Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design Marshall Method

Transcription

1 Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design Marshall Method Date: June 6, 2013 Project No: VB Mix Type/Specification: APWA RC-Type 3-01 For: Mr. Leland Smith Vance Brothers, Inc Brighton Ave. Kansas City, MO 64130

2 Asphaltic Concrete Mix Design APWA RC-Type 3-01 Objective Perform a Marshall Mix Design per the Asphalt Institute MS-2 Manual and AASHTO test methods conforming to the Kansas City Metropolitan Chapter of the American Public Works Association, 2001 Edition, APWA RC 3-01 specification (50 compaction blows per face). Materials Material Source Date Received 1/2 Crushed Limestone Quality Quarry, KCMO January 7, /8 Crushed Limestone Quality Quarry, KCMO January 7, 2013 Limestone Screenings Quality Quarry, KCMO January 7, 2013 RAP Vance Brothers, KCMO January 7, 2013 River Sand Mid America Sand Co., KCMO January 7, 2013 PG Asphalt Flint Hills Resources, Pine Bend December 6, 2012 Discussion: Mix Design Project VB The mix design was optimized using four asphalt contents (4.0, 4.5, 5.0 & 5.5% AC). The table below lists the mix properties at the optimum asphalt content chosen (4.75% AC 3.25% virgin AC). The mixing temperature range is 305 to 315 F and the compaction temperature range is 285 to 295 F. As with any mix, compaction and compaction temperatures should be determined by roller test patterns and density measurements. These test results apply only to the laboratory samples as received. Adjustments may be necessary in the plant/field due to raw material variation, conditions in the plant/field, etc. Mix design tables and graphs are on pages 2 6. Property APWA RC-Type 3-01 Specification Mix Properties Optimum AC Content (%) NA /- 0.2 Bulk Gravity of Mix (G mb ) NA Mix Density (lbs/ft 3 ) NA % Air Voids % VMA NA (AI MS-2: 14 min.) 12.2 % Voids Filled NA (AI MS-2: 65-78) 66.4 Dust Proportion NA (AI MS-2: ) 1.76 Stability (lbs) 1,500 min. 3,650 Flow (0.01") Note: NA = Not Applicable - AI MS-2 Specifications are provided for information only. Reviewed by: Date: June 6, 2013 Martin R. Burrow Technical Director, Vance Brothers Page 1 of 6

3 Project Number : VB Project Location : Vance Brothers Kansas City Date : 6/3/2013 Aggregate 1 = Quality 1/2" Aggregate 2 = Quality 3/8" Aggregate 3 = Quality Lime Material Description Aggregate 4 = MAS Asphalt Sand Aggregate 5 = Kansas City RAP Aggregate 6 = Aggregate 7 = Aggregate 8 = Enter Estimated Binder % Aggregate 9 = Estimated Mix Cost $ - Aggregate10 = Enter Nominal Maximum Size of the Mixture Enter Aggregate Material Data in this Table mm Stockpile Percentage Marshall Mix Design Program Aggr egate Cost $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Sieve Size 18% 18% 23% 11% 30% Specifications mm US Agg.1 Agg.2 Agg.3 Agg.4 Agg.5 Agg.6 Agg.7 Agg.8 Agg.9 Agg.10 Composite Min. M ax. 50 2" /2" " /4" /2" /8" # # # # # # # th POWER GRADATION CHART Percent Passing Sieve Size (mm) Page 2 of 6

4 Project Number : VB Project Location : Vance Brothers Kansas City 18% Aggr.1 = Quality 1/2" Aggr.6 = 18% Aggr.2 = Quality 3/8" Aggr.7 = Marshall Mix Design Program 23% Aggr.3 = Quality Lime Aggr.8 = 11% Aggr.4 = MAS Asphalt Sand Aggr.9 = 30% Aggr.5 = Kansas City RAP Aggr.10 = Pb 5.00% Gmm CAA Test FAA Test Spec. 1 Spec. 2 Gb Weight of 1- Frac Face sample percent 1 or more FF #DIV/0! Volume of cylinder (cm 3 ) Calculate Gse Weight of 2- Frac Face sample percent 2 or more FF #DIV/0! Wt. of cylinder (g) Calculate Pba 1.28 Total dry weight of sample Wt. of cylinder + Sample (g) Gsb of fine aggregate Gsb Coarse Sample Percent uncompacted voids #DIV/0! #DIV/0! Sand Equiv. Test Sand Rdg. Clay Rdg. S.E. Spec. # Dry Wt. Sub. Wt SSD Wt. Gsb Gsa Abs Ave. % Uncompacted Voids #DIV/0! Reading #1 ###### % Reading #2 ###### % Flat and Elongated Particles Reading #3 ###### Average % Total weight of dry sample Average ###### Gsb Fine Sample Dry wt. of elongated particles Oven Dry Flask FL+H20 % of Elong. Particles #DIV/0! G 5.00% Apshalt Binder Spec. # Sp. In Air + H 20 + Spec. Gsb Gsa Abs Specimen Sample Sample & Bowl in Sample Ave % Combined Gsb = No. in air Bowl in H 2O H20 in H20 Gmm Gmm % Combined Gsa = Average % Comb. H2O Abs. = 1.76% Data Entry SPEC. DRY SUB SSD Ave. Volumetric Data Ave. Corr. Corr. Ave. NO. Pb WT. WT. WT. Gmb Gmb Gmm Va VMA VFA Pbe DP Stab. Stab. Vol. Factor Stab Flow Flow 1A 4.0% B 4.0% % C 4.0% A 4.5% B 4.5% % C 4.5% A 5.0% B 5.0% % C 5.0% A 5.5% B 5.5% % C 5.5% A 5B 5C Page 3 of 6

5 Va VMA 6.0% 13.0 % Air Voids 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% % Voids in the Mineral Aggregate VFA DP % Voids filled with Asphalt Dust Proportion Stability Flow ASPHALT ASPHALT lbs. (N) in. (0.25 mm) Page 4 of 6

6 Page 5 of 6

7 . Page 6 of 6