Precipitator Dust Purification (PDP) Chloride and Potassium Removal System

Transcription

1 Precipitator Dust Purification (PDP) Chloride and Potassium Removal System NORAM Engineering and Contractors, Ltd.

2 Background Chloride and Potassium Sources Chloride Wood Furnish Example: ppm = 0.4 t/d Cl Chemical make-up (NaOH, NaSH, sesqui, salt cake, etc.) Example: 40 t/d Na 2 SO 0.5% = 0.2 t/d Cl Mill water Example: 500 gpm at 100 ppm = 0.3 t/d Cl Potassium Wood Furnish Example: ppm = 1.4 t/d K

3 Precipitator Dust Purification (PDP) Chloride and Potassium Removal High chloride and potassium concentrations in the recovery boiler cycle can cause plugging and corrosion If ESP catch purged to remove chloride and potassium costly makeup of sodium and sulfate needed Use ion exchange beds to remove chloride and potassium without losing sulfate and carbonate Best value (lowest chemical losses) of chloride and potassium removal systems

4 Temperature ( C) Sticky Temperature Effect of Chloride and Potassium Typical Mill Target with Chloride Control Typical Mill No Chloride Control K/(Na+K) mole% Cl/(Na+K) mole%

5 First Melting Temperature (FMT) Effect of Potassium and Carbonate High pressure boilers typically target K levels of <4 wt% in ash to minimize superheater corrosion

6 Precipitator Catch Treatment Chemical Recovery Opportunity Chloride and potassium are enriched in ash Selective removal of chloride and potassium can be achieved by ion exchange Chloride removal alone may be sufficient or both chloride and potassium removal beds can be installed Recovery of sodium sulfate and sodium carbonate Can also be used to treat leach and crystallizer effluent to recover sulfate and carbonate while rejecting chloride and potassium

7 Short Column IX Resin Beds Recoflo Separation Unit Reciprocating flow Short column Fine-size resin beads Efficient separation Low/no dilution 100s of installations in a wide variety of industries

8 Short Column IX Resin Beds Chloride Removal Na 2 SO 4 + Na 2 CO 3 H 2 O SSU SSU Na 2 SO 4 + Na 2 CO 3 +NaCl Sorption NaCl Desorption

9 Short Column IX Resin Beds Potassium Removal Na 2 SO 4 H 2 O + NaOH K-Removal K-Removal Na 2 SO 4 + K 2 SO 4 Sorption NaOH / KOH Desorption

10 PDP System Efficiency High Chloride Removal and Chemical Recovery Chloride Removal 80-97% Potassium Removal 4-80%* Carbonate Recovery 90-96% Sulfate Recovery 90-96% Pulping Sodium Recovery 90-96% These performances can be tuned to maximize recovery some degree Recent start-ups have achieved >95% Cl removal with >95% chemical recovery * If potassium removal ion exchange bed is part of installation removal efficiency depends on available caustic for regeneration

11 PDP System Efficiency Technology Comparison

12 Effect of Carbonate Reduced Effectiveness in Competitor Systems 1.2% CO 3 Competing chloride removal systems based on crystallization or leaching have poor performance 0.3% CO 3 on ESP dust with > 5% CO 3 At <5% CO 3 all carbonate 12.4% CO 3 is typically lost in effluent and (Poor settling) must be made up with NaOH 2.7% CO 3 PDP handles any CO 3 content with the same recovery as SO 4 0.1% CO 3 6.4% CO 3 (Poor settling)

13 Process Schematic PDP - Precipitator Dust Purification System Chloride Removal Only Water Water Pulse Filter SSU to black liquor evaporators ESP Dust NaCl Waste NPE Sludge Guard Filter Ash Mix Tank Feed Tank

14 Process Schematic Optional Potassium Removal Optional K Removal Na 2 SO 4 / Na 2 CO 3 to evaporators Water Pulse Filter Water Cl-Rem NaOH K-Rem ESP Dust NaCl Waste NaOH/KOH to bleaching NPE Sludge Guard Filter Ash Mix Tank Feed Tank Feed Tank

15 PDP Installation Arauco 30 TPD System (Pulse Filter and Break Tank)

16 OctoPlus TM Filter Socks High Surface Area Filter Elements Replaces sock over core-tube design Easy replacement More area/unit filter Smaller Pulse Filter Break Tank minimizes vacuum pressure

17 PDP Installation PDP Installation Arauco 30 TPD System (SSU Resin Bed and Feed Tanks)

18 Resin Beads Ion Exchange Bed and Feed Tanks for Cl/K Removal

19 PDP Installation WestRock 75 TPD System (Alabama, USA)

20 PDP Reference List Eight Installations Company Location Start-up Date Size Mill A Southeast USA t/d WestRock Alabama, USA t/d Mill B Southeast USA t/d Mill C Brazil t/d Mill D Brazil t/d Arauco Chile t/d Mill E Southeast USA t/d Mill F Northwest USA t/d 20

21 PDP Advantages Construction Small footprint, Flexible layout No new building required Low Installation cost Simple small piping connections to process No large vapor ducts or solids conveyors Pre-piped & instrumented modular units

22 PDP Advantages In Operation Highest chloride removal Optional potassium removal Lowest chemical losses (<10% SO 4 and CO 3 ) Lowest make-up chemical cost Less chloride input in make-up chemicals Less sulfate to sewer (CaSO4 dredging) Simple automated operation Little operator attention Operates independently of all other equipment But! Requires attention to filter maintenance

23 PDP Advantages Maintenance Equipment proven in diverse installations Low maintenance requirement Easily stopped and isolated Maintenance can be performed outside of annual mill shut-down

24 PDP System Requirements For a 75 TPD System (Typical) With Chloride Removal Only Soft Water (Dissolving Ash and Regenerating Resin) Additional Evaporator Steam Power Consumption 65 gpm 40 TPD 50 kw With Chloride and Potassium Removal Soft Water (Dissolving Ash and Regenerating Resin) Additional Evaporator Steam Power Consumption 95 gpm 45 TPD 85 kw

25 PDP System Footprint Small and Flexible Layout 75 TPD Dimensions Length Width Height Pulse Filter 20 ft 20 ft 30 ft Ion Exchange (Cl or K removal) 20 ft 15 ft 10 ft Pulse Filter Ion Exchange System

26 Thank You Questions?