Final Report. Stormwater Monitoring Program. Montage Resort & Spa Laguna Beach, California. Prepared for. Prepared by

Transcription

1 Prepared for Montage Resort & Spa Laguna Beach, California Final Report Stormwater Monitoring Program Prepared by 2556 Overland Avenue, Suite 670 Los Angeles, CA Project Number LA0123 May, 2009

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Changes to SWMP Monitoring Locations WET AND DRY WEATHER SAMPLING ACTIVITIES RESULTS AND COMPARISON TO ACTION LEVELS QA/QC OF LAB RESULTS REVIEW OF PREVIOUS SAMPLING RESULTS AUDIT ACTIVITIES BMP EFFECTIVENESS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE SWMP SUMMARY OF ANNUAL REPORTING AND RECOMMENDATIONS Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc ii May 2009

3 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Summary of Results LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Map of Monitoring Locations Figure 2: Photograph of North storm drain outfall Figure 3: Photograph of Middle storm drain outfall Figure 4: Photograph of South storm drain outfall Figure 5: Plot of copper water quality analyses Figure 6: Plot of zinc water quality analyses Figure 7: Plot of Coliform water quality analyses Figure 8: Plot of Fecal Coliform water quality analyses Figure 9: Plot of Enterococcus water quality analyses Figure 10: Plot of toxicity water quality analyses LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Summary Tables for 2004 through Monitoring Appendix B Analytical and QA/QC results Appendix C Field Monitoring Notes Appendix D Audit Field Sheets Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc iii May 2009

4 1. INTRODUCTION The Montage Resort and Spa (Montage) is located at Coast Highway in Laguna Beach, California, and is situated on the coastal bluffs adjacent to the Pacific Ocean west of Aliso Creek. The Montage resort site consists of a combination of public open space (12.5 acres) and private resort development (17.5 acres). A Stormwater Monitoring Plan (SWMP) was developed with recommendations and requirements from the San Diego Water Quality Control Board and the California Coastal Commission (CCC). The SWMP covers conditions and requirements established as part of the project planning and permitting processes, and was revised in consultation with CCC staff in 2007 and The specific objectives of the SWMP are: 1) To provide stormwater runoff quality information for three storm drain outfalls, at the surfzone, to evaluate the effectiveness of the Montage s water quality management measures. Water quality management measures at the Montage site include both structural and non-structural BMPs. Structural BMPs include Continuous Deflective Separation (CDS) units and dry weather flow diversions (directing runoff to the sewer system) located at each of the three outfalls, and 15 storm drain inlet filters located throughout the hotel drainage area. Non-structural BMPs include regular maintenance of the structural BMPs and good-housekeeping practices throughout the facility. 2) To supplement the information from the Montage Resort s 5-year Marine Resource Monitoring Program. 3) To provide the CCC and City of Laguna Beach (City) with annual status reports and a final monitoring report summarizing the results and recommendations from the program. This report is the final annual report and covers the monitoring season (July to June). In addition, this report consists of a review and assessment of monitoring results and recommendations from previous years. A site audit was also performed on December 4, 2008 to assess housekeeping practices and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) that are specifically implemented for bacteria source control. This audit was requested by CCC staff in response to elevated bacteria Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 1 May 2009

5 concentrations that were previously reported for stormwater discharge and surfzone samples during wet weather. 1.1 Changes to SWMP Based on review and approval from CCC staff Carrie Bluth, as well as City staff Will Holoman, the following minor changes and clarifications to the SWMP were made in 2007: Removal of radioactivity from the required list of SWMP analysis parameters; Quality Control samples (including field blanks and field duplicate samples) to be required during only one sampling event per year (a wet event); Toxicity tests to be limited to 3 dilutions per site (previously not specified in the SWMP), in addition to the control sample analyses i.e., chronic tests will be run for the 100% undiluted sample, and if necessary, 25% and 50% samples as well; and ph and conductivity tests to be conducted in the lab as opposed to in the field (field logs will include sample time/date, sampler name, temperature, and visual observations). Wet weather monitoring during the and rainy seasons only consisted of a single storm event each year, rather than two as required by the revised SWMP. This was caused by relatively dry rainy seasons that resulted in below average number of discharge events. In consultation with the City and CCC staff, a final round of sampling events was agreed to for the monitoring season, including a site audit to assess non-structural BMP implementation. This final sampling and audit program is as follows: Continue both dry weather (1 sample event) and wet weather (2 sample events) monitoring at the same surfzone locations for one additional year with the following modifications to the Monitoring Plan: 1. Wet weather samples should be collected 24 to 48 hours after cessation of a target, or discharge-producing, storm event. 2. Analyses to include only those priority constituents as determined from past monitoring results (i.e., Enterococcus and other fecal indicator bacteria, total metals, and chronic and acute toxicity). Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 2 May 2009

6 3. An appropriate marine (not estuarine) species should be utilized for toxicity testing. Topsmelt was selected to replace mysid shrimp for this purpose. Conduct a visual and information seeking audit of the site to identify any potential sources of bacteria possibly contributing to wet weather concentrations in the surfzone at the outfalls. For example, inspection of trash management facilities and activities, resort grounds (for sources of litter or animal waste), and landscaping maintenance practices (e.g., fertilizer application amounts). The new wet weather sample collection time for (24 to 48 hours after cessation of a target storm) is a change from the previous two years of wet weather sampling that occurred during discharges from the target storm events. 1.2 Monitoring Locations The Montage site has three main storm drain lines that discharge to the Pacific Ocean, designated North, Middle, and South (Figure 1). The North and Middle drains (owned and operated by Montage) receive drainage from both the public open space and private resort areas. The South drain (owned and operated by the City of Laguna Beach) receives drainage from approximately 63 acres of off-site drainage located north of the South Coast Highway, plus a small area of the Resort. Figure 1 shows the total drainage area tributary to the three monitored outfalls. Figures 2, 3 and 4 are photographs of the North, Middle and South outfalls, respectively, each located at the base of the cliff. As shown, sand often builds up near the cliff, effectively burying each outfall, until wet weather conditions build up sufficient hydrostatic head and scour velocities in the discharge to blow-out the sand barrier and create a channel to the Ocean. The sample locations, as defined in the SWMP, are in the surfzone where the storm drain discharges initially mix with ocean water. In the case of dry weather, sampling is conducted in the surfzone at approximately these same locations. Dry weather monitoring data are used for comparison purposes, and to establish background surfzone water quality conditions. This final stormwater annual status report summarizes results of monitoring at the three storm drain discharge locations in addition to review and comparison with results from previous annual reports. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 3 May 2009

7 LEGEND Surf zone sampling location Storm drain outfall, CDS unit, diversion to sewer 63 ac Offsite Drainage Area North Middle 30 ac Montage Resort and Public areas South Figure 1. Aerial photograph of the Montage Resort marked with sampling locations. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 4 May 2009

8 Figure 2. Photograph of the North storm drain outfall. Figure 3. Photograph of the Middle storm drain outfall. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 5 May 2009

9 Figure 4. Photograph of the South storm drain outfall. 2. DRY AND WET WEATHER SAMPLING ACTIVITIES The Montage SWMP calls for surfzone sampling during one dry and two wet weather events each year between July of one summer and June of the next, depending on timing and size of storms. As part of the monitoring season, the dry weather sampling event occurred on October 23, 2008, and the wet weather sampling events occurred on December 17, 2008 and February 18, At the instruction of the CCC, this year s wet weather sampling events were to occur 24 to 48 hours after the end of the targeted, discharge-producing storms. All three outfall monitoring locations were noted to be dry during the October 23, 2008 dry weather sampling event (see observation logs included in Appendix C). The total precipitation for the rain season (October through March) was measured as 9.5 inches based on the Santa Ana Fire Station rain gauge or 8.4 inches based on the Costa Mesa Water District rain gauge. Both of these results are below the annual rainfall averages for these stations, or approximately 13 inches. The storm prior to the December 17, 2008 sampling event was 1.3 inches, and the storm prior to the February 18, 2009 sampling event was 0.12 inches for the previous 24 hour period (0.72 inches for the previous 72 hours), based on the Costa Mesa rain gauge. For both wet weather sampling events (which occurred after rainfall stopped) the outfalls were no longer discharging, with the exception of the South storm drain on February 18 when Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 6 May 2009

10 there was just a trickle of flow that did not pond. Observation logs for these sampling events are provided in Appendix C RESULTS AND COMPARISON TO ACTION LEVELS Table 1 summarizes the lab results for the dry and wet weather monitoring events. The full lab reports are included in Appendix B. The two wet weather (or more accurately, post-wet weather) acute toxicity results, based on topsmelt survival, for the South outfall were the only exceedances of the revised SWMP Threshold Action Limits (TALs) for the monitoring season. Chronic toxicity, based on silverside and topsmelt larvae survival and growth, was not observed at any outfall for any of the sampling events, and all trace metals and fecal indicator bacteria results were more than an order of magnitude below the TALs. Regarding the two wet weather acute toxicity TAL exceedances at the South outfall, this storm drain receives runoff from 63 offsite acres northeast of Hwy 1, and includes urban (single family residential and commercial) land uses. Urban land uses are known to generate low levels of pollutants such as trace metals and organophosphate pesticides that may cause or contribute to aquatic toxicity, and so this is a possible explanation for the observations (Anderson, Ogle, and Lowe, 2003) 1. However, the recent wet weather acute toxicity results are the lowest wet weather results since the monitoring program began in This is likely in part due to the 2006 transition from raw discharge to diluted surfzone sampling, in addition to the 2008 transition to wet weather sampling after cessation of the runoff-producing storm events. Water quality results for the South outfall were generally poorest for all constituents analyzed, indicating possibly that, over time, the Montage Resort drainage areas have contributed lower pollutant loads to the surfzone sampling areas than the offsite-draining South outfall. Fecal indicator bacteria results for both dry and wet weather sampling were well below the TALs and at their lowest wet weather levels since the monitoring program began. Surfzone monitoring programs throughout Southern California have reported elevated and highly variable fecal indicator bacteria -- Enterococcus in particular -- concentrations, however Enterococcus results were non-detect for all three Ten years of testing for the effects of Estuary contamination in the 2003 Pulse of the Estuary; San Francisco Estuary Institute, Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 7 May 2009

11 sample events at all three outfall locations. Previous annual reports have indicated Enterococcus commonly exceeded the TALs during wet weather. These recent results demonstrate that water quality especially bacterial in the surfzone near the Montage site rebounds quickly (or within 1 to 2 days) after stormwater discharges have ceased. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 8 May 2009

12 Table 1 Montage Resort & Spa Stormwater Monitoring Report, Monitoring Season Dry Weather Sample October 23, 2008 Wet Weather Sample December 17, 2008 Wet Weather Sample February 18, 2009 Parameters Units RL MDL Threshold Action Limits South Middle North South Middle North South Middle North Arsenic, total ug/l Cadmium, total ug/l Chromium, total ug/l Copper, total ug/l Lead, total ug/l Mercury, total ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.01J Nickel, total ug/l Selenium, total ug/l ND ND ND J 0.01J Silver, total ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND Zinc, total ug/l ND Coliform MPN/100ml ,000 ND ND ND ND Fecal Coliform MPN/100ml ND ND ND ND ND 20 ND Enterococcus MPN/100ml ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Chronic Toxicity (Survival, topsmelt larvae) TUc Chronic Toxicity (Growth, topsmelt larvae) TUc Acute Toxicity (Survival, topsmelt) TUa Results in bold underline indicate analyses above action threshold level. RL/MDL = Reporting Limit; Method Detection Limit J = Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit, but above the laboratory method detection limit. The result is estimated. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 9 May 2009

13 4. QA/QC OF LAB RESULTS The laboratory Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) results are included with the laboratory analysis results in Appendix B. The wet weather results for all constituents in the SWMP pass all accuracy and precision tests with the following exceptions: 1) zinc relative percent difference result for R1/R2 (i.e., replicates 1 and 2) failed the precision test for the December 17, 2008 sample event because the results were less than ten times the method detection limit; 2) iron relative percent difference result was out of control due to sample heterogeneity for the December 17, 2008 analysis; and 3) the chromium and zinc relative percent difference for R1/R2 analyses for the February 18, 2009 sample failed. The dry weather lab results pass all accuracy and precision tests. 5. REVIEW OF PREVIOUS SAMPLING RESULTS The original SWMP required raw discharge sampling (i.e., collected at the stormdrain outlet, not in the surfzone) during both dry and wet weather, whereas the current revised SWMP requires surfzone sampling. Therefore, starting with the December 2006 dry weather sample event, surfzone samples have been collected. For this reason wet weather results prior to 2006 cannot be easily compared with post-2006 results. Furthermore, the previous monitoring contractor, prior to December 2006, implemented the original dry weather discharge sampling requirement (when there are no discharges from the storm drains) by collecting sand samples at the drain outfalls; therefore these previous (sand) results are not comparable with recent results for dry weather surfzone (water) samples, and have not been plotted on the accompanying figures. Finally, a most recent change for the monitoring season was the requirement that wet weather samples be collected 24 to 48 hours after the end of the target storm event in contrast to all previous wet weather sampling which occurred during discharge from the target storm event. Time-series charts of copper, zinc, Coliform, Fecal Coliform, and Enterococcus concentrations, and Acute toxicity are included to illustrate variations and trends over the history of the stormwater monitoring program for the three monitoring locations (Figures 5 through 10). These constituents were chosen because of prior results that exceeded TALs. Other metals are routinely below TALs or are non-detect. Reported concentrations from 2004 through (see summarized data in Appendix A) were higher, and with more frequent TAL exceedances, than those reported in through , however these older results reflect samples Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 10 May 2009

14 of raw stormwater discharge rather than the surfzone where some mixing and dilution occurs. The through water quality results for both dry weather and wet weather are comparable, with concentrations of copper, zinc, Coliform, and Fecal Coliform consistently below TALs (Figures 5 through 8). Enterococcus wet weather results were variable for the previous two monitoring seasons ( and ) with two different sample locations returning results that were above the TALs (Figure 9). Enterococcus wet weather and dry weather results for the sampling events were all non-detect. Enterococcus dry weather results for all previous years were well below TALs for all sample locations. These results indicate that fecal indicator bacteria exceedances generally occur only during wet weather discharge periods, and in particular near the South outfall where a larger urban drainage area discharges. Acute toxicity results over the years 2004 through 2009 show improvement, although this is most likely due to the modified monitoring locations (i.e., from raw runoff to surfzone sampling), as well as possibly due to the transition of test species from mysid shrimp to topsmelt in The past three seasons, in which samples were collected from the surfzone, have resulted in four (4) of nine (9) dry weather acute toxicity results above the TALs indicating a baseline or background level of acute toxicity for these surfzone samples that is not associated with stormwater. Wet weather sampling has resulted in five (5) of ten (10) wet weather acute toxicity results above the TALs (Figure 10). Given these limited wet versus dry weather historic results, it seems that wet weather discharges may not significantly elevate background acute toxicity in the surfzone near these outfalls. Finally, no chronic toxicity has been observed during the history of this stormwater/surfzone monitoring program. 6. AUDIT ACTIVITIES An audit of source control or non-structural BMPs occurred on December 4, 2008 at the Montage Resort and Spa in Laguna Beach, CA with a focus on bacteria source control practices. Appendix D contains field data sheets from that audit. To maintain the integrity of the audit, details regarding the specific intent of the inspection were not provided to the resort staff prior to the site visit. The Geosyntec inspection team was given unlimited access to all resort facilities (interior and exterior) and key staff members participated in interviews regarding facility management practices. Photographs were taken and an inspection checklist was completed on-site, which included categories such as equipment/outdoor cleaning, animal waste management, education/training, and trash management. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 11 May 2009

15 Upon inspection, the Resort was found to be very well maintained and actively implementing bacteria prevention practices on a regular basis. For example, no dry weather discharge to the Ocean was observed, pet waste bag stations were provided for public and guests, employees were well trained in fertilizer/pest management and irrigation optimization, the majority of all trash cans were covered, there was a designated equipment wash station that discharged directly to the sewer, and regular maintenance of the CDS units and drain inlet filters was being implemented. Potential areas of improvement included increasing the number of pet waste stations (particularly near the southern bus stop), labeling storm drain inlets, covering all trash cans including those with ash trays, rerouting an observed dripping laundry steam pipe to a planter box, a landscaped area, or to the sanitary sewer, and adding signage to encourage cleanliness near the loading dock. After the audit was completed, observations and potential areas of improvement were discussed with facilities management staff, who were receptive to implementing these recommendations. 7. BMP EFFECTIVENESS PERFORMANCE The sampling occurred at different locations (e.g., raw stormwater or dry weather beach sand as opposed to surfzone sampling at the point of initial mixing) and in the case of dry weather used a different sampling protocol (i.e., sand vs. water sampling), therefore no rigorous quantitative comparison can be conducted between the sample results and those collected for With respect to metals and other sediment-related 2 water quality parameters, concentrations in the surfzone near the three stormwater outfalls during wet periods were all well below TALs, and by that measure -- combined with the basic fact that trash and debris are regularly removed from the devices and therefore prevented from reaching the beach and Ocean -- the CDS units and drain inlet filters at the site appear to be well maintained and performing as designed. Enterococcus bacteria TALs were exceeded during wet weather conditions for and , but for the most recent (post) wet weather sampling ( ) all bacteria analyses including Enterococcus were well below the TALs. Finally, dry weather observations and water quality results indicate that the dry weather diversion are also performing as designed by preventing dry weather discharges to the Ocean. 2 It is noted that the structural treatment control measures implemented at the site are capable of providing partial removal of trash, organic litter and debris, coarse sediments, and sediment-associated pollutants, as opposed to dissolved-phase pollutants. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 12 May 2009

16 8. EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE SWMP During the monitoring season, the Montage stormwater monitoring program was in compliance with the SWMP requirements to conduct one dry weather and two wet weather surfzone monitoring events, to conduct regular inspection and maintenance of the structural BMPs located on site, and to conduct a visual and information-seeking audit of potential bacterial sources that may contribute to elevated wet weather surfzone results. This monitoring season and annual report represents completion of the SWMP, with all monitoring requirements having been met. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 13 May 2009

17 Drain outfall sampled South - Dry Weather Middle - Dry Weather North - Dry Weather South - Wet Weather Middle - Wet Weather North - Wet Weather Copper (ug/l) Surfzone sampled 40 Threshold Limit 20 0 Aug-04 Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Figure 5. Plot of copper water quality analyses from 2004 through TALs for copper were set in the December 2005 SWMP. 350 South - Dry Weather Drain outfall sampled Middle - Dry Weather North - Dry Weather South - Wet Weather Middle - Wet Weather North - Wet Weather Zinc (ug/l) Threshold Limit 100 Surfzone sampled 50 0 Aug-04 Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Figure 6. Plot of zinc water quality analyses from 2004 through Zinc TALs were set in the December 2005 SWMP. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 14 May 2009

18 10,000,000 1,000, ,000 Drain outfall sampled South - Wet Weather Middle - Wet Weather North - Wet Weather South - Dry Weather Middle - Dry Weather North - Dry Weather Coliform (MPN/100L) 10,000 1, Surfzone sampled Threshold Limit 10 1 Aug-04 Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Figure 7. Plot of Coliform water quality analyses from 2004 through Coliform TALs were set in the December 2005 SWMP. 1,000, ,000 Drain outfall sampled South - Wet Weather Middle - Wet Weather North - Wet Weather South - Dry Weather Middle - Dry Weather North - Dry Weather 10,000 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100 L) 1, Surfzone sampled Threshold Limit 1 Aug-04 Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Figure 8. Plot of Fecal Coliform water quality analyses from 2004 through Fecal Coliform TALs were set in the December 2005 SWMP. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 15 May 2009

19 10,000 South - Wet Weather Middle - Wet Weather North - Wet Weather South - Dry Weather 1,000 Middle - Dry Weather Enterococcus (MPN/100 L) 100 North - Dry Weather Drain outfall sampled Threshold Limit Surfzone sampled 10 1 Jan-04 Jul-04 Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jun-08 Dec-08 Figure 9. Plot of Enterococcus water quality analyses from 2004 through Enterococcus TALs were set in the December 2005 SWMP. Toxicity (acute toxicity units) Drain outfall sampled 10/17/05 N TUa = 0.0 >1.0>1.0 >1.0 >1.0 >1.0 >1.0 >1.0 >1.0 Surfzone sampled 8/30/07 S TUa = 0.0 8/30/07 N TUa = /30/07 N TUa = 0.0 Wet Weather - South Wet Weather - Middle Wet Weather - North Dry Weather - South Dry Weather - Middle Dry Weather - North 12/17/08 M & N TUa = /18/09 M & N TUa = /03/08 S, M & N TUa = 0.0 0% % Survival /19/04 10/27/04 10/17/05 12/31/05 2/28/06 12/08/06 4/20/07 8/30/07 11/30/07 10/03/08 12/17/08 02/18/09 100% Figure 10. Plot of Acute Toxicity water quality analyses from 2004 through TALs for acute toxicity were set in the December 2005 SWMP. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 16 May 2009

20 9. SUMMARY OF ANNUAL REPORTING AND RECOMMENDATIONS After three years of sampling using consistent sampling locations (i.e., surfzone as opposed to raw discharge) for both dry and wet weather monitoring at the Montage Resort and Spa, results indicate that water quality in the surfzone is generally good with metal concentrations consistently well below TALs and fecal indicator bacteria results generally below TALs, except during stormwater discharge periods. Toxicity results, particularly for the most recent monitoring results, confirm that toxicity is generally low for both wet and dry weather surfzone samples. While chronic toxicity has not been observed, acute toxicity has been during both dry and wet periods, although recently only at the South outfall, which drains 63 acres of offsite urban area. Because acute toxicity has been observed in both dry and wet weather samples it is unclear to what extent discharges from the stormdrain outfalls are responsible. Continued good housekeeping practices and regular inspection and maintenance of the on-site structural BMP units, along with the incorporation of suggested improvements from the bacterial source audit will most likely result in consistently good, if not improved, water quality. This completes the monitoring and reporting requirements of the revised SWMP. Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc 17 May 2009

21 APPENDIX A Montage Resort and Spa Summary Tables for Water Quality Monitoring Results Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc May, 2009

22 Montage Resort & Spa Wet Weather Stormwater Monitoring Report 2004 Stormwater Drain Samples Wet Weather Sample October 19, 2004 Wet Weather Sample October 27, 2005 Parameters Units South Middle North South Middle North Arsenic Cadmium ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND Chromium ug/l 6.5 ND ND ND ND ND Chromium (Hexavalent) ug/l Copper ug/l Lead ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND Mercury ug/l Nickel ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND Selenium ug/l Silver ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND Zinc ug/l Cyanide (total) mg/l Chlorine (Residual) mg/l Phenolic Compounds (Non- Chlorinated) ug/l Phenolic Compounds (Chlorinated) ug/l Endulsulfan ug/l Endrin ug/l HCH ug/l Oil and Grease mg/l ND ND Suspended Solids mg/l ph ph units Turbidity NTU Settleable Solids ml/l/hr Specific Conductance uhmos/cm Ammonia (as N) mg/l Nitrate (as N) mg/l Phosphorous (as P) mg/l Orthophosphate (as P) mg/l Coliforms CFU100ml 1,900,000 2,400, , ,000 24,000 1,200 Fecal Coliforms CFU/100ml 150, ,000 16,000 3, Enterococcus CFU/100ml Chronic Toxicity (Survival) TUc Chronic Toxicity (Growth) TUc Acute Toxicity (Mysidopsis Bahia) TUa >1.0 >1.0 > >1.0 Results in bold underline indicate analyses above action threshold level; FDS = Field Duplicate Sample

23 Montage Resort & Spa Stormwater Monitoring Dry Weather Sand Samples Dry (Sand) Weather Sample August 9, 2005 Dry (Sand) Weather Sample September 11, 2006 Parameters Units RL South Drain Middle Drain North Drain South Drain South Surfline Middle Drain Middle Surfline North Drain North Surfline Arsenic mg/kg ND ND ND ND 1.90 ND Cadmium mg/kg 0.51 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Chromium mg/kg Chromium (Hexavalent) mg/kg ND ND ND ND ND ND Copper mg/kg 2.2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 4 ND Lead mg/kg 1.3 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Mercury mg/kg ND ND ND ND ND ND Nickel mg/kg Selenium mg/kg ND ND ND ND ND ND Silver mg/kg 0.8 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Zinc mg/kg ND 5.1 ND 3.8 ND Cyanide (total) mg/kg ND ND ND ND ND ND Chlorine (Residual) mg/kg Phenolic Compounds (Non- Chlorinated) ug/kg 5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Phenolic Compounds (Chlorinated) ug/kg 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Endulsulfan ug/l 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Endrin ug/l 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND HCH ug/l 1 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Oil and Grease mg/l ND ND ND ND ND ND Suspended Solids mg/l ph ph units Turbidity NTU Settleable Solids ml/l/hr Specific Conductance uhmos/cm Ammonia (as N) mg/kg Nitrate (as N) mg/kg Orthophosphate (as P) mg/kg Coliforms CFU100ml 20 ND ND ND ,000 4,100 10,000 1, Fecal Coliforms CFU/100ml 20 ND ND ND Enterococcus CFU/100ml Chronic Toxicity (Survival) TUc Chronic Toxicity (Growth) TUc Acute Toxicity (Mysidopsis Bahia) TUa

24 Montage Resort & Spa Wet Weather Stormwater Monitoring Report Stormwater Drain Samples Wet Weather Sample October 17, 2005 December 31, 2005 Wet Weather Sample February 28, 2006 Parameters Units RL Instantaneous Maximum Limit South Middle North South RL South Middle North Arsenic ND Cadmium ug/l ND ND ND ND 10 ND ND ND Chromium ug/l ND ND ND ND Chromium (Hexavalent) ug/l ND ND ND Copper ug/l ND ND ND Lead ug/l ND ND ND ND 40 ND ND ND Mercury ug/l ND ND ND Nickel ug/l 9 50 ND ND 100 ND ND ND Selenium ug/l ND Silver ug/l ND ND ND ND 100 ND ND ND Zinc ug/l ND ND ND Cyanide (total) mg/l ND ND ND Chlorine (Residual) mg/l ND ND ND Phenolic Compounds (Non- Chlorinated) ug/l ND ND ND Phenolic Compounds (Chlorinated) ug/l ND ND ND Endulsulfan ug/l ND ND ND Endrin ug/l ND ND ND HCH ug/l ND ND ND Oil and Grease mg/l ND ND 1.2 Suspended Solids mg/l ph ph units Turbidity NTU Settleable Solids ml/l/hr Specific Conductance uhmos/cm 0.1 5, ,220 1, Ammonia (as N) mg/l Nitrate (as N) mg/l Phosphorous (as P) mg/l Orthophosphate (as P) mg/l Coliforms CFU100ml 1 10, , ,000 2,100 47, , Fecal Coliforms CFU/100ml ,000 11, , Enterococcus CFU/100ml , Chronic Toxicity (Survival) TUc Chronic Toxicity (Growth) TUc Acute Toxicity (Mysidopsis Bahia) TUa >1.0 >1.0 >1.0 Results in bold underline indicate analyses above action threshold level; FDS = Field Duplicate Sample J = Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit, but above the laboratory method detection limit. The result is estimated.

25 Montage Resort & Spa Stormwater Monitoring Report Dry Weather Sample December 8, 2006 Wet Weather Sample April 20, 2007 Parameters Units RL MDL Instantaneous Maximum Limit South Middle North South Middle FDS Middle FDS % Difference Arsenic ug/l Cadmium ug/l Chromium (hexavalent) ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Copper ug/l Lead ug/l Mercury ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Nickel ug/l Selenium ug/l Silver ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Zinc ug/l Cyanide (total) ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Chlorine (Residual) ug/l J ND 17.0 ND ND ND -- Phenolic Compounds (Non- Chlorinated) ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Phenolic Compounds (Chlorinated) ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Endulsulfan ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Endrin ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND -- HCH ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Oil and Grease mg/l J 1.1J ND 3.5J 1.3J 2.7J 52 Suspended Solids mg/l J 4.8J ph ph units Turbidity NTU J 1J 1J Settleable Solids ml/l/hr ND ND Specific Conductance uhmos/cm , Ammonia (as N) mg/l J 0.02J 0.02J 0.33 ND 0.01J -- Nitrate (as N) mg/l J ND ND Phosphate (as P, total) mg/l ND ND Coliforms MPN/100ml ,000 ND ND ND 5, Fecal Coliforms MPN/100ml ND ND ND Enerococcus MPN/100ml ND ND ND 1, Chronoic Toxicity (Survival) TUc Chronoic Toxicity (Growth) TUc Acute Toxicity TUa Results in bold underline indicate analyses above action threshold level; FDS = Field Duplicate Sample J = Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit, but above the laboratory method detection limit. The result is estimated.

26 Parameters Units RL MDL Montage Resort & Spa Stormwater Monitoring Report Instantaneous Maximum Limit Dry Weather Sample August 30, 2007 Wet Weather Sample November 30, 2007 South Middle North South Middle North Middle FDS Wet Weather Field Duplicate Sample FDS % Difference Arsenic ug/l Cadmium ug/l >100 Chromium (hexavalent) ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Copper ug/l >100 Lead ug/l >100 Mercury ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Nickel ug/l >100 Selenium ug/l J 0.01 J 0.01 J >100 Silver ug/l ND ND ND ND -- Zinc ug/l >100 Cyanide (total) mg/l ND ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Chlorine (Residual) mg/l ND ND ND >100 Phenolic Compounds (Non- Chlorinated) ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND J Phenolic Compounds (Chlorinated) ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Endulsulfan ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Endrin ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND ND -- HCH ug/l ND ND ND ND ND ND ND -- Oil and Grease mg/l ND ND ND ND ND ND Suspended Solids mg/l J 1.3 J 1.5 J 0.7 ND >100 ph ph units >100 Turbidity NTU ND ND ND >100 Settleable Solids ml/l/hr ND ND ND ND -- Specific Conductance uhmos/cm , Ammonia (as N) mg/l ND ND ND 0.01 ND ND Nitrate (as N) mg/l J J J ND ND ND Phosphate (as P, total) mg/l >100 Coliforms MPN/100ml ,000 ND ND ND 1,700 2, ,000 >100 Fecal Coliforms MPN/100ml ND ND ND ,000 >100 Enerococcus MPN/100ml ND ND ND 288 1, ,187 >100 Chronoic Toxicity (Survival) TUc Chronoic Toxicity (Growth) TUc Acute Toxicity TUa Results in bold underline indicate analyses above action threshold level; FDS = Field Duplicate Sample RL/MDL = Reporting Limit; Method Detection Limit J = Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit, but above the laboratory method detection limit. The result is es

27 APPENDIX B Montage Resort and Spa Water Quality Monitoring Results Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc May, 2009

28 November 18, 2008 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. "A Center for Excellence in Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Microbiology" Geosyntec Consultants 924 Anacapa Street Suite 4A Santa Barbara, CA Re: CRG Marine Laboratories Geosyntec Consultants Project ID: GEO008 Project ID: Montage Surfzone Monitoring ATTN: Brandon Steets CRG Laboratories is pleased to provide you with the enclosed analytical data report for your Montage Surfzone Monitoring project. According to the chain-of-custody, 3 samples were received intact at CRG on 10/23/2008. Per your instructions, the samples were analyzed for: Trace Metals By ICPMS Using Method Mercury (Hg) By CVAFS Using Method EPA 245.7m Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions and thank you very much for using our laboratory for your analytical needs. Regards, Rhonda Moeller Reviewed and Approved 2020 Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) crglabs@sbcglobal.net

29 Project Sample List Geosyntec Consultants CRG Project ID: GEO008 Project Officer: Brandon Steets Project Description: Montage Surfzone Monitoring CRG Sample ID# Client Sample ID Sample Description Date Sampled Matrix North 23-Oct-08 Seawater Middle 23-Oct-08 Seawater South 23-Oct-08 Seawater

30 CRG s QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY BATCH: CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document defines a batch as a group of 20 or fewer samples of similar matrix, processed together under the same conditions and with the same reagents. Quality control samples are associated with each batch and are used to assess the validity of the sample analyses. CRG typically uses batch sizes of samples. PROCEDURAL BLANKS: Laboratory contamination was controlled through the analysis of procedural blanks on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that all procedural blanks be below 10 times the MDL and all detectable constituents in the blanks be flagged in the sample results. The Procedural Blanks are presented in the Procedural Blank section of this report. ACCURACY: Accuracy of the project data was indicated by analysis of matrix spikes (MS/MSD), surrogate spikes, certified reference materials, positive controls, and/or laboratory control materials on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that 95% of the target compounds greater than 10 times the MDL be within the specified acceptance limits. The Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Accuracy Data section of this report. PRECISION: Precision of the project data was determined by analysis of duplicate matrix spikes, blank spikes, and/or duplicate test sample analysis on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that for 95% of the compounds >10 times the MDL, the % Relative Percent Difference (%RPD) should be within the specified acceptance range. The %RPD for the duplicate test sample analysis can be significantly affected by the homogeneity of the sample matrix within the sample container itself causing additional variability in the analytical results. In these cases, the QA/QC Acceptance Limits may be exceeded. The %RPD and Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Precision Data section of this report. TOTAL/DISSOLVED: In some instances, the results for the Dissolved fraction can be higher than the fraction for a particular parameter. This is typically caused by the analytical variation for each result and indicates that the target parameter is primarily in the dissolved phase. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Qualifier B E H J M1 M2 M3 M4 Definition Analyte was detected in the associated method blank. Analyte concentration exceeds the calibration range Sample received and/or analyzed past the recommended holding time. Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is estimated. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to matrix interference. The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. Detection of the analyte was difficult due to matrix interference. Spike or surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank spike or surrogate compound was in control and therefore the sample data was reported without further clarification.

31 M5 M6 ND or U NES Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to an unknown compound(s) in the sample that interferes with the known target compound causing an increased response. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to unknown heavy hydrocarbons detected in the sample which elevates the baseline. Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit. Not enough sample. Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike concentration. The sample RPD was out of control. Sample is heterogeneous and sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved using routine laboratory practices. RPD values are not accurate and not applicable because the results for R1 and/or R2 are lower than 10 times the MDL. Due to the sample rate of the instrument, the peak area was underestimated because the apex of the peak was missed. This random error has caused this compound to fail for the spike and/or precision. This failure does not indicate any significant problems with the analysis of this sample and the data passes CRG s QAPP requirements. Precision failed due to one of the sample extractions having lower recoveries than the duplicate. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document allows for 5% of the target compounds greater than 10 times the MDL to be outside the specified acceptance limits for precision and/or accuracy. This is often due to random error and cannot be attributed to a specific issue.

32 Qualifier Summary for GEO008 Trace Metals Sample ID Client Sample ID Qualifier Parameter R2 North J Cobalt (Co) Page 1 of 1

33 DATA REPORT

34 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code R1 North Seawater Sampled: 23-Oct-08 13:10 Received: 23-Oct-08 Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) ND ND µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /5/ /5/2008 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Tin (Sn) Titanium (Ti) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) ND ND ND ND µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ R1 Middle Seawater Sampled: 23-Oct-08 14:00 Received: 23-Oct-08 Aluminum (Al) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Antimony (Sb) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Arsenic (As) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 GEO008 Montage Surfzone Monitoring

35 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) ND µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Manganese (Mn) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /5/ /5/2008 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Tin (Sn) Titanium (Ti) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) ND ND ND ND µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ µg/l /4/ /6/ R1 South Seawater Sampled: 23-Oct-08 14:45 Received: 23-Oct-08 Aluminum (Al) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Antimony (Sb) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Arsenic (As) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Cadmium (Cd) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Chromium (Cr) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Cobalt (Co) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Copper (Cu) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 GEO008 Montage Surfzone Monitoring

36 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Iron (Fe) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Lead (Pb) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Manganese (Mn) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /5/ /5/2008 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Nickel (Ni) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Selenium (Se) ND µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Silver (Ag) ND µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Thallium (Tl) ND µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Tin (Sn) ND µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Titanium (Ti) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Vanadium (V) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 Zinc (Zn) µg/l /4/ /6/2008 GEO008 Montage Surfzone Monitoring

37 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

38 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code QAQC Procedural Blank Lab Blank B1 DI Water Aluminum (Al) ND 3 6 µg/l Antimony (Sb) ND µg/l Arsenic (As) ND µg/l Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l Cadmium (Cd) ND µg/l Chromium (Cr) ND µg/l Cobalt (Co) ND µg/l Copper (Cu) ND µg/l Iron (Fe) ND µg/l Lead (Pb) ND µg/l Manganese (Mn) ND µg/l Mercury (Hg) 5034 ND µg/l Molybdenum (Mo) ND µg/l Nickel (Ni) ND µg/l Selenium (Se) ND µg/l Silver (Ag) ND µg/l Thallium (Tl) ND µg/l Tin (Sn) ND µg/l Titanium (Ti) ND µg/l Vanadium (V) ND µg/l Zinc (Zn) ND µg/l Prepared 11/4/2008 Analyzed 06-Nov-08 North Prepared 11/4/2008 Analyzed 06-Nov-08 Matrix Spike MS1 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l % PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l % PASS GEO008 Montage Surfzone Monitoring

39 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Arsenic (As) µg/l % PASS Beryllium (Be) µg/l % PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l % PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l % PASS Cobalt (Co) µg/l % PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l % PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l % PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l % PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l % PASS Mercury (Hg) µg/l % PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l % PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l % PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l % PASS Silver (Ag) µg/l % PASS Thallium (Tl) µg/l % PASS Tin (Sn) µg/l % PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l % PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l % PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l % PASS North Prepared 11/4/2008 Analyzed 06-Nov-08 Matrix Spike Dup MS2 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l % PASS PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Arsenic (As) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Beryllium (Be) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l % PASS 2 30 PASS GEO008 Montage Surfzone Monitoring

40 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail Cobalt (Co) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l % PASS 2 30 PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Mercury (Hg) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l % PASS 4 30 PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l % PASS 2 30 PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Silver (Ag) µg/l % PASS 6 30 PASS Thallium (Tl) µg/l % PASS 7 30 PASS Tin (Sn) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l % PASS 2 30 PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code North Prepared 11/4/2008 Analyzed 06-Nov-08 Lab Dup R2 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l 0 30 PASS Arsenic (As) µg/l PASS Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l 6 30 PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l 6 30 PASS Cobalt (Co) µg/l 0 30 PASS J Copper (Cu) µg/l PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l 6 30 PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l 0 30 PASS GEO008 Montage Surfzone Monitoring

41 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Source % Acceptance Limit RPD RPD Limit QA Level Result Recovery Limits Pass/Fail LIMIT Pass/Fail Code Manganese (Mn) µg/l 4 30 PASS Mercury (Hg) 5034 ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l 1 30 PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l 6 30 PASS Selenium (Se) ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Silver (Ag) ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Thallium (Tl) ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Tin (Sn) ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l 6 30 PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l 2 30 PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l FAIL QAQC LCM-CRG Seawater Lab Control Mate LCM1 Seawater Aluminum (Al) ND 3 6 µg/l Antimony (Sb) µg/l Arsenic (As) µg/l Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l Cadmium (Cd) µg/l Chromium (Cr) µg/l Cobalt (Co) µg/l Copper (Cu) µg/l Iron (Fe) ND µg/l Lead (Pb) µg/l Manganese (Mn) µg/l Mercury (Hg) 5034 ND µg/l Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l Nickel (Ni) µg/l Prepared 11/4/2008 Analyzed 06-Nov-08 GEO008 Montage Surfzone Monitoring

42 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Selenium (Se) µg/l Silver (Ag) µg/l Thallium (Tl) ND µg/l Tin (Sn) ND µg/l Titanium (Ti) ND µg/l Vanadium (V) µg/l Zinc (Zn) ND µg/l QAQC LCM-CRG Seawater Prepared 11/4/2008 Analyzed 06-Nov-08 Lab Control Spik LCS1 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l % PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l % PASS Arsenic (As) µg/l % PASS Beryllium (Be) µg/l % PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l % PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l % PASS Cobalt (Co) µg/l % PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l % PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l % PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l % PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l % PASS Mercury (Hg) µg/l % PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l % PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l % PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l % PASS Silver (Ag) µg/l % PASS Thallium (Tl) µg/l % PASS Tin (Sn) µg/l % PASS GEO008 Montage Surfzone Monitoring

43 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Titanium (Ti) µg/l % PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l % PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l % PASS QAQC LCM-CRG Seawater Prepared 11/4/2008 Analyzed 06-Nov-08 Lab Control Spik LCS2 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Arsenic (As) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Beryllium (Be) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l % PASS 4 30 PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l % PASS 2 30 PASS Cobalt (Co) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l % PASS 6 30 PASS Mercury (Hg) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l % PASS 8 30 PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l % PASS 4 30 PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Silver (Ag) µg/l % PASS PASS Thallium (Tl) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Tin (Sn) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS GEO008 Montage Surfzone Monitoring

44 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

45

46 CRG PID GEO008 CRG RID SAMPLE RECIEPT FORM CLIENT: Geosyntec Date Received: Oct 23, 2008 # of Samples: 3 COURIER INFORMATION CRG CLIENT OTHER Melissa FEDEX UPS tracking # SF TEMPERATURE SAMPLE MATRIX 6 C WET ICE BLUE ICE NO ICE LIQUID TISSUE CLIENT COC INCLUDED NOT INCLUDED SIGNED NOT SIGNED Composite at CRG, equal Composite at CRG, flow-weighted SOLID OTHER Homogenized Unhomogenized Received By : CONDITION OF SAMPLES UPON VERIFICATION All sample containers received intact and in good condition... All samples listed on COC(s) are present... All sample IDs on containers are consistent with sample IDs on COC(s)... Correct containers used for analyses requested... All samples received within method holding time... NOTES Received (5) 1L HDPE for metals for SID 75939: North Rush 10 day TAT(SF) Yes No NA SF Samples verified by : Print Form

47 October 29, 2008 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. "A Center for Excellence in Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Microbiology" Geosyntec Consultants 924 Anacapa Street Suite 4A Santa Barbara, CA Re: CRG Marine Laboratories Project ID: GEO008 Geosyntec Consultants Project ID: Montage Surfzone Monitoring ATTN: Brandon Steets CRG Laboratories is pleased to provide you with the enclosed analytical data report for your Montage Surfzone Monitoring project. According to the chain-of-custody, 3 samples were received intact at CRG on 10/23/2008. Per your instructions, the samples were analyzed for: Enterococci / Enterolert Using Method Enterolert Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 Using Method SM 9221E Coliform / MTF 20 Using Method SM 9221B Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions and thank you very much for using our laboratory for your analtytical needs. Regards, Antony Basil Reviewed and Approved 2020 Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) crglabs@sbcglobal.net

48 CRG s QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY BATCH: CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document defines a batch as a group of 20 or fewer samples of similar matrix, processed together under the same conditions and with the same reagents. Quality control samples are associated with each batch and are used to assess the validity of the sample analyses. CRG typically uses batch sizes of samples. PROCEDURAL BLANKS: Laboratory contamination was controlled through the analysis of procedural blanks on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that all procedural blanks be below 10 times the MDL and all detectable constituents in the blanks be flagged in the sample results. The Procedural Blanks are presented in the Procedural Blank section of this report. ACCURACY: Accuracy of the project data was indicated by analysis of matrix spikes (MS/MSD), surrogate spikes, certified reference materials, positive controls, and/or laboratory control materials on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that 95% of the target compounds greater than 10 times the MDL be within the specified acceptance limits. The Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Accuracy Data section of this report. PRECISION: Precision of the project data was determined by analysis of duplicate matrix spikes, blank spikes, and/or duplicate test sample analysis on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that for 95% of the compounds >10 times the MDL, the % Relative Percent Difference (%RPD) should be within the specified acceptance range. The %RPD for the duplicate test sample analysis can be significantly affected by the homogeneity of the sample matrix within the sample container itself causing additional variability in the analytical results. In these cases, the QA/QC Acceptance Limits may be exceeded. The %RPD and Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Precision Data section of this report. TOTAL/DISSOLVED: In some instances, the results for the Dissolved fraction can be higher than the fraction for a particular parameter. This is typically caused by the analytical variation for each result and indicates that the target parameter is primarily in the dissolved phase. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Qualifier B E H J M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 ND or U NES Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Definition Analyte was detected in the associated method blank. Analyte concentration exceeds the calibration range Sample received and/or analyzed past the recommended holding time. Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is estimated. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to matrix interference. The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. Detection of the analyte was difficult due to matrix interference. Spike or surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank spike or surrogate compound was in control and therefore the sample data was reported without further clarification. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to an unknown compound(s) in the sample that interferes with the known target compound causing an increased response. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to unknown heavy hydrocarbons detected in the sample which elevates the baseline. Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit. Not enough sample. Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike concentration. The sample RPD was out of control. Sample is heterogeneous and sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved using routine laboratory practices. RPD values are not accurate and not applicable because the results for R1 and/or R2 are lower than 10 times the MDL. Due to the sample rate of the instrument, the peak area was underestimated because the apex of the peak was missed. This random error has caused this compound to fail for the spike and/or precision. This failure does not indicate any significant problems with the analysis of this sample and the data passes CRG s QAPP requirements.

49 Project Sample List Geosyntec Consultants CRG Project ID: GEO008 Project Officer: Brandon Steets Project Description: Montage Surfzone Monitoring CRG Sample ID# Client Sample ID Sample Description Date Sampled Matrix North 23-Oct-08 Seawater Middle 23-Oct-08 Seawater South 23-Oct-08 Seawater

50 DATA REPORT

51 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: North Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 23-Oct Oct-08 GEO008 13:25 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B < 20 MPN/100mL 20 17:45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

52 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: Middle Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 23-Oct Oct-08 GEO008 14:15 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B < 20 MPN/100mL 20 17:45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

53 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: South Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 23-Oct Oct-08 GEO008 15:05 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B < 20 MPN/100mL 20 17:45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

54 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

55 REAGENT BLANK RESULTS

56 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: B1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: QAQC Montage Surfzone Monitoring Reagent Reagent Blank CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: GEO008 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B < 20 MPN/100mL 20 17:45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # B1

57 ACCURACY DATA

58 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: PC1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: QAQC Montage Surfzone Monitoring Culture Positive Control CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: GEO008 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert PASS MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E PASS MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B PASS MPN/100mL 20 17:45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct :45 23-Oct MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # PC1

59 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

60

61 January 26, 2009 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. "A Center for Excellence in Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Microbiology" Geosyntec Consultants 924 Anacapa Street Suite 4A Santa Barbara, CA Re: CRG Marine Laboratories Geosyntec Consultants Project ID: GEO008b Project ID: Montage Surfzone Monitoring ATTN: Brandon Steets CRG Laboratories is pleased to provide you with the enclosed analytical data report for your Montage Surfzone Monitoring project. According to the chain-of-custody, 4 samples were received intact at CRG on 12/17/2008. Per your instructions, the samples were analyzed for: Trace Metals By ICPMS Using Method Mercury (Hg) By CVAFS Using Method EPA 245.7m Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions and thank you very much for using our laboratory for your analytical needs. Regards, Rhonda Moeller Reviewed and Approved 2020 Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) crglabs@sbcglobal.net

62 Project Sample List Geosyntec Consultants CRG Project ID: GEO008b Project Officer: Brandon Steets Project Description: Montage Surfzone Monitoring CRG Sample ID# Client Sample ID Sample Description Date Sampled Matrix North 17-Dec-08 Seawater Middle 17-Dec-08 Seawater South 17-Dec-08 Seawater FDS 17-Dec-08 Seawater

63 CRG s QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY BATCH: CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document defines a batch as a group of 20 or fewer samples of similar matrix, processed together under the same conditions and with the same reagents. Quality control samples are associated with each batch and are used to assess the validity of the sample analyses. CRG typically uses batch sizes of samples. PROCEDURAL BLANKS: Laboratory contamination was controlled through the analysis of procedural blanks on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that all procedural blanks be below 10 times the MDL and all detectable constituents in the blanks be flagged in the sample results. The Procedural Blanks are presented in the Procedural Blank section of this report. ACCURACY: Accuracy of the project data was indicated by analysis of matrix spikes (MS/MSD), surrogate spikes, certified reference materials, positive controls, and/or laboratory control materials on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that 95% of the target compounds greater than 10 times the MDL be within the specified acceptance limits. The Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Accuracy Data section of this report. PRECISION: Precision of the project data was determined by analysis of duplicate matrix spikes, blank spikes, and/or duplicate test sample analysis on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that for 95% of the compounds >10 times the MDL, the % Relative Percent Difference (%RPD) should be within the specified acceptance range. The %RPD for the duplicate test sample analysis can be significantly affected by the homogeneity of the sample matrix within the sample container itself causing additional variability in the analytical results. In these cases, the QA/QC Acceptance Limits may be exceeded. The %RPD and Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Precision Data section of this report. TOTAL/DISSOLVED: In some instances, the results for the Dissolved fraction can be higher than the fraction for a particular parameter. This is typically caused by the analytical variation for each result and indicates that the target parameter is primarily in the dissolved phase. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Qualifier B E H J M1 M2 M3 M4 Definition Analyte was detected in the associated method blank. Analyte concentration exceeds the calibration range Sample received and/or analyzed past the recommended holding time. Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is estimated. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to matrix interference. The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. Detection of the analyte was difficult due to matrix interference. Spike or surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank spike or surrogate compound was in control and therefore the sample data was reported without further clarification.

64 M5 M6 ND or U NES Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to an unknown compound(s) in the sample that interferes with the known target compound causing an increased response. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to unknown heavy hydrocarbons detected in the sample which elevates the baseline. Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit. Not enough sample. Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike concentration. The sample RPD was out of control. Sample is heterogeneous and sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved using routine laboratory practices. RPD values are not accurate and not applicable because the results for R1 and/or R2 are lower than 10 times the MDL. Due to the sample rate of the instrument, the peak area was underestimated because the apex of the peak was missed. This random error has caused this compound to fail for the spike and/or precision. This failure does not indicate any significant problems with the analysis of this sample and the data passes CRG s QAPP requirements. Precision failed due to one of the sample extractions having lower recoveries than the duplicate. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document allows for 5% of the target compounds greater than 10 times the MDL to be outside the specified acceptance limits for precision and/or accuracy. This is often due to random error and cannot be attributed to a specific issue.

65 Qualifier Summary for GEO008b Trace Metals Sample ID Client Sample ID Qualifier Parameter R R R R R R R R R R R R R2 South J Antimony (Sb) South J Beryllium (Be) Middle Q2 Iron (Fe) North J Selenium (Se) Middle J Selenium (Se) Middle J Selenium (Se) South J Selenium (Se) FDS J Selenium (Se) North J Tin (Sn) North J Titanium (Ti) Middle J Titanium (Ti) Middle J Titanium (Ti) Middle Q3 Zinc (Zn) Page 1 of 1

66 DATA REPORT

67 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code R1 North Seawater Sampled: 17-Dec-08 Received: 17-Dec-08 Aluminum (Al) Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved 97.6 ND 0.05 ND ND ND ND ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Manganese (Mn) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /6/2009 1/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Mercury (Hg) Dissolved ND µg/l /6/2009 1/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

68 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Nickel (Ni) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Thallium (Tl) Tin (Sn) Tin (Sn) Titanium (Ti) Titanium (Ti) Vanadium (V) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Zinc (Zn) Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ R1 Middle Seawater Sampled: 17-Dec-08 Received: 17-Dec-08 Aluminum (Al) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Aluminum (Al) Dissolved ND 3 6 µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Antimony (Sb) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Antimony (Sb) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Arsenic (As) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Arsenic (As) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Beryllium (Be) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Cadmium (Cd) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

69 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Chromium (Cr) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Chromium (Cr) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Cobalt (Co) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Cobalt (Co) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Copper (Cu) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Copper (Cu) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Iron (Fe) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Iron (Fe) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Lead (Pb) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Lead (Pb) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Manganese (Mn) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Manganese (Mn) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /6/2009 1/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Mercury (Hg) Dissolved ND µg/l /6/2009 1/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Nickel (Ni) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Nickel (Ni) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Selenium (Se) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J Selenium (Se) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Silver (Ag) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Silver (Ag) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Thallium (Tl) ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Thallium (Tl) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Tin (Sn) ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Tin (Sn) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Titanium (Ti) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Titanium (Ti) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

70 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Vanadium (V) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Vanadium (V) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Zinc (Zn) ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Zinc (Zn) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ R1 South Seawater Sampled: 17-Dec-08 Received: 17-Dec-08 Aluminum (Al) Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Manganese (Mn) Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 ND 3 6 µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

71 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /6/2009 1/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Mercury (Hg) Dissolved ND µg/l /6/2009 1/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Thallium (Tl) Tin (Sn) Tin (Sn) Titanium (Ti) Titanium (Ti) Vanadium (V) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) Zinc (Zn) Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J 0.06 ND ND ND ND ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ µg/l /12/2009 1/18/ R1 FDS Seawater Sampled: 17-Dec-08 Received: 17-Dec-08 Aluminum (Al) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Aluminum (Al) Dissolved ND 3 6 µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Antimony (Sb) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Antimony (Sb) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Arsenic (As) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Arsenic (As) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

72 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Beryllium (Be) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Cadmium (Cd) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Chromium (Cr) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Chromium (Cr) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Cobalt (Co) ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Cobalt (Co) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Copper (Cu) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Copper (Cu) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Iron (Fe) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Iron (Fe) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Lead (Pb) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Lead (Pb) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Manganese (Mn) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Manganese (Mn) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /6/2009 1/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Mercury (Hg) Dissolved ND µg/l /6/2009 1/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Nickel (Ni) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Nickel (Ni) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Selenium (Se) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J Selenium (Se) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 J Silver (Ag) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Silver (Ag) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Thallium (Tl) ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Thallium (Tl) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

73 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Tin (Sn) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Tin (Sn) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Titanium (Ti) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Titanium (Ti) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Vanadium (V) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Vanadium (V) Dissolved µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Zinc (Zn) µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 Zinc (Zn) Dissolved ND µg/l /12/2009 1/18/2009 GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

74 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

75 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code QAQC LCM-CRG Seawater Lab Control Mate LCM1 Seawater Aluminum (Al) Dissolved ND 3 6 µg/l Antimony (Sb) Dissolved µg/l Arsenic (As) Dissolved µg/l Beryllium (Be) Dissolved ND µg/l Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved µg/l Chromium (Cr) Dissolved µg/l Cobalt (Co) Dissolved µg/l Copper (Cu) Dissolved µg/l Iron (Fe) Dissolved ND µg/l Lead (Pb) Dissolved ND µg/l Manganese (Mn) Dissolved µg/l Mercury (Hg) Dissolved 5062 ND µg/l Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved µg/l Nickel (Ni) Dissolved µg/l Selenium (Se) Dissolved µg/l Silver (Ag) Dissolved ND µg/l Thallium (Tl) Dissolved ND µg/l Tin (Sn) Dissolved ND µg/l Titanium (Ti) Dissolved ND µg/l Vanadium (V) Dissolved µg/l Zinc (Zn) Dissolved ND µg/l Prepared 1/12/2009 Analyzed 18-Jan-09 QAQC LCM-CRG Seawater Prepared 1/12/2009 Analyzed 18-Jan-09 Lab Control Spik LCS1 Seawater Aluminum (Al) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Antimony (Sb) Dissolved µg/l % PASS GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

76 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Arsenic (As) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Beryllium (Be) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Chromium (Cr) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Cobalt (Co) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Copper (Cu) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Iron (Fe) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Lead (Pb) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Manganese (Mn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Mercury (Hg) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Nickel (Ni) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Selenium (Se) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Silver (Ag) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Thallium (Tl) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Tin (Sn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Titanium (Ti) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Vanadium (V) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Zinc (Zn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS QAQC LCM-CRG Seawater Prepared 1/12/2009 Analyzed 18-Jan-09 Lab Control Spik LCS2 Seawater Aluminum (Al) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Antimony (Sb) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Arsenic (As) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Beryllium (Be) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Chromium (Cr) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

77 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail Cobalt (Co) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Copper (Cu) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Iron (Fe) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Lead (Pb) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Manganese (Mn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 8 30 PASS Mercury (Hg) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Nickel (Ni) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Selenium (Se) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Silver (Ag) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Thallium (Tl) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Tin (Sn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Vanadium (V) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Zinc (Zn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code QAQC Procedural Blank Lab Blank B1 DI Water Aluminum (Al) ND 3 6 µg/l Aluminum (Al) Dissolved ND 3 6 µg/l Antimony (Sb) ND µg/l Antimony (Sb) Dissolved ND µg/l Arsenic (As) ND µg/l Arsenic (As) Dissolved ND µg/l Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l Beryllium (Be) Dissolved ND µg/l Cadmium (Cd) ND µg/l Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved ND µg/l Prepared 1/12/2009 Analyzed 18-Jan-09 GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

78 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Chromium (Cr) ND µg/l Chromium (Cr) Dissolved ND µg/l Cobalt (Co) ND µg/l Cobalt (Co) Dissolved ND µg/l Copper (Cu) ND µg/l Copper (Cu) Dissolved ND µg/l Iron (Fe) ND µg/l Iron (Fe) Dissolved ND µg/l Lead (Pb) ND µg/l Lead (Pb) Dissolved ND µg/l Manganese (Mn) ND µg/l Manganese (Mn) Dissolved ND µg/l Mercury (Hg) 5062 ND µg/l Mercury (Hg) Dissolved 5062 ND µg/l Molybdenum (Mo) ND µg/l Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved ND µg/l Nickel (Ni) ND µg/l Nickel (Ni) Dissolved ND µg/l Selenium (Se) ND µg/l Selenium (Se) Dissolved ND µg/l Silver (Ag) ND µg/l Silver (Ag) Dissolved ND µg/l Thallium (Tl) ND µg/l Thallium (Tl) Dissolved ND µg/l Tin (Sn) ND µg/l Tin (Sn) Dissolved ND µg/l Titanium (Ti) ND µg/l Titanium (Ti) Dissolved ND µg/l GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

79 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Vanadium (V) ND µg/l Vanadium (V) Dissolved ND µg/l Zinc (Zn) ND µg/l Zinc (Zn) Dissolved ND µg/l Middle Prepared 1/12/2009 Analyzed 18-Jan-09 Matrix Spike MS1 Seawater Aluminum (Al) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Antimony (Sb) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Arsenic (As) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Beryllium (Be) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Chromium (Cr) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Cobalt (Co) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Copper (Cu) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Iron (Fe) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Lead (Pb) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Manganese (Mn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Mercury (Hg) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Nickel (Ni) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Selenium (Se) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Silver (Ag) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Thallium (Tl) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Tin (Sn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Titanium (Ti) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Vanadium (V) Dissolved µg/l % PASS Zinc (Zn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

80 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Middle Prepared 1/12/2009 Analyzed 18-Jan-09 Matrix Spike Dup MS2 Seawater Aluminum (Al) Dissolved µg/l % PASS PASS Antimony (Sb) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Arsenic (As) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 4 30 PASS Beryllium (Be) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 2 30 PASS Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Chromium (Cr) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Cobalt (Co) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Copper (Cu) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Iron (Fe) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Lead (Pb) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Manganese (Mn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Mercury (Hg) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Nickel (Ni) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Selenium (Se) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Silver (Ag) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Thallium (Tl) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Tin (Sn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 2 30 PASS Vanadium (V) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Zinc (Zn) Dissolved µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Middle Prepared 1/12/2009 Analyzed 18-Jan-09 Lab Dup R2 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l 5 30 PASS Aluminum (Al) Dissolved ND 3 6 µg/l 0 30 PASS GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

81 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Source % Acceptance Limit RPD RPD Limit QA Level Result Recovery Limits Pass/Fail LIMIT Pass/Fail Code Antimony (Sb) µg/l PASS Antimony (Sb) Dissolved µg/l 0 30 PASS Arsenic (As) µg/l PASS Arsenic (As) Dissolved µg/l 1 30 PASS Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Beryllium (Be) Dissolved ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l PASS Cadmium (Cd) Dissolved µg/l 2 30 PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l 5 30 PASS Chromium (Cr) Dissolved µg/l 6 30 PASS Cobalt (Co) µg/l PASS Cobalt (Co) Dissolved µg/l PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l PASS Copper (Cu) Dissolved µg/l 0 30 PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l FAIL Q2 Iron (Fe) Dissolved ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l 3 30 PASS Lead (Pb) Dissolved ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l 4 30 PASS Manganese (Mn) Dissolved µg/l 3 30 PASS Mercury (Hg) 5062 ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Mercury (Hg) Dissolved 5062 ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l 3 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) Dissolved µg/l 0 30 PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l 2 30 PASS Nickel (Ni) Dissolved µg/l 2 30 PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l 0 30 PASS J Selenium (Se) Dissolved µg/l 0 30 PASS J GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

82 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Source % Acceptance Limit RPD RPD Limit QA Level Result Recovery Limits Pass/Fail LIMIT Pass/Fail Code Silver (Ag) µg/l 0 30 PASS Silver (Ag) Dissolved ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Thallium (Tl) ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Thallium (Tl) Dissolved ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Tin (Sn) ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Tin (Sn) Dissolved ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l 5 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) Dissolved µg/l PASS J Vanadium (V) µg/l 0 30 PASS Vanadium (V) Dissolved µg/l 2 30 PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l FAIL Q3 Zinc (Zn) Dissolved ND µg/l 0 30 PASS GEO008b Montage Surfzone Monitoring

83 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

84

85 CRG PID GEO008b CRG RID SAMPLE RECEIPT FORM CLIENT: Geosyntec Date Received: Dec 17, 2008 # of Samples: 4 COURIER INFORMATION CRG CLIENT OTHER Kevin L. FEDEX UPS tracking # SF TEMPERATURE SAMPLE MATRIX 6 C WET ICE BLUE ICE NO ICE LIQUID TISSUE CLIENT COC INCLUDED NOT INCLUDED SIGNED NOT SIGNED Composite at CRG, equal Composite at CRG, flow-weighted SOLID OTHER Homogenized Unhomogenized Received By : CONDITION OF SAMPLES UPON VERIFICATION All sample containers received intact and in good condition... All samples listed on COC(s) are present... All sample IDs on containers are consistent with sample IDs on COC(s)... Correct containers used for analyses requested... All samples received within method holding time... NOTES Yes No NA SF Samples verified by : Print Form

86 December 29, 2008 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. "A Center for Excellence in Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Microbiology" Geosyntec Consultants 924 Anacapa Street Suite 4A Santa Barbara, CA Re: CRG Marine Laboratories Project ID: GEO008b Geosyntec Consultants Project ID: Montage Surfzone Monitoring ATTN: Brandon Steets CRG Laboratories is pleased to provide you with the enclosed analytical data report for your Montage Surfzone Monitoring project. According to the chain-of-custody, 4 samples were received intact at CRG on 12/17/2008. Per your instructions, the samples were analyzed for: Enterococci / Enterolert Using Method Enterolert Coliform / MTF 20 Using Method SM 9221B Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 Using Method SM 9221E Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions and thank you very much for using our laboratory for your analtytical needs. Regards, Antony Basil Reviewed and Approved 2020 Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) crglabs@sbcglobal.net

87 CRG s QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY BATCH: CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document defines a batch as a group of 20 or fewer samples of similar matrix, processed together under the same conditions and with the same reagents. Quality control samples are associated with each batch and are used to assess the validity of the sample analyses. CRG typically uses batch sizes of samples. PROCEDURAL BLANKS: Laboratory contamination was controlled through the analysis of procedural blanks on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that all procedural blanks be below 10 times the MDL and all detectable constituents in the blanks be flagged in the sample results. The Procedural Blanks are presented in the Procedural Blank section of this report. ACCURACY: Accuracy of the project data was indicated by analysis of matrix spikes (MS/MSD), surrogate spikes, certified reference materials, positive controls, and/or laboratory control materials on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that 95% of the target compounds greater than 10 times the MDL be within the specified acceptance limits. The Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Accuracy Data section of this report. PRECISION: Precision of the project data was determined by analysis of duplicate matrix spikes, blank spikes, and/or duplicate test sample analysis on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that for 95% of the compounds >10 times the MDL, the % Relative Percent Difference (%RPD) should be within the specified acceptance range. The %RPD for the duplicate test sample analysis can be significantly affected by the homogeneity of the sample matrix within the sample container itself causing additional variability in the analytical results. In these cases, the QA/QC Acceptance Limits may be exceeded. The %RPD and Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Precision Data section of this report. TOTAL/DISSOLVED: In some instances, the results for the Dissolved fraction can be higher than the fraction for a particular parameter. This is typically caused by the analytical variation for each result and indicates that the target parameter is primarily in the dissolved phase. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Qualifier B E H J M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 ND or U NES Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Definition Analyte was detected in the associated method blank. Analyte concentration exceeds the calibration range Sample received and/or analyzed past the recommended holding time. Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is estimated. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to matrix interference. The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. Detection of the analyte was difficult due to matrix interference. Spike or surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank spike or surrogate compound was in control and therefore the sample data was reported without further clarification. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to an unknown compound(s) in the sample that interferes with the known target compound causing an increased response. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to unknown heavy hydrocarbons detected in the sample which elevates the baseline. Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit. Not enough sample. Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike concentration. The sample RPD was out of control. Sample is heterogeneous and sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved using routine laboratory practices. RPD values are not accurate and not applicable because the results for R1 and/or R2 are lower than 10 times the MDL. Due to the sample rate of the instrument, the peak area was underestimated because the apex of the peak was missed. This random error has caused this compound to fail for the spike and/or precision. This failure does not indicate any significant problems with the analysis of this sample and the data passes CRG s QAPP requirements.

88 Project Sample List Geosyntec Consultants CRG Project ID: GEO008b Project Officer: Brandon Steets Project Description: Montage Surfzone Monitoring CRG Sample ID# Client Sample ID Sample Description Date Sampled Matrix North 17-Dec-08 Seawater Middle 17-Dec-08 Seawater South 17-Dec-08 Seawater FDS 17-Dec-08 Seawater

89 DATA REPORT

90 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: North Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 17-Dec Dec-08 GEO008b CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B 40 MPN/100mL 20 14:00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

91 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: Middle Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 17-Dec Dec-08 GEO008b CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B 40 MPN/100mL 20 14:00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

92 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: South Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 17-Dec Dec-08 GEO008b CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E 130 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B 300 MPN/100mL 20 14:00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

93 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: FDS Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 17-Dec Dec-08 GEO008b CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B 20 MPN/100mL 20 14:00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

94 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

95 REAGENT BLANK RESULTS

96 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: B1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: QAQC Montage Surfzone Monitoring Reagent Reagent Blank CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: GEO008b CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B < 20 MPN/100mL 20 14:00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # B1

97 ACCURACY DATA

98 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: PC1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: QAQC Montage Surfzone Monitoring Culture Positive Control CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: GEO008b CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert PASS MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E PASS MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B PASS MPN/100mL 20 14:00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec :00 17-Dec MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # PC1

99 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

100

101 April 09, 2009 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. "A Center for Excellence in Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Microbiology" Geosyntec Consultants 924 Anacapa Street Suite 4A Santa Barbara, CA Re: CRG Marine Laboratories Geosyntec Consultants Project ID: GEO Project ID: Montage Surfzone Monitoring ATTN: Brandon Steets CRG Laboratories is pleased to provide you with the enclosed analytical data report for your Montage Surfzone Monitoring project. According to the chain-of-custody, 4 samples were received intact at CRG on 2/18/2009. Per your instructions, the samples were analyzed for: Trace Metals By ICPMS Using Method Mercury (Hg) By CVAFS Using Method EPA 245.7m Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions and thank you very much for using our laboratory for your analytical needs. Regards, Rhonda Moeller Reviewed and Approved 2020 Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) crglabs@sbcglobal.net

102 Project Sample List Geosyntec Consultants CRG Project ID: GEO Project Officer: Brandon Steets Project Description: Montage Surfzone Monitoring CRG Sample ID# Client Sample ID Sample Description Date Sampled Matrix North 18-Feb-09 Seawater Middle 18-Feb-09 Seawater South 18-Feb-09 Seawater FDS 18-Feb-09 Seawater

103 CRG s QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY BATCH: CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document defines a batch as a group of 20 or fewer samples of similar matrix, processed together under the same conditions and with the same reagents. Quality control samples are associated with each batch and are used to assess the validity of the sample analyses. CRG typically uses batch sizes of samples. PROCEDURAL BLANKS: Laboratory contamination was controlled through the analysis of procedural blanks on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that all procedural blanks be below 10 times the MDL and all detectable constituents in the blanks be flagged in the sample results. The Procedural Blanks are presented in the Procedural Blank section of this report. ACCURACY: Accuracy of the project data was indicated by analysis of matrix spikes (MS/MSD), surrogate spikes, certified reference materials, positive controls, and/or laboratory control materials on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that 95% of the target compounds greater than 10 times the MDL be within the specified acceptance limits. The Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Accuracy Data section of this report. PRECISION: Precision of the project data was determined by analysis of duplicate matrix spikes, blank spikes, and/or duplicate test sample analysis on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that for 95% of the compounds >10 times the MDL, the % Relative Percent Difference (%RPD) should be within the specified acceptance range. The %RPD for the duplicate test sample analysis can be significantly affected by the homogeneity of the sample matrix within the sample container itself causing additional variability in the analytical results. In these cases, the QA/QC Acceptance Limits may be exceeded. The %RPD and Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Precision Data section of this report. TOTAL/DISSOLVED: In some instances, the results for the Dissolved fraction can be higher than the fraction for a particular parameter. This is typically caused by the analytical variation for each result and indicates that the target parameter is primarily in the dissolved phase. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Qualifier B E H J M1 M2 M3 M4 Definition Analyte was detected in the associated method blank. Analyte concentration exceeds the calibration range Sample received and/or analyzed past the recommended holding time. Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is estimated. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to matrix interference. The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. Detection of the analyte was difficult due to matrix interference. Spike or surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank spike or surrogate compound was in control and therefore the sample data was reported without further clarification.

104 M5 M6 ND or U NES Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to an unknown compound(s) in the sample that interferes with the known target compound causing an increased response. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to unknown heavy hydrocarbons detected in the sample which elevates the baseline. Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit. Not enough sample. Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike concentration. The sample RPD was out of control. Sample is heterogeneous and sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved using routine laboratory practices. RPD values are not accurate and not applicable because the results for R1 and/or R2 are lower than 10 times the MDL. Due to the sample rate of the instrument, the peak area was underestimated because the apex of the peak was missed. This random error has caused this compound to fail for the spike and/or precision. This failure does not indicate any significant problems with the analysis of this sample and the data passes CRG s QAPP requirements. Precision failed due to one of the sample extractions having lower recoveries than the duplicate. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document allows for 5% of the target compounds greater than 10 times the MDL to be outside the specified acceptance limits for precision and/or accuracy. This is often due to random error and cannot be attributed to a specific issue. Toxaphene results are based on a commercial Toxaphene mixture of unknown composition and therefore the concentrations listed in this report are estimated.

105 Qualifier Summary for GEO Trace Metals Sample ID Client Sample ID Qualifier Parameter R R R R R R R R R1 North J Mercury (Hg) North J Selenium (Se) Middle J Selenium (Se) Middle J Selenium (Se) North J Thallium (Tl) Middle J Thallium (Tl) Middle J Thallium (Tl) North J Tin (Sn) FDS J Tin (Sn) Page 1 of 1

106 DATA REPORT

107 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code R1 North Seawater Sampled: 18-Feb-09 12:05 Received: 18-Feb-09 Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Mercury (Hg) µg/l /6/2009 3/6/2009 EPA 245.7m J Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Tin (Sn) Titanium (Ti) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 J ND µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 J µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 J µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ R1 Middle Seawater Sampled: 18-Feb-09 11:25 Received: 18-Feb-09 Aluminum (Al) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Antimony (Sb) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Arsenic (As) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

108 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Manganese (Mn) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /6/2009 3/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Tin (Sn) Titanium (Ti) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 J ND µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 J µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ R1 South Seawater Sampled: 18-Feb-09 10:25 Received: 18-Feb-09 Aluminum (Al) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Antimony (Sb) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Arsenic (As) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Beryllium (Be) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Cadmium (Cd) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Chromium (Cr) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Cobalt (Co) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Copper (Cu) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

109 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /6/2009 3/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Tin (Sn) Titanium (Ti) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) ND µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ R1 FDS Seawater Sampled: 18-Feb-09 12:10 Received: 18-Feb-09 Aluminum (Al) Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Copper (Cu) Iron (Fe) Lead (Pb) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Manganese (Mn) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 Mercury (Hg) ND µg/l /6/2009 3/6/2009 EPA 245.7m Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

110 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals ANALYTICAL REPORT Analyte Fraction Result MDL RL Units Batch Prepared Analyzed Method QA Code Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Silver (Ag) Thallium (Tl) Tin (Sn) Titanium (Ti) Vanadium (V) Zinc (Zn) µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 ND µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 J µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/ µg/l /17/2009 3/31/2009 GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

111 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

112 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code QAQC LCM-CRG Seawater Lab Control Mate LCM1 Seawater Aluminum (Al) ND 3 6 µg/l Antimony (Sb) µg/l Arsenic (As) µg/l Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l Cadmium (Cd) µg/l Chromium (Cr) µg/l Cobalt (Co) ND µg/l Copper (Cu) µg/l Iron (Fe) ND µg/l Lead (Pb) ND µg/l Manganese (Mn) µg/l Mercury (Hg) 5085 ND µg/l Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l Nickel (Ni) µg/l Selenium (Se) µg/l Silver (Ag) ND µg/l Thallium (Tl) µg/l Tin (Sn) µg/l Titanium (Ti) µg/l Vanadium (V) µg/l Zinc (Zn) ND µg/l Prepared 3/17/2009 Analyzed 31-Mar-09 QAQC LCM-CRG Seawater Prepared 3/17/2009 Analyzed 31-Mar-09 Lab Control Spik LCS1 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l % PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l % PASS GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

113 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Arsenic (As) µg/l % PASS Beryllium (Be) µg/l % PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l % PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l % PASS Cobalt (Co) µg/l % PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l % PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l % PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l % PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l % PASS Mercury (Hg) µg/l % PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l % PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l % PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l % PASS Silver (Ag) µg/l % PASS Thallium (Tl) µg/l % PASS Tin (Sn) µg/l % PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l % PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l % PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l % PASS QAQC LCM-CRG Seawater Prepared 3/17/2009 Analyzed 31-Mar-09 Lab Control Spik LCS2 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l % PASS 8 30 PASS Arsenic (As) µg/l % PASS 2 30 PASS Beryllium (Be) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l % PASS PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

114 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail Cobalt (Co) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l % PASS 7 30 PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l % PASS PASS Mercury (Hg) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l % PASS PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l % PASS 8 30 PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l % PASS 7 30 PASS Silver (Ag) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Thallium (Tl) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Tin (Sn) µg/l % PASS 5 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code QAQC Procedural Blank Lab Blank B1 DI Water Aluminum (Al) ND 3 6 µg/l Antimony (Sb) ND µg/l Arsenic (As) ND µg/l Beryllium (Be) ND µg/l Cadmium (Cd) ND µg/l Chromium (Cr) ND µg/l Cobalt (Co) ND µg/l Copper (Cu) ND µg/l Iron (Fe) ND µg/l Lead (Pb) ND µg/l Prepared 3/17/2009 Analyzed 31-Mar-09 GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

115 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Manganese (Mn) ND µg/l Mercury (Hg) 5085 ND µg/l Mercury (Hg) Dissolved 5085 ND µg/l Molybdenum (Mo) ND µg/l Nickel (Ni) ND µg/l Selenium (Se) ND µg/l Silver (Ag) ND µg/l Thallium (Tl) ND µg/l Tin (Sn) ND µg/l Titanium (Ti) ND µg/l Vanadium (V) ND µg/l Zinc (Zn) ND µg/l Middle Prepared 3/17/2009 Analyzed 31-Mar-09 Matrix Spike MS1 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l % PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l % PASS Arsenic (As) µg/l % PASS Beryllium (Be) µg/l % PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l % PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l % PASS Cobalt (Co) µg/l % PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l % PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l % PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l % PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l % PASS Mercury (Hg) µg/l % PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l % PASS GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

116 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Level Source Result % Recovery Acceptance Limits Limit Pass/Fail RPD RPD LIMIT Limit QA Pass/Fail Code Nickel (Ni) µg/l % PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l % PASS Silver (Ag) µg/l % PASS Thallium (Tl) µg/l % PASS Tin (Sn) µg/l % PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l % PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l % PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l % PASS Middle Prepared 3/17/2009 Analyzed 31-Mar-09 Matrix Spike Dup MS2 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l % PASS PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Arsenic (As) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Beryllium (Be) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Cobalt (Co) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l % PASS 7 30 PASS Mercury (Hg) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Silver (Ag) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Thallium (Tl) µg/l % PASS 4 30 PASS GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

117 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Trace Metals QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analyte Fraction Batch ID Result MDL RL Units Spike Source % Acceptance Limit RPD RPD Limit QA Level Result Recovery Limits Pass/Fail LIMIT Pass/Fail Code Tin (Sn) µg/l % PASS 1 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l % PASS 5 30 PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l % PASS 0 30 PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l % PASS 3 30 PASS Middle Prepared 3/17/2009 Analyzed 31-Mar-09 Lab Dup R2 Seawater Aluminum (Al) µg/l 1 30 PASS Antimony (Sb) µg/l 0 30 PASS Arsenic (As) µg/l 5 30 PASS Beryllium (Be) µg/l 0 30 PASS Cadmium (Cd) µg/l 1 30 PASS Chromium (Cr) µg/l FAIL Cobalt (Co) µg/l 4 30 PASS Copper (Cu) µg/l 0 30 PASS Iron (Fe) µg/l 0 30 PASS Lead (Pb) µg/l 0 30 PASS Manganese (Mn) µg/l 3 30 PASS Mercury (Hg) 5085 ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Molybdenum (Mo) µg/l 1 30 PASS Nickel (Ni) µg/l 1 30 PASS Selenium (Se) µg/l 0 30 PASS J Silver (Ag) ND µg/l 0 30 PASS Thallium (Tl) µg/l 0 30 PASS J Tin (Sn) µg/l 3 30 PASS Titanium (Ti) µg/l 0 30 PASS Vanadium (V) µg/l 3 30 PASS Zinc (Zn) µg/l FAIL GEO Montage Surfzone Monitoring

118 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

119

120 CRG PID GEO CRG RID SAMPLE RECEIPT FORM CLIENT: Geosyntec Date Received: Feb 18, 2009 # of Samples: 4 COURIER INFORMATION CRG CLIENT OTHER Kevin L. FEDEX UPS tracking # SF TEMPERATURE SAMPLE MATRIX 9 C WET ICE BLUE ICE NO ICE LIQUID TISSUE CLIENT COC INCLUDED NOT INCLUDED SIGNED NOT SIGNED Composite at CRG, equal Composite at CRG, flow-weighted SOLID OTHER Homogenized Unhomogenized Received By : CONDITION OF SAMPLES UPON VERIFICATION All sample containers received intact and in good condition... All samples listed on COC(s) are present... All sample IDs on containers are consistent with sample IDs on COC(s)... Correct containers used for analyses requested... All samples received within method holding time... NOTES RUSH: 10 day TAT (SF) Yes No NA SF Samples verified by : Print Form

121 February 26, 2009 CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc. "A Center for Excellence in Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Microbiology" Geosyntec Consultants 924 Anacapa Street Suite 4A Santa Barbara, CA Re: CRG Marine Laboratories Project ID: GEO Geosyntec Consultants Project ID: Montage Surfzone Monitoring ATTN: Brandon Steets CRG Laboratories is pleased to provide you with the enclosed analytical data report for your Montage Surfzone Monitoring project. According to the chain-of-custody, 4 samples were received intact at CRG on 2/18/2009. Per your instructions, the samples were analyzed for: Enterococci / Enterolert Using Method Enterolert Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 Using Method SM 9221E Coliform / MTF 20 Using Method SM 9221B Please don't hesitate to call if you have any questions and thank you very much for using our laboratory for your analtytical needs. Regards, Antony Basil Reviewed and Approved 2020 Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) crglabs@sbcglobal.net

122 CRG s QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM SUMMARY BATCH: CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document defines a batch as a group of 20 or fewer samples of similar matrix, processed together under the same conditions and with the same reagents. Quality control samples are associated with each batch and are used to assess the validity of the sample analyses. CRG typically uses batch sizes of samples. PROCEDURAL BLANKS: Laboratory contamination was controlled through the analysis of procedural blanks on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that all procedural blanks be below 10 times the MDL and all detectable constituents in the blanks be flagged in the sample results. The Procedural Blanks are presented in the Procedural Blank section of this report. ACCURACY: Accuracy of the project data was indicated by analysis of matrix spikes (MS/MSD), surrogate spikes, certified reference materials, positive controls, and/or laboratory control materials on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that 95% of the target compounds greater than 10 times the MDL be within the specified acceptance limits. The Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Accuracy Data section of this report. PRECISION: Precision of the project data was determined by analysis of duplicate matrix spikes, blank spikes, and/or duplicate test sample analysis on a minimum frequency of 1 per batch. CRG s Quality Assurance Program Document requires that for 95% of the compounds >10 times the MDL, the % Relative Percent Difference (%RPD) should be within the specified acceptance range. The %RPD for the duplicate test sample analysis can be significantly affected by the homogeneity of the sample matrix within the sample container itself causing additional variability in the analytical results. In these cases, the QA/QC Acceptance Limits may be exceeded. The %RPD and Acceptance Ranges are presented in the Precision Data section of this report. TOTAL/DISSOLVED: In some instances, the results for the Dissolved fraction can be higher than the fraction for a particular parameter. This is typically caused by the analytical variation for each result and indicates that the target parameter is primarily in the dissolved phase. GLOSSARY OF TERMS Qualifier B E H J M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 ND or U NES Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Definition Analyte was detected in the associated method blank. Analyte concentration exceeds the calibration range Sample received and/or analyzed past the recommended holding time. Analyte was detected at a concentration below the reporting limit and above the laboratory method detection limit. Reported value is estimated. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to matrix interference. The MS/MSD RPD was out of control due to matrix interference. Detection of the analyte was difficult due to matrix interference. Spike or surrogate compound recovery was out of control due to matrix interference. The associated method blank spike or surrogate compound was in control and therefore the sample data was reported without further clarification. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to an unknown compound(s) in the sample that interferes with the known target compound causing an increased response. Recovery of the MS and/or MSD compound was out of control due to unknown heavy hydrocarbons detected in the sample which elevates the baseline. Parameter not detected at the indicated reporting limit. Not enough sample. Spike recovery and RPD control limits do not apply resulting from the parameter concentration in the sample exceeding the spike concentration. The sample RPD was out of control. Sample is heterogeneous and sample homogeneity could not be readily achieved using routine laboratory practices. RPD values are not accurate and not applicable because the results for R1 and/or R2 are lower than 10 times the MDL. Due to the sample rate of the instrument, the peak area was underestimated because the apex of the peak was missed. This random error has caused this compound to fail for the spike and/or precision. This failure does not indicate any significant problems with the analysis of this sample and the data passes CRG s QAPP requirements.

123 Project Sample List Geosyntec Consultants CRG Project ID: GEO Project Officer: Brandon Steets Project Description: Montage Surfzone Monitoring CRG Sample ID# Client Sample ID Sample Description Date Sampled Matrix North 18-Feb-09 Seawater Middle 18-Feb-09 Seawater South 18-Feb-09 Seawater FDS 18-Feb-09 Seawater

124 DATA REPORT

125 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: North Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 18-Feb Feb-09 GEO :05 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B < 20 MPN/100mL 20 15:30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

126 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: Middle Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 18-Feb Feb-09 GEO :25 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B 20 MPN/100mL 20 15:30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

127 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: South Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 18-Feb Feb-09 GEO :25 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B 40 MPN/100mL 20 15:30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

128 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: R1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: FDS Montage Surfzone Monitoring Seawater CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: 18-Feb Feb-09 GEO :10 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B 20 MPN/100mL 20 15:30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # R1

129 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT

130 REAGENT BLANK RESULTS

131 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: B1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: QAQC Montage Surfzone Monitoring Reagent Reagent Blank CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: GEO008-0 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert < 10 MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E < 20 MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B < 20 MPN/100mL 20 15:30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # B1

132 ACCURACY DATA

133 Client: CRG Marine Laboratories, Inc Del Amo Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA (310) FAX (310) Microbiology Geosyntec Consultants CRG ID#: Sample Replicate #: PC1 Description: DILUTION FACTOR: Matrix: QAQC Montage Surfzone Monitoring Culture Positive Control CRG Project ID: Date Sampled: Date Received: GEO008-0 CONSTITUENT METHOD RESULT UNITS MDL TIME ANALYZED DATE ANALYZED BATCH ID Enterococci / Enterolert Enterolert PASS MPN/100mL 10 Fecal Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221E PASS MPN/100mL 20 Coliform / MTF 20 SM 9221B PASS MPN/100mL 20 15:30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb :30 18-Feb MDL= Method Detection Limit (CFR 40 Part 136); RL= Reporting Limit; J= Estimated Value below the RL and above the MDL; ND= Not Detected; NA= Not Applicable; MI = Matrix Interferance California ELAP Certificate # PC1

134 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY

135

136 APPENDIX C Field Sampling Notes October 23, 2008 Dry Weather Event December 17, 2008 and February 18, 2009 Wet Weather Events Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc May, 2009

137

138

139

140 APPENDIX D Audit Field Sheets Montage Final WQMR-21May09.doc May, 2009

141 MONTAGE LAGUNA BEACH STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST Site: Montage Laguna Beach Site Address: South Coast Highway, Laguna Beach, CA Site Representative: Shahram Sharafkhanian Contact Phone Number: (949) Inspection Date: 12/4/2008 Time: 8:00 am INSPECTION TYPE: PRIMARY X FOLLOW-UP WEATHER CONDITIONS: Sunny, dry last rain 11/25/08 GENERAL Y N N/A COMMENTS Storm drain inlets are labeled X WILL LABEL Area free of visible discharges to the storm drain X Stormwater pollution mitigation systems in place (catch basin inserts, CDS units, etc.) X Dry weather diversions functioning as intended X Regular Catch Basin Insert (CBI) maintenance implemented X Regular Continuous Deflective Separation (CDS) maintenance implemented X No dry weather discharges to ocean observed downstream of diversion/cds units X STEAM PIPE DRIPPING INTO DRIVEWAY TRASH MANAGEMENT Y N N/A COMMENTS Dumpster area is free of trash (ground, walls, etc.) X VERY CLEAN - NO LITTER OBSERVED Garbage container / dumpster lids are closed X SOME TRASH CANS W/O LIDS, WILL COVER LIQUID OBSERVED IN DUMPSTER AREA, LIKELY WASH WATER Garbage container / dumpster is free of any liquid waste or leakage X Outside area is free of trash (parking lots, sidewalks, lawns, etc.) X VERY CLEAN - NO LITTER OBSERVED EQUIPMENT AND OUTDOOR CLEANING Y N N/A COMMENTS Areas around property are dry swept rather than being hosed down (parking lots, sidewalks, outdoor dining, pool/spa deck areas, etc.) X No evidence of hotel restaurant floor mats being washed outside X Loading/unloading areas are free of leftover trash, food waste, debris, etc. X AREA ARE HOSED BUT WET/DRY VACUUM COLLECTS LIQUID MINIMAL FOOD WASTE OBSERVED IN LOADING AREA NEAR DRAIN Liquid waste from equipment cleaning is drained into an approved sewage system X TO ENFORCE Outdoor drains have no evidence of stains or non-storm water inflows X STEAM PIPE DRIPPING INTO DRIVEWAY All exterior drain lines are adequately capped/plugged X LANDSCAPING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE Y N N/A COMMENTS Fertilizer management implemented X Pesticide management implemented X No evidence of accumulated debris (tree clippings, dead leaves, etc.) X No signs of excess irrigation as runoff to storm drains X ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT Y N N/A COMMENTS Signage instructing proper pet waste cleanup X ADD STATION BY BUS STOP (SOUTH) Pet waste bag stations and disposal facilities are conveniently located X No evidence of waterfowl or other wildlife excrement X CLEANING PROGRAM IN PLACE EDUCATION AND TRAINING Y N N/A COMMENTS There is information posted for employees informing them about the following areas: * Spill prevention and control X * Prohibiting discharge of wastewater outside X DESIGNATED MOP STATION IN PLACE * Keeping dumpster areas clean X WILL ADD SIGNAGE Educational materials posted in a visible area on-site for employees to read X SIGNAGE LOCATED NEAR GREASE TRAP Employees are trained in fertilizer/pesticide management X Employees are trained in irrigation optimization X Hotel owner/manager/representative conducts regular training of employees regarding above criteria (i.e. BMPs) X IRRIGATION MANAGED VIA AUTOMATED WEATHER STATION OTHER SITE-SPECIFIC AREAS Y N N/A COMMENTS 12/4/2008 Shahram Sharafkhanian Site Representative Signature [above] Date Site Representative [print name above] 12/4/2008 Megan Patterson Inspector Signature [above] Date Inspector [print name above] Correction required Y / N Date for follow up inspection (if applicable):

142