1~ 3, -, '.m ' r \ \ II \ Yj Vt/ \..~ '~"';. \ $~' I'~.' ~... 1 ~o"a. ~ fp1i I 'Ir I," "-~I -, 4' ( D'k~ ib.. lj ImDla-4: I j~ I

19

20 APPENDIX II Photo Log

21 \ of' _ -.~... 1I'it

22 '" -.-,:.~., """.~":~. ~z,...' '. # ''''.. -~_ ~--- l, I

23 .I... - I,..., j~ \ +=r-- i TI 1 ' 11:; ASTM 610 Rust grade 9 M 714 Scale 10 J ASTM 610 Rust grade 9 M 714 Scale 10 ~ \... --~ 'ade 10 M 714 Scale 10,;z~.~.i;i'... ~. t ;:.-. -\'--. <. '..-. '-'!1j.'- -}Ih 'Or:. \~' I ~~-., 'ade 10 M 714 Scale 10 ASTM 610 Rust grade 10M 714 Scale 10 ASTM 610 Rust grade10 M 714 Scale10

24 I I _L _ ASTM 1654 No creepage from scribe ASTM 1654 No creepage from scribe I I

25 APPENDIX III ASTM G-20 Laboratory Report

26

27

28

29

30 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS ASTM G20 Photos: After 30 Days: Sample #1 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #2 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #19 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #20 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #7 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #8 Exposed to 5% Ammonia

31 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS ASTM G20 Sample #24 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #25 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #13 Exposed to Diesel Sample #14 Exposed to Diesel Sample #29 Exposed to Diesel Sample #30 Exposed to Diesel

32 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS ASTM G20 After 60 Days: Sample #3 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #4 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #21 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #9 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #10 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #26 Exposed to 5% Ammonia

33 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS ASTM G20 Sample #15 Exposed to Diesel Sample #16 Exposed to Diesel Sample #31 Exposed to Diesel

34 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS ASTM G20 After 90 Days: Sample #5 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #6 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #22 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #23 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #11 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #12 Exposed to 5% Ammonia

35 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS ASTM G20 Sample #27 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #28 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #17 Exposed to Diesel Sample #18 Exposed to Diesel Sample #32 Exposed to Diesel Sample #33 Exposed to Diesel

36 ASTM D3359 METHOD A ADHESION TESTING FOR SUPERIOR PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL II, INC. ON RUST GRIP OVER 18 COATS PAINT VTEC TESTED: MARCH 18,

37 March 18, 2005 Client: Attention: Superior Products International II, Inc W. 78 th Street Shawnee, KS J.E. Pritchett Scope: This report contains the reference to the test method, preparation and conditioning of sample, description of material, test and post test observation data, and test results. Test Method: This test was conducted in accordance with ASTM D3359, "Standard Test Method for Measuring Adhesion by Tape Test". Preparation of Material: The Rust Grip coating was applied over 18 coats of an oil based paint totally encapsulating it. The 18 coats of oil based paint was applied on a 1/4" thick cement board and was fully cured. The surface was roughed up with sandpaper before the coating was applied. The Rust Grip coating was applied in one coat at a thickness of 8-10 mils wet and allowed to cure for 14 days. The adhesion test was performed on the Rust Grip coating using "Test Method A" of ASTM D3359. Notice: VTEC Laboratories Inc. will not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from the use of the data in this report, in excess of the invoice. This report pertains to the sample tested only. Such report shall not be interpreted to be a warranty, either expressed or implied as to the suitability or fitness of said sample for such uses or applications, as the party contracting for the report may apply such sample. 2

38 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL II, INC. ASTM D3359 Material Tested: 1) Product Description: Rust Grip 2) Color: Gray 3) Surface: Smooth 4) Sample Selection: Supplier 5) Material Description By: Supplier and VTEC 6) Purpose of Test: Adhesion IV. Test Results Test No. Rating 1 5A 2 5A 3 5A Average 5A V. Disclaimer This is a factual report of the results obtained from the laboratory test of sample products. The results may be applied only to the products tested and should not be construed as applicable to other similar products of the manufacturer. The report is not a recommendation or disapprobation by VTEC Laboratories, Inc. of the material tested. While this report may be used for obtaining product acceptance, it may not be used in advertising. Neil Schultz Executive Director Amirudin Rahim Technical Director 3

39 MICROPHOTO GRAPH FOR SUPERIOR PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL II, INC. ON RUST GRIP OVER 18 COATS PAINT VTEC MARCH 30,

40 March 30, 2005 Client: Attention: Superior Products International II, Inc W. 78 th Street Shawnee, KS J.E. Pritchett Scope: This report contains microphoto graph pictures taken of the cross section. Two photos were taken of the cement board with 18 coats of oil based paint. One photo is the board with the Rust Grip coating and the other is the board without the Rust Grip coating. Both photos were taken at 30x zoom. Preparation of Material: The Rust Grip coating was applied over 18 coats of an oil based paint totally encapsulating it. The 18 coats of oil based paint was applied on a 1/4" thick cement board and was fully cured. The surface was roughed up with sandpaper before the coating was applied. The Rust Grip coating was applied in one coats at a thickness of 8-10 mils wet and allowed to cure for 14 days. Notice: VTEC Laboratories Inc. will not be liable for any loss or damage resulting from the use of the data in this report, in excess of the invoice. This report pertains to the sample tested only. Such report shall not be interpreted to be a warranty, either expressed or implied as to the suitability or fitness of said sample for such uses or applications, as the party contracting for the report may apply such sample. 2

41 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL II, INC. MICROPHOTO GRAPH ¼ Cement Board with 18 coats of oil based paint 3

42 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL II, INC. MICROPHOTO GRAPH ¼ Cement Board with 18 coats of oil based paint and 8-10 wet mils of Rust Grip Neil Schultz Executive Director Amirudin Rahim Technical Director 4

43

44

45

46

47 Testing Results for RUST GRIP Coating After 1000, 5000, and Hours of Exposure in Ultraviolet and Salt-Spray Chambers Blistering and Rusting Evaluation Prepared for Superior Products International II, Inc W. 78th Street Shawnee, Kansas Prepared by Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road San Antonio, Texas November 2014

48 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction Testing Data and Results Conclusions References... 4 Figure Figure Page 1 Images of the Three RUST GRIP Coupons After (a) 1000, (b) 5000, and (c) Hours of Exposure... 2 Table Table Page 1 Ratings of the Coupons After 1000, 5000, and Hours of Exposure... 3 i

49 1 Introduction This report documents testing data and results of coupons coated with RUST GRIP coating after 1000, 5000, and hours of exposure. The average dry film thickness of the coating on the coupons was 6 mils (150 µm). The coated coupons have been exposed to the ultraviolet (UV) radiation and a salt solution for up to hours (60 weeks). The testing has been conducted according to ASTM D5894, Standard Practice for Cyclic Salt Fog/ UV Exposure of Painted Metal. This test simulate realistic test conditions to evaluate the outdoor corrosion of painted metal, including the synergistic effects of multiple factors including condensation, UV exposure, wet/dry cycling, and temperature cycling. The results of this test can be used to assess corrosion performance of coatings subjected to outdoor environmental conditions. The testing was conducted in two week increment which consists of one week of UV exposure and one week of salt fog exposure. For each two week increment, the testing was conducted according to the following procedure. The testing started with fluorescent UV-Condensation exposure, per Section 8.1 of ASTM D5894. Southwest Research Institute (SwRI ) placed three coupons for the coating type in UV-Condensation exposure chamber (here after called UV chamber). The coupons were placed in coupon holders that exposed a part of the coated surfaces of the coupons to the UV light. The coupons were exposed to the UV conditions for 4 hours followed by a 4-hour condensation period. The coupons were exposed for a total of 168 hours (1 week) in this UV chamber. Following UV exposure, the coupons were transferred to the salt spray chamber. The salt fog-dry exposure was conducted in accordance with Section 8.2 of ASTM D5894. The coupons are placed a coupon holder which directly exposed the coupons surfaces to the salt solution which is sprayed on the coupons. The coupons were exposed to a 1 hour fog cycle followed by a 1 hour dry cycle. The salt solution, as per ASTM D5894, consisted of 0.05 percent sodium chloride and 0.35 percent ammonium sulfate by mass. The coupons were exposed to the cyclic salt spray-dry conditions for a total of 168 hours (one week). The two week increment was repeated for 30 weeks. 2 Testing Data and Results The testing data is presented in form of coupons images after 1000, 5000, and hours (6, 30, and 60 weeks) of exposure. Images of the coupons are presented in Figures 1. The testing data is analyzed to determine the blistering and degree of rusting on the coupon. 2.1 Blistering Evaluation: As seen in Figure 1, the coupons shows no signs of blistering after 1000, 5000, and hours of exposure throughout the their surfaces except on edges of the two coupons. The blistering is so minor that it is not even visible in the images presented in Figure 1. This minor blistering is due to the edge effects and not due to the coating characteristics. The coating pass according to ASTM D because of no signs of blistering in the three coupons surfaces which are not affected by the edge effect. 2.2 Discoloration: The UV exposure causes discoloration in the coating but does not affects its corrosion performance. Figure 1 shows visible signs of discoloration in the coupons after 1000, 5000, and hours of exposure. The coupons surfaces after 5000 and hours of exposure show visible signs yellowish red color through their surfaces. This is due to the leaching of a paint solution which was applied on the edges of the coupons. The paint solution was applied to minimize edge effect during the testing. The applied paint solution is red in color, and its leachate due to its interaction with the salt solution is yellowish red. 1

50 (a) 1000 Hours (b) 5000 Hours (c) Hours Figure 1. Images of the Three RUST GRIP Coupons After (a) 1000, (b) 5000, and (c) Hours of Exposure 2

51 Overtime, the paint releases the leachate due to its chemical interaction with the salt solution. The leachate causes the yellowish red color on the coupons surfaces in Figures 1(b) and 1(c). The coupons surfaces are only partially exposed to the UV radiation in the UV chamber. If there is any effect of UV radiation on corrosion performance, it should produce a marked change in coating color and can be distinguished by two shades on a coupon surface. In Figure 1, there are two visible shades of coating colors on all three coupons after 1000, 5000, and hours of exposure. The UV exposure does not affect its corrosion performance as there. The coating does not show any marked change in rusting where discoloration due to UV exposure has occurred. This proves that even though UV exposure causes discoloration of the coating, it does not affect its corrosion performance. 2.3 Rusting Evaluation: The degree of rusting on the three coupons is evaluated in accordance with ASTM D After 1000 hours of exposure, none of the three coupons show rusting and the three coupons are rated 10. This rating means that up to 0.01 percent of the coupon surface has rusted. After 5000 hours of the exposure, the top coupon in Figure 1(b) shows signs of rusting with pin point corrosion spots. Similarly, the middle coupon of Figure 1(b) also shows few pin point corrosion spots, but less compared to the top coupon in Figure 1(b). As seen in top coupon of Figure 1(b), few pinpoint corrosion spots are noticed. The bottom coupon in Figure 1(b) does not show any rusting which is visible with bare eyes. Considering the rusting in the three coupons after 5000 hours of exposure, the top coupon of Figure 1(b) is rated 9-P, and the remaining two coupons are rated 10. After hours of the exposure, the corrosion spots seen in Figure 1(b) persist, but no new corrosion spots could be located on the coupons surfaces that were un affected by the edge effect. Considering this, the top coupon of Figure 1(c) is rated 9-P, and the remaining two coupons are rated 10. The rating data is summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Ratings of the Coupons After 1000, 5000, and Hours of Exposure Rating of the Three Exposure Time (hours) Coupons as Per ASTM D , 10, and P, 10, and P, 10, and 10 3 Conclusions Notes Up to 0.03 percent rusting on the coupons with rust grade 9-P, and up to 0.01 percent rusting on the coupons with rust grade 10 Three coupons coated with RUST GRIP coating were tested according to ASTM D5894 for hours of exposure. The average dry film thickness of the coating on the coupons was 6 mils. The coating show no signs of blistering after 1000, 5000, and hours of exposure. Some blistering is noted on the edges of the two coupons, however, this is due to the edge effect and not due to the deficiency in the coating. The UV radiation causes discoloration of the coating but does not affect its corrosion resistance characteristics. 3

52 The coating shows minimal signs of rusting which is barely visible with bare eyes. This indicates that rusting is due to coting defects during coating preparation process and not due to deficiency in the coating. Therefore, it is concluded that the coating has excellent corrosion resistance characteristics. 4 References ASTM International. ASTM D , Standard Practice for Cyclic Salt Fog/UV Exposure of Painted Metal, (Alternating Exposures in a Fog/Dry Cabinet and a UV/Condensation Cabinet). West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International ASTM D714 02, Standard Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International ASTM D610 08, Standard Practice for Evaluating Degree of Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania: ASTM International

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65 Designation: E An American National Standard Standard Specification for Non-Reinforced Liquid Coating Encapsulation Products for Leaded Paint in Buildings 1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 1795; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. 1. Scope 1.1 This specification covers minimum material performance requirements and laboratory test procedures for nonreinforced liquid coating encapsulation products (single or multiple-coat systems) for leaded paint in buildings. Performance properties addressed in this specification are: Impact resistance, Adhesion, Dry Abrasion Resistance, Water Vapor Transmission, Water and Chemical Resistance, Surface Burning Characteristics, Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Content, Weathering, Aging, Scrub Resistance, Mildew Resistance, Paintability/Repairability, Flexibility, and Tensile Properties. 1.2 This specification does not address the selection of an encapsulation product for specific use conditions. Specific use conditions may require performance values other than those stated in this specification. See Guide E This specification complements Specification E 1797 for reinforced liquid coating encapsulation products. 1.4 This specification does not cover the use of encapsulation products on industrial steel structures nor on residential coated metal surfaces because no corrosion control requirements are included. 1.5 This specification applies to any non-reinforced liquid applied product that relies primarily on adhesion for attachment to the surface. These products are used to encapsulate a leaded paint surface with the intent of reducing human exposure to lead. 1.6 The results of the test methods included in this specification will not necessarily predict field performance. 1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory requirements prior to use. 2. Referenced Documents ASTM Standards: D 16 Terminology for Paint and Related Coatings, Materials, and Applications D 522 Test Methods for Mandrel Bend Test of Attached Organic Coatings D 823 Practices for Producing Films of Uniform Thickness of Paint, Varnish, and Related Products on Test Panels D 1005 Test Methods for Measurement of Dry-Film Thickness of Organic Coatings Using Micrometers D 1186 Test Methods for Nondestructive Measurement of Dry Film Thickness of Nonmagnetic Coatings Applied to a Ferrous Base D 1212 Test Methods for Measurement of Wet Film Thickness of Organic Coatings D 1308 Test Method for Effect of Household Chemicals on Clear and Pigmented Organic Finishes D 1475 Test Method for Density of Paint, Varnish, Lacquer, and Related Products D 1653 Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Organic Coating Films D 2370 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Organic Coatings D 2486 Test Method for Scrub Resistance of Wall Paints D 2794 Test Method for Resistance of Organic Coatings to Effects of Rapid Deformation (Impact) D 3273 Test Method for Resistance to Growth of Mold on the Surface of Interior Coatings in an Environmental Chamber 1 This specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.23 on Lead Hazards Associated with Buildings. Current edition approved April 1, Published April Originally approved in Last previous edition approved in 2000 as E For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards volume information, refer to the standard s Document Summary page on the ASTM website. Copyright ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA , United States. 1 Copyright by ASTM Int'l (all rights reserved); Reproduction authorized per License Agreement with Timothy R. Cappel (Superior Products International II, Inc.); Mon Apr 25 16:31:31 EDT 2005

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS ASTM G20 Photos: After 180 Days: Sample #5 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #6 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #22 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #23 Exposed to 5% Urea Sample #11 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #12 Exposed to 5% Ammonia

81 VTEC # SUPERIOR PRODUCTS ASTM G20 Photos: After 180 Days: Sample #27 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #28 Exposed to 5% Ammonia Sample #17 Exposed to Diesel Sample #18 Exposed to Diesel Sample #32 Exposed to Diesel Sample #33 Exposed to Diesel

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115 LICENSED MARKS: Cradle to Cradle Certified Silver THE LICENSED MARKS IDENTIFIED ABOVE MAY BE LICENSED TO: Superior Products International II, Inc FOR THE BELOW LISTED CERTIFIED PRODUCTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE NAME: Rust Grip Only the following products are considered Certified Product(s) within the scope of this certification and the associated Trademark License Agreement: Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute Superior Products International II, Inc. Rust Grip CERTIFICATION # 2218 ISSUE DATE EXPIRATION DATE 1 December November 2015 PRIMARY ASSESSMENT BODY: MBDC Certified under Version of the Cradle to Cradle Certified Product Standard Use of Licensed Marks is subject to terms and conditions of the C2CPII Trademark License Agreement and Trademark Use Guidelines. Cradle to Cradle Certified is a certification mark licensed by the Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute

116

117 July 2, 1991 FOR UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA) FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C "FSIS DIRECTIVE 11,000.4" APPROVAL OF PAINTS AND COATINGS USED IN OFFICIAL ESTABLISHMENTS LETTER OF WRITTEN CERTIFICATION AS ACCEPTED BY USDA FROM MANUFACTURER PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION: RUST GRIP SUPPLIER'S NAME AND ADDRESS: SUPERIOR PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL II, INC W. 78th Street Shawnee, Kansas USA STATEMENT FOR FINISHED PRODUCT: RUST GRIP will not result in adulteration of food products if used and applied as stated in the supplied instructions and label directions. RUST GRIP will perform well under a daily regimen of rigorous cleaning, cyclical temperature change, and wet conditions. RUST GRIP is impervious to moisture, completely water-proof, and is not water soluble, and water has no effect on RUST GRIP even in the presence of standing water on a raw edge impervious to moisture. RUST GRIP is a light solid color (excluding flooring materials) that will not obscure detection of debris or unsanitary conditions. RUST GRIP contains no known categories of carcinogens, mutagen, or teratogens classified as hazardous substances, heavy metals, or other toxic substances, and after curing, RUST GRIP will not decompose, deteriorate, eject, emit, or otherwise exude residuals in either a liquid, solid, or gas form. RUST GRIP is not considered a pesticide and does not have pesticidal characteristics. Superior Products International II, Inc. will provide to FSIS, in a timely manner, the complete chemical composition of the materials used to manufacture RUST GRIP upon request. SIGNED: J.E. Pritchett President Superior Products International II, Inc. United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Facilities, Equipment and Sanitation Division Approval of Paints and Coatings

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142 RAILROAD OVERPASS IN DANVILLE, KENTUCKY I made contact with Mr. Ted Hopwood at the University of Kentucky that does the research for the Kentucky Dept. of Transportation. We had coated a over Railroad bridge 8 years ago. Trains operate under the bridge and the carbon deposits on the bridge had corroded the bridge structure. Prep: Power wash, Hand tool or nettle gun the pack rush areas, Solvent wipe down. Application: RUST GRIP at 200 sq.ft. (18 sq.meters) per gallon Applied by brush with two coats. First coat applied for 100 feet or 30 meters, then return and apply again to ensure correct coverage. Let dry over night. ENAMO GRIP ( customer requested grey color) Applied at 250 sq.ft. (22 sq.meters) per gallon. Sprayed on using an airless sprayer. Tip size was.016 (16/1000 inch) or 400 micron (0.4mm). Mr. Hopwood said the coating was doing an outstanding job and looked very good. The small bright spots on the surface of the ENAMO GRIP was where a pipe was removed and the anchor holes were patched using a metallic coating.

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151