Thermal Distortion Testing
|
|
- Branden Carroll
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Thermal Distortion Testing Sam Ramrattan Department of Engineering Design, Manufacturing and Management Systems Western Michigan University
2 Thermal Distortion Testing (TDT) The expansion, contraction, and degradation experienced by a mold/core under extreme heat and liquid pressure of the molten metal Effects: Expansion oversized castings Distortion penetration, veins / rat tails
3 Consequence of Problems Rat Tail Penetration
4 TDT - Stresses on Specimen
5 TDT Measurements
6 TDT
7 Effect of Compression and Tension Forces on a Sand Disc Specimen Before TDT After TDT (White unbounded sand) After TDT (Tensile crack present after 10psi blow) After TDT (Back Side) Hairline Crack
8 Samples Before Elevated to Temperature After TDT (Blown with 10psi) As-Cast Compression Surface As-Cast Tension Surface SHL Vein PUCB Penetration FUR AIO
9 TDT Curves Reminder: Percent binder and sand type held constant
10 Old Disc Concerns Density histogram and XRCT image Non-uniform specimen density
11 Old Disc Specimens Uncoated Disc Disc refractory coated at 34% solids Raised Parting Line
12 Old Disc Tooling Three-cavity core box Vertically parted Two vents per cavity
13 New Disc Tooling Three piece tool to avoid raised parting line on test surfaces - Inserts can be of different thicknesses Distributed venting to reduce density variation Layout with radial symmetry to reduce cavity to cavity specimen variation Simple shape allows for easier addition to tooling
14 New Disc Tooling Three-piece tooling for new disc specimens
15 New Disc Tooling - Insert Radial symmetry Flat faces on testing features Parting line venting applied to disc perimeter
16 New Disc Tooling Specimens Tree of disc specimens produced in new tool
17 Simulation Core Blowing Volume Fraction
18 Simulation Predicted Specimen Density
19 Simulation Core Blowing Air Velocity Vectors
20 Simulation Core Curing Curing Front Progression
21 Testing parameters: Old vs New tooling specimens Same test conditions Control of specimen recipe - Same sand - WI, 65 AFS/gfn, Round Same binder system Same binder level - 0.9%
22 Results
23 Results
24 Results
25 Results
26 Results
27 Displacement Identifying time till crack occurrence 0.14 Raidial movement Time
28 Map & Measure the HAZ
29 Image Analysis Sample - Before Test Sample - After Elevated Temperature Exposure Displacement Composite Overlay
30 Measurement of As-Cast Defects SHL Vein: Max Height 0.02in PUCB Penetration: Max Height 0.061in Note: Neutral Surface Determined from Pretested Specimen Surface
31
32 Coating Properties Measurement Coating % Solids Surface Tension [7.5 sec to equilibration] (Dyne/cm) Ct1 (0.35% Surfactant) Ct3 (0.15% Surfactant) 38% ±0.01 ± % ±0.01 ± 0.77 CastExpo 10 March 20-23, 2010 Orlando, FL USA
33 Differences in Sand Distribution
34 before TDT Results after TDT (0.14MPa) (coated side) after After TDT (0.07MPa) (back side)
35 Longitudinal Distortion / mm plastic deformation expansion 0.1 uncoated disc 42% sol. 38% sol. 34% sol. 0 Time / sec
36 What is the effects of blends and additives?
37 Green Sand TDT Specimen
38 Casting Trial Stress on Specimen
39 Casting Trial: Compression/Tension Model
40 Casting Trial: Distortion Measurement Model Designed to mimic parameters of TDT:
41 Thank You For Your Attention
42 For additional information, please contact: Name: Sam Ramrattan Address: WMU CEAS, Kalamazoo, MI Phone: Fax: Web Site Address: wmich.edu/edmms/